<Emphasis Type="Italic">CCND1</Emphasis> amplification and cyclin D1 expression in breast cancer and their relation with proteomic subgroups and patient outcome

INTRODUCTION: Despite strong evidence regarding the role of CCND1 amplification and protein overexpression in breast carcinoma, the associations between CCND1 amplification/cyclin D1 overexpression and clinicopathological variables and clinical outcome remain controversial. AIMS OF THE STUDY: (1) to correlate cyclin D1 expression with gene amplification; (2) to analyse the correlations between CCND1 amplification and overexpression with clinicopathological features and patients' outcome in invasive breast cancer; (3) to define the prevalence and clinical significance of cyclin D1 overexpression and CCND1 amplification in ER positive breast carcinomas (4) to define the prevalence of cyclin D1 overexpression and CCND1 amplification in breast cancers with basal-like immunophenotype. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CCND1 amplification and protein expression were assessed on a tissue microarray containing 880 unselected invasive breast cancer cases, by means of chromogenic in situ hybridisation using the Spotlight CCND1 amplification probe and immunohistochemistry, using the rabbit monoclonal antibody SP4. RESULTS: A total of 59/613 tumours (9.6%) showed CCND1 amplification and 224/514 (43.6%) showed strong cyclin D1 expression. A strong positive correlation between CCND1 amplification and higher levels of cyclin D1 expression was found (P < 0.001). Basal-like cancers showed infrequent CCND1 amplification and cyclin D1 overexpression (P < 0.001). Both CCND1 amplification and cyclin D1 expression were associated with positive ER status. CCND1 gene amplification was an independent prognostic factor for patients with ER positive breast cancer. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate a strong correlation between CCND1 amplification and its protein expression in breast cancer. However, protein expression is more pervasive than gene amplification and associated with ER expression.     

Adverse effect of adjuvant tamoxifen in premenopausal breast cancer with cyclin D1 gene amplification

Cyclins D1 and A2 are cell cycle regulators that also have the ability to interact with the estrogen receptor (ER) and consequently interfere with antiestrogen treatment in breast cancer. Experimental data support this concept, but the clinical relevance needs to be further established. In this study, we evaluated cyclin D1 and A2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry and cyclin D1 gene (CCND1) amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization in 500 primary breast cancers arranged in tissue microarrays. Patients had been randomized to 2 years of adjuvant tamoxifen or no treatment with a median follow-up of 14 years, allowing for subgroup analysis of treatment response defined by cyclin status. We found that both cyclin D1 and A2 protein overexpression was associated with an impaired tamoxifen response, although not significant in multivariate interaction analyses, whereas tamoxifen-treated patients with CCND1-amplified tumors had a substantially increased risk for disease recurrence after tamoxifen treatment in univariate analyses [relative risk (RR), 2.22; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.94-5.26; P = 0.06] in contrast to non-amplified tumors (RR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.23-0.65; P < 0.0001). Consequently, a highly significant interaction between tamoxifen treatment and CCND1 amplification could be shown regarding both recurrence-free survival (RR, 6.38; 95% CI, 2.29-17.78; P < 0.001) and overall survival (RR, 5.34; 95% CI, 1.84-15.51; P = 0.002), suggesting an agonistic effect of tamoxifen in ER-positive tumors. In node-positive patients, the disparate outcome according to gene amplification status was even more accentuated. In summary, our data implicate that despite a significant correlation to cyclin D1 protein expression, amplification status of the CCND1 gene seems a strong independent predictor of tamoxifen response, and possibly agonism, in premenopausal breast cancer.     

High CCND1 amplification identifies a group of poor prognosis women with estrogen receptor positive breast cancer

CCND1 encodes for the cyclin D1 protein involved in G1/S cell cycle transition. In breast cancer the mechanism of CCND1 amplification, relationship between cyclin D1 protein expression and the key clinical markers estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 requires elucidation. Tissue microarrays of primary invasive breast cancer from 93 women were evaluated for CCND1 amplification by fluorescent in‐situ hybridization and cyclin D1 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry. CCND1 amplification was identified in 27/93 (30%) cancers and 59/93 (63%) cancers had overexpression of cyclin D1. CCND1 amplification was significantly associated with cyclin D1 protein overexpression (p < 0.001; Fisher's exact test) and both CCND1 amplification and cyclin D1 protein expression with oestrogen receptor (ER) expression (p = 0.003 and p < 0.001; Fishers exact test). Neither CCND1 amplification nor cyclinD1 expression was associated with tumor size, pathological node status or HER2 amplification, but high CCND1 amplification (Copy Number Gain (CNG) ≥ 8) was associated with high tumor grade (p = 0.005; chi square 7.915, 2 df) and worse prognosis by Nottingham Prognostic Index (p = 0.001; 2 sample t‐test). High CCND1 amplification (CNG ≥ 8) may identify a subset of patients with poor prognosis ER‐positive breast cancers who should be considered for additional therapy.     

