Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin in various tissue culture monolayers.

Thirty stool filtrates known to contain Clostridium difficile toxin based on previous testing on McCoy cells were tested for toxicity on primary African green monkey kidney (AGMK), McCoy, MRC-5, primary rhesus monkey kidney (RMK), and Vero cells. All 30 filtrates showed cytotoxic effect at greater than or equal to 1:100 dilution on McCoy and Vero cells. A total of 22 filtrates were positive on MRC-5 monolayers, while only 16 and 10 filtrates showed positive cytotoxic effect on AGMK and RMK cells, respectively. Another 630 stool specimens were tested on McCoy and Vero cells only. Of these stool filtrates, 70 were positive and 560 were negative with both cell lines, which thus gave 100% agreement. Vero cells can be used interchangeably with McCoy cells for the detection of C. difficile toxin in stool filtrates.     

Utility of a rapid latex test for the detection of Clostridium difficile in fecal specimens

Currently, the method of choice for the laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile disease is the detection of cytotoxin in stool filtrates by tissue culture. Since many hospital laboratories do not have tissue culture facilities, there is a need for a rapid test which is both sensitive and specific to diagnose C. difficile disease. A commercial latex agglutination was compared with the conventional cytotoxin tissue culture assay for the detection of C. difficile or its toxin(s) in fecal specimens. Of the 574 specimens evaluated, 111 were cytotoxin positive while 97 were positive by the latex agglutination test. There were 17 specimens positive by latex agglutination but negative by tissue culture assay. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the CDT latex test was 86.1 percent and 95.3 percent respectively. This rapid latex test can serve as an excellent screening procedure for the presence of C. difficile. Those specimens positive by the latex test should be further evaluated for the presence of cytotoxin by tissue culture.     

Technique for measuring 50% end points in cytotoxicity assays for Clostridium difficile toxins.

Serial dilutions of Clostridium difficile culture filtrates were incubated overnight with HeLa cell monolayers. Cells were fixed in formalin, stained with crystal violet, rinsed, and drained. Cell rounding could be observed microscopically in the stained monolayers. Absorbance of the retained dye on monolayers in the drained wells was measured at 595 nm-405 nm. End points could also be estimated visually. The dilution at which dye absorbance was reduced by 50% agreed with that determined by microscopic observations. Five replicate dilution series showed high reproducibility. Specificity was verified by neutralisation with crude rabbit antibody to C difficile toxins. Cytotoxicity in faecal specimens was assayed in the same way, allowing reporting of titres, comparison with standard toxin preparations, and determination of the extent of neutralisation to be made. This novel assay technique has proved effective and reliable in a clinical setting and should allow the gathering of more information on the epidemiology of antibiotic associated colitis.     

Mammalian epithelial cell line kit for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin.

The performance characteristics of a mammalian epithelial (MEP) cell line kit (Cytotoxi Test; Advanced Clinical Diagnostics, Toledo, Ohio) for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxin was compared with that of conventional tissue culture assays with human embryonic lung (HEL) cells in shell vials and human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs) in test tubes. One hundred forty-nine stool samples were tested. The MEP cells were at least as sensitive as the HEL cells for use in C. difficile toxin detection. Results for the MEP cells were also obtained considerably more rapidly than those for HEL cells when the cells were examined at 4 and 24 h and then every 24 h for up to 5 days. Approximately one-third of all positive MEP cells were detected at 4 h and 95% were detected by 48 h. In comparison, in the HEL shell vial monolayers, only 6% of the positive cells were detectable at 4 h and 76% were detectable at 48 h. The times for C. difficile toxin-induced cytotoxicity in HFF cells were similar to those in HEL cells. Shell vials carrying HEL cell monolayers (ViroMed Laboratories Inc., Minnetonka, Minn.) are a sensitive and reliable commercial source for the detection of C. difficile toxin, although they cannot detect C. difficile as rapidly as the Cytotoxi test with the MEP cell monolayers.     

Detection of verotoxin in stool specimens.

