原发性肝癌中 KRAS 及 BRAF 基因突变及其临床意义

目的：检测原发性肝癌患者血浆中的 KRAS 与 BRAF 基因突变机率及特征,研究与疾病进展的相关性及对治疗的意义。方法：收集肝癌患者血液（51例）,观察组25例,为肝癌伴肝外转移患者;对照组26例,为病灶局限于肝脏的肝癌患者。所有的患者抽取外周血10ml,从血样中游离 DNA,采用人类 KRAS ／NRAS 基因突变联合检测试剂盒及人类 BRAF 基因 V600E 突变检测试剂盒分别对 KRAS 基因和 BRAF 基因突变进行检测,并分析基因突变机率及与其突变特征。结果：51例肝癌患者中,伴肝外转移患者 KRAS 基因突变率（24％,6／25）明显高于无肝外转移患者 KRAS 基因突变率（0％,0／26;P ＜0．05）;肝癌患者中 BRAF 基因突变率为0％（0／51）。结论：本研究表明肝癌患者 KRAS 基因会发生明显的突变,且肝癌伴肝外转移患者,KRAS基因突变频率明显增加。未检测出 BRAF 基因突变或 BRAF 基因突变率较低。     

KRAS and BRAF mutations are prognostic biomarkers in patients undergoing lung metastasectomy of colorectal cancer

Background:

We evaluated KRAS (mKRAS (mutant KRAS)) and BRAF (mBRAF (mutant BRAF)) mutations to determine their prognostic potential in assessing patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) for lung metastasectomy.

Methods:

Data were reviewed from 180 patients with a diagnosis of CRC who underwent a lung metastasectomy between January 1998 and December 2011.

Results:

Molecular analysis revealed mKRAS in 93 patients (51.7%), mBRAF in 19 patients (10.6%). In univariate analyses, overall survival (OS) was influenced by thoracic nodal status (median OS: 98 months for pN−, 27 months for pN+, P<0.0001), multiple thoracic metastases (75 months vs 101 months, P=0.008) or a history of liver metastases (94 months vs 101 months, P=0.04). mBRAF had a significantly worse OS than mKRAS and wild type (WT) (P<0.0001). The 5-year OS was 0% for mBRAF, 44% for mKRAS and 100% for WT, with corresponding median OS of 15, 55 and 98 months, respectively (P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, WT BRAF (HR: 0.005 (95% CI: 0.001–0.02), P<0.0001) and WT KRAS (HR: 0.04 (95% CI: 0.02–0.1), P<0.0001) had a significant impact on OS.

Conclusions:

mKRAS and mBRAF seem to be prognostic factors in patients with CRC who undergo lung metastasectomy. Further studies are necessary.     

结直肠癌组织中KRAS和BRAF基因突变与临床病理特征及预后的关系

目的:探讨结直肠癌组织中KRAS和BRAF基因突变与临床病理和预后的关系.方法:采用扩增阻滞突变系统(ARMS)方法对134例结直肠癌组织进行回顾性分析.结果:134例CRC组织中KRAS基因突变率49.3％(66/134),第2外显子突变率42.5％(57/134),其中12及13密码子突变率分别为35.1％(47/...     

Clinicopathological features of lung adenocarcinoma with KRAS mutations

BACKGROUND:

KRAS and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are thought to play an important role in the carcinogenesis of lung adenocarcinoma. However, clinicopathological findings of KRAS mutated adenocarcinoma cases have not yet been fully clarified. The authors analyzed the relationship between the KRAS mutation and corresponding clinicopathological findings, focusing on nonmucinous and mucinous bronchioloalveolar elements.

METHODS:

EGFR and KRAS mutations were detected in DNA samples extracted from 182 surgically resected tissues of lung adenocarcinomas by the Smart Amplification Process. The relations between gene mutation status and clinicopathological features were analyzed. All adenocarcinoma cases were divided into bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features, and adenocarcinoma without BAC components (non‐BAC). BAC/adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features tumors were further assessed for the presence of mucinous features.