Analysis of Cyclin D1 in Breast Cancer: A Call to Arms

The oncogenic capabilities of the cell cycle protein cyclin D1 have long been established in a breast cancer setting. The CCND1 gene is amplified in up to 15 % of breast tumors, with overexpression of its corresponding protein found in up to 50 % of cases. While gene amplification is consistently associated with reduced patient survival times and treatment resistance, repeated attempts to clarify the prognostic and predictive impact of the cyclin D1 protein in breast cancer have yielded contrasting results. Here, we recommend that any examination of cyclin D1 in a patient cohort should begin by determining CCND1 copy number, with subsequent removal and separate analysis of amplified cases. Next, the remaining tumors should be examined for cyclin D1 protein expression in the context of well-defined breast cancer subgroups. Only in this manner can the true clinical value of cyclin D1 be fully elucidated.     

Image cytometry of cyclin D1: a prognostic marker for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

CCND1 gene amplification and cyclin D1 protein overexpression are indicators for poor prognosis in invasive head and neck carcinomas. Increased CCND1 gene dosage is a more sensitive prognostic factor than protein overexpression as evaluated by conventional immunohistochemical techniques. Qualitative immunohistochemistry cannot distinguish cyclin D1 overexpression accompanied by amplification of the CCND1 gene from overexpression associated with normal CCND1 gene copy number. To improve the sensitivity of cyclin D1 protein determination, we applied quantitative techniques of image analysis to evaluate cyclin D1 in 54 head and neck carcinomas. There was a significantly higher rate of occurrence of adverse events (P = 0.043) among patients with CCND1 gene amplification than among those without gene amplification. There was a strong association between CCND1 gene amplification (as detected by Southern blot analysis) and the highest nuclear score (by image cytometry of the immunostained tumor sections). The predominance of cells in the lowest nuclear score category was significantly associated with normal copy number (P = 0.005). Conversely, the highest nuclear score was a significant predictor of gene dosage (P = 0.02). Similarly, high nuclear score was a good predictor of death as the final outcome of the disease (P = 0.01). Although somewhat less accurate than Southern blotting, image cytometry of immunohistochemical cyclin D1 stain appears to be a promising tool that could be useful for other tumor marker expression studies.     

High expression of cyclin D1 is associated to high proliferation rate and increased risk of mortality in women with ER-positive but not in ER-negative breast cancers

Purpose

Cyclin D1 has a central role in cell cycle control and is an important component of estrogen regulation of cell cycle progression. We have previously shown that high cyclin D expression is related to aggressive features of ER-positive but not ER-negative breast cancer. The aims of the present study were to validate this differential ER-related effect and furthermore explore the relationship between cyclin D overexpression and CCND1 gene amplification status in a node-negative breast cancer case–control study.

Methods

Immunohistochemical nuclear expression of cyclin D1 (n = 364) and amplification of the gene CCND1 by fluorescent in situ hybridization (n = 255) was performed on tissue microarray sections from patients with T1-2N0M0 breast cancer. Patients given adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. The primary event was defined as breast cancer death. Breast cancer-specific survival was analyzed in univariate and multivariable models using conditional logistic regression.

Results

Expression of cyclin D1 above the median (61.7%) in ER breast cancer was associated with an increased risk for breast cancer death (OR 3.2 95% CI 1.5–6.8) also when adjusted for tumor size and grade (OR 3.1). No significant prognostic impact of cyclin D1 expression was found among ER-negative cases. Cyclin D1 overexpression was significantly associated to high expression of the proliferation markers cyclins A (ρ 0.19, p = 0.006) and B (ρ 0.18, p = 0.003) in ER-positive tumors, but not in ER-negative cases. There was a significant association between CCND1 amplification and cyclin D1 expression (p = 0.003), but CCND1 amplification was not statistically significantly prognostic (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.4–4.4).

Conclusion

We confirmed our previous observation that high cyclin D1 expression is associated to high proliferation and a threefold higher risk of death from breast cancer in ER-positive breast cancer.

