Dietary advice, nutritional knowledge and attitudes towards nutrition in primary health care

The high priority of health promotion within primary health care in the UK is evidenced through the acceptance, by the primary health care team (PHCT), of a contractual responsibility for health promotion, including the provision of dietary advice. This study sought to investigate the level of advice given on dietary matters, the methods used to give this advice and the nutritional knowledge and attitudes towards nutrition of Sheffield PHCTs; general practitioners (GPs) and practice nurses (PNs) were compared. All active practices ( n = 100) on Sheffield Health Authority's GP practice lists were invited to participate. A total of 58 interviews in 46 practices were completed, representing a response rate of 46%. Information was collected using an interviewer-administered questionnaire. Data analysis was carried out using MINITAB (Minitab Inc., Pennsylvania, USA); differences between groups were tested using the x² test.
It was found that PNs gave dietary advice more frequently than GPs ( P <0.05). GPs were more likely ( P <0.05) to give verbal advice only, whereas PNs tended to take a dietary history and to give both written and verbal advice. GPs were less likely than PNs to give comprehensive advice for type II (maturity onset) diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia and obesity. There were appreciable gaps in the nutritional knowledge of both groups. The majority of GPs and PNs believed nutrition to be important in disease prevention and expressed a desire for nutritional teaching as part of their medical training. The primary health care team is in a prime position to give dietary advice, however, it is evident that there is a need for improved nutrition education and training in dietary counselling.     

Poor communication may impair optimal asthma care: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND: Despite asthma being primarily managed in general practice and primary care, there is little research into the issues and tools which may impact on managing poorly controlled asthma in this setting. OBJECTIVE: To explore the views of health care professionals (HCPs) towards asthma guidelines and self-management plans (SMPs) to identify why these are not used routinely in general practice. METHODS: Data from 54 HCPs [GPs and practice nurses (PNs)] in north-east Scotland were collected via qualitative interviews and focus groups. Participant views and experience of asthma guidelines and SMPs were explored. RESULTS: Participants had mainly positive attitudes towards guidelines and SMPs, although both were used only when deemed suitable by the individual. Suitability depended on individual patient issues (e.g. psychosocial factors, level of control) and/or professional issues (e.g. ease of use, time available, job roles). Patient issues were viewed as impacting on asthma control directly and, indirectly, as the main reason for not using guidelines or SMPs with a patient. HCPs reported lacking necessary communication skills for dealing with patient asthma control issues, particularly where these were non-medical. Professional and organizational issues such as training and communication were also perceived as impairing asthma management. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that guidelines are seen as providing the 'why' of helping asthma patients' self-manage but not the 'what to...' or 'how to...' communicate. Poor professional-patient communication seems largely to explain the poor uptake of SMPs and guideline use in general practice and primary care. This limitation is more obvious to professionals when they are working with patients with poorly controlled asthma. There is a need to identify key communication skills for effective professional-patient partnership in adult asthma management, and to develop robust strategies for effectively training GPs and PNs in enhancing these skills.     

Management of hepatitis B immunizations and blood exposure incidents in primary care

AIM: To investigate how well primary care health care workers, with no access to an occupational health service (OHS), have managed their hepatitis B immunizations and blood exposure incidents, compared with National Health Service Trust staff, with access to an OHS. METHOD: A questionnaire was sent to 78 general practitioners (GPs), 93 general practice nurses, 81 NHS Trust consultants and 88 NHS Trust community nurses, in the Airedale area of West Yorkshire in June 2001. RESULTS: The response rate was 80%. GPs were significantly less likely than consultants to have received a hepatitis B booster vaccination after their primary course (57 versus 80%, P < 0.009) and significantly less likely to have had their blood anti-HBs test checked after their last vaccination (74 versus 94%, P < 0.011). General practice nurses were significantly less likely to fill in a blood exposure incident form after an injury than community nurses (56 versus 91%, P < 0.006). Overall, the group with access to an OHS was significantly more likely to have received a hepatitis B booster (P < 0.036), have had a blood anti-HBs test after last vaccination (P < 0.010) and to have filled in a blood exposure incident form after last blood exposure (P < 0.033), than the group without access to an OHS. CONCLUSION: Any future OHS with responsibility for primary care, should consider calling in all GPs and general practice nurses for a review of their hepatitis immunity and for education regarding the management of blood exposure incidents.     

