The safety of monoclonal antibodies for treatment of colorectal cancer

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Monoclonal antibodies such as bevacizumab, ramucirumab, cetuximab and panitumumab play an important role in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). With the introduction of these drugs considerable improvements in both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were achieved. However these antibodies are associated with a unique side effect profile.

Areas covered: This review provides an overview about drug efficacy of bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab and ramucirumab in the treatment algorithm of mCRC. Additionally, we discuss the most common toxicites of these monoclonal antibodies.

Expert opinion: The most common toxicities associated with the VEGF-A directed antibody bevacizumab are hypertension, proteinuria, thromboembolism, bleeding, gastrointestinal perforation and prolonged wound healing. Similarly, the rate of hypertension and proteinuria is increased during treatment with the VEGFR2 antibody ramucirumab.

On the other hand the most frequent side effects of EGFR targeted antibodies are skin rash, hypersensitivity reactions and hypomagnesemia. Due to the murine portions of cