18F-FLT PET for visualization of laryngeal cancer: comparison with 18F-FDG PET.

The feasibility of (18)F-3'-fluoro-3'-deoxy-L-thymidine PET (FLT PET) for detecting laryngeal cancer was investigated and compared with (18)F-FDG PET. METHODS: Eleven patients diagnosed with or strongly suspected of having recurrent laryngeal cancer and 10 patients with histologically proven primary laryngeal cancer underwent attenuation-corrected (18)F-FLT PET imaging 60 min after injection of a median of 213 MBq (range, 175-400 MBq) (18)F-FLT and attenuation-corrected (18)F-FDG PET imaging 90 min after injection of a median of 340 MBq (range, 165-650 MBq) (18)F-FDG. All patients were staged by endoscopy and CT according to the Union Internationale Contre la Cancer TNM staging system. All patients underwent biopsy of the laryngeal area after imaging. Lesions seen on (18)F-FDG PET and (18)F-FLT PET were compared with histopathologic results. Mean SUVs, maximum SUVs, and tumor-to-nontumor (TNT) ratios were calculated for (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG. Wilcoxon nonparametric testing was used for comparison of (18)F-FDG with (18)F-FLT uptake. The Spearman correlation coefficient was used to correlate mean SUVs, maximum SUVs, and TNT ratios of (18)F-FDG PET and (18)F-FLT PET. Two-tailed P values < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: (18)F-FDG PET and (18)F-FLT PET detected laryngeal cancer correctly in 15 of 17 patients. One lesion judged as positive on (18)F-FDG PET turned out to be normal tissue. Of 2 lesions judged as positive on (18)F-FLT PET, 1 turned out to be inflammation and the other to be normal tissue. Maximum SUVs were 3.3 (range, 1.9-8.5) for (18)F-FDG and 1.6 (range, 1.0-5.7) for (18)F-FLT (P < 0.001). Mean SUVs were 2.7 (range, 1.5-6.5) for (18)F-FDG and 1.2 (range, 0.8-3.8) for (18)F-FLT (P < 0.001). TNT was 1.9 (range, 1.3-4.7) for (18)F-FDG and 1.5 (range, 1.1-3.5) for (18)F-FLT (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The numbers of laryngeal cancers detected with (18)F-FLT PET and (18)F-FDG PET were equal. In laryngeal cancer, the uptake of (18)F-FDG is higher than that of (18)F-FLT.     

The usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/MRI fusion image in diagnosing pancreatic tumor: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT

Purpose

This study aimed at demonstrating the feasibility of retrospectively fused ¹⁸F FDG-PET and MRI (PET/MRI fusion image) in diagnosing pancreatic tumor, in particular differentiating malignant tumor from benign lesions. In addition, we evaluated additional findings characterizing pancreatic lesions by FDG-PET/MRI fusion image.

Methods

We analyzed retrospectively 119 patients: 96 cancers and 23 benign lesions. FDG-PET/MRI fusion images (PET/T1 WI or PET/T2WI) were made by dedicated software using 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI image and FDG-PET images. These images were interpreted by two well-trained radiologists without knowledge of clinical information and compared with FDG-PET/CT images. We compared the differential diagnostic capability between PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI fusion image. In addition, we evaluated additional findings such as tumor structure and tumor invasion.

Results

FDG-PET/MRI fusion image significantly improved accuracy compared with that of PET/CT (96.6 vs. 86.6 %). As additional finding, dilatation of main pancreatic duct was noted in 65.9 % of solid types and in 22.6 % of cystic types, on PET/MRI-T2 fusion image. Similarly, encasement of adjacent vessels was noted in 43.1 % of solid types and in 6.5 % of cystic types. Particularly in cystic types, intra-tumor structures such as mural nodule (35.4 %) or intra-cystic septum (74.2 %) were detected additionally. Besides, PET/MRI-T2 fusion image could detect extra benign cystic lesions (9.1 % in solid type and 9.7 % in cystic type) that were not noted by PET/CT.

Conclusions

In diagnosing pancreatic lesions, FDG-PET/MRI fusion image was useful in differentiating pancreatic cancer from benign lesions. Furthermore, it was helpful in evaluating relationship between lesions and surrounding tissues as well as in detecting extra benign cysts.     

