吸入装置的演变过程及研究进展

吸入装置通过不同的气溶胶发生原理,结合相应的药物形态形成了现有的药械组合式吸入制剂,目前已广泛应用于吸入治疗领域。但在临床使用过程中也逐渐暴露出一些问题,如患者使用压力定量吸入气雾剂(pressurized metered-dose inhaler,pMDI)时协调性不够,使用干粉吸入剂(dry powder inhaler,DPI)时吸力不足,患者使用依从性差等。新型吸入装置致力于通过装置性能的改善弥补吸入装置目前存在的缺点,并结合智能化和云端管理扩展功能等,提高患者的使用依从性,从而进一步提高临床治疗效果。     

Novolizer: how does it fit into inhalation therapy?

Inhalation therapy is the preferred route of administration of anti-asthmatic drugs to the lungs. However, the vast majority of patients cannot use their inhalers correctly, particularly pressurised metered dose inhalers (pMDIs). The actual proportion of patients who do not use their inhalers correctly may even be under-estimated as GPs tend to over-estimate correct inhalation technique. Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) have many advantages over pMDIs. Unlike pMDIs, they are environmentally-friendly, contain no propellant gases and, more importantly, they are breath-activated, so that the patient does not need to coordinate actuation of the inhaler with inspiration. Three key parameters for correct inhaler use should be considered when evaluating existing or future DPI devices and especially when choosing the appropriate device for the patient: (1) usability, (2) particle size distribution of the emitted drug and (3) intrinsic airflow resistance of the device. The Novolizer is a breath-activated, multidose, refillable DPI. It is easy to use correctly, has multiple feedback and control mechanisms which guide the patient through the correct inhalation manoeuvre. In addition, the Novolizer has an intelligent dose counter, which resets only after a correct inhalation and may help to monitor patient compliance. The Novolizer has a comparable or better lung deposition than the Turbuhaler at similar or higher peak inspiratory flow (PIF) rates. A flow trigger valve system ensures a clinically effective fine particle fraction (FPF) and sufficient drug delivery, which is important for a good lung deposition. The FPF produced through the Novolizer is also relatively independent of flow rate and the device shows better reproducibility of metering and delivery performance compared to the Turbuhaler. The low-to-medium airflow resistance means that the Novolizer is easy for patients to use correctly. Even children, patients with severe asthma and patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have no problems to generate the trigger inspiratory flow rate required to activate the Novolizer. The Novolizer uses an advanced DPI technology and may improve patient compliance.     

干粉吸入剂的研究进展

干粉吸入剂（DPI）具有独特的吸收方式和药动学特点,与定量气雾剂相比优点突出。粉体工学性质和给药装置设计一直是制约该剂型发展的重要因素。近十几年来随着药物微粉化技术和新型给药装置研究的不断进步,其应用范围越来越广,在国际药物制剂研发方面呈快速发展趋势。现参考国内外研究文献,对DPI给药方式的药物作用特点、DPI药物及载体粉末性质以及目前吸入装置的种类及主要特点等进行综述。     

The inhalation manager: a new computer-based device to assess inhalation technique and drug delivery to the patient.

The rational choice of an inhalation device is a cornerstone in the effective management of asthma and COPD. In this publication, we describe the development of a new system, the Inhalation Manager, which, for the first time, offers the possibility to assess the entire inhalation maneuver of patients using original devices under everyday conditions. So far the Inhalation Manager allows the measurement of inspiratory maneuvers of patients through placebo inhalation devices of the most common breath-actuated CFC-free inhalers in the market for the three main glucocorticosteroids Budesonide [Turbohaler (TH), dry powder inhaler (DPI)], Beclomethasone dipropionate [Autohaler (AH), breath-actuated pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI)], and Fluticasone propionate [Diskus (DI), DPI] by means of a pneumotachometer. In addition, it allows allocation of the individual maneuver to the expected drug delivery values (mass output and particle size distribution) of these three devices. In a field trial, the inhalation technique of 628 (TH), 794 (AH), and 795 (DI) patients, respectively, was tested in 72 pulmonologist practices with the Inhalation Manager. For patients in the 18-59-year-old group, the Inhalation Manager detected the following percentages needing improvement: 1.5% for the Autohaler device, 16.7% for the Diskus, and 38.9% for the Turbohaler. In the 60-99-year-old group, percentages needing improvement were 1.5%, 31.5%, and 66.1% for the Autohaler, Diskus, and Turbohaler, respectively. Therefore, the Inhalation Manager could become an essential tool in asthma management by finding the most suitable inhaler for an individual patient and by training the optimal inhalation technique.     

