Measurement of cervical flexor endurance following whiplash

Aim.?To investigate measurement properties of a practical test of cervical flexor endurance (CFE) in whiplash patients including inter-rater reliability, sensitivity to clinical change, criterion related validity against the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and discriminant validity for injured versus uninjured populations.

Methods.?Two samples were recruited, 81 whiplash patients, and a convenience sample of 160 subjects who were not seeking treatment and met criteria for normal pain and range of motion. CFE was measured using a stopwatch while the subject, in crook lying, held their head against gravity to fatigue.

Results.?Inter-rater reliability in whiplash patients was in a range considered ‘almost perfect’ (Intraclass Correlation?=?0.96). CFE had greater inter-subject variability than the NDI or range of motion in any of three planes. However, the effect size for improvement in CFE over treatment was as large as the effect sizes for all of those measures. In multivariate regression, CFE changes accounted for changes on the NDI better than the three ranges of motion. CFE discriminated whiplash patients who were within six months of injury (n?=?71) from age and gender matched normals with high effect size (ES?=?1.5).

Conclusions.?These findings provide evidence of reliability and validity for CFE measurement, and demonstrate that CFE detects clinical improvements. Variance on CFE emphasizes the need to consider inter-, and intra-subject standard deviations to interpret scores.     

The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity.

Injuries to the cervical spine, especially those involving the soft tissues, represent a significant source of chronic disability. Methods of assessment for such disability, especially those targeted at activities of daily living which are most affected by neck pain, are few in number. A modification of the Oswestry Low Back Pain Index was conducted producing a 10-item scaled questionnaire entitled the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Face validity was ensured through peer-review and patient feedback sessions. Test-retest reliability was conducted on an initial sample of 17 consecutive "whiplash"-injured patients in an outpatient clinic, resulting in good statistical significance (Pearson's r = 0.89, p less than or equal to .05). The alpha coefficients were calculated from a pool of questionnaires completed by 52 such subjects resulting in a total index alpha of 0.80, with all items having individual alpha scores above 0.75. Concurrent validity was assessed in two ways. First, on a smaller subset of 10 patients who completed a course of conservative care, the percentage of change on NDI scores before and after treatment was compared to visual analogue scale scores of percent of perceived improvement in activity levels. These scores correlated at 0.60. Secondly, in a larger subset of 30 subjects, NDI scores were compared to scores on the McGill Pain Questionnaire, with similar moderately high correlations (0.69-0.70). While the sample size of some of the analyses is somewhat small, this study demonstrated that the NDI achieved a high degree of reliability and internal consistency.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of the craniocervical flexion and isometric neck exercise compared in patients with chronic neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The present study compared the effects of neck isometric exercise (NIE) and craniocervical flexion exercise (CFE) on cervical lordosis, muscle endurance of cervical flexion, neck disability index (NDI), and active cervical range of motion (ACROM) in all three planes in patients with non-specific, chronic neck pain (CNP). Materials and Methods: Forty-one patients from a university hospital-based rehabilitation center were randomly assigned to an experimental (22 patients performing CFE) or control (19 patients performing NIE) group. All patients performed three 30-second repetitions of stretching exercises for the neck flexor, extensor, lateral flexor, and rotator as warm-up and cool-down exercises. The patients in the experimental group then underwent CFE 30 minutes/day, 3 times a week, for 8 weeks, while the control group underwent NIE. The main outcome measures were pain on visual analogue scale (VAS) and perceived disability based on the neck disability index (NDI). The secondary outcomes were cervical lordosis measured by an absolute rotation angle (ARA), muscle endurance of cervical flexion, and ACROM. Results: Both groups showed improved pain, NDI, endurance of the cervical flexor muscles, and ACROM in all three planes after 8 weeks (p < 0.001 for all). All these outcomes, except for the NDI, showed significantly greater improvements following CFE than following NIE (p < 0.05 for all). In particular, a significantly improved ARA of cervical lordosis was found following CFE but not following NIE (p < 0.05). Conclusions: CFE targeted at retraining the craniocervical flexor muscles was useful for improving or restoring the pain, cervical lordosis, and neck-related function disorders among patients with non-specific CNP.     