RESULTS:

EGFR and KRAS mutations were found in 76 and 30 cases, respectively. In the KRAS mutant group, BAC/adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features was found in 22 cases, which included 10 nonmucinous and 12 mucinous tumors. Of 19 cases with mucinous BAC/adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features, KRAS mutations were detected in 12, but no EGFR mutation was detected. In the KRAS mutant group, BAC/adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features had significantly earlier pathological stages and more favorable prognoses than did non‐BAC. Mucinous BAC/adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features showed less smoking history than did nonmucinous BAC/adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features and non‐BAC. Furthermore, transversion type KRAS mutations were more common in non‐BAC.

CONCLUSIONS:

KRAS mutated adenocarcinomas can be divided into BAC/adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features and non‐BAC types. Non‐BAC adenocarcinoma is related to smoking history and has a poor prognosis. BAC/adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features adenocarcinoma, however, has a more favorable prognosis, and mucinous BAC/adenocarcinoma with bronchioloalveolar features has little relationship to smoking history. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

KRAS、BRAF基因突变在大肠锯齿状病变中的临床应用

目的研究KRAS、BRAF基因突变在大肠锯齿状病变中的临床应用。方法选取100例大肠锯齿状病例经切除术后的石蜡标本进行研究。应用直接测序技术对KRAS、BRAF基因的突变进行检测分析。结果大肠锯齿状病变中KRAS基因突变率为40.00%,BRAF基因突变率为6.67%。所有大肠锯齿状病变患者中有40例检出KRAS基因突变,突变率为40.00%,其中KRAS基因12、13密码子突变率分别为30.00%以及10.00%。KRAS基因突变率与患者性别、年龄、病变部位、分化程度以及淋巴结转移等临床病理特征均无关(P>0.05)。BRAF基因突变在>65岁患者以及大肠近端情况较多见(P<0.05)。结论随着KRAS、BRAF基因突变的研究不断深入,对指导临床进行随访及药物治疗预后的判定具有重要的临床意义。     

Mutant allele-specific imbalance modulates prognostic impact of KRAS mutations in colorectal adenocarcinoma and is associated with worse overall survival

The prognostic impact of distinct KRAS mutations in colorectal carcinomas is not fully characterized. We hypothesized that the prognostic impact of KRAS mutations is modulated by KRAS mutant allele-specific imbalance (MASI). KRAS MASI was assessed by sequencing electropherograms in KRAS-mutated colorectal carcinomas (N = 394, prospectively tested). The mechanism of KRAS MASI was studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH; N = 50). FISH showed that KRAS MASI developed by chromosome 12 hyperploidy (9/18, 50%) or KRAS amplification (1/18, 5.5%). KRAS MASI was more common in tumors with KRAS codon 13 than with codon 12 mutations [24/81, 30% vs. 54/313, 17%; odds ratio (OR), 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.2-3.5; p = 0.01]. KRAS MASI was correlated with overall survival (N = 358, median follow-up = 21 months). In a multivariate analysis, KRAS codon 13 MASI was an independent adverse prognostic factor (compared to codon 13 mutants without MASI combined with all codon 12 mutants; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.2, 95% CI: 1.2-3.9; p = 0.01). KRAS MASI arises through chromosome 12 hyperploidy or KRAS amplification and, when affects KRAS codon 13, is associated with worse overall survival.     

Efficacy of first-line systemic treatment in correlation with BRAF V600E and different KRAS mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer - a single institution retrospective analysis

Background

KRAS mutation status in codons 12 and 13 is recognized as a predictive factor for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies. Despite having a wild type KRAS (wt-KRAS), not all patients with wt-KRAS respond to anti-EGFR antibody treatment. Additional mechanisms of resistance may activate mutations of the other main EGFR effectors pathway. Consequently, other molecular markers in colorectal cancer are needed to be evaluated to predict the response to therapy.

Patients and methods

In this retrospective study, objective responses (OR), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) were analyzed in 176 metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with first-line chemotherapy in combination with monoclonal antibodies in respect of KRAS status in codons 12 and 13 and BRAF mutational status.

