The effect of risedronate on bone mineralization as measured by micro-computed tomography with synchrotron radiation: correlation to histomorphometric indices of turnover

The primary goal of our study was to determine changes in bone mineralization in postmenopausal osteoporotic women treated for 3 years with risedronate or placebo. A secondary goal was to determine the relationship between mineralization and indices of bone turnover measured on the same biopsies. The degree of mineralization was measured by micro-computed tomography using Synchrotron radiation (Synchrotron microCT) in the trabecular bone of paired transiliac biopsies taken at baseline and after 3 years of treatment from patients receiving risedronate 5 mg daily (n=11) or placebo (n=8). In the risedronate-treated patients, the average mineralization (Avg-MIN) and peak mineralization (Peak-MIN) at 3 years were significantly increased from baseline by 4.7% (P<0.0001) and 5.4% (P=0.0003), respectively and showed significant negative correlation to turnover indices. In the placebo-treated patients, the increases in Avg-MIN (2.0%) and Peak-MIN (1.6%) were not significantly different from baseline and correlation to turnover indices was weaker. Risedronate significantly reduced the ratio of low- to high-mineralized bone fractions estimated by volume (BMR-V) and surface area (BMR-S) by 70.1% and 54.1%, respectively from baseline. These changes were consistent with the significant reduction of turnover from baseline assessed by reductions in mineralizing surface, MS/BS (-72.8%); activation frequency, Ac.F (-60.4%); and bone formation rate, BFR-BV (-63.6%) in the same biopsies in the risedronate-treated patients. Comparing the pair-wise changes from baseline, risedronate significantly reduced the low-mineralized bone fraction in comparison to placebo, as indicated by a larger reduction of BMR-V (P=0.015) and BMR-S (P=0.035). In the risedronate group, BMR-V and BMR-S showed significant positive correlation to MS/BS (R2: 0.83 and 0.92, respectively). The correlations to Ac.F and BFR-BV were also significant, with BMR-S showing a strong relation (R2: 0.77 and 0.79, respectively). The data suggest that BMR-V and BMR-S are markers of turnover of trabecular bone and may be used to assess treatment effect on turnover in bone biopsies. The results demonstrate that the reduction of turnover by risedronate increased the degree of mineralization and reduced the ratio of low- to high-mineralized bone fractions which may increase bone's resistance to fracture.     

Risedronate preserves bone architecture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis as measured by three-dimensional microcomputed tomography

The deterioration of trabecular microarchitecture induced by elevated bone turnover is increasingly recognized as a factor in the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fractures. We investigated the effect of the reduction of turnover with risedronate on trabecular architecture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Iliac crest bone biopsy specimens taken before and after 3 years of treatment from patients receiving risedronate 5 mg daily (n = 21) or placebo (n = 17) were analyzed using 3-D microcomputed tomography. We found a significant correlation between baseline bone turnover and bone loss in the placebo group, providing evidence that higher turnover induced higher bone loss leading to a greater degree of architectural degradation. When patients were classified into two groups based on baseline bone turnover (MS/BS less than or greater than the median value for the entire cohort), significant decreases in trabecular bone volume (BV/TV, P = 0.009) and trabecular thickness (Tb.Th*, P = 0.008) and an increase in marrow star volume (Ma.St.V, P = 0.008), a measure of trabecular porosity, were observed in the higher turnover (MS/BS> median) placebo-treated patients. The trabecular structure shifted from plates to rods as shown by an increase in structure model index (SMI, P = 0.028) and bone surface to bone volume ratio (BS/BV, P = 0.006). The changes from baseline in the lower turnover (MS/BS相似文献   

Effects of 3- and 5-year treatment with risedronate on bone mineralization density distribution in triple biopsies of the iliac crest in postmenopausal women.

