克拉霉素、羟氨苄青霉素和兰索拉唑联合治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性出血性十二指肠溃疡的临床疗效观察

目的：旨在探讨克拉霉素、羟氨苄青霉素、兰索拉唑联合应用治疗幽门螺杆菌阳性出血性十二指肠球部溃疡的愈合率和幽门螺杆菌（HP）的根除率。方法：经紧急胃镜确诊的HP阳性的十二指肠球部溃疡并出血的住院患者止血后，106例符合条件的病人随机分成两个治疗组，其中50例口服兰索拉唑30mg，克拉霉素500mg，羟氨苄青霉素1000mg。另一组56例口服兰索拉唑30mg，克拉霉素250mg，羟氨苄青霉索1000mg，用法均为每日2次，疗程1周。继而口服兰索拉唑30mg，每日1次，共1周。疗程式结束后1个月复查胃镜。结果：克拉霉素1000mg组HP根治率及溃疡愈合率分别为93％及93％，稍高于克拉霉素500mg组的80％及92％，但无显著性（P〉0．05）。两组副反应率为8／56例（12％）和8／56例（14．3％），二者比较差异无显著性（P〉O．05）两组副反应总发生率为11．3％。克拉霉素两个剂量组间副反应率无明显差别，末发现严重副反应，病人依从性良好。结论：克拉霉素与羟氨苄青霉素及兰索拉唑合用1周疗法有较理想的溃疡愈合率与HP根治率；克拉霉素用量以每日1000mg为佳。     

兰索拉唑合用阿莫西林根除胃幽门螺杆菌的疗效观察

８４例经胃镜证实的Ｈｐ阳性十二指肠溃疡患者，随机分成二组分别接受兰索拉唑或奥美拉唑加用阿莫西林的根除Ｈｐ治疗。服法ＬＡＮ３０ｍｇ或ＯＭＥ２０ｍｇ，每日２次（早晚服），均加ＡＭＯ０．５ｇ，每日４次（３餐后及睡前），连服１０天为一疗程。以＾１４Ｃ－尿素呼吸试验判断根除与否。结果二组根除率相近，分别为８０％（３２／４０）、７８％（２９／３７）。二组副反应发生率均低（ＬＡＮ组１例轻度腹泻，１例皮疹；ＯＭＥ     

雷贝拉唑与克拉霉素和阿莫西林联用对根除幽门螺杆菌感染的近期疗效

目的：观察雷贝拉唑、克拉霉素、阿莫西林合用对根除幽门螺杆菌（HP）的近期疗效。方法：62例HP阳性的十二指肠球部溃疡病人，随机分2组，治疗组采用雷贝拉唑10mg，第一周每日2次，第2-4周每日1次；阿莫西林1．0每日2次共1周；克拉霉素0．5mg每日2次共1周。对照组采用枸橼酸铋钾220mg每日2次共4周，抗生素使用同治疗组。疗程结束后，复查胃镜观察HP清除及十二指肠溃疡的愈合情况。结果：HP根除率为：治疗组24／26（92．3％），对照组21／25（84％）。结论：雷贝拉唑组能明显缓解十二指肠溃疡的症状，对溃疡有较高的愈合率及HP清除率。     

法莫替丁联合羟氨苄青霉素、替硝唑根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效观察

目的：评价法莫替丁（高舒达）、羟氨苄青霉素、替硝唑三联疗法对幽门螺杆菌（Ｈｐ）相关性消化性溃疡的疗效。方法：将８５例Ｈｐ阳性的十二指肠和／或胃溃疡患者随机分为２组：①法莫替丁组，４２例，每次口服法莫替丁２０ｍｇ、羟氨苄青霉素１０００ｍｇ、替硝唑５００ｍｇ，均每日２次，；②兰索拉唑（达克普隆）组４３例，每次口服兰索拉唑３０ｍｇ、羟氨苄青霉素１０００ｍｇ、替硝唑５００ｍｇ，也均为每日２次，进行对照观察。均２周为１疗程，疗程结束达４周时复查Ｈｐ。结果：兰索拉唑组有３例因过敏性皮疹终止治疗，余下４０例用于统计学分析。法莫替丁组和兰索拉唑组Ｈｐ根除率分别为８８．１％和９０．０％；十二指肠溃疡和／或胃溃疡的愈合率分别为９０．５％和９２．５％。结论：法莫替丁组的Ｈｐ根除率和溃疡愈合率与兰索拉唑组相比较，两组间的差异无显著性（Ｐ＞０．０５）。表明两种三联疗法对根除Ｈｐ和治疗消化性溃疡均有良好效果，均是可供选择的治疗方案。但前者有副作用较少，价格较低廉的优点     

