Efficacy of tacrolimus in the treatment of refractory rejection in heart and lung transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Refractory acute cellular rejection may occur despite triple-drug immunosuppression (cyclosporine A, steroids, azathioprine/mycophenolate mofetil). The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of tacrolimus rescue therapy in patients maintained on cyclosporine-based immunosuppression (CBI). METHODS: Between December 1993 and October 1996, 208 patients underwent thoracic organ transplantation at the Hospital of the University of Wisconsin at Madison. One hundred forty-nine patients underwent heart replacement; 59 underwent lung transplantation. One hundred thirty-nine of the heart transplant cohort received CBI preceded by induction therapy with OKT3. Forty-six of the lung transplant cohort received CBI without induction cytolytic therapy. Refractory rejection was defined as failure to respond to high-dose steroids (500 mg to 1 g IV methylprednisolone for 3 days) and/or monoclonal antibody therapy (OKT3, 5 to 10 mg IV/day for 7 to 14 days). In patients with refractory rejection, cyclosporine was replaced with tacrolimus. RESULTS: Overall, 16% (30/185) of patients receiving CBI experienced refractory rejection. Thirty-one episodes of grade IIIa or greater rejection occurred in 11% (15/139) of heart transplant recipients. Twenty episodes of grade II to IV rejection occurred in 33% (15/46) of lung transplant recipients. After tacrolimus rescue therapy, 93% (14/15) of patients in the heart transplant group converted to grade II or less rejection. Refractory rejection was reversed in 73% (11/15) of the lung transplant group. Reversal was documented at biopsy in all (8/8) lung recipients in whom it had been histologically identified. FEV1 values of 3 additional patients stabilized. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of refractory rejection in thoracic organ transplant recipients on CBI is significant. Reversal of refractory rejection follows rescue immunotherapy with tacrolimus.     

Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in pediatric kidney transplant recipients

In pediatric kidney transplant recipients, tacrolimus has been proposed either for primary immunosuppression or as a rescue agent for refractory acute rejection, chronic rejection, and cyclosporine toxicity. This paper describes our experience with tacrolimus conversion from cyclosporine-based therapy in six selected cases: four due to refractory acute rejections unresponsive to conventional therapy, one to chronic graft rejection, and one to cyclosporine-related hypertrichosis. A "simple-switch" conversion was used without any overlap, starting with a dose of 0.2 mg/kg per day. The time to conversion varied from 10 to 730 days after the transplant. In the patients with acute rejection, the median time to reversal after tacrolimus conversion was 12 days. The symptoms of the patient with cyclosporine toxicity completely resolved without any loss of allograft function. The patient with chronic rejection maintained stable renal function for more than 1 year after conversion. A new onset of post-transplant diabetes mellitus and dose-related nephrotoxicity were recorded as adverse events. In conclusion, our experience suggests that tacrolimus can play an important role in the salvage treatment of pediatric kidney transplantations with deteriorating graft function due to acute rejection refractory to standard therapy. Tacrolimus conversion also provides excellent results in the presence of cyclosporine toxicity.     

心脏移植后采用他克莫司替代环孢素A治疗的体会

目的 探讨心脏移植后因排斥反应或环孢素A(CsA)不良反应而将CsA替换为他克莫司(FK506)的临床效果.方法 6例原位心脏移植患者中,5例因发生严重排斥反应或排斥反应不能控制、1例因CsA的肝毒性,而将CsA替换为FK506,其它免疫抑制剂不变,转换时间为术后(167.8±166.7)d,FK506的用量为(6.0±1.4)mg/d,维持其血药浓度在(14.7±5.6) μg/L.心内膜心肌活检(EMB)联合超声心动图监测排斥反应.结果 随访(17.1±6.0)个月,6例患者全部存活,2例心功能下降者在换用FK506后心功能恢复正常.换用FK506前,排斥反应评分为(2.50±0.42)分,换用FK506后,排斥反应评分降至(0.60±0.39)分(P＜0.01).1例患者转换为FK506后3周,出现发热及胸腔积液,经抗结核治疗1周后好转,半年后停止抗结核治疗,患者至今存活1年;转换为FK506后,4例患者因血糖升高(其中2例转换前血糖即升高)需用胰岛素治疗;换用FK506后,CsA所致的多毛消失,牙龈增生减轻.结论 心脏移植后采用CsA进行免疫抑制治疗者,若反复发生排斥反应或出现不能耐受的CsA不良反应,可将CsA替换为FK506,临床效果明显.     

