超声引导下连续改良腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜阻滞对全髋关节置换术后镇痛效果的影响

目的观察超声引导下连续改良腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜阻滞在全髋关节置换术后的镇痛效果。方法择期全麻下行单侧全髋关节置换术患者60例,男33例,女27例,年龄60～86岁,体重44～82 kg,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级,采用随机数字表法将患者随机分为两组:超声引导下连续改良腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜阻滞组(E组)和静脉自控镇痛组(C组)。E组在全麻诱导前行改良腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜阻滞后留置导管,术后导管接电子泵行连续阻滞镇痛;C组术后使用PCIA。记录术后2、4、6、12、24、36、48 h静息和活动时VAS疼痛评分、曲马多补救镇痛情况、首次下床活动时间、术后镇痛满意度评分和不良反应的发生情况。结果术后1～48 h E组活动时VAS疼痛评分明显低于C组(P0.05),术后1～36 h E组静息时VAS疼痛评分明显低于C组(P0.05)。E组使用曲马多补救镇痛例数明显少于C组[4例(13%) vs 14例(47%),P0.05],首次下床活动时间明显短于C组[(24.2±1.8) h vs (39.7±1.7) h,P0.05],术后镇痛满意度评分明显高于C组[(9.0±0.6)分vs (6.1±0.8)分,P0.05],恶心呕吐发生率明显低于C组[3例(10%) vs 11例(37%),P0.05]。结论超声引导下连续改良腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜阻滞能提供良好的镇痛,促进患者早期功能锻炼和康复,可作为一种新型的镇痛方式应用于全髋关节置换术后患者的镇痛。     

超声引导下髂筋膜联合腰方肌阻滞用于髋关节置换术后镇痛的效果

目的观察超声引导下髂筋膜联合腰方肌阻滞用于髋关节置换术后镇痛的效果。方法选择2017年3—12月拟行择期髋关节置换术患者60例,男26例,女34例,年龄55～75岁,体重45～70 kg,ASAⅠ或Ⅱ级。采用随机数字表法将患者随机分为两组:髂筋膜组(N组)和髂筋膜联合腰方肌组(T组),每组30例。T组术后行超声引导下髂筋膜联合腰方肌阻滞,各注射0.375%罗哌卡因15 ml。N组术后行超声引导下髂筋膜阻滞,注射0.375%罗哌卡因30 ml。术后两组均采用PCIA至术后48 h。记录阻滞操作前(T_0)、术后3 h(T_1)、6 h(T_2)、12 h(T_3)、24 h(T_4)、36 h(T_5)、48 h(T_6)时静息状态VAS评分以及T_4—T_6时运动状态VAS评分;记录阻滞后0～4 h、4～8 h、8～12 h、12～24 h、24～36 h、36～48 h各时段PCIA有效按压次数;记录T_3—T_6时术侧髋关节最大屈曲和外展活动度;记录术后不良反应。结果 T组T_1—T_6时静息状态VAS评分和T_4—T_6时运动状态VAS评分明显低于N组(P0.01)。阻滞后48 h内各时段T组PCIA有效按压次数明显少于N组(P0.01)。T组髋关节最大屈曲和外展活动度明显大于N组(P0.01)。T组术后恶心呕吐和尿储留发生率明显低于N组(P0.05)。结论超声引导下髂筋膜联合腰方肌阻滞用于髋关节置换术后镇痛效果显著,镇痛作用确切,不良反应发生率低。     