幽门螺杆菌相关性疾病临床根治分析

目的探讨以雷贝拉唑为基础三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌相关消化性溃疡的临床疗效和安全性。方法将93例H．pylori感染的活动性消化性溃疡患者随机分成治疗组42例和对照组41例。治疗组采用雷贝拉唑＋阿莫西林＋替硝唑治疗。对照组采用奥美拉唑＋阿莫西林＋替硝唑治疗。疗程结束后4周,复查胃镜并检测HP,观察患者症状改善程度、溃疡愈合率以及HP根除情况。结果治疗组症状缓解率为95．24％（40／42）,对照组症状缓解率为87．80％（36／41）,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）;治疗组溃疡愈合率和有效率均优于对照组,差异有显著性（P〈0．05）;治疗组和对照组Hp根除率分别为90．48％（38／42）和82．93％（34／41）,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）;两组不良反应比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论雷贝拉唑＋阿莫西林＋替硝唑三联治疗具有疗程短、HP根除率高、副作用小的优点,是目前治疗消化性溃疡和根除HP的理想方法,值得临床推广应用。     

埃索美拉唑治疗Hp阳性十二指肠球部溃疡的疗效观察

目的：比较埃索美拉唑和奥美拉唑三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌（Hp）阳性十二指肠球部溃疡的临床疗效。方法：将50例HP阳性的十二指肠球部溃疡病人随机分成两组：EAC和OAC组，每组25例；EAC组，埃索美拉唑20mg＋阿莫西林1g＋克拉霉素500mg，2次／d，7d；OAC组，奥美拉唑20mg＋阿莫西林1g＋克拉霉素500mg，2次／d，7d，治疗1周后继续以奥美拉唑20mg，每天1次，口服3周。观察比较二组临床症状缓解、溃疡愈合、HP根除及不良反应。结果；EAC组第1天和第2天腹痛缓解率分别为40％（10／25）和64％（16／25），高于OAC组的12％（3／25）和36％（9／25）（P〈O．05）。EAC组和OAC组溃疡愈合率均为96％，HP根除率分别为92％、96％，差异无显著性（P〉O．05）。二组用药后不良反应少。结论：埃索美拉唑三联疗法是治疗Hp阳性的十二指肠溃疡理想方案。     

含左氧氟沙星三联根除幽门螺杆菌临床观察

目的观察左氧氟沙星、兰索拉唑、阿莫西林三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌（Hp）的疗效。方法收集广西梧州市红十字会医院2007-01-2009-08经胃镜检查和Hp检测阳性以及血Hp抗体阳性的慢性活动性胃炎及消化性溃疡患者,随机分为两组,A组（对照组）62例,兰索拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素三联疗法。B组（实验组）64例,兰索拉唑、阿莫西林、左氧氟沙星三联疗法。结果比较两组的治疗效果,A组Hp根除率67.7%,B组的Hp根除率89.1%。结论左氧氟沙星、兰索拉唑、阿莫西林三联疗法治疗Hp根除率高。     

泮托拉唑、甲硝唑与克拉霉素联合治疗十二指肠球部溃疡合并HP感染100例分析

目的：观察三联疗法3周根治十二指肠球部溃疡合并HP感染的疗效。方法：100例经尿素酶、组织学证实为HP感染的十二指肠球部溃疡的患者，使用泮托拉唑片40mg，1次／d口服，用药3周；甲硝唑片0．4g，2次／d；克拉霉素片0．5g，2次／d；同时服1周，停药4周观察临床效果，胃镜下溃疡愈合情况及HP根除率。结果：临床疼痛和缓解率为100％，溃疡愈合好转率93％，HP根除率90％，副作用2％。结论：以新型质子泵抑制剂泮托拉唑为基础的三联疗法HP根除率及溃疡愈合率均高，疗程短，副作用小，依从性好，是理想的治疗HP感染消化性溃疡的效果。     

