Ulnar shortening osteotomy in idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome can be defined as a degenerative condition of the ulnar aspect of the wrist in patients with congenital or dynamic positive ulnar variance without a history of fracture or premature physeal arrest. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome and the outcomes of ulnar shortening osteotomy for this group of patients. METHODS: Thirty-one wrists in twenty-nine patients with idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome were treated with an ulnar shortening osteotomy. Ulnar variance was measured on an anteroposterior radiograph of the wrist, and radioulnar distance was measured on a lateral radiograph, with the forearm in neutral rotation, to evaluate any displacement of the ulnar head from the distal aspect of the radius. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean of thirty-two months. RESULTS: An average preoperative ulnar variance of +4.6 mm (range, 2 to 7.5 mm) was reduced to an average of -0.7 mm (range, -4 to +1 mm) postoperatively. Preoperatively, the modified Gartland and Werley score was an average (and standard deviation) of 69.5 +/- 7.6, with twenty-four wrists rated poor and seven rated fair. Postoperatively, the score improved to an average of 92.5 +/- 8.0, with twenty-four wrists rated excellent; five, good; one, fair; and one, poor. Dorsal subluxation of the distal aspect of the ulna was found concomitantly in nine wrists, and it was found to be reduced by the shortening osteotomy. Seven patients had cystic changes in the carpal bones preoperatively, but these were not evident one to two years after the operation. CONCLUSIONS: Ulnar shortening osteotomy improved wrist function in patients with idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome and reduced the subluxation of the distal radioulnar joint, which is commonly found in these patients. Degenerative cystic changes of the ulnar carpal bones appear to resolve following the shortening osteotomy.     

Results of the wafer procedure for ulnar impaction syndrome in the ulnar negative and neutral wrist

Thirteen wrists with ulnar neutral or negative variance were treated by open distal ulna excision (the wafer procedure). The mean follow-up was 25 months (range, 12-38). At final follow-up grip strength had increased a mean of 14 kgf and 12 of the 13 patients were very satisfied with the functional outcome and pain relief. In treatment of the ulnar impaction syndrome, the wafer procedure provides excellent pain relief and functional restoration particularly in patients with ulnar neutral or negative wrists in whom triangular fibrocartilage tears have not yet developed.     

The effect of radial shortening on wrist joint mechanics in cadaver specimens with inherent differences in ulnar variance

PURPOSE: To assess load changes in the wrist and forearm resulting from surgically-induced radial shortening in wrists with inherent differences in ulnar variance. METHODS: Eleven fresh cadaver upper extremities, 4 with ulnar-plus variance of 2 mm or greater and 7 with ulnar-minus variance of 2 mm or greater were used. The radius and ulna of each specimen were instrumented with load cells, a 15-mm segment of the radius was resected and replaced with aluminum blocks of various sizes, and the specimens were loaded with 143 N (32 lb) at 1-mm differences of radial length. The load distribution between the radius and ulna was measured. RESULTS: The load distribution in the specimens with an ulnar-plus variance averaged 69% through the radius and 31% through the ulna. In the wrists with ulnar-minus variance, the load distribution averaged 94% through the radius and 6% through the ulna. The mean force in the ulna increased and the mean force in the radius decreased with incremental shortening of the distal end of the radius. The mean force through the ulna in the ulnar-plus-variance group was always higher than that of the ulnar-minus-variance group. When compared not by the number of millimeters of radial shortening but by the adjusted ulnar variance, there was no difference between the ulnar-plus-variance and the ulnar-minus-variance groups. CONCLUSIONS: Wrists with ulnar-minus variance could accommodate radial shortening without as much increase in the ulna load as wrists with ulnar-plus variance. The clinical relevance is that a patient with an ulnar-minus variance may accommodate more radial shortening after a wrist fracture without developing an ulnar impaction syndrome than a patient with an ulnar-plus-variant wrist.     

The results of ulnar shortening for ulnar impaction syndrome.

From the Centre tfr Hand Twenty-three wrists in 22 patients (mean age, 37 years) with ulnar impaction syndrome were treated by ulnar shortening. The mean ulnar shortening was 2 mm (range, 1-4 mm). At a mean follow-up time of 33 months, 17 patients had obtained good subjective pain relief and 16 were shown to have a good overall outcome using the Wrightington Hospital Wrist Function Evaluation.     

Ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar ideopathic impaction syndrome.

Twenty-eight patients were treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy for static or dynamic ulnar impaction syndrome. Ulnar variance was measured on a true anteroposterior radiograph. There were 25 wrists that were too long, two neutral, and one that was short. Bones were shortened by a mean of 3.5 mm. Mean follow-up time was 29 months (range 7-60), all with confirmed consolidation. At final follow-up mean grip strength had improved from 67% to 75%, mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score from 40 (range 12-83) to 26 (range 0-61) and mean range of movement from 80% (range 40%-100%) to 88% (range 50%-100%). Smoking, age at operation, type of osteotomy (transverse or oblique), dominance of hand, and sex did not influence consolidation or functionality. Special attention was paid to the anatomy of the distal radioulnar joint and the inclination of the sigmoid notch of the radius. There was no correlation between the anatomy and the functional outcome scores. Mean consolidation time (10 months) (range 2-32) and return to work were longer than in similar studies. Our findings confirm the usefulness of ulnar shortening osteotomy in the relief of ulnocarpal impingement symptoms.     

Carpal impaction with the ulnar styloid process: treatment with partial styloid resection

Carpal impaction with the ulnar styloid process (stylocarpal impaction) occurs less frequently than with the ulnar head (ulnocarpal impaction), and more commonly develops in wrists with negative ulnar variance. Physical examination, radiographic evaluation, and wrist arthroscopy are all helpful in excluding alternative causes of ulnar wrist pain. When an ulnocarpal stress test elicits pain, and radiographs suggest that this is due to carpal impaction with the ulnar styloid, partial resection of the styloid process provides successful treatment, so long as the insertion of the triangular fibrocartilage at the base of the styloid is not disrupted.     

Ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar ideopathic impaction syndrome

Twenty-eight patients were treated by ulnar shortening osteotomy for static or dynamic ulnar impaction syndrome. Ulnar variance was measured on a true anteroposterior radiograph. There were 25 wrists that were too long, two neutral, and one that was short. Bones were shortened by a mean of 3.5 mm. Mean follow-up time was 29 months (range 7–60), all with confirmed consolidation. At final follow-up mean grip strength had improved from 67% to 75%, mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score from 40 (range 12–83) to 26 (range 0–61) and mean range of movement from 80% (range 40%–100%) to 88% (range 50%–100%). Smoking, age at operation, type of osteotomy (transverse or oblique), dominance of hand, and sex did not influence consolidation or functionality. Special attention was paid to the anatomy of the distal radioulnar joint and the inclination of the sigmoid notch of the radius. There was no correlation between the anatomy and the functional outcome scores. Mean consolidation time (10 months) (range 2–32) and return to work were longer than in similar studies. Our findings confirm the usefulness of ulnar shortening osteotomy in the relief of ulnocarpal impingement symptoms.     

Editorial Commentary: Wrist Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: When I Use the Wafer Procedure and When I Do Not

Ulnar impaction syndrome is fundamentally a clinical diagnosis, which can be confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. All palmer stages are amenable to surgical treatment with either arthroscopic wafer procedure (AWP) or ulnar shortening osteotomy, and neither the absence of a triangular fibrocartilage complex perforation nor neutral or negative variance contraindicate either. Because of its minimally invasive value proposition and likely success, there are few clinical scenarios for which I do not perform AWP preferentially. Furthermore, AWP is always preferable in smokers and in wrists in which a divergent orientation of the sigmoid notch and ulnar articular surfaces portend arthritic complication after ulnar shortening.     

Oblique ulnar shortening osteotomy with a new plate and compression system

Ulnocarpal abutment or the ulnocarpal impaction syndrome occurs when excessive loads exist between the distal ulna and ulnar carpus. This overloading occurs as a result of the distal ulnar articular surface being more distal than the ulnar articular surface of the distal radius. This situation has been termed positive ulnar variance, and it can quickly lead to ulnar-sided wrist degenerative changes and functional losses. Patients often have vague, ulnar-sided complaints of chronic pain and swelling with an insidious onset that does not correlate with any specific traumatic event. Many procedures have been developed to alleviate this condition, but the gold standard for correcting positive ulnar variance is the ulnar shortening osteotomy. The goals of the shortening procedure are to relieve pain and prevent arthritis by reestablishing a neutral or slightly negative ulnar variance. We describe a new plate and compression system in which an oblique ulnar diaphyseal osteotomy is both completed and stabilized through the same jig-based system.     

