Discriminative stimulus properties of psychomotor stimulants in the cat

Cats were trained to choose between two levers of an operant chamber using interoceptive cues provided by d-amphetamine or saline as the discriminative stimuli. Following training, stimulus generalization was observed to additional doses of d-amphetamine and cocaine, but not to morphine. Clozapine blocked the generalization of the drug discrimination response to d-amphetamine, but had no effect on generalization to cocaine. These data indicate that discriminative stimulus properties of psychomotor stimulants, previously described in rats, are similar in cats.     

Dopamine D1 and D2 mediation of the discriminative stimulus properties ofd-amphetamine and cocaine

Evidence suggests that stimulants such asd-amphetamine and cocaine act presynaptically by increasing the amount of dopamine (DA) available to stimulate postsynaptic DA receptors. Since two subpopulations of DA receptors (D₁ and D₂) exist, we investigated the role of both of these receptor subtypes in mediating the internal state produced by these stimulants. Two groups of rats (N=8/group) were trained to discriminate intraperitoneal (IP) injections of eitherd-amphetamine (1 mg/kg) or cocaine (10 mg/kg) from saline in a two-lever, water-reinforced, drug discrimination task. After stable performance was established (i.e., more than 85% correct under each training condition), substitution and combination tests were conducted with selective D₁ and D₂ agonists and antagonists. The D₂ agonist quinpirole (0.0313–0.125 mg/kg) mimicked both stimulant cues while the D₁ agoinst SKF 38393 (5–20 mg/kg) substituted partially for cocaine but notd-amphetamine. Combination tests with DA antagonists indicated that both the D₁ antagonist SCH 23390 (0.0063–0.25 mg/kg) and the D₂ antagonist haloperidol (0.125–0.5 mg/kg) attenuated the effects of both stimulants; in addition, the substitution of cocaine (20 mg/kg) ford-amphetamine was blocked by both DA antagonists. The ability of both D₁ and D₂ antagonists to attenuate the stimulus effects ofd-amphetamine and cocaine raises the possibility that a synergistic (enabling) interaction between D₁ and D₂ receptors may modulate stimulant cues.     

Discriminative response control by d-amphetamine and related compounds in the rat

Rats were trained to discriminate between two levers utilizing drug-induced physiological states as discriminative stimuli. Drug injections were associated with reinforcement of response on one lever and saline was associated with reinforcement on the other lever. At equimolar doses, d- and l-amphetamine but not para-hydroxyamphetamine, functioned effectively as cues. Following training, stimulus generalization between these drugs was evaluated. Transfer of response control was observed between the d- and l-isomers, and between para-hydroxyamphetamine and saline in rats trained to utilize d- or l-amphetamine versus saline as cues. These findings suggest the importance of central pharmacological activity in this type of response control.This research was supported by National Institute of Mental Health Grant MH-19651.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of pentylenetetrazol and bemegride: Some generalization and antagonism tests

In an operant procedure of lever pressing on a FR 10 schedule of food reinforcement, male hooded rats were trained to respond with a lever on one side of a food cup following a drug injection, and to respond with a lever on the alternate side following a 1ml/kg saline injection. All of 14 subjects learned to discriminate reliably between the effects of 20 mg/kg pentylene-tetrazol (PTZ) and saline. Seven of eight rats learned to discriminate between the effects of bemegride (5 mg/kg) and saline. None of 14 rats learned to discriminate between 5 mg/kg PTZ and saline. The bemegride discriminative stimulus generalized to PTZ (20 mg/kg) and was antagonized by chlordiazepoxide (10 mg/kg). Chlordiazepoxide, diazepam, flurazepam, clobazam, and meprobamate were all effective antagonists of PTZ in a dose-dependent manner. Bemegride and cocaine generalized to the PTZ discriminative stimulus in a dose-dependent manner, but d-amphetamine, methylphenidate, and nicotine did not. Since bemegride and PTZ are convulsants at higher doses, the discriminative stimulus properties of these drugs might be based on a subtle convulsive brain state. The anxiolytic properties of benzodiazepines and meprobamate suggest that the discriminative stimulus produced by these convulsants is related to an anxiety-inducing action.     

