Poor recovery sleep after sleep deprivation in delayed sleep phase syndrome

To clarify disturbances in sleep regulation in patients with delayed sleep phase syndrome (DSPS), we studied three patients with DSPS and seven healthy controls. Sleep propensity and melatonin rhythms after 24-h sleep deprivation were investigated under dim light condition by using the ultra-short sleep-wake schedule. The sleep propensity curves displayed clear differences between DSPS patients and the controls. During the subjective day when melatonin was not produced, recovery sleep after the sleep deprivation did not occur in DSPS patients, while recovery sleep occurred during the subjective day in controls. This suggests that DSPS may involve problems related to the homeostatic regulation of sleep after sleep deprivation.     

癫癎与睡眠及睡眠障碍

睡眠、睡眠障碍与癫癎之间的相互影响是复杂且多方面的。睡眠及睡眠剥夺可能活化癫癎发作或活化脑电图的癫癎样放电,某些类型的癫癎发作可能只发生或主要发生在睡眠中;而癫癎发作本身又可干扰睡眠,改变睡眠模式;睡眠中的同一种异常     

Neuroimaging of sleep and sleep disorders

Herein are presented the results of research in the area of sleep neuroimaging over the past year. Significant work has been performed to clarify the basic mechanisms of sleep in humans. New studies also extend prior observations regarding altered brain activation in response to sleep deprivation by adding information regarding vulnerability to sleep deprivation and regarding the influence of task difficulty on aberrant responses. Studies in sleep disorder medicine have yielded significant findings in insomnia, depression, and restless legs syndrome. Extensive advances have been made in the area of sleep apnea where physiologic challenges have been used to probe brain activity in the pathophysiology of sleep apnea syndrome.     

Enhanced slow sleep in extended sleep

The slow wave sleep (0.5-2.5 Hz) of 42 subjects who slept in a laboratory for more than 8 h was examined. Although the amount of slow wave sleep diminished exponentially across the first 11 h of sleep, there is evidence of an increase in amount of slow wave sleep in more extended sleep. This finding complicates the concepts of slow wave sleep as an index of sleep need due to prior wakefulness or an index of a restoration process.     

Neuroimaging of sleep and sleep disorders

Herein are presented the results of research in the area of sleep neuroimaging over the past year. Significant work has been performed to clarify the basic mechanisms of sleep in humans. New studies also extend prior observations regarding altered brain activation in response to sleep deprivation by adding information regarding vulnerability to sleep deprivation and regarding the influence of task difficulty on aberrant responses. Studies in sleep disorder medicine have yielded significant findings in insomnia, depression, and restless legs syndrome. Extensive advances have been made in the area of sleep apnea where physiologic challenges have been used to probe brain activity in the pathophysiology of sleep apnea syndrome.     

Human sleep spindle characteristics after sleep deprivation

OBJECTIVE: Sleep spindles (12-15 Hz oscillations) are one of the hallmarks of the electroencephalogram (EEG) during human non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep. The effect of a 40 h sleep deprivation (SD) on spindle characteristics along the antero-posterior axis was investigated. METHODS: EEGs during non-REM sleep in healthy young volunteers were analyzed with a new method for instantaneous spectral analysis, based on the fast time frequency transform (FTFT), which yields high-resolution spindle parameters in the combined time and frequency domain. RESULTS: FTFT revealed that after SD, mean spindle amplitude was enhanced, while spindle density was reduced. The reduction in spindle density was most prominent in the frontal derivation (Fz), while spindle amplitude was increased in all derivations except in Fz. Mean spindle frequency and its variability within a spindle were reduced after SD. When analyzed per 0.25 Hz frequency bin, amplitude was increased in the lower spindle frequency range (12-13.75 Hz), whereas density was reduced in the high spindle frequency range (13.5-14.75 Hz). CONCLUSIONS: The observed reduction in spindle density after SD confirms the inverse homeostatic relationship between sleep spindles and slow waves whereas the increase in spindle amplitude and the reduction in intra-spindle frequency variability support the hypothesis of a higher level of synchronization in thalamocortical cells when homeostatic sleep pressure is enhanced.     

Platform sleep deprivation affects deep slow wave sleep in addition to REM sleep

Rats were sleep deprived by the platform method to look for differential effects on light and deep slow wave sleep depending on platform size. Diameters of large and small platforms were 15 cm and 5.1 cm respectively. Sleep was recorded during a baseline light period (09.00-19.00 h), continuously during 48 h of sleep deprivation and during the first lights on recovery period (09.00-19.00 h). In both platform conditions REM sleep was virtually abolished during the first light period (hours 0-10 of sleep deprivation), while NREM sleep was reduced to approximately half of control values. During the second light period (hours 22-34 of sleep deprivation) REM sleep recovered somewhat in the large platform group. Light slow wave sleep (SWS-1) was comparable to baseline while deep slow wave sleep (SWS-2) was still significantly reduced. In the small platform group both SWS-2 and REM sleep was considerably reduced on day 2. Over the whole deprivation period there was an effect of platform size on SWS-1 (higher in the small platform group), and on SWS-2 and REM sleep (lower in the small platform group). During the 9 h light-time recovery sleep there was an REM sleep rebound in both groups. SWS-1 was reduced in both groups while SWS-2 was not significantly increased. The ratio SWS-2/SWS-1 was, however, significantly increased only in the small platform group recovery sleep. The results suggest that platform sleep deprivation deprives the animals of deep slow wave sleep in addition to REM sleep. This has implications for conclusions on REM sleep function based upon REM sleep deprivation.     