Validity of the neck disability index,Northwick Park neck pain questionnaire,and problem elicitation technique for measuring disability associated with whiplash-associated disorders

The Neck Disability Index (NDI) and Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) were developed to measure self-perceived disability from neck pain, including that which may arise from whiplash injury. However, there is little data specifically concerning their validity for whiplash-associated disorders (WAD). The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the NDI and NPQ as measures of outcome in WAD by comparing them to a patient preference questionnaire, the problem elicitation technique (PET), which identifies problems that are of most importance to the individual patient. A cross-sectional study of 71 patients with varying severity and duration of WAD were recruited from a private physiotherapy practice. All patients completed a standardized self-administered questionnaire that included demographic and clinical details as well as self-perceived pain and severity of symptoms, NDI and NPQ. A trained interviewer administered the PET. Construct validity of the disability measures was examined by determining their correlation with each other and with pain and severity of symptoms by calculating Pearson's correlation coefficients. Content validity of the NDI and NPQ was assessed by comparing the items of both questionnaires to the problems identified by the PET. Participants' mean age was 40.1 years (SD=14.3) and 59 were women (83.1%). Most patients were in WAD category I (n=23, 32.1%), or II (n=42, 59.2%). Mean NDI, NPQ, and PET scores were 40.7 (SD=17.0), 38.7 (SD=15.8), and 160.2 (SD=92.0, range 6.0-509.5), respectively. Correlations between the NDI and PET, NPQ and PET, and NDI and NPQ were r=0.57, 0.56 and 0.88, respectively. The PET identified an average of 7.7 problems per patient (SD=4.2, range 1-17 problems). Problems most commonly identified were work for wages (52.1%), fatigued during the day (50.7%), participation in sports (47.9%), depression (43.7%), drive a car (43.7%), socialize with friends (33.8%), sleep through the night (31.0%), frustration (31.0%), and anger (28.2%). Only three of these problems are included in the NDI (work, driving, and sleeping) and only four are included in the NPQ (work, driving, sleeping, and social activities). While both the NDI and NPQ include some problems that are common in patients with WAD, frequently identified problems, such as emotional and social items are absent. In contrast to the PET, neither instrument captures the full spectrum of disabilities judged to be important by the patient.     

Active movement measurements of the shoulder girdle in healthy subjects with goniometer and tape measure techniques: a study on reliability and validity

In response to the current need to develop objective measurement techniques for active movements of the shoulder girdle, this study had two goals: 1) to evaluate the reliability of the active range of motion (AROM) of shoulder girdle in elevation, protraction, and retraction with use of a goniometer and a tape measure and 2) to present the criterion-related validity of the reliable movements. Thirty healthy subjects performed two trials of each shoulder girdle AROM. They were assessed by two physical therapists, who used both evaluation techniques on two occasions. The generalizability theory was used to compute intratester (test-retest) and intertester reliability using dependability coefficients (phi) and standard errors of measurement (SEMs). The shoulder girdle movements were then evaluated with a movement analysis system (Optotrak 3020). The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) and paired t-tests were used to compare the results of clinical measurements with those of the movement analysis system. Overall, the reliability with the tape measure was good (phi = 0.78-0.91; SEM's = 0.7-1.1 cm) for the elevation motion. The goniometer was only reliable for intratester measures (phi = 0.78-0.79; SEM = 2.7 degrees) for the elevation motion. Retraction was reliable with the tape measure alone (phi = 0.76-0.84; SEM's = 0.5-0.7 cm). The criterion-related validity analysis revealed that measuring shoulder girdle elevation with the tape measure and goniometer, and retraction with the tape measure were not valid when evaluated against a gold standard, thus, both techniques have limitations in assessing true elevation and retraction measurements.     