髂筋膜间隙阻滞对前外侧小切口入路全髋置换术的影响

目的:比较单纯椎管内麻醉与联合髂筋膜间隙阻滞（fascia iliaca compartment block,FICB）对前外侧小切口（orthopädische chirurgie München,OCM）入路全髋关节置换术（total hip arthroplasty,THA）的影响分析。方法：2019年1月至2020年10月择期行单侧全髋关节置换术患者,分别采用椎管内麻醉复合超声引导下髂筋膜间隙阻滞（A组30例）和单纯椎管内麻醉（B组30例）。两组患者椎管内用药成分相同,术后采用相同静脉镇痛治疗方案。观察比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、臀中肌剥离程度、股骨大转子劈裂情况,术后髋关节疼痛视觉模拟评分（visual analogue scale,VAS）,术前及术后48 h 股四头肌及髋关节外展肌力,术后髋关节功能Harris评分。结果：所有患者获得随访,时间48~62（54.2±4.0）周。A组患者切口长度、手术时间及术中出血量明显低于B组（P<0.05）。A组术后24 h血红蛋白水平明显高于B组（P<0.05）。A组术后48 h髋关节外展肌力明显高于B组（P<0.05）。A组患者臀中肌剥离程度明显低于B组（P<0.05）。A组患者术后8、12、24 h VAS明显低于B组（P<0.05）;A组患者术后2、8周Harris评分明显高于B组（P<0.05）。结论：超声引导下髂筋膜间隙阻滞应用于侧卧位OCM入路THA,能明显缩短手术时间、减少术中出血量、减少术中臀中肌剥离情况等髋关节周围创伤及改善患者术后早期疼痛,有利于OCM入路临床操作及患者术后快速康复。     

Systematic review of the effects of fascia iliaca compartment block on hip fracture patients before operation

Background

Fascia iliaca compartment block is used for hip fractures in order to reduce pain, the need for systemic analgesia, and prevent delirium, on this basis. This systematic review was conducted to investigate the analgesic and adverse effects of fascia iliaca block on hip fracture in adults when applied before operation.

Plasma bupivacaine levels after fascia iliaca compartment block with and without adrenaline

Twenty children undergoing unilateral surgery on the thigh received a fascia iliaca compartment block using 2 mg·kg⁻¹ of bupivacaine with (Group A) or without (Group P) adrenaline 1/200 000. Venous blood samples were taken as 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50 and 60 min after injection and assayed for concentrations of bupivacaine. In all subjects an adequate block was produced. Plasma concentrations of bupivacaine in Group P were significantly higher than those in Group A ( P <0.05). The median maximum plasma concentration (C_max) was 1.1 μg·ml⁻¹ (range 0.54–1.29 μg·ml⁻¹) in Group P and 0.35 μg·ml⁻¹ (range 0.17–0.96 μg·ml⁻¹) in Group A. The median time taken to attain C_max (T_max) was 20 min (range 10–25 min) in Group P and 45 min (range 5–50 min) in Group A. The median time to first analgesia was 9.75 h (range 3–15 h) in Group P and 10.5 h (range 2.5–21 h) in Group A. The study confirmed the efficacy of the fascia iliaca compartment block in children and showed that when performed with 2 mg·kg⁻¹ of bupivacaine it is associated with plasma concentrations of bupivacaine well within acceptable limits. The addition of adrenaline 1/200 000 to the local anaesthetic solution reduces the maximum plasma concentration reached.     

超声引导下髂腰肌平面阻滞与髂筋膜间隙阻滞在髋关节置换围术期镇痛效果的比较

目的 比较超声引导下髂腰肌平面阻滞与髂筋膜间隙阻滞在髋关节置换围术期镇痛效果。方法 选择择期行单侧髋关节置换术患者50例,男28例,女22例,年龄18～95岁,BMI 17～35 kg/m²,ASAⅠ—Ⅲ级。采用随机数字表法将患者分为两组：髂腰肌平面阻滞组(Ⅰ组)和髂筋膜间隙阻滞组(S组),每组25例。Ⅰ组在髂股韧带和髂腰肌之间注射0.3%罗哌卡因10 ml, S组在腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜间隙注射0.3%罗哌卡因40 ml。术后采用舒芬太尼行患者自控静脉镇痛,VAS疼痛评分≥4分时,静脉注射氟比洛芬酯50 mg补救镇痛。记录神经阻滞操作时间、起效时间。记录术中丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼用量和舒芬太尼追加次数、术后2、6、8、12和24 h静息和活动(抬髋15°)时VAS疼痛评分、术后24 h镇痛泵有效按压次数和总按压次数、术后24 h舒芬太尼用量和补救镇痛情况。记录术后恶心呕吐、谵妄、感染、局麻药中毒和股四头肌无力发生情况。结果 与S组比较,Ⅰ组神经阻滞操作时间和起效时间明显缩短,术中舒芬太尼追加率、术后8 h活动时VAS疼痛评分、术后股四头肌无力发生率明显降低(P<0....     