Occupational health in general practice in an industrial area of Singapore

The aim of this study was to estimate the caseload with regard to the proportion of work-related medical cases in factory workers and to survey knowledge of and attitudes to occupational medicine among doctors in an industrial area in Singapore. To this end, a self-administered questionnaire was given to 74 general practitioners in the industrial district of Jurong in Singapore. Overall, there was an 89.2% response rate. Thirty-three of the 66 respondents were males. Mean age was 40.8 years (range 27-64 years). Twenty-four (36%) had some postgraduate training in occupational medicine (GP-OM) while the rest did not (GP). The caseload for all doctors was similar with regard to the number of adult patients and, more specifically, the number of factory workers seen per day. The majority of doctors (76.6%) felt that <10% of factory workers seen had work-related problems. Most (70%) felt confident in dealing with the occupational problems that arose. However, a large percentage (78% of GPs, 45.8% of GP-OMs) felt that training in occupational medicine was inadequate. This is reflected in the knowledge questions, where GPs did not score as well as GP-OMs. It was concluded that GPs working in this industrial area see a good proportion of factory workers, in a fair number of cases for work-related problems. However, only a third of the GPs are qualified in occupational medicine. These factors highlight the need for more emphasis on occupational medicine training among general practitioners, especially those working in industrial areas.     

Is there value in routinely obtaining a report from the general practitioner as part of pre-entry health screening of students for nursing studies?

BACKGROUND: Reports from general practitioners (GPs) are requested on applicants for nurse training, but there is no published evidence of the merit of this practice. AIMS: To assess the benefit of GP report in health assessments of student nurse applicants. METHODS: An audit was made of information obtained by health declaration form (HDF), nurse's assessment, GP report and, when performed, a physician's assessment for each applicant. Agreement between the health questionnaire and GP report was analysed by kappa statistics. RESULTS: Of 254 applicants, 246 (97%) were declared 'fit to work', four (1.6%) were deemed 'fit with restrictions' and four (1.6%) were considered 'unfit to work'. The most common problems declared were psychiatric and skin problems. The agreement between health declaration and the information provided by GPs was classed as almost perfect for diabetes and only fair to moderate for all other measures. The reports provided additional information on problems not declared by applicants, but all of these were passive problems. The four unfit candidates all had psychiatric illness, but in all cases the occupational health assessment was sufficient to make this decision or to request further information. In the 'fit with restrictions' category, three of the four GP reports (75%) helped in correctly assigning the applicants to this category. In one of these eight cases a passive problem had not been declared. CONCLUSIONS: The additional information in GP reports does not affect the conclusion regarding fitness for training in most cases and does not provide sufficient information to merit it being sought routinely.     

Evaluation of an occupational health service for general practitioners and their staff in a primary care trust

BACKGROUND: An occupational health service was set up in 2002 for general practitioners (GPs) and their staff in a London primary care trust (PCT). The service was based on a needs assessment undertaken in the locality in 1998. AIMS: To evaluate awareness, usage and perceived helpfulness of the service amongst GPs and practice managers, and to ascertain current perceived priorities for what to include in the service. METHODS: Questionnaire survey sent postally and electronically to 199 named GPs and 69 practice managers in 78 practices in the PCT. RESULTS: Overall 119/268 (44%) responses were received from 54/78 practices (69%). Awareness of the existence of the service was high (76%), and although uptake had been poor, this was not related to a perception that the service was unlikely to be helpful. Almost all those who had used the service had found it helpful. Nineteen (16%) respondents asked for more information about the service. Advice on health and safety law and fitness for work assessments were the highest priorities and hepatitis B immunization lowest, as in the 1998 needs assessment. However, a discrepancy between GPs and practice managers with regard to the perceived relative importance of pre-employment health screening and counselling/stress management emerged. CONCLUSIONS: The service is valued by users but could be developed by exploring new ways to disseminate information about the service and deliver it.     