Results

The KRAS mutations were found in 63 patients (35.8 %), the KRAS mutation in codon 12 in 53 patients (30.1%) and the KRAS mutation in codon 13 in 10 patients (5.7%). The BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 13 of 176 patients (7.4%). In the subgroup of mCRC patients having wt-KRAS and wild type BRAF (wt-BRAF), the objective response rates were higher (OR 54.0% ,CR 14.7%, PR 39.3%) than in the patients with wt-KRAS and mt-BRAF (OR 38.5%,CR 15.4%, PR 23.1%), the difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.378). Median OS in patients with wt-KRAS wt-BRAF, and in patients with wt-KRAS mt-BRAF, was 107.4 months and 45 months, respectively. The difference was statistically significant (p= 0.042). TTP in patients with wt-KRAS wt-BRAF, and in patients with wt-KRAS mt-BRAF, was 16 months and 12 months, respectively. The difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.558).

Conclusions

Patients with BRAF V600E mutation have statistically significantly worse prognosis than the patients with wt-BRAF and progress earlier during treatment. The definitive role of the BRAF V600E mutation as a prognostic and predictive factor for the response to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies needs to be analyzed in large prospective clinical studies.     

Wild-type KRAS and BRAF could predict response to Cetuximab in Chinese colorectal cancer patients

Objective  

To analyze the relationship between KRAS, BRAF mutations and the response to Cetuximab in Chinese colorectal cancer patients.     

RASSF1A hypermethylation and its inverse correlation with BRAF and/or KRAS mutations in MSI-associated endometrial carcinoma

Both hypermethylation of the tumor suppressor gene RASSF1A and activating mutations of the KRAS and/or BRAF gene have been reported in a variety of human cancers. To investigate these epigenetic and genetic alterations in endometrial carcinoma (EC), we examined their frequency in 4 uterine EC cell lines and in 75 sporadic primary ECs. Using methylation specific PCR, we found RASSF1A methylation in 25 of 75 (33.3%) ECs. RASSF1A methylation was significantly associated with microsatellite instability (MSI, p < 0.001) and also with hMLH1 methylation (p < 0.001). KRAS mutations were detected in 14 of 75 (18.7%) ECs. BRAF mutations were identified in only 3 of 75 (4.0%) ECs and were not found in ECs with KRAS mutations or RASSF1A methylation. RASSF1A methylation was more frequent in KRAS mutation-negative ECs than in KRAS mutation-positive ECs (37.7% vs 14.3%), but this inverse correlation is not statistically significant (p = 0.122). However, we observed that RASSF1A methylation was inversely correlated with KRAS and/or BRAF mutations (p = 0.028) in MSI-negative ECs, while this inverse correlation disappeared in MSI-positive ECs. Furthermore, in MSI-positive ECs, 2 cases of concomitant RASSF1A methylation and KRAS mutation were found. Taken together, these results provide strong evidence that, in EC tumorigenesis, RASSF1A promoter hypermethylation is as important as KRAS mutations in activating the RAS pathway.     

Demographic trends and KRAS/BRAFV600E mutations in colorectal cancer patients of South China: A single-site report

The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing in China. Here, we aimed to evaluate the latest demographic trends and KRAS/BRAF mutations status of Chinese CRC. Five thousand five hundred and forty-six CRC patients diagnosed from 2010 to 2017 were involved. KRAS exon 2 and BRAF^V600E mutations were detected by Sanger sequencing and high-resolution melting analysis or allelic-specific probe method. Gene mutation profiles and clinicopathologic characteristics of 5495 patients were analyzed. The joinpoint regression model was used to predict the demographic data in 2018. We found KRAS exon 2 and BRAF^V600E mutation rates were 37.7 and 2.8% in CRC patients. Tumors with KRAS exon 2 mutations were more likely to be present in female and patients aged older than 75 years, right colon and have well-differentiated histology. Tumors with BRAF^V600E mutations were more likely to be present in the female, right colon and have poorly differentiated histology. From 2010 to 2017, the percentage of colon cancer and tubular adenocarcinoma in CRC increased substantially (from 39.3 to 51.8%, from 78.6 to 93.4%, respectively). The percentage of right colon cancer increased from 18.3 to 20.5%, which predictively may keep at 22.6% in 2018. The rise trends for patients with moderate differentiation tumor or KRAS exon 2 mutated tumor were apparent (from 50.3 to 78.6%, from 32.8 to 39.7%, respectively). In conclusion, in recent 8 years, there is a shift to the colon, especially right colon in the incidence of Chinese CRC. Moreover tubular adenocarcinoma is becoming the primary histology type.     