Imaging proliferation in brain tumors with 18F-FLT PET: comparison with 18F-FDG.

3'-Deoxy-3'-(18)F-fluorothymidine ((18)F-FLT) is a recently developed PET tracer to image tumor cell proliferation. We characterized (18)F-FLT PET of brain gliomas and compared (18)F-FLT with (18)F-FDG PET in side-by-side studies of the same patients. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with newly diagnosed or previously treated glioma underwent PET with (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG on consecutive days. Three stable patients in long-term remission were included as negative control subjects. Tracer kinetics in normal brain and tumor were measured. Uptake of (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG was quantified by the standardized uptake value (SUV) and the tumor-to-normal tissue (T/N) ratio. The accuracy of (18)F-FLT and (18)F-FDG PET in evaluating newly diagnosed and recurrent gliomas was compared. More than half of the patients underwent resection after the PET study and correlations between PET uptake and the Ki-67 proliferation index were examined. Patients were monitored for a mean of 15.4 mo (range, 12-20 mo). The predictive power of PET for tumor progression and survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier statistics. RESULTS: (18)F-FLT uptake in tumors was rapid, peaking at 5-10 min after injection and remaining stable up to 75 min. Hence, a 30-min scan beginning at 5 min after injection was sufficient for imaging. (18)F-FLT visualized all high-grade (grade III or IV) tumors. Grade II tumor did not show appreciable (18)F-FLT uptake and neither did the stable lesions. The absolute uptake of (18)F-FLT was low (maximum-pixel SUV [SUV(max)], 1.33) but image contrast was better than with (18)F-FDG (T/N ratio, 3.85 vs. 1.49). (18)F-FDG PET studies were negative in 5 patients with recurrent high-grade glioma who subsequently suffered tumor progression within 1-3 mo. (18)F-FLT SUV(max) correlated more strongly with Ki-67 index (r = 0.84; P < 0.0001) than (18)F-FDG SUV(max) (r = 0.51; P = 0.07). (18)F-FLT uptake also had more significant predictive power with respect to tumor progression and survival (P = 0.0005 and P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Thirty-minute (18)F-FLT PET 5 min after injection was more sensitive than (18)F-FDG to image recurrent high-grade tumors, correlated better with Ki-67 values, and was a more powerful predictor of tumor progression and survival. Thus, (18)F-FLT appears to be a promising tracer as a surrogate marker of proliferation in high-grade gliomas.     

18F-FDOPA PET/CT for detection of recurrence in patients with glioma: prospective comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT

Purpose

Differentiation between recurrence and radiation necrosis in patients with glioma is crucial, since the two entities have completely different management and prognosis. The purpose of the present study was to compare the efficacies of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and 3,4-dihydroxy-6-[¹⁸F]fluoro-phenylalanine (¹⁸F-FDOPA) PET/CT in detection of recurrent gliomas.

Methods

A total of 28 patients (age 38.82?±?1.25 years; 85.7 % men) with histopathologically proven glioma with clinical/imaging suspicion of recurrence were evaluated using ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET/CT. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET/CT images were evaluated qualitatively and semiquantitatively. The combination of clinical follow-up, repeat imaging and/or biopsy (when available) was taken as the reference standard.

Results

Based on the reference standard, 21 patients were positive and 7 were negative for tumour recurrence. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were 47.6 %, 100 % and 60.7 %, respectively, and those of ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET/CT were 100 %, 85.7 % and 96.4 %, respectively. The results of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET/CT were concordant in 57.1 % of patients (16 of 28) and discordant in 42.9 % (12 of 28). The difference in the findings between ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDOPA PET/CT was significant (P?=?0.0005, McNemar’s test). The difference was significant for low-grade tumours (P?=?0.0039) but not for high-grade tumours (P?=?0.250).

Conclusion

¹⁸F-FDOPA PET/CT is highly sensitive and specific for detection of recurrence in glioma patients. It is superior to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for this purpose and is especially advantageous in patients with low-grade gliomas.     

Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma using 11C-choline PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively investigate the feasibility of 11C-choline PET, compared with 18F-FDG PET, for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: A total of 16 HCC lesions in 12 patients were examined with both 11C-choline PET and 18F-FDG PET. Tumor lesions were identified as areas of focally increased uptake, exceeding that of surrounding noncancerous liver tissue. For semiquantitative analysis, the tumor-to-liver (T/L) ratio was calculated by dividing the maximal standardized uptake value (SUV) in HCC lesions by the mean SUV in noncancerous liver tissue. RESULTS: 11C-choline PET showed a slightly higher detection rate than did 18F-FDG PET for detection of HCC (63% vs. 50%, respectively), although this difference was not statistically significant. 11C-choline PET had a better detection rate for moderately differentiated HCC lesions but not for those poorly differentiated (75% vs. 25%, respectively). In contrast, 18F-FDG PET exhibited the opposite behavior, with corresponding detection rates of 42% and 75%, respectively. The mean 11C-choline SUV and T/L ratio in moderately differentiated HCC lesions were higher than those in poorly differentiated HCC lesions. In contrast, the mean 18F-FDG SUV and T/L ratio in poorly differentiated HCC were higher than those in moderately differentiated HCC. These differences, however, were also not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: 11C-choline PET had a better detection rate for moderately differentiated HCC lesions but not for poorly differentiated HCC lesions, whereas 18F-FDG PET produced the opposite result. 11C-choline is a potential tracer to complement 18F-FDG in detection of HCC lesions.     

Direct comparison of (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT in patients with colorectal carcinoma.

The purpose of this study was to compare (18)F-FDG PET and PET/CT in a population of patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: PET and PET/CT images from 45 patients (17 women, 28 men; mean age +/- SD, 60.8 +/- 11.1 y) with known colorectal cancer referred for PET from June to November 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. Images were acquired with a PET/CT scanner, and (68)Ge attenuation correction was applied. PET images and fused (68)Ge attenuation-corrected PET and CT images were independently and separately interpreted by a moderately experienced reader unaware of the clinical information. Certainty of lesion characterization was scored on a 5-point scale (0 = definitely benign, 1 = probably benign, 2 = equivocal, 3 = probably malignant, 4 = definitely malignant). Lesion location was scored on a 3-point scale (0 = uncertain, 1 = probable, 2 = definite). The presence or absence of tumor was subsequently assessed using all available clinical, pathologic, and follow-up information. Analysis was provided for lesions detected by both PET and PET/CT. RESULTS: The frequency of equivocal and probable lesion characterization was reduced by 50% (50 to 25) with PET/CT, in comparison with PET. The frequency of definite lesion characterization was increased by 30% (84 to 109) with PET/CT. The number of definite locations was increased by 25% (92 to 115) with PET/CT. Overall correct staging increased from 78% to 89% with PET/CT on a patient-by-patient analysis. CONCLUSION: PET/CT imaging increases the accuracy and certainty of locating lesions in colorectal cancer. More definitely normal and definitely abnormal lesions (and fewer probable and equivocal lesions) were identified with PET/CT than with PET alone. Staging and restaging accuracy improved from 78% to 89%.     

18F-FDOPA与18F-FDG PET/CT诊断脑肿瘤的系统评价

目的 系统评价18F-FDOPA与18F-FDG PET/CT显像在脑肿瘤诊断中的临床价值.方法 采用Meta分析与直接比较方法.使用计算机检索中国期刊全文数据库、中文科技期刊数据库、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Embase、The Cochrane Library,从建库至2016年10月,搜索直接比较18F-FDOPA与18F-FDG PET/CT诊断脑肿瘤的诊断性试验.用Meta-Disc 1.4软件进行分析,计算两种不同显像剂的合并敏感度(sensitivity,SEN)、合并特异度(specificity,SPE)、合并阳性似然比(positive likelihood ratio,+LR)、合并阴性似然比(negative likelihood ratio,-LR)、诊断优势比(diagnostic odds ratio,DOR),并绘制综合受试者工作特征曲线计算曲线下面积(area under curve,AUC)与Q*值.结果 最终共纳入4篇文章,Meta 分析结果显示,18F-FDOPA PET/CT对脑肿瘤诊断的合并SEN为0.97(95％ CI =0.90 ～ 1.00),SPE为0.67(95％ CI =0.45 ～0.84),+LR为2.31 (95％ CI=1.40 ～3.81),-LR为0.07 (95％ CI =0.02～ 0.24),DOR为39.72(95％ CI=8.94～176.48),AUC为0.9725,Q*为0.9239.18F-FDG PET/CT对脑肿瘤诊断的合并SEN为0.51(95％CI=0.39～0.63),SPE为0.75(95％ CI=0.53 ～0.90,+LR为l.59(95％ CI=0.70 ～ 3.61),-LR为0.63(95％ CI =0.47 ～0.86),DOR为2.55(95％ CI =0.82 ～7.92),AUC为0.5848,Q*为0.5638.结论 18F-FDOPA PET/CT显像诊断脑肿瘤的敏感性比18F-FDG高,对脑肿瘤具有良好的诊断价值,可作为脑肿瘤诊断的方法之一.     