庆大霉素缓释片、克拉霉素、奥美拉唑7日疗法根除幽门螺杆菌感染疗效观察

目的：观察含庆大霉素缓释片（瑞贝克）的三联疗法与含阿莫西林的三联疗法对根除幽门螺杆菌（Helicobacter Pylori，HP）感染的疗效比较。方法：63例HP.阳性患者，随机分为治疗组和对照组。治疗组予以瑞贝克120mg＋奥美拉唑20mg＋克拉霉素250mg，均1日2次，共7天。对照组予以阿莫西林500mg＋奥美拉唑20mg＋克拉霉素250mg，均1日2次，共7天。疗程结束4～5周后复查HP，观察HP根除率、疼痛缓解率、溃疡愈合率及不良反应等。HP诊断标准为培养、银梁色、快速尿素酶试验，3项中至少2项阳性诊断HP感染，HP根除的判断标准是3项全部阴性或^14C-UBT阴性。结果：瑞贝克三联与阿莫西林三联HP根除率为84．8％及80．0％。溃疡愈合率为83．3％及81．5％，两组比较差异均无显著性（P〉0．05）。结论：瑞贝克三联疗法与阿莫西林三联疗法HP根除疗效相同，是抗HP治疗中值得推广的一种方法。     

奥美拉唑三联疗法对老年人HP感染消化性溃疡疗效观察

目的 观察奥美拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌（HP）感染的临床应用价值。方法 对33例胃溃疡、30例十二指肠球部溃疡病人用奥美拉唑、阿莫西林、灭滴灵三联疗法，并与33例胃溃疡30例十二指肠球部溃疡病人行雷尼替丁、阿莫西林、灭滴灵三联疗法分别治疗4周和2周对照。结果 治疗组与对照组停药2个月后复查，胃溃疡HP根治率分别为86．1％（31／36）及68．9％（20／33），溃疡愈合率分别为88．9％（32／36）及3．6％（21／33），十二指肠球部溃疡HP根治率分别为86．1％（26／30）及63．3％（19／30），溃疡愈合率分别为90％（27／30）及20／30（66．7％）（P〈0．05），治疗不良反应少。结论 奥美拉唑三联疗法能有效根除老年人消化性溃疡HP感染，不良反应少。     

药物联合物理治疗根除HP+消化性溃疡再出血的临床研究

目的 :探讨药物 (达克普隆 )联合毫米波 (mmW)对根除HP阳性的消化性溃疡再出血的疗效。方法 :对消化性溃疡并出血的病人 ,随机选择HP阳性的病人分A组 (治疗组 )、B组 (对照组 )、HP阴性组 (C组 ) ,均用达克普隆治疗 ,30mg/次 ,2次 /d ,共 2周 ,A组加用毫米波治疗。治疗 32周后 ,均再服用达克普隆 ,1次 /d ,共 2周。随访 18个月。结果 :ABC三组患者溃疡愈合率分别为 10 0 % ,94 .8% ,95 % ,三组互相比较无明显差异 (P >0 .0 5 ) ,A ,B两组Hp根除率为 87.1%和 15 .3% ,两者相比有显著差异 (P <0 .0 5 ) ,随访 18个月后 ,两组再出血率分别为 2 .5 6 %和 30 .7% ,两者相比有显著差异 (P <0 .0 5 )。而C组再出血率为 12 .5 % ,与AB两组比较无显著差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论 :达克普隆联合毫米波治疗对溃疡愈合与HP根除优于单用达克普隆治疗 ,且出血率也低     

