Rapid detection of human parechoviruses in clinical samples by real-time PCR.

BACKGROUND: Human parechoviruses (HPeVs) have been associated with severe conditions such as neonatal sepsis and meningitis in young children. Rapid identification of an infectious agent in such serious conditions in these patients is essential for adequate decision making regarding treatment and hospital stay. OBJECTIVES: We have developed an HPeV specific real-time PCR assay based on the conserved 5'untranslated region. STUDY DESIGN: To determine the detection limit of the assay, serial dilutions of HPeV in vitro RNA were tested in a background of HPeV and EV RNA-negative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The specificity was tested by analyzing culture isolates of HPeV 1-6, enterovirus (EV) types, human rhinoviruses (HRVs) and hepatitis A virus (HAV). To establish diagnostic relevance, 522 CSF samples from children <5 years were tested. RESULTS: The detection limit of the assay was 75 copies of HPeV cDNA per reaction. The assay was highly specific for HPeV, detecting all HPeV types. We identified HPeV infections in CSF of 20 children (3.8%), all with severe conditions such as sepsis and meningitis. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that HPeV screening of paediatric clinical samples should be included in viral diagnostics in suspected cases of neonatal sepsis and meningitis.     

Clinical validation of a new real-time PCR assay for detection of enteroviruses and parechoviruses, and implications for diagnostic procedures.

BACKGROUND: Enteroviruses (EV) and parechoviruses (HPeV) are the most common causes of aseptic meningitis, encephalitis and sepsis-like syndrome in neonates. Detection by nucleic acid amplification methods improves patient management. OBJECTIVE: Development of a real-time PCR assay on a LightCycler for simultaneous detection of EV, HPeV and an internal control to monitor inhibition. STUDY DESIGN: We investigated the value of the new assay, prospectively, in a variety of samples from patients suspected of having viral meningitis or sepsis-like syndrome. RESULTS: The assay detected 64 EV serotypes and HPeV types 1-4. Of 186 patients, 63 (33.9%) were EV positive and 18 (9.7%) HPeV positive in one or more samples. In 43 of 159 feces and 6 of 57 throat samples viral culture and PCR were positive. With real-time PCR 27 extra EV and 19 HPeV positives were found. Blood and CSF were present from 33 patients. In 19 patients blood and CSF were positive, one was only positive in CSF, two were only positive in blood, 11 were negative. From 96 patients CSF and/or blood samples were tested and compared to results in throat and/or feces samples. Forty patients were EV-PCR and 14 HPeV-PCR positive in blood and/or CSF. All of these were confirmed by a positive PCR for the respective virus in feces and/or throat. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous detection of EV and HPeV with this two-step real-time PCR is specific, faster and more sensitive than viral culture. All systemic infections (blood or CSF positive) were confirmed in feces. Culture is no longer necessary for clinical diagnosis and should only be performed on PCR-positive samples to obtain isolates for typing purposes. Application of this assay is an important improvement for patient management since the outcome of the analysis is available within the time frame of clinical decision-making.     

Development, technical performance, and clinical evaluation of a NucliSens basic kit application for detection of enterovirus RNA in cerebrospinal fluid

The combination of nucleic acid sequence-based amplification and electrochemiluminescence detection was used to develop an internally controlled, highly sensitive and specific assay for the detection of enterovirus (EV) RNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The analytical performance of the assay was determined using both in vitro-transcribed EV RNAs and viral culture isolates. The sensitivity of the assay was 10 EV RNA copies per amplification reaction. The assay detected all enteroviral isolates tested with no cross-reactivity to 21 nonenteroviral species, including rhinovirus and parechovirus. The clinical performance of the assay was evaluated by testing 992 CSF specimens collected from adult and pediatric patients. NucliSens EV results from a subset of 327 CSF samples were compared to viral culture of nasopharyngeal specimens and rectal swabs (n = 195) and/or CSF (n = 212). Of the 212 CSF samples, 96 samples were positive by either the NucliSens EV assay (94/96; 97.9%) or culture (63/96; 65.6%), and 61/96 (63.5%) were positive by both methods. The inclusion of an EV-specific internal control monitored the entire process, including the efficiency of nucleic acid extraction, amplification, and detection. In total, only five blood-clotted CSF samples (0.5%) were inhibited. The NucliSens EV assay demonstrated superior sensitivity over viral culture (P < 0.001), excellent specificity, clear delineation of positive samples, and minimal amplification inhibition.     

