Clinical implication of plasma level of soluble fibrin monomer-fibrinogen complex in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE: We prospectively studied the clinical implication of plasma level of soluble fibrin monomer (FM)-fibrinogen complex, a recently established molecular marker reflecting thrombin activity, in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) undergoing elective aortic repair. METHODS: The study included 49 patients who underwent elective aneurysm repair using a gelatin-sealed or nonimpregnated Dacron prosthesis. Plasma level of soluble FM-fibrinogen complex was measured before surgery and on days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 10 postoperatively by latex agglutination assay utilizing monoclonal antibody IF-43. Plasma levels of thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), D-dimer, alpha2-plasmin inhibitor-plasmin complex (PIC), and fibrinogen were also evaluated. RESULTS: The preoperative level of soluble FM-fibrinogen complex showed variation in the degree of hemostatic activation, with fair correlations with TAT (r = 0.509, P < .001), D-dimer (r = 0.521, P < .001), and PIC (r = 0.579, P < .001). The patients with greater intraoperative blood loss (> or = 800 mL) showed a significantly elevated plasma level of soluble FM-fibrinogen complex preoperatively compared with those with less intraoperative blood loss (P = .009). Its postoperative fluctuation showed a similar pattern to that of TAT, reflecting the time course of coagulation activity. Gelatin impregnation of the Dacron vascular graft did not seem to influence the postoperative systemic coagulation mechanism. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that soluble FM-fibrinogen complex appears to be a useful diagnostic molecular marker to assess the activity of the coagulation system, and that its preoperative level may serve as a potential risk factor for intraoperative hemorrhagic diathesis in patients undergoing elective AAA repair.     

Hormonal stress response and hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing endovascular vs. conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To investigate the effect of two different surgical techniques with different anesthetic modes on intraoperative and postoperative hormonal stress response, hemodynamic stability, fluid loading and renal function in patients scheduled for elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty consecutive patients scheduled for elective infrarenal AAA repair were allocated without randomizing into two groups: an endovascular (EVAR, n = 20) and a conventional (CAR, n = 20) aneurysm repair group according to aneurysm morphology as determined by preoperative computed tomography and angiography. The EVAR group were operated under spinal anesthesia and the CAR group using general anesthesia with epidural blockade. RESULTS: Patients undergoing CAR showed lower intraoperative mean arterial pressure and significantly higher plasma norepinephrine before aortic cross-clamping and significantly higher lactate after aortic declamping and postoperatively than patients in the EVAR group. Postoperatively, vasopressin and serum cortisol were also significantly higher in the CAR group. Fluid loading and estimated blood loss were more excessive in the CAR group. CONCLUSIONS: Stress response was lower and hemodynamic stability and lower body perfusion superior and renal function also better maintained in patients undergoing EVAR under spinal anesthesia as compared to those undergoing CAR using general anesthesia with epidural blockade.     

Blood loss and transfusion in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative blood loss and transfusion are known determinants of mortality and morbidity of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The present study analysed the pattern of blood loss and transfusion and evaluated the risk factors of blood loss during open repair of infrarenal AAA. METHODS: Blood loss, transfusion and fluid replacement during elective open repair operation for patients with infrarenal AAA were correlated to demographic data, operative findings and procedural information. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients with a mean age of 71 years was analysed. The mean blood loss was 1000 +/- 887 mL (200-6000 mL). Blood transfusion, with a mean transfusion volume of 400 +/- 591 mL (0-3000 mL), was required in 46% of patients. Univariate analysis showed that bodyweight, renal impairment, low haemoglobin and platelet counts, iliac artery involvement, large aneurysm, bifurcated graft, large graft diameter, prolonged aortic clamp time and long operation time were associated with a higher blood loss. A haemoglobin level of <10.5 g/dL (relative risk (RR): 4.6), platelet count <130 x 10(9)/L (RR: 3.9), aortic clamp time >50 min (RR: 15), total operation time >200 min (RR: 11) and type of graft (RR: 3.5) were identified as independent determinants of blood loss on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative blood loss in elective infrarenal aneurysm surgery is influenced by patients' haematological parameters, distal involvement of aneurysm and degree of difficulty of operation.     

