陈旧胸锁关节脱位1例

患者,男,26岁,10年前行走时不慎摔倒,左肩部着地受伤,伤后即感左胸部疼痛剧烈,左上肢不能随意活动,休息后症状缓解,未行特殊治疗;此后自觉左胸前异响,未见肢体麻木、疼痛等不适。入院2周前,患者异响症状加重,间断性出现左侧面部麻木、胸闷症状,在外院行X线检查显示左胸锁关节明显分离(见图1)。患者遂至西安交通大学附属红会医院住院治疗,入院诊断为“陈旧左胸锁关节脱位”。查体:左胸锁关节可见凸起畸形,并可触及明显活动感。入院完善术前常规检查,在全身麻醉下行左胸锁关节脱位切开复位、异体韧带重建胸锁关节、空心钉内固定术。术后前臂吊带悬吊固定3周,术后8 h即可适当活动肘及腕关节;术后6周后基本恢复正常活动。术后6个月复查CT显示左胸锁关节固定良好。术后8个月随访,患者肩关节活动度正常,左胸锁关节未见疼痛及异常弹响,术后恢复满意。     

钢板内固定治疗胸锁关节脱位

2009年1月-2010年11月,我科采用钢板内固定治疗胸锁关节脱位9例,疗效满意。1材料与方法1.1病例资料本组9例,男7例,女2例,年龄25-42（32±2.5）岁。脱位程度采用Grade分型：Ⅱ型3例,Ⅲ型6例。左侧4例,右侧5例。前脱位8例,后脱位1例。病程3 h-7 d。     

带线锚钉修复喙锁韧带对肩锁关节脱位术后疼痛的影响

目的 探讨带线锚钉修复喙锁韧带对肩锁关节脱位患者术后肩关节疼痛的影响.方法 回顾性分析2017年2月～2020年6月本科开展手术治疗的45例RockwoodⅢ-V型肩锁关节脱位患者临床资料,依据术中是否接受喙锁韧带修复,分为两组:喙锁韧带修复组(观察组)22例,单纯钩钢板组(对照组)23例.记录两组患者的手术时间、术中...     

Ipsilateral sternoclavicular joint anterior dislocation with fracture of the mid shaft of the clavicle

Even though fractures of the clavicle are very common but fracture of the shaft of clavicle associated with sternoclavicular joint dislocation is extremely rare. This is a case report of a 50-year old woman who met with a road accident. Radiographs revealed right mid shaft clavicle fracture with inferior angulation of fracture fragments, anterior dislocation of sternoclavicular joint. The sternoclavicular joint was stabilized with sutures whereas the midshaft fracture was managed non-operatively. In postoperative period the sternoclavicular joint was found stable whereas the shaft clavicle united completely after 6 months.     

LCP钢板内固定加植骨治疗陈旧性胸锁关节脱位

目的 探讨LCP钢板内固定加植骨治疗陈旧性胸锁关节脱位的可行性。方法 采用LCP钢板内固定加植声治疗陈旧性胸锁关节脱位5例。结果 5例均得到随访,时间6～18个月。胸锁关节均按期融合,根据R晶kwood评分法进行评分15例均达13分以上,效果为优。无感染、疼痛及畸形发生。结论 LCP钢板内固定加植骨治疗陈旧性胸锁关节脱位疗效可靠。     

经骨缝合与缝合锚钉技术在内侧髌股韧带双束重建术中应用的比较研究北大核心CSCD

目的探讨经骨缝合术在内侧髌股韧带(medial patellofemoral ligament,MPFL)双束重建术中应用的效果。方法回顾分析2014年1月—2017年12月收治且符合选择标准的75例复发性髌骨脱位患者临床资料,均采用MPFL双束重建术治疗,根据术中固定技术分为研究组(39例,新型经骨缝合术)和对照组(36例,传统缝合锚钉固定)。两组患者性别、年龄、身体质量指数、患膝侧别以及术前胫骨结节-滑车沟距离、Insall-Salvati比值、膝关节活动度、Kujala评分、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分、适合角、倾斜角等一般资料比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。记录并比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、术后并发症等情况。手术前后采用Kujala评分、IKDC评分及膝关节活动度评价患者功能改善情况;于X线片上测量适合角、倾斜角。结果两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者均获随访,随访时间24~36个月,平均29.4个月。随访期间均未出现切口感染、脂肪液化,髌骨再脱位及髌前疼痛等并发症。末次随访时,两组患者Kujala评分、IKDC评分、膝关节活动度、适合角和倾斜角均较术前显著改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论应用缝合锚钉固定或经骨缝合术完成MPFL双束重建均可恢复髌骨稳定性,二者术后近期疗效无明显差异。     