Arthroscopic treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome

Ulnar impaction syndrome occurs in the setting of a central traumatic or degenerative defect in the triangular fibrocartilage complex in patients with ulnar positive variance. Chondral and subchondral edema, mechanical impingement of the articular disc, and chondromalacia of the distal ulna, proximal lunate, and proximal triquetrum produce symptoms with activity that do not improve with rest. Decreasing ulnocarpal load-sharing across the wrist with recession of the distal ulna is necessary to relieve symptoms in the majority of patients. Arthroscopic treatment with triangular fibrocartilage complex debridement and arthroscopic ulnar wafer resection is an effective treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome. It affords a single-stage, minimally invasive approach, with similar efficacy and fewer complications than open wafer resection or ulnar shortening osteotomy.     

Comparison of ulnar shortening osteotomy and the wafer resection procedure as treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome

A retrospective review was performed that compared the results of 2 different surgical treatments for ulnar impaction syndrome in 22 patients over a 6-year period. Ulnar shortening osteotomy and wafer distal ulna resection (wafer resection procedure) were each performed in 11 patients based on the preference of 3 individual hand surgeons. All patients presented with ulnar wrist pain and positive ulnar variance on either neutral rotation or pronated-grip x-rays and each failed conservative management. At a minimum follow-up time of 18 months, 9 patients had good to excellent results following ulnar shortening osteotomy compared with 8 following the wafer resection procedure. This difference was not statistically significant. All patients regained functional wrist motion and 21 of the 22 patients had satisfactory pain relief. There was 1 poor result in the wafer group that required revision to complete resection of the distal ulna. Five secondary procedures were required in the osteotomy group to remove painful hardware and union was delayed in 2 patients. Although ulnar shortening osteotomy provides effective treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome, the wafer resection procedure provides favorable pain relief and restoration of function but without the potential for nonunion or hardware removal. (J Hand Surg 2000; 25A:55-60.     

The ulnar impaction syndrome

The ulnar impaction syndrome can be defined as the impaction of the ulnar head against the triangular fibrocartilage complex and ulnar carpus resulting in progressive degeneration of those structures. The differential diagnosis in patients who present with ulnar wrist pain and limitation of motion can also include ulnar impingement syndrome and arthrosis or incongruity of the distal radioulnar joint. Structural abnormalities involving the distal radioulnar joint, distal radius, and ulnar carpus must be carefully elucidated prior to developing a treatment plan. When such abnormalities are identified and appropriately addressed, surgical treatment can be expected to be effective in the majority of cases. It is important to remember that in the absence of obvious structural abnormalities, the ulnar impaction syndrome may result from daily activities that result in excessive intermittent loading of the ulnar carpus. In this group of patients, treatment is directed at decreasing ulnar load by shortening the distal ulna in any of several ways. If relative instability of the ulnar ligamentous complex is a factor, then ulnar shortening by recession is the treatment of choice. Malunion of the distal radius resulting in ulnar impaction syndrome is best treated by addressing the deformity; that is, corrective radial osteotomy. Patients who present with a combination of ulnar impaction syndrome along with distal radioulnar joint, abnormalities must have both of these abnormalities addressed at the time of surgery. The matched ulnar resection and the hemiresection interposition arthroplasty are both effective procedures; however, the Suave-Kapandji procedure also can be used to address relative ligamentous laxity at the ulnar aspect of the wrist. The Darrach procedure is presently not recommended as a first-line treatment in these cases; however, when used as a salvage procedure, satisfactory results can be obtained in properly selected patients. Careful preoperative evaluation and planning are therefore the key to successful treatment of the ulnar impaction syndrome.     