18F-FDOPA PET imaging of brain tumors: comparison study with 18F-FDG PET and evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.

We evaluated the amino acid and glucose metabolism of brain tumors by using PET with 3,4-dihydroxy-6-(18)F-fluoro-l-phenylalanine ((18)F-FDOPA) and (18)F-FDG. METHODS: Eighty-one patients undergoing evaluation for brain tumors were studied. Initially, 30 patients underwent PET with (18)F-FDOPA and (18)F-FDG within the same week. Tracer kinetics in normal brain and tumor tissues were estimated. PET uptake was quantified by use of standardized uptake values and the ratio of tumor uptake to normal hemispheric tissue uptake (T/N). In addition, PET uptake with (18)F-FDOPA was quantified by use of ratios of tumor uptake to striatum uptake (T/S) and of tumor uptake to white matter uptake. The accuracies of (18)F-FDOPA and (18)F-FDG PET were determined by comparing imaging data with histologic findings and findings of clinical follow-up of up to 31 mo (mean, 20 mo). To further validate the accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET, (18)F-FDOPA PET was performed with an additional 51 patients undergoing brain tumor evaluation. RESULTS: Tracer uptake in tumors on (18)F-FDOPA scans was rapid, peaking at approximately 15 min after intravenous injection. Tumor uptake could be distinguished from that of the striatum by the difference in peak times. Both high-grade and low-grade tumors were well visualized with (18)F-FDOPA. The sensitivity for identifying tumors was substantially higher with (18)F-FDOPA PET than with (18)F-FDG PET at comparable specificities, as determined by simple visual inspection, especially for the assessment of low-grade tumors. Using receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis, we found the optimal threshold for (18)F-FDOPA to be a T/S of greater than 1.0 (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 100%) or a T/N of greater than 1.3 (sensitivity, 96%; specificity, 86%). The high diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDOPA PET at these thresholds was confirmed with the additional 51 patients (a total of 81 patients: sensitivity, 98%; specificity, 86%; positive predictive value, 95%; negative predictive value, 95%). No significant difference in tumor uptake on (18)F-FDOPA scans was seen between low-grade and high-grade tumors (P = 0.40) or between contrast-enhancing and nonenhancing tumors (P = 0.97). Radiation necrosis was generally distinguishable from tumors on (18)F-FDOPA scans (P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDOPA PET was more accurate than (18)F-FDG PET for imaging of low-grade tumors and evaluating recurrent tumors. (18)F-FDOPA PET may prove especially useful for imaging of recurrent low-grade tumors and for distinguishing tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis.     

Initial clinical results of simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI in comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic capability of simultaneous ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI compared to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT as well as their single components in head and neck cancer patients.

Methods

In a prospective study 17 patients underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for staging or follow-up and an additional ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MRI scan with whole-body imaging and dedicated examination of the neck. MRI, CT and PET images as well as PET/MRI and PET/CT examinations were evaluated independently and in a blinded fashion by two reader groups. Results were compared with the reference standard (final diagnosis determined in consensus using all available data including histology and follow-up). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

Results

A total of 23 malignant tumours were found with the reference standard. PET/CT showed a sensitivity of 82.7 %, a specificity of 87.3 %, a PPV of 73.2 % and a NPV of 92.4 %. Corresponding values for PET/MRI were 80.5, 88.2, 75.6 and 92.5 %. No statistically significant difference in diagnostic capability could be found between PET/CT and PET/MRI. Evaluation of the PET part from PET/CT revealed highest sensitivity of 95.7 %, and MRI showed best specificity of 96.4 %. There was a high inter-rater agreement in all modalities (Cohen’s kappa 0.61–0.82).