首次根除幽门螺杆菌失败后二线药物治疗临床研究

目的 研究首次根除幽门螺杆菌（Hp）失败后二线药物的疗效,提高Hp最终根除率.方法 选择我院消化科门诊经胃镜确诊慢性胃炎、消化性溃疡、胃癌等常见上消化道疾病Hp阳性患者,经首次根除Hp失败后病例750例作为研究对象,并随机分为A、B、C三组各250例.A组250例,首先以PPI标准剂量＋果胶铋300 mg＋左氧氟沙星200 mg＋四环素500 mg,bid,治疗7d;之后再以PPI标准剂量＋果胶铋300 mg＋阿奇霉素250 mg＋呋喃唑酮100 mg,bid,治疗7d.B组250例,PPI标准剂量＋果胶铋300 mg＋阿奇霉素250 mg＋呋喃唑酮100 mg,bid,疗程14 d.C组250例,PPI标准剂量＋果胶铋300 mg＋左氧氟沙星200 mg＋四环素500 mg,bid,疗程14 d.结果 A、B、C三组Hp根除率分别为99.0％、86.0％、94.0％.A组大于B组和C组.结论 对于首次根除Hp失败患者,采取PPI＋果胶铋＋左氧氟沙星（或阿奇霉素）＋四环素（或呋喃唑酮）四联14 d疗法有较高的根除率,尤其是A组14 d序贯疗法根除Hp疗效更佳,三组均有用药简单,价格低廉,副作用少,患者依从性好,易于接受等特点.     

The impact of primary antibiotic resistance on the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate- vs. omeprazole-based one-week triple therapies in H. pylori eradication--a randomised controlled trial

AIMS: To compare ranitidine bismuth citrate with omeprazole as to their efficacy to eradicate H. pylori in two different treatment schedules both consisting of a combination of either of above with two antibiotics for 1 week, and to relate these treatment results to primary antibiotic resistance. METHODS: 256 H. pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomised to one of the following four treatment groups: omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (OCA); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + amoxycillin 1000 mg (RBCCA); omeprazole 20 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (OCM); ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg + clarithromycin 500 mg + metronidazole 500 mg (RBCCM). All drugs were given twice daily for one week. The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori by CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomisation and 4-6 weeks after completion of therapy. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin, metronidazole and amoxycillin was determined by E-test. RESULTS: On per-protocol analysis, overall eradication rates were 96% for RBCCA vs. 85% for OCA (p = 0.03), and 95% for RBCCM vs. 79% for OCM (p = 0.01). Amongst the 196 patients (77% of the entire study group) in whom antibiotic sensitivity testing was technically feasible, primary resistance was found in 8% for clarithromycin, in 33% for metronidazole, and in 0% for amoxycillin. Eradication of clarithromycin sensitive/resistant strains was 89%/40% for OCA (p = 0.0042) and 98%/80% for RBCCA (p = 0.0428). When strains were sensitive to both antibiotics, cure rates with OCM/RBCCM were 87%/96% respectively (p = 0.39), for strains resistant to clarithromycin only, eradication was achieved in 82% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.2), and in the case of metronidazole resistance in 85% with OCM vs. 94% with RBCCM (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with clarithromycin and either metronidazole or amoxycillin produced higher eradication rates than omeprazole co-administered with the same antibiotics. This appeared especially prominent in the subgroups with clarithromycin resistance without, however, reaching statistical significance. Efficacy of neither eradication regimen was influenced by metronidazole sensitivity to a significant degree.     

High eradication rate of H. pylori with moxifloxacin-based treatment: a randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori remains a problematic treatment issue in clinical practice. The intention is to find a treatment that achieves a high rate of eradication at a low price and treatment options that are now used give us the opportunity to achieve this goal. Recently published results showing a low rate of resistance and better compliance with moxifloxacin-based treatment regimens indicate the need to investigate its efficacy in H. pylori eradication. This study is based on proving the efficacy of moxifloxacin in H. pylori eradication within the triple therapy. AIMS AND METHODS: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of one week of moxifloxacin-based treatment with the standard treatment for H. pylori eradication. Patients with H. pylori infection and non-ulcer dyspepsia (n = 277) were randomly divided into four groups to receive: moxifloxacin 400 mg/d, metronidazole 400 mg twice daily, lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily (MML group); moxifloxacin 400 mg/d, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily (MAL group); clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, metronidazole 400 mg twice daily, lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily (CML group); clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1 g twice daily, lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily (CAL group). The patients were assessed for prevalence of H. pylori using the CLO test, histology and culture on gastric biopsy samples obtained during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before randomization and 4-6 weeks after completion of treatment. Bacterial sensitivity to clarithromycin and moxifloxacin was determined with the E-test. RESULTS: 265 (95.6%) patients completed the study forming the basis for PP analysis. Eradication rates of H. pylori in ITT and in PP analyses were: in the MML group 93.5% (58/62) and 96.7% (58/60), respectively; in the MAL group 86.4% (57/66) and 90.5% (57/63); in the CML group 70.4% (50/71) and 75.8% (50/66); and in the CAL group 78.2% (61/78) and 80.2% (61/76). Moxifloxacin treatment protocols were significantly more effective on both ITT and PP analyses than the clarithromycin based protocols with only one exception (MAL vs. CAL on ITT analysis). Among 238 patients (86% of the entire study group), strains showing primary resistance to clarithromycin were found in 10.8% and to moxifloxacin in 5.9%. Eradication of moxifloxacin sensitive/resistant strains was 98.1%/75% for MML (p < 0.01) and 91.1%/66.7% for MAL (p = n.s.); comparison of eradication of sensitive strains in MML and MAL regimens was 98.1%/91.1% (p < 0.05), and for resistant strains 75%/66.7% (p = n.s.). CML and CAL protocols did not differ in efficacy of eradication of clarithromycin sensitive or resistant strains. CONCLUSION: Moxifloxacin-based triple therapies showed higher eradication rates with few side effects and good drug compliance when compared with standard H. pylori treatments. Moreover, the increased prevalence of clarithromycin resistance suggests that moxifloxacin-based regimens could be safe and effective options in treatment of H. pylori infection.     