超声引导下连续髂筋膜间隙阻滞用于老年髋部骨折患者围术期镇痛的研究

目的:研究超声引导下髂筋膜间隙阻滞对老年髋部骨折患者围手术期疼痛控制及术后并发症的影响。方法:选择2021年1月至2021年9月收治的老年髋部骨折手术患者127例,按照镇痛方法不同分为连续髂筋膜间隙阻滞组(F组)和静脉镇痛对照组(C组)。其中F组62例,男19例,女43例;年龄66~95(82.4±7.2)岁;股骨颈骨折25例,股骨转子间骨折37例。C组65例,男18例,女47例;年龄65~94(81.4±8.7)岁;股骨颈骨折29例,股骨转子间骨折36例。观察两组患者围术期不同时间点的疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、简易精神状态评价量表(minimental state examination,MMSE)评分、警觉-镇静评分(observer''s assessment of alertness/sedation,OAA/S)、改良Bromage评分、术后并发症及患者住院期间情况。结果:F组实施阻滞后30 min、麻醉摆放体位时,术后6、24、48 h的静息及运动VAS低于C组(P<0.05)。F组术前12 h,术后1、3 d的MMSE评分及术后3 d的OAA/S评分高于C组(P<0.05)。F组不良反应发生率、需要额外镇痛人数低于C组(P<0.05)。F组围术期镇痛满意度及住院时间均优于C组(P<0.05)。两组患者在各时间点患肢Bromage评分及术后30 d死亡率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:超声引导下连续髂筋膜间隙阻滞可为老年髋部骨折患者提供安全、有效的围术期镇痛效果,改善术后认知功能,减少术后并发症,从而缩短住院时间,提高住院期间生活质量。     

超声引导下髂筋膜腔隙阻滞对全髋关节置换术患者术后镇痛的效果

目的 评价超声引导下髂筋膜腔隙阻滞对全髋关节置换术患者术后镇痛的效果.方法 择期行全髋关节置换术患者36例,年龄54～82岁,体重48～72 kg,ASA分级Ⅰ～Ⅲ级,采用随机数字表法,将其随机分为2组(n=18):生理盐水组(NS组)和罗哌卡因组(R组).手术结束后30 min内行患侧超声引导下髂筋膜腔隙阻滞.R组髂筋膜腔隙注射0.25％罗哌卡因30 ml;NS组注射等容量生理盐水.阻滞完成后,采用0.01 mg/ml芬太尼行PCIA,无背景输注,PCA量2ml,锁定时间15 min.于阻滞前即刻(T0)、阻滞后3 h(T1)、6 h(T2)、8 h(T3)、12 h(T4)、24 h(T5)、48 h(T6)和72 h(T7)时,记录静态VAS评分;于T4、T5、T6和T7时,记录被动运动VAS评分;于T5、T6和T7时,记录主动运动VAS评分.记录阻滞后0～12h、12～24 h、24～48 h、48～ 72 h各时段内芬太尼用量.记录术后不良反应的发生情况.结果 与NS组比较,R组T1～T7时静态VAS评分、T4～T7时被动运动VAS评分和T5～T7时主动运动VAS评分均降低,各时段芬太尼用量减少(P＜0.05).两组不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 全髋关节置换术患者超声引导下髂筋膜腔隙阻滞的镇痛效果好,安全性良好.     