Preoperative cardiac assessment for patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: a survey of current practice by vascular surgeons in New South Wales and Australian Capital Territory

Background: The reported mortality rate following open elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) varies between 0 and 12%. Much of the mortality and major morbidity is caused by cardiac events. The evidence regarding best practice for cardiac assessment and optimization of this patient group is unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate current practice of cardiac risk factor assessment by vas­cular surgeons in New South Wales (NSW) and Australian Capital Territory (ACT) for patients undergoing open elective repair of infrarenal AAA. Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to 46 surgeons in NSW and ACT identified as expressing a principal or major interest in vascular surgery. If no response was received within 3 weeks, a second questionnaire was sent and if no response was received after the second mailing, a telephone survey of non‐responders was conducted. Data were collated regarding the importance of risk factors elicited by clinical history, preoperative investigation, referral for cardiological opinion, use of perioperative beta‐blockade and the timing of aortic surgery in relation to coronary artery revascularization and acute myocardial infarction. Results: The overall response rate was 87% (40/46) and the median (range) response time was 14 (4?109) days. Only 22 of 40 and 23 of 40 surgeons consider diabetes mellitus or renal impairment, respectively, to be important when assessing cardiac risk and 34 of 40 surgeons do not employ a validated risk index in preoperative assessment. Sixteen of 40 surgeons refer all patients needing AAA repair to a cardiologist, while 24 of 40 would initiate cardiac investigations themselves (either stress electrocardiography, scintigraphy or echocardiography). Seventeen surgeons always or usually commenced perioperative beta‐blockade with wide variations in the commencement (1 to > 28 days preoperatively) and duration (< 1 week to > 28 days postoperatively) of treatment. The timing of AAA repair following coronary revascularization ranged from < 1 week to 6 months and delay in surgical repair of AAA following myocardial infarction ranged from < 1 week to > 6 months. Conclusion: Preoperative assessment of cardiac risk in patients for repair of AAA lacks consensus among vascular surgeons in NSW and ACT. The diversity of clinical practice may rest with the paucity of prospective trials published in the medical literature or the influence of local institutional facilities.     

Peroperative factors influencing the outcome of elective abdominal aorta aneurysm repair.

PURPOSE: To identify perioperative variables which may influence mortality of elective abdominal aneurysm repair (AAA). METHOD: prospective study of patients undergoing elective AAA repair between 1986 and 1997. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy patients (438 men, 32 females) with a mean age of 69.4+/-13 years and aneurysms with a diameter of 60+/-3 mm were operated on with a 1-month mortality rate of 5.3%. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors for mortality: age >70 (p<0.0001), a past history of myocardial infarction (p<0.0001), preoperative renal insufficiency (p<0.0001), reoperation (p<0.0001), colonic necrosis (p<0.0001), and severe postoperative medical complications (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: Intra- and postoperative events affect the outcome of AAA repair, independently of preoperative factors, and should be described when presenting the results of AAA repair.     

The effect of acute normovolaemic haemodilution on blood transfusion requirements in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the impact of acute normovolaemic haemodilution (ANH) on the blood transfusion requirements in elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in a single vascular unit. METHODS: thirty-two patients underwent ANH during elective AAA repair between 1992 and 1997. The operation was performed by the same surgeon/anaesthetist team in 75% of cases. Their demographic details, type of aneurysm (infra-renal or supra-renal), preoperative blood cross match, use of intra-operative red cell salvage, blood loss, peri-operative bank blood requirements, pre-op and on-discharge haemoglobin levels and post-operative outcome were recorded. The results were compared to a group of 40 randomly selected patients (to represent the unit average) who underwent elective AAA repair by variable surgeon/anaesthetist teams without ANH in the same time period. RESULTS: there were more supra-renal AAA repairs in the ANH group (8/32) than in the non-ANH group (0/40, p<0.01). ANH patients required significantly less blood transfusion peri-operatively (median 2 units) than the non-ANH patients (median 3 units, p=0.02). There were no other significant differences between the variables measured. CONCLUSION: these results suggest that a dedicated team can achieve significant reductions in the use of heterologous blood transfusion compared to the vascular unit average experience by the effective use of ANH.     