Primary immunosuppression with tacrolimus in kidney transplantation: three-year follow-up in a single center

INTRODUCTION: The 1-year results of the phase III US Multicenter Trial comparing tacrolimus- and cyclosporine (Sandimmun)-based immunosuppressive therapy in kidney transplantation revealed a significant reduction in the incidence and severity of acute rejection episodes among patients maintained on tacrolimus. This retrospective, nonrandomized, single-center study represented 3-year data for patient and graft survival and safety in the tacrolimus-treated patients. METHODS: Among 97 consecutive kidney transplant recipients 41 who received tacrolimus and 56 cyclosporine-based immunosuppression were followed for 3 years for patient and graft survivals and for the incidence of acute rejection episodes as well as serious adverse events. RESULTS: The 3-year patient and graft survival rates for tacrolimus and cyclosporine were similar (91.0% vs 90.2%, 96.5% vs 95.0%). However, the incidence of acute rejection episodes was significantly lower in the tacrolimus (17.1%) compared with the cyclosporine group (35.7%, P = .043). There was a higher incidence of headache, posttransplant diabetes, and alopecia reported in the tacrolimus group, whereas hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and hirsutism were more frequent in the cyclosporine group. The incidences of hand tremor, hyperkalemia, and viral infections were comparable in both groups. Two patients in the tacrolimus group were converted to cyclosporine due to nephrotoxicity and posttransplant diabetes, respectively, whereas 12 patients in the cyclosporine group were converted to tacrolimus as rescue therapy for acute rejection (41.7%), gingival hyperplasia (33.3%), nephrotoxicity (8.3%), neurotoxicity (8.3%), and hirsutism (8.3%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The 3-year results of tacrolimus treatment show excellent efficacy and safety in kidney transplantation. Due to different side-effect profiles, it is necessary to develop individualized immunosuppressive strategies in kidney transplant recipients.     

Conversion from cyclosporine to FK506 in adult liver transplant recipients: a combined North American and European experience

BACKGROUND: Although cyclosporine (CsA) made clinical liver transplantation possible, side effects and development of rejection have limited its use. In some patients, conversion to tacrolimus has been necessary to abrogate side effects and to preserve allograft function. METHODS: The results of conversion from CsA to tacrolimus were studied retrospectively in 94 liver allograft recipients from a North American and a European transplant center (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, and Hopital Beaujon, Clichy, France). RESULTS: Forty-seven of 94 patients (50%) were converted for steroid-resistant acute rejection. Conversion was successful in 91% of these patients, whereas 9% of patients developed chronic rejection. A further nine patients were converted for chronic allograft rejection with positive results in eight of nine grafts. Mean serum bilirubin in these nine patients was 8.7 mg/dl before conversion and 2.1 mg/dl 6 months after conversion (P=0.02). Nine patients were converted due to inability to wean steroid. Of these, six patients remains steroid free 1 year after conversion. Twenty-three patients (24%) were converted for nephrotoxicity with a reduction in serum creatinine from 167+/-36 mmol/L to 119+/-28 mmol/L 1 year after conversion (P=0.006). Eight of 11 patients converted for neurotoxicity improved after conversion. Conversion to tacrolimus had no effect on seizure frequency or memory loss. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that conversion to tacrolimus from CsA is an appropriate paradigm for graft rescue and treatment of a variety of side effects after liver transplant. However, some situations such as memory loss and hypertension may require other strategies.     

