Screening 500 unselected neurofibromatosis 1 patients for deletions of the NF1 gene

A total of 500 unselected unrelated neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) patients were screened for deletions of the NF1 gene. After excluding 67 patients with known intragenic NF1 mutations, the remaining 433 were genotyped using six intragenic and one distal microsatellite marker for the NF1 gene. A total of 28 patients were hemi- or homozygous for all seven markers and were thus considered as candidates for NF1 deletion with a calculated probability of 99.99%. Metaphase or interphase cells were available from 23 of these 28 individuals for molecular cytogenetics. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) confirmed an NF1 deletion in 22 (96%) of the 23 patients. Thus, a constitutional deletion of the NF1 gene is responsible for the disease phenotype in at least 4.4% of the 500 unselected NF1 patients. Genotyping using multiple microsatellite markers may provide a simple, inexpensive, and efficient strategy for screening deletions of the NF1 gene, and can as well be applied for other large genes.     

Tissue-specific differences in the proportion of mosaic large NF1 deletions are suggestive of a selective growth advantage of hematopoietic del(+/-) stem cells

Type-2 NF1 deletions spanning 1.2 Mb are frequently of postzygotic origin and hence tend to be associated with mosaicism for normal cells and those harboring the deletion (del(+/-) cells). Eleven patients with mosaic type-2 deletions were investigated by FISH and high proportions (94-99%) of del(+/-) cells were detected both in whole blood and in isolated CD3+, CD14+, CD15+, and CD19+ leukocytes. Significantly lower proportions of del(+/-) cells (24-82%) were however noted in urine-derived epithelial cells. A patient harboring an atypical large NF1 deletion with nonrecurrent breakpoints was also found to have a much higher proportion of del(+/-) cells in blood (96%) than in urine (51%). The tissue-specific differences in the proportions of del(+/-) cells as well as the X chromosome inactivation (XCI) patterns observed in these mosaic patients suggest that the majority of the deletions had occurred before or during the preimplantation blastocyst stage before the onset of XCI. We postulate that hematopoietic del(+/-) stem cells present at an early developmental stage are characterized by a selective growth advantage over normal cells lacking the deletion, leading to a high proportion of del(+/-) cells in peripheral blood from the affected patients.     

Mosaic type-1 NF1 microdeletions as a cause of both generalized and segmental neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF1)

Mosaicism is an important feature of type-1 neurofibromatosis (NF1) on account of its impact upon both clinical manifestations and transmission risk. Using FISH and MLPA to screen 3500 NF1 patients, we identified 146 individuals harboring gross NF1 deletions, 14 of whom (9.6%) displayed somatic mosaicism. The high rate of mosaicism in patients with NF1 deletions supports the postulated idea of a direct relationship between the high new mutation rate in this cancer predisposition syndrome and the frequency of mosaicism. Seven of the 14 mosaic NF1 deletions were type-2, whereas four were putatively type-1, and three were atypical. Two of the four probable type-1 deletions were confirmed as such by breakpoint-spanning PCR or SNP analysis. Both deletions were associated with a generalized manifestation of NF1. Independently, we identified a third patient with a mosaic type-1 NF1 deletion who exhibited segmental NF1. Together, these three cases constitute the first proven mosaic type-1 deletions so far reported. In two of these three mosaic type-1 deletions, the breakpoints were located within PRS1 and PRS2, previously identified as hotspots for nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) during meiosis. Hence, NAHR within PRS1 and PRS2 is not confined to meiosis but may also occur during postzygotic mitotic cell cycles.     

Genotype analysis of the NF1 gene in the French Canadians from the Québec population

We genotyped 19 NF1 families from the French Canadians of the Québec population with six intragenic polymorphic markers including 2 RFLPs (EcoRI and RsaI) and 4 microsatellites (IVS26‐2.3, IVS27AC28.4, IVS27AC33.1, and IVS38GT53.0). Genotype analysis indicated families 7610 and 7473 bear deletions. In Family 7610 the deletion removed the entire NF1 gene except exons 1 to 4b. The breakpoint of the deletion is located between exons 4a and 4b. The deletion 7473 was derived from the maternal chromosome and exons 1 to 5 were deleted. The breakpoint of the deletion is located between exons 7 and 13. Their phenotypes are reported. The allele frequencies of microsatellites IVS27AC28.4 and IVS38GT53.0 are compared to previously reported data from Caucasians, including Spanish and Italians. The difference is statistically significant (P < 0.0036) for marker IVS27AC28.4 between the Québec French Canadian and the Italian population. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): Identification of eight unreported mutations in NF1 gene in Italian patients [corrected