Juxtarenal aneurysm. Comparative study with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm and proposition of a new classification.

OBJECTIVE: to propose an anatomical classification of juxtarenal aortic aneurysm (JRA) that relates to their epidemiology and the result of surgical repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: retrospective study of 53 JRA and 376 infrarenal aortic aneurysm (AAA) operated between January 1989 and August 1999. RESULTS: perioperative mortality after JRA repair was 19% for type A (interrenal), 13% for type B (aneurysm of one or two renal origins) and 4% for type C (no infrarenal neck). These differences were not significant. The overall perioperative mortality after JRA repair (11%) was significantly higher than mortality of AAA (3%p<0.01). Postoperative morbidity after JRA repair was 62% for type A, 75% for type B and 33% for type C. Postoperative morbidity after type B repair was significantly more frequent than after type C (p<0.001). The overall postoperative morbidity (51%) was significantly more frequent than after AAA repair (26%p<0.01). Preoperative ischaemic heart disease, aortic clamping above the coeliac axis and aortic proximal clamping longer than 30 min were significant risk factors for death after JRA repair. Survival by life-table analysis at five years after JRA repair and AAA repair were respectively 73%+/-7% and 76%+/-3%. CONCLUSION: there is a less favourable outcome after JRA repair as compared to AAA repair. The complexity of the surgical procedure requires accurate preoperative morphological assessment. The proposed classification of juxtarenal aneurysms may be helpful in guiding surgical access.     

Operative mortality rate for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is not increased by the presence of a previous or concurrent thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic dissection

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the likelihood of mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in patients with thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic dissection. METHODS: Fourteen patients (11 men, three women) with known thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic dissections underwent elective AAA repair from 1986 to 2001, including three patients with acute dissections (less than 14 days) and 11 patients with chronic dissections (14 days or longer). All 14 patients had type III aortic dissections. Stent graft exclusion of the aortic dissection was performed in one patient before AAA repair. Preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative events, perioperative complications, and 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were assessed. RESULTS: Elective AAA repair in the setting of thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic dissection in this series was associated with no 30-day mortality and a 1-year mortality rate of 7.1%. Furthermore, preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative events, and perioperative complications did not appear to be associated with late, 1-year, mortality. CONCLUSION: Elective AAA repair in the setting of acute or chronic aortic dissection is associated with mortality rates similar to those generally attributed to elective AAA repair without accompanying aortic dissection. Nevertheless, the conduct of the operation is usually complex, especially in the setting of an acute aortic dissection.     

Indications for the surgical treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND: On the basis of a literature review and of personal experience, the authors analyze the main indications and the best strategy for elective surgical repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). METHODS: Personal experience concerning elective surgical treatment of 110 patients with infrarenal AAA, is presented. RESULTS: No operative deaths have been observed and the postoperative recovery was regular in 108 patients. Two early complications (colon ischemia) and ten late postoperative complications (5 pseudoaneurysms, 5 sexual dysfunctions) occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The main therapeutic guidelines concerning the management of AAA should follow specific indications (aneurysm dimensions and growth rates). Indications for operative repair of aneurysms obviously should be judged in relation to the presence or absence of associated risk factors or concomitant medical conditions. In most cases, aneurysm repair can be performed safely, despite associated medical risks, by careful preoperative evaluation and preparation.     