Clinical management of chlamydia in general practice: a survey of reported practice

BACKGROUND: Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common curable sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the UK. Prevalence of the infection in different health care settings has been found to be between 2% and 29% and diagnoses of the infection continue to rise significantly. It is estimated, however, that only 10% of all chlamydial infections are seen and treated in genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinics. Few data exist about the actual practice patterns of primary care providers in the management of chlamydia. The management of patients identified with the infection within this setting warrants attention. AIMS: To determine general practitioners' (GPs') and nurses' reported clinical practice in the management of genital chlamydial infection. To design a needs-based education guideline on the management of chlamydia in rural primary care. DESIGN: An anonymous, confidential, self-administered postal questionnaire was sent to all GPs and cervical cytology practice nurses in 84 practices in Dyfed Powys Health Authority (DPHA) area, Wales, UK. RESULTS: Following two mailings of the survey, responses were obtained from 75/84 practices (response rate 89%). A total of 130/307 GPs (response rate 42%) and 72/152 nurses (response rate 47%) in these practices responded. The data demonstrated that few tests for chlamydia are being carried out in general practice: 42% (55/130) of GPs and 54% (37/72) of nurses reported carrying out between one and four tests a month, and 35% (46/130) of GPs and 29% (21/72) of nurses reported performing less than one test a month. Very few positive results are being obtained. The majority of GPs (72%) and nurses (68%) routinely use the appropriate endocervical swab when testing for chlamydia, however 19% of GPs and 20% of nurses are using either an incorrect wooden-stemmed swab or are taking an inappropriate high vaginal swab. CONCLUSIONS: Few chlamydia tests are being performed in primary care in DPHA, Wales. Health professionals in general practice are in need of, and are in favour of, up-to-date training on all aspects of chlamydial identification and management in primary care. Attention needs to be focused upon resources and the paucity of GUM services and their access within the DPHA area.     

Current approaches to obesity management in UK Primary Care: the Counterweight Programme

Background/Aims Primary care is expected to develop strategies to manage obese patients as part of coronary heart disease and diabetes national service frameworks. Little is known about current management practices for obesity in this setting. The aim of this study is to examine current approaches to obesity management in UK primary care and to identify potential gaps in care. Method A total of 141 general practitioners (GPs) and 66 practice nurses (PNs) from 40 primary care practices participated in structured interviews to examine clinician self‐reported approaches to obesity management. Medical records were also reviewed for 100 randomly selected obese patients from each practice [body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg m^?2, n = 4000] to review rates of diet counselling, dietetic or obesity centre referrals, and use of anti‐obesity medication. Computerized medical records for the total practice population (n = 206 341, 18–75 years) were searched to examine the proportion of patients with a weight/BMI ever recorded. Results Eighty‐three per cent of GPs and 97% of PNs reported that they would raise weight as an issue with obese patients (P < 0.01). Few GPs (15%) reported spending up to 10 min in a consultation discussing weight‐related issues, compared with PNs (76%; P < 0.001). Over 18 months, practice‐based diet counselling (20%), dietetic (4%) and obesity centre (1%) referrals, and any anti‐obesity medication (2%) were recorded. BMI was recorded for 64.2% of patients and apparent prevalence of obesity was less than expected. Conclusion Obesity is under‐recognized in primary care even in these 40 practices with an interest in weight management. Weight management appears to be based on brief opportunistic intervention undertaken mainly by PNs. While clinicians report the use of external sources of support, few patients are referred, with practice‐based counselling being the most common intervention.     

Nutrition advice in primary care: evaluation of practice nurse nutrition training programmes

Primary health care teams (PHCT), including the practice nurse (PN), now have a significant role in health promotion in the UK, which includes the dissemination of advice relating to food and health. However, reports suggest there is a lack of nutritional knowledge among PHCT members and/or problems in communicating dietary advice effectively. Dorset Healthcare Trust employs two full-time primary care dietitians (PCDs). Their remit is to provide training in the field of nutrition to members of the PHCT, primarily PNs, in order to facilitate their role in delivering effective and consistent healthy eating advice. This small research study was designed to evaluate the impact of nutrition training from a primary care dietitian on the attitudes, practice and knowledge of practice nurses. There have been few studies or reports documenting this, which highlighted the need to evaluate the practice nurse training programmes in Dorset. Five practices of varying size were included in the study. Evaluation was undertaken by means of semi-structured interviews with one practice nurse from each practice conducted before and after training. In addition a questionnaire was used as a tool to assess perceived nutrition knowledge and confidence when giving dietary advice. True/false statements and a case history formed part of the questionnaire which was completed both pre- and post-training. Three 1-h training sessions covering the topics of obesity, diabetes mellitus and coronary heart disease were planned. They were presented by the primary care dietitian to each practice nurse together with other members of their PHCT over a 3-month period. The primary care dietitian collected feedback on each training session in order to monitor teaching methods and presentation skills. The study suggests that dietitian-led training sessions are well received by PNs and can have an impact on increasing or updating practice nurses» knowledge about diet, particularly where their initial knowledge was low.     