Conclusion

PET/MRI of patients with head and neck cancer yielded good diagnostic capability, similar to PET/CT. Further studies on larger cohorts to prove these first results seem justified.     

18F-FET与18F-FDG PET显像对照研究

目的探讨O（2-[^18F]氟代乙基）-L-酪氨酸（^18F—FET）对肿瘤的探测能力。方法2例脑瘤患者，用于了解^18F—FETPET显像的全身分布情况。经病理检查或手术证实的其他部位肿瘤患者12例（肺癌6例，胰腺癌、神经内分泌肿瘤各2例，肾上腺皮质癌、鼻咽癌各1例），均有近期CT检查，少数行MRI或全身骨显像检查，1周内分别行^18F—FET与^18F-脱氧萄萄糖（FDG）PET显像。结果①^18F—FET主要经泌尿及胆道系统排泄，骨骼、软组织及心、肝等仅轻度摄取，标准摄取值（SUV）0．38—1．64，肠道、胰腺基本不显影。②12例肿瘤患者^18F—FDGPET显像共检出110个病灶，^18F—FET仅检出15个，病灶的SUV也明显低于^18F—FDG。^18F—FET不仅对一些^18F—FDG代谢活性高的孤立病灶显示不清，对小病灶的检出率也明显低于^18F—FDG。结论^18F—FETPET显像对肺癌、胰腺癌、肾上腺皮质癌等的探测能力明显低于^18F—FDG。     

Solid splenic masses: evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Our objective was to assess the role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of solid splenic masses in patients with a known malignancy and in incidentally found lesions in patients without known malignancy. METHODS: Two groups of patients were assessed: (a) 68 patients with known malignancy and a focal lesion on PET or a solid mass on CT portions of the PET/CT study; and (b) 20 patients with solid splenic masses on conventional imaging without known malignancy. The standard of reference was histology (n = 16) or imaging and clinical follow-up (n = 72). The lesion size, the presence of a single versus multiple splenic lesions, and the intensity of (18)F-FDG uptake expressed as a standardized uptake value (SUV) were recorded. The ratio of the SUV in the splenic lesion to the background normal splenic uptake was also calculated. These parameters were compared between benign and malignant lesions within each of the 2 groups of patients and between the 2 groups. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in differentiating benign from malignant solid splenic lesions in patients with and without malignant disease were 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% versus 100%, 83%, 80%, and 100%, respectively. In patients with known malignant disease, an SUV threshold of 2.3 correctly differentiated benign from malignant lesions with the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. In patients without known malignant disease, false-positive results were due to granulomatous diseases (n = 2). CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET can reliably discriminate between benign and malignant solid splenic masses in patients with known (18)F-FDG-avid malignancy. It also appears to have a high NPV in patients with solid splenic masses, without known malignant disease. (18)F-FDG-avid splenic masses in patients without a known malignancy should be further evaluated as, in our series, 80% of them were malignant.     

Increased 18F-FDG uptake in degenerative disease of the spine: Characterization with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