Ultrasound-guided genicular nerves block vs. local infiltration analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

Genicular nerves block is a promising technique to treat acute postoperative pain in total knee arthroplasty. Similar to surgeon-administered local infiltration analgesia, it targets sensory branches from the knee capsule, but through a selective ultrasound-guided injection that reduces local anaesthetic dose (150 ml ropivacaine 0.2% with local infiltration analgesia vs. 20 ml with genicular nerves block). This randomised non-inferiority trial compared the analgesic efficacy of genicular nerves block vs. local infiltration analgesia in the first 24 h following total knee arthroplasty. Sixty patients were randomly allocated to receive either ultrasound-guided block of five genicular nerves or local infiltration analgesia. The primary outcome was rest pain numeric rating scale (0–10) at 24 h. Secondary outcomes included pain numeric rating scale (rest and movement) and cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24 h. We analysed 29 patients in the genicular nerves block group and 30 in the local infiltration analgesia group. We found that the median difference (95%CI) in postoperative rest pain at 24 h (non-inferiority criteria, Δ = 1) was −1.0 (−2.0 to 1.0, p < 0.001). Median difference in cumulative opioid consumption was 0.0 mg (−3.0–5.0, p < 0.001) meeting the non-inferiority criteria, Δ = 23 mg. We conclude that genicular nerves block of five nerves provides non-inferior analgesia in the first 24 h following surgery compared with local infiltration analgesia, but with a considerable reduction in the local anaesthetic dose.     

UIFB联合羟考酮PCIA在髋部骨折手术加速康复中的效果评价

目的:评价超声引导下髂筋膜阻滞（ultrasound-guided iliac fascia block, UIFB）联合羟考酮患者自控静脉镇痛（patient-controlled intravenous analgesia, PCIA）在髋部骨折患者术后康复中的效果。方法:选取蛛网膜下腔阻滞麻醉下行髋部骨折内固定术...     

超声引导下髂筋膜间隙阻滞在老年患者全髋关节置换术中的应用

目的 探讨术前行超声引导下髂筋膜间隙阻滞在老年患者全髋关节置换术中的应用效果。
方法 回顾性分析择期在全身麻醉下行全髋关节置换术的老年患者98例,男40例,女58例,年龄≥65岁,BMI 16～28 kg/m²,ASA Ⅱ或Ⅲ级。根据术前是否行髂筋膜间隙阻滞分为两组：髂筋膜间隙阻滞组（F组,n=43）和对照组（C组,n=55）。根据性别、年龄、BMI、ASA分级、基础疾病、手术方式进行倾向评分匹配。收集手术时间、麻醉时间、术中出血量、术中舒芬太尼和瑞芬太尼用量、术后2、6、12、24、48 h静息和活动时NRS评分、首次下床活动时间、住院时间、术后48 h镇痛满意度评分、术后48 h内患者自控静脉镇痛（PCIA）有效按压次数以及术后48 h内PCIA舒芬太尼用量。记录术后输血、入ICU以及相关不良反应（包括肺部感染、尿路感染、心律失常、术后恶心呕吐、尿潴留、瘙痒、呼吸抑制、嗜睡）的发生情况。
结果 匹配后F组和C组各纳入患者43例。F组术中舒芬太尼和瑞芬太尼用量明显少于C组（P＜0.05）。F组术后2、6 h静息时NRS评分以及术后2、6、12、24、48 h活动时NRS评分明显低于C组（P＜0.05）。F组首次下床活动时间、住院时间明显短于C组（P＜0.05）,F组术后48 h镇痛满意度评分明显高于C组（P＜0.05）,F组术后48 h内PCIA有效按压次数以及PCIA舒芬太尼用量明显少于C组（P＜0.05）。F组术后恶心呕吐及尿潴留的发生率明显低于C组（P＜0.05）。两组手术时间、麻醉时间、术中出血量、术后12、24、48 h静息时NRS评分、术后输血、入ICU以及肺部感染、尿路感染、心律失常、术后瘙痒、嗜睡发生率差异均无统计学意义。
结论 术前行超声引导下髂筋膜间隙阻滞能为老年患者全髋关节置换术后提供良好镇痛,减少镇痛药物的使用,提高镇痛满意度,同时促进患者术后早期恢复。     