Similar but different: distinct roles for KRAS and BRAF oncogenes in colorectal cancer development and therapy resistance

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is characterized by recurrent mutations deregulating key cell signaling cascades and providing the cancer cells with novel functional traits. Among the most frequent mutations in CRC are gain-of-function missense mutations in KRAS and BRAF. Oncogenic activation of KRAS and BRAF is mutually exclusive and occurs in approximately 40% and 10% of all CRCs, respectively. Here we summarize genetic alterations currently described in the literature and databases, indicating overlapping but also specific co-occurrences with either mutated BRAF or KRAS. We describe common and potentially specific biological functions of KRAS and BRAF oncoproteins in the intestinal epithelial cells and during initiation and progression of CRC. We discuss signal transduction networks, highlighting individual functions of oncogenic KRAS and BRAF in terms of feedback loops and their impact on treatment outcome. Finally, we give an update on current strategies of targeted therapeutic intervention in oncogenic RAS-RAF signaling networks for the treatment of metastatic CRC and outline future directions.     

Prognostic value of BRAF and KRAS mutation status in stage II and III microsatellite instable colon cancers

Microsatellite instability (MSI) has been associated with favourable survival in early stage colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to microsatellite stable (MSS) CRC. The BRAF V600E mutation has been associated with worse survival in MSS CRC. This mutation occurs in 40% of MSI CRC and it is unclear whether it confers worse survival in this setting. The prognostic value of KRAS mutations in both MSS and MSI CRC remains unclear. We examined the effect of BRAF and KRAS mutations on survival in stage II and III MSI colon cancer patients. BRAF exon 15 and KRAS exon 2–3 mutation status was assessed in 143 stage II (n = 85) and III (n = 58) MSI colon cancers by high resolution melting analysis and sequencing. The relation between mutation status and cancer‐specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analysis. BRAF V600E mutations were observed in 51% (n = 73) and KRAS mutations in 16% of cases (n = 23). Patients with double wild‐type cancers (dWT; i.e., BRAF and KRAS wild‐type) had a highly favourable survival with 5‐year CSS of 93% (95% CI 84–100%), while patients with cancers harbouring mutations in either BRAF or KRAS, had 5‐year CSS of 76% (95% CI 67–85%). In the subgroup of stage II patients with dWT cancers no cancer‐specific deaths were observed. On multivariate analysis, mutation in either BRAF or KRAS vs. dWT remained significantly prognostic. Mutations in BRAF as well as KRAS should be analyzed when considering these genes as prognostic markers in MSI colon cancers.     

Influence of KRAS mutation status in metachronous and synchronous metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND:

Mutations in the v‐Ki‐ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) are present in approximately 30% to 40% of colorectal adenocarcinomas. Wild‐type (WT) KRAS mutation status is predictive of tumor response with epidermal growth factor receptor‐directed therapies, but the results from studies evaluating the prognostic value of KRAS status in localized disease have been contradictory. The prognostic value of KRAS in metastatic disease, specifically according to whether patients have synchronous or metachronous disease at presentation, is less understood.

METHODS:

One‐hundred ten consecutive patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma underwent testing for KRAS exon 2 mutations by polymerase chain reaction amplification and direct nucleotide sequencing. The clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of these patients were then analyzed retrospectively, stratified according to whether patients presented with synchronous or metachronous metastasis and according to KRAS mutation status (WT or mutated).