The effect of pretreatment with iproniazid on the behavioral activities of Β-phenylethylamine in rats

Rats were trained on DRL 15-sec schedule to choose between two response levers in the operant chamber in order to obtain food pellet. Choice of lever depended upon intraperitoneal injection of either 0.8 mg/kg d-amphetamine sulfate or saline as cue for response. -Phenylethylamine HC1 (1 mg/kg) or iproniazid phosphate (100 mg/kg) alone did not produce the discriminative cue in the animals similar to d-amphetamine. However, with treatment of animals with iproniazid prior to the administration -phenylethylamine to prevent the metabolism of the latter, the discriminative cue similar to d-amphetamine can then be generated by 1 mg/kg of -phenylethylamine. Iproniazid (100 mg/kg) caused decreased spontaneous locomotor activity in rats while -phenylethylamine (1 mg/kg) did not affect this behavior. When animals were pretreated with iproniazid for 3 h, -phenylethylamine could not increase spontaneous locomotor activity as d-amphetamine produced. It is probable that the amphetamine-like increase in motor activity produced by -phenylethylamine was masked by iproniazid which was shown to decrease spontaneous locomotor activity.     

The effect of training dose on discrimination of compound drug-exteroceptive stimuli

Rats were trained to discriminate between two compound stimulus arrays that included exteroceptive (ES) and interoceptive (IS) stimulus components. The ES components were illumination and tactile cues, and the IS components were produced by d-amphetamine (A) or Na pentobarbital (P) treatment (drug versus drug discrimination). The relative ES-IS strength was then determined by testing with mismatched stimulus arrays consisting of combinations of ES and IS components that had not been presented simultaneously during training. Additional tests were done with ES only (no drug treatments). At training doses of 0.8 mg/kg A versus 10 mg/kg P, the ES were less salient than, but did share stimulus control with, the stronger IS components. In a second group, trained with lower doses (0.5 mg/kg A versus 4 mg/kg P), the ES were much more salient than the IS, although again, both types of stimuli did acquire some control. This dose-related sharing of stimulus control between ES and IS components is similar to relationships among components of compound arrays consisting entirely of ES, and thus further illustrates similarity between drug-produced and exteroceptive stimuli.     

An analysis of some discriminative properties of d-amphetamine

Male albino rats were trained and tested on a two-lever discrimination task based upon the presence or absence of d-amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg). This compound was found to produce strong discriminative cues (i.e., 90% correct choice behavior). A dose-effect function was then ascertained and the discriminative ED₅₀ (following training with 1.0 mg/kg) was found to be 0.23 mg/kg d-amphetamine.In order to determine the effective duration of d-amphetamine action, the interval between injection and testing was varied; it was found that the discriminative effects of the drug began to dissipate between 60 and 90 min post-injection.In an attempt to compare the discriminative cues of other drugs with those of d-amphetamine, injections of LSD (0.04 and 0.08 mg/kg), psilocybin (0.50 and 1.0 mg/kg), THC (0.50 and 1.0 mg/kg), mescaline (5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg), and caffeine (6.0 and 20.0 mg/kg) were given during extinction. In all cases, the rats responded predominantly on the saline-related lever. Only methamphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) produced d-amphetamine-like responding.Finally, alpha-methyl-para-tyrosine (AMPT), a compound which depletes brain catecholamines (CA), was found to disrupt the d-amphetamine-saline discrimination.     

Similarities between the stimulus properties of phenylpropanolamine and amphetamine

Rats at 80% body weight were trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine versus saline in a two-lever, discrete trial drug discrimination task to obtain food pellets. After reliable discriminative control of lever choice was established, various doses of d,l-phenylpropanolamine (PPA, i.e., d,l-norephedrine) were substituted for the amphetamine training dose in non-reinforced test trials. Test doses of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg PPA resulted in over 90% responses on the amphetamine-appropriate lever. Lower doses (1.25, 2.5, and 5.0 mg/kg) resulted in predominantly saline-appropriate responses. The generalization seen after the 20 mg/kg dose of phenylpropanolamine was blocked by pretreatment with 0.5 mg/kg haloperidol, suggesting that the generalization from amphetamine to PPA was mediated by a dopaminergic mechanism.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of d-amphetamine-pentobarbital combinations

