Screw fixation of craniocervical junction

In recent years an increase has been observed of the use of screw techniques for the fixation of the craniocervical junction. For clinical use two techniques have been introduced: (1) transarticular screw fixation, and (2) transpedicular screw fixation. In the former the screw is inserted through the C2 lateral mass, the fissure of the C1-C2 joint, and the C1 lateral mass. (2) in the latter the screw is inserted into the C2 pedicle and anchored in C2 vertebral body. Transarticular or pedicle screws can be easily connected to longitudinal elements such as rods or plates, and combined with lateral mass screws of the remaining cervical vertebrae or occipital screws. In comparison to sublaminar wiring or interlaminar clamping the screw techniques: (a) strengthen the stiffness of the construct and speed up fusion, (b) allow fixation in the absence or deficiency of laminae as a result of trauma or laminectomy, and (c) can selectively include only the affected segments. Increased construct stiffness is due to deep anchorage of the screw in bone providing thus a solid grip on the vertebra. Both techniques require preoperative assessment of the course of the vertebral artery using imaging methods. In about 18% of cases abnormal course of the artery precludes screw use. Pedicle screw insertion requires direct control of the medial and superior walls of C2 pedicle with dissector introduced into the vertebral canal, which requires removal of the atlantoaxial ligament. Additional control can be achieved with lateral fluoroscopy. The entry point for transarticular screw is on the lateral mass of the odontoid 2-3 mm laterally to the medial margin of C2 facet and 2-3 mm above the C1/C2 articular fissure. The screw trajectory is 0-10 degrees in horizontal plane and towards the anterior C1 tuberculum in sagittal plane.     

Fusions at the craniovertebral junction

INTRODUCTION: The surgical management of craniovertebral junction instability in pediatric patients has unique challenges. While the indications for internal fixation in children are similar to those of adults, the data concerning techniques, complications, and outcomes of spinal instrumentation comes from experience with adult patients. Diminutive osseous and ligamentous structures and anatomical variations associated with syndromic craniovertebral abnormalities frequently complicates the approaches and limits the use of internal fixation in children. Cervical arthrodesis in the pediatric age group has the potential for limiting growth potential and causing secondary deformity. Recent advances in image analysis have enabled preoperative planning which is critical to evaluate the size of instrumentation and its relation to the patient's anatomy. Newer techniques have recently evolved and have been incorporated in the management of pediatric patients with requirement for craniocervical stabilization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Over 750 craniovertebral junction fusions have been reviewed in children. The indications for atlantoaxial arthrodesis were: (a) absent odontoid process, dystopic os odontoideum, absent posterior arch of C1; (b) Morquio's syndrome, Goldenhar's syndrome, Conradi's syndrome, and spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia. The acquired abnormalities of trauma, postinfectious instability, and Down's syndrome completed the indication in children. The indications for occipitocervical fusion were: (a) anterior and posterior bifid C1 arches with instability, absent occipital condyles; b) severe reducible basilar invagination, unstable dystopic os odontoideum, and unilateral atlas assimilation; (c) acquired phenomenon with traumatic occipitocervical dislocation, complex craniovertebral junction fractures of C1 and C2, after transoral craniovertebral junction decompression, cranial settling in Down's syndrome and inflammatory disease such as Grisel's syndrome. Instability was seen in children with clivus chordoma and osteoblastoma. Atlantoaxial fusions were performed mainly with interlaminar rib graft fusion and more recently with the transarticular screw fixation in the older patient. In the teenager, lateral mass screws at C1 and rod fixation were made; C2 pars interarticular screw fixation and C2 pedicle screw fixation. A C2 translaminar screw fixation is described. Occipitocervical fusions were made utilizing rib grafts below the age of 6. A contoured loop fixation was made in children above the age of 7, and recently, rod and screw fixation was also utilized. RESULTS: Abnormal cervical spine growth was not seen in children who underwent craniocervical stabilization below the age of 5. The authors have reserved rigid instrumentation for children above the age of 10 years and dependent on the anatomy.     

Posterior Atalntoaxial Fusion with C1 Lateral Mass Screw and C2 Pedicle Screw Supplemented with Miniplate Fixation for Interlaminar Fusion : A Preliminary Report

Objective

To investigate the feasibility of C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicle screw with polyaxial screw and rod system supplemented with miniplate for interlaminar fusion to treat various atlantoaxial instabilities.

Methods

After posterior atlantoaxial fixation with lateral mass screw in the atlas and pedicle screw in the axis, we used 2 miniplates to fixate interlaminar iliac bone graft instead of sublaminar wiring. We performed this procedure in thirteen patients who had atlantoaxial instabilities and retrospectively evaluated the bone fusion rate and complications.

Results

By using this method, we have achieved excellent bone fusion comparing with the result of other methods without any complications related to this procedure.

Conclusion

C1 lateral mass screw and C2 pedicle screw with polyaxial screw and rod system supplemented with miniplate for interlaminar fusion may be an efficient alternative method to treat various atlantoaxial instabilities.     

C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation for treatment of C1-C2 instability

C1-C2 instability has traditionally been treated by C1-C2 posterior wiring and bone grafting. However, this technique has an incidence of non-union which may exceed 10%. Transarticular screw fixation has developed as a technique of providing increased strength of fixation of C1-C2 arthrodesis, while at the same time avoiding the need for postoperative halo bracing and avoiding the risk of neurological injury associated with the passage of sublaminar wires. We present a retrospective review of 12 patients with C1-C2 instability treated by C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation. Eight patients underwent this procedure as primary treatment, and 4 after a failed Gallie fusion. Five patients had a cruciate ligament rupture, 5 had an odontoid process fracture, 1 had os odontoideum, and 1 had rheumatoid instability. There was no surgical morbidity or mortality and, at a mean follow up of 12.1 +/- 3 months (range 8-14 months), all patients had achieved solid fusion, and all neurological symptoms referable to the instability had resolved. C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation has been shown to be safe and effective and has a number of advantages when compared to traditional posterior wiring techniques. We recommend that this technique be considered as a primary treatment of C1-C2 instability.     

Management of acute odontoid fractures with single anterior screw fixation

The use of anterior odontoid screw fixation has grown in popularity for the management of acute, unstable Anderson and d'Alonzo Type II and rostral Type III odontoid fractures. This study critically reviews our clinical experience of 48 patients with single odontoid screw fixation for the treatment of Type II and Type III odontoid fractures between 1997 and 2001. This series had a complication rate of 10% (malposition rate 6% and non-union rate 4%), with a satisfactory overall fusion rate of 96%. Odontoid screw fixation is technically demanding and requires strict patient selection, thorough preoperative planning and careful surgical technique. In our experience, advanced age should not be considered a contraindication to anterior odontoid screw fixation, as satisfactory results can be obtained in some of these patients. This study also emphasises that sagittally oblique type II fractures are associated with a high rate of fusion failure when treated by anterior odontoid screw fixation, and should be treated with other instrumentation methods, such as posterior atlantoaxial arthrodesis.     

Salvage posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques: A retrospective study

ObjectSince the atlantoaxial region have critical neurovascular anatomy and limited bone surface for fusion, the application and choice of salvage fixation techniques are highly important. To discuss alternative posterior atlantoaxial fixation surgery techniques.MethodsWe retrospectively surgical records of 22 patients that posterior atlantoaxial fixation techniques were applied.ResultsThe patients included 11 males and 11 females (mean age: 65.7 years). The fracture type that caused instability is type 2 odontoid fractures (22). In six of these patients alternative stabilization techniques were applied due to anatomical variations, huge venous bleeding and iatrogenic trauma of the screw entry points during surgery.ConclusionsOwing to anatomical variations, intraoperative challenges, and/or instrumentation failures, performing alternative surgical fixation technique is an important factor that affects the success of stabilization of the atlantoaxial region. Knowledge of salvage techniques especially during the learning curve is vitally important. Surgeons should adapt to intraoperative surgical challenges as required.     