埃索美拉唑、克拉霉素与甲硝唑联合治疗消化性溃疡65例

目的研究埃索美拉唑、克拉霉素、甲硝唑三联治疗消化性渍疡的疗效。方法将126例经内镜诊断并检测证实幽门螺杆菌（Hp）阳性的消化性溃疡患者随机分为两组。治疗组65例，给予埃索美拉唑20mg＋克拉霉素500mg＋甲硝唑400mg，每日2次，共7d；对照组61倒，给予奥美拉唑20mg＋克拉霉素500mg＋甲硝唑400mg，每日2次，共7d。疗程结束4周后复查胃镜并检测Hp，观察腹痛缓解率、溃疡愈合率，Hp根除率及用药后的不良反应等。结果治疗组组第1d和第2d腹痛缓解率分别为33．8％和53．8％，高于对照组的16．4％和39．3％，有显著性差异（P〈0．05）。治疗组和对照组溃疡治愈率分别为90．8％和86．9％，治疗组和对照组Hp根除率分别为90．8％和86．9％，差异无显著性（P〉0．05）。两组用药后不良反应少，有较好的安全性。结论埃索美拉唑、克拉霉素、甲硝唑三联疗法治疗Hp阳性的消化性溃疡安全有效，腹痛缓解速度优于奥美拉唑三联疗法。     

Effectiveness of eradication anti-helicobacter therapy in patients with duodenal ulcer in different drug dosage regimens

46 patients having exacerbation of duodenal ulcer in the presence of Helicobacter pylori (HP) were studied for efficacy of HP eradication treatment which comprised omeprazole (40 mg/day), colloid bismuth subcitrate (480 mg/day) and metronidazole (1000 mg/day) for 2 weeks. According to the dosage regimen the patients were divided into two groups. Patients of group 1 received the drugs in fractions, of group 2--in a single daily doses. The eradication therapy in both dosage regimen was high (73 and 88%, respectively). Thus, it is proved that single daily doses of actibacterial drugs can be also used in clinical practice for conduction of eradication therapy.     

我院2007—2008年多发性消化性溃疡发病及诊治情况分析

目的探讨多发性消化性溃疡的发病及诊治情况。方法回顾性分析本院2007-2008消化内科胃镜检查等临床资料。结果2007、2008年消化性溃疡检出率分别为23．57％;25．19％,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。多发性溃疡各占6．41％;6．33％,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。2007、2008年多发性消化性溃疡损害因素HP感染率分别为80．77％;82．76％,药物因素各占42．31％;37．93％,血清胃泌素平均值分别（139±21．3）,（141±20．9）,差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。并发症出现率分别为30．77％;37．93％,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。两种不同治疗方法患者症状缓解、溃疡愈合不良反应比较无统计学差异（P〉0．05）。HP根除率分别71．43％;95．24％,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论多发性消化性溃疡在消化性溃疡中的发病率相对稳定,HP、NSAID与胃泌素仍是最重要的致病因素,以埃索美拉唑＋左旋氧氟沙星为中心的三联疗法明显优于传统的治疗方法。     