Long-term effects of risedronate on bone mineralization density distribution in triple transiliac crest biopsies of osteoporotic women were evaluated. In this double-blinded study, 3- and 5-year treatment with risedronate increased the degree and homogeneity of mineralization without producing hypermineralization. These changes at the material level of bone could contribute to risedronate's antifracture efficacy. INTRODUCTION: Risedronate, a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, is widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. It reduces bone turnover, increases BMD, and decreases fracture risk. To date, there are no data available on the long-term effects of risedronate on bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD) in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Osteoporotic women enrolled in the VERT-NA trial received either risedronate (5 mg/day, orally) or placebo for up to 5 years. All subjects received calcium and vitamin D supplementation if deficient at baseline. Triple iliac crest biopsies were collected from a subset of these subjects at baseline and 3 and 5 years. BMDD was measured in these biopsies using quantitative backscattered electron imaging, and the data were also compared with a normal reference group. RESULTS: At baseline, both risedronate and placebo groups had a lower degree and a greater heterogeneity of mineralization as well as an increase in low mineralized bone compared with the normal reference group. The degree of mineralization increased significantly in the risedronate as well as in the placebo group after 3- and 5-year treatment compared with baseline. However, the degree of mineralization did not exceed that of normal. Three-year treatment with risedronate significantly increased the homogeneity of mineralization and slightly decreased low mineralized bone compared with placebo. Surprisingly with 5-year risedronate treatment, heterogeneity of mineralization increased compared with 3-year treatment, which might indicate an increase in newly formed bone. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment with risedronate affects the homogeneity and degree of mineralization without inducing hypermineralization of the bone matrix. These changes at the material level of the bone matrix may contribute to risedronate's antifracture efficacy in osteoporotic patients.     

Bone material properties in trabecular bone from human iliac crest biopsies after 3- and 5-year treatment with risedronate.

Long-term effects of risedronate on bone mineral maturity/crystallinity and collagen cross-link ratio in triple iliac crest biopsies of osteoporotic women were evaluated. In this double-blinded study, 3- and 5-year treatment with risedronate arrested the tissue aging encountered in untreated osteoporosis and in osteoporosis treated with other antiresorptives. This effect may be contributing to risedronate's antifracture efficacy. INTRODUCTION: Risedronate is widely used in the treatment of osteoporosis. It reduces bone turnover, increases BMD, and decreases fracture risk. To date, there are no data available on the long-term effects of risedronate on bone material properties in humans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Osteoporotic women enrolled in the VERT-NA trial received either risedronate (5 mg/day, orally) or placebo for up to 5 years. All subjects received calcium. They also received vitamin D supplementation if deficient at baseline. Triple iliac crest biopsies were collected from a subset of these subjects at baseline, 3 years, and 5 years. Mineral maturity/crystallinity and collagen cross-link ratio was measured in these biopsies using Fourier transform infrared imaging. RESULTS: Patients that received placebo exhibited increased mineral maturity/crystallinity and collagen cross-link ratio after 3 and 5 years compared with baseline values. On the contrary, patients that received risedronate retained baseline values in both bone material indices throughout. A more spatially detailed analysis revealed that this was achieved mainly through beneficial effects on active bone-forming areas. Surprisingly, patients that received risedronate achieved premenopausal values at bone-forming areas in both indices after 5 years of treatment. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with risedronate affects bone material properties (mineral maturity/crystallinity and collagen cross-link ratio) and arrests the tissue aging apparent in untreated osteoporosis. These changes at the material level of the bone matrix may contribute to risedronate's rapid and sustained antifracture efficacy in osteoporotic patients.     

The efficacy and tolerability of risedronate on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in osteoporotic Chinese women: a randomized placebo-controlled study

Osteoporosis has become an important health problem in postmenopausal Asian populations as the prevalence of hip and vertebral fractures in some Asian countries has risen to approach that of Caucasian populations. Risedronate, a pyridinyl-bisphosphonate agent, is a potent inhibitor of bone resorption. Risedronate increases bone mineral density (BMD), reduces markers of bone turnover, and reduces the risk of fractures in Caucasian postmenopausal women. To determine the efficacy and tolerability of risedronate in Chinese, a multicenter, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study was performed in Hong Kong. Sixty-five (65) postmenopausal osteoporotic Southern Chinese women, aged 67+/-6 years, were randomly assigned to receive either risedronate 5 mg daily (n=31) or placebo (n=34) for 12 months. All women received calcium carbonate 500 mg daily and vitamin D 400 IU daily. Mean baseline BMD T-score at the spine and total hip was -3.4 and -2.6, respectively. A significant increase in spine BMD was already evident at month 3 of risedronate treatment (P<0.001). Risedronate significantly increased BMD and reduced bone turnover markers as compared with placebo. The risedronate group had significant increase in BMD at 12 months at both the spine and hip when compared with the placebo group (L1-4 6.6% vs. 0.4%, P<0.001; total hip 2.7% vs. 0.3, P<0.0001; femoral neck 1.8% vs. 1.1%, P<0.02; trochanter 4% vs. 1.1%, P<0.0001, respectively). Significant changes in urine N-telopeptide (NTx) and serum osteocalcin were evident as early as 1 and 3 months, respectively, with risedronate treatment. No significant changes were seen in both BMD and bone markers in the placebo group. Risedronate was well tolerated without major adverse effects. We conclude that risedronate is an effective and well-tolerated agent for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Asian population.     

