Differentiating atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from tachycardia via concealed accessory pathway

Studies analyzing the diagnostic value of 12-lead electrocardiographic criteria differentiating slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) due to concealed accessory pathway have shown inconsistent results. In 97 patients (50 with AVNRT, 47 with AVRT) 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) were recorded during sinus rhythm and tachycardia (QRS <120 ms). The ECGs were blinded for diagnosis and patient and analyzed independently by 2 electrophysiologists. The studied criteria differentiating AVNRT from AVRT included pseudo-r'/S, the presence of a retrograde P wave, RP interval, ST-segment depression >/=2 mm with the number and location of the affected leads, QRS amplitude, and cycle length alternans.     

Differentiating atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia by DeltaHA values during entrainment from the ventricle

BACKGROUND: Differentiating atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from orthodromic atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) can be difficult. The His bundle and atria are activated sequentially over the AV node during entrainment of AVNRT from the ventricle but simultaneously during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). They are activated in parallel during entrainment of AVRT but sequentially during SVT. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a DeltaHA (HA((entrainment)) - HA((SVT))) cutoff value of 0 reliably differentiates AVNRT from AVRT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 61 patients undergoing electrophysiologic evaluation for paroxysmal SVT, retrograde His-bundle potentials were recorded in 57 (93%) and entrainment performed in 49 (34 AVNRT, 15 AVRT). DeltaHA values during entrainment from the ventricle were significantly longer during AVNRT than AVRT (31 +/- 24 ms vs -38 +/- 31 ms, P <.001). All DeltaHA values were positive (minimum: 3 ms) for AVNRT and negative (maximum: -2 ms) for AVRT. DeltaHA of 0 had sensitivity, specificity. and positive predictive value of 100% for correct diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The DeltaHA criterion during entrainment of tachycardia from the ventricle reliably differentiates AVNRT (positive values) from AVRT (negative values).     

Usefulness of ST-segment elevation in lead aVR during tachycardia for determining the mechanism of narrow QRS complex tachycardia

In the present study, we analyzed ST-segment elevation in lead aVR during tachycardia to differentiate the narrow QRS complex tachycardia. A total of 338 12-lead electrocardiograms during narrow QRS complex tachycardia were analyzed. Each patient underwent a complete electrophysiologic study. There were 161 episodes of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), 165 episodes of atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT), and 12 episodes of atrial tachycardia (AT). The prevalence of aVR ST-segment elevation was 71% for AVRT, 31% for AVNRT, and 16% for AT. For ST-T changes in different leads, logistic regression analysis showed aVR ST-segment elevation was the only significant factor to differentiate the types of narrow QRS complex tachycardia (p <0.001 for AVRT and AVNRT; P = 0.02 for AVRT and AT). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of aVR ST-segment elevation to differentiate AVRT from AVNRT and AT were 71%, 70%, and 70%, respectively. Among 117 episodes of AVRT with aVR ST-segment elevation, there were 76 (65%) left side, 23 (20%) right side, 14 (12%) posterior septal, and 4 (3%) antero- and mid-septal accessory pathways (p = 0.002). In conclusion, aVR ST-segment elevation during narrow QRS complex tachycardia favors the atrioventricular reentry through an accessory pathway as the mechanism of the tachycardia.     

aVR导联ST段抬高对阵发性室上性心动过速的鉴别价值

目的探讨aVR导联ST段抬高及其持续时间对阵发性室上性心动过速(PSVT)的鉴别价值。方法126例行射频消融治疗成功的PSVT患者,其中房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)65例,房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)61例。分析其aVR导联ST段抬高幅度及持续时间。结果65例AVRT中aVR导联ST抬高且持续时间≥0.08s有46例,61例AVNRT中有13例,诊断AVRT的敏感性、特异性及阳性预测值分别为70.8%,78.7%,78.0%;46例aVR导联ST段抬高的AVRT中左侧旁道占38例,诊断左侧旁道的敏感性、特异性及阳性预测值分别为79.2%,52.9%,82.6%。结论aVR导联ST段抬高及其持续时间有助于鉴别阵发性室上性心动过速,且其多发生于左侧旁道。     