Improved communication between doctors and with managers would benefit professional integrity and reduce the occupational medicine workload

BACKGROUND: Professional expectations for communication skills are explicit. These skills are needed for professional integrity and personal morale. Nevertheless, occupational physicians see doctors as patients for whom communication among between doctors and with their managers are the principal cause of their presenting health problems. AIM: To describe the frameworks of professionalism in medicine and the duty to care for good communication; present issues surrounding competency in communication skills; identify health problems among doctors associated with poor communication; and consider roles of economic appraisal and preventive strategies. METHOD: A literature review identified key publications of professional expectations and requirements of doctors for their communication skills. Health problems among doctors associated with poor communication and presenting at least twice in a National Health Service (NHS) occupational health (OH) department during January-December 2002, were sought by manual retrieval of all doctor-patient records. The categories of communication difficulty were agreed in the focus group discussion of the presenting problems with occupational physicians. RESULTS: Nine categories of communication difficulties among doctors resulting in their presentation in OH departments with health problems were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Personal health problems caused by poor communication involve considerable time and potential litigation costs. Doctors need to be reminded of their responsibilities. Opportunity cost studies would help to strengthen an evidence base for the need of doctors to adhere to the professional requirements of good communication skills.     

Experiences and expectations of the new genetics in relation to familial risk of breast cancer: a comparison of the views of GPs and practice nurses

BACKGROUND: Advances in genetics may change the practice of medicine in many ways. Ascertaining practitioners' perceptions about managing the risk of familial breast cancer can give an insight into the current and expected impact on general practice to inform relevant education. Little is known about the practice nurses' (PNs) views of the new genetics in comparison with those of the GP. OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to describe and compare the views of GPs and PNs on their experiences and expectations of the new genetics in relation to managing familial risk of breast cancer. METHOD: A questionnaire, assessing views on the current and future impact of genetic advances in general and on the management of women with a familial risk of breast cancer, was sent to all GPs and PNs in the 66 practices of the Cambridge and Huntingdon Health Authority. RESULTS: There was a 69% response rate. The words 'cautious', 'mixed feelings', 'hopeful' and 'optimistic' were used most frequently in response to views on genetic advances, but PNs chose more positive words than GPs (P < 0.001). PNs were also more optimistic than GPs in relation to the future positive impact of genetics on practice (P < 0.0001). Sixty-one per cent of GPs and 45% of PNs agreed that genetic advances in relation to breast cancer were already affecting their work. A minority of practitioners had attended recent educational events in risk assessment for breast cancer, and only 8% of GPs reported a practice policy on familial breast cancer risk management. CONCLUSIONS: GPs and PNs show a cautious optimism in relation to advances in genetics, with PNs most optimistic. Many perceive that genetic advances in relation to breast cancer are already affecting their workloads, yet educational attendance and practice policies are lacking. Given PN involvement, multi-professional education may be appropriate. Education about risk management, including family history and genetics, might be better integrated into more general teaching on the prevention and management of breast cancer, than taught alone.     

Experiences and career intentions of general practice registrars from The Netherlands

For some years prospective general practitioners (GPs) from the Netherlands have come to Britain to complete their training. Not all report enjoying their time here, and many leave this country after training. The aim of this study was to examine reasons for coming to Britain, experiences, perceptions and career intentions. The sample consisted of 14 general practice registrars working in their practice year in Southern England. Data were collected through in-depth semistructured interviews and analysed by thematic qualitative analysis. The main reasons for training in this country were easier access, a quicker route to specialization and the quality of training provided. Most had positive professional and personal experiences and saw the British system of training GPs as up to date and supportive of their educational and professional needs. They highlighted some of the positive aspects of the British system, such as the emphasis on teamwork and collaboration with other primary care professionals. They did, however, point out problems and conflicts; for instance, they saw the health care system in Britain as more bureaucratic and as providing unequal access for different groups of the population. Despite their fear of litigation, which they saw as one of the drawbacks for British general practitioners, most looked favourably on the option of staying in or returning to this country if possible. All registrars valued their stay in Britain; however, personal circumstances often dictated a return to Holland. Our findings have implications for manpower planning and recruitment for general practice in both Britain and Holland.     