Risedronate Preserves Bone Architecture in Early Postmenopausal Women In 1 Year as Measured by Three-Dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Risedronate reduces the risk of vertebral fractures by up to 70% within the first year of treatment. Increases in bone mineral density or decreases in bone turnover markers explain only a portion of the anti-fracture effect, suggesting that other factors, such as changes in trabecular bone architecture, also play a role. Our objective was to determine the effects of risedronate on bone architecture by analyzing iliac crest bone biopsy specimens using three-dimensional microcomputed tomography (3-D µCT). Biopsy specimens were obtained at baseline and after 1 year of treatment from women enrolled in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of risedronate 5 mg daily for the prevention of early postmenopausal bone loss. Trabecular architecture deteriorated in the placebo group (n = 12), as indicated by a 20.3% decrease in bone volume (25.1% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.034), a 13.5% decrease in trabecular number (1.649 vs. 1.426 mm^–1, P = 0.052), a 13.1% increase in trabecular separation (605 vs. 684 µm, P = 0.056), and an 86.2% increase in marrow star volume (3.251 vs. 6.053 mm³, P = 0.040) compared with baseline values. These changes in architectural parameters occurred in the presence of a concomitant decrease from baseline in lumbar spine bone mineral density (–3.3%, P = 0.002), as measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. There was no statistically significant (P < 0.05) deterioration in the risedronate-treated group (n = 14) over the 1-year treatment period. Comparing the actual changes between the two groups, the placebo group experienced decreases in bone volume (placebo, –5.1%; risedronate, +3.5%; P = 0.011), trabecular thickness (placebo, –20 µm; risedronate, +23 µm; P = 0.032), and trabecular number (placebo, –0.223 mm^–1; risedronate, +0.099 mm^–1; P = 0.010), and increases in percent plate (placebo, +2.79%; risedronate, –3.23%; P = 0.018), trabecular separation (placebo, +79 µm; risedronate, –46 µm; P = 0.010) and marrow star volume (placebo, +2.80 mm³ ; risedronate, –2.08mm³; P = 0.036), compared with the risedronate group. These data demonstrate that trabecular architecture deteriorated significantly in this cohort of early postmenopausal women, and that this deterioration was prevented by risedronate. Although there is no direct link in this study between fracture and preservation of architecture, it is reasonable to infer that the preservation of bone architecture may play a role in risedronates anti-fracture efficacy.     

Five Years of Treatment with Risedronate and its Effects on Bone Safety in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

We have recently reported that risedronate preserves normal bone formation and decreases bone remodeling in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis after 3 years of treatment. We report now the results of a 2-year extension study. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effect of 5 years of risedronate treatment (5 mg daily) on bone quality and bone remodeling based on paired transiliac bone biopsies. There were additional measurements that included bone turnover markers and bone mineral density (BMD). Histologic evaluation of biopsy sections (placebo, n = 21; risedronate, n = 27) yielded no pathologic findings after 5 years in either treatment group. Histomorphometric assessment of paired biopsy specimens after 5 years (placebo, n =12; risedronate, n = 13) found no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in structural or resorption parameters. There was a significant reduction in osteoid (–27%) and mineralizing surfaces (–49%) from baseline values in the risedronate group that were also significantly different from placebo at 5 years. Similarly, activation frequency decreased significantly (–77%) in the risedronate group, although it was not significantly different from placebo at 5 years (0.09 vs. 0.21, respectively). Double tetracycline labels were identified in all biopsy specimens indicating continuous bone turnover. After 5 years of risedronate treatment, serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP) and N-telopeptide (NTX) decreased significantly from baseline by 33.3% and 47.5%, respectively. In the placebo group, bone ALP decreased by 3.9% (P = NS), whereas NTX decreased by 27.0% (P < 0.005). Lumbar spine BMD increased significantly in the risedronate group (9.2%), whereas no significant change was seen in the placebo group (–0.26%). Risedronate was overall well tolerated; during the 2-year study extension nonvertebral fractures occurred in 7 patients in placebo and 2 patients in risedronate groups. The findings from this study are consistent with the antiremodeling effect of risedronate and support long-term bone safety and antifracture efficacy of risedronate treatment.This work was supported by grants from Procter & Gamble Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Mason, Ohio, and Aventis Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, New Jersey.     

