Comparison of clinical and radiographic status around immediately loaded versus conventional loaded implants placed in patients with type 2 diabetes: 12‐ and 24‐month follow‐up results

There are no studies that have compared the clinical and radiographic status around immediately loaded (IL) and conventional loaded (CL) implants placed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim was to compare the clinical and radiographic status around IL and CL implants placed in T2DM patients. One hundred and eight diabetic patients [55 with IL implants (Group 1) and 53 with CL implants (Group 2)] were included in this cross‐sectional study. All implants were placed in healed sites in the maxillary and mandibular premolar and molar regions and supported single restorations. All patients underwent full mouth mechanical debridement biannually. Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, clinical [bleeding on probing (BOP) and probing depth (PD) ≥ 4 mm] and radiographic [crestal bone loss (CBL)] peri‐implant parameters were measured for both groups at 12‐ and 24‐month follow‐up. Group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U‐test (P < 0·05). The mean age and duration of T2DM in groups 1 and 2 were 50·6 ± 2·2 and 51·8 ± 1·7 years, and 9·2 ± 2·4 and 8·5 ± 0·4 years, respectively. At 12‐ and 24‐month follow‐up, the mean HbA1c levels in groups 1 and 2 were 5·4% (4·8–5·5%) and 5·1% (4·7–5·4%) and 5·1% (4·7–5·2%) and 4·9% (4·5–5·2%), respectively. At 12‐ and 24‐month follow‐up, there was no statistically significant difference in peri‐implant BOP, PD and CBL in both groups. It was concluded that clinical and radiographic status is comparable around IL and CL implants placed in patients with T2DM. The contribution of careful case selection, oral hygiene maintenance and glycaemic control is emphasised.     

Critical horizontal dimensions of interproximal and buccal bone around implants for optimal aesthetic outcomes: a systematic review

Objective: This systematic review was initiated to explore the critical horizontal interproximal and buccal bone dimensions around implants for an optimal aesthetic outcome.
Materials and methods: Pubmed, the Cochrane and the ISI web of Science databases were searched to identify eligible human studies that reflect on the aesthetic outcome of implants in relation to the thickness of the buccal bone after osteotomy preparation, and in relation to the tooth-to-implant or interimplant distance. Vertical bone dimensions were not considered.
Results and discussion: Articles relating horizontal buccal bone dimensions to aesthetic outcome could not be retrieved. The relation between horizontal buccal bone dimensions and vertical bone resorption could also not be confirmed. In relation to horizontal interproximal bone dimensions, some uniformity was detected among the limited number of articles.
Conclusions: Interproximally, a 3 mm interelement distance seems to result more frequently in an adequate papillary fill. In the bucco-oral direction, there is insufficient evidence to set a threshold for minimal buccal bone thickness to ensure an optimal aesthetic outcome. Many additional factors appear to be of importance and interact with each other.     

A prospective,multi‐center study assessing early loading with short implants in posterior regions. A 3‐year post‐loading follow‐up study

Background

Few prospective studies about early loading of short implant have been available and very little evidence exists on the outcomes longer than 3 years.

Purpose

To assess clinical and radiographic outcomes of 6 mm‐short implants placed in the posterior maxilla and mandible applying an early loading protocol.

Materials and methods

Ninety‐five short implants (6 mm‐short, Ø 4 mm) were placed in 45 subjects at 3 study sites, 2 or 3 implants per subject, using a one‐stage surgical procedure and loaded with a screw‐retained splinted fixed prosthesis 6 weeks later. Follow‐up took place at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after loading. Marginal bone level changes, implant survival, clinical variables, and adverse events were assessed.

Results

The survival rate for all implants placed was 95.8%. From implant loading to 3 years follow‐up, mean marginal bone level changes were minimal (0.07 ± 0.49 mm) and the peri‐implant soft tissue status was healthy. No major technical or biological complications occurred except for the 4 early implant losses.

Conclusion

Three‐year data indicates that the use of splinted 6 mm‐short implants is a viable treatment in posterior regions with low marginal bone resorption. Early loading after 6 weeks should be taken cautiously in patients with known risk factors.     

Implants in fresh extraction sockets: a prospective 5‐year follow‐up clinical study

Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the 5‐year clinical outcome of the ‘immediate implants.’ Material and methods: One week after the cementation of the prosthesis, a clinical baseline examination was carried out. Clinical measurements were performed of the following: plaque, mucositis, probing pocket depth, and soft tissue position. The height of the keratinized mucosa was measured at the buccal/lingual aspects. Standardized intra‐oral radiographs were taken. The marginal level of bone to implant contact [radiographic (Rx) bone level] was measured, and Rx bone level change over time was evaluated. The clinical/radiographic measurements were repeated on a yearly basis. The subjects were enrolled in a carefully supervised oral hygiene program. Results and conclusion: It was demonstrated that ‘immediate implants’ that were loaded after 5–7 months had a high success rate. During the 5‐year interval, no implant was lost, and the mean Rx bone level at the implants was maintained or even improved. The plaque and mucositis scores were low (<20%) at baseline and at all re‐examinations. Implant sites located adjacent to the teeth showed bone gain during the initial period while sites that were facing edentulous zones lost some bone.