Which literature retrieval method is most effective for GPs?

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based medicine requires new skills of physicians, including literature searching. OBJECTIVE: To determine which literature retrieving method is most effective for GPs: the printed Index Medicus; Medline through Grateful Med; or Medline on CD-ROM. METHODS: The design was a randomized comparative study. In a continuing medical education course, three groups of health care professionals (87 GPs and 16 other health care professionals) used one of the literature retrieval methods to retrieve citations on four search topics related to general practice. For the analysis in pairs, we used the search results of the 75 participants who completed all four assignments. As outcome measures, we used precision, recall and an overall search quality score; we also had a post-course questionnaire on personal characteristics, experience with computers, handling medical literature and satisfaction with course instruction and search results. RESULTS: The recall and overall search quality scores in the Index Medicus groups (n = 32) were higher (P = <0.001) than those in the CD-ROM groups (n = 31). In addition, the search quality scores in the Grateful Med groups (n = 12) were higher (P < 0.003) than those in the CD-ROM groups. There were no differences in precision. CONCLUSION: In the period 1994-1997, the printed Index Medicus was the most effective literature retrieval method for GPs. For inexperienced GPs, there is a need for training in electronic literature retrieval methods.     

Emerging organisational models of primary healthcare and unmet needs for care: insights from a population-based survey in Quebec province

Background

Depression is common in coronary heart disease (CHD). Affected patients have an increased incidence of coronary symptoms and death. Little is known about how best to manage primary care patients with both CHD and depression. This study is part of the UPBEAT-UK programme of research and was designed to understand general practitioners' (GPs) and practice nurses' (PNs) views and experience of managing depression in CHD.

Methods

Individual in-depth interviews with 10 GPs and 12 PNs in South East London. Data were analysed using constant comparison.

Results

GPs and PNs had similar views. Distress following diagnosis or a cardiac event was considered to resolve spontaneously; if it endured or became severe it was treated as depression. GPs and PNs felt that psychosocial problems contributed to depression in patients with CHD. However, uncertainty was expressed as to their perceived role and responsibility in addressing these. In this respect, depression in patients with CHD was considered similar to depression in other patients and no coherent management approach specific for depression in CHD was identified. An individualised approach was favoured, but clinicians were unsure how to achieve this in the face of conflicting patient preferences and the treatment options they considered available.

Conclusions

GPs and PNs view depression in CHD similarly to depression uncomplicated by physical illness. However, uncertainty exists as to how best to manage depression associated psychosocial issues. Personalised interventions are needed which account for individual need and which enable and encourage clinicians and patients to make use of existing resources to address the psychosocial factors which contribute to depression.     

"Opening a can of worms": GP and practice nurse barriers to talking about sexual health in primary care

BACKGROUND: There is evidence that health professionals do not discuss sexually related issues in consultations as often as patients would like. Although primary care has been identified as the preferred place to seek treatment for sexual health concerns, little is known either of the factors that prevent GPs and practice nurses initiating such discussions or of how they feel communication in this area could be improved. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to identify barriers perceived by GPs and practice nurses to inhibit discussion of sexual health issues in primary care and explore strategies to improve communication in this area. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 GPs and 35 practice nurses recruited from diverse practices throughout Sheffield. RESULTS: The term 'can of worms' summarized participants' beliefs that sexually related issues are highly problematic within primary care because of their sensitivity, complexity and constraints of time and expertise. Particular barriers were identified to discussing sexual health with patients of the opposite gender, patients from Black and ethnic minority groups, middle-aged and older patients, and non-heterosexual patients. Potential strategies to improve communication about sexual health within primary care included training, providing patient information and expanding the role of the practice nurse; however, several limitations to these approaches were identified. CONCLUSION: GPs and practice nurses do not address sexual health issues proactively with patients, and this area warrants further attention if policy recommendations to expand the role of primary care within sexual health management are to be met.     