Positive fluid balance is associated with complications after elective open infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: Open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is associated with cardiac and respiratory complications and an overall mortality rate of 2 to 8%. We hypothesised that excessive fluid administration during the perioperative period contributes to complications and poor outcome after AAA repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Medical records were analysed for fluid balance and complications in 100 consecutive patients treated by open AAA repair at a single centre between 2002-2005. Mortality and all major adverse events (MAE) such as myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac arrhythmia (Arr), pulmonary oedema (PO), pulmonary infection (PI), and acute renal failure (ARF) were included in the analysis. Level of care and hospital stay, were also recorded. RESULTS: There were no in-hospital deaths. MAE occurred in 40/100 (40%): MI (6%); Arr (14%); PO (14%); PI (25%); ARF (8%). Complications were not predicted by preoperative cardiovascular risk factors, operative and clamp time, or blood loss. Patients with complications had significantly greater cumulative positive fluid balance on postoperative day 0 (p<0.01), day 1 (p<0.05), day 2 (p<0.03) and day 3 (p<0.04). This relationship also existed for individual complications such as MI, and pulmonary oedema. These patients had significantly longer ICU/HDU (p<0.002) and hospital stay (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Serious complications are common after elective open AAA repair, and we have shown that positive fluid balance is predictive of major adverse events increased HDU/ICU and overall hospital stay.     

The influence of aneurysm size on perioperative cardiac outcome in elective open infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair

BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) size and growth has been found to be associated with local generation of inflammation markers such as interleukin-6. Inflammation also seems to be important in perioperative adverse cardiac events. We hypothesized that patients with a large AAA are at increased risk for cardiac events. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent a computed tomography angiography scan before open elective infrarenal AAA repair between March 2000 and December 2005 at three hospitals were analyzed. All patients were screened for the clinical risk factors of age, gender, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, heart failure, diabetes, stroke, renal failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as well as for cardioprotective medication. Postoperative data on troponin release, creatine kinase/creatine kinase isoenzyme MB, and electrocardiogram were routinely collected on days 1, 3, 7, and 30. The main outcome measure was the combined end point of 30-day cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of AAA size on postoperative cardiac outcome. RESULTS: The study included 500 patients. Their mean age was 69.8 +/- 9.5 years, and 431 (86%) were men. Thirty-one patients (6.2%) had perioperative cardiovascular complications, consisting of 15 (3.0%) cardiovascular deaths and 16 (3.2%) nonfatal myocardial infarctions. After correction for other risk factors, including age, Revised Cardiac Risk Index, medication use, duration of surgery, and intraoperative blood loss, AAA size was independently associated with perioperative nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiovascular death (3.2% increase in risk for each millimeter added, 95% confidence interval 1.1% to 6.2%, P = .007). CONCLUSION: A larger AAA size is independently associated with an increased incidence of perioperative cardiovascular complications after elective infrarenal AAA repair.     

A review of 103 cases with elective repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: an analysis of the risk factors based on postoperative complications and long-term follow-up

From 1982 through 1992, 103 patients (mean age: 69 years) underwent an elective repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) at our institution. One or more postoperative complications occurred in 30 patients (29%), with a mortality rate of 1.9%. Factors which were found to be significantly associated with postoperative complications based on an univariate analysis included male sex (P = 0.0082), operation time (P = 0.0006), the size of the aneurysm (P = 0.0045), the amount of blood loss during operation (P = 0.0037), poor lung function (P = 0.0155), and the platelet count (P = 0.0468),. A simple linear regression analysis showed that there were significant correlations among the AAA size, the duration of operation and the amount of blood loss. The age at operation, however, did not influence morbidity or mortality. Complete survival information was obtained in 96 (95%) patients, while the influence of preoperative risk factors on late survival was also examined by the Kaplan-Meier method. The factors influencing long-term survival were determined to be renal dysfunction and age at the time of operation.     

Endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm--a challenge to open repair? Results of a single centre experience in 20 patients.