RESULTS:

For the entire cohort, the median overall survival from the date of diagnosis of metastatic disease was 34.3 months (95% confidence interval, 28.3‐49.4 months) for patients with WT KRAS (n = 70). The median overall survival for patients with mutated KRAS (n = 40) was 40.3 months (95% confidence interval, 27.9‐51.1 months; log‐rank P = .91). Kaplan‐Meier survival analysis indicated that 3‐year overall survival and 5‐year overall survival were not statistically different. Within the subgroups of patients with synchronous and metachronous metastatic disease, no significant differences were observed in median overall survival, 3‐year overall survival, or 5‐year overall survival between the WT KRAS and mutated KRAS groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this study, KRAS mutation status did not influence overall survival in either synchronous or metachronous metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma and, as such, had no prognostic role in this disease setting. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Subtype-specific KRAS mutations in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study of patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy

BackgroundPlatinum-based chemotherapy is the most common treatment in advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma. Because the clinical significance of KRAS mutational status in this setting has not yet been clearly determined, a mutation subtype-specific analysis was performed in the so far largest cohort of Caucasian patients with KRAS mutant advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.Methods505 Caucasian stage III–IV lung adenocarcinoma patients with known amino acid substitution-specific KRAS mutational status and treated with platinum-based chemotherapy were included. The correlations of subtype-specific KRAS mutations with smoking status, progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively) and therapeutic response were analysed.ResultsAmong 338 KRAS wild-type, 147 codon 12 mutant and 20 codon 13 mutant patients, there were no mutation-related significant differences in PFS or OS (P values were 0.534 and 0.917, respectively). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status and clinical stage were significant independent prognostic factors. KRAS mutation showed a significant correlation with smoking status (P = 0.018). Importantly, however, G12V KRAS mutant patients were significantly more frequent among never-smokers than all other codon 12 KRAS mutant (G12x) subtypes (P = 0.016). Furthermore, this subgroup tended to have a higher response rate (66% versus 47%; P = 0.077). A modestly longer median PFS was also found in the G12V mutant cohort (233 days; versus 175 days in the G12x group; P = 0.145).ConclusionsWhile KRAS mutation status per se is neither prognostic nor predictive in stage III–IV lung adenocarcinoma, subtype-specific analysis may indeed identify clinically relevant subgroups of patients that may ultimately influence treatment decisions.     

Metabolic factors and the risk of colorectal cancer by KRAS and BRAF mutation status

Factors related to energy metabolism and the metabolic syndrome, such as higher body mass index (BMI), blood glucose, or blood lipids, and blood pressure, are associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, CRC is a heterogeneous disease, developing through distinct pathways with differences in molecular characteristics and prognosis, and possibly also in risk factors. For subtypes defined by KRAS and BRAF mutation status, BMI is the only metabolic factor previously studied, with inconsistent findings. We investigated whether associations between BMI, blood glucose, blood lipids, and blood pressure and CRC risk differed by tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status in 117,687 participants from two population-based cohorts within the Northern Sweden Health and Disease Study (NSHDS). Hazard ratios (HRs) for overall CRC and CRC subtypes by metabolic factors were estimated with Cox proportional hazards regression, using multiple imputation to handle missing exposure and tumor data. During a median follow-up of 15.6 years, we acquired 1,250 prospective CRC cases, of which 766 cases had complete baseline and molecular tumor data. Consistent with previous evidence, higher BMI, total cholesterol, triglyceride levels, and blood pressure were associated with an increased risk of overall CRC (HRs per 1 standard deviation increase: 1.07 to 1.12). These associations were similar regardless of CRC subtype by KRAS and BRAF mutation status (all p_{heterogeneity} > 0.05). The same was true for subtypes based on microsatellite instability status. Poor metabolic health may therefore be a universal mechanism for colorectal cancer, acting across multiple developmental pathways.     