Early intervention for problem drinkers: readiness to participate among general practitioners and nurses in Swedish primary health care

An exploration was made of attitudes and practices of general practitioners (GPs) and nurses concerning early identification of, and intervention for, alcohol-related problems. Sixty-five GPs and 141 nurses in 19 primary health centres in a county in southern Sweden answered a 28-item questionnaire before implementation of an intervention programme. The questionnaire covered experiences with patients with alcohol-related health problems, knowledge and perceived capacity concerning early identification and intervention, attitudes towards the role of primary care staff in early identification and intervention and current intervention methods in use at the health centre. Self-reported frequency of asking about alcohol use was higher among GPs than nurses. Both groups reported more frequently asking about alcohol consumption in cases where they believed that the health status was influenced by alcohol. For both professions, knowledge and skills concerning identification were rated as better understood than that concerning intervention methods. Nurses rated their knowledge and skills less confidently than GPs. The overall attitude was fairly positive towards early identification and intervention, but nurses were more worried than GPs that patients would react negatively to questions about alcohol. Attitudes, self-rated capacity, and practice were related. The low level of early identification and intervention in primary care appears to be related more to insufficient practical skills than to attitudes. Nurses appear to be an unexploited resource, in need of training and support. Nurses may need to be convinced that an active role does not interfere with the nurse-patient relationship. Building teams of GPs and nurses in primary care might enhance the dissemination of alcohol prevention into regular practice.     

Training interventions for general practitioners providing an occupational health service in the British Army

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) working in the British Army, whether civilian or military, are responsible for providing a first line occupational health (OH) service in addition to their primary health care role. Despite the medical classification system being well established, previous publications have shown considerable inconsistency in the knowledge among GPs. AIM: The aim of this audit cycle was to test effectiveness of training interventions designed for GPs, providing the first line OH service. METHOD: The audit cycle was divided into three stages. The Stages I and III were audits examining the standard of OH records initiated by GPs during a 4-month period (pre- and post-training). The Stage II was a training intervention. Statistical significance was assessed with the chi-square test. RESULTS: The stage one audit showed a statistically significant standard difference between the medical boards initiated by civilian and military GPs. This gap was bridged and the overall standard of the OH records improved significantly after the training. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate training can enhance a first line OH service provided by GPs. The training must be reinforced at regular intervals. Both OH specialists and GPs can complement each other so as to identify, intervene and prevent work-related ill-health.     

The impact of educational interventions on primary health care workers' knowledge of occupational exposure to blood or body fluids

AIM: To assess the impact of educational interventions on primary health care workers' knowledge of management of occupational exposure to blood or body fluids. METHODS: Cluster-randomized trial of educational interventions in two National Health Service board areas in Scotland. Medical and dental practices were randomized to four groups; Group A, a control group of practices where staff received no intervention, Group B practices where staff received a flow chart regarding the management of blood and body fluid exposures, Group C received an e-mail alert containing the flow chart and Group D practices received an oral presentation of information in the flow chart. Staff knowledge was assessed on one occasion, following the educational intervention, using an anonymous postal questionnaire. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifteen medical and dental practices were approached and 114 practices participated (response rate 53%). A total of 1120 individual questionnaires were returned. Face to face training was the most effective intervention with four of five outcome measures showing better than expected knowledge. Seventy-seven percent of staff identified themselves as at risk of exposure to blood and body fluids. Twenty-one percent of staff believed they were not at risk of exposure to blood-borne viruses although potentially exposed and 16% of exposed staff had not been immunized against hepatitis B. Of the 856 'at risk' staff, 48% had not received training regarding blood-borne viruses. CONCLUSIONS: We found greater knowledge regarding management of exposures to blood and body fluids following face to face training than other educational interventions. There is a need for education of at risk primary health care workers.     

The interaction between general practitioners and occupational health professionals in relation to rehabilitation for work: a Delphi study

BACKGROUND: Anecdotally, communication between general practitioners (GPs) and occupational health professionals is poor and acts as a barrier to successful rehabilitation for work. It is not known how widely this view is held by the many stakeholders in rehabilitation for work, or how important the observation is in its effect. METHODS: A Delphi study was conducted by initial semi-structured telephone interview, followed by a three-round collation and feedback of opinion by e-mail. The 25 participants were identified by suggestion within the study process for their position as key informants within a wide range of stakeholders. RESULTS: The process generated a consensus statement which identifies the extremely important nature of rehabilitation for work, the crucial role by GPs, the central role of occupational health professionals in case management and the barrier represented by the often very poor communication between them. CONCLUSION: The way forward is to improve communication by mutual education and understanding and a team approach to rehabilitation strategy. This may be facilitated by the GPs who work in occupational health and disability assessment and the involvement of other health professionals to great benefit for all stakeholders.