Cognitive consequences of sleep and sleep loss

Although we still lack any consensus function(s) for sleep, accumulating evidence suggests it plays an important role in homeostatic restoration, thermoregulation, tissue repair, immune control and memory processing. In the last decade an increasing number of reports continue to support a bidirectional and symbiotic relationship between sleep and memory. Studies using procedural and declarative learning tasks have demonstrated the need for sleep after learning in the offline consolidation of new memories. Furthermore, these consolidation benefits appear to be mediated by an overnight neural reorganization of memory that may result in a more efficient storage of information, affording improved next-day recall. Sleep before learning also appears to be critical for brain functioning. Specifically, one night of sleep deprivation markedly impairs hippocampal function, imposing a deficit in the ability to commit new experiences to memory. Taken together, these observations are of particular ecologic importance from a professional and education perspective when considering that sleep time continues to decrease across all age ranges throughout industrialized nations.     

Metabolic consequences of sleep and sleep loss

Reduced sleep duration and quality appear to be endemic in modern society. Curtailment of the bedtime period to minimum tolerability is thought to be efficient and harmless by many. It has been known for several decades that sleep is a major modulator of hormonal release, glucose regulation and cardiovascular function. In particular, slow wave sleep (SWS), thought to be the most restorative sleep stage, is associated with decreased heart rate, blood pressure, sympathetic nervous activity and cerebral glucose utilization, compared with wakefulness. During SWS, the anabolic growth hormone is released while the stress hormone cortisol is inhibited. In recent years, laboratory and epidemiologic evidence have converged to indicate that sleep loss may be a novel risk factor for obesity and type 2 diabetes. The increased risk of obesity is possibly linked to the effect of sleep loss on hormones that play a major role in the central control of appetite and energy expenditure, such as leptin and ghrelin. Reduced leptin and increased ghrelin levels correlate with increases in subjective hunger when individuals are sleep restricted rather than well rested. Given the evidence, sleep curtailment appears to be an important, yet modifiable, risk factor for the metabolic syndrome, diabetes and obesity. The marked decrease in average sleep duration in the last 50 years coinciding with the increased prevalence of obesity, together with the observed adverse effects of recurrent partial sleep deprivation on metabolism and hormonal processes, may have important implications for public health.     

Neuroimmunologic aspects of sleep and sleep loss

The complex and intimate interactions between the sleep and immune systems have been the focus of study for several years. Immune factors, particularly the interleukins, regulate sleep and in turn are altered by sleep and sleep deprivation. The sleep-wake cycle likewise regulates normal functioning of the immune system. Although a large number of studies have focused on the relationship between the immune system and sleep, relatively few studies have examined the effects of sleep deprivation on immune parameters. Studies of sleep deprivation's effects are important for several reasons. First, in the 21st century, various societal pressures require humans to work longer and sleep less. Sleep deprivation is becoming an occupational hazard in many industries. Second, to garner a greater understanding of the regulatory effects of sleep on the immune system, one must understand the consequences of sleep deprivation on the immune system. Significant detrimental effects on immune functioning can be seen after a few days of total sleep deprivation or even several days of partial sleep deprivation. Interestingly, not all of the changes in immune physiology that occur as a result of sleep deprivation appear to be negative. Numerous medical disorders involving the immune system are associated with changes in the sleep-wake physiology--either being caused by sleep dysfunction or being exacerbated by sleep disruption. These disorders include infectious diseases, fibromyalgia, cancers, and major depressive disorder. In this article, we will describe the relationships between sleep physiology and the immune system, in states of health and disease. Interspersed will be proposals for future research that may illuminate the clinical relevance of the relationships between sleeping, sleep loss and immune function in humans.     

Light sleep and sleep time misperception – Relationship to alpha–delta sleep

ObjectiveWe investigated the association of alpha–delta sleep (A–DS) with: (1) perception of light sleep and (2) discrepancy between subjective and objective sleep duration.MethodsWe analyzed data from 5764 individuals who underwent polysomnography (PSG) and replied questions about quantity and quality of sleep, including sleep depth. The difference between objectively recorded sleep time and subjectively estimated sleep time was calculated. Alpha–delta sleep (A–DS) was visually scored in a scale from 1 to 4, based on the density and overnight duration of alpha activity and confirmed using spectral array of the electroencephalographic activity.ResultsA–DS scores 1–4 occurred in, respectively, 37.9%; 31.3%; 20.5%; and 6.2% of the cases. ANOVA showed significant difference of light sleep sensation (p < 0.001) and sleep time underestimation (p < 0.001) among the four A–DS categories. Regression to explain both light sleep and sleep time underestimation, controlling for confounders, confirmed A–DS as a significant regressor.ConclusionsThis study of a large prospective sample provides evidence for the association of alpha–delta sleep with subjective sensation of light sleep and with sleep time underestimation.SignificanceAlpha–delta sleep may be a marker of the physiological disorder underlying light sleep and sleep state misperception.     