Tacrolimus as a rescue immunosuppressant after heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective study is to review our experience with tacrolimus as a rescue immunosuppressant for heart transplant recipients with refractory rejection or cyclosporine intolerance. METHODS: From June 1995 to November 1998, 15 cardiac transplant recipients were converted from our standard cyclosporine-based immunosuppressive regimen to a tacrolimus-based treatment. Each patient had been treated with cyclosporine, azathioprine and steroids. Six were switched to tacrolimus for persistent rejection, four for recurrent acute rejection and five for severe debilitating side-effects attributed to cyclosporine. All ten patients converted to tacrolimus because of rejection had been treated with high-dose methylprednisolone intravenously and four had also received anti-lymphocyte globulin (ALG; one patient) or anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG; three patients) preparations. RESULTS: The time between transplantation and conversion to tacrolimus ranged from 44 to 1866 (median, 380) days. The range of follow-up after conversion was 84-1379 (median, 806) days. Eleven patients are alive with a follow-up period of 764+/-435 (median, 820) days. Four patients died between 90 and 930 (median, 464) days after conversion. The average number of episodes of acute rejection/recipient decreased from 2.1+/-1.6 on the cyclosporine regimen to 0.2+/-0.4 on the tacrolimus regimen (P<0.001). When the incidence of acute rejection was normalized for follow-up times (episodes/100 patient-days), the results were 1.1+/-1.4 and 0.07+/-0.2, respectively (P<0.01). The persistent/recurrent rejection resolved in all ten patients who were converted to tacrolimus. None of the five cyclosporine intolerant patients converted to tacrolimus experienced rejection after the changeover. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, conversion from a cyclosporine-based to a tacrolimus-based maintenance immunosuppression has been shown to be an effective and safe approach to the management of patients with persistent or recurrent cardiac allograft rejection or those with cyclosporine intolerance.     

Post-operative conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in heart transplantation: a single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: Tacrolimus is a potent calcineurin inhibitor that was introduced to heart transplantation in the early 1990s. The side-effect profile of tacrolimus is more favorable than that of cyclosporine and some reports have suggested an advantage of tacrolimus in the treatment of rejection. The present study was undertaken to determine whether a late conversion to tacrolimus affords these benefits to heart transplant recipients. METHODS: Charts from 109 patients who underwent conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus for recurrent rejection or adverse effects were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: During the year after conversion to tacrolimus, there was a significant decrease in treated rejection episodes. Conversion to tacrolimus rapidly resulted in an improved lipid profile. Two years after conversion blood pressure was significantly reduced. Apart from rejection, these benefits were found mainly among individuals converted to tacrolimus within 1 year of heart transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus is safe and results in a more favorable risk factor profile. However, most of the benefits are seen in individuals converted within 1 year of transplantation.     

The effect of conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus on gingival hyperplasia, hirsutism and cholesterol

The use of cyclosporine for immunosuppression in renal transplantation allograft recipients is associated with hypertrichosis, gingival hyperplasia, and hypercholesterolemia. Conversion of patients to tacrolimus may lead to an improvement in these effects with minimal risk of rejection or allograft dysfunction. METHODS: Sixteen renal transplant recipients were prospectively converted from CsA to tacrolimus and followed for 1 year. Gingival hyperplasia index, total cholesterol, and blood pressure were recorded at the outset, 4-, 8-, and 12-month intervals. Glomerular filtration rate was checked before conversion and 1 year later. Photographs documenting hypertrichosis were taken before conversion and 1 year later. Adverse effects from tacrolimus were recorded at 4, 8, and 12 months. RESULTS: Twelve patients with hypertrichosis noted rapid improvement. Mean gingival hyperplasia index decreased from 24 to 6; mean total cholesterol decreased from 237 to 195. Glomerular filtration rate was essentially unchanged (56 to 54). One episode of rejection occurred, three patients developed diarrhea, three noted headaches, and one had a tremor. CONCLUSION: If carefully monitored, patients suffering adverse effects secondary to cyclosporine may be converted to tacrolimus with minimal risk of allograft dysfunction or rejection.     