Long-term outcome of radial shortening with or without ulnar shortening for treatment of Kienbock's disease: a 13-25 year follow-up

Fourteen of 35 patients who underwent radial shortening with or without ulnar shortening for the treatment of Kienbock's disease were followed up for a median of 19 (range, 13-25) years. Radial shortening was performed for patients with ulnar negative or neutral variance, and combined shortening of radius and ulna for those with ulnar positive variance. Overall the clinical situation was significantly improved at the final follow-up. There was no significant advanced collapse of the wrists and Lichtman's stage of disease increased in only three cases. Although osteoarthritic changes in the distal radio-ulnar joint progressed in five patients, this may have little influence on clinical outcome. Radial shortening osteotomy is a reliable method for treatment of Kienbock's disease.     

MSCT图像重建技术在尺骨撞击综合征中的应用

目的评价MSCT图像重建技术在尺骨撞击综合征诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析经腕关节镜检查证实的18例尺骨撞击综合征患者MSCT图像重建技术及标准后前位X线平片检查的影像资料,对尺骨变异、月骨及三角骨异常变化进行统计学分析。结果⑴MSCT图像重建技术及标准后前位X线平片检查测量出的尺骨变异差异无统计学意义(t=0.3562,P>0.05);⑵MSCT图像重建显示18例尺骨阳性变异15例,占总例数83.3%,其中阳性变异超过2 mm者11例,占总阳性变异的73.3%;中性及阴性变异3例,占总例数16.7%;⑶MSCT重建技术显示月骨和/或三角骨异常变化14例,占总例数77.8%,其中单纯月骨异常变化8例,月骨及三角骨同时异常变化5例,单纯三角骨异常变化1例。标准后前位X线平片能显示月骨和/或三角骨异常变化10例,占总例数55.6%,其中单纯月骨异常变化6例、月骨及三角骨同时异常变化4例,无单纯三角骨异常变化;⑷MSCT图像重建技术测量尺骨阳性伴月骨及三角骨异常变化14例,占总例数77.8%,尺骨阳性变异不伴月骨及三角骨异常变化1例,占总例数5.6%。阳性变异大于2 mm伴月骨及三角骨异常变化11例,占总例数61.1%,月骨及三角骨异常变化例数的78.6%。无尺骨中性及阴性变异伴月骨及三角骨异常变化。结论MSCT图像重建技术及后前位X线平片测量尺骨变异无统计学差异;尺骨撞击综合征发展过程中尺骨阳性变异呈易感因素;尺骨阳性变异大于2 mm时易引起月骨、三角骨异常变化;MSCT图像重建技术可以很好地显示尺骨变异及月骨、三角骨骨质硬化情况。     

Arthroscopic treatment of the ulnar impaction syndrome

The ulnar impaction syndrome is due to hyperpressure in the ulnocarpal joint. It occurs most frequently following distal radial fractures with shortening, but can also be secondary to a primitive length discrepancy between a short radius and a long ulna (positive ulnar variance). Symptoms and clinical findings, even though characteristic, are not specific. Standard X rays show a positive ulnar variance, and sometimes a hyperpressure cyst in the lunate. CT arthroscan and MRI studies demonstrate indirect signs of hyperpressure. If medical treatment fails to improve the condition, the choice surgical technique is arthroscopic, allowing debridement of the TFCC central tear, and shortening of the horizontal aspect of the ulnar head.     

Long-term Outcomes of Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy for Idiopathic Ulnar Impaction Syndrome: At Least 5-Years Follow-up

Background

There have been few outcomes studies with follow-up after performing ulnar shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome. We investigated the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of ulnar shortening osteotomy for the treatment of idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 36 patients who had undergone ulnar shortening osteotomy for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome for a mean follow-up of 79.1 months (range, 62 to 132 months). The modified Gartland and Werley scores were measured pre- and postoperatively. The radiographic parameters for the assessment of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) as well as the relationship between these radiographic parameters and the clinical and radiological outcomes were determined.

Results

The average modified Gartland and Werley wrist score improved from 65.5 ± 8.1 preoperatively to 93.4 ± 5.8 at the last follow-up visit. The average preoperative ulnar variance of 4.7 ± 2.0 mm was reduced to an average of -0.6 ± 1.4 mm postoperatively. Osteoarthritic changes of the DRUJ were first seen at 34.8 ± 11.1 months follow-up in 6 of 36 wrists (16.7%). Those who had osteoarthritic changes in the DRUJ had significantly wider preoperative ulnar variance, a longer distal radioulnar distance and a greater length of ulnar shortening, but the wrist scores of the patients who had osteoarthritic changes in the DRUJ were comparable to those who did not have osteoarthritic changes in the DRUJ.