Pigeons were trained to discriminate IM injections of 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine from water, 5.6 mg/kg pentobarbital from water, or 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine from 5.6 mg/kg pentobarbital by requiring them to peck different response keys depending on which substance was administered prior to the session. Excellent stimulus control was achieved under all conditions with close to 100% of the responses occurring on the injection-correlated key. In tests with doses different from those used in training, the percentage of responses on the drug key was directly related to drug dose. When d-amphetamine was given to birds trained to discriminate pentobarbital from water or when pentobarbital was given to birds trained to discriminate d-amphetamine from water, responding occurred predominately on the water-correlated key. d-Amphetamine produced a dose-related antagonism of the effects of pentobarbital for birds trained to discriminate pentobarbital from water or from d-amphetamine. Rates of responding on the drug key were generally highes after administration of the drug doses used in discrimination training; but response rates were not systematically related to the percentage of responses occurring on the drug key. All birds were subsequently trained to discriminate a combination of 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine and 5.6 mg/kg pentobarbital from either 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine or 5.6 mg/kg pentobarbital alone, demonstrating that the discriminative stimulus properties of amphetamine-pentobarbital combinations are different from either drug alone. Several of the drug effects reported were related to the drug discrimination that had been established.Portions of this paper were reported at the 49th annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1978     

Discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine and d-amphetamine,and antagonism by haloperidol: A comparative study

This paper presents a comparative study of the discriminative stimulus properties of cocaine and d-amphetamine in the rat. Using a discrete-trial, food-reward, two-lever drug discrimination procedure, one group of rats (n = 7) were trained to discriminate 10 mg/kg cocaine from saline, whereas 1.25 mg/kg d-amphetamine served as a cue to a second group (n = 6). Following training, stimulus generalization gradients were determined for cocaine and d-amphetamine in both groups, and so were the antagonistic effects of haloperidol vs the training drug conditions. The results indicate that the acquisition of discrimination proceeded at a comparable rate in the two groups. In both groups, d-amphetamine was about 5 times more potent than cocaine, and individual threshold doses for the two drugs showed a significant correlation. Haloperidol appeared equally effective in antagonizing 1.25 mg/kg d-amphetamine and 10 mg/kg cocaine. These findings converge to suggest that to a large extent the cueing properties of d-amphetamine and cocaine are similar.     

Role of specific dopamine receptor subtypes in amphetamine discrimination

Biochemical, electrophysiological, and behavioral experiments suggest that the dopamine D-1 and D-2 receptor subtypes functionally interact. In rats trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine, substitution with the D-2 agonist quinpirole (0.1–2.0 mg/kg) produces amphetaminelever responding, whereas the D-1 agonist SKF 38393 (0.3–10.0 mg/kg) elicits only saline-appropriate responding. Combining either quinpirole (0.05–0.5 mg/kg) or SKF 38393 (0.5–10.0 mg/kg) with 0.3 mg/kg d-amphetamine results in dose-dependent increases in amphetamine-lever responding. Conversely, the D-1 antagonist SCH 23390 (0.02–0.1 mg/kg) antagonizes the discrimination produced by 0.7 mg/kg d-amphetamine. Additional combination studies examined the effect of DA receptor drugs on discrimination when quinpirole is substituted in d-amphetamine trained rats. SKF 38393 (0.5–7.0 mg/kg) fails to increase the amphetamine-appropriate lever response produced by either 0.05 or 0.2 mg/kg quinpirole. Similarly, SCH 23390 (0.01–0.1 mg/kg) fails to antagonize the amphetamine-lever responding produced by either 0.2 or 0.5 mg/kg quinpirole. Haloperidol (0.02–0.2 mg/kg) does antagonize the amphetamine-appropriate response produced by quinpirole substitution. The d-amphetamine discrimination studies indicate that stimulating D-2 receptors alone or D-1 receptors in the presence of d-amphetamine yields d-amphetamine-lever responding, and suggests that D-1/D-2 receptors can functionally interact to alter discrimination behavior. Quinpirole substitution, on the other hand, shows an insensitivity to D-1 receptor manipulations.     