Long-term risedronate treatment normalizes mineralization and continues to preserve trabecular architecture: sequential triple biopsy studies with micro-computed tomography

The objective of the study was to assess the time course of changes in bone mineralization and architecture using sequential triple biopsies from women with postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) who received long-term treatment with risedronate. Transiliac biopsies were obtained from the same subjects (n = 7) at baseline and after 3 and 5 years of treatment with 5 mg daily risedronate. Mineralization was measured using 3-dimensional (3D) micro-computed tomography (CT) with synchrotron radiation and was compared to levels in healthy premenopausal women (n = 12). Compared to the untreated PMO women at baseline, the premenopausal women had higher average mineralization (Avg-MIN) and peak mineralization (Peak-MIN) by 5.8% (P = 0.003) and 8.0% (P = 0.003), respectively, and lower ratio of low to high-mineralized bone volume (BMR-V) and surface area (BMR-S) by 73.3% (P = 0.005) and 61.7% (P = 0.003), respectively. Relative to baseline, 3 years of risedronate treatment significantly increased Avg-MIN (4.9 +/- 1.1%, P = 0.016) and Peak-MIN (6.2 +/- 1.5%, P = 0.016), and significantly decreased BMR-V (-68.4 +/- 7.3%, P = 0.016) and BMR-S (-50.2 +/- 5.7%, P = 0.016) in the PMO women. The changes were maintained at the same level when treatment was continued up to 5 years. These results are consistent with the significant reduction of turnover observed after 3 years of treatment and which was similarly maintained through 5 years of treatment. Risedronate restored the degree of mineralization and the ratios of low- to high-mineralized bone to premenopausal levels after 3 years of treatment, suggesting that treatment reduced bone turnover in PMO women to healthy premenopausal levels. Conventional micro-CT analysis further demonstrated that bone volume (BV/TV) and trabecular architecture did not change from baseline up to 5 years of treatment, suggesting that risedronate provided long-term preservation of trabecular architecture in the PMO women. Overall, risedronate provided sustained benefits on mineralization and architecture, two key determinants of bone strength, over 5 years lending support for its long-term efficacy in fracture risk reduction.     

Evidence that Treatment with Risedronate in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Affects Bone Mineralization and Bone Volume

Risedronate is used in osteoporosis treatment. Postmenopausal women enrolled in the Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy trial received either risedronate (5 mg/day) or placebo for 3 years. Subjects received calcium and vitamin D supplementation if deficient at baseline. Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at baseline and at 3 years. Quantitative back-scattered electron imaging (qBEI) was performed on paired iliac crest biopsies (risedronate, n = 18; placebo, n = 13) before and after treatment, and the mineral volume fraction in the trabecular bone was calculated. Combining dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric values with the mineral volume fraction for the same patients allowed us to calculate the relative change in trabecular bone volume with treatment. This showed that the effect on BMD was likely to be due partly to changes in matrix mineralization and partly due to changes in bone volume. After treatment, trabecular bone volume in the lumbar spine tended to increase in the risedronate group (+2.4%, nonsignificant) but there was a significant decrease (−3.7%, P < 0.05) in the placebo group. Calcium supplementation with adequate levels of vitamin D led to an ∼3.3% increase in mineral content in the bone material independently of risedronate treatment. This increase was larger in patients with lower matrix mineralization at baseline and likely resulted from correction of calcium/vitamin D deficiency as well as from reduced bone remodeling. Combining BMD and bone mineralization density distribution data show that in postmenopausal osteoporosis 3-year treatment with risedronate preserves or may increase trabecular bone volume, unlike placebo. This analysis also allows, for the first time, separation of the contributions of bone volume and matrix mineralization to the increase in BMD.     

Relationship between changes in bone mineral density and vertebral fracture risk associated with risedronate: greater increases in bone mineral density do not relate to greater decreases in fracture risk.

Low bone mineral density (BMD) is correlated with increased fracture risk. Whether greater BMD increases induced by osteoporosis drugs are related to greater decreases in fracture risk is controversial. We analyzed the relationship between BMD change and fracture risk in postmenopausal osteoporotic women receiving antiresorptive treatment. The analysis combined data from three pivotal risedronate fracture end-point trials. Women received risedronate (n = 2047) or placebo (n = 1177) daily for up to 3 yr. The BMD and vertebral radiographs were assessed periodically during 3 yr. The estimated risk of new vertebral fracture was compared between patients whose BMD increased and those whose BMD decreased. Risedronate-treated patients whose BMD decreased were at a significantly greater risk (p = 0.003) of sustaining a vertebral fracture than patients whose BMD increased. The fracture risk was similar (about 10%) in risedronate-treated patients whose increases in BMD were < 5% (the median change from baseline) and in those whose increases were >/= 5% (p = 0.453). The changes in lumbar spine BMD explained only 18% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%, 26%; p < 0.001) of risedronate's vertebral fracture efficacy. Although patients showing an increase in BMD had a lower fracture risk than patients showing a decrease in BMD, greater increases in BMD did not necessarily predict greater decreases in fracture risk.     