Carriers in drug powder delivery

The performance of dry powder inhaler (DPI) systems depends on the design of the powder formulation, the dose-metering system, and the device used to disperse the powder as an aerosol. Multiple factors associated with drug and carrier particles are known to influence dry powder performance. Elucidation of a mechanistic understanding of particulate system properties and how these relate to powder performance and the disruption of inter-particulate forces that cause aggregation has not yet been achieved. However, the complexity of interactions within dry powder formulations has not restricted research in this area. Various strategies of overcoming inter-particulate forces have been devised, ranging from active inhaler designs to powder engineering approaches. The influence of the interactive carrier system’s physicochemical properties (i.e. size, shape, chemical properties, surface roughness, electrostatics, humidity, and ternary excipients) on the performance of carrier-based systems has been examined extensively in the literature. In addition, matrix carriers, which contain drug and functional excipients for promotion of powder performance, control of pharmacokinetics, stability, controlled release of active drug and enhanced control of drug targeting, have also been investigated. Both the interactive carrier and matrix carrier approaches are attempts to develop DPI systems that perform as device-independent formulations and/or provide patient-independent delivery (controlled carrier systems). It seems likely that the future of DPI systems will combine both of these strategies with future developments in device design (formulation independency).     

Physico-chemical aspects of lactose for inhalation

A dry powder inhaler (DPI) is a dosage form that consists of a powder formulation in a device which is designed to deliver an active ingredient to the respiratory tract. It has been extensively investigated over the past years and several aspects relating to device and particulate delivery mechanisms have been the focal points for debate. DPI formulations may or may not contain carrier particles but whenever a carrier is included in a commercial formulation, it is almost invariably lactose monohydrate. Many physicochemical properties of the lactose carrier particles have been reported to affect the efficiency of a DPI. A number of preparation methods have been developed which have been claimed to produce lactose carriers with characteristics which lead to improved deposition. Alongside these developments, a number of characterization methods have been developed which have been reported to be useful in the measurement of key properties of the particulate ingredients. This review describes the various physicochemical characteristics of lactose, methods of manufacturing lactose particulates and their characterization.     

Effect of inhalation flow rate on the dosing characteristics of dry powder inhaler (DPI) and metered dose inhaler (MDI) products.

Both the dose delivered from the device and the particle size of the medication are important parameters for inhalation products because they influence the amount of drug that is delivered to the patient's lung. The inspiratory flow rate may vary from dose to dose in a given patient and between patients. The Marple-Miller Cascade Impactor, a new multistage inertial impactor that operates at two flow rates (30 and 60 liters/min) with comparable particle size cut-offs, provides a means to study the effect of inhalation flow rate on the particle size distributions of inhalation products. The medication delivery, mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD), and fine particle mass were determined, in a randomized fashion, for albuterol, beclomethasone, budesonide, and terbutaline in both metered dose inhaler (MDI) and dry powder inhaler (DPI) products as a function of flow rate. In all cases, independent of drug or device used, the MDI products had a more reproducible respirable dose than the breath-actuated DPI products tested as a function of inhalation flow rate.     

Highly reproducible powder aerosolisation for lung delivery using powder-specific electromechanical vibration

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) have been in use since the 1970s, but it is only within the past few years that their use has constituted > approximately 10% of the inhaler units sold worldwide. Similarly, active DPIs have been in development for more than a decade, but no active device has yet been approved. Oriel is developing an active DPI technology that uses a very simple physical design coupled with a complex knowledge of powder flow and dispersion characterisation. The DPI uses electromechanical vibration with frequencies determined through the analysis of powder flow properties. Results so far have shown highly reproducible, efficient performance. The technology lends itself to both unit-dose and multidose platforms in a targeted cost-effective DPI.     

Highly reproducible powder aerosolisation for lung delivery using powder-specific electromechanical vibration

Dry powder inhalers (DPIs) have been in use since the 1970s, but it is only within the past few years that their use has constituted > ～ 10% of the inhaler units sold worldwide. Similarly, active DPIs have been in development for more than a decade, but no active device has yet been approved. Oriel is developing an active DPI technology that uses a very simple physical design coupled with a complex knowledge of powder flow and dispersion characterisation. The DPI uses electromechanical vibration with frequencies determined through the analysis of powder flow properties. Results so far have shown highly reproducible, efficient performance. The technology lends itself to both unit-dose and multidose platforms in a targeted cost-effective DPI.     