INTRODUCTION: The mortality from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) remains in the region of 50% despite advances in critical care. Endovascular repair of AAA has been shown to be associated with reduced physiological stress in the elective setting. It is hypothesised that the reduced physiological stress associated with EVAR may improve the outcome in patients with ruptured AAA. METHODS: A feasibility study of endovascular repair of ruptured AAA was undertaken at the University Hospital, Nottingham, U.K. between 1994 and 2000. Patients admitted with ruptured AAA were assessed by a team familiar with endovascular techniques for elective repair of AAA. After giving informed consent patients underwent spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) in the majority of cases. Patients were then transferred to the operating theatre for EVAR. RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent repair of ruptured AAA. Of these 20 patients, seven were referred from another hospital. Eight patients were considered unfit for open repair. The median duration of procedure was 180 min (range 120-480) and median blood loss was 1200 ml (range 750-2000 ml). The overall peri-operative mortality was 45%. A number of intra-operative and peri-operative procedures (both open and endovascular) were required to ensure aneurysm exclusion and to deal with the complications of endovascular surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Ruptured AAA remains a particularly hazardous condition to treat. There are a number of advantages of EVAR in this condition. A number of the problems early in the experience of EVAR have been addressed, but further experience is required to demonstrate its efficacy when compared with open repair.     

The incidence, natural history, and outcome of secondary intervention for persistent collateral flow in the excluded abdominal aortic aneurysm

OBJECTIVE: The goal of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair is the prevention of rupture. Exclusion of the infrarenal AAA by means of operation or endovascular graft placement is an alternative therapy to achieve this goal. However, thrombosis of the excluded aneurysm sac does not always occur and further intervention may be needed. This study examines the efficacy of available screening methods to detect the persistence of aneurysm sac flow and the outcome of secondary procedures to treat this problem. METHODS: During the past 14 years, 1218 patients have undergone operative retroperitoneal exclusion of AAA. To date, 48 patients have been found to have persistent flow in the excluded AAA sac with duplex scanning. Twenty-seven patients underwent surgical intervention, and seven of these procedures were performed for rupture. Six patients have undergone treatment with interventional techniques (four successfully). The patients were evaluated for preoperative angiographic, anatomic, and comorbid factors that may have predisposed them to failed exclusion. Also, perioperative morbidity and mortality, estimated blood loss, and survival were assessed in the patients who required surgical treatment. RESULTS: There were no perioperative parameters that correlated with postoperative persistent flow in the excluded AAA sac. The mean time to secondary intervention was 51 months (range, 2 to 113 months). Two patients had false-negative computed tomographic angiogram results, eight patients had false-negative angiogram results, and six patients had duplex scan examinations that had initially negative results that were then positive for flow in sac. Reoperation had a 7.4% mortality rate (two deaths) and a median blood loss of 2600 mL, as compared with 500 mL for primary procedures. CONCLUSION: Secondary operations for patent excluded aortic aneurysm sacs have higher mortality and intraoperative blood loss rates than do primary procedures for AAA repair. The localization of branch leaks with computerized tomographic angiography, angiography, and duplex scanning were imprecise, and better methods are needed to adequately diagnose patent sacs. Expansion of AAA sac may be the only reliable factor.     

Analysis of medical risk factors and outcomes in patients undergoing open versus endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

OBJECTIVE: The emergence of endovascular repair (ER) for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) has provided surgeons with a new technique that should ideally improve patient outcomes. To more accurately characterize the advantages of ER versus traditional/open AAA repair (TOR), we compared the preoperative medical risk factors (PMRFs) and perioperative outcomes (PO) of those patients undergoing elective treatment of infrarenal AAA with ER and TOR over a recent 18-month period at our center. METHODS: Through our institutional vascular surgery patient registry, all patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair of any type between December 1999 and June 2001 were identified. Only those patients undergoing elective infrarenal AAA repair were analyzed. Hospital records were examined for all patients, and PMRF and PO were assessed via Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery reporting guidelines. Student t, chi(2), Fisher exact, or Wilcoxon rank sum tests were applied where appropriate to determine differences among PMRF and PO according to method of aneurysm repair. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period, a total of 199 aortic aneurysms were repaired at our institution. Ninety-nine elective infrarenal AAA repairs made up the study cohort (ER, n = 33; TOR, n = 66). When examined by method of aneurysm repair, no differences existed in demographics or AAA size. Patients undergoing ER had a significantly greater degree of preoperative pulmonary comorbidity than patients undergoing TOR (P <.001). However, no differences existed in terms of American Society of Anesthesiologists classification or cardiac (P =.52), cerebrovascular (P =.44), diabetic (P =.51), hypertensive (P =.90), hyperlipidemia (P =.91) or renal (P =.23) comorbidities between the two groups. Perioperative morbidity and mortality rates were also not significantly different by method of repair. ER was associated with shorter operative time, intensive care unit stay, and overall hospital length of stay (P <.0001). However, subsequent operative procedures related to the AAA repair were performed more frequently after ER (TOR = 1.5% versus ER = 15.2%; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ER offers improvements in hospital convalescent and operating room times but no beneficial impact on overall morbidity and mortality rates when similar PMRFs exist, especially when used at medical centers where low morbidity and mortality rates are already established for TOR. Other centers performing ER should undertake such an analysis to assess its impact on their patients.     