In the present study the entire NF1 coding region was analyzed for mutations in 132 unrelated Italian NF1 patients. Using PTT, SSCP, and DNA sequencing, we found 8 novel mutations. Clinical diagnosis of NF1 was established according to the NIH consensus criteria. We detected 59 truncated fragments, and 46 of them were characterized by SSCP and direct sequencing. Eight mutations represent novel changes that contribute to the germline mutational spectrum of the NF1 gene. In two patients, premature termination was due to substitutions at nucleotide c.3982C>T (Q1298X) and c.7411C>T (Q2471X), respectively. Two other mutations were caused by the deletions (1756delA, 4699delA), and two by the insertions (c.5266_5267insT, c.7464_7465insTCCA) of a small number of nucleotides. Lastly, we found 2 splice-site mutations (c.2252-2A>C, c.2251+1G>A).     

Recurrent NF1 gene mutation in a patient with oligosymptomatic neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1)

We report a 21-year-old male with symptomatic optic glioma who does not fulfill the diagnosis of neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) according to standard NIH criteria. Analysis of the NF1 gene revealed a recurrent mutation in exon 37 (C6792A or Y2264X). This nonsense mutation causes skipping of exon 37 during the splicing process and is predicted to result in a protein shortened by 34 amino acid residues. The mutation was detected in all tissues examined (blood lymphocytes, oral mucosa, and dermal fibroblasts). The same mutation was previously found in 3 patients with clinically confirmed NF1. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an adult patient carrying a putative (non-mosaic) NF1 gene mutation in multiple tissues but not fulfilling the NIH criteria for the clinical diagnosis of NF1. Am. J. Med. Genet. 86:328–330, 1999.     

NF1 gene analysis based on DHPLC

The high mutation rate at the NF1 locus results in a wide range of molecular abnormalities. The majority of these mutations are private and rare, generating elevated allelic diversity with a restricted number of recurrent mutations. In this study, we have assessed the efficacy of denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), for detecting mutation in the NF1 gene. DHPLC is a fast and highly sensitive technique based on the detection of heteroduplexes in PCR products by ion pair reverse-phase HPLC under partially denaturing conditions. We established theoretical conditions for DHPLC analysis of all coding exons and splice junctions of the NF1 gene using the WAVEmaker software version 4.1.40 and screened for mutations a panel of 40 unrelated NF1 patients (25 sporadic and 15 familial), genetically uncharacterized. Disruptive mutations were identified in 29 individuals with an overall mutation detection rate of 72.5%. The mutations included eight deletions (exons 4b, 7, 10a, 14, 26, and 31), one insertion (exon 8), nine nonsense mutation (exons 10a, 13, 23.1, 27a, 29, 31, and 36), six missense mutations (exons 15, 16, 17, 24, and 31), four splice errors (exons 11, 14, 36, and 40) and a complex rearrangement within exon 16. Eighteen (62%) of the identified disruptive mutations are novel. Seven unclassified and three previously reported polymorphisms were also detected. None of the missense mutations identified in this study were found after screening of 150 controls. Our results suggest that DHPLC provides an accurate method for the rapid identification of NF1 mutations.     

Characterization of the nonallelic homologous recombination hotspot PRS3 associated with type-3 NF1 deletions

Nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) is the major mechanism underlying recurrent genomic rearrangements, including the large deletions at 17q11.2 that cause neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). Here, we identify a novel NAHR hotspot, responsible for type-3 NF1 deletions that span 1.0 Mb. Breakpoint clustering within this 1-kb hotspot, termed PRS3, was noted in 10 of 11 known type-3 NF1 deletions. PRS3 is located within the LRRC37B pseudogene of the NF1-REPb and NF1-REPc low-copy repeats. In contrast to other previously characterized NAHR hotspots, PRS3 has not developed on a preexisting allelic homologous recombination hotspot. Furthermore, the variation pattern of PRS3 and its flanking regions is unusual since only NF1-REPc (and not NF1-REPb) is characterized by a high single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) frequency, suggestive of unidirectional sequence transfer via nonallelic homologous gene conversion (NAHGC). By contrast, the previously described intense NAHR hotspots within the CMT1A-REPs, and the PRS1 and PRS2 hotspots underlying type-1 NF1 deletions, experience frequent bidirectional sequence transfer. PRS3 within NF1-REPc was also found to be involved in NAHGC with the LRRC37B gene, the progenitor locus of the LRRC37B-P duplicons, as indicated by the presence of shared SNPs between these loci. PRS3 therefore represents a weak (and probably evolutionarily rather young) NAHR hotspot with unique properties.     