Posterior percutaneous transarticular stand-alone screw instrumentation of C1-C2 with endoscopic assistance: A report of two cases

We present two cases of minimally invasive posterior transarticular screw fixation of C1-C2. The points for screw insertion were visualized by endoscopy via the instrumental port. A patient with a type III odontoid fracture with subluxation underwent a minimally invasive posterior stand-alone transarticular screw fixation. Despite the application of compression screws, for technical reasons, only minimal compression on the anterior third of the C1-C2 lateral joint was achieved. However, complete fracture fusion was achieved with stable fibrous C1-C2 fusion 2.5 years postoperatively. A second patient with a chronic type II odontoid fracture underwent percutaneous C1-C2 fixation by the same method. After 2 years, fracture fusion and C1-C2 lateral mass ankylosis were achieved. The use of a tubular retractor and endoscopy in stand-alone screw fixation of C1-C2 allows direct visualization of the screw entry point and decreases surgical trauma. This procedure might be an alternative to other methods of transarticular instrumentation.     

Protection of the C1 posterior arch in atlantal lateral mass fixation: technical case report.

Screw fixation of the C1 lateral mass is a relatively new technique designed to allow for C1/C2 fixation in scenarios where transarticular screw fixation is not safe or possible. In order to place the screw at the base of the C1 arch, it has been recommended to drill at the junction of the C1 posterior arch and the lateral mass of C1, to accommodate the screw head. This may, however, weaken the C1 arch, making it prone to fracture. In this new technique, we describe a modification to the current technique to allow placement of this screw without compromising the C1 arch. A case of atlantoaxial instability secondary to os odontoideum is described. C1 lateral mass fixation is achieved by selecting a screw 10 mm longer than required and placing the screw 10 mm above the bony entry point, for easier placement of the rod and avoidance of drilling at the base of the C1 arch. Adequate and safe C1/C2 fixation was achieved. Sublaminar wiring was performed around the C1 arch with no weakening or fracture of the arch. We believe that in order to place reasonable C1 lateral mass screws, it is inadvisable to drill the base of the junction between the C1 posterior arch and lateral mass as this may lead to arch weakening and failure. Easier instrumentation can be performed and the integrity of the C1 arch maintained using this alternate technique.     

Odontoid screw fixation for fresh and remote fractures

Fractures of the odontoid process are common, accounting for 10% to 20% of all cervical spine fractures. Odontoid process fractures are classified into three types depending on the location of the fracture line. Various treatment options are available for each of these fracture types and include application of a cervical orthosis, direct anterior screw fixation, and posterior cervical fusion. If a patient requires surgical treatment of an odontoid process fracture, the timing of treatment may affect fusion rates, particularly if direct anterior odontoid screw fixation is selected as the treatment method. For example, type II odontoid fractures treated within the first 6 months of injury with direct anterior odontoid screw fixation have an 88% fusion rate, whereas fractures treated after 18 months have only a 25% fusion rate. In this review, we discuss the etiology, biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment (including factors affecting fusion such as timing and fracture orientation) options available for odontoid process fractures.     

Clinical Outcomes of Halo-Vest Immobilization and Surgical Fusion of Odontoid Fractures

Objective

In the present study, authors retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of halo-vest immobilization (HVI) versus surgical fixation in patients with odontoid fracture after either non-surgical treatment (HVI) or with surgical fixation.

Methods

From April 1997 to December 2008, we treated a total of 60 patients with upper cervical spine injuries. This study included 31 (51.7%) patients (22 men, 9 women; mean age, 39.3 years) with types II and III odontoid process fractures. The average follow-up was 25.1 months. We reviewed digital radiographs and analyzed images according to type of injury and treatment outcomes, following conservative treatment with HVI and surgical management with screw fixation.