连续髋关节囊周围神经阻滞与连续髂筋膜间隙阻滞对老年全髋关节置换术患者围术期镇痛效果影响的比较

目的 比较连续髋关节囊周围神经阻滞(PENGB)和连续髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)在老年全髋关节置换术患者围术期的镇痛效果。方法 选择行全髋关节置换术的老年患者50例,男22例,女28例,年龄65～85岁,BMI 18～30 kg/m²,ASAⅡ或Ⅲ级。采用随机数字表法将患者分为两组：连续PENGB组(P组)和连续FICB组(F组),每组25例。P组在全麻诱导前实施超声引导下连续PENGB,给予0.375%罗哌卡因20 ml。F组在全麻诱导前实施超声引导下连续FICB,给予0.375%罗哌卡因30 ml。两组患者术毕行神经阻滞自控镇痛。记录阻滞前即刻、术后3、6、12、24和48 h静息和活动(被动直腿抬高45°)时VAS疼痛评分,神经阻滞操作时间、丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼用量,术后12、24和48 h下肢运动阻滞改良Bromage评分,术后补救镇痛情况、术前等待时间和术后住院时间,恶心呕吐、局麻药中毒、神经损伤、导管移位和脱出、血肿、穿刺部位感染等情况。结果 与阻滞前即刻比较,术后3、6、12、24和48 h两组静息和活动时VAS疼痛评分明显降低(P<0.05)。与...     

超声引导罗哌卡因复合地塞米松髂筋膜间隙阻滞应用于全膝关节置换术围术期的镇痛效果

目的 探讨超声引导罗哌卡因复合地塞米松髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)在全膝关节置换术(TKA)围术期的镇痛效果.方法 将行TKA治疗的48例患者根据随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组,每组24例.两组术前0.5 h均在超声引导下行FICB,观察组注入0.375％罗哌卡因30 ml+地塞米松10 mg,对照组注入0.375％罗哌...     

超声引导下髂筋膜间隙联合骶丛神经阻滞在老年全髋关节置换术中的应用

目的评价超声引导下髂筋膜间隙联合骶丛神经阻滞在老年全髋关节置换后外侧入路手术中的应用效果。方法选择择期行单侧人工全髋关节置换术(后外侧入路)患者60例,男24例,女36例,年龄65~90岁,ASAⅡ或Ⅲ级,随机分为研究组(NB组)和对照组(SA组),每组30例。NB组在超声引导下先行髂筋膜间隙阻滞(0.4%罗哌卡因50ml),然后行骶丛神经阻滞(0.5%罗哌卡因20ml);SA组行轻比重单侧腰麻2.0~2.5ml(0.5%布比卡因2ml+灭菌注射用水1ml)。记录两组的感觉、运动阻滞起效及完善时间。记录患者入室时(T_0)、摆放体位前1min(T_1)、摆体位时(T_2)、手术切皮时(T_3)、手术开始后30min(T_4)、手术结束时(T_5)、术后24h(T_6)的VAS评分。记录两组患者术中辅助使用多巴胺、阿托品的情况及并发症的发生情况。结果 NB组感觉、运动阻滞起效及完善时间明显长于SA组(P0.05)。T_1、T_2、T_6时NB组VAS评分明显低于SA组,T_3、T_5时NB组VAS评分明显高于SA组(P0.05)。NB组使用多巴胺2例(6.7%),明显少于SA组的8例(26.7%)(P0.05)。NB组头痛、恶心、呕吐、尿潴留发生率明显低于SA组(P0.05)。结论超声引导下髂筋膜间隙联合骶丛神经阻滞应用于老年全髋关节置换后外侧入路手术,可减轻摆放体位所致的疼痛,减少血管活性药物的用量,且术后早期镇痛效果好,不良反应较少。     

A randomised,controlled, double‐blind trial of ultrasound‐guided phrenic nerve block to prevent shoulder pain after thoracic surgery