Growth in neurofibromatosis 1 microdeletion patients

Microdeletions of the entire NF1 gene and surrounding genomic region occur in about 5% of patients with neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1). NF1 microdeletion patients usually have more cutaneous and plexiform neurofibromas and a higher risk of developing malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors than other people with NF1. Somatic overgrowth has also been observed in NF1 microdeletion patients, an observation that is remarkable because most NF1 patients are smaller than average for age and sex. We studied longitudinal measurements of height, weight, and head circumference in 56 patients with NF1 microdeletions and 226 NF1 patients with other kinds of mutations. Although children with NF1 microdeletions were much taller than non‐deletion NF1 patients at all ages after 2 years, the lengths of deletion and nondeletion NF1 patients were similar in early infancy. NF1 microdeletion patients tended to be heavier than other NF1 patients, but height or weight more than 3 standard deviations above the mean for age and sex was infrequent in children with NF1 microdeletions. Head circumference and age of puberty were similar in deletion and non‐deletion NF1 patients. The pattern of growth differs substantially in deletion and non‐deletion NF1 patients, but the pathogenic basis for this difference is unknown.     

Analysis of Crossover Breakpoints Yields New Insights into the Nature of the Gene Conversion Events Associated with Large NF1 Deletions Mediated by Nonallelic Homologous Recombination

Large NF1 deletions are mediated by nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR). An in‐depth analysis of gene conversion operating in the breakpoint‐flanking regions of large NF1 deletions was performed to investigate whether the rate of discontinuous gene conversion during NAHR with crossover is increased, as has been previously noted in NAHR‐mediated rearrangements. All 20 germline type‐1 NF1 deletions analyzed were mediated by NAHR associated with continuous gene conversion within the breakpoint‐flanking regions. Continuous gene conversion was also observed in 31/32 type‐2 NF1 deletions investigated. In contrast to the meiotic type‐1 NF1 deletions, type‐2 NF1 deletions are predominantly of post‐zygotic origin. Our findings therefore imply that the mitotic as well as the meiotic NAHR intermediates of large NF1 deletions are processed by long‐patch mismatch repair (MMR), thereby ensuring gene conversion tract continuity instead of the discontinuous gene conversion that is characteristic of short‐patch repair. However, the single type‐2 NF1 deletion not exhibiting continuous gene conversion was processed without MMR, yielding two different deletion‐bearing chromosomes, which were distinguishable in terms of their breakpoint positions. Our findings indicate that MMR failure during NAHR, followed by post‐meiotic/mitotic segregation, has the potential to give rise to somatic mosaicism in human genomic rearrangements by generating breakpoint heterogeneity.     

Connective tissue dysplasia in five new patients with NF1 microdeletions: further expansion of phenotype and review of the literature

Approximately 5% of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) have deletions of the entire NF1 gene. The phenotype usually includes early onset, large number of neurofibromas, presence of congenital anomalies, cognitive deficiency, and variable dysmorphic features and growth abnormalities. Connective tissue abnormalities are not generally recognised as a part of NF1 microdeletion syndrome, but mitral valve prolapse, joint laxity, and/or soft skin on the palms have been reported in a few patients. We describe clinical findings in six newly diagnosed patients with NF1 microdeletions, five of whom presented with connective tissue abnormalities. A literature review of the clinical findings associated with NF1 microdeletion was also performed. Our report confirms that connective tissue dysplasia is common in patients with NF1 microdeletions. Given the potential for associated cardiac manifestation, screening by echocardiogram may be warranted. Despite the large number (>150) of patients with known NF1 microdeletions, the clinical phenotype remains incompletely defined. Additional reports of patients with NF1 microdeletions, including comprehensive clinical and molecular information, are needed to elucidate possible genotype–phenotype correlation.     

Intrachromosomal mitotic nonallelic homologous recombination is the major molecular mechanism underlying type‐2 NF1 deletions

Nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) is responsible for the recurrent rearrangements that give rise to genomic disorders. Although meiotic NAHR has been investigated in multiple contexts, much less is known about mitotic NAHR despite its importance for tumorigenesis. Because type‐2 NF1 microdeletions frequently result from mitotic NAHR, they represent a good model in which to investigate the features of mitotic NAHR. We have used microsatellite analysis and SNP arrays to distinguish between the various alternative recombinational possibilities, thereby ascertaining that 17 of 18 type‐2 NF1 deletions, with breakpoints in the SUZ12 gene and its highly homologous pseudogene, originated via intrachromosomal recombination. This high proportion of intrachromosomal NAHR causing somatic type‐2 NF1 deletions contrasts with the interchromosomal origin of germline type‐1 NF1 microdeletions, whose breakpoints are located within the NF1‐REPs (low‐copy repeats located adjacent to the SUZ12 sequences). Further, meiotic NAHR causing type‐1 NF1 deletions occurs within recombination hotspots characterized by high GC‐content and DNA duplex stability, whereas the type‐2 breakpoints associated with the mitotic NAHR events investigated here do not cluster within hotspots and are located within regions of significantly lower GC‐content and DNA stability. Our findings therefore point to fundamental mechanistic differences between the determinants of mitotic and meiotic NAHR. Hum Mutat 31:1163–1173, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Old and new perspectives on Neurofibromatosis type 1: Clinical and molecular characterization of 832 patients from a single centre over 16 years