Effect of Risedronate on Osteocyte Viability and Bone Turnover in Paired Iliac Bone Biopsies from Early Postmenopausal Women

It is unclear whether standard clinical doses of risedronate affect osteocyte viability. This study examined osteocyte viability and bone remodeling rate in early postmenopausal women (1–5 years after menopause) who were treated with a standard clinical dose of risedronate (5 mg/day, orally) for 1 year. Paired transiliac bone biopsies were obtained from 19 postmenopausal women at baseline and after 1-year treatment with placebo (n = 8, mean age 52.9 ± 3.4 years) or risedronate 5 mg/day (n = 11, mean age 52.5 ± 3.4 years). In these samples, we measured osteocyte- and bone remodeling-related variables in trabecular bone. In both the placebo and risedronate groups, empty lacunae were significantly decreased after 1-year treatment compared to baseline. There were no significant differences in osteocyte-related variables between placebo and risedronate. Risedronate significantly reduced bone-remodeling indices including mineralizing surface (MS/BS), bone formation rate (BFR/BS), and activation frequency (Ac.f). Risedronate treatment caused significantly lower MS/BS and Ac.f than placebo administration. In conclusion, risedronate 5 mg/day effectively inhibited bone remodeling but did not significantly reduce osteocyte viability in trabecular bone.     

Heel ultrasound can assess maintenance of bone mass in women with breast cancer

Postmenopausal women with early stage breast cancer are at increased risk for bone loss and fractures. Bisphosphonates can prevent bone loss, but little data are available on changes in bone mass assessed by heel quantitative ultrasound (QUS). Our objectives were to determine if (1) heel QUS would provide a reliable and accessible method for evaluation of changes in bone mass in women with breast cancer when compared with the current standard of bone mass measurement, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and (2) oral risedronate could affect these changes. Eighty-six newly postmenopausal (up to 8 yr) women with nonmetastatic breast cancer were randomized to risedronate, 35 mg once weekly or placebo. Outcomes were changes in heel QUS bone mass measurements and conventional DXA-derived bone mineral density (BMD). Over 2 yr, bone mass assessed by heel QUS remained stable in women on risedronate, whereas women on placebo had a 5.2% decrease (p ≤ 0.05) in heel QUS bone mass. Both total hip BMD and femoral neck BMD assessed by DXA decreased by 1.6% (p ≤ 0.05) in the placebo group and remained stable with risedronate. Spine BMD remained stable in both groups. Heel QUS was moderately associated with BMD measured by DXA at the total hip (r=0.50), femoral neck (r=0.40), and spine (r=0.46) at baseline (all p ≤ 0.001). In conclusion, risedronate helps to maintain skeletal integrity as assessed by heel QUS for women with early stage breast cancer. Heel QUS is associated with DXA-derived BMD at other major axial sites and may be used to follow skeletal health and bone mass changes in these women.     

Long-term efficacy of risedronate: a 5-year placebo-controlled clinical experience

Limited placebo-controlled data are available to assess the long-term fracture efficacy of bisphosphonates. In order to determine the effects of 5 years of risedronate treatment, we extended a 3-year, placebo-controlled vertebral fracture study in osteoporotic women for an additional 2 years; women who entered the extension study continued to receive 5 mg risedronate or placebo according to the original randomization, with maintenance of blinding. End points included vertebral and nonvertebral fracture assessments, bone mineral density measurements, and changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover. A total of 265 women (placebo, 130; 5 mg risedronate, 135) entered the study extension and 220 (83%) completed the additional 2 years. Fracture results observed in the study extension were consistent with those observed in the first 3 years. The risk of new vertebral fractures was significantly reduced with risedronate treatment in years 4 and 5 by 59% (95% confidence interval, 19 to 79%, P = 0.01) compared with a 49% reduction in the first 3 years. Rapid and significant decreases in markers of bone turnover observed in the first 3 years were similarly maintained in the next 2 years of treatment. Increases in spine and hip bone mineral density that occurred in the risedronate group during the first 3 years were maintained or increased with a further 2 years of treatment. The mean increase from baseline in lumbar spine BMD over 5 years was 9.3% (P < 0.001). This study demonstrates that the effects of risedronate over 3 years on vertebral fracture and BMD are maintained with a further 2 years of treatment.     