Moderate to severe ipsilateral shoulder pain is a common complaint following thoracic surgery. In this prospective, parallel‐group study at Odense University Hospital, 76 patients (aged > 18 years) scheduled for lobectomy or pneumonectomy were randomised 1:1 using a computer‐generated list to receive an ultrasound‐guided supraclavicular phrenic nerve block with 10 ml ropivacaine or 10 ml saline (placebo) immediately following surgery. A nerve catheter was subsequently inserted and treatment continued for 3 days. The study drug was pharmaceutically pre‐packed in sequentially numbered identical vials assuring that all participants, healthcare providers and data collectors were blinded. The primary outcome was the incidence of unilateral shoulder pain within the first 6 h after surgery. Pain was evaluated using a numeric rating scale. Nine of 38 patients in the ropivacaine group and 26 of 38 patients in the placebo group experienced shoulder pain during the first 6 h after surgery (absolute risk reduction 44% (95% CI 22–67%), relative risk reduction 65% (95% CI 41–80%); p = 0.00009). No major complications, including respiratory compromise or nerve injury, were observed. We conclude that ultrasound‐guided supraclavicular phrenic nerve block is an effective technique for reducing the incidence of ipsilateral shoulder pain after thoracic surgery.     

腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜阻滞联合经静脉患者自控镇痛在老年髋关节置换术后的应用

目的：比较经静脉患者自控镇痛(patient controlled intravenous analgesia,PCIA)与腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜阻滞联合PCIA在老年髋关节置换术后的应用效果。方法：2019年6月至2021年6月84例老年患者接受髋关节置换术,其中42例以PCIA镇痛作为对照组,男18例,女24例;年龄60~78(70.43±3.67)岁;股骨颈骨折28例,股骨头坏死14例;另42例以腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜阻滞联合PCIA镇痛作为研究组,男20例,女22例;年龄61~76(69.68±3.74)岁;股骨颈骨折25例,股骨头坏死17例。分别于术后2、6、12、24、48 h进行疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)及Ramesay镇静评分。观察比较两组术后48 h的舒芬太尼总消耗量、PCIA总按压次数、术后首次下地时间、住院时间、不良反应发生率、镇痛满意度等随访结果。结果：两组术后随访9~24(13.85±2.67)个月。两组手术时间和术中出血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。两组术后2 h的VAS比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),研究组术后6、12、24、48 h的VAS均低于对照组(P＜0.05)。研究组术后2、6、12 h的Ramesay镇静评分均高于对照组(P＜0.05),两组术后24、48 h的Ramesay评分比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。研究组术后48 h内舒芬太尼消耗量、PICA按压次数少于对照组(P＜0.05),术后首次下地时间早于对照组(P＜0.05)。研究组镇痛满意度高于对照组(P＜0.05)。两组住院时间、不良反应发生率、随访期间并发症比较差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。结论：腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜阻滞联合PCIA在老年髋关节置换术后镇痛和镇静效果显著,可减少舒芬太尼使用量及PCIA总按压次数,有利于患者早期下床活动,提高镇痛满意度。     