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1; OMIM #162200) is the commonest multi-systemic neurocutaneous tumour-predisposition disorder. It has an age-related complete penetrance but a highly variable inter- and intra-familial expressivity. This article summarizes the clinical features and molecular characteristics of 832 clinically or molecularly confirmed NF1 patients from 697 unrelated families recruited from a single centre in Hong Kong diagnosed during the 16 years period from Jan 2005 to Jan 2021. In this study, we have estimated the incidences of clinical features, reported on the molecular findings and explored new genotype-phenotype correlations.     

Comprehensive NF1 screening on cultured Schwann cells from neurofibromas

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is mainly characterized by the occurrence of benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors or neurofibromas. Thorough investigation of the somatic mutation spectrum has thus far been hampered by the large size of the NF1 gene and the considerable proportion of NF1 heterozygous cells within the tumors. We developed an improved somatic mutation detection strategy on cultured Schwann cells derived from neurofibromas and investigated 38 tumors from nine NF1 patients. Twenty-nine somatic NF1 lesions were detected which represents the highest NF1 somatic mutation detection rate described so far (76%). Furthermore, our data strongly suggest that the acquired second hit underlies reduced NF1 expression in Schwann cell cultures. Together, these data clearly illustrate that two inactivating NF1 mutations, in a subpopulation of the Schwann cells, are required for neurofibroma formation in NF1 tumorigenesis. The observed somatic mutation spectrum shows that intragenic NF1 mutations (26/29) are most prevalent, particularly frameshift mutations (12/29, 41%). We hypothesize that this mutation signature might reflect slightly reduced DNA repair efficiency as a trigger for NF1 somatic inactivation preceding tumorigenesis. Joint analysis of the current and previously published NF1 mutation data revealed a significant difference in the somatic mutation spectrum in patients with a NF1 microdeletion vs. non-microdeletion patients with respect to the prevalence of loss of heterozygosity events (0/15 vs. 41/81). Differences in somatic inactivation mechanism might therefore exist between NF1 microdeletion patients and the general NF1 population.     

Analysis of NF1 gene mutations in two sporadic patients with neurofibromatosis type 1CSCD

Objective: To detect mutations of the NF1 gene in two sporadic cases with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and explore their molecular mechanisms. Methods: Clinical data of the two patients was collected. Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples. Specific primers were designed to exclude pseudogenes. PCR was performed to amplify all coding exons of the NF1 gene. PCR products were directly sequenced. Results: Two novel mutations of the NF1 gene (c. 1019-1020delCT in exon 9 and c. 7189G> A in exon 48) were respectively identified in the two patients but not among their unaffected parents or 100 healthy controls. Conclusion: Mutations of the NF1 gene may have predisposed to the NF1 in the two patients. © 2018 MeDitorial Ltd. All rights reserved.     

Somatic NF1 mutation spectra in a family with neurofibromatosis type 1: toward a theory of genetic modifiers

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), an autosomal dominantly-inherited disorder, is mainly characterized by the occurrence of multiple dermal neurofibromas and is caused by mutations in the NF1 gene, a tumor suppressor gene. The variable expressivity of the disease and the lack of a genotype/phenotype correlation prevents any prediction of patient outcome and points to the action of genetic factors in addition to stochastic factors modifying the severity of the disease. The analysis of somatic NF1 gene mutations in neurofibromas from NF1 patients revealed that each neurofibroma results from an individual second hit mutation, indicating that factors that influence somatic mutation rates may be regarded as potential modifiers of NF1. A mutational screen of numerous neurofibromas from two NF1 patients presented here revealed a predominance of point mutations, small deletions, and insertions as second hit mutations in both patients. Seven novel mutations are reported. Together with the results of studies that showed LOH as the predominant second hit in neurofibromas of other patients, our results suggest that in different patients different factors may influence the somatic mutation rate and thereby the severity of the disease.     