A comparative study; one week treatment versus two weeks treatment with lansoprazol, amoxycillin and clarythromycin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patient with gastric and duodenal ulcer

The combination therapy of lansoprazol (LPZ), amoxycillin (AMPC), and clarythromycin (CAM) (LAC regimen) is one of the most effective eradication regimen of Helicobacter pylori (HP) positive ulcer patients, but the optimal treatment period of this therapy is still pending. The aim of this study was to assess the optimal treatment period of this regimen. One hundred and six patients who diagnosed as HP positive gastric and duodenal ulcer since August 1996 were randomized to one-week treatment group (group 1) or to two-weeks treatment group (group 2): LPZ 30 mg once daily, AMPC 1500 mg twice daily, CAM 800 mg twice daily. Both group received four weeks LPZ treatment (30 mg once daily) following the each combination therapy. The eradication rate of HP was 82.1% (43/56) in group 1 and 85.7% (36/42) in group 2. There was no statistical significant difference between two groups (p = 0.636). Although both treatment regimen was very useful for eradicating HP in the HP positive ulcer patients, one week LAC regimen would be better choice judging from the cost benefit.     

幽门螺杆菌感染与反流性食管炎及Barrett食管的相关性

目的 探讨幽门螺杆菌的根除与反流性食管炎(RE)及Barrett食管(BE)的相关性及临床意义.方法 262例患者(RE177例、BE 85例)分为无幽门螺杆菌感染组139例(A组),有幽门螺杆菌感染组123例(B组);B组又随机分成2个亚组,B1组62例,B2组61例.A组及B1组给予洛赛克20 mg/次,2次/d,多潘立酮10 mg/次,3次/d,果胶铋100 mg/次,3次/d,疗程为8周;B2组在A组、B1组治疗方法的基础上加用阿莫西林500 mg/次,2次/d,克拉霉素500 mg/次,2次/d或替硝唑500 mg/次,2;A/d,其中三种抗生素选两种,应用2周.治疗前及治疗后行内镜、病理及24 h食管pH及胆红素监测检查.结果 治疗后3组患者症状改善总有效率均达95.0%以上[分别为A组97.8%(136/139)、B1组96.8%(60/62)、B2组98.4%(60/61)],与治疗前比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但3组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);内镜下3组反流性食管炎患者总有效率分别为92.9%(78/84)、91.8%(45/49)、88.6%(39/44),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),Barrett食管患者未见明显效果,有效率约35.0%,与治疗前比较差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);3组患者24 h食管pH及胆红素监测与治疗前比较均有显著改善(P<0.05),但3组间比较无明显差异(P>0.05).结论 幽门螺旋杆菌感染的RE及BE患者,可进行抗HP治疗但须同时进行抑制胃酸减少胃液,促进胃排空及保护食道黏膜的系统治疗,短期内可有效预防RE及BE的进展,长期效果还有待长期、大量的临床病例观察.     

Quadruple therapy with ecabet sodium,omeprazole, amoxicillin and metronidazole is effective for eradication of Helicobacter pylori after failure of first‐line therapy (KDOG0201 Study)

Background and object: An antiulcer agent, ecabet sodium, is active against Helicobacter pylori. The aim of the present study was to clinically examine whether eradication therapy, which includes ecabet sodium, is effective in eradication of H. pylori after failure of first‐line therapy. Methods: Patients with peptic ulcer who failed with first‐line triple eradication therapy containing clarithromycin received quadruple therapy with omeprazole (20 mg, twice daily), amoxicillin (750 mg, twice daily), metronidazole (500 mg, twice daily) and ecabet sodium (1000 mg, twice daily) for 14 days. Eradication of H. pylori was judged by ¹³C‐urea breath test 8 weeks later. Results: Fifty‐two patients (36 men and 16 women) were included. Their mean age was 51·4 years (range 28–73). One patient dropped out because of diarrhoea. The eradication rate was 98·0% (50/51) according to the per‐protocol analysis and 96·2% (50/52) according to the intention‐to‐treat analysis. Side effects occurred in seven patients, but none were serious. Conclusions: Quadruple therapy including ecabet sodium is useful as second‐line eradication treatment for H. pylori.