Ethnic disparity in clinical outcome after heart transplantation is abrogated using tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil-based immunosuppression

BACKGROUND: Black American heart transplant recipients receiving cyclosporine-based primary immunoprophylaxis suffer higher rates of allograft rejection with hemodynamic compromise, infections, and posttransplant coronary artery disease. We examined the hypothesis that a combination of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil "resurrects" clinical outcome of black Americans to those seen in white heart transplant recipients. METHODS: Sixty-three adult primary heart transplant recipients were included in this study. Twenty black American and 21 white patients who received tacrolimus-based primary immunoprophylaxis were enrolled in this prospective, observational parallel cohort investigation. A separate group of 22 black American patients were randomly allocated to receive cyclosporine-microemulsion-based primary prophylaxis and served as the control population for assessing outcomes in the black American group. Adjunctive immunosuppression included mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids. The primary end-point was the freedom from allograft rejection requiring treatment at 1 year. Secondary end-points included rejection with hemodynamic compromise, and patient or graft survival. Adverse events evaluated included development of infections requiring hospitalization and nonimmunological outcomes including hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus (new onset or worsened). RESULTS: Tacrolimus-treated black American patients had greater freedom from allograft rejection requiring treatment at 1 year than those treated with cyclosporine (64% vs. 37%, P=0.01). No differences were noted between tacrolimus-treated black Americans and whites in the primary end point (64% and 67% respectively, P=nonsignificant [NS]). Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression was associated with better 1-year survival in black Americans compared with cyclosporine (95% vs. 73%, P=0.04), and this end point was similar to that achieved in tacrolimus-treated white heart transplant recipients (95%). No differences in infection rates were noted among either group. Cyclosporine-treated black Americans suffered more hyperlipidemia and worse hypertension than tacrolimus-treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with cyclosporine, an immunosuppressive strategy using tacrolimus in black Americans achieves superior efficacy with regard to allograft rejection, higher allograft survival, and similar safety. Furthermore, tacrolimus-based immunosuppression is similar in immunological efficacy and safety in black Americans and in white heart transplant recipients.     

Tacrolimus rescue in liver transplant patients with refractory rejection or intolerance or malabsorption of cyclosporine. The US Multicenter FK506 Liver Study Group.

Tacrolimus is an effective immunosuppressant in the rescue of liver allograft patients in whom conventional immunosuppression failed. Efficacy and safety were examined in a multicenter trial of liver transplant recipients converted to tacrolimus because of rejection despite cyclosporine (CyA) therapy or intolerance to CyA. Six hundred seventy-seven patients were enrolled onto the study; 475 patients for rejection, 197 patients for intolerance, and 5 patients treated compassionately. The mean daily dose of tacrolimus was less in the intolerance (Int) patients throughout the study: 0.22 versus 0.17 mg/kg at 1 week and 0.14 versus 0.11 mg/kg at 24 months in rejection (Rej) and Int patients, respectively. Mean blood levels paralleled dosing in both groups, but were greater in the Rej patients (10.7 v 8.3 ng/mL at 18 months). Kaplan-Meier estimates of patient and graft survival were similar in the two groups. Patient survival rates were 80.1% and 81.5%, and graft survival rates were 72.7% and 73.9% at 24 months in the Rej and Int patients, respectively. Most adverse events occurred with a similar incidence in the two groups. Those with a 4% or greater incidence were fever, viral hepatitis, and pneumonia. The incidence of sepsis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, kidney failure, and convulsion was greater in the Int group. The incidence of abnormal liver function test results, hyperglycemia, headache, and abnormal kidney function was greater in the Rej group. Mean liver function test results decreased with time postrescue in both groups. Mean serum creatinine level increased from baseline to 18 months postrescue in both groups (1.44 to 1.51 mg/dL for Int patients, 1.14 to 1.48 mg/dL for Rej patients). We conclude tacrolimus is safe and effective rescue in liver transplant recipients with rejection or CyA intolerance.     

