Spectrum and frequencies of mutations in MSH2 and MLH1 identified in 1,721 German families suspected of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Mutations in DNA MMR genes, mainly MSH2 and MLH1, account for the majority of HNPCC, an autosomal dominant predisposition to colorectal cancer and other malignancies. The evaluation of many questions regarding HNPCC requires clinically and genetically well-characterized HNPCC patient cohorts of reasonable size. One main focus of this multicenter study is the evaluation of the mutation spectrum and mutation frequencies in a large HNPCC cohort in Germany; 1,721 unrelated patients, mainly of German descent, who met the Bethesda criteria were included in the study. In tumor samples of 1,377 patients, microsatellite analysis was successfully performed and the results were applied to select patients eligible for mutation analysis. In the patients meeting the strict Amsterdam criteria (AC) for HNPCC, 72% of the tumors exhibited high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) while only 37% of the tumors from patients fulfilling the less stringent criteria showed MSI-H; 454 index patients (406 MSI-H and 48 meeting the AC of whom no tumor samples were available) were screened for small mutations. In 134 index patients, a pathogenic MSH2 mutation, and in 118 patients, a pathogenic MLH1 mutation was identified (overall detection rate for pathogenic mutations 56%). One hundred sixty distinct mutations were detected, of which 86 are novel mutations. Noteworthy is that 2 mutations were over-represented in our patient series: MSH2,c.942+3A>T and MLH1,c.1489_1490insC, which account for 11% and 18% of the MSH2 and MLH1 mutations, respectively. A subset of 238 patients was screened for large genomic deletions. In 24 (10%) patients, a deletion was found. In 72 patients, only unspecified variants were found. Our findings demonstrate that preselection by microsatellite analysis substantially raises mutation detection rates in patients not meeting the AC. As a mutation detection strategy for German HNPCC patients, we recommend to start with screening for large genomic deletions and to continue by screening for common mutations in exon 5 of MSH2 and exon 13 of MLH1 before searching for small mutations in the remaining exons.     

Prevalence of germline mutations of MLH1 and MSH2 in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer families from Spain

HNPCC is an autosomal dominantly inherited cancer-susceptibility syndrome that confers an increased risk for colorectal cancer and endometrial cancer at a young age. It also entails an increased risk of a variety of other tumors, such as ovarian, gastric, uroepithelial and biliary tract cancers. The underlying pathogenic mutation lies in 1 of the 5 known DNA MMR genes (MSH2, MLH1, PMS1, PMS2 and MSH6). We screened a total of 140 individuals from 56 Spanish families with suspected HNPCC for mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes MLH1 and MSH2, using DGGE and direct DNA sequencing. Families were selected on the basis of a history of HNPCC-related tumors or the occurrence of other associated tumors in members besides the index case affected with colorectal cancer. We detected 14 definite pathogenic germline mutations, 9 in MLH1 and 5 in MSH2 in 13 unrelated families selected by the Amsterdam criteria and Bethesda guidelines (1 family carries 2 mutations) and 3 missense mutations in 3 unrelated families selected by the Amsterdam criteria. Among the 17 germline mutations noted in the Spanish cohort, 10 are novel, 7 in MLH1 and 3 in MSH2, perhaps demonstrating different mutational spectra in the Spanish population, where no founder mutation has been identified. Based on our results, we suggest that in the Spanish population not only HNPCC families fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria but also those following Bethesda guidelines should undergo genetic testing for MSH2 and MLH1 mutations.     

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: frequent occurrence of large genomic deletions in MSH2 and MLH1 genes

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is often caused by a deficiency in DNA mismatch repair. By using conventional methods of mutation analysis, point mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes MSH2 and MLH1 have been detected in up to 64% of patients suspected of HNPCC. However, large genomic deletions cannot be detected by these methods. In our study, we applied a semiquantitative multiplex PCR to detect the proportion of large deletions in patients meeting the Bethesda criteria whose tumours exhibited microsatellite instability (MSI). Of 368 unrelated patients, 180 exhibited MSI. In these patients, 68 disease-causing point mutations (38%) had previously been detected in the MSH2 and MLH1 genes by SSCP, heteroduplex analysis or DHPLC followed by direct sequencing. The remaining 112 patients (including 24 patients with rare missense or other unclarified variants) were examined for large deletions. We identified deletions in 19 patients (10.6%); 11/19 (58%) deletions were located in MSH2 and 8/19 (42%) in MLH1, respectively. The size of deletions ranged from 1 exon to a deletion of a whole gene. Five breakpoints of deletions were sequenced; Alu-repetitive elements were involved in all of them. In patients meeting the Amsterdam criteria the proportion of large deletions was 12.6%. A similar proportion of deletions was found in the group of patients with a positive family history for colorectal cancer and MSI tumours, not meeting the Amsterdam criteria. The results of our study suggest that large genomic deletions in both MSH2 and MLH1 genes play a considerable role in the pathogenesis of HNPCC and should be part of the routine HNPCC mutation detection protocols.     