Results

There were a total of 31 cases of types II and III odontoid process fractures (21 odontoid type II fractures, 10 type III fractures). Fifteen patients underwent HVI (10 type II fractures, 5 type III fractures). Nine (60%) out of 15 patients who underwent HVI experienced successful healing of odontoid fractures. The mean period for bone healing was 20.2 weeks. Sixteen patients underwent surgery including anterior screw fixation (6 cases), posterior C1-2 screw fixation (8), and transarticular screw fixation (2) for healing the odontoid fractures (11 type II fractures, 5 type III fractures). Fifteen (93.8%) out of 16 patients who underwent surgery achieved healing of cervical fractures. The average bone healing time was 17.6 weeks.

Conclusion

The overall healing rate was 60% after HVI and 93.8% with surgical management. Patients treated with surgery showed a higher fusion rate and shorter bony healing time than patients who received HVI. However, prospective studies are needed in the future to define better optimal treatment and cost-effective perspective for the treatment of odontoid fractures.     

Is All Anterior Oblique Fracture Orientation Really a Contraindication to Anterior Screw Fixation of Type II and Rostral Shallow Type III Odontoid Fractures?

Objective

It is debatable whether an anterior oblique fracture orientation is really a contraindication to anterior odontoid screw fixation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of anterior odontoid screw fixation of type II and rostral shallow type III fracture with an anterior oblique fracture orientation.

Methods

The authors evaluated 16 patients with type II and rostral shallow type III odontoid fracture with an anterior oblique fracture orientation. Of these 16 patients, 8 (group 1) were treated by anterior odontoid screw fixation, and 8 (group 2) by a posterior C1-2 arthrodesis.

Results

Of the 8 patients in group 1, seven patients achieved solid bone fusion (87.5%), and one experienced screw back-out of the C-2 body two months after anterior screw fixation. All patients treated by posterior C1-C2 fusion in group 2 achieved successful bone fusion. Mean fracture displacements and fracture gaps were not significantly different in two groups. (p=0.075 and 0.782). However, mean fracture orientation angles were 15.3±3.2 degrees in group 1, and 28.6+8.1 degrees in group 2 (p=0.002), and mean fragment angulations were 3.2±2.1 degrees in group 1, and 14.8±6.7 degrees in group 2 (p=0.001).

Conclusion

Even when the fracture lines of type II and rostral shallow type III fractures are oriented in an anterior oblique direction, anterior odontoid screw fixation can be feasible in carefully selected patients with a relatively small fracture orientation angle and relatively small fragment angulation.     

Posterior transarticular screw fixation for chronic atlanto-axial instability.

Treatment for chronic atlanto-axial instability remains problematic despite recent innovations in new surgical techniques and instrumentation. Our team reviewed a series of 23 cases of patients with chronic atlanto-axial instability who underwent posterior transarticular screw fixation operations between May 1998 and September 2002. Etiologies of these patients included failed prior surgery, rheumatoid arthritis, congenital anomalies and old odontoid fractures. The clinical presentations were nuchal pain and cervical myelopathy or radiculopathy, with sensory and/or motor deficits that persisted for more than 3 months. We routinely used external reduction to realign the C1-C2 axis prior to operating, and operated on patients using halo-vest fixation. After surgery, the halo-vest was replaced by a collar. In the post-operative follow-up, 22 of the 23 patients (96%) were found to have achieved solid, bony or fibrous union of the C1-C2 axis. Eleven of the 14 (79%) patients with pre-operative neck pain experienced immediate relief or significant improvement. Thirteen of the 20 patients (65%) with myelo-radiculopathy demonstrated improvement of previous motor deficits. Major morbidity included a vertebral artery (VA) injury and a malpositioned screw. No cases of mortality or neurological complications occurred in this series. Posterior transarticular C1-C2 screw fixation results in a high fusion rate without the additional need for rigid external immobilization. It allows good neurological recovery in cases of chronic atlanto-axial instability. Judicious pre-surgical planning and meticulous operative technique may avoid neurological complications and vertebral artery injury.     

Odontoid compression of the brainstem without basilar impression-- "odontoid invagination".