A total of 132 fecal specimens containing verotoxin (VT) were subjected to counter-current immunoelectrophoresis (CIE). Of these, 113 (85.6%) were found to be positive by CIE. Another 71 stool specimens containing E. coli serogroup O157 but with flagellar antigens other than H7 were tested for verotoxin by CIE. These stool specimens were negative for VT on Vero cell monolayers. Of these 71 stool specimens, 6 (8.5%) gave positive tests for verotoxin by CIE. Forty stool specimen filtrates which were negative for VT (negative controls) were also subjected to CIE. One of these stool specimen filtrates gave a line of precipitation by CIE. The specificity of the CIE test was 93.7%, and the sensitivity was 85.6%. False-positive results may have been due to an antibody component against the somatic antigen (O157) in the antitoxin used; this is a limitation of the CIE test. In a related evaluation, 302 stool specimen filtrates containing VT were retested with Vero cell suspension cultures in microdilution plates. Of these, 281 stool specimen filtrates showed cytotoxic effects within 24 h, while the remaining 21 filtrates showed the effects within 48 h. The use of Vero cell suspension culture is as reliable as the use of Vero cell monolayers and provides detection of verotoxin 24 to 48 h sooner.     

Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile: comparison of the cell culture neutralization, Xpert C. difficile, Xpert C. difficile/Epi, and Illumigene C. difficile assays

Clostridium difficile is the most important cause of nosocomial diarrhea. Several laboratory techniques are available to detect C. difficile toxins or the genes that encode them in fecal samples. We evaluated the Xpert C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile/Epi (Cepheid, CA) that detect the toxin B gene (tcdB) and tcdB, cdt, and a deletion in tcdC associated with the 027/NAP1/BI strain, respectively, by real-time PCR, and the Illumigene C. difficile (Meridian Bioscience, Inc.) that detects the toxin A gene (tcdA) by loop-mediated isothermal amplification in stool specimens. Toxigenic culture was used as the reference method for discrepant stool specimens. Two hundred prospective and fifty retrospective diarrheal stool specimens were tested simultaneously by the cell cytotoxin neutralization assay (CCNA) and the Xpert C. difficile, Xpert C. difficile/Epi, and Illumigene C. difficile assays. Of the 200 prospective stools tested, 10.5% (n = 23) were determined to be positive by CCNA, 17.5% (n = 35) were determined to be positive by Illumigene C. difficile, and 21.5% (n = 43) were determined to be positive by Xpert C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile/Epi. Of the 50 retrospective stools, previously determined to be positive by CCNA, 94% (n = 47) were determined to be positive by Illumigene C. difficile and 100% (n = 50) were determined to be positive by Xpert C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile/Epi. Of the 11 discrepant results (i.e., negative by Illumigene C. difficile but positive by Xpert C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile/Epi), all were determined to be positive by the toxigenic culture. A total of 21% of the isolates were presumptively identified by the Xpert C. difficile/Epi as the 027/NAP1/BI strain. The Xpert C. difficile and Xpert C. difficile/Epi assays were the most sensitive, rapid, and easy-to use assays for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile in stool specimens.     

Rapid and simple method for detecting the toxin B gene of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens by loop-mediated isothermal amplification

We applied the loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay to the detection of the toxin B gene (tcdB) of Clostridium difficile for identification of toxin B (TcdB)-positive C. difficile strains and detection of tcdB in stool specimens. tcdB was detected in all toxin A (TcdA)-positive, TcdB-positive (A(+)B(+)) and TcdA-negative, TcdB-positive (A(-)B(+)) C. difficile strains but not from TcdA-negative, TcdB-negative strains. Of the 74 stool specimens examined, A(+)B(+) or A(-)B(+) C. difficile was recovered from 39 specimens, of which 38 specimens were LAMP positive and one was negative. Amplification was obtained in 10 specimens that were culture negative, indicating that LAMP is highly sensitive. The LAMP assay was applied to detection of tcdB in DNA extracted by a simple boiling method from 47 of those 74 specimens, which were cultured overnight in cooked-meat medium (CMM). Twenty-two of 24 culture-positive specimens were positive for LAMP on DNA from the culture in CMM. Four specimens were culture negative but positive by LAMP on DNA from CMM cultures. The LAMP assay is a reliable tool for identification of TcdB-positive C. difficile as well as for direct detection of tcdB in stool specimens with high sensitivity. Detection of tcdB by LAMP from overnight cultures in CMM could be an alternative method of diagnostic testing at clinical laboratories without special apparatus.     