无菌性脑膜炎和脑炎病人脑脊液肠道病毒RNA的检测及其临床意义

目的 检测肠道病毒（EV）在中枢神经系统感染中的致病情况,探讨检测EV感染的方法。方法 就用逆转录－聚合酶链反应（RT－PCR0和病毒培技术检测46例无菌性脑膜炎及脑炎病人脑脊液（CSF）标本。结果 RT－PCR方法敏感特异;46例无菌性脑膜炎和脑炎急性期CSF标本中,31例EV阳性（67．4％）,14例病毒培养阳性（26．1％）。统计结果显示,RT－PCR敏感性明显高于病毒培养。结论 EV是引起无菌性脑膜炎和脑炎的重要病原;RT－PCR快速敏感特异,简单易行,易于推广,是诊断EV感染的有效方法。     

Comparison of human parechovirus and enterovirus detection frequencies in cerebrospinal fluid samples collected over a 5-year period in edinburgh: HPeV type 3 identified as the most common picornavirus type

Human enteroviruses (EVs) and more recently parechoviruses (HPeVs) have been identified as the principal viral causes of neonatal sepsis-like disease and meningitis. The relative frequencies of specific EV and HPeV types were determined over a 5-year surveillance period using highly sensitive EV and HPeV PCR assays for screening 4,168 cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens collected from hospitalized individuals between 2005 and 2010 in Edinburgh. Positive CSF samples were typed by sequencing of VP1. From the 201 EV and 31 HPeV positive (uncultured) CSF samples on screening, a high proportion of available samples could be directly typed (176/182, 97%). Highest frequencies of EV infections occurred in young adults (n = 43; 8.6%) although a remarkably high proportion of positive samples (n = 98; 46%) were obtained from young infants (<3 months). HPeV infections were seen exclusively in children under the age of 3 months (31/1,105; 2.8%), and confined to spring on even-numbered years (22% in March 2006, 25% in April 2008, and 22% in March 2010). In contrast, EV infections were distributed widely across the years. Twenty different EV serotypes were detected; E9, E6, and CAV9 being found most frequently, whereas all but one HPeVs were type 3. Over this period, HPeV3 was identified as the most prevalent picornavirus type in CNS-related infections with similarly high incidences of EV infection frequencies in very young children. The highly sensitive virus typing methods applied in this study will assist further EV and HPeV screening of sepsis and meningitis cases as well as in future molecular epidemiological studies and population surveillance.     

Comparative detection of enterovirus RNA in cerebrospinal fluid: GeneXpert system vs. real-time RT-PCR assay

Enteroviruses (EVs) constitute the most common cause of aseptic meningitis in both children and adults. Molecular techniques have now been recognized as the reference standard for the diagnosis of EV infections, and the rapidity of the molecular diagnosis of EV meningitis has been shown to be a determining factor in the management of patients. The rapid documentation of EV RNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is key to adapting patient management and the therapeutic regimen. To shorten the time needed for virological documentation, we implemented EV RNA detection in two point-of-care (POC) laboratories. Here, we present the results of the POC detection of EV RNA with the Xpert EV kit on the GeneXpert integrated system, and a comparison with the real-time RT-PCR (rtRT-PCR) assay routinely used in the core virology laboratory. From January to September 2009, a total of 310 CSF samples were tested. The rtRT-PCR gave 81 positive, 225 negative and four ‘indeterminate’ results. POC results were concordant in 81.6% (253/310). Most of the discrepancies consisted of ‘indeterminate’ results at the POC level (16%). Calculated performances (excluding the indeterminate results) of the Xpert EV kit on the GeneXpert system in POC settings were 100%, 98.9%, 97.6% and 100% for Sensibility, Specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, respectively. Taken together, these results indicate that the implementation of POC detection of EV RNA can provide robust results in <4 h, and may have a significant impact on patient management, therapeutic attitude, and hospitalization costs.     