Interaction between d-amphetamine and ethanol with respect to locomotion,stereotypies, ethanol sleeping time,and the kinetics of drug elimination

The interaction between d-amphetamine and ethanol with respect to locomotor activity, stereotyped behavior, and sleeping time was investigated in rats. Ethanol 0.8 g/kg i.p. enhanced and prolonged locomotor activity produced by d-amphetamine 1 mg/kg s.c. The increased motility after 5 mg/kg d-amphetamine was not influenced by alcohol 0.8 g/kg i.p. or 3.2 g/kg orally, but slightly protracted. Stereotyped head and paw movements as well as stereotyped licking, were distinctly strengthened and protracted by 3.2 g/kg ethanol orally. The modified d-amphetamine motility and stereotypies can be explained by alcohol-induced prolongation of the life of d-amphetamine. The effect is produced by alcohol's inhibition d-amphetamine p-hydroxylation in rat liver. After 3.2 g/kg ethanol i.p., the sleeping time of male rats amounted to 153 min. Simultaneous administration of 5 mg/kg d-amphetamine s.c. reduced the sleeping time to 84 min. This is obviously based on a central antagonism.     

Potentiation of morphine analgesia by d-amphetamine

Rats were trained to escape from aversive electrical brain stimulation delivered to the mesencephalic reticular formation (MRF). The threshold for this escape behavior was determined by a modification of the classic psychophysical method of limits. Escape thresholds were determined after the administration of morphine alone, d-amphetamine alone, and the combination of d-amphetamine and an ineffective dose of morphine. Morphine alone caused a dose-dependent raising of the escape threshold (1.0–16.0 mg/kg IP) while d-amphetamine alone (0.06–2.0 mg/kg IP) had no effect or caused a slight lowering of threshold. For each animal, a dose of morphine that produced no change in escape threshold was then selected to be administered concomitantly with various doses of d-amphetamine. The co-administration of morphine and d-amphetamine resulted in a significant, dose-dependent increase in the escape threshold, which was not seen with d-amphetamine alone and was as great or greater in magnitude than the increase seen with the highest dose of morphine tested. The results of this study clearly demonstrate that opiate analgesia is potentiated by concomitant d-amphetamine administration. The mechanisms involved in this potentiation warrant further investigation for the clinical management of pain.     

Enhanced behavioural control by conditioned reinforcers following microinjections of d-amphetamine into the nucleus accumbens

Stimulant drugs have been shown to enhance the control over behaviour exerted by stimuli previously correlated with primary reinforcers, termed conditioned reinforcers (CR). Experiment 1 examined the possible neuroanatomical specificity of the enhancement of conditioned reinforcement following intracerebral injections ofd-amphetamine. Thirsty rats were trained to associate, a light with water. In the test phase, water was no longer presented but the light (CR) was intermittently produced by responding on one of two novel levers. Rats with bilateral guide cannulae aimed at the nucleus accumbens, posterior caudate nucleus, or medio-dorsal nucleus of the thalamus received four counterbalanced microinfusions ofd-amphetamine (10, 20, 30 g/2 l) or vehicle (control) over 4 test days. There was a dose-dependent selective increase in responding on the lever that produced the light (CR) with intra-accumbensd-amphetamine infusions. Quantitatively similar, but much more variable effects were found with intra-caudate infusions and no effects following intra-thalamicd-amphetamine. Experiment 2 provided evidence that the enhanced control over responding by a CR with intra-accumbensd-amphetamine is behaviourally specific. Three groups of rats received a compound tone — plus —light stimulus that was positively, negatively or randomly correlated with water during training. Intra-accumbensd-amphetamine produced selective increases in responding only if the contingent stimulus had been positively correlated. The results suggest that the nucleus accumbens may play an important role ind-amphetamine's enhanced control over behaviour exerted by conditioned reinforcers.     