"Second look" at cytotoxin B of Clostridium difficile in the course of diarrhea associated with antibiotic therapy]

Clostridium difficile is a sporulated obligate anaerobe responsible for most cases of antibiotic-associated colitis, for 15 to 25% of cases of antibiotic-related diarrhea, and for a substantial proportion of nosocomial infections. The most important laboratory test for the diagnosis of C. difficile infection is examination of the stool for C. difficile toxins A and/or B. Detection of cytotoxin B using the direct cytotoxicity assay (D-CA) is the gold standard test. Whether routine isolation of the organism from stool is warranted remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate second-look CA done on C. difficile culture-positive filtrates from stool samples negative by the D-CA. METHODS: 300 consecutive stool samples sent to the Alfred Fournier Institute from April through October 1998 for a CA were routinely cultured on modified Cefoxitin Cycloserine Fructose Agar medium (CCFA). All CA-negative samples that grew C. difficile were examined by second-look CA. RESULTS: 245 stool specimens (81.7%) were negative by both CA and culture. The remaining 55 specimens all yielded C. difficile by culture; 32 (58.2%) had a positive D-CA and nine (16.4%) a negative D-CA with a positive second-look CA done on culture filtrates. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that stool specimens sent for a direct CA should be routinely cultured to provide material for a second-look CA on culture-positive filtrates if the first CA prove negative. Culturing also allows to study antimicrobial drug resistance phenotypes and epidemiological markers.     

Comparison of the VIDAS Clostridium difficile toxin A immunoassay with C. difficile culture and cytotoxin and latex tests.

The VIDAS Clostridium difficile toxin A immunoassay (CDA) is a new, automated, enzyme-linked fluorescent-antibody assay for detection of C. difficile toxin A antigen in stool specimens. Simultaneous, parallel testing was performed by using the VIDAS CDA, the Culturette brand CDT latex test for C. difficile antigens, and conventional laboratory cell culture tests for C. difficile, cytotoxicity and C. difficile culture. One hundred ninety-four consecutive fresh soft or liquid stool samples submitted for C. difficile testing between July and September 1990 were evaluated. Of the 194 samples tested, 19 (10%) were from 16 patients who met our case definition for C. difficile-associated disease. The in vitro tests were evaluated in relation to two forms of a clinical case definition. In one form, a positive culture for toxin-producing C. difficile or a positive cytotoxin result obtained directly from the stool specimen was required as laboratory evidence of C. difficile. In the other, a positive result of any of the four laboratory tests was accepted for the laboratory portion of the case definition. No significant difference between the sensitivity of the VIDAS CDA and that of the Culturette brand CDT latex test was found (48 to 58% sensitivity for the CDT latex test and 52 to 63% sensitivity for the VIDAS CDA compared with 93 to 100% sensitivity for culture and 70 to 100% sensitivity for cytotoxin testing). The performance of the VIDAS CDA, however, was hampered by a high percentage of tests (19%) which gave an uninterpretable result.     

Comparison of HeLa 229 and McCoy cell cultures for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in clinical specimens.

Consecutive clinical specimens of Chlamydia trachomatis (1,048) were inoculated in parallel on DEAE-dextran- and cycloheximide-treated HeLa 229 cells and cycloheximide-treated McCoy cells. HeLa 229 cell culture detected 113 positive specimens, and McCoy cell culture detected 103 positive specimens. This difference is not significant. However, HeLa 229 cell culture yielded significantly more inclusions than McCoy cell culture in the 95 specimens positive in both cell types (P = 0.042). For routine diagnostic purposes, a choice for one of the cell types may be determined by local preferences.     

Yield of stool culture with isolate toxin testing versus a two-step algorithm including stool toxin testing for detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile

We examined the incremental yield of stool culture (with toxin testing on isolates) versus our two-step algorithm for optimal detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile. Per the two-step algorithm, stools were screened for C. difficile-associated glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) antigen and, if positive, tested for toxin by a direct (stool) cell culture cytotoxicity neutralization assay (CCNA). In parallel, stools were cultured for C. difficile and tested for toxin by both indirect (isolate) CCNA and conventional PCR if the direct CCNA was negative. The "gold standard" for toxigenic C. difficile was detection of C. difficile by the GDH screen or by culture and toxin production by direct or indirect CCNA. We tested 439 specimens from 439 patients. GDH screening detected all culture-positive specimens. The sensitivity of the two-step algorithm was 77% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70 to 84%), and that of culture was 87% (95% CI, 80 to 92%). PCR results correlated completely with those of CCNA testing on isolates (29/29 positive and 32/32 negative, respectively). We conclude that GDH is an excellent screening test and that culture with isolate CCNA testing detects an additional 23% of toxigenic C. difficile missed by direct CCNA. Since culture is tedious and also detects nontoxigenic C. difficile, we conclude that culture is most useful (i) when the direct CCNA is negative but a high clinical suspicion of toxigenic C. difficile remains, (ii) in the evaluation of new diagnostic tests for toxigenic C. difficile (where the best reference standard is essential), and (iii) in epidemiologic studies (where the availability of an isolate allows for strain typing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing).     