Comparison of an in-house real-time RT-PCR assay with a commercial assay for detection of enterovirus RNA in clinical samples

Molecular detection of enterovirus (EV) RNA based on PCR methods is a quicker and more sensitive approach than culture methods. At present, different PCR-based methods for EV RNA detection are available, but comparisons of results obtained according to the different approaches are limited. We evaluated an in-house real-time RT-PCR assay with a commercialized TaqMan real-time RT-PCR kit for detection of EV. Consecutive clinical specimens from paediatric patients less than 6 years old with clinical suspicion of EV infection were analyzed between July and November 2010. After RNA extraction, samples were amplified both by the real-time RT-PCR commercial assay and the in-house assay. A total of 19 of 132 patients (14.4%) involving 20 samples (14 plasma samples and 6 CSF) were positive in at least one of the two assays. The sensitivity of the in-house assay when the MutaPLATE® assay was used as a reference was 90% (IC 95%; 74.35–100) and the specificity was 100% (IC 95%; 99.63–100). Cts results of two methods were statistically correlated (r?=?0.774; P?=?0.01). In conclusion, these two real-time RT-PCR assays are rapid and easy methods for detection of EV.     

Evaluation of a rapid and completely automated real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assay for diagnosis of enteroviral meningitis

Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) for enterovirus RNA in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have emerged as the new gold standard for diagnosis of enteroviral meningitis, and their use can improve the management and decrease the costs for caring for children with enteroviral meningitis. The Xpert EV assay (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA) is a rapid, fully automated real-time PCR test for the detection of enterovirus RNA that was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for in vitro diagnostic use in March 2007. In this multicenter trial we established the clinical performance characteristics of the Xpert EV assay in patients presenting with meningitis symptoms relative to clinical truth. Clinical truth for enteroviral meningitis was defined as clinical evidence of meningitis, the absence of another detectable pathogen in CSF, and detection of enterovirus in CSF either by two reference NAATs or by viral culture. A total of 199 prospectively and 235 retrospectively collected specimens were eligible for inclusion in this study. The overall prevalence of enteroviral meningitis was 26.04%. The Xpert EV assay had a sensitivity of 94.69% (90% confidence interval [CI] = 89.79 to 97.66%), specificity of 100% (90% CI = 99.07 to 100%), positive predictive value of 100%, negative predictive value of 98.17, and an accuracy of 98.62% relative to clinical truth. The Xpert EV assay demonstrated a high degree of accuracy for diagnosis of enteroviral meningitis. The simplicity and on-demand capability of the Xpert EV assay should prove to be a valuable adjunct to the evaluation of suspected meningitis cases.     

Performance of the GeneXpert enterovirus assay for detection of enteroviral RNA in cerebrospinal fluid

BACKGROUND: The GeneXpert((R)) Dx System allows for automated extraction, processing, amplification and real-time detection of target nucleic acids. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of the Cepheid Xperttrade mark enterovirus (EV) assay for detection of EV RNA compared to a nucleic acid sequence based amplification (NASBA((R))) assay and a user-developed TaqMan((R)) RT-PCR assay. STUDY DESIGN: Assays were evaluated using a 12-member proficiency panel and up to 138 CSF specimens. Samples in which EV RNA was detected by two or more assays were considered true positives. RESULTS: The GeneXpert, NASBA, and TaqMan assays correctly identified 10, 8, and 7 of 12 proficiency panel members, respectively. For detection of EV RNA in CSF, the sensitivities of the GeneXpert, NASBA, and TaqMan were 100%, 87.5%, and 96%, respectively. There were no false positives. Two samples tested by GeneXpert and NASBA yielded indeterminate or invalid results and could not be resolved. CONCLUSIONS: The Xpert EV assay is a sensitive and specific method for detection of EV RNA in CSF specimens. The ease of use, random access capability, and minimal hands-on time with the automated GeneXpert system affords laboratories with little molecular diagnostics expertise an opportunity to complete a clinically useful testing within 2.5h.     