Effects of d- and l-amphetamine on habituation and sensitization of the acoustic startle response in rats

In a series of 3 experiments the effects of 2, 4, 8, or 16 mg/kg d-amphetamine and 4, 8, 16, or 32 mg/kg l-amphetamine on acoustic startle amplitude in the rat were investigated. d-Amphetamine was 4–5 times as potent as l-amphetamine in augmenting startle amplitude. Startle potentiation was associated with vigorous stereotypies but the resultant cage movement could not account for the change in startle. Pretreatment with -methyl-p-tyrosine (100 mg/kg, 1 hr before) had only a slight depressant effect on startle but essentially eliminated augmentation of startle by either d-amphetamine (8 mg/kg) or l-amphetamine (32 mg/kg). d-Amphetamine did not have a direct effect on startle but instead enhanced sensitization produced by the startle stimuli without altering sensitization produced by background white noise or habituation. The results suggest that startle sensitization is enhanced by increased availability of catecholamines and, by virtue of the different potencies of the d- and l-isomers, that dopamine and norepinephrine may affect startle differently.     

Intravenous self-administration of cocaine and norcocaine by dogs

The potency of cocaine, relative to d-amphetamine, to initiate and maintain intravenous self-administration behavior by dogs (n=5) was determined. Response-contingent infusions of cocaine (at unit doses of 0.15, 0.30 and 0.60 mg/kg/infusion) and d-amphetamine (at unit doses of 0.05 and 0.10 mg/kg/infusion) were available during daily 4-h sessions on a FR1 reinforcement schedule. By comparing the dose-response curves of the two drugs, it was found that 1 mg of amphetamine is equivalent to 5.3 mg of cocaine (95% confidence limits=3.8–9.1 mg). In a second experiment, pretreatment with the -adrenergic antagonist phenoxybenzamine (in doses ranging from 0.125–2.0 mg/kg, IV) did not produce any appreciable changes in responding for cocaine (0.2 mg/kg/infusion) by dogs (n=9). In contrast, when the same animals were pretreated with the dopaminergic antagonist pimozide (in doses ranging from 5–40 mg/kg, IV), subsequent responding for cocaine was increased in a dose-dependent manner. In a third experiment it was determined that norcocaine, the N-demethylated metabolite of cocaine, would maintain self-administration behavior by dogs (n=4) when it was substituted for cocaine. As expected, when saline was substituted for cocaine, responding was not maintained.A preliminary report of these studies was presented at the 61st Annual Meeting, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, April 1977 (Fed. Proc. 36: 1040, 1977)     

6-Hydroxydopamine lesions of the nucleus accumbens,but not of the caudate nucleus,attenuate enhanced responding with reward-related stimuli produced by intra-accumbens d-amphetamine

Intra-accumbens d-amphetamine enhances responding for reward-related stimuli (conditioned reinforcers, CRs), whereas intra-caudate d-amphetamine has only weak and variable effects (Taylor and Robbins 1984). The present experiment further examined the involvement of the nucleus accumbens and the role of dopamine (DA) in this effect. Thirsty rats were trained to associate a flash of a light and movement of a dipper (CR) with water. After implantation of permanent guide cannulae aimed at the nucleus accumbens, they were assigned to one of four groups, receiving either bilateral 6-OHDA (4 mg/ml free base in 2 1 0.1% ascorbic acid/0.9% saline) or sham (vehicle) infusions into the nucleus accumbens or the caudate nucleus. In the test phase, two novel levers were available. Responding on one lever (CR lever) produced the light and dipper stimuli without water presentation, whereas responding on the other (NCR lever) had no effect. All four groups received four counterbalanced intra-accumbens infusions of d-amphetamine (3, 10, 20 g/2 l) or vehicle. On the 5th test day, subjects were pretreated subcutaneously with apomorphine (0.1 mg/kg). Intra-accumbens d-amphetamine in both sham-lesioned groups produced a dose-dependent increase in responding on the CR lever, but no significant change on the NCR lever. No selective increases in responding on either lever were found in animals with 6-OHDA-induced depletion of DA (>80%) in the nucleus accumbens following intra-accumbens d-amphetamine; however, in subjects with DA depletion of the posterior caudate nucleus (>80%), increases in responding on the CR lever were observed to be similar in magnitude to those of both the sham-lesioned groups. Following systemic administration of apomorphine, only rats in the nucleus-accumbens-lesioned group continued to respond, preferring the CR lever, thus suggesting the involvement of DA receptors in these effects. These results indicate that enhanced responding for CR following administration of psychomotor stimulant drugs is critically dependent on dopaminergic activation of the nucleus accumbens, rather than the caudate nucleus.     