不同方式超声引导连续髂筋膜阻滞在髋关节置换术后镇痛效果

目的 对两种不同方式超声引导连续髂筋膜间隙阻滞在髋关节置换术后镇痛效果进行评价。方法 采用前瞻性随机对照研究,纳入新疆医科大学第六附属医院于2016年3月至2017年10月收治的腰-硬联合阻滞麻醉下人工全髋关节置换术（total hip arthroplasty, THA）术后病人60例,男29例,女31例,年龄为65~83岁,平均（66.78±9.32）岁。按照数字随机法分为：①腹股沟韧带上髂筋膜阻滞组（上髂筋膜组）30例,男17例,女13例,年龄为65~84岁,平均（66.13±9.16）岁;②腹股沟韧带下髂筋膜阻滞组（下髂筋膜组）30例,男12例,女18例,年龄为65~82岁,平均（65.80±8.13）岁。在超声引导下行髂筋膜连续神经阻滞后镇痛,设置两组镇痛泵的局部麻醉药物均为0.2%的罗哌卡因200 ml,负荷量20 ml,置管成功后注入,背景量为0。病人自控镇痛（patient controlled analgesia, PCA）10 ml/次,锁定时间为1 h。对病人的静息疼痛、持续性被动疼痛和主观性疼痛等疼痛视觉模拟量表（visual analogue scale, VAS）评分进行记录,对病人的阻滞效果、曲马多用量以及病人满意度进行评价。结果 上髂筋膜组的手术时间为（70.4±12.1） min,下髂筋膜组为（70.8±10.3） min,两组比较差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。在静息状态、主被动VAS评分方面,上髂筋膜组均优于下髂筋膜组;上髂筋膜组病人阻滞后各时间点股外侧皮神经支配区的感觉阻滞程度和曲马多使用量优于下髂筋膜组,以上指标比较,两组差异均有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）。两组病人阻滞后各时间点股神经阻滞率和术后镇痛满意度比较,差异均无统计学意义（均P＞0.05）。结论 THA术后采用超声引导下浓度为0.2%罗哌卡因,在THA术后镇痛效果上,腹股沟韧带上连续髂筋膜阻滞明显优于腹股沟韧带下连续髂筋膜神经阻滞。     

The analgesic efficacy of continuous fascia iliaca block vs. continuous psoas compartment block after hip surgery: A comparative study

BackgroundBoth psoas compartment block and fascia iliaca compartment block have been shown to be reliable blocks for postoperative pain relief for procedures involving the hip joint. This study evaluated the efficacy of continuous psoas compartment block with continuous fascia iliaca block for postoperative analgesia after hip surgery.MethodsIn randomized blinded study Forty, ASA I–III patients aged 30–75 years, with BMI less than 40, scheduled for hip surgery, were divided to one of two groups. Group P: continuous psoas compartment block (n = 18) and group F: continuous fascia iliaca block (n = 19). Standard general anesthesia was induced after finishing the block technique. After recovery 30 ml of 0.125% levobupivacaine was injected through the catheter to all patients. Postoperative 24 h meperidine consumption, patient satisfaction, visual analogue scale pain scores at (1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h) postoperative, postoperative hemodynamics (HR and MAp), evidence of sensory and motor blockades, and incidence of adverse effects were recorded.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the two groups in 24 h postoperative meperidine requirements, postoperative VAS, patient satisfaction, postoperative hemodynamics, and distribution of sensory and motor block of (femoral, lateral femoral cutaneous, and obturator nerves). The epidural anesthesia occurred in two patients in psoas group (11%).ConclusionBoth continuous fascia iliaca block and continuous psoas compartment block were comparable in providing safe and effective analgesia after hip surgery.     

Comparison of the postoperative analgesic efficacies of intravenous acetaminophen and fascia iliaca compartment block in hip fracture surgery: A randomised controlled trial

BackgroundManaging pain during movement after hip fracture surgery is important for achieving earlier hip mobilisation and for preventing postoperative complications. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that the fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) would improve postoperative pain on movement compared with intravenous acetaminophen.MethodsIn this prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel trial, patients were assigned to either the intravenous acetaminophen or the ultrasound-guided FICB group. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were evaluated at 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 h, 2 days, and 7 days postoperatively. The primary outcome was VAS scores on movement at 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were VAS scores on movement at the other time points, VAS scores at rest, the total number of rescue analgesics required and incidence of delirium during the first 24 h postoperatively, potential drug or block-related complications, and the time to first standing.ResultsVAS scores on movement at 24 h after surgery were significantly lower in the FICB group than in the intravenous acetaminophen group [median (the 25th to 75th percentiles), 20 (10–30) vs 40 (30–53); P < 0.01]. The VAS scores on movement at any other time point and the scores at rest at 12 h after surgery were also significantly lower in the FICB group than in the intravenous acetaminophen group. The two groups did not differ in terms of the total number of rescue analgesics required or the incidence of delirium during the first 24 h postoperatively; complications; or the time to first standing.ConclusionsFICB improved postoperative pain on movement compared with intravenous acetaminophen without increasing the complication rate. However, the total number of rescue analgesics required and the time to first standing were not significantly different between the two groups.