Results of surgical therapy and classification of non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

INTRODUCTION: Surgery for symptomatic aortic abdominal aneurysms (sAAA) is associated with an increased mortality and morbidity compared to asymptomatic aortic aneurysms (aAAA). With the advent of endovascular therapy, an alternative therapeutic modality has become available. Endovascular therapy, however, depends on certain morphologic criteria, whereas open surgery can be performed on any type of AAA. The purpose of this study was to analyse our data of surgical treatment of non ruptured AAA and to identify the amount of patients in whom endovascular therapy would have been possible. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the medical data of all patients operated upon non ruptured AAA in our department by 3 responsible vascular surgeons from 1995-1999. RESULTS: 225 consecutive patients with a median age of 65 (42-95) years were included in the study. There were 184 (82%) male and 41 (18%) female patients with 143 (63.5%) aAAA and 82 (36.5%) sAAA. Patients with sAAA underwent emergency aneurysm repair and had a significantly increased aneurysm diameter compared to the aAAA, who underwent elective surgical aneurysm repair (6.9 +/- 1.6 cm vs. 6 +/- 1.2 cm; p = 0.002). A total of 11 (4.9%) patients had an inflammatory AAA. Smoking was found to be the only significant increased preoperative risk factor in the group of sAAA compared to aAAA (91 vs. 35 patients; p = 0.008). Morbidity was significantly increased in the patients with sAAA compared to the aAAA (55% vs. 31.5%; p = 0.041) The mortality however did not differ significantly in the two groups (2 vs. 3 patients; p = 0.691). Considering morphological criteria of the AAA, endovascular therapy would have been possible in 59 (26%) patients. However, in 24 (11%) of the 59 patients, endovascular therapy was not feasible because of aortic kinking, heavy calcification of the aneurysm neck, a patent inferior mesenteric artery or atherosclerotic diseased iliac arteries. Consequently, only 35 (15%) patients would have qualified for an endovascular therapy. DISCUSSION: Surgical therapy can be performed in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic AAA with an equal low mortality. This finding underlines the fact, that surgical therapy still remains the standard therapy for AAA. In addition, in our study only a relative small amount of patients would have qualified for an endovascular therapy.     

Use of the cell saver during elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery--influence on transfusion with bank blood. A retrospective survey.

One hundred and two patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and admitted to ICU at RPAH in 1989/90 were studied. In forty patients a cell saver was used during the operative procedure (Group CS) while in the remaining sixty-two patients intraoperative blood loss was drained and discarded conventionally (Group NCS). Preoperative ASA grade and postoperative APACHE score were similar in these two groups. The amount of bank blood transfused intraoperatively was less in Group CS than in Group NCS (0.6 +/- 0.2 vs 3.3 +/- 0.3 units) (mean +/- SEM) (P less than 0.0001). The total amount of bank blood transfused during hospital admission was also less in Group CS (1.5 +/- 0.4 vs 4.8 +/- 0.4 units, P less than 0.0001). Of Group CS, 22 patients (55%) received no bank blood compared to two patients (3%) in Group NCS. There was no difference between the groups with respect to postoperative haemoglobin and creatinine levels. ICU stay was similar in both groups. We conclude that use of the cell saver reduces perioperative bank blood transfusion in elective abdominal aortic surgery.     