Characterization of the somatic mutational spectrum of the neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene in neurofibromatosis patients with benign and malignant tumors

One of the main features of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is benign neurofibromas, 10-20% of which become transformed into malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNSTs). The molecular basis of NF1 tumorigenesis is, however, still unclear. Ninety-one tumors from 31 NF1 patients were screened for gross changes in the NF1 gene using microsatellite/restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers; loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was found in 17 out of 91 (19%) tumors (including two out of seven MPNSTs). Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) was then used to screen 43 LOH-negative and 10 LOH-positive tumors for NF1 microlesions at both RNA and DNA levels. Thirteen germline and 12 somatic mutations were identified, of which three germline (IVS7-2A>G, 3731delT, 6117delG) and eight somatic (1888delG, 4374-4375delCC, R2129S, 2088delG, 2341del18, IVS27b-5C>T, 4083insT, Q519P) were novel. A mosaic mutation (R2429X) was also identified in a neurofibroma by DHPLC analysis and cloning/sequencing. The observed somatic and germline mutational spectra were similar in terms of mutation type, relative frequency of occurrence, and putative underlying mechanisms of mutagenesis. Tumors lacking mutations were screened for NF1 gene promoter hypermethylation but none were found. Microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis revealed MSI in five out of 11 MPNSTs as compared to none out of 70 neurofibromas (p=1.8 x 10(-5)). The screening of seven MPNSTs for subtle mutations in the CDKN2A and TP53 genes proved negative, although the screening of 11 MPNSTs detected LOH involving either the TP53 or the CDKN2A gene in a total of four tumors. These findings are consistent with the view that NF1 tumorigenesis is a complex multistep process involving a variety of different types of genetic defect at multiple loci.     

Exploring the somatic NF1 mutational spectrum associated with NF1 cutaneous neurofibromas

Neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF1), caused by heterozygous inactivation of the NF1 tumour suppressor gene, is associated with the development of benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (MPNSTs). Although numerous germline NF1 mutations have been identified, relatively few somatic NF1 mutations have been described in neurofibromas. Here we have screened 109 cutaneous neurofibromas, excised from 46 unrelated NF1 patients, for somatic NF1 mutations. NF1 mutation screening (involving loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) analysis, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and DNA sequencing) identified 77 somatic NF1 point mutations, of which 53 were novel. LOH spanning the NF1 gene region was evident in 25 neurofibromas, but in contrast to previous data from MPNSTs, it was absent at the TP53, CDKN2A and RB1 gene loci. Analysis of DNA/RNA from neurofibroma-derived Schwann cell cultures revealed NF1 mutations in four tumours whose presence had been overlooked in the tumour DNA. Bioinformatics analysis suggested that four of seven novel somatic NF1 missense mutations (p.A330T, p.Q519P, p.A776T, p.S1463F) could be of functional/clinical significance. Functional analysis confirmed this prediction for p.S1463F, located within the GTPase-activating protein-related domain, as this mutation resulted in a 150-fold increase in activated GTP-bound Ras. Comparison of the relative frequencies of the different types of somatic NF1 mutation observed with those of their previously reported germline counterparts revealed significant (P=0.001) differences. Although non-identical somatic mutations involving either the same or adjacent nucleotides were identified in three pairs of tumours from the same patients (P<0.0002), no association was noted between the type of germline and somatic NF1 lesion within the same individual.     

Identification of Large NF1 Duplications Reciprocal to NAHR‐Mediated Type‐1 NF1 Deletions

Approximately 5% of all patients with neurofibromatosis type‐1 (NF1) exhibit large deletions of the NF1 gene region. To date, only nine unrelated cases of large NF1 duplications have been reported, with none of the affected patients exhibiting multiple café au lait spots (CALS), Lisch nodules, freckling, or neurofibromas, the hallmark signs of NF1. Here, we have characterized two novel NF1 duplications, one sporadic and one familial. Both index patients with NF1 duplications exhibited learning disabilities and atypical CALS. Additionally, patient R609021 had Lisch nodules, whereas patient R653070 exhibited two inguinal freckles. The mother and sister of patient R609021 also harbored the NF1 duplication and exhibited cognitive dysfunction but no CALS. The breakpoints of the nine NF1 duplications reported previously have not been identified and hence their underlying generative mechanisms have remained unclear. In this study, we performed high‐resolution breakpoint analysis that indicated that the two duplications studied were mediated by nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) and that the duplication breakpoints were located within the NAHR hotspot paralogous recombination site 2 (PRS2), which also harbors the type‐1 NF1 deletion breakpoints. Hence, our study indicates for the first time that NF1 duplications are reciprocal to type‐1 NF1 deletions and originate from the same NAHR events.