Microsatellite instability and mutation analysis among southern Italian patients with colorectal carcinoma: detection of different alterations accounting for MLH1 and MSH2 inactivation in familial cases.

BACKGROUND: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is due to defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and has been detected at various rates in colorectal carcinoma (CRC). The role of MSI in colorectal tumorigenesis was assessed further in this study by both microsatellite analysis of two CRC subsets [unselected patients (n = 215) and patients <50 years of age (n = 95)], and mutation screening of the two major MMR genes MLH1 and MSH2 among familial CRC cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PCR-based microsatellite analysis was performed on paraffin-embedded tissues. In CRC families, MLH1/MSH2 mutation analysis and MLH1/MSH2 immunostaining were performed on germline DNA and MSI+ tumour tissues, respectively. RESULTS: The MSI+ phenotype was detected in 75 (24%) patients, with higher incidence in early-onset or proximally located tumours. Among 220 patients investigated for family cancer history, MSI frequency was markedly higher in familial [18/27 (67%)] than in sporadic [32/193 (17%)] cases. Three MLH1 and six MSH2 germline mutations were identified in 14 out of 36 (39%) CRC families. Prevalence of MLH1/MSH2 mutations in CRC families was significantly increased by the presence of: (i) fulfilled Amsterdam criteria; (ii) four or more CRCs; or (iii) one or more endometrial cancer. While MSH2 was found mostly mutated, almost all [8/9 (89%)] familial MSI+ cases with loss of the MLH1 protein were negative for MLH1 germline mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Both genetic (for MSH2) and gene-silencing (for MLH1) alterations seem to be involved in CRC pathogenesis.     

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer in endometrial cancer patients

Endometrial cancer is the second most common cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC). It has often been overlooked to explore the possibility of HNPCC in endometrial cancer patients. Our study was to investigate how many HNPCC patients existed among endometrial cancer patients. Among patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer at Seoul National University Hospital from 1996 to 2004, 113 patients were included, whose family history and clinical data could be obtained and tumor specimens were available for microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 proteins. There were 4 (3.5%) clinical HNPCC patients fulfilling the Amsterdam criteria II, and 2 (2/4, 50%) of them carried MSH2 germline mutations. There were also 8 (7.1%) suspected HNPCC (s-HNPCC) patients fulfilling the revised criteria for s-HNPCC, and one (1/8, 12.5%) of them revealed MLH1 germline mutation. In 101 patients, who were not clinical HNPCC or s-HNPCC, 11 patients showed both MSI-high and loss of expression of MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6 proteins, and 2 (2/11, 18.2%) of them showed MSH6 germline mutations. In 113 patients with endometrial cancer, we could find 5 (4.4%) HNPCC patients with MMR germline mutation and 2 (1.8%) clinical HNPCC patients without identified MMR gene mutation. Family history was critical in detecting 3 HNPCC patients with MMR germline mutation, and MSI testing with IHC staining for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 proteins was needed in the diagnosis of 2 HNPCC patients who were not clinical HNPCC or s-HNPCC, especially for MSH6 germline mutation.     

Immunohistochemical analysis of expression and allelotype of mismatch repair genes (hMLH1 and hMSH2) in bladder cancer

Mutation of human homologues of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes in tumours has been shown to be associated with the phenomenon of microsatellite instability (MSI). Several studies have reported the occurrence of MSI in bladder cancer, but evidence of involvement of MMR genes in the pathogenesis of this cancer is still unclear. We therefore utilized quantitative immunohistochemical (IHC) image analysis and PCR-based allelotype analysis to determine hMLH1 and hMSH2 genes alteration in a cohort of Egyptian bladder cancer samples. IHC analysis of 24 TCC and 12 SCC revealed marked- intra and intertumour heterogeneity in the levels of expression of the two MMR proteins. One TCC lost MLH1 expression and one lost MSH2, (1/24, 4%), and one SCC lost MSH2 (1/12, 8%). A large proportion of analysed tumours revealed a percentage positivity of less than 50% for MLH1 and MSH2 expression (44% and 69%, respectively). Complete loss of heterozygosity in three dinucleotide repeats lying within, or in close proximity to, hMLH1 and hMSH2 was rare (2/57, (4%) for MLH1; and 1/55, (2%) for MSH2), however allelic imbalance was detected in 11/57 (hMLH1) and 10/55 (hMSH2) at any of the informative microsatellite loci. These alterations in structure and expression of DNA MMR genes suggest their possible involvement in the tumorigenesis and/or progression of bladder cancer.     