We determined the prevalence of abnormal spinal 18F-FDG uptake and assessed the relationship between the severity of findings on 18F-FDG PET and the severity of degenerative spinal disease (DSD) on CT. METHODS: PET/CT scans of 150 patients >18 y old, referred for whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT for evaluation of known or suspected malignancy from June to July 2002, were analyzed retrospectively for the presence of increased 18F-FDG uptake in the spine and for anatomic correlates. Initially, PET images were examined and foci of 18F-FDG uptake in the spine were graded on a 0-4 scale based on intensity of 18F-FDG uptake (0 = definitely normal, 1 = probably normal, 2 = equivocal, 3 = probably abnormal, 4 = definitely abnormal). From PET alone, an impression as to whether lesions were most likely metastases or degenerative, as well the level of the spine involved, was also recorded. CT images of all 150 patients were reviewed independently by a musculoskeletal radiologist, who was unaware of patient identification, history, and findings of other imaging modalities, with the location recorded and severity graded on a 4-point-scale (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe for both degenerative disk and facet disease). The relationship between PET and CT findings was then determined. RESULTS: Of the 150 patients, 63 (42.0%) had no abnormal findings in the spine on PET (grade 0), 27 (18.0%) had grade 1, 25 (16.7%) had grade 2, 17 (11.3%) had grade 3, and 16 patients (10.7%) had grade 4 18F-FDG uptake for DSD. Two additional patients had apparent spinal metastases with no degenerative changes. Five patients had metastases and DSD (included above). Of the patients who had abnormal spinal findings graded as probable or definite for DSD on CT (grades 3-4), 11 had abnormal findings in the cervical spine, 16 in the thoracic spine, and 23 patients in the lumbosacral spine. Seven patients (4.7%) had PET findings suggestive of spinal metastases. For patients with a maximum regional DSD score of 3, the mean 18F-FDG uptake for that spinal level was 1.4 +/- 1.5, whereas for patients with a maximum regional DSD score of 0, the mean PET grade was significantly lower at 0.4 +/- 0.9 (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Incidental findings on PET suggestive of DSD are common (22% of patients), most common in the lumbosacral spine, and can be recognized on CT. The severity of PET findings correlates with the severity of degenerative disk and facet disease as graded by CT, likely due to the fact that the inflammatory process that accompanies DSD is evident on PET. Increased 18F-FDG uptake in DSD should not be confused with metastatic disease.     

Grading of brain glioma with 1-11C-acetate PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET

The objective of this study is to reevaluate the clinical significance of 1-11C-acetate (ACE) positron emission tomography (PET) in patients with brain glioma, in comparison with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET. METHODS: Ten patients with histologically proven glioma were included in this study. They underwent PET examination with both FDG and ACE on separate days. For ACE PET, 20-min data acquisition was performed just after the administration of 740 MBq of ACE; 10-20-min data were used for the analysis. FDG PET data acquisition for 10 min started 60 min postinjection of 370 MBq of FDG, approximately. Both reconstructed images were converted to standardized uptake value (SUV) images for patient body weight and injected dose. Regions of interest were placed on the tumor and the contralateral cerebral cortex, and SUV and tumor-to-cortex ratio (T/C) were calculated; these values were compared between high- and low-grade gliomas. RESULTS: SUV and T/C of ACE PET showed significant difference (SUV: 2.63+/-0.46 vs. 1.85+/-0.56, P=.03; T/C: 2.36+/-0.63 vs. 1.14+/-0.36, P=.02). In contrast, FDG PET revealed no significant difference in SUV or T/C between high- and low-grade gliomas (SUV: 7.13+/-4.31 vs. 4.71+/-1.27, P=.31; T/C: 0.98+/-0.55 vs. 0.62+/-0.09, P=.22). CONCLUSION: This preliminary study revealed that ACE PET is a promising tracer for the grading of brain glioma.     

18F-FDG PET mapping of regional brain activity in runners

BACKGROUND: To examine regional metabolic changes in the human brain induced by free running in upright posture. METHODS. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Regional brain changes in glucose uptake induced by running were examined by comparing brain images obtained by positron emission tomography (PET) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). SETTING: The study was conducted at a research institute and involved participation of healthy young volunteers. Data sampling and analysis required special imaging device and special computer hardware/software. Participants: Subjects were 17 healthy male volunteers. They were divided at random into two equal groups, those who ran 4-5 km and the others sat in the room. MEASURES: differences in regional cerebral glucose uptake between runners and control groups were assessed statistically. Plasma glucose level was also measured and global cerebral uptake was estimated. RESULTS: Running was associated with a relative increase of glucose uptake in the temporoparietal association cortex, occipital cortex, premotor cortex and the cerebellar vermis. The highest activity was noted in the temporoparietal association cortex. Activity of the primary sensorimotor cortex was higher in the superomedial part (leg motor area) than the lateral part (thorax and arm). CONCLUSIONS: Running augmented energy consumption in the parieto-occipital region relative to the motor area, probably due to the higher energy consumption necessary for integration of multimodal sensory information than for generation of motor output. Our results indicate that FDG PET is a useful tool for brain mapping under various physiological conditions.     