Active movement measurements of the shoulder girdle in healthy subjects with goniometer and tape measure techniques: A study on reliability and validity

In response to the current need to develop objective measurement techniques for active movements of the shoulder girdle, this study had two goals: 1) to evaluate the reliability of the active range of motion (AROM) of shoulder girdle in elevation, protraction, and retraction with use of a goniometer and a tape measure and 2) to present the criterion-related validity of the reliable movements. Thirty healthy subjects performed two trials of each shoulder girdle AROM. They were assessed by two physical therapists, who used both evaluation techniques on two occasions. The generalizability theory was used to compute intratester (test-retest) and intertester reliability using dependability coefficients (?) and standard errors of measurement (SEMs). The shoulder girdle movements were then evaluated with a movement analysis system (Optotrak 3020). The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (r) and paired t-tests were used to compare the results of clinical measurements with those of the movement analysis system. Overall, the reliability with the tape measure was good (? = 0.78–0.91; SEM's = 0.7–1.1 cm) for the elevation motion. The goniometer was only reliable for intratester measures (? = 0.78–0.79; SEM = 2.7°) for the elevation motion. Retraction was reliable with the tape measure alone (? = 0.76–0.84; SEM's = 0.5–0.7 cm). The criterion-related validity analysis revealed that measuring shoulder girdle elevation with the tape measure and goniometer, and retraction with the tape measure were not valid when evaluated against a gold standard, thus, both techniques have limitations in assessing true elevation and retraction measurements.     

Reliability and Responsiveness of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Neck Disability to Physical Therapy: Comparison of the Copenhagen,Northwick Park,and Neck Bournemouth Questionnaires and the Neck Disability Index

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify the external and internal reliability and responsiveness of the validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of neck pain to a standardized regimen of physiotherapy administered acutely after mild whiplash injury using the clinically significant improvement components of the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) as the outcome measure.MethodsEighty-six patients with neck pain alone were referred for physiotherapy within 2 weeks of whiplash injury. They completed the Copenhagen, Northwick Park (NP), and Neck Bournemouth (NBQ) questionnaires and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) before starting and after treatment when they also completed the PGIC. Treatment comprised deep soft tissue massage, myofascial releases, muscle energy techniques, joint articulation and manipulation techniques, and a home exercise program. The duration of treatment was between 3 and 6 weeks. A PGIC of 6 or 7 was considered to be clinically significant improvement.ResultsThe external reliability of the PROMs was >0.7 and internal >0.87. All components of the PROMs contributed to the final score except headache in the Copenhagen and upper-limb dysesthesia in the NP. The most reliable questionnaire was the NBQ, which was significantly more responsive than the Copenhagen (P = .008). The NBQ was slightly more responsive than the NDI and NP. The NBQ and NDI were successfully completed more frequently than the NP and Copenhagen.ConclusionThe NP, NDI, and NBQ are all reliable and responsive measures of change after physiotherapy for neck pain after acute whiplash injury.     

Self-rated disability,fear-avoidance beliefs,nonorganic pain behaviors are important mediators of ranges of active motion in chronic whiplash patients

Abstract

Purpose: The influence of self-rated disability and fear-avoidance beliefs on whiplash sufferers in their performance of active ranges of motion has not been studied well. We undertook a cross-sectional study to determine this. Methods: Chronic whiplash subjects completed a standard clinical examination. They completed the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) and pain visual analog scale (VAS). Active ranges of motion (goniometer) and cervical nonorganic simulation signs (C-NOSS) were obtained by the examiner. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted on these scores. Results: Sixty-four subjects (37 female) with a mean age of 41.4 (SD 16.1) years completed all scores. NDI, pain VAS and C-NOSS correlated significantly with ROM. In a multivariable model, only the NDI score contributed significantly to the variance of the ROM scores (14%). Conclusion: As chronic whiplash sufferers perform ROM in a clinical examination, these ranges are importantly influenced by their self-perceived disability. Cervical nonorganic simulation signs can be helpful in distinguishing high from very high levels of disability and motion restriction. The lack of correlation with the TSK may present a challenge to the Fear Avoidance Model in whiplash.