A New Electrocardiographic Algorithm Using Retrograde P Waves for Differentiating Atrioventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia From Atrioventricular Reciprocating Tachycardia Mediated by Concealed Accessory Pathway

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to use an electrocardiographic (ECG) algorithm, derived from the results of radiofrequency ablation, to discriminate atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT) and to localize a concealed accessory pathway, prospectively.Background. Information about ECG criteria for differentiating AVNRT from AVRT is limited and has not been confirmed by surgical or catheter ablation.Methods. Four hundred six ECGs (obtained from 406 different patients) that demonstrated narrow QRS complex (<0.12 s) supraventricular tachycardia with an RP′ interval less than the P′R interval or pseudo r′ wave in lead V₁or pseudo S wave in inferior leads, or both, were examined, and the results were confirmed by radiofrequency catheter ablation. The initial 226 ECGs were analyzed to develop a stepwise algorithm, and the subsequent 180 ECGs were prospectively evaluated by the new algorithm.Results. The presence of a pseudo r′ wave in lead V₁or a pseudo S wave in leads II, III, aVF indicated anterior-type AVNRT with an accuracy of 100%. With the difference of RP′ intervals in leads V₁and III >20 ms, posterior-type AVNRT could be differentiated from AVRT utilizing a posteroseptal pathway with a sensitivity of 71% (95% confidence interval [CI] 55% to 89%), a specificity of 87% (95% CI 67% to 97%) and a positive predictive value of 75% (95% CI 56% to 91%). According to the polarity of retrograde P waves in leads V₁, II, III, aVF and I during AVRT, the concealed accessory pathway could be localized to one of the nine regions on the atrioventricular annuli with an accuracy of 75% (for a right midseptal pathway) to 93.8% (for a left posterior pathway). Overall, the new algorithm had an accuracy of 97.8% in discriminating AVNRT from AVRT and 88.1% in localizing a concealed accessory pathway, prospectively. Prediction was incorrect in only 15 patients (9.1%).Conclusions. The new ECG algorithm derived from the analysis of retrograde P waves during tachycardia could provide a criterion for differential diagnosis between AVNRT and AVRT and for predicting the location of concealed accessory pathways.(J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:394–402)     

Differentiation of Narrow QRS Complex Tachycardia Types Using the 12‐Lead Electrocardiogram

Background: Previous studies have shown that only 80% of narrow QRS supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) types can be differentiated by standard 12‐lead electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria. This study was designed to determine the value of some new ECG criteria in differentiating narrow QRS SVT. Methods and Results : 120 ECGs demonstrating paroxysmal narrow QRS complex tachycardia (QRS s 0.11 ms and rate > 120 beats/min) were analyzed. Forty atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT), 70 atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), and 10 atrial tachycardia defined with electrophysiologic study (EPS) consisted the study group. Eight surface ECG criteria were found to be significantly different between tachycardia types by univariate analysis. P waves separate from the QRS complex were observed more frequently in AVRT (70%) and atrial tachycardia (80%). Pseudo r’deflection in lead V¹, pseudo S wave in inferior leads, and cycle length alternans were more common in AVNRT (55, 20, and 6%, respectively). QRS alternans was also present during AVRT (28%). ST‐segment depression (≧ 2 mm) or T‐wave inversion, or both, were present more often in AVRT (60%) than in AVNRT (27%). During sinus rhythm, manifest preexcitation was observed more often in patients with AVRT (42%). When a P wave was present, RP/PR interval ratio > 1 was more common in atrial tachycardia (90%). By multivariate analysis, presence of a P wave separate from the QRS complex, pseudo r’deflection in lead V¹, QRS alternans, preexcitation during sinus rhythm, ST‐segment depression > 2 mm or T‐wave inversion, or both, were independent predictors of tachycardia type. Conclusions: Several new ECG criteria may be useful in differentiation of SVT types. Prediction of mechanism prior to EPS may provide additional benefits concerning the fluoroscopic exposure time and cardiac catheterization procedure. A.N.E. 2002;7(2):120–126     

A new criterion to differentiate atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia from atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia: Combined AVR criterion

Aim

A combined aVR criterion is described as the presence of a pseudo r′ wave in aVR during tachycardia in patients without r′ wave in aVR in sinus rhythm and/or a ≥50% increase in r′ wave amplitude compared to sinus rhythm in patients with r′ wave in the basal aVR lead. We aimed to investigate the use of combined aVR criterion in differential diagnosis of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT).

希氏束旁起搏鉴别间隔部隐匿性AVRT与AVNRT的临床价值

目的：探讨希氏束旁起搏鉴别间隔部隐匿性房室旁道与慢一快型房室结折返性心动过速（AVNRT）的临床价值。方法：采用希氏束逆传不应期心室早搏刺激法将61例患者分别诊断为37例慢一快AVNRT和24例间隔部房室折返性心动过速（AVRT）；再对61例患者采用希氏束旁起搏方法进一步检测。结果：采用希氏束旁起搏法检测37例AVNRT患者中有6例未检测成功，其余31例均为逆传房室结图形；24例AVRT患者中4例未检测成功，15例呈逆传旁道／旁道图形，5例呈非逆传旁道／旁道图形。如以逆传旁道／旁道图形为标准，鉴别间隔快旁路引起的AVRT与慢一快型房室结折返性心动过速，敏感性75％，特异性可达1009／6。结论：希氏束旁刺激法对鉴别诊断AVRT与AVNRT有较高的特异性。     

体表心电图对阵发性窄QRS波心动过速鉴别诊断及定位的价值

目的:通过分析152例阵发性窄QRS波心动过速（NQRST）患者体表心电图（ECG）的6种指标,探讨ECG对NQRST鉴别诊断及定位的价值。方法:选取152例NQRST患者,其中94例为房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT),42例为房室折返性心动过速（AVRT),16例为房性心动过速(AT)。上述患者电生理机制均经腔内电生理检查所证实,对比分析每位患者窦性心律及心动过速发作时体表心电图在心率、ST-T改变、QRS波电交替、R-P′/P′-R相似文献   

食管电生理诊断室上性心动过速及其分型的意义

目的探讨食管电生理对室上性心动过速(SVT)诊断及分型的准确性。方法收集近两年经射频消融治疗的SVT病例,选择其中食管电生理和心内电生理资料完整的41例,将两种电生理检查对SVT诊断及分型比较,进行χ2检验,以P<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果两种电生理检查诊断房室结双径路(DAVNP)、慢快型房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)、常见的顺向型房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)差异无统计学意义;食管电生理对房室旁路(AP)的粗略定位准确性较高,但对快慢型AVNRT、慢AP参于的AVRT与房性心动过速不易辨别。结论食管电生理虽不易辨别少见型SVT,但诊断常见型SVT及分型准确性方面与心内电生理有相似的价值,且具有无创、简便、费用低等优点。     

房室折返和房室结折返性心动过速患者的个性分析

目的探讨房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)和房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)患者的个性特征。方法采用龚耀先修订的艾森克个性问卷量表,对83例AVRT、105例AVNRT患者射频消融前后和50例对照组正常人的精神质(P)、内外向(E)、情绪稳定性(N)和掩饰倾向(L)值进行测量。结果射频消融前后,各组之间的P、E、N和L值相比较差异无显著性(P>0.05);射频消融前后AVNRT组内女性患者的N分值较男性高(分别为12.93±2.83vs9.88±2.61;12.84±2.87vs9.87±2.64;P均<0.05)。结论AVNRT女性患者具有神经质倾向,这可能是在AVNRT中女性占多数的原因之一。     