TightRope重建喙锁韧带联合锚钉治疗肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效

目的：探讨TightRope重建喙锁韧带联合锚钉修复肩锁关节治疗肩锁关节脱位的疗效。方法回顾性分析2013年5月至2015年5月于我院采用TightRope重建喙锁韧带联合锚钉修复肩锁关节治疗的13例肩锁关节脱位病人（TightRope+锚钉组）及采用肩锁钩钢板治疗的21例肩锁关节脱位病人（肩锁钩钢板组）的临床资料,比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后及末次随访时的X线片及术后3、6个月及末次随访时的Neer肩关节功能评分。结果两组的手术时间、术中出血量比较,差异均无统计学意义（均P＞0.05）。在术后3、6个月及末次随访时,TightRope+锚钉组的Neer肩关节功能评分分别为（84.5±8.1）分、（91.8±9.4）分、（96.1±11.1）分,而肩锁钩钢板组的相应得分分别为（72.4±7.5）分、（86.9±9.6）分、（89.2±9.8）分,TightRope+锚钉组明显优于肩锁钩钢板组,差异均有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）。末次随访时的X线片提示TightRope+锚钉组病人无复位丢失、创伤性关节炎等出现;肩锁钩钢板组出现4例肩峰下撞击征,1例肩峰骨溶解,所有病人均在8~10个月后取出内固定,2例病人取出钢板后出现复位丢失。结论采用TightRope重建喙锁韧带联合锚钉修复肩锁关节治疗肩锁关节脱位,可获得更符合生物力学的复位,肩锁关节稳定,肩关节功能恢复满意,无需二次手术取出内固定。     

Arthroscopic Bankart revision using all suture anchor in recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation: A case report

IntroductionArthroscopic Bankart revision after recurrent shoulder dislocation is still a matter of discussion. Several factors are contributing to this injury. Recently the development of all suture anchors has grown in popularity in arthroscopic stabilization. It was proven to preserve bone stock, smaller in size thus more anchors can be made.Presentation of caseWe presented a case of 27-year-old woman with recurrent anterior dislocation after seven years of arthroscopic Bankart repair. Seven years before, we performed Bankart repair using three 2.8 mm fiber-wire anchor (FASTak® (Arthrex, Karsfield Germany)). For the revision surgery we performed arthroscopic revision using four all suture anchor technique (Y-Knot® Flex All-Suture Anchor, 1.3 mm – One strand of #2 Hi-Fi® (Conmed, New York)).DiscussionFrom preoperative and intraoperative assessment, we found no anchor failure and no massive bony lesion. To preserve the bone stock we insert four all suture anchors between the old anchor. One year post-operative follow up showed that patient could gain normal range of movement. No early or late complications were observed.ConclusionCompared to the conventional metallic anchor, all suture anchor has the same biomechanical strength. Moreover due to its relatively small size, it can reserve bone stock and more anchors can be made thus adding more stability to the shoulder.     

应用外固定支架治疗不稳定性胸锁关节脱位

胸锁关节脱位在临床比较少见,仅占肩胛带损伤的3%,诊断治疗却比较困难,尤其是不稳定性胸锁关节脱位,复发率高,手术并发症多而严重。自2003年1月-2005年12月,应用外固定支架治疗不稳定性胸锁关节脱位6例,取得了满意的效果,现报告如下。1临床资料本组6例,男5例,女1例;年龄18~45岁;左侧2例,右侧4例,皆为新鲜脱位。受伤原因:车祸撞击伤4例,运动伤1例,骑车摔跌伤1例。其中,G radeⅢ型[1]胸锁关节脱位5例,RockwoodⅤ型[2]肩锁关节脱位1例,皆为不稳定性脱位。合并伤2例,包括同侧肩锁关节脱位、肱骨外科颈骨折、肋骨骨折。主要症状及体征:6例均有明…     

Superior sternoclavicular dislocation: A case report

IntroductionSternoclavicular dislocations are difficult to diagnose and often missed.Anterior dislocations are more common than posterior dislocations and typically have a low risk of complications.Presentation of caseWe report the third case of post-traumatic superior sternoclavicular dislocation, which was successfully treated by functional treatment.DiscussionThe sternoclavicular joint is a diarthrodial joint with three degrees of freedom that is relatively immobile and incongruent.The treatment strategy for these injuries is based on two criteria: the possibility of vascular, nerve or tracheal compression such as in posterior dislocations, which is a surgical indication because of potential risk to life and function; the second indication is to improve esthetics, which is especially a concern with anterior dislocations.ConclusionSuperior sternoclavicular dislocation is a rare condition, with only three published cases up to now. Functional treatment can be used without complications.     