Haemodilutional effect of standard fluid management limits the effectiveness of acute normovolaemic haemodilution in AAA surgery--results of a pilot trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of standard fluid management on the effectiveness of ANH as a blood conservation method in elective open AAA repair. DESIGN: Prospective randomised controlled study. METHODS: Thirty-four patients undergoing elective AAA repair were randomised to have ANH (16) or act as controls (18). Intra-operative cell salvage was permitted in both groups. Haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations were determined at variable intervals peri-operatively. Blood loss and the use of heterologous blood were recorded. RESULTS: The pre- and post-operative Hb concentrations, surgical blood loss and the use of cell salvage were similar in both groups. Hb concentration (median, range) decreased significantly from pre-operative to aortic clamping (with blood loss <100 ml) in ANH patients from 8.8 (7.5-10.2) to 5.7 (4.2-6.6)mmol/l following ANH but also in controls from 8.6 (7.5-9.7) to 7.0 (4.5-9.0)mmol/l due to fluid infusion (P<0.01 for every comparison). Bank blood requirements were similar: median 2 units in ANH and 2.5 units in control patients (P=0.68). CONCLUSIONS: Large volumes of fluids infused during AAA repair already conserve blood by the mechanism of hypervolaemic haemodilution. When cell salvage is used with standard fluid management during AAA repair, additional ANH is ineffective in saving blood.     

Predictors of severe morbidity and death after elective abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to identify risk factors associated with an unfavorable outcome after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: The clinical records of 158 patients who underwent elective open AAA repair with COPD determined from preadmission International Classification of Diseases-ninth revision codes during a 12-year period at the University of Michigan were reviewed. Patients with uncomplicated outcomes (group I) were compared with those with unfavorable postoperative outcomes (group II). The unfavorable outcomes were defined as myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, worsening respiratory insufficiency necessitating tracheostomy, or death within 30 days of surgery. Logistic regression analyses of variables that were identified as being statistically significant in the univariate analysis were used to develop a predictive model of these events. RESULTS: Group I included 133 patients (77 men, 56 women) with a mean age of 70.1 years, and group II included 25 patients (13 men, 12 women) with a mean age of 71.4 years. Preoperative factors statistically related (P =.002) to an unfavorable outcome in group II patients included: suboptimal COPD management (fewer prescribed inhalers), lower hematocrit, preoperative renal insufficiency, and coronary artery disease. Importantly, abnormal preoperative spirometry and arterial blood gases were not predictive of a poor outcome. Univariate analysis also revealed increased hospital (25 versus 13 days; P =.0001) and intensive care unit (14 versus 4 days; P =.001) length of stays and a greater need for prolonged ventilation (8 versus 1 day; P =.039) for group II patients compared with group I patients. The 30-day mortality rate in the entire experience was 3.2% (5/158). No specific variables associated with mortality were identified. CONCLUSION: Fewer prescribed inhalers, lower hematocrit, renal insufficiency, and coronary artery disease are preoperative factors associated with unfavorable outcomes after open elective surgical repair of AAA in patients with COPD. Intensive management of these factors may reduce the hazards of AAA operations in these patients. COPD alone should not be considered a deterrent to the surgical treatment of AAAs.     

腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术单中心治疗经验

目的 评价腔内修复术(endovascular aneurysm repair,EVAR)治疗肾下型腹主动脉瘤(abdominal aortic aneurysm,AAA)的围术期和中远期效果.方法 回顾性分析131例AAA行EVAR的临床资料,评价EVAR治疗AAA的安全性和中远期疗效.结果 手术时间(137±29) min,术中出血(142±20) ml、输血(46±26) ml、ICU恢复时间为(17±4)h.围术期主要并发症包括重度心功能不全8例、心肌梗死2例、肺部并发症5例,内漏4例等;随访中发现内漏15例,Ⅰ型8例,Ⅱ型5例,Ⅲ型和Ⅳ型各1例,死亡2例;Kaplan-Meier生存分析无并发症生存率及再次处理率提示60个月后仍有并发症发生,其中40％是需要再次处理的并发症.结论 EVAR是AAA的安全治疗方法,但需要长期严格随访并及时处理并发症.