Effects of Risedronate Treatment on Bone Density and Vertebral Fracture in Patients on Corticosteroid Therapy

Men and women (n = 518) receiving moderate-to-high doses of corticosteroids were enrolled in two studies with similar protocols and randomly assigned to receive either placebo or risedronate (2.5 or 5 mg) for 1 year. All patients received daily calcium supplementation (500–1000 mg), and most also received supplemental vitamin D (400 IU). The primary endpoint was the difference between the placebo and active groups in lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) at 1 year; changes in BMD at other sites, biochemical markers of bone turnover, and the incidence of vertebral fractures were also assessed. In the overall population, the mean (SE) lumbar spine BMD increased 1.9 ± 0.38% from baseline in the risedronate 5 mg group (P < 0.001) and decreased 1.0 ± 0.4% in the placebo group (P= 0.005). BMD at the femoral neck, trochanter, and distal radius increased or was maintained with risedronate 5 mg treatment, but decreased in the placebo group. Midshaft radius BMD did not change significantly in either treatment group. The difference in BMD between the risedronate 5 mg and placebo groups was significant at all skeletal sites (P < 0.05) except the midshaft radius at 1 year. The 2.5 mg dose also had a positive effect on BMD, although of a lesser magnitude than that seen with risedronate 5 mg. A significant reduction of 70% in vertebral fracture risk was observed in the risedronate 5 mg group compared with the placebo group (P= 0.01). Risedronate was efficacious in both men and women, irrespective of underlying disease and duration of corticosteroid therapy, and had a favorable safety profile, with a similar incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events in the placebo and active treatment groups. Daily treatment with risedronate 5 mg significantly increases BMD and decreases vertebral fracture risk in patients receiving moderate-to-high doses of corticosteroid therapy. Received: 11 October 1999 / Accepted: 1 May 2000 / Online publication: 27 July 2000     

Seven Years of Treatment with Risedronate in Women with Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

The effects of 7 years of risedronate treatment were evaluated in a second 2-year extension of a 3-year vertebral fracture study in women with osteoporosis. For the first 5 years of the study, women received risedronate 5 mg/day or placebo according to the original randomization, with maintenance of blinding. All the women who entered into the 6–7 years extension study received risedronate 5 mg/day. Endpoints included vertebral and nonvertebral fracture assessments, changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover, and bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. A total of 164 women (placebo/risedronate group, 81; risedronate group, 83) entered the 6–7 years extension study and 136 (83%) completed the study. Annualized incidence of new vertebral fractures during the 6–7 years was similar between the 2 treatment groups (3.8%). The incidence of vertebral fractures did not change in the 7-year risedronate group during the 6–7 years as compared to 4–5 years, while a significant reduction was observed in the placebo group that switched to risedronate treatment during years 6–7. The incidence of nonvertebral fractures was 7.4% and 6.0% in the placebo/risedronate and risedronate groups, respectively, during years 6–7. Urinary N-telopeptide decreased from baseline by 54% and 63% at 3 months and 7 years, respectively, in the risedronate group. The increases in BMD from baseline after 5 years of risedronate treatment were maintained or increased further during years 6–7; lumbar spine BMD after 5 and 7 years of risedronate treatment increased from baseline by 8.8% and 11.5%, respectively, for this extension study population. Risedronate was well tolerated and the occurrence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events was low. After 7 years of continuous risedronate treatment there were significant increases in BMD and decreases in bone turnover to within premenopausal levels and there was no indication of any loss of anti-fracture efficacy.     

Effects of intravenous zoledronic acid once yearly on bone remodeling and bone structure.

