共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
国家卫生健康委员会和国家中医药管理局发布的《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第六版)》首次提出可试用磷酸氯喹治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)。氯喹治疗病毒感染的作用机制包括通过pH依赖性抑制病毒穿入、脱壳等复制过程而发挥抑制病毒作用;通过干扰病毒黏蛋白与血管紧张素转化酶2的结合而发挥抑制病毒作用以及通过抑制肿瘤坏死因子α等炎性细胞因子表达和细胞自噬作用抑制炎性反应。氯喹治疗冠状病毒感染的研究多为体外试验,目前尚无该药用于COVID-19有效性和安全性评价的临床研究结果。氯喹可导致多个系统或器官的不良反应,包括心血管系统、眼、皮肤、消化系统、神经精神系统、内分泌系统、血液系统和耳等,而且与多种药物存在相互作用。本文对临床用药过程中的药学监护提出了具体建议。 相似文献
6.
新型冠状病毒即严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus2,SARS-CoV-2)是2019年12月在中国首次发现的一种新型病毒,其在全国范围内快速传播,造成了严重的新型冠状病毒肺炎(corona virus disease 2019,COVID-19)疫情。目前尚没有针对性的药物或疫苗可用于临床防治。洛匹那韦/利托那韦复方制剂(lopinavir and ritonavir compound,LPV/r;商品名:克力芝)是由艾伯维公司研发的一种临床已用于治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒1型感染的蛋白酶抑制剂,有临床研究证明其可显著降低SARS冠状病毒感染患者的死亡率。研究表明LPV/r可通过结合冠状病毒的3C样蛋白酶发挥抗冠状病毒作用。《新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案》(试行第六版)已推荐将其作为COVID-19治疗的试用药物,目前有13项基于LPV/r的干预治疗临床试验正在开展。本文就LPV/r的基本信息、作用机制和临床试验等情况作一概述。 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
目前还没有针对由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型引起的新型冠状病毒肺炎的特效药物或治疗方法。本文通过研究新型冠状病毒肺炎、肠道菌群及免疫系统之间的关系及肠道菌群影响新型冠状病毒肺炎的相关机制, 探究粪菌移植在新型冠状病毒肺炎治疗中的应用前景, 以期为治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎提供新的方法。 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
目的总结和概括1995~2007年中药复方抗运动性疲劳的研究概况和存在的问题,展望中药复方抗运动性疲劳的研究方向。方法:"运动性疲劳"、"复方"为关键词,检索中国期刊网1995~2007年的相关文献。结果共检索到63篇文献,其中22篇属于对中医药抗运动性疲劳的理论探讨和综述,剩余的41篇中剔除重复的研究,共有22篇文章是有关介绍中药复方消除运动性疲劳的研究。结论通过对22篇文章的综述,总结归纳了目前中药复方抗运动性疲劳的研究概况和存在的不足,并提出了对应的措施。 相似文献
13.
14.
The terms ‘alternative medicine’, ‘complementary medicine’ and ‘integrative medicine’ are of recent origin. According to Medline and PubMed, ‘alternative medicine’ first appeared in medical journals in 1975, when Nursing Times commenced a series of articles on topics such as transcendental meditation, spiritual healing and homeopathy. According to the same databases, the first appearance of ‘complementary medicine’ occurred in 1985, when The Lancet published an article titled ‘Complementary medicine in the United Kingdom’. ‘Integrative medicine’ was introduced in an English language journal in 1995, although it had appeared in German in an article 2 years earlier and in French already in 1951. Since the terms have no historical bearing whatsoever, we claim that they are used, together with many other slogans that thrive in contemporary Western health care, for ideological or commercial reasons to promote ideologies or to facilitate the selling of products and services. 相似文献
15.
Objective: Ginseng is one of the most popular herbal remedies, and a number of health claims are made for it. This systematic review
provides an evaluation of the current evidence for or against the efficacy of ginseng root extract.
Methods: Searches of the computerised literature databases Medline, Embase, Biosis, CISCOM and the Cochrane Library were performed
to retrieve double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trials of ginseng root extract for any indication. Manufacturers
and experts were contacted to provide additional information. There were no restrictions regarding the language of publication.
The outcome and methodological quality of all trials were independently assessed by two reviewers.
Results: Sixteen trials met the inclusion criteria and were reviewed. These trials related to physical performance, psychomotor performance
and cognitive function, immunmodulation, diabetes mellitus and herpes simplex type-II infections. The evidence found for ginseng
root extract is compelling for none of these indications.
Conclusion: Based on these data, it is concluded that the efficacy of ginseng root extract is not established beyond reasonable doubt
for any of these indications. The widespread use of ginseng as a herbal remedy warrants more rigorous investigations to assess
its efficacy and safety.
Received: 23 April 1999 / Accepted in revised form: 26 July 1999 相似文献
16.
17.
The treatment of eczema with Chinese herbs: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
AIMS: Chinese herbal treatments are being promoted as a treatment for eczema. The aim of this study was to systematically review the evidence for or against this notion. METHODS: Extensive literature searches were carried out to identify all randomised clinical trials on the subject. Data were extracted from these in a predefined standardized fashion. RESULTS: Only two randomized clinical trials were located. Both imply that a complex mixture of Chinese herbs is more effective than placebo in treating eczema. Yet several caveats exist, most importantly the lack of independent replication. Adverse effects have also been reported. CONCLUSIONS: At present it is unclear whether Chinese herbal treatments of eczema do more good than harm. 相似文献
18.
Yoo Seob Shin MD PhD Jung‐Won Park MD PhD Yong‐Won Lee MD MS Cheol‐Woo Kim MD PhD Hun‐Jong Dhong MD PhD Hae‐Sim Park MD PhD Young‐Joo Cho MD PhD Sang‐Heon Cho MD PhD Bok Yang Pyun MD PhD Kwang Hoon. Lee MD PhD Hae Ran Lee MD PhD Chein‐Soo Hong MD PhD 《Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety》2011,20(1):99-104
19.
《Expert opinion on drug safety》2013,12(1):79-124
Importance of the field: Healthcare practitioners are deeply concerned about drug–herb interactions and how concurrent administration may affect both the safety and effectiveness of prescribed drugs. Interactions between botanical medicines and synthetic drugs can be clinically relevant and it is important to understand what kinds of interactions are possible. Better knowledge in this area will help avoid negative interactions and may also help enable synergistic interactions.Areas covered in this review: Includes articles related to the investigation of Western botanicals or whole herbal extracts in human subjects, investigating either the impact on Cytochrome P450 isoenzymes or an assessment of specific drug–herb interactions within a clinical trial. Searches were conducted in both Pubmed and EMBASE from inception to March 2009.What the reader will gain: Knowledge regarding specific interactions to consider in clinical practice. The reader will also gain an appreciation of the complexities associated with the area of drug–herb interactions. Summary tables of relevant drug–herb interactions are presented both for the individual herbs included and at the level of the CYP450 enzymes.Take home message: Knowledge of drug–herb interactions is limited and much more research needs to be done to further document clinically relevant interactions. Even though preclinical data are often poorly generalizable to the human situation, caution must be taken in the absence of clinical evidence especially where drugs with narrow therapeutic windows are concerned. 相似文献