Adherence monitoring in drug delivery

Adherence monitoring is an important issue in inhaled drug delivery. Adherence is commonly found to be low and poor adherence is associated with increased mortality and morbidity and increased use of health services. Improving adherence is essential to maintaining disease and symptom control for patients and decreasing health costs. Feedback on actual adherence has been shown to increase subsequent adherence. In addition, education programs, reminder systems and increased patient–clinician interaction can also improve adherence. However, improved adherence is not sufficient if inhalation devices are being used incorrectly; the emphasis must be on devices being used in accordance with both the prescribed regimen and the instructions for use. As a result of technological advancements, drug delivery devices that both monitor adherence and address poor inhaler technique are now available. These devices combine monitoring systems with various feedback mechanisms in order to ‘coach’ the patient to use the device correctly. Some devices also incorporate connectivity to communicate accurate adherence and inhaler technique data to the clinician. This editorial considers current and future adherence monitoring devices and the impact that such technology could have on improving the patient's adherence and inhaler technique.     

Novel dry powder inhaler particle-dispersion systems

Dry powder inhalers are a diverse family of devices that have emerged as a rapidly growing segment of the respiratory therapeutics area. The forces that these devices must impart into dry powder formulations for effective dispersion performance and reproducibility of delivery are relatively large, and multiple mechanisms have been developed in attempts to improve the efficiency of these systems. In this review, we address the reasons for the proliferation of dry powder inhalers, beginning with an abbreviated introduction on the basic inter-particulate forces that need to be disrupted to achieve successful powder dispersion and effective lung delivery. From this background, we survey the diversity of inhaler designs, starting from marketed devices, before introducing some of the novel device designs under development, both patient driven (passive) and device driven (active), as we attempt to link the themes of the device design features to the present understanding of the dynamics governing powder dispersion. Finally, we conclude by providing some assessment on the future of the wide range of device designs and mechanisms that have evolved by considering technical, regulatory and market forces.     

影响干粉吸入剂雾化和沉积性能的制剂因素

干粉吸入剂是近年来肺部给药制剂研发的热点。随着微粉化技术不断成熟,新型给药装置日益涌现,干粉吸入剂的应用范围越来越广。本文从微粉化的药物、载体和干粉吸入器等3个方面综述了干粉吸入剂的处方组成,并重点介绍了影响药物粉末雾化和沉积性能的几个关键因素。     

Inhalation devices for long-acting β2-agonists: efficiency and ease of use of dry powder formoterol inhalers for use by patients with asthma and COPD

ABSTRACT

Background: Since the long-acting β₂-agonist bronchodilator, formoterol, first became available for the treatment of subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), generic forms of this agent have been launched in a variety of devices. It is timely to review the characteristics of the original dry powder delivery device, the single-dose Aerolizer, its in vitro performance and its comparability with other inhaler devices that are now available for delivery of formoterol.

Scope: This review focuses on the performance of the formoterol Aerolizer inhaler in comparison with other inhalers. Publically available data (PubMed) on the device performance characteristics of the Aerolizer were reviewed and summarized, together with the results of comparative studies performed by the authors. Published studies (PubMed) on patient handling and inhaler technique that include the Aerolizer are described and studies comparing the clinical effect of formoterol in the Aerolizer with formoterol delivered via other devices were reviewed and are summarized.

Findings: The Aerolizer performs consistently in dosing efficiency across a range of inspiratory flow rates, suggesting its suitability for use by patients with differing inspiratory flow abilities. The single-dose, capsule-based nature of the device provides patients with obvious feedback on whether the drug has been taken successfully and the Aerolizer has been shown to be one of the more easily used devices in comparative patient handling studies. Studies comparing the clinical effect of formoterol delivered by different inhalation devices show that formoterol via Aerolizer has an equivalent therapeutic effect.

Conclusion: Judged on the basis of dosing efficiency, ease of use and clinical equivalence, formoterol Aerolizer remains a useful option in the management of patients with asthma or COPD.     

Liquid-spray or dry-powder systems for inhaled delivery of peptide and proteins?