Evaluation of a one-tube RT-PCR system for detection of enteroviruses.

BACKGROUND: A highly sensitive PCR assay for early and rapid detection of enteroviral (EV) RNA in CSF is necessary to investigate the role of EV in acute neurological illnesses. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare two PCR protocols (Titan one-tube RT-PCR and random primed RT-PCR) for detection of enteroviral RNA in CSF. STUDY DESIGN: The PCR protocols were evaluated for lower limit of input detection using log dilutions of five stock EV strains and an isolate of enterovirus-71 in minimum essential medium and three EV stock strains in CSF. The tests were also applied on 77 CSF samples, 46 from patients with suspected acute EV neurological illness and 31 from 'disease controls'. RESULTS: Even though in the initial virus titration assays there was no statistically significant difference in the limit of input detection by Titan system and the random primed two-step PCR, the latter had a higher positivity rate when used on CSF samples from patients (20/46 vs. 10/46, P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Random primed RT-PCR assay is superior to Titan one-tube RT-PCR for detection of EV RNA in CSF.     

Enterovirus RNA shedding in the genital tract of childbearing-aged women living in Central Africa

Enteroviruses (EVs) (Picornaviridae) in the female genital tract may constitute possible sources of antenatal or perinatal infection. The presence of EV genomes in the acellular part of cervicovaginal lavages of 119 non-pregnant childbearing-aged African women was determined using a semiquantitative RT-PCR and hybridization detection assay. EV-specific cervicovaginal IgA and IgG antibodies were also detected by immunocapture ELISA assays. Of 119 CVS samples tested, only 10 (8%) were positive for the detection of EV RNA, demonstrating an genital shedding of EVs in African woman. EV-RNA positivity was not associated with the HIV serostatus or with the presence of semen traces in female genital secretion. The microwell hybridization assay of EV amplified RT-PCR products indicated the presence of low levels of EV genomes, ranging from 50 to 100 RNA copies per ml of genital fluids. EV-specific cervicovaginal IgA or IgG antibodies were detected only in two hemoglobin-positive cervicovaginal secretions samples from women without genital EVs. The lack of EV specific IgA or IgG antibody secretion by the cervicovaginal mucosa supported the hypothesis of genital shedding of EVs without ongoing viral replication in the female genital tract. In conclusion, the findings demonstrated the presence of EV genomes in nearly 10% of childbearing-aged women living in Central Africa, and provided the basis of possible antenatal or perinatal transmission of EV from mother-to-child.     

Evaluation of the roche AMPLICOR enterovirus PCR assay in the diagnosis of enteroviral central nervous system infections.

BACKGROUND: Enteroviruses cause a substantial number of cases of aseptic meningitis annually in the USA. While culture has been useful in the detection of patients with viral meningitis it is time-consuming and lacks sensitivity. Detection of viral nucleic acid in patient specimens has been demonstrated to improve enteroviral detection. OBJECTIVES: A research use only commercial amplification assay, the Roche AMPLICOR EV test, was compared to culture for the diagnosis of enteroviral meningoencephalitis. STUDY DESIGN: Four-hundred and sixty-five consecutive CSF samples sent prospectively for suspicion of enteroviral infection were evaluated by PCR and shell-vial culture. Clinical information and CSF analysis were used to resolve PCR positive, culture negative samples. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using resolved data. RESULTS: There were 138 samples which met the definition of a true positive. Of these culture detected 77 (sensitivity 55.8%) and PCR detected 136 (sensitivity 98.6%). PCR missed two culture positive samples. Upon repeat testing, these CSF samples were found to contain inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: The Roche AMPLICOR EV-PCR test was statistically more sensitive than culture (P<0.001) in the detection of enteroviruses in CSF in patients suspected of having enteroviral meningitis. This assay also has the advantage of a rapid turnaround time of 5-6 h compared to 3-5 days for culture.