• Implications for Rehabilitation

• Self-ratings of disability in chronic whiplash sufferers are influenced by their fear-avoidance beliefs.

• While self-ratings of disability are known to predict chronicity of whiplash, there is less known about how these ratings affect impairment assessment during recovery.

• This study shows that self-ratings of disability influence the presentation of impairment by chronic whiplash sufferers with respect to their ranges of neck motion.

• Signs of nonorganic behavior also influence ranges of motion and self-ratings of disability.

• These findings should be incorporated into the interpretation of impairment findings in chronic whiplash sufferers in order to improve management.

     

普拉提运动联合肌内效贴对慢性非特异性颈痛的临床疗效观察

目的：探究普拉提运动联合肌内效贴（KT）对慢性非特异性颈痛（CNNP）的临床疗效。方法：选取60例符合纳入标准的CNNP患者,采用随机数字表法将其分为普拉提组、KT组及联合组,每组20例。3组患者均接受健康宣教和物理因子治疗;普拉提组在此基础上增加普拉提运动;KT组增加KT治疗;联合组先接受KT治疗,结束后立即进行普拉提运动,持续治疗4周。治疗前、治疗后及治疗后1个月,采用视觉模拟评分（VAS）、颈椎功能障碍指数（NDI）和颈椎各方向活动度对患者颈部疼痛程度、功能障碍及活动度进行评定并比较。结果：与治疗前相比,3组患者治疗后与治疗后1个月时VAS、NDI评分明显降低,颈椎活动度明显增加（均P<0.05）。与治疗后相比,治疗后1个月3组患者的VAS、NDI评分均降低,颈椎活动度均增加（均P<0.05）。治疗后及治疗后1个月,普拉提组上述评分优于KT组,联合组优于普拉提组（均P<0.05）。结论：普拉提运动联合KT治疗可有效缓解CNNP患者的疼痛症状及改善其颈部功能障碍。     

Adaptation of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire to the Turkish population, its reliability and validity

The objective of this study was to adapt the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ) for use in Turkey, and to test its reliability and validity. Eighty patients with shoulder pain were included in the study. Pain severity at rest, with motion and during sleeping was assessed by using a numeric pain scale. The shoulder's active and passive range of motion were measured by a goniometer and recorded. The Constant-Murley scale was used for functional assessment. The Turkish version of the SDQ, which was adapted by using guidelines, was completed by the patients. To assess reproducibility, the SDQ was completed by 32 patients who did not improve 1 week later. The reliability of the adapted version was good, with high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.76) and test-retest reliability (Pearson's correlation coefficient=0.88). The Turkish version of the SDQ was found to have a moderate correlation with pain at rest, with motion and during sleeping. The Turkish version of the SDQ was found to be reliable and valid. The moderate correlation of the questionnaire with clinical parameters including pain shows its validity, but the questionnaire should be tested extensively for detecting changes within time, for use in the follow-up and clinical practice.     

Physical and psychological factors predict outcome following whiplash injury

Predictors of outcome following whiplash injury are limited to socio-demographic and symptomatic factors, which are not readily amenable to secondary and tertiary intervention. This prospective study investigated the predictive capacity of early measures of physical and psychological impairment on pain and disability 6 months following whiplash injury. Motor function (ROM; kinaesthetic sense; activity of the superficial neck flexors (EMG) during cranio-cervical flexion), quantitative sensory testing (pressure, thermal pain thresholds, brachial plexus provocation test), sympathetic vasoconstrictor responses and psychological distress (GHQ-28, TSK, IES) were measured in 76 acute whiplash participants. The outcome measure was Neck Disability Index scores at 6 months. Stepwise regression analysis was used to predict the final NDI score. Logistic regression analyses predicted membership to one of the three groups based on final NDI scores (<8 recovered, 10-28 mild pain and disability, >30 moderate/severe pain and disability). Higher initial NDI score (1.007-1.12), older age (1.03-1.23), cold hyperalgesia (1.05-1.58), and acute post-traumatic stress (1.03-1.2) predicted membership to the moderate/severe group. Additional variables associated with higher NDI scores at 6 months on stepwise regression analysis were: ROM loss and diminished sympathetic reactivity. Higher initial NDI score (1.03-1.28), greater psychological distress (GHQ-28) (1.04-1.28) and decreased ROM (1.03-1.25) predicted subjects with persistent milder symptoms from those who fully recovered. These results demonstrate that both physical and psychological factors play a role in recovery or non-recovery from whiplash injury. This may assist in the development of more relevant treatment methods for acute whiplash.     

Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the French version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand in shoulder disorders

We assessed the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the French short version of the scale Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand-Disability/Symptom (F-QuickDASH-D/S) in patients with shoulder disorders. We extracted QuickDASH item responses from the responses to the full-length DASH questionnaire completed by 153 patients. In addition to collecting demographic and clinical data, subjective assessment of activities of daily living (ADL), active range of motion (ROM), and measurement of abduction strength (strength) were recorded by use of the Constant scale. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.89. The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.94, which suggested excellent test-retest reliability. Correlation of the F-QuickDASH-D/S score with scores for F-DASH-D/S (r=0.96), handicap (r=0.79), ADL (r=-0.73), pain during activities (r=0.63), strength (r=-0.58), pain at rest (r=0.57) and ROM (r=-0.51) indicated good construct validity. Factor analysis identified 2 factors accounting for 59.1% of the variance. The responsiveness of F-QuickDASH-D/S was excellent, with standardized response mean and effect size values of 1.09 and 1.23, respectively. The F-QuickDASH-D/S has good reliability, construct validity and responsiveness. The strong correlation of its score with the full-length DASH-D/S scale score suggests that the QuickDASH-D/S could be the preferred scale because it is easier to use.     

Assessment and validation of prognostic models for poor functional recovery 12 months after whiplash injury: a multicentre inception cohort study

Uncertainty surrounds prognostic factors after whiplash injury. Previously we identified a prognostic model for 6-month pain-related disability in a cohort of 80 participants with acute whiplash. Predictors included initial disability, older age, decreased cold pain thresholds, decreased neck rotation movement, posttraumatic stress symptoms and decreased sympathetic vasoconstriction. The objective of this study was to externally validate this model. In a multicentre inception cohort study, 286 participants with acute whiplash (I, II or III) were assessed at <3 weeks and 12 months after injury. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) was the outcome. Observed and predicted NDI scores were generated using the published equation of the original model. Model discrimination between participants with no or mild disability from those with moderate to severe disability was examined by receiver operating characteristic curves. Initial NDI and cold pain threshold predicted current observed 12-month NDI scores (r(2) = 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.58). There was a significant site effect, and the estimated marginal mean ± SE of 12-month NDI for Iceland (27.6 ± 1.79%) was higher than the other 3 sites (Melbourne 11.2 ± 5.03%, Canada 16.4 ± 2.36%, Brisbane 16.8 ± 1.17%). After adjusting for site, age and Impact of Events Scale scores regained significance (r(2) = 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.48 to 0.64). The tested model was not precise in predicting NDI as a continuous variable. However, it found good accuracy to discriminate participants with moderate to severe disability at 12 months (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.84-0.94], P<.001) which is clinically useful.     

French translation and validation of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain

OBJECTIVE: To translate and assess the reliability and the construct validity of 3 functional disability scales for neck pain. DESIGN: Reliability and validity study. SETTING: Tertiary care teaching hospital and outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred one patients (mean age, 49 y). INTERVENTION: French translations were obtained by using the "translation-backward translation" method. Adaptations were made after a pilot study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Impairment outcome measures (visual analog scale [VAS] pain, neck range of motion, morning stiffness, score of neck sensitivity, radiologic score of Kellgren) and patients' perceived handicap (VAS) were recorded at the baseline visit. Three functional disability scales (Neck Disability Index [NDI], Neck Pain and Disability Scale [NPDS], Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire [NPQ]) were recorded twice, at baseline visit and 24 hours later. Reliability was assessed by using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method. Construct (convergent and divergent) validity was investigated by using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient and a factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: Test-retest was excellent for the NPDS and NDI (ICC =.91,.93, respectively) and good for the NPQ (ICC =.84). The Bland and Altman method showed no systematic trend. Expected convergent and divergent validity were observed only for the NPDS; 3 main factors were extracted by factor analysis and explained 78% of the cumulative variance. CONCLUSION: The 3 translated scales are valid, but the NPDS seems to have the best construct validity.     