胸锁钩钢板内固定治疗创伤性胸锁关节前脱位的疗效观察

目的 探讨胸锁钩钢板内固定治疗创伤性胸锁关节前脱位的作用及临床疗效.方法 2002年5月至2009年10月,采用自行设计制造的胸锁钩钢板内固定治疗创伤性胸锁关节前脱位患者66例,男47例,女19例;年龄21～68岁,平均32.6岁;左侧25例,右侧41例.受伤原因:交通伤40例,压砸伤21例,摔伤5例.根据Allman分型:Ⅲ型31例,Ⅱ型35例;其中胸锁关节前脱位合并锁骨胸骨端骨折41例.受伤至手术时间3～62 d,平均7.5 d.Rockwood等胸锁关节评分标准对患者术后功能进行评价.结果 手术时间20～48 min,平均33 min;术中出血20～90ml,平均60 ml;术后无一例发生神经、血管损伤;切口均一期愈合.术后X线片及CT扫描示胸锁关节复位满意.66例患者均得到随访,随访时间12～37个月,平均17个月.末次随访时无一例患者发生胸锁关节再脱位和内固定失效.胸锁钩钢板均于术后12个月取出.Rockwood等胸锁关节评分为8～15分,平均为13.2分,其中优50例、良15例、可1例,优良率为98.5%.结论 胸锁钩钢板治疗创伤性胸锁关节前脱位手术安全,固定可靠,术后能允许肩胛带早期进行功能锻炼.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate the clinical outcomes of sternoclavicular hook plate in treatment of the anterior sternoclavicular joint dislocation. Methods A new device named sternoclavicular hook plate was devised by our team. Between May 2002 and Octorber 2009, 66 patients with sternoclavicular joint anterior dislocation were treated with the new device, among whom there were 47 males and 19 females,aged 21-68 years old (average, 32.6 years old). Twenty-one cases were caused by crush injury, 5 cases by falling and 40 cases by traffic accident. Anterior fracture-dislocation was found in 41 cases. According to the Allman system, there were 35 cases of type Ⅱ and 31 cases of type Ⅲ. Patients were evaluated with serial clinical and radiographic examinations. Rockwood score were used after the operation to assess the curative effect. Results The average operative time was 33 min (range, 20-48 min). The mean blood loss was 60 ml (range, 20-90 ml). There were no vascular or peripheral nerve injuries in the patients. All incisions healed smoothly. The X-ray and CT showed that the reduction of sternoclavicular joint and the location of internal fixation were satisfactory. All the 66 patients were followed up for 12-37 months (average, 17 months). There was no internal fixation failure, redislocation or other complications. The sternoclavicular hook plate was removed 12 months after operation. The mean Rockwood's score was 13.2 (8 to 15). There were excellent in 50cases, good in 15 cases, and fair in 1 case. Conclusion The sternoclavicular hook plate is a new, safe and liable technique for sternoclavicular fracture-dislocation. This new technique is helpful for early functional exercises.     

A modified surgical technique for reconstruction of an acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation

We report a modified surgical technique for reconstruction of coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligaments after acute dislocation of acromioclavicular joint using suture anchors. We have repaired 3 consecutive type III acromioclavicular dislocations with good results. This technique is simple and safe and allows anatomical reconstruction of the ligaments in acute dislocations.     

An in-vitro study of rotator cuff tear and repair kinematics using single- and double-row suture anchor fixation

Purpose:

Double-row suture anchor fixation of the rotator cuff was developed to reduce repair failure rates. The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of simulated rotator cuff tears and subsequent repairs using single- and double-row suture anchor fixation on three-dimensional shoulder kinematics. It was hypothesized that both single- and double-row repairs would be effective in restoring active intact kinematics of the shoulder.

Materials and Methods:

Sixteen fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulder specimens (eight matched pairs) were tested using a custom loading apparatus designed to simulate unconstrained motion of the shoulder. In each specimen, the rotator cuff was sectioned to create a medium-sized (2 cm) tear. Within each pair, one specimen was randomized to a single-row suture anchor repair, while the contralateral side underwent a double-row suture anchor repair. Joint kinematics were recorded for intact, torn, and repaired scenarios using an electromagnetic tracking device.

Results:

Active kinematics confirmed that a medium-sized rotator cuff tear affected glenohumeral kinematics when compared to the intact state. Single- and double-row suture anchor repairs restored the kinematics of the intact specimen.