     

Cyclin D1 gene (CCND1) mutations in endometrial cancer

Cyclin D1 is frequently overexpressed in human neoplasias by gene rearrangement and amplification, but no mutations in the CCND1 gene have so far been reported. However, in vitro mutagenesis of CCND1 has shown that substitutions affecting threonine 286 residue produced cyclin D1 nuclear accumulation, by interfering with protein degradation and induced neoplastic transformation in murine fibroblasts. To test whether similar genetic changes may occur in vivo, we analysed a series of 60 endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs) for cyclin D1 expression and gene amplification by immunohistochemistry and FISH, respectively. Two of 17 carcinomas showing cyclin D1 expression in more than 5% of neoplastic cells, but without gene amplification, were found to harbor single-base substitutions in CCND1 that changed proline 287 into threonine and serine, respectively. Both cases expressed cyclin D1 in more than 50% of neoplastic cells. Additionally, seven tumors with cyclin D1 overexpression of an independent series of 59 EECs were also analysed, and a 12-bp in-frame deletion that eliminated amino acids 289-292 was detected in one case with cylin D1 expression in more than 50% of neoplastic cells. In contrast, no mutations of the CCND1 gene were detected in a set of breast carcinomas with cyclin D1 overexpression without gene amplification. In summary, our data indicate that mutations of CCND1, which probably render the protein insensitive to degradation, represent a previously unreported mechanism of cyclin D1 overexpression in human tumors in vivo.     

A clinicopathological study on overexpression of cyclin D1 and of p53 in a series of 248 patients with operable breast cancer.

Overexpression of cyclin D1 is frequently found in various types of human tumours and results from clonal rearrangement and/or amplification involving chromosomal region 11q13. In order to evaluate the pathological relevance of cyclin D1 overexpression in human breast cancer, we generated a polyclonal antiserum against the carboxy-terminal part of the cyclin D1 protein. After affinity purification, the antiserum specifically detected overexpression of cyclin D1 in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumour material also. The intensity of the nuclear stainings was, in general, proportional to the degree of cyclin D1 amplification. We did not encounter significant variability of staining within individual tumours with overexpression of cyclin D1. Overexpression of cyclin D1 appeared to be associated with oestrogen receptor-positive breast tumours, but not with any other clinicopathological parameter tested. Overexpression of cyclin D1 was not prognostic value for recurrence of survival in a consecutive series of 248 operable breast cancer patients (stage I and II). Overexpression of p53 was also not of prognostic significance in this series, but was associated with undifferentiated histology and oestrogen receptor-negative breast tumours, as has been reported previously by others. A high proportion of breast tumours with a low grade of malignancy in this series of operable breast cancer patients may explain discrepancies concerning the prognostic value of amplification and of overexpression of cyclin D1.     

Cyclin D1 overexpression is a negative predictive factor for tamoxifen response in postmenopausal breast cancer patients

Antioestrogen treatment by tamoxifen is a well-established adjuvant therapy for oestrogen receptor-alpha (ERalpha) positive breast cancer. Despite ERalpha expression some tumours do not respond to tamoxifen and we therefore delineated the potential link between the cell cycle regulator and ERalpha co-factor, cyclin D1, and tamoxifen response in a material of 167 postmenopausal breast cancers arranged in a tissue array. The patients had been randomised to 2 years of tamoxifen treatment or no treatment and the median follow-up time was 18 years. Interestingly in the 55 strongly ERalpha positive samples with moderate or low cyclin D1 levels, patients responded to tamoxifen treatment whereas the 46 patients with highly ERalpha positive and cyclin D1 overexpressing tumours did not show any difference in survival between tamoxifen and no treatment. Survival in untreated patients with cyclin D1 high tumours was slightly better than for patients with cyclin D1 low/moderate tumours. However, there was a clearly increased risk of death in the cyclin D1 high group compared to an age-matched control population. Our results suggest that cyclin D1 overexpression predicts for tamoxifen treatment resistance in breast cancer, which is line with recent experimental data using breast cancer cell lines and overexpression systems.     

Expression and subcellular localization of cyclin D1 protein in epithelial ovarian tumour cells

The expression of cyclin D1 protein in tumour sections from 81 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer was analysed using immunohistochemistry. The tumours that overexpressed cyclin D1 in more than 10% of neoplastic cells were considered positive. Thus overexpression of cyclin D1 was observed in 72/81 (89%) of the cases examined. Protein was detected in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm in 24/81 (30%) and localized exclusively in the cytoplasm in 48/81 (59%) of the tumours. Cyclin D1 was overexpressed in both borderline and invasive tumours. There was no association between protein overexpression and tumour stage and differentiation. Furthermore, no correlation between cyclin D1 expression and clinical outcome was observed. However, in tumours overexpressing cyclin D1 (n = 72), the proportion displaying exclusively cytoplasmic localization of protein was higher in those with serous compared with non-serous histology (P = 0.004, odds ratio 4.8, 95% confidence interval 1.4-19.1). Western analysis using a monoclonal antibody to cyclin D1 identified a 36 kDa protein in homogenates from seven tumours displaying cytoplasmic only and one tumour demonstrating both nuclear and cytoplasmic immunostaining. Using restriction fragment length polymorphism polymerase chain reaction and PCR-multiplex analysis, amplification of the cyclin D1 gene (CCND1 was detected in 1/29 of the tumours demonstrating overexpression of cyclin D1 protein. We conclude that deregulation of CCND1 expression leading to both cytoplasmic and nuclear protein localization is a frequent event in ovarian cancer and occurs mainly in the absence of gene amplification.     