Non-invasive delivery systems are desirable for routine administration of therapeutic protein and peptides. The large absorptive surface area of the lungs, thin alveolar epithelial barrier, and extensive vasculature makes the pulmonary route a promising option. For many years, drug delivery to the lungs has been achieved by nebulizers and metered dose inhalers. Two rapidly expanding fields of aerosol drug delivery are liquid-spray systems and dry-powder delivery systems. The selection of an aerosolization system for protein and peptide active compounds will be driven by several inter-related factors that include: physicochemical properties of the macromolecule, the principle of aerosolization of the device, and patient- and disease-related properties. Although novel liquid spray systems may have aerosol and delivery advantages over current inhalation aerosol technologies, rigorous scientific evaluation has not yet been performed due to the relatively recent introduction of these systems. Alternatively, dry-powder inhaler systems for protein and peptide therapeutics have undergone significantly more scientific evaluation. Dry-powder systems for protein and peptide therapeutics may have stability and sterility advantages. However, with currently used excipients and passive dispersion mechanisms, these devices are relatively inefficient. A convergence of improved particle manufacturing methods and technologies with active dispersion technologies may lead to more efficient delivery options. Alongside these delivery considerations, issues pertaining to economic viability, regulatory approval, and patient factors are equally important for selection of an appropriate delivery system. Thus, with our current understanding, there is no acceptable decision tree or algorithm that can be used to derive the most appropriate device technology for inhaled protein and peptide therapy. This review aims to provide guidance to select the best formulation alternative to deliver a candidate protein/peptide drug through the pulmonary route.     

On the use of dry powder inhalers in situations perceived as constrained.

Dose delivery from dry powder inhalers (DPIs) are dependent on the inhalation effort of the patient. Some patient groups, including asthmatic children, patients with acute asthma, and patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are perceived as having problems in readily inhaling from a DPI in an efficient way; this opinion is based on alleged low inhalation flows. A review of the literature however shows that these groups can use a DPI in an efficient way and gain good clinical effect from its use. Particularly, it has been shown that children can generate a good peak inhalation flow through a DPI, albeit a lower inhaled volume. Similarly, patients with acute asthma can use a DPI in an efficient way, even reaching a better clinical effect with the DPI than with a pressurized metered dose inhaler with a spacer. Finally, it was shown that patients with severe COPD can generate the inhalation flows needed to generate an efficient drug aerosol from a DPI. Collectively, the discussed patient groups seem to perform as well as other subjects when it comes to their ability to generate an adequate inhalation flow through a DPI.     

A dry powder inhaler with reduced mouth-throat deposition.

A novel, compact, and highly efficient dry powder inhaler (DPI) with low mouth-throat deposition is described. The performance of this DPI was evaluated by measuring both (1) the total aerosol deposition in and distal to an idealized mouth-throat cast and (2) the fine particle fraction (FPF) using a standard Mark II Anderson impactor. Ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy techniques were used in the aerosol deposition measurements. Two inhalation aerosol powders, namely budesonide (extracted from a Pulmicort/Turbuhaler multi-dose device, 200 microg/dose) and ciprofloxacin + lipid + lactose (in-house), were dispersed by the DPI at a steady inhalation flow rate of 60 L/min. The newly developed DPI had a total aerosol delivery distal to the mouth-throat cast of 50.5% +/- 3.04% and 69.7% +/- 1.5% for the budesonide and ciprofloxacin + lipid + lactose aerosols, respectively. This is a significant improvement over the Turbuhaler original device delivery of 34.5% +/- 5.2%, particularly considering that in vitro mouth-throat deposition dropped from 27.5% +/- 5.4% with the budesonide Turbuhaler to 11.0% +/- 3.5% with the present inhaler. The different lung deliveries from the same inhaler for the two formulations above also confirm that the overall performance of an inhaler is optimizable via powder formulations.     

Inhaled corticosteroid delivery systems: clinical role of a breath-actuated device

Several devices have been developed to overcome the need to co-ordinate actuation with inhalation required during use of a pressurised metered dose inhaler (MDI) and to improve drug delivery to the lung. These include spacer attachments for MDIs, dry powder inhalers and breath-actuated MDIs. The breath-actuated Autohaler (3M Pharmaceuticals) is a compact, multidose inhaler device that, unlike dry powder inhalers, does not rely on the patient's inspiratory effort to aerosolise the dose of medication. Due to its simple operation, the Autohaler is suitable for patients unable to operate a conventional MDI efficiently, including the elderly, children, patients with arthritis and patients with low inspiratory flow rates. The mandatory replacement of chlorofluorocarbon propellants with non-ozone-depleting propellants has given the opportunity to improve drug delivery characteristics of MDIs. Recently, a formulation of beclomethasone dipropionate in hydrofluoroalkane-134a (HFA-BDP), has been developed in a conventional MDI that delivers most of the emitted dose to the lung. Drug deposition studies show that the HFA-BDP formulation in the Autohaler device has a similar lung deposition pattern to drug delivered from the MDI, when used correctly, and dose delivery is consistent across a wide range of inspiratory flow rates. Furthermore, HFA-BDP Autohaler has similar clinical benefits to CFC-BDP Autohaler but at less than half the dose. HFA-BDP Autohaler offers a useful CFC-free delivery option for patients challenged by the conventional MDI device.     

New treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and viable formulation/device options for inhalation therapy

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an increasingly important cause of morbidity and mortality, pathological features of which are pulmonary inflammation and irreversible airflow obstruction. Current therapies for COPD are aimed at improvement of clinical symptoms and reduction of inflammation in the respiratory systems. There is a pressing need for the development of new COPD medication, particularly as no existing treatment has been shown to reduce disease progression. In spite of a better understanding of the underlying disease process, there have been limited advances in the drug therapy of COPD, in contrast to the enormous advances in asthma management. Several new therapeutic targets and strategies have been proposed, and new drug candidates, including bronchodilators, protease inhibitors anti-inflammatory drugs and mediator antagonists, are now in clinical development for COPD treatment. New dry powder inhaler (DPI) systems for inhaled COPD therapy have also been developed to maximize drug concentrations in the airway systems, while minimizing systemic exposure and associated toxicity. This article aims to review recent developments in COPD drugs and the delivery systems for inhalation therapy, with particular emphasis on device options and formulations of DPI systems.     

Rationale for the choice of an aerosol delivery system.

The choice of an aerosol delivery system depends on numerous factors such as the drug itself, the characteristics of the aerosol generator, the patient and his or her disease, the physician, and the clinical setting, notably an emergency situation or not. Some rules always apply: an ultrasonic nebulizer should not be used to aerosolize a drug suspension; whenever possible, the same type of aerosol generator should be used for all inhaled medications received by a given patient; for outpatients, education is a major factor to ensure treatment efficacy. When the deposition of the aerosolized drug is aimed at the terminal respiratory units, nebulizers that generate micronic aerosols should be chosen. When the deposition of the aerosolized drug is aimed at the conducting airways, the metered dose inhaler (MDI) is the first choice. However, the MDI is often ill-used, notably in children and elderly people. Therefore, other inhalation devices have been developed: spacers, dry-powder inhalers, breath-actuated MDIs and, more recently, piezo-electric devices. They have been shown to increase lung deposition of drugs in poor coordinators but they all have limitations, which may affect their clinical efficacy. These limitations include the cumbersome dimensions of spacers, the dependency of lung deposition of dry powders on the inspiratory flow rate, the need for reformulation of breath-actuated or not MDIs with CFC-free gases. Nebulization of drugs should be considered only when no portable device is available for the considered drug, or in case of failure of other forms of aerosol administration.     

A critical comparison of the dose delivery characteristics of four alternative inhalation devices delivering salbutamol: pressurized metered dose inhaler, Diskus inhaler, Diskhaler inhaler, and Turbuhaler inhaler.

Salbutamol is a short-acting beta 2 agonist which is effective as a rescue therapy in the treatment of asthma. This study uses in vitro test methods to compare the capability of four alternative devices to deliver an accurate and precise dose of salbutamol. It is demonstrated that the conventional metered dose inhaler (MDI) achieves excellent accuracy and precision in dose delivery. Additionally, it is the most efficient inhaler in terms of generating in-vitro a fine particle fraction from the dose. A spacer device has been shown to further enhance the dosing characteristics. When tested over a wide range of inspiratory air flow rates, the Diskus (GlaxoWellcome, Hertfordshire, UK) has comparable accuracy and precision to the MDI tested at 60 L/min, and it offers an advantage over two alternative dry powder inhalers (DPIs), delivering a more consistent dose across the range of flow rates tested and being more efficient at generating a fine particle fraction than either Turbuhaler (Astra, Lund, Sweden) or Diskhaler (GlaxoWellcome) at both 28 and 60 L/min inspiratory flow rates. Diskus, Diskhaler, Ventolin, Volumatic, and Rotadisk are trademarks of the GlaxoWellcome Group of companies. The Accuhaler is the alternative to the Diskus in those countries where the Diskus trademark is not available. Inspiryl and Turbuhaler are trademarks of the Astra Group of companies.