Conclusions:

This study illustrates the effects of medium-sized rotator cuff tears and their repairs on active glenohumeral kinematics. No significant difference (P ≥ 0.10) was found between the kinematics of single- and double-row techniques in medium-sized rotator cuff repairs.

Clinical Relevance:

Determining the relative effects of single- and double-row suture anchor repairs of the rotator cuff will allow physicians to be better equipped to treat patients with rotator cuff disease.     

Fastin骨锚固定治疗创伤性胸锁关节前脱位的初步疗效分析

目的 探讨应用Fastin骨锚固定治疗创伤性胸锁关节前脱位的技术,并分析其初步疗效.方法 对2006年3月至2008年4月应用Fastin骨锚固定的14例创伤性胸锁关节前脱位患者的临床资料及手术结果进行回顾性分析,男9例,女5例;年龄21～46岁(平均35岁),术前通过X线片和CT确诊.手术先将胸锁关节复位后用克氏针临时固定,然后于胸骨柄拧入骨锚,骨锚尾部缝线穿过锁骨内侧端并牢固打结.术后3周取出克氏针,进行肩关节功能锻炼.结果 14例患者术后均获12～22个月(平均17个月)随访.随访期间无关节的复位丢失和内固定松动,肩关节功能按Rockwood标准评定:优11例,良3例.结论 Fastin骨锚能够可靠固定胸锁关节脱位,避免了长期滞留克氏针造成的潜在危险,有利于关节功能的恢复.     

带线锚钉与锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效比较

目的 比较带线锚钉与锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位的优缺点。方法 将自2010-09-2012-08收治的53例新鲜肩锁关节脱位随机分为2组：A组,29例,采用锁骨钩钢板内固定;B组,24例,在喙锁韧带和肩锁韧带处采用3枚带线锚钉内固定。结果 所有患者获得随访12-18个月。A组和B组的平均手术时间分别为（52.0±10.1）min和（56.0±15.3）min。术后1年,肩关节功能恢复参照Constant Murley评定标准,A组和B组的优良率分别82.8%（24/29）和87.5%（21/24）（P〈0.05）;其中A组出现10例肩峰下撞击征,1例内固定松动;B组出现2例内固定锚钉松动（P〈0.01）。结论 对于肩锁关节脱位,2种固定方法都能获得满意的疗效。锁骨钩钢板固定强度较高,但存在肩峰下撞击征及需要再次拆除内固定等缺点;采用3枚带线锚钉固定,手术技能要求较高,具有术后并发症少、无需拆除内固定等优点。     

胸锁关节的CT研究

目的 了解正常胸锁关节、锁骨胸骨端和胸骨柄在CT图像上的径线长度,确定由内固定物向胸骨柄钻孔的安全角度和长度.方法 对50名健康志愿者的胸锁关节进行CT扫描成像,成像角度包括矢状面、冠状面和横断面.测量锁骨近端的高度与前后径、锁切迹的长度与前后径、锁切迹与胸骨的成角、胸骨柄与身体长轴的成角、胸骨柄的厚度、胸锁关节间隙大小以及锁骨间距.并确定由内固定物向胸骨柄钻孔的安全角度和长度结果左、右侧的各项测量指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).冠状面上胸骨柄锁切迹的长度和锁骨内侧端的长度接近,差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).横断面上锁切迹的前后径比锁骨内侧端的前后径短,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).胸骨后方重要组织中,头臂干、左右头臂静脉贴近胸骨柄的后缘,术中应以安全角度(α＞46°β＜-49°)进钻,或将进钻深度控制在安全深度(2.38±0.61)cm以内.结论 本研究明确了 CT图像上正常胸锁关节的特征,并定量描述了胸骨柄与其后方重要组织的伴行关系,对胸锁关节脱位的诊断与治疗提供了参考.