食管心房调搏诊断室上性心动过速的临床研究

为探讨食管心房调搏揭示室上性心动过速发生机制的价值和局限性,回顾性分析成功射频导管消融的１３８例隐匿性单房室旁道参与的顺向型房室折返性心动过速和１００例单一类型房室结折返性心动过速的食管心房调搏结果。结果显示：前１３８例中,３例前间隔旁道引起者食管心房调搏均诊断为房室结折返性心动过速余为左右侧其它部位的旁道,诊断正确。后１００例中,５例为慢－慢型,２例为快－慢型,食管心房调搏均诊断为房室折返性心动     

ST-T改变在鉴别窄QRS波心动过速中的价值

为评价ST T改变在鉴别窄QRS波心动过速中的价值 ,用SPSS分析 12 4例窄QRS波心动过速患者体表 12导联心电图的ST T改变 ,其中房室折返性心动过速 (AVRT) 72例 ,房室结折返性心动过速 (AVNRT) 5 2例。结果 :AVRT组Ⅰ aVL导联ST段压低幅度 (0 .10± 0 .0 7mV)大于AVNRT组 (0 .0 6± 0 .0 6mV) ,P =0 .0 0 2 ;AVRT组V1导联T波幅度 (0 .14± 0 .19mV)大于AVNRT组 (0 .0 1± 0 .13mV) ,P <0 .0 0 1。鉴别窄QRS波心动过速的预测指标为QRS波终末改变 (R2 =0 .6 0 4 ,P <0 .0 0 1)、V1导联T波方向 (R2 =0 .2 4 9,P <0 .0 0 1)、V1导联T波幅度 (R2 =0 .180 ,P <0 .0 0 1)、Ⅰ aVL导联ST段压低 (R2 =0 .0 4 3,P <0 .0 0 1)。QRS波终末改变阳性预测AVNRT的特异性 98.6 % ,敏感性 75 .0 % ;V1导联T波正向预测AVRT的特异性 6 7.3% ,敏感性 81.9%。结论 :ST T改变有助于鉴别窄QRS波心动过速。QRS波终末改变是鉴别窄QRS波心动过速的较强预测指标 ;V1导联T波方向与幅度、Ⅰ aVL导联ST段压低是鉴别窄QRS波心动过速的较弱预测指标。     

Validation of Standard and New Criteria for the Differential Diagnosis of Narrow QRS Tachycardia in Children and Adolescents

To establish an appropriate treatment strategy and determine if ablation is indicated for patients with narrow QRS complex supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), analysis of a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is required, which can differentiate between the 2 most common mechanisms underlying SVT: atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and orthodromic atrioventricular reentry tachycardia (OAVRT). Recently, new, highly accurate electrocardiographic criteria for the differential diagnosis of SVT in adults were proposed; however, those criteria have not yet been validated in a pediatric population.All ECGs were recorded during invasive electrophysiology study of pediatric patients (n = 212; age: 13.2 ± 3.5, range: 1–18; girls: 48%). We assessed the diagnostic value of the 2 new and 7 standard criteria for differentiating AVNRT from OAVRT in a pediatric population.Two of the standard criteria were found significantly more often in ECGs from the OAVRT group than from the AVNRT group (retrograde P waves [63% vs 11%, P < 0.001] and ST-segment depression in the II, III, aVF, V1–V6 leads [42% vs 27%; P < 0.05]), whereas 1 standard criterion was found significantly more often in ECGs from the AVNRT group than from the OAVRT group (pseudo r′ wave in V1 lead [39% vs 10%, P < 0.001]). The remaining 6 criteria did not reach statistical significance for differentiating SVT, and the accuracy of prediction did not exceed 70%. Based on these results, a multivariable decision rule to evaluate differential diagnosis of SVT was performed.These results indicate that both the standard and new electrocardiographic criteria for discriminating between AVNRT and OAVRT have lower diagnostic values in children and adolescents than in adults. A decision model based on 5 simple clinical and ECG parameters may predict a final diagnosis with better accuracy.     