Role of cyclin D1 in ErbB2-positive breast cancer and tamoxifen resistance

Cyclin D1 plays an important role in the regulation of the G1 phase in the cell cycle. In mammary epithelial cells the expression of cyclin D1 is regulated through the oestrogen receptor and via ErbB2 signalling. Here we investigated the prognostic significance of cyclin D1 among 230 breast cancer patients randomised for tamoxifen, CMF chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The importance of combined cyclin D1 and ErbB2 overexpression was also analysed. Immunohistochemical analysis of the cyclin D1 expression resulted in 69 (29.8%) weakly positive, 107 (46.5%) moderately positive and 54 (23.7%) strongly positive cases. The prognostic importance of ErbB2 was significantly greater for patients whose tumours overexpressed cyclin D1 than for other patients (p = 0.026). In the former group, ErbB2 overexpression was strongly associated with increased risk of recurrence (RR = 4.7; 95% CI, 2.1–10.4) and breast cancer death (RR = 5.4; 95% CI, 2.3–12.6). This result is in accordance with experimental studies demonstrating a link between cyclin D1 and ErbB2 in oncogenesis. Among oestrogen receptor positive patients, those with moderate cyclin D1 expression significantly did benefit from tamoxifen treatment (RR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21–0.82) whereas those with weak or strong expression did not. Therefore cyclin D1 might be a predictive marker for tamoxifen resistance.     

Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen on lipid metabolism in Japanese postmenopausal women with early breast cancer

Endocrine therapies that profoundly decrease estrogen levels potentially have a detrimental effect on the cardiovascular system. This study evaluated the effect on lipid metabolism of one such agent, the new generation aromatase inhibitor anastrozole, compared with tamoxifen, when used as adjuvant treatment in postmenopausal Japanese women with early breast cancer. All patients had completed primary surgery and were randomized to anastrozole 1 mg once daily (n=22) or tamoxifen 20 mg once daily (n=22). Anastrozole significantly reduced levels of triglycerides and remnant-like particle cholesterol, whereas tamoxifen significantly increased these. Activity of lipoprotein lipase and levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly increased after anastrozole treatment. In contrast, activity of hepatic triglyceride lipase, also a key enzyme of triglyceride metabolism, significantly decreased following treatment with tamoxifen. We thus conclude that in our study anastrozole had a beneficial effect on lipid profiles of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer after 12 weeks of treatment.     

Prognostic significance of cyclin D1 amplification and overexpression in oral squamous cell carcinomas

Amplification and overexpression of cyclin D1 (CCND1) have been reported as independent prognostic indicators of several tumors. To investigate the association between CCND1 amplification and overexpression in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs), and to determine which is more reliable as a prognostic indicator, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies and immunohistochemistry were performed on 41 primary OSCCs (26 males, 15 females; mean age; 58.4 years, range 21-89 years). Thirteen patients were stage I, 13 were stage II, nine were stage III, and six were stage IV. CCND1 amplification and overexpression was detected in 13 (31.7%) and 27 (65.9%) of 41 cases. CCND1 was overexpressed in all cases showing CCND1 amplification. On the other hand, CCND1 overexpression was also detected in 14 of 28 cases (50.0%) lacked such amplification. Statistical analysis showed that the correlation between CCND1 overexpression and decreased survival just failed to reach statistical significance, and CCND1 amplification and nodal status were independent prognostic indicators. In conclusion, it will be necessary to investigate the other pathways that regulate CCND1 expression besides CCND1 amplification. From the present study, CCND1 amplification is a more reliable prognostic indicator than CCND1 overexpression in OSCCs.     