Effects of sleep loss on sleep architecture in Wistar rats: gender-specific rebound sleep

This study was designed to examine the influence of gender on sleep rebound architecture after a 4-day paradoxical sleep deprivation period. After a 5-day baseline sleep recording, both male and female rats in different phases of the estrus cycle were submitted to paradoxical sleep deprivation for 96 h. After this period, the sleep rebound recording was evaluated for 5 days (one estrus cycle). The findings revealed that after paradoxical sleep deprivation, sleep efficiency and paradoxical sleep returned to baseline values on the second day of the light period, for all except the proestrus group. During the dark rebound period, only the female groups presented increased sleep efficiency on the first day. Paradoxical sleep returned to baseline values on the third day, except for males and the cycling females submitted to paradoxical sleep deprivation in the diestrus phase, whose baseline values returned to normal on the second day of rebound period. Thus, the females and males displayed distinct patterns as a result of sleep disruption.     

Nonrestorative sleep

The current review presents the empirical findings on varying definitions of nonrestorative sleep (NRS). Despite lacking a standard, operational definition, NRS is investigated in research studies and included in diagnostic manuals. However, because of the absence of standardization, the conclusions that can be drawn about NRS based on the current body of empirical literature are limited. A feeling of being unrefreshed upon awakening that is not accounted for by lack of sleep may occur among a substantial percentage of the population. This experience is correlated with daytime impairment, pain, fatigue, and electroencephalogram (EEG) arousals in non-REM sleep but causal links are unsubstantiated. An immediate converging of researchers toward NRS standardization is needed. We conclude that conceptualizing NRS as a primary symptom of insomnia on par with difficulty initiating sleep and difficulty maintaining sleep is empirically unsubstantiated. We recommend defining NRS as a report of persistently feeling unrefreshed upon awakening in the presence of a normal sleep duration, occurring in the absence of a sleep disorder.     

Heart rate variability, sleep and sleep disorders

Heart rate (HR) is modulated by the combined effects of the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. Therefore, measurement of changes in HR over time (heart rate variability or HRV) provides information about autonomic functioning. HRV has been used to identify high risk people, understand the autonomic components of different disorders and to evaluate the effect of different interventions, etc. Since the signal required to measure HRV is already being collected on the electrocardiogram (ECG) channel of the polysomnogram (PSG), collecting data for research on HRV and sleep is straightforward, but applications have been limited. As reviewed here, HRV has been applied to understand autonomic changes during different sleep stages. It has also been applied to understand the effect of sleep-disordered breathing, periodic limb movements and insomnia both during sleep and during the daytime. HRV has been successfully used to screen people for possible referral to a Sleep Lab. It has also been used to monitor the effects of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). A novel HRV measure, cardiopulmonary coupling (CPC) has been proposed for sleep quality. Evidence also suggests that HRV collected during a PSG can be used in risk stratification models, at least for older adults. Caveats for accurate interpretation of HRV are also presented.     

Genetic basis for sleep regulation and sleep disorders

Sleep disorders arise by an interaction between the environment and the genetic makeup of the individual but the relative contribution of nature and nurture varies with diseases. At one extreme are the disorders with simple Mendelian patterns of inheritance such as familial advanced sleep phase syndrome, and at the other extreme are diseases such as insomnia, which can be associated with a multitude of medical and psychiatric conditions. In this article, we review data on the relative contribution of genetic and environmental factors in the pathogenesis of various sleep disorders. The understanding of many of these disorders has been advanced by the study of sleep and circadian rhythms in model laboratory organisms. We summarize this model system research and how it relates to human sleep disorders. The current challenge in this field is the identification of susceptibility genetic loci for complex diseases such as obstructive sleep apnea. We anticipate such identification will increase our ability to assess risk for disease before symptom onset and by doing so will shift the focus from treatment to prevention of disease.     

Clinical effects of sleep fragmentation versus sleep deprivation

Common symptoms associated with sleep fragmentation and sleep deprivation include increased objective sleepiness (as measured by the Multiple Sleep Latency Test); decreased psychomotor performance on a number of tasks including tasks involving short term memory, reaction time, or vigilance; and degraded mood. Differences in degree of sleepiness are more related to the degree of sleep loss or fragmentation rather than to the type of sleep disturbance. Both sleep fragmentation and sleep deprivation can exacerbate sleep pathology by increasing the length and pathophysiology of sleep apnea. The incidence of both fragmenting sleep disorders and chronic partial sleep deprivation is very high in our society, and clinicians must be able to recognize and treat Insufficient Sleep Syndrome even when present with other sleep disorders.