In a substudy of the HORIZON pivotal fracture trial, in which yearly intravenous zoledronic acid 5 mg was found to significantly reduce risk of various fracture types in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis, 152 patients underwent bone biopsy. Zoledronic acid reduced bone turnover by 63% and preserved bone structure and volume, with evidence of ongoing bone remodeling in 99% of biopsies obtained. INTRODUCTION: In the HORIZON pivotal fracture trial (PFT), enrolling 7,736 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis, three annual intravenous infusions of the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid (5 mg) significantly reduced morphometric vertebral, clinical vertebral, hip, and nonvertebral fractures by 70%, 77%, 41%, and 25%, respectively. Whereas 79% of patients received zoledronic acid/placebo only (stratum I, n = 6,113), 21% received concomitant treatment with other antiresorptive drugs, excluding other bisphosphonates, PTH, and strontium (stratum II, n = 1,652). MATERIALS AND METHODS: To determine effects on bone remodeling and bone architecture, iliac crest bone biopsies were obtained in 152 patients on active treatment or placebo at 3 yr after double tetracycline labeling. In five patients, only qualitative histology was performed, leaving 147 biopsy cores (79 on active treatment and 68 on placebo) for microCT analysis and histomorphometry. RESULTS: Analysis of bone structure by microCT revealed higher trabecular bone volume (BV/TV) in the zoledronic acid group (median, 16.6% versus 12.8%; p = 0.020). In addition, patients treated with zoledronic acid exhibited higher trabecular numbers (p = 0.008), decreased trabecular separation (p = 0.011), and a trend toward improvement in connectivity density (p = 0.062), all indicating better preservation of trabecular structure after treatment with zoledronic acid. Qualitative analysis revealed presence of tetracycline label in 81 of 82 biopsies from patients on zoledronic acid and all 70 biopsies from placebo patients, indicative of continued bone remodeling. No bone pathology was observed. Zoledronic acid induced a 63% median (71% mean) reduction of the activation frequency (Ac.f; p < 0.0001) and reduced mineralizing surface (MS/BS; p < 0.0001) and volume referent bone formation rate (BFR/BV) versus placebo, indicating reduced bone turnover. Mineral appositional rate was higher in the zoledronic acid group (p = 0.0002), suggesting improved osteoblast function compared with placebo. Mineralization lag time was similar in the two groups, whereas osteoid volume (OV/BV; p < 0.0001) and osteoid thickness (O.Th; p = 0.0094) were lower in zoledronic acid-treated patients, indicating normal osteoid formation and mineralization of newly formed bone. Concomitant administration of other antiresorptive osteoporosis therapies (e.g., raloxifene, tamoxifen, tibolone, ipriflavone) did not significantly alter the tissue level response to zoledronic acid. CONCLUSIONS: Annual dosing for 3 yr with zoledronic acid 5 mg intravenously resulted in a median 63% (mean, 71%) reduction of bone turnover and preservation of bone structure and mass without any signs of adynamic bone. Concomitant treatment with other osteoporosis therapies did not significantly affect the bone response to zoledronic acid.     

Use of matched historical controls to evaluate the anti-fracture efficacy of once-a-week risedronate

Placebo controls are essential to assess anti-fracture efficacy of new osteoporosis therapies, but inclusion of a placebo arm in a subsequent clinical trial may be limited by practical or ethical considerations; in these cases, use of an historical control may be appropriate. A recent active-controlled study of risedronate 35 mg once a week demonstrated that this regimen produces increases in bone mineral density (BMD) that are comparable to those seen with the risedronate 5 mg daily dose, which has proven anti-fracture efficacy. To assess the anti-fracture efficacy of this new regimen, we have analyzed the fracture data collected in an active controlled study of risedronate dosing regimens (the Once-a-Week study) using matched historical control data from previous placebo-controlled trials. Women in the Once-a-Week study were matched for age, years since menopause, BMD, and prevalent vertebral fracture status, with placebo patients in the Vertebral Efficacy of Risedronate Therapy (VERT) trials forming an historical placebo group. We also constructed an historical active treatment group from the 5 mg daily arm of the VERT trials for comparison with the 5 mg daily and 35 mg once weekly treatment groups in the Once-a-Week study. Data were obtained from the risedronate 5 mg daily group (n=480) and 35 mg once-a-week group (n=485) in the Once-a-Week study and historical control groups representing daily placebo patients (n=114, matched from 993) and risedronate 5 mg daily patients (n=120; matched from 990) in the VERT studies. Patients received calcium supplementation (1000 mg daily); vitamin D was given if baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels were low. Over 1 year, new vertebral fracture risk in the 35 mg once-a-week group was reduced by 77% relative to the historical placebo group (1.2% versus 5.0%; RR 0.23; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.91, P=0.018), similar to the 1-year risk reduction observed in the VERT trials of risedronate 5 mg daily (61-65%). The incidence of new vertebral fractures in the three active treatment groups was similar: 1.7% in the historical risedronate 5 mg group, 1.5% in the risedronate 5 mg daily group from the Once-a-Week study, and 1.2% in the 35 mg once-a-week group. Risedronate 35 mg once a week appears as effective as the 5 mg daily dose in reducing the risk of new vertebral fractures in the first year of treatment. The use of appropriate historical control data provides an approach to the assessment of fracture effects in osteoporosis trials for which placebo-controlled data are not available.     