Brain 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementias: comparison with perfusion SPECT and with clinical evaluations lacking nuclear imaging.

The clinical identification and differential diagnosis of dementias is especially challenging in the early stages, but the need for early, accurate diagnosis has become more important, now that several medications for the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) are available. Many neurodegenerative diseases produce significant brain-function alterations detectable with PET or SPECT even when structural images with CT or MRI reveal no specific abnormalities. (18)F-FDG PET images of AD demonstrate focally decreased cerebral metabolism involving especially the posterior cingulate and neocortical association cortices, while largely sparing the basal ganglia, thalamus, cerebellum, and cortex mediating primary sensory and motor functions. Assessment of the precise diagnostic accuracy of PET had until recently been hindered by the paucity of data on diagnoses made using PET and confirmed by definitive histopathologic examination. In the past few years, however, studies comparing neuropathologic examination with PET have established reliable and consistent accuracy for diagnostic evaluations using PET-accuracies substantially exceeding those of comparable studies of the diagnostic value of SPECT or of both modalities assessed side by side, or of clinical evaluations done without nuclear imaging. Similar data are emerging concerning the prognostic value of (18)F-FDG PET. Improvements in the ability of PET to identify very early changes associated with AD and other neurodegenerative dementias are currently outpacing improvements in therapeutic options, but with advances in potential preventive and disease-modifying treatments appearing imminent, early detection and diagnosis will play an increasing role in the management of dementing illness.     

18F-FDG PET/CT和CECT预估胃癌术前分期效能的对照研究

胃癌是世界第四大常见的恶性肿瘤[1].尽管外科手术是唯一治愈胃癌的方法·但胃切除术的并发症及致死率较高[2],个体化制订治疗方案可以避免盲目手术带来的严重并发症和致死率[3].而准确的分期可以优化治疗方案、指导外科手术[2].目前,胃癌术前分期没有金标准影像学手段,使用较多的是基于形态学的增强CT(contrast enhancement CT,CECT)检查[妇,但由于其在判断胃早癌等方面的劣势,CECT在术前分期方面不足以完美胜任.近10余年,由于18F-FDG PET/CT可同时提供解剖和代谢信息,可用于病变监测、肿瘤分期以及疗效评估[5],也逐渐被用于胃癌术前分期的预估,但在胃癌术前分期预估中的效能优劣研究结论不尽一致.     

Clinical value of 11C-methionine PET/CT in patients with plasma cell malignancy: comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT

Purpose

PET/CT using FDG has been widely used for the imaging of various malignant tumours, including plasma cell malignancy (PCM), but ¹¹C-methionine (MET), as a radiolabelled amino acid tracer, may also be useful because PCM is able to activate protein synthesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of PET/CT imaging using MET in PCM, including multiple myeloma, compared with that of FDG PET/CT.

Methods

The study group comprised 20 patients with histologically proven PCM who underwent FDG PET/CT and MET PET/CT scans before (n?=?6) or after (n?=?14) treatment. Semiquantitative analysis was performed on a lesion basis. We also visually evaluated the scans qualitatively using a five-point scale (0, negative; 1, probably negative; 2, equivocal; 3, probably positive; 4, positive) on a lesion and a patient basis. The results were compared between the two scans.

Results

Active PCM was confirmed in 15 patients, including two patients with extramedullary lesions. Uptake of MET tended to be higher (maximum standardized uptake value 10.3 ± 5.6, mean ± SD) than that of FDG (3.4 ± 2.7, p?<?0.001), and more lesions of grade 3 or 4 were depicted by MET (MET 156 lesions vs. FDG 58 lesions). On a patient basis, two patients were accurately diagnosed only by MET. In the remaining 18 patients, consistent results were obtained, but potential upgrade of staging or restaging was necessary in 6 of 11 positive patients because more abnormal lesions were demonstrated by MET. The patient-based sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MET for restaging were 89 %, 100 % and 93 %, respectively, while those of FDG were 78 %, 100 % and 86 %, respectively.

Conclusion

MET revealed an equal or greater number of lesions in PCM than FDG. MET may be especially useful when negative or inconclusive findings are obtained by FDG despite highly suspicious indications of recurrence.     

Early tumor response to Hsp90 therapy using HER2 PET: comparison with 18F-FDG PET.