The hemiplegic arm: interrater reliability and concurrent validity of passive range of motion measurements

PURPOSE: To assess whether our measurement protocol using two raters simultaneously yielded reliable passive range of motion measurements of the hemiplegic arm. Additionally, motion ranges were correlated to several factors to examine the concurrent validity of these measurements. METHOD: Two raters simultaneously assessed five arm motions at baseline, after five and ten weeks in respectively 18, 13 and 12 stroke patients. One tester made the passive movement and the other read the hydrogoniometer. Raters then switched roles. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients revealed high agreement between the raters with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranging between 0.84 and 0.99. Standard errors of measurement and smallest detectable differences were large for shoulder abduction. Significant correlations were found between shoulder external rotation and flexion. All arm motions correlated negatively to pain at the end range of these motions. Shoulder external rotation and flexion were significantly correlated to the time post stroke. Concurrent validity with Ashworth Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Barthel Index was limited. CONCLUSIONS: The current measurement protocol yielded high reliability indices and seems useful for further use. However, standard error of measurement and smallest detectable difference for shoulder abduction were high, implying the necessity to include a large sample size in future studies. Correlations revealed that restricted range of arm motions relate to the time post-stroke and coincide with pain.     

The Bournemouth Questionnaire for Neck Pain: Cross-cultural Adaptation,Reliability, and Validity of the Turkish Version

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was first to translate and culturally adapt the BQN, and then to investigate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the BQN in Turkish individuals with chronic neck pain.MethodsThe English version of the BQN was translated into Turkish with permission from its authors. That translation was assessed using 85 participants with a mean age of 46.75 years who had chronic neck pain. At the same time, the participants were assessed sociodemographically and with the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD). A test–retest procedure was performed with 62 participants who underwent a second assessment with the BQN within 24 hours of the first assessment, to test its reliability.ResultsInternal consistency was strong and all Cronbach alpha values were between 0.97 and 0.99. The BQN showed high test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ˃ 0.92) for all domains. The total mean (± standard deviation) scores for the 3 questionnaires were as follows: BQN, 30.9 (± 11.18); NPAD, 48.16 (± 12.93); NDI, 17.85 (± 6.29). The results of the Turkish version of the BQN illustrated adequate external construct validity and sensitivity. A Turkish translation of the test has not previously been available for chronic pain.ConclusionThe BQN was successfully translated and culturally adapted into Turkish. The reliability and validity were tested against the NPAD and the NDI. The Turkish version of the BQN is multidimensional, short, practical, and suitable for use with individuals with neck pain.     

Validity of the Neck Disability Index and Neck Pain and Disability Scale for measuring disability associated with chronic, non-traumatic neck pain

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the construct and content validity of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPAD) in patients with chronic, non-traumatic neck pain. Twenty patients (mean age=64.5 years) completed a patient-specific questionnaire, the Problem Elicitation Technique (PET), followed by the NDI and NPAD. Content validity was assessed by comparing the items of the NDI and NPAD with problems identified from the PET. Construct validity of the fixed-item questionnaires was examined by establishing the correlation with each other, and with the PET score. Eleven common problems were identified by patients through the PET, of which six were included in the NDI and seven included in the NPAD. The NDI and NPAD scores were strongly correlated (r=0.86, p<0.01), while the correlation between the PET and the fixed-item questionnaires was moderate (NDI: r=0.62, p<0.01; NPAD: r=0.71, p<0.01). Both the NDI and the NPAD include most of the functional problems common to this patient group, and display good content validity. The PET is better able to evaluate the problems specific to the individual patient and is therefore measuring a somewhat different construct to the fixed-item questionnaires.     