We report five patients with odontoid invagination, in which the odontoid process bulges upward into the foramen magnum and compresses the brainstem without deformity of the occipital bone. Two patients had a craniovertebral abnormality associated with Chiari malformation without instability of the craniovertebral junction (stable odontoid invagination). The other three patients had dislocation of the craniovertebral junction due to iatrogenic destruction of the occipital condyle, rheumatoid arthritis or an anomaly of C2 (unstable odontoid invagination). Patients with stable odontoid invagination underwent a transoral odontoidectomy followed by occipitocervical fixation. Those with unstable odontoid invagination underwent cervical traction followed by posterior fixation in reducible cases, while in irreducible cases odontoidectomy with subsequent occipitocervical fixation was performed. Decompression of the neuraxis together with symptomatic improvement was achieved in all patients and none became unstable or developed new symptoms during follow-up ranging from 3 to 15 years.     

颈枕融合术治疗复杂颅颈交界区畸形的疗效分析

目的 探讨颈枕融合术治疗复杂颅颈交界区畸形的疗效。方法 回顾性分析2012年2月至2018年2月武汉大学人民医院神经外科行枕颈融合术治疗的23例复杂颅颈交界区畸形的临床资料。3例行经口齿状突切除+后路枕颈固定融合术,20例行寰枢椎复位+后颅窝减压+后路枕颈固定融合术。结果 术后2周齿状突与钱氏线距离、日本骨科协会评分、延髓-脊髓角、寰齿间距较术前均明显改善（P<0.05）。23例术后随访半年至5年,均未出现关节松动,内固定及植骨均较为牢靠;复查头颈部MRI均示脊髓压迫明显减轻,寰枕关节复位良好,内固定固定良好。结论 颈枕融合术治疗复杂颅颈交界区畸形是一种安全且有效的方式。     

Resultados de la fijación transarticular C1-C2 en una serie de 20 pacientes

ObjectiveC1-C2 transarticular fixation is an increasingly used surgical method of treating atlantoaxial instability. When properly performed, it can safely provide fusion rates near 100%, but techniques of fixation in this region allow only a small margin of error. We here report the results of C1-C2 transarticular fixation in a series of 20 patients in which different procedures were selected according to the presenting disorder in each case.MethodsThe study group included 9 men and 11 women with a mean age of 48 years (range 17 to 68 years). The causes of instabilities were rheumatoid arthritis in nine patients, type II and III Hangman's fracture of traumatic origin in nine (in association with other lesions in three cases), pseudoarthrosis after type II odontoid fracture in one, and type III complex Cl fracture in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis. Preoperative assessment included flexion and extension plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Operations included transarticular screw fixation in all cases; in patients with rheumatoid arthritis it was associated with sublaminar fixation and bone grafting following Sonntag's technique in all but two cases. Postoperative results were evaluated in relation to the biomechanical stability and fusion was studied by flexion and extension radiographs and CT scans. Pain relief in patients with rheumatoid arthritis patients was assessed using a 0–10 visual analogic scale (V.A.S.).ResultsIn the traumatic group, a consolidation of the fracture and radiologic stability was achieved in all cases. In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, pain improved in all but not the neurological deficit, and in all cases a C1-C2 biomechanical stability was reached despite interlaminar graft resorption in two (25%) cases. With respect to complications, a lesión of the vertebral artery occurred in one case, deviation of the screw in two cases, and breakage of the screw without clinical repercussion in two other cases.ConclusionC1-C2 transarticular screw fixation was a useful technique to achieve satisfacory biomechanical stability in patients with atlatoaxial instability of both inflammatory and traumatic origin with a low rate of complications.     

Magnetic resonance imaging confirmation of resolution of periodontoid pannus formation following C1/C2 posterior transarticular screw fixation.