Polymorphisms of MLH1 and MSH2 genes and the risk of lung cancer among never smokers

Mismatch repair (MMR) plays an important role in repairing nucleotide mismatches during DNA replication. Defects in MMR genes are associated with some sporadic tumors. MLH1 and MSH2 are two of the MMR genes. We conducted a case-control study to investigate the associations between the risk of lung cancer and genetic polymorphisms in the MLH1 and MSH2 genes. The SNP genotypes were determined in 730 lung cancer patients and 730 healthy controls that were frequency matched for the age, gender, and smoking status. Among the SNP polymorphisms, −93A>G (rs1800734), which is located in the promoter region of MLH1, was significantly associated with the risk of lung cancer. The GG genotype for MLH1 −93A>G was associated with a significantly increased risk of lung cancer compared with the AA genotype among the never-smoking group (adjusted OR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.10-2.44; P = 0.013). Consistently, the haplotype of MLH1 with one −93G risk allele was associated with the risk of lung cancer compared with the AA haplotype among the never-smoking group. Furthermore, the risk of MLH1 −93A>G polymorphism in the never-smoking group related to lung adenocarcinoma was modulated by environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure status, with a significant gene-ETS interaction (P = 0.042). No evidence was found of the association between MSH2 and the lung cancer risk. In conclusion, our data suggest that the MLH1 −93A>G polymorphism may contribute to the etiology of lung cancer, particularly in never smokers. This study also suggests that MLH1 −93A>G polymorphisms and ETS exposure have a role in the tumorigenesis of lung adenocarcinoma among never smokers.     

Impact of genomic stability on protein expression in endometrioid endometrial cancer

Background:

Genomic stability is one of the crucial prognostic factors for patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). The impact of genomic stability on the tumour tissue proteome of EEC is not yet well established.

Methods:

Tissue lysates of EEC, squamous cervical cancer (SCC), normal endometrium and squamous cervical epithelium were subjected to two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis and identification of proteins by MALDI TOF MS. Expression of selected proteins was analysed in independent samples by immunohistochemistry.

Results:

Diploid and aneuploid genomically unstable EEC displayed similar patterns of protein expression. This was in contrast to diploid stable EEC, which displayed a protein expression profile similar to normal endometrium. Approximately 10% of the differentially expressed proteins in EEC were specific for this type of cancer with differential expression of other proteins observed in other types of malignancy (e.g., SCC). Selected proteins differentially expressed in 2D gels of EEC were further analysed in an EEC precursor lesion, that is, atypical hyperplasia of endometrium, and showed increased expression of CLIC1, EIF4A1 and PRDX6 and decreased expression of ENO1, ANXA4, EMD and Ku70.

Conclusion:

Protein expression in diploid and aneuploid genomically unstable EEC is different from the expression profile of proteins in diploid genomically stable EEC. We showed that changes in expression of proteins typical for EEC could already be detected in precursor lesions, that is, atypical hyperplasia of endometrium, highlighting their clinical potential for improving early diagnostics of EEC.     

Surveillance for endometrial cancer in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome

The estimated lifetime risk for endometrial carcinoma (EC) in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC) is 32-60%, thus supporting surveillance. The survival rate of EC patients is, however, favourable questioning the need for surveillance. Yet, the effectiveness of gynecological surveillance remains to be shown. The 2 previously published studies were based on transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) alone. Intrauterine biopsy has not been tested in surveillance for EC in HNPCC families. The effect of gynecological surveillance was evaluated among 175 Finnish mutation carriers. During 759 person years at risk, there were 503 surveillance visits including TVUS and intrauterine biopsy of endometrium at 94% and 74% of the visits, respectively. EC occurred in 14 cases, 11 of which were diagnosed by surveillance, 8 by intrauterine biopsies. TVUS indicated only 4 EC patients but missed 6 other cases. Intrauterine sampling detected 14 additional cases of potentially premalignant hyperplasia. The stage distribution and survival tended to be more favorable in the 14 EC cases of the surveilled group (no deaths) than in the group of 83 symptomatic mutation carriers of whom 6 died of EC, but with no statistical significance. Four cases of ovarian cancer occurred but none was detected by surveillance in TVUS examinations. In conclusion, EC surveillance in HNPCC seems more effective with endometrial biopsies than with TVUS alone. A definite improvement in survival remains to be shown. The detection of early cancer stages and premalignant lesions offers the opportunity to avoid extensive adjuvant treatment.     