Conclusions

The clinical outcomes are satisfactory for even more than 5 years after ulnar shortening osteotomy for treating idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome despite the osteoarthritic changes of the DRUJ. The patients who need a larger degree of ulnar shortening may develop DRUJ arthritis.     

Ulnar impaction syndrome

Although Palmer's classification of TFCC lesions differentiates post-traumatic central perforations (IA tears) from degenerative tears secondary to ulnocarpal impaction (IIC) [3], the distinction is not always clear clinically. In the final analysis, the literature suggests that as many as 25% of wrists with TFCC tears have residual symptoms following arthroscopic debridement alone [23], and it is likely that static or dynamic ul-nar positive variance plays a role [2,5,17,25]. The authors' results suggest that combined arthroscopic TFCC debridement and wafer resection are feasible and efficacious as treatment for all stages of ulnar impaction syndrome. When class II A and B changes are observed, that is, when a TFCC perforation has not yet developed, the authors have observed favorable results in most patients following arthroscopic TFCC central disc excision and wafer resection as an alternative to ulnar shortening osteotomy [33] or open wafer excision [10].     

Treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome with the wafer procedure

Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of wafer resection of the distal ulna (the wafer procedure) as treatment for ulnar impaction syndrome. Between 1995 and 1997, 26 patients were surgically treated for refractory wrist pain secondary to ulnar impaction syndrome. The diagnosis was based on physical examination, radiologic imaging, and wrist arthroscopy, and confirmatory pathoanatomy was identified at the time of surgery in all cases. The study population consisted of 18 women and 8 men, and patient age averaged 42 years. Follow-up averaged 27 months (range, 17-41 months). Twenty-three patients were completely satisfied with pain relief and the functional status of their wrists at final follow-up. Range of motion returned to baseline in the majority of cases, usually by 3 months, and grip strength increased an average of 11 kg (P < or = .005). The wafer procedure is an effective treatment alternative to ulnar-shortening osteotomy for ulnar impaction syndrome and avoids the risk of nonunion and hardware-related complications.     

The treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome: a systematic review of the literature

Ulnar impaction syndrome is a common cause of ulnar-sided wrist pain that is thought to be a result of abutment between the ulna and the ulnar carpus. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to determine the effectiveness of different treatment options in managing ulnar impaction syndrome. PubMed, the Cochrane database, and secondary references were reviewed to identify all English-language articles with reported results on the treatment of ulnar impaction syndrome. A total of 16 articles met the criteria for review. Three procedures were identified as the most commonly used in treating this syndrome: ulnar shortening osteotomy, the wafer procedure, and the arthroscopic wafer procedure. Mean time to union and percentage nonunion for the osteotomy group was 10.3 weeks and 1.7%, respectively. The overall complication rate for patients in the ulnar shortening osteotomy group, the wafer procedure group, and the arthroscopic wafer group was 30%, 8.8%, and 21%, respectively. The authors were unable to determine a single best treatment option based on the available studies, mainly due to the variability in the reporting of subjective outcome measures. Ulnar shortening osteotomy was associated with a higher complication rate than other procedures.     

尺骨撞击综合征的特点及早期诊断

目的探讨尺骨撞击综合征的特点及早期诊断方法并提出新的诊断标准。方法对1998年12月～2004年12月治疗的123例腕尺侧疼痛患者进行仔细检查,采用顾玉东等提出的诊断标准,特别结合腕部MRI检查,确诊尺骨撞击综合征48例。总结尺骨憧击综合征的X线及MRI影像学特点,分析腕部临床症状与Chun和Palmer评分及影像学表现的关系。结果本组33例患者存在尺骨阳性变异(68．8%),X线检查发现患者出现腕骨坏死比例为27．1%,其中以月骨坏死为主(64．7%)；MRI检查均发现腕骨不同程度信号改变,腕部骨坏死均位于月骨尺侧部分的近端和三角骨腰部及底部；患者腕部临床症状与Chun和Palmer评分及影像学表现关系密切。结论提高对尺骨撞击综合征的认识水平,以临床症状为基础,充分利用影像学检查,特别是MRI检查,可以明显提高该病征的早期诊断率。