Chronic odontoid fractures are considered unstable spinal lesions. Chronic instability in this region leads to the development of an inflammatory pannus, which can progress resulting in spinal cord compression radiographically and a myelopathy syndrome clinically. In this report we document three cases of reversal of pannus after C1/C2 transarticular screw fixation of an unstable odontoid fracture. Three patients were identified with chronic odontoid fractures and spinal cord compression due to periodontoid pannus formation. All patients presented with a progressive myelopathy syndrome. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the craniovertebral junction. C1/C2 transarticular screw fixation was performed for stabilization of C1/C2. Postoperatively there were no complications. Postoperative MRI at 6 months demonstrated resolution of the ventral pannus. Moreover, all patients exhibited improvement of preoperative neurological deficits. MRI is the imaging technique of choice for diagnosis and follow-up of patients with chronic odontoid fractures and ventral pannus. C1/C2 transarticular screw fixation provides a viable method for spinal stabilization in this region. In addition, stabilization can result in resolution of inflammatory pannus formation secondary to instability of the C1/C2 articulation.     

Posterior reduction and instrumentation with rod-screw construct for atlanto-axial dislocation: A single institutional study with 21 consecutive cases

Objective

Atlanto-axial dislocation is one of the leading causes for occipito-cervical instability. This study aimed for investigating the clinical outcome of rod-screw construct rather than traditional posterior wiring for atlanto-axial dislocation.

Methods

Twenty one consecutive atlanto-axial dislocation patients undergoing surgery in our institution from April 2008 to May 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. Posterior reduction and instrumentation between occipital/C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle, and concomitant occipital-atlanto-axial fusion were achieved with polyaxial-screw and rod construct. Clinical outcomes and complications were analyzed postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months.

Results

The satisfactory repositioning and internal fixation of the atlanto-axial joint, rigid screw placement and successful atlanto-axial fusion were confirmed in the 20 cases during follow-up. One patient died of a secondary ischemic injury to the brainstem 12 days after operation. The exception was a pediatric patient with loosened screws at 3 months follow-up postoperatively. Importantly, clinical symptoms and neurological function were significantly improved in all 20 cases during each follow-up as compared to preoperative scenarios. In addition, we noted that ischemic injury and screw detachment may be the main surgical risks.

Conclusions

This surgical procedure provided satisfactory reduction of the atlanto-axial joint with significant neurological improvement. Moreover, we successfully avoided complications of posterior wiring.     

Atlantoaxial dislocation

Atlanto-axial dislocations (AADs) may be classified into four varieties depending upon the direction and plane of the dislocation i.e. anteroposterior, rotatory, central, and mixed dislocations. However, from the surgical point of view these are divided into two categories i.e. reducible (RAADs) and irreducible (IAADs). Posterior fusion is the treatment of choice for RAAD. Transarticular screw fixation with sub-laminar wiring is the most stable& method of posterior fusion. Often, IAAD is due to inadequate extension in dynamic X-ray study which may also be due to spasm of muscles. If the anatomy at the occipito-atlanto-axial region {O-C1-C2; O: occiput, C1: atlas, C2: axis} is normal on X-ray, the dislocation should be reducible. In case congenital anomalies at O-C1-C2 and IAAD are seen on flexion/extension studies of the cervical spine, the C1-C2 joints should be seen in computerized tomography scan (CT). If the C1-C2 joint facet surfaces are normal, the AAD should be reducible by cervical traction or during surgery by mobilizing the joints. The entity termed "dolichoodontoid" does not exist. It is invariably C2-C3 (C3- third cervical vertebra) fusion which gives an appearance of dolichoodontoid on plain X-ray or on mid-saggital section of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or CT scan. The central dislocation and axial invagination should not be confused with basilar invagination. Transoral odontoidectomy alone is never sufficient in cases of congenital IAAD, adequate generous three-dimensional decompression while protecting the underlying neural structures should be achieved. Chronic post-traumatic IAAD are usually Type II odontoid fractures which get malunited or nonunited with pseudoarthrosis in dislocated position. All these dislocations can be reduced by transoral removal of the offending bone, callous and fibrous tissue.     

Atlantoaxial fixation: overview of all techniques

Over the past century, steady advances have been made in fixating an unstable atlantoaxial complex. Current options for fixation of the atlantoaxial complex include posterior clamps, posterior wiring techniques, C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation, posterior C1 lateral mass screw with C2 pars or pedicle screw fixation, and anterior transoral C1 lateral mass to C2 vertebral body fixation.