Conversion to cyclosporine provides valuable rescue therapy for living donor adult liver transplant patients intolerant to tacrolimus: A single-center experience at the University of Tokyo

Tacrolimus-based immunosuppression is currently accepted as mainstream therapy in many transplant centers worldwide due to its potent immunosuppressive activity compared to cyclosporine. A tacrolimus-based regimen has been successfully used for our living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. Adverse effects such as neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and new-onset diabetes mellitus, however, have limited its clinical application. In deceased donor liver transplantation, cyclosporine rescue therapy is valuable for such complications, but few reports have described a strategy for conversion in LDLT. Herein, we present our experience of conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine therapy in adult LDLT recipients. Among 203 recipients, 37 patients (18%) required conversion, primarily for neurotoxicity (41%), diabetes mellitus (16%), hematopoietic disorder (16%), and gastrointestinal intolerance (11%). Primary adverse events resolved within 2 months after conversion in 35/37 (94%) of the patients. For LDLT recipients unable to maintain effective immunosuppression with tacrolimus, conversion to cyclosporine is an effective option.     

Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients: safety, metabolic changes, and pharmacokinetic comparison

BACKGROUND: Although conversion between tacrolimus and cyclosporine has been performed when indicated for rejection or adverse effects, the safety and metabolic outcome of elective conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine has not previously been examined. METHODS: Conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine was performed in 19 recipients of cadaver renal transplants at 3-6 months after transplantation. Pharmacokinetic profiles and biochemical studies were performed three times, in steady state, before, and after conversion. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival was 100% at 3 months after conversion, with no rejection episodes. Three patients have been subsequently converted back to tacrolimus, two for rejection and one for hirsutism. There were no significant changes in creatinine, urate, or blood sugar levels after conversion, but the mean plasma magnesium rose from 0.73 (0.63-0.97) to 0.82 (0.65-1) mmol/L (P=0.037), and the mean plasma cholesterol rose from 5.2 (3.4-6.8) to 5.5 (3.8-7.6) mmol/L (P=0.033). Pharmacokinetic profiles were measured before and after conversion, and showed that cyclosporine (Neoral) exhibited significantly less interpatient and intrapatient variability than tacrolimus, for area under the curve (AUC), maximum concentration after dose (Cmax), minimum concentration after dose (Cmin), and time to maximum concentration (Tmax). CONCLUSION: This is the first study that has examined the outcome of conversion from tacrolimus- to cyclosporine-based immunosuppression in stable patients after renal transplantation. This conversion was performed without early immunological hazard, but there was a small rise in blood cholesterol levels after conversion. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that cyclosporine in the form of Neoral exhibited less inter- and intrapatient variability than tacrolimus, although this is of uncertain clinical significance.     

Immunosuppression: practice and trends

Over the past decade, immunosuppression therapy has undergone striking changes in the scale and pace by which new immunosuppressive molecules and antibodies have become incorporated into daily transplant medicine. An organ-by-organ review of data reveals several trends. The highest use of induction therapy (over 70% of patients) was reported for simultaneous pancreas kidney (SPK) and pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants in 2002; use of induction therapy was less common in liver transplants (only 18%). Corticosteroids served as discharge maintenance immunosuppression in over 87% of the recipients of kidney, SPK, PAK and thoracic transplants, and in over 70% of pancreas transplant alone (PTA) recipients. Corticosteroid use in intestine transplants was reported in 64% of recipients in 2002. A shift in the calcineurin inhibitor used for maintenance immunosuppression from cyclosporine to tacrolimus for the majority of patients had occurred for kidney, PAK, SPK, PTA, liver, lung, and heart-lung by 2001. For heart transplants, cyclosporine remained the calcineurin inhibitor of choice; tacrolimus remained the predominant calcineurin inhibitor agent for intestine (since 1994). Use of antibody treatment for rejection during the first post-transplant year for most organs declined. Short-term outcomes have improved, based on the observation that rates of rejection within the first year post-transplant have diminished.     