Paroxysmal regular supraventricular tachycardia: the diagnostic accuracy of the transesophageal ventriculo-atrial interval

Objective: To establish the diagnostic accuracy of the transesophageal ventriculo‐atrial (VA) interval in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) and normal baseline electrocardiogram (ECG). Methods: The transesophageal VA interval during tachycardia was recorded in 318 patients (age 45 ± 17 years, 58% female) with PSVT and a normal surface ECG between attacks. Subsequently, all patients underwent an ablation procedure establishing the correct tachycardia diagnosis. Results: AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), AV reentrant tachycardia through a concealed accessory pathway (AVRT), and ectopic atrial tachycardia (EAT) were found in 213, 95, and 10 cases, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified an optimal cutoff for a binary categorization of AVNRT versus AVRT/EAT at ≤80 ms (area under the curve 0.891). Owing to a biphasic distribution, AVNRT was very likely at VA intervals ≤90 ms with a sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV) of 87%, 91%, and 95%. In the range 91–160 ms the corresponding values for AVRT were 88%, 95%, and 88% (90%, 99%, and 98% in male patients). In the small group with VA intervals >160 ms (n = 29), the diagnosis was less clear (PPV of 67% for AVNRT). Conclusions: In patients with sudden onset regular tachycardia and a normal ECG during sinus rhythm, a transesophageal VA interval of ≤80 ms has the highest diagnostic accuracy to diagnose AVNRT versus AVRT/EAT. Overall, the biphasic distribution of VA intervals suggests considering AVNRT at 90 ms and below and AVRT between 91 and 160 ms (in particular in male patients) while the diagnosis is vague at VA intervals above 160 ms. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2011;16(4):327–335     

Atrial components contributing to pseudo r' deflection in lead V1 in slow/fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: analysis of the atrial activation sequence by basket catheter isochronal mapping.

Electrocardiographic recognition of the P' wave during tachycardia is very useful in the diagnosis of supraventricular tachycardias. In slow/fast (S/F) atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), no discrete P' waves are observed on ECG and pseudo r' deflection in lead V1 (pseudo r') is commonly recognized. However, the atrial components that contribute to the genesis of pseudo r' in lead V1 have not been described and this study aimed to clarify them by analysis of the whole activation sequence of the right atrium using Basket catheter isochronal mapping. The study group comprised 48 patients with AVNRT. Pseudo r' was defined as an upward deflection in the terminal portion of the QRS complex during tachycardia that was not recognized during sinus rhythm and it occurred in 45 patients (94%). During S/F AVNRT, the retrograde atrial activation was earliest on His bundle electrogram, followed by the coronary sinus ostium, distal coronary sinus and high right atrium. Only the high lateral aspect of the right atrium was activated after the end of the QRS complex. The interval between the onset of QRS in multiple surface ECG leads and the atrial activities on high right atrium was similar to the V-r' interval in lead V1 (111+/-20ms, 117+/-11 ms) and correlated with the V-r' interval (r=0.56). Pseudo r' deflection in lead V1 is a highly sensitive indicator of S/F AVNRT, and appears to result from the activation of the superolateral aspect of the right atrium.     

Comparison of adenosine effects on atrioventricular node reentry and atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardias

Background: Adenosine is an established first line therapy for the treatment of narrow complex tachycardias. The two most common etiologies of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) are atrioventricular node reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT). Hypothesis: We postulated that adenosine might have different effects on the termination of AVNRT vs. AVRT, and that these differences might assist in the noninvasive differentiation between these diagnoses. Methods: Fifty-nine patients referred for the diagnosis and treatment of SVT were included in the study. All patients had SVT induced during electrophysiology testing, and each patient received adenosine during SVT. The adenosine dose, time to tachycardia termination, and site of tachycardia termination were recorded. Seventeen patients required isoproterenol administration to initiate SVT. This subset of patients was compared with those not requiring isoproterenol. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in the adenosine dose or time to tachycardia termination when comparing patients with AVNRT with those with AVRT. All patients with AVNRT had termination of tachycardia in the antegrade direction with final activation in the atria. Patients requiring isoproterenol for tachycardia initiation experienced tachycardia termination significantly faster than those not requiring isoproterenol, although there was no difference in the dose of adenosine required for termination. Conclusion: These data demonstrate that patients with dual AV node physiology and AVNRT do not have altered sensitivity to adenosine compared with patients with AVRT and normal AV nodes. Further investigation will be required to determine the clinical utility of the significantly shorter time to tachycardia termination for patients receiving isoproterenol.     