We compared (68)Ga-DOTA-F(ab')(2)-herceptin (DOTA is 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N',N'-tetraacetic acid [HER2 PET]) and (18)F-FDG PET for imaging of tumor response to the heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor 17-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17AAG). METHODS: Mice bearing BT474 breast tumor xenografts were scanned with (18)F-FDG PET and HER2 PET before and after 17AAG treatment and then biweekly for up to 3 wk. RESULTS: Within 24 h after treatment, a significant decrease in HER2 was measured by HER2 PET, whereas (18)F-FDG PET uptake, a measure of glycolysis, was unchanged. Marked growth inhibition occurred in treated tumors but became evident only by 11 d after treatment. Thus, Her2 downregulation occurs independently of changes in glycolysis after 17AAG therapy, and Her2 reduction more accurately predicts subsequent tumor growth inhibition. CONCLUSION: HER2 PET is an earlier predictor of tumor response to 17AAG therapy than (18)F-FDG PET.     

18F-FDG符合线路显像检测甲状腺癌转移灶的价值

目的　比较18F 脱氧葡萄糖 (FDG)双探头符合线路SPECT(DHCI)与PET显像检测甲状腺癌转移病灶的价值。方法　 2 6例甲状腺癌患者在同 1天分别进行了18F FDGPET和18F FDGDHCI显像 ,患者均已行甲状腺切除术和131I治疗。肿瘤转移病灶大小由计算机自动勾边在PET显像图中测定。结果　 2 6例甲状腺癌患者中 ,18F FDGPET共发现 12 6个肿瘤转移病灶 ,其中18F FDGDHCI检测到 92个 (73 % ) ,CT发现 76个 (6 0 % ) ,18F FDGDHCI的病灶检测率明显高于CT(P <0 0 5 )。根据病灶部位分析 ,18F FDGDHCI与PET对转移病灶检测的符合率在头颈部为 6 8% ,胸部为 83% ,而在骨转移病灶的符合率仅为 5 2 % (P <0 0 1)。根据病灶大小分析 ,当肿瘤转移病灶大于 1 5cm时 ,18F FDGDHCI与PET结果的一致率达 98% ;而在 1～ 1 5cm的病灶检测中 ,18F FDGDHCI仅能发现 5 6 % ;当病灶小于 1cm时 ,18F FDGDHCI则难以发现 ,而PET发现的病灶最小直径为 0 7cm。结论　当肿瘤转移病灶的直径大于 1 5cm时 ,18F FDGDHCI与PET具有相似的诊断准确性。     

The diabetic foot: initial experience with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Osteomyelitis complicates up to one third of diabetic foot infections, is often due to direct contamination from a soft-tissue lesion, and represents a clinical challenge. Early diagnosis is important since antibiotic therapy can be curative and may prevent amputation. The present study assessed the role of PET/CT using 18F-FDG for the diagnosis of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. METHODS: Fourteen diabetic patients (10 men and 4 women; age range, 29-70 y) with 18 clinically suspected sites of infection underwent PET/CT after the injection of 185-370 MBq of 18F-FDG for suspected osteomyelitis complicating diabetic foot disease. PET, CT, and hybrid images were independently evaluated for the diagnosis and localization of an infectious process. Additional data provided by PET/CT for localization of infection in the bone or soft tissues were recorded. The final diagnosis was based on histopathologic findings and bacteriologic assays obtained at surgery or at clinical and imaging follow-up. RESULTS: PET detected 14 foci of increased 18F-FDG uptake suspected as infection in 10 patients. PET/CT correctly localized 8 foci in 4 patients to bone, indicating osteomyelitis. PET/CT correctly excluded osteomyelitis in 5 foci in 5 patients, with the abnormal 18F-FDG uptake limited to infected soft tissues only. One site of mildly increased focal 18F-FDG uptake was localized by PET/CT to diabetic osteoarthropathy changes demonstrated on CT. Four patients showed no abnormally increased 18F-FDG uptake and no further evidence of an infectious process on clinical and imaging follow-up. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET can be used for diagnosis of diabetes-related infection. The precise anatomic localization of increased 18F-FDG uptake provided by PET/CT enables accurate differentiation between osteomyelitis and soft-tissue infection.