Long-term beneficial effect of tacrolimus conversion on renal transplant recipients

OBJECTIVE: Acute rejection, chronic allograft nephropathy, and cyclosporine (CsA) toxicity remain serious problems for renal transplant recipients and may lead to graft loss. We retrospectively analyzed 34 patients whose biopsies revealed acute and/or chronic allograft rejection, or CsA nephrotoxicity, and who converted from CsA to tacrolimus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1996 through September 2003, CsA was converted to tacrolimus in 34 renal transplant recipients (26 male, 8 female) with renal biopsy at our hospital. Blood pressure and serum creatinine levels were checked monthly and serum cholesterol, triglyceride, and glutamic-pyruvic transaminase (GPT) levels were checked every three months. RESULTS: A consistently stable and better function after conversion was obtained in a significant portion (24, 71%) of patients. A statistically significant decline in serum creatinine and an improvement in the glomerular filtration rate were found at 3 m, 6 m, 12 m, 36 m, and 72 m after tacrolimus conversion. In 85.7% (12/14) of patients with acute rejection and in 35.7% (5/14) of patients with chronic allograft nephropathy (concomitant with acute rejection in 5), improved or stabilized graft function was noted. In addition, the systolic blood pressure and diastolic BP dropped significantly (P<0.05), while there was no significant change in cholesterol, triglyceride, and GPT levels. CONCLUSION: The beneficial effect of tacrolimus conversion on patients with acute rejection, chronic allograft nephropathy, or CsA nephrotoxicity was demonstrated in long-term follow up. The improvement in both renal function and blood pressure may be of paramount importance in reducing long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.     

Safety and efficacy of tacrolimus rescue therapy in 55 kidney transplant patients treated with cyclosporine

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus, we analyzed 55 kidney transplant patients who were converted due to cosmetic reasons in 42 patients, acute rejection in 2 patients, and other causes in 11 patients. At the doses and levels used, the development of diabetes mellitus was minimized. Disappearance of cosmetic side-effects and improvement of cardiovascular risk factors, together with conservation of renal function, encourage us to use tacrolimus as an efficacious and safe immunosuppressive therapy.     

Effects of immediate switch from cyclosporine microemulsion to tacrolimus at first acute rejection in renal allograft recipients

BACKGROUND: A number of institutions have reported favorable results in renal transplant patients after conversion from cyclosporine (CsA) to tacrolimus at the time of acute rejection, but no prospective, controlled study has been performed to date. Here, we report the first randomized study comparing patients whose therapy was changed at a first episode of acute rejection to tacrolimus with those who were maintained on CsA microemulsion (ME). METHODS: This 3-month, prospective, open, multicenter, parallel-group study was conducted at 15 centers in seven European countries. In total, 119 renal graft recipients experiencing a first biopsy-proven acute rejection episode while receiving CsA-ME were randomized (1:1) to start tacrolimus-based therapy (n=61) or to continue CsA-ME-based therapy (n=58). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable for both groups. The initial rejection episode responded to steroid treatment in 93.4% (tacrolimus) and 63.8% (CsA-ME) (P=0.001), respectively. In patients at risk, the incidence of recurrent rejection events within 3 months was significantly lower with tacrolimus therapy (5/57, 8.8%) compared with CsA-ME therapy (15/44, 34.1%) (P=0.002). Patient and graft survival were similar in both study groups 3 months after randomization. The most frequently reported adverse events were increased serum creatinine (29.5% vs. 22.4%), hypertension (24.6% vs. 22.4%), and urinary tract infection (18.0% vs. 20.7%) for tacrolimus versus CsA-ME. Tremor was more common in tacrolimus treated-patients (17.4% vs. 2.1%, P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Early conversion to tacrolimus therapy benefited the resolution of acute rejection episodes and significantly reduced the risk of recurrent rejection compared with continuation of CsA-ME.     