U Wave during Supraventricular Tachycardia: Simulation of a Long RP Tachycardia and Hiding the Common Type AVNRT

The main tool for the differentiation of supraventricular tachycardia is the 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Especially differentiating the atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) from the atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) due to concealed accessory pathway or from an atrial tachycardia (AT) is very important for catheter setting and ablation approach in an electrophysiological study. In our case we saw the occurrence of a U wave during tachycardia—simulating a pseudo P wave. This mimicked a long RP‐tachycardia, although it was a common type AVNRT.     

Clinical and electrophysiological characteristics in patients with atrioventricular reentrant and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.

AIM: To compare clinical, electrophysiological characteristics and transcatheter ablation results between two groups of patients, one with atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT) and the other with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS: The study population consisted of 94 consecutive patients who underwent endocavitary electrophysiological study and radiofrequency (RF) ablation: 46 patients had AVRT due to an accessory pathway with only retrograde conduction while 48 patients had AVNRT. RESULTS: In relation to general and clinical characteristics, differences between the two groups emerged regarding the age of symptom onset (25+/-16 vs 37+/-17 years, p=0.001), the prevalence of heart disease (8 vs 31%, p=0.001) and the correct diagnosis on surface ECG (50 vs 79%, p=0.001). Clinical presentation was quite similar apart from a higher prevalence of fatigue and sweating in the AVNRT group. Transcatheter RF ablation therapy results were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AVRT have a lower mean age at arrhythmia symptom onset compared with those with AVNRT and have fewer associated cardiac abnormalities. Clinical presentation is quite similar as well as their outcome after ablation. A correct diagnosis by standard ECG is more frequent in AVNRT.     

心房起搏时PR与RR间期比值对阵发性室上性心动过速鉴别诊断的意义

为探讨快速心房起搏最短１∶１房室传导时最大ＰＲ间期（ＰＲｍａｘ）与ＲＲ间期比值（ＰＲｍａｘ／ＲＲ）在鉴别阵发性室上性心动过速中的意义，分析比较了２０例房室结折返性心动过速（ＡＶＮＲＴ，有房室结前传跳跃现象者１２例、无跳跃现象者８例）和２０例房室折返性心动过速（ＡＶＲＴ）患者消融前、后快速心房起搏时最短１∶１房室传导的ＰＲｍａｘ／ＲＲ。ＡＶＮＲＴ组消融前、后心房快速起搏时最短１∶１房室传导的ＰＲｍａｘ／ＲＲ为１．１２±０．１２和０．４２±０．０７，两者比较差异有高度显著性，Ｐ＜０．０１；ＡＶＲＴ组为０．５２±０．１６和０．５１±０．１８，两者比较差异无显著性，Ｐ＞０．０５。消融前，ＡＶＮＲＴ组ＰＲｍａｘ／ＲＲ与ＡＶＲＴ组相比有显著性差异（１．１２±０．１２ｖｓ０．５２±０．１６，Ｐ＜０．０１）。ＰＲｍａｘ／ＲＲ＞１诊断ＡＶＮＲＴ的敏感性为９０％、特异性９１％。提示ＰＲｍａｘ／ＲＲ＞１在消融前可用来鉴别ＡＶＮＲＴ与ＡＶＲＴ；对无房室结前传跳跃的ＡＶＮＲＴ，消融后ＰＲｍａｘ／ＲＲ＜１可作为慢径消融成功的指标