Abstract：

Objective To investigate anatomical features of the sternoclavicular joint on computed tomography (CT) scans to determine the safe angle and length of drilling into the manubrium sterni for implants. Methods CT scans were taken in 50 healthy human volunteers.Reconstructive images on coronal,sagittal and transverse planes of the sternoclavicular region,from the superior border of the clavicle to the sternal angle,were obtained.Measurements were conducted on the images to determine the height and the anteroposterior dimension of the proximal end of the clavicle,the length and the anteroposterior dimension of the clavicular notch,the angle between the clavicular notch and the sternum,the angle between the manubrium sterni and the trunk,thickness of the manubrium sterni and the distance between the bilateral clavicles.The safe angle and length of drilling into the manubrium sterni for implants were determined.Results There were no significant differences between the above left and right measurements (P＞ 0.05).There were no significant differences in length between the clavicular notch and the internal extremity of clavicle on the coronal image (P＞0.05).The anternposterior dimension of the clavicular notch was significantly shorter than that of the internal extremity of clavicle on the cross section ( P ＜ 0.05 ).Of the tissues behind the sternum,the anonyma and the bilateral innominate veins were the nearest to the manubrium sterni.The safe angle and length of drilling into the manubrium sterni for implants were α ＞ 46° or β ＜-49° and 2.38 ± 0.61 cm respectively. Conclusion This investigation provides specific and quantitative CT data of the sternoclavicular joint which may help clitical diagnosis and treatment of the sternoclavicular dislocation.     

TwinFix带线锚钉辅助改良Kessler法修补陈旧性跟腱断裂

目的 探讨TwinFix带线锚钉辅助改良Kessler法修补陈旧性跟腱断裂的临床疗效.方法 采用TwinFix带线锚钉辅助改良Kessler法修补陈旧性跟腱断裂患者11例,术中用改良Kessler法对位缝合跟腱断端,再用2枚TwinFix带线锚钉辅助固定断裂跟腱.术后予患侧下肢屈膝90°、踝跖屈30°位长腿石膏托固定,3周后改踝跖屈石膏托固定.结果 11例均获随访,时间3～18个月.患者均未发生切口延期愈合、感染、皮肤坏死和跟腱再断裂等并发症.采用Arner-Lindholm评分标准评价疗效:优7例,良3例,差1例.结论 TwinFix带线锚钉辅助改良Kessler法手术操作简便,是修补陈旧性跟腱断裂的有效方法.     

缝合锚钉治疗踝关节三角韧带附着点断裂疗效观察

目的评价缝合锚钉治疗踝关节三角韧带附着点断裂的临床疗效。方法采用锚钉系统治疗29例三角韧带附着点断裂患者,其中距骨附着点断裂24例,内踝附着点断裂5例。结果 29例均获得随访,时间9~26个月。踝关节功能采用美国足踝外科学会(AOFAS)踝-足评分标准评价:优17例,良10例,可2例,优良率27/29;按照改良Baird-Jackson评分系统评价:优17例,良9例,可3例,优良率为26/29。结论缝合锚钉治疗踝关节三角韧带附着点断裂,其有操作简便易行、可提供踝关节内侧即刻稳定性、利于韧带修复、疗效可靠等优点,是治疗三角韧带附着点断裂的有效方法。     

Comparison of pullout button versus suture anchor for zone I flexor tendon repair

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome after repair of zone I flexor tendon injuries using either the pullout button technique or suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2002 we treated 26 consecutive zone I flexor tendon injuries. Thirteen patients had repairs from 1998 to 2000 using a modified pullout button technique (group A) and 13 patients had repair using suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx (group B). Patient characteristics were similar for both groups. The same postoperative flexor tendon rehabilitation protocol and follow-up schedule were used for both groups. Evaluation included range of motion, sensibility and grip strength, failure, complications, and return to work. The Student t test was used to determine significant differences. RESULTS: All patients completed 1 year of follow-up evaluation. There were 2 infections in group A that resolved with oral antibiotics and no infections in group B. There were no tendon repair failures and no repeat surgeries in either group. At final follow-up evaluation there were no statistically significant differences for the following end points: sensibility (Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing and 2-point discrimination), active range of motion (at the proximal interphalangeal joint, distal interphalangeal joint, or their combined motion), flexion contracture (at the proximal interphalangeal joint, distal interphalangeal joint, or their combined contracture), and grip strength (injured tendon as a percent of the contralateral uninjured tendon). The suture anchor group had a statistically significant improvement for time to return to work. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the clinical outcome after flexor tendon repair using either suture anchors or the pullout button technique. A significant improvement was found for time to return to work for repairs using the suture anchor technique. Flexor tendon repair can be achieved using suture anchors placed in the distal phalanx, thereby avoiding the potential morbidity associated with the pullout button technique. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, Level III.     

踝关节内侧韧带损伤的治疗

目的 探讨带线锚钉修补踝关节内侧韧带损伤的临床疗效.方法对18例踝关节内侧韧带结构损伤的患者行切开带线锚钉修补手术.结果 18例均得到随访,时间12～24个月.X线片显示胫距关节间隙正常.Baird踝关节功能评分为91～98（93.44±4.91）分,优12例,良6例.结论 带线锚钉修补踝关节内侧韧带损伤操作简单,可以避免踝关节不稳,疗效良好.