International experience with conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus for acute and chronic lung allograft rejection

OBJECTIVE: A retrospective study involving 13 institutions was performed to assess the efficacy of conversion from cyclosporine (INN: ciclosporin) to tacrolimus. METHODS: Data from 244 patients were analyzed. Indications for conversion were recurrent-ongoing rejection (n = 110) and stage 1 to 3 bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (n = 134). RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection decreased significantly within 3 months after versus before the switch from cyclosporine to tacrolimus (P <.01). For patients with recurrent-ongoing rejection, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second decreased by 1.96% of predicted value per month (P =.08 vs zero slope) before and increased by 0.34% of predicted value per month (P =.32 vs zero slope) after conversion (P <.06). For patients with stage 1 to 3 bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, a significant reduction of rejection episodes was observed (P <.01). In single transplant recipients a decrease of the forced expiratory volume in 1 second averaged 2.25% of predicted value per month (P <.01 vs zero slope) before and 0.29% of predicted value per month after conversion. Corresponding values for bilateral transplant recipients were 3.7% of predicted value per month (P <.01 vs zero slope) and 0.9% of predicted value per month (P = 0.04 vs zero slope), respectively. No significant difference in the incidence of infections within 3 months before and after conversion was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus after lung transplantation is associated with reversal of recurrent-ongoing rejection. Conversion for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome allows short-term stabilization of lung function in most patients.     

Tacrolimus in pediatric heart transplantation: ameliorated side effects in the steroid-free, statin era

Abstract:  Due to concerns over the side effects of cyclosporine, tacrolimus is widely used in pediatric heart transplantation. However, tacrolimus therapy is also accompanied by potentially serious side effects. This paper examines the side effect profile of tacrolimus in a large group of pediatric heart recipients. Data on renal function, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and hypertension were collected by case-note review of 100 patients who had received ≥ 12 months treatment with tacrolimus. Forty-two patients received tacrolimus from the time of transplant ( de novo ), and 58 were initially treated with cyclosporine (switch). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate improved in the first six months post transplant in the de novo group (66.7–84.6 mL/min/1.73 m², p = 0.002). Conversely, it decreased in those initially treated with cyclosporine (82.1–68.8, p = 0.032), but improved after switch to tacrolimus (77.3–85.6, p = 0.006). Twenty-one percent exhibited glucose intolerance, and 2% had diabetes. Borderline or elevated fasting cholesterol levels were present in 4.4%. Hypertension was seen in 67% at the point of switch from cyclosporine, which fell to 36% at latest follow-up (p = 0.001). These results present an encouraging outlook for this cohort of patients. The relatively low levels of complications shown may be due to early weaning of steroids, and concomitant statin therapy.     

Tacrolimus rescue therapy for children with acute renal transplant rejection

Seventeen children with renal transplants (11 living-related, age 2–18 years) were converted from cyclosporine to tacrolimus because of acute rejection that failed to respond to high-dose corticosteroids. Resistance to corticosteroids was confirmed by renal biopsy in 14 patients, and assumed in 3 patients because of failure of serum creatinine to improve to baseline values. Four patients were also treated with OKT3, and 15 children had been receiving mycophenolate maintenance therapy prior to conversion to tacrolimus. Rejection occurred at 2–174 weeks post transplant (mean 52 weeks). Actuarial 1- and 2-year graft survival was 87% and 78%. Three children progressed to end-stage renal disease after 4, 12, and 13 months of tacrolimus. The remaining 14 children have functioning allografts after 20–168 weeks of treatment (mean 80 weeks). All 14 children exhibit stable or improved renal function: serum creatinine 1.1±0.7 mg/dl versus 2.0±0.9 mg/dl prior to tacrolimus. In conclusion, tacrolimus was effective therapy for both early and late acute rejection in children who failed to respond to high-dose corticosteroids. No significant short-term adverse effects were encountered. Received: 29 August 2000 / Revised: 31 July 2001 / Accepted: 31 July 2001     

Fever of unknown origin in renal transplant patients with tacrolimus

Abstract:  The immunosuppressive agent tacrolimus is now widely used for the prevention of acute and chronic rejection in renal allograft recipients. We here report on three patients, who developed drug-induced fever due to tacrolimus one to five months after renal transplantation. Extensive search for a focus, autoantibodies and virus infection remained inconclusive. Therefore, drug-induced fever was suggested. After discontinuing tacrolimus and switching to cyclosporine A fever completely resolved within 24 h. This report demonstrates that tacrolimus-induced drug fever should be included in the differential diagnosis of fever of unknown origin in renal transplant recipients.