Evaluation of the usefulness of counterimmunoelectrophoresis for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated colitis in clinical specimens.

Results of counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE) were compared with those of isolation of Clostridium difficile and assay for cytotoxicity in HeLa cells. On the basis of 471 stool specimens, CIE exhibited a sensitivity of 38% and a specificity of 88% as compared with the cytotoxin assay. The predictive value of a reactive CIE results is low (17%), whereas the predictive value of a nonreactive CIE result is significant (96%) and therefore warrants its use as a screening test. In addition, stool filtrates may nonspecifically precipitate with the C. difficile antitoxin in the CIE test. Such nonspecific reactions may be identified by simultaneous electrophoresis against nonimmune serum.     

Evaluation of a commercial kit for the routine detection of Clostridium difficile cytotoxin by tissue culture.

The Toxi-titer microtiter plate system (Bartels Immunodiagnostic Supplies, Inc., Bellevue, Wash.) is a simplified procedure for detecting the cytotoxin produced by Clostridium difficile in stool filtrates. In a parallel study of 74 stool specimens, results from the Toxin-titer system compared favorably with those from the conventional system. Our experience with the Toxin-titer system in testing 540 stool specimens was, in general, satisfactory, although a few problems with toxin control did occur. The method requires no specialized experience in tissue culture techniques and can therefore be adopted for routine use in clinical laboratories.     

Comparison of real-time PCR for detection of the tcdC gene with four toxin immunoassays and culture in diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection

We have developed a rapid real-time PCR method using fluorescence resonance energy transfer probes and the LightCycler (Roche Diagnostics), which will detect the presence of the tcdC gene of Clostridium difficile in stool samples. Our PCR method also will identify the presence of base pair deletions, one of which (18 bp) has been associated with the "epidemic" toxin-hyperproducing strains. We compared the results of this PCR with those of three C. difficile toxin-detecting enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), an EIA for the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), and culture of C. difficile. A total of 200 stool specimens were studied by the methods under comparison. C. difficile was isolated from 49 specimens by culture, and 44 of these were confirmed as containing one of the genes associated with toxin production ("toxigenic culture"). Using toxigenic culture as the "gold standard", the sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values, respectively, of the assays were 48%, 98%, 88%, and 87% for the Premier toxin A and B test; 48%, 99%, 91%, and 87% for the ImmunoCard toxin A & B test; 48%, 84%, 46%, and 85% for the Xpect C. difficile toxin A/B test; 32%, 100%, 100%, and 84% for the Triage C. difficile panel (for toxin A); and 86%, 97%, 90%, and 96% for the LightCycler PCR. Thus, in comparison to the sensitivity of toxigenic culture, the sensitivities of the toxin immunoassays were unacceptably low, while the LightCycler real-time PCR assay for the detection of the tcdC gene of C. difficile is sensitive and specific.     

Specific detection of toxigenic strains of Clostridium difficile in stool specimens.

Clostridium difficile is the infectious agent responsible for antibiotic-associated colitis. We report the use of the polymerase chain reaction technique to identify toxigenic strains of C. difficile in human stool specimens. A set of primers based on the nucleotide sequence of the toxin B gene, which amplified a 399-bp fragment from isolates producing toxin B, was designed. We examined 28 known toxigenic strains, which were all positive by this assay. DNAs from the nontoxigenic strains examined and from strains of Clostridium sordellii and C. bifermentans were not amplified with these primers. The sensitivity of this assay allowed us to identify as little as 10% toxigenic C. difficile cells in the presence of 90% nontoxigenic cells and to detect the toxin B gene in 1 pg of DNA from a toxigenic strain. DNAs extracted from 18 clinical stool specimens that were positive for toxin B by the tissue culture cytotoxicity assay were also positive by this assay. In addition, we detected toxin B sequences in DNA from 2 of 18 stool specimens that were negative for toxin B by the cytotoxicity assay. These two stool specimens were from patients who had a clinical pattern of colitis that was compatible with C. difficile causation. This rapid, sensitive assay will be useful for specific identification of toxigenic C. difficile and for revealing cases that are undetected by analysis of fecal samples for toxin B alone.     

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis: usefulness of Premier Cytoclone A+B enzyme immunoassay for combined detection of stool toxins and toxigenic C. difficile strains

Detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in stools by Premier Cytoclone A+B enzyme immunoassay (EIA) was compared with detection by stool culture for C. difficile followed by detection of toxigenic isolates using the same EIA. Chart reviews were performed to evaluate the likelihood of C. difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis (CADC) for all patients with at least one positive toxin assay. While the toxins were detected in 58 of 85 consecutive CADC patients by both assays, CADC in 5 patients was detected only by stool toxin assay, and in 22 patients CADC was detected only by toxigenic culture. Our results suggest that for laboratories using a rapid toxin A+B EIA, direct toxin detection in stools should be combined with toxigenic culture in cases in which there is a negative stool toxin assay.     

Detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A (enterotoxin) and B (cytotoxin) in clinical specimens. Evaluation of a latex agglutination test

A new latex test, Culturette Brand Rapid Latex Test for detection of Clostridium difficile toxin A, was tested on 408 stool samples. In 247 frozen tissue culture supernate specimens previously obtained from patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhea (CAD), the latex test (enterotoxin) was positive in 182 (74%) as compared with 194 (79%) for the repeat tissue culture (P greater than 0.1) cytotoxin (toxin B) test. Testing of 161 fresh stool samples found the latex test superior to tissue culture (P less than 0.05) in cases of CAD (90% positivity vs. 70%), with the two tests being equal in both non-CAD diarrheal and non-diarrheal control groups. In vitro evaluation of 61 C. difficile isolates found all (100%) to be producers of enterotoxin A, while only 53 (87%) produced toxin B. The latex test for C. difficile toxin detection is a rapid, simple test for use in the diagnosis in CAD.     

Clonal dissemination of a toxin-A-negative/toxin-B-positive Clostridium difficile strain from patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea in Poland

Objective To determine the incidence of toxin-A-negative/toxin-B-positive Clostridium difficile strains and their genetic relatedness in the feces of patients suffering from antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in Polish hospitals.
Methods C. difficile strains were cultured from patients' stool samples. The present study characterises these strains with respect to their cytopathogenicity on McCoy cells and the absence of toxin A despite a functional toxin B as determined with commercial test kits (Culturette Brand Toxin CD-TCD toxin A test and C. difficile Tox A/B test). In addition, PCR using different primer pairs aiming at non-repeating or repeating regions of the toxin A and B genes were used to confirm the findings. All toxin A^–B⁺ strains were genetically characterised by random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, PCR ribotyping and, in part, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of DNA macrorestriction fragments.
Results We here present the presence of 17 toxin A^–B⁺ strains among 159 C. difficile strains (11%) isolated from fecal samples from 413 patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea. All 17 strains possessed the toxin B gene, demonstrated a cytopathogenic effect on the McCoy cells, and were positive in the Tox A/B test. Molecular typing of these 17 C. difficile strains revealed that 7 of 17 (41%) toxin A^–/B⁺ C. difficile strains could not be discriminated. It appeared that these strains had a genotype that could not be distinguished from that of a Japanese control strain.
Conclusion Our observations imply that a particular genotype of toxin A^–B⁺ C. difficile has spread extensively, not only in Poland but possibly even worldwide.     

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in Mccoy cell cultures with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies.

We compared two methods for identification of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in McCoy cell monolayers: conventional iodine staining and immunofluorescence staining with monoclonal antibodies against the species-specific major outer membrane protein antigen of C. trachomatis. Among 878 urethral and cervical specimens tested in parallel, the immunofluorescence method detected eightfold more inclusions per monolayer, identified a higher proportion of positive specimens on first passage (98 versus 62% by iodine staining; P less than 0.01), and improved overall sensitivity (98% of total positive specimens detected versus 84% by iodine staining; P less than 0.01). Improved sensitivity was most evident in specimens with low numbers of inclusions. Compared with conventional iodine staining, immunofluorescence staining with monoclonal antibodies improves sensitivity and offers more rapid detection of chlamydial inclusions in cell culture.     

Quantitative microtiter cytotoxicity assay for Shigella toxin.

The cytotoxic activity of Shigella dysenteriae 1 was assayed by exposing HeLa cells in microtiter cultures to dilutions of toxin. Exposure to toxin caused either failure of cells in suspension to attach or detachment of cells from established monolayers. Estimates of toxin potency were made by staining residual cells with crystal violet and visually inspecting the stained plates. Quantitation of the cytotoxic effect was made possible by eluting and spectrophotometrically measuring the stain. The dilution of toxin causing 50% cell detachment, the endpoint chosen for the assay, was estimated from plots of dye absorbance versus toxin dilution. The 50% cell detachment dilution of toxin varied as a function of cell concentration, incubation of toxin with cells in suspension or as established monolayers, and the cell line used for assay. The HeLa cell line was the most sensitive of the cell lines examined. The method was easily utilized to monitor toxin purification and to measure antitoxin neutralization of toxin activity.