Risedronate Increases Bone Density and Reduces Vertebral Fracture Risk Within One Year in Men on Corticosteroid Therapy

Limited information is available on the effect of bisphosphonates in men receiving corticosteroid therapy. We studied 184 men among the patients enrolled in two, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 1-year studies with similar protocols. The studies evaluated the effects of risedronate in patients beginning corticosteroid treatment at a dose of at least 7.5 mg per day of prednisone or equivalent (prevention study) or continuing long-term treatment of corticosteroid at that dose (treatment study). The men received either placebo or risedronate (2.5 mg or 5 mg) daily, along with calcium supplementation (500-1000 mg). Endpoints included differences in bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and femoral trochanter, assessment of vertebral fractures, changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover, and overall safety. In the treatment study, risedronate 5 mg significantly (P < 0.01) increased lumbar spine BMD by 4.8% at the lumbar spine, 2.1% at the femoral neck, and 2.6% at the femoral trochanter compared with baseline values. In the prevention study, bone loss was prevented with risedronate 5 mg; in the placebo group, BMD decreased significantly (P < 0.01) by 3.4%, 3.3%, and 3.4% in the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and trochanter, respectively, at 1 year. The differences between risedronate 5 mg and placebo groups were significant at all skeletal sites in the prevention study (P < 0.01) and at the lumbar spine in the treatment study (P < 0.001). The 2.5 mg dose also had a positive effect on BMD, although of a lesser magnitude than the 5 mg dose. When the data from the two studies were combined, the incidence of vertebral fractures decreased 82.4% (95% confidence interval, 36.6%-95.1%) in the pooled risedronate groups compared with placebo (P = 0.008). Risedronate was well tolerated in men, with a similar incidence of upper gastrointestinal adverse events in the placebo and treatment groups. Daily treatment with risedronate increases bone density and decreases vertebral fracture risk within 1 year in men receiving corticosteroid therapy.     

Effect of risedronate on bone in renal transplant recipients

Bisphosphonates may prevent or treat the bone loss promoted by the immunosuppressive regimens used in renal transplantation. Risedronate is a commonly used third-generation amino-bisphosphonate, but little is known about its effects on the bone health of renal transplant recipients. We randomly assigned 42 new living-donor kidney recipients to either 35 mg of risedronate weekly or placebo for 12 months. We obtained bone biopsies at the time of renal transplant and after 12 months of protocol treatment. Treatment with risedronate did not affect bone mineral density (BMD) in the overall cohort. In subgroup analyses, it tended to preserve BMD in female participants but did not significantly affect the BMD of male participants. Risedronate did associate with increased osteoid volume and trabecular thickness in male participants, however. There was no evidence for the development of adynamic bone disease. In summary, further study is needed before the use of prophylactic bisphosphonates to attenuate bone loss can be recommended in renal transplant recipients.     

Monthly dosing of 75 mg risedronate on 2 consecutive days a month: efficacy and safety results

SUMMARY: Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis received 75 mg risedronate on two consecutive days each month or 5 mg daily for 12 months. Changes in bone mineral density and bone turnover markers were similar between treatments. Risedronate 75 mg twice monthly was effective and safe suggesting a new, convenient dosing schedule. INTRODUCTION: Patients perceive less frequent dosing as being more convenient. This 2-year trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of a new monthly oral regimen of risedronate; 1 year results are presented here. METHODS: Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (n = 1229) were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment with 75 mg risedronate on two consecutive days each month (2CDM), or 5 mg daily. The primary endpoint was the percent change from baseline in lumbar spine (LS) bone mineral density (BMD) at month 12. Secondary efficacy was evaluated by mean percent changes from baseline in BMD in LS, total hip, trochanter, and femoral neck, and bone turnover markers (BTMs). RESULTS: Risedronate 75 mg 2CDM was non-inferior to 5 mg daily (treatment difference 0.21; 95% CI -0.19 to 0.62). Mean percent change in LS-BMD was 3.4% +/- 0.16 and 3.6% +/- 0.15 respectively. Mean percent changes in BMD and BTMs were significant and similar for both treatment groups. New vertebral fractures occurred in 1% of subjects with either treatment. Both treatments were generally well tolerated and safe. CONCLUSIONS: Risedronate 75 mg 2CDM was non-inferior in efficacy and did not show a difference in safety vs. 5 mg daily after 12 months, leading to a similar benefit.