Three years' follow-up from the ATAC trial is sufficient to change clinical practice: a debate

Tamoxifen is currently the adjuvant treatment of choice for postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer. However, in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced disease, the third-generation aromatase inhibitor anastrozole ('Arimidex') has been shown to be at least as effective as tamoxifen, and to be more effective than tamoxifen in patients with estrogen receptor-positive disease. Furthermore, anastrozole is well tolerated and is associated with fewer adverse reactions (such as thromboembolic events, vaginal bleeding, and endometrial cancer) compared with tamoxifen. A change in clinical practice has now emerged for the first-line treatment of postmenopausal advanced disease in patients, with tamoxifen becoming the second- or third-line choice for many clinicians. These data have raised questions about the optimal adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. The 'Arimidex', Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial has compared the efficacy and safety of tamoxifen and anastrozole in the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. At 3 years' follow-up in the overall population, anastrozole demonstrated a significant benefit compared with tamoxifen for disease-free survival (DFS) (89.4% vs. 87.4%; p = 0.013), time to recurrence (hazard ratio = 0.79; p = 0.008), and contralateral breast cancers (odds ratio = 0.42; 95% confidence interval: 0.22-0.79; p = 0.007). Anastrozole produced improvements in quality of life similar to tamoxifen and was better tolerated for a number of predefined adverse events. Of course, a large body of evidence is available regarding the safety profile of tamoxifen and some feel that more data are needed from the ATAC trial to demonstrate that the early advantages of anastrozole over tamoxifen can be maintained in the longer term. However, a follow-up analysis at 47 months has confirmed that the tolerability profile and the absolute benefit of anastrozole were maintained over the extended follow-up period, demonstrating that the benefits of anastrozole are likely to be maintained over the long term. This review assesses these and other data from the ATAC trial and presents the arguments for and against whether 3 years' follow-up is sufficient to inform a change in clinical practice for the adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer.     

Clinical potential of the mTOR targets S6K1 and S6K2 in breast cancer

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and its substrates S6K1 and S6K2 regulate cell growth, proliferation, and metabolism through translational control. RPS6KB1 (S6K1) and RPS6KB2 (S6K2) are situated in the commonly amplified 17q21–23 and 11q13 regions. S6K1 amplification and protein overexpression have earlier been associated with a worse outcome in breast cancer, but information regarding S6K2 is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic and treatment predictive relevance of S6K1/S6K2 gene amplification, as well as S6K2 protein expression in breast cancer. S6K1/S6K2 gene copy number was determined by real-time PCR in 207 stage II breast tumors and S6K2 protein expression was investigated by immunohistochemistry in 792 node-negative breast cancers. S6K1 amplification/gain was detected in 10.7%/21.4% and S6K2 amplification/gain in 4.3%/21.3% of the tumors. S6K2 protein was detected in the nucleus (38%) and cytoplasm (76%) of the tumor cells. S6K1 amplification was significantly associated with HER2 gene amplification and protein expression. S6K2 amplification correlated significantly with high S6K2 mRNA levels, ER+ status and CCND1 amplification. S6K1 and S6K2 gene amplification was associated with a worse prognosis independent of HER2 and CCND1. S6K2 gain and nuclear S6K2 expression was related to an improved benefit from tamoxifen among patients with ER+, respectively ER+/PgR+ tumors. In the ER+/PgR− subgroup, nuclear S6K2 rather indicated decreased tamoxifen responsiveness. S6K1 amplification predicted reduced benefit from radiotherapy. This is the first study showing that S6K2 amplification and overexpression, like S6K1 amplification, have prognostic and treatment predictive significance in breast cancer.     

Cyclin A is a prognostic indicator in early stage breast cancer with and without tamoxifen treatment

Overexpression of G1-S regulators cyclin D1 or cyclin A is frequently observed in breast cancer and is also to result in ligand-independent activation of oestrogen receptor in vitro. This might therefore, provide a mechanism for failure of tamoxifen treatment. We examined by immunohistochemical staining the effect of deregulation of these, and other cell cycle regulators on tamoxifen treatment in a group of 394 patients with early stage breast cancer. In univariate analysis, expression of cyclin A, Neu, Ki-67 index, and lack of OR expression were significantly associated with worse prognosis. When adjusted by the clinical model (for lymph node status, age, performance status, T-classification, grade, prior surgery, oestrogen receptor status and tamoxifen use), only overexpression of cyclin A and Neu were significantly associated with worse prognosis with hazard ratios of, respectively, 1.709 (P=0.0195) and 1.884 (P=0.0151). Overexpression of cyclin A was found in 86 out of the 201 OR-positive cases treated with tamoxifen, and was the only independent marker associated with worse prognosis (hazard ratio 2.024, P=0.0462). In conclusion, cyclin A is an independent predictor of recurrence of early stage breast cancer and is as such a marker for response in patients treated with tamoxifen.