Microsatellite instability and immunohistochemical analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 in normal endometrium, endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer from a hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patient

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC)-related endometrial cancer is associated with mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes. However, chronological changes of these genes in the endometrium have not been studied in women from HNPCC families. Tissue samples of normal endometrium, endometrial hyperplasia without atypia and endometrial cancer were collected at different times from a 41-year-old Japanese woman with a family history of HNPCC. Combined microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemical analysis of MLH1 and MSH2 predicted the presence of a mutation in MSH2 when she had endometrial hyperplasia without atypia 7 months before the diagnosis of endometrial cancer. Endometrial hyperplasia without atypia may indicate an early development of endometrial cancer in women from HNPCC families.     

CDH1和MLH1蛋白在甲状腺癌中的表达及临床意义

背景与目的:上皮型钙黏着蛋白1(cadherin 1,CDH1)和Mut L同源基因1(mut L homolog 1,MLH1)在不同肿瘤的发生、发展中起一定作用。本文旨在探讨CDH1和MLH1在甲状腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义。方法:用免疫组织化学SP法检测甲状腺癌(65例)、甲状腺腺瘤(24例)、桥本甲状腺炎(15例)、结节性甲状腺肿(7例)和癌旁正常组织(12例)中CDH1蛋白的表达,以及甲状腺癌(56例)、甲状腺腺瘤(17例)、桥本氏甲状腺炎(13例)、结节性甲状腺肿(8例)和癌旁正常组织(12例)中MLH1蛋白的表达,结合临床病理因素进行分析。结果:CDH1蛋白在癌旁正常组织(83.33%)、结节性甲状腺肿(100%)、桥本甲状腺炎(93.33%)、甲状腺腺瘤(79.17%)及甲状腺癌(47.69%)中表达水平基本呈降低趋势。MLH1蛋白在癌旁正常组织(83.33%)、结节性甲状腺肿(75%)、桥本氏甲状腺炎(76.92%)、甲状腺腺瘤(52.94%)及甲状腺癌(42.86%)中的表达水平呈降低趋势。CDH1和MLH1蛋白表达水平在甲状腺病变中表达差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随着甲状腺病变恶性程度升高呈降低趋势,同时CDH1蛋白表达水平降低与PTC和FTC的临床分期、淋巴结转移密切相关。在甲状腺癌中,CDH1和MLH1蛋白表达水平呈正相关(P<0.05)。结论:CDH1、MLH1蛋白低表达可能与甲状腺癌发生、转移有关;在甲状腺癌中,CDH1与MLH1蛋白表达之间有一定的相关性。     

MLH1 polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta-analysis based on 33 case-control studies

Objective: Cumulative evidence suggests that MLH1, the key component in the mismatch pathway, plays an important role in human cancers. Two potential functional polymorphisms (-93G>A and I219V) of MLH1 have been implicated in cancer risk. The aim of this meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence for associations. Methods: Eligible studies were identified by searching the electronic literature PubMed, ScienceDirect and Embase databases for relevant reports and bibliographies. Studies were included if of case-control design investigating MLH1 polymorphisms (-93G>A and I219V) and cancer risk with sufficient raw data for analysis. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to evaluate the strength of associations. Results: Our meta-analysis from 33 published case-control studies showed the variant A allele of -93G>A polymorphism to be associated with increased risk in all genetic models (AA vs. GG: OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.03-1.44), especially among non-Asians (AA vs. GG: OR = 1.28, 95% CI: 1.04-1.58). For the I219V polymorphism, however, there was no main effect associated with overall cancer risk in any genetic model. Conclusions: The meta-analysis suggested that the MLH1 -93G>A polymorphism may be a biomarker of cancer susceptibility. Large sample association studies and assessment of gene-to-gene as well as gene-to-environment interactions are required to confirm these findings.     

Genotype and phenotype in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer: a study of families with different vs. shared predisposing mutations

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is a multi-organ cancer syndrome associated with heritable mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes, particularly MLH1 (MutL Homologue 1) and MSH2 (MutS Homologue 2). We took advantage of the unique characteristics of the Finnish HNPCC families to assess genotype-phenotype correlations in this disorder. We studied 295 mutation carriers (10 mutations in MLH1 and 3 in MSH2) segregating in 55 families. In addition to the comparison of families with different mutations, the enrichment of two MLH1 mutations, one affecting exon 16 (29 families, 186 individuals) and another one affecting exon 6 (10 families, 45 individuals) allowed the comparison of kindreds with identical predisposing mutations. Extracolonic cancers were more common in MSH2 than MLH1 mutation carriers, with the ratios of 0.48 and 0.64, respectively, of colorectal cancer to all cancers (P = 0.076). Within MLH1, two mutations affecting only the amino terminal portion showed a significant association with late onset of cancer as compared to the remaining mutations. Importantly, families with the MLH1 exon 16 mutation displayed significant variation (P = 0.012) in the age at onset of colon cancer, despite shared predisposition. We conclude that even though characteristics of the inherited mutations may explain part of the observed clinical variation, other factors have a significant impact on HNPCC phenotype determination.