Analysis of KRAS,NRAS, BRAF,PIK3CA and TP53 mutations in a large prospective series of locally advanced rectal cancer patients

Little information is available on the clinical significance of cancer-related genes such as KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and TP53 in nonmetastatic rectal cancer. We investigated mutations of these genes in a large prospective series of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients who were recruited into two phase II trials. Mutational analyses were performed with diagnostically validated methods including polymerase chain reaction, capillary electrophoresis single-strand conformational analysis, Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing. Associations between single or multiple gene mutations and clinicopathological characteristics and treatment outcomes were explored. Of these 269, 210 (78%) patients were assessable. Mutations of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, PIK3CA and TP53 occurred in 43, 9, 4, 9 and 60% of patients, respectively. Concordance between paired biopsy and resection specimens was 82% for KRAS, 95% for NRAS, 99% for BRAF, 96% for PIK3CA and 63% for TP53. TP53 mutations were associated with extramural venous invasion on baseline MRI (78% vs. 65%, p = 0.04), poor pathological tumour regression (23% vs. 36%, p = 0.05) and a trend toward a worse 5-year progression-free survival (PFS; 60% vs. 74%, HR 1.59, p = 0.06). Patients with tumours harbouring mutation of TP53 and either KRAS or NRAS (32%) had a worse 5-year PFS than those with TP53/KRAS/NRAS wild-type tumours (54% vs. 72%, HR 1.75, p = 0.02). In univariate analysis, BRAF mutation predicted poor 5-year overall survival only among patients treated without cetuximab (20% vs. 73%, HR 3.29, p = 0.03). This is one of the largest biomarker studies in a prospective, largely homogeneous, LARC population. Our findings are hypothesis generating and require validation in independent series.     

Combined analysis of specific KRAS mutation,BRAF and microsatellite instability identifies prognostic subgroups of sporadic and hereditary colorectal cancer

Confounding effects of specific KRAS gene alterations on colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis stratified by microsatellite instability (MSI) and BRAF^V600E have not yet been investigated. The aim of our study was to evaluate the combined effects of MSI, BRAF^V600E and specific KRAS mutation (Gly → Asp; G12D, Gly → Asp, G13D; Gly → Val; G12V) on prognosis in 404 sporadic and 94 hereditary CRC patients. MSI status was determined according to the Bethesda guidelines. Mutational status of KRAS and BRAF^V600E was assessed by direct DNA sequencing. In sporadic CRC, KRAS G12D mutations had a negative prognostic effect compared to G13D and wild‐type cancers (p = 0.038). With MSI, specific KRAS and BRAF^V600E mutations, 3 distinct prognostic subgroups were observed in univariate (p = 0.006) and multivariable (p = 0.051) analysis: patients with (i) KRAS mutation G12D, G12V or BRAF^V600E mutation, (ii) KRAS/BRAF^V600E wild‐type or KRAS G13D mutations in MSS/MSI‐L and (iii) MSI‐H and KRAS G13D mutations. Moreover, none of the sporadic MSI‐H or hereditary patients with KRAS G13 mutations had a fatal outcome. Specific KRAS mutation is an informative prognostic factor in both sporadic and hereditary CRC and applied in an algorithm with BRAF^V600E and MSI may identify sporadic CRC patients with poor clinical outcome.     

BRAF,KRAS and PIK3CA Mutation and Sensitivity to Trastuzumab in Breast Cancer Cell Line Model

Studies show that approximately 20% of all breast cancer patients have a breast tumor that tests positive for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2, otherwise known as the HER2 gene. As such, treatments for breast cancer usually include drugs that target HER2. The drug Trastuzumab is a recombinant antibody that has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of these HER2 positive breast cancers. However, researchers have found that mutations in associated genes, PIK3CA and KRAS, can cause the tumor to become resistant to Trastuzumab. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the sensitivity of the cancer cell lines to the drug Trastuzumab and investigate how this sensitivity is compromised by the PIK3CA, KRAS and BRAF gene mutations. Trastuzumab responsiveness was evaluated in breast cancer cell lines by treating the lines with an optimal concentration of the drug followed by a proliferation assay of the cell lines in the presence of monoclonal antibodies. We determined the optimum concentration of Trastuzumab to be 7 μg/well. The BRAF and KRAS mutated cell line, MDA-MB-231, showed the least sensitivity after being treated with trastuzumab when compared to the sensitivity of the PIK3CA mutated cell lines, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-361, and the KRAS/ BRAF/ PIK3CA cell line, MDA-MB-453. Clinical observations show that mutations in BRAF and KRAS genes in breast cancer cells do lower the responsiveness of Trastuzumab drug treatments.