d-amphetamine and adjunctive drinking in rats

In the first experiment four food-deprived rats developed high levels of adjunctive water drinking during daily sessions of intermittent food pellet delivery. When the water was removed and a solution of d-amphetamine sulfate (0.01 mg/ml) put in its place, adjunctive drinking was disrupted towards the end of each session although the rats ingested doses of approximately 0.5 mg/kg daily for over 40 sessions. Consumption of the d-amphetamine solution was increased by injections of several doses of -methyl-p-tyrosine (AMPT). In a second experiment injections of d-amphetamine (0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/kg) were found to reduce adjunctive water consumption in six rats. It was also found that the actions of the two highest doses of d-amphetamine were reduced by pretreatment with a dose of AMPT (100 mg/kg), which itself slightly reduced levels of drinking. These results suggest that, although adjunctive drinking may be a useful technique for inducing rats to self-administer d-amphetamine, the amount of drug consumed is limited by a direct action of the drug on drinking.     

Interactions of naloxone with morphine,amphetamine and phencyclidine on fixed interval responding for intracranial self-stimulation in rats

Rats were implanted with stimulating electrodes aimed at the medial forebrain bundle-lateral hypothalamus (MFB-LH) and were trained to lever-press for brain self-stimulation on a fixed interval: 60 s schedule of reinforcement. The effects of graded doses of naloxone (0.1–30 mg/kg), morphine (0.3–5.6 mg/kg), naloxone plus morphine,d-amphetamine (0.03–1.0 mg/kg), naloxone plusd-amphetamine, phencyclidine (0.3–5.6 mg/kg), and naloxone plus phencyclidine were tested. Naloxone produced a significant decrease in rates at 30 mg/kg. Naloxone (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) plus morphine blocked the dose-dependent decrease produced by morphine alone. In contrast, naloxone (1.0–10 mg/kg) plusd-amphetamine attenuated the graded increase in response rates produced byd-amphetamine. Naloxone (1.0–10 mg/kg) plus phencyclidine did not reliably change the increase in response rates produced by phencyclidine alone. The use of the fixed interval schedule of brain self-stimulation to study these drug interactions is novel, and further demonstrates that the highly reinforcing aspects of brain stimulation, known to be influenced by dopamine, may also be modulated by the endogenous opiate system.     

Discriminative stimulus properties of valproic acid in the pigeon

Pigeons were successfully trained to discriminate 60 mg/kg valproic acid from saline using a two-key drug discrimination procedure. When 5–80 mg/kg doses of valproic acid were administered during generalization tests the percentage of responses directed to the valproic acid-appro-priate key varied directly with dose. the effects of administering the training dose of valproic acid at presession injection intervals ranging from 15 to 120 min were described by an inverted U-shaped function; the 30-min interval used during discrimination training engendered the largest percentage of valproic acid-appropriate responses. The discriminative stimulus properties of valproic acid failed to generalize to the anticonvulsant compounds phenobarbital (10, 20 mg/kg), phenytoin (2.5, 5 mg/kg), and ethosuximide (40, 80 mg/kg), indicating that not all anticonvulsant compounds share similar discriminative properties. Clonazepam (0.25, 0.50 mg/kg) and diazepam (1, 2 mg/kg), two benzodiazepines with anticonvulsant properties, produced quite different effects. The stimulus properties of valproic acid generalized to all doses of clonazepam, whereas intermediate generalization was evident with diazepam. Pentylenetetrazol (10, 20 mg/kg), chlorpromazine (5, 10 mg/kg), tripelennamine (2.5, 5.0 mg/kg), d-amphetamine (0.5, 1.0 mg/kg), morphine (1.25, 2.50 mg/kg), and imipramine (2.5, 5.0 mg/kg) induced only saline-like patterns of responding. The concomitant administration of pentylenetetrazol failed to antagonize the discriminative stimulus properties exerted by the training dose of valproic acid.