The modified rivermead mobility index: validity and reliability

PURPOSE: This paper presents the evaluation of the following psychometric properties of the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI): face/content validity, responsiveness, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. This mobility scale represents a further development of the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI). In its new form the scoring was adapted from a two-point to a six-point scale. The number of test items was reduced from fifteen to eight items in order to measure mobility-related items that physiotherapists consider being essential for demonstrating treatment effects in patients following a stroke. METHOD: A consensus exercise with forty-two physiotherapists attending a stroke care conference established face/content validity. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were examined by assessing thirty patients by two independent raters selected from a pool of eight physiotherapists in two different settings, an elderly care unit and a stroke rehabilitation unit. All patients were hospitalised and had experienced a stroke within the past six weeks. Responsiveness was examined by calculating the effect size statistic on the admission and discharge score of sixteen acute patients following stroke. RESULTS: The results showed that the modified RMI was: responsive to change (effect size = 1.15), stable when tested on two occasions (paired t-test = 0.732; p = 0.47), highly reliable between raters (ICC = 0.98; p < 0.001) with high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that when using the Modified RMI to assess patients in the early stages following stroke, similar results can be obtained by different raters, regardless of experience. However there needs to be a difference of more than 4.5 points (degree of measurement error at 95% confidence level) in the overall score to detect true changes in the patient's level of mobility.     

The modified Rivermead Mobility Index: validity and reliability

Purpose : This paper presents the evaluation of the following psychometric properties of the Modified Rivermead Mobility Index (MRMI): face/content validity, responsiveness, testretest reliability, inter-rater reliability and internal consistency. This mobility scale represents a further development of the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI). In its new form the scoring was adapted from a two-point to a six-point scale. The number of test items was reduced from fifteen to eight items in order to measure mobility-related items that physiotherapists consider being essential for demonstrating treatment effects in patients following a stroke. Method : A consensus exercise with forty-two physiotherapists attending a stroke care conference established face/content validity. Inter-rater and test-retest reliability were examined by assessing thirty patients by two independent raters selected from a pool of eight physiotherapists in two different settings, an elderly care unit and a stroke rehabilitation unit. All patients were hospitalised and had experienced a stroke within the past six weeks. Responsiveness was examined by calculating the effect size statistic on the admission and discharge score of sixteen acute patients following stroke. Results : The results showed that the modified RMI was: responsive to change (effect size = 1.15), stable when tested on two occasions (paired t-test = 0.732; p 0.47), highly reliable between raters (ICC = 0.98; p<0.001) with high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.93). Conclusions : These results suggest that when using the Modified RMI to assess patients in the early stages following stroke, similar results can be obtained by different raters, regardless of experience. However there needs to be a difference of more than 4.5 points (degree of measurement error at 95% confidence level) in the overall score to detect true changes in the patient's level of mobility.     

颈椎功能障碍指数量表的效度与信度研究

目的: 探讨颈椎功能障碍指数量表（NDI）的效度和信度，为临床应用提供客观依据。方法: 两组受试对象参加了测试，一组为病例组(43例)，另一组为对照组(20例)。两组对象在3d内独立完成NDI和视觉模拟评分法（VAS）评定2次，病例组同时用健康状况调查问卷（SF-36）评定。将NDI结果与VAS、SF-36作相关性检验来验证NDI的效度；对2次NDI结果作相关性分析来测试其重复测量信度。 结果: 两组受试对象的NDI总分和VAS评分高度相关，r=0.82-0.97 (P＜0.01)；病例组NDI总分与SF-36各项目分值比较，除精神健康（MH）一项外，均中度相关 r=-0.60—-0.78(P＜0.01)；两组受试对象的第一次和第二次NDI评定总积分和各项目积分间均高度相关，ICC=0.87—0.99(P＜0.01)；病例组和对照组NDI评分分别为37.2%±9.6%、4%±2.1%，两者间差异有显著性(P<0.01)。结论：NDI具有良好的效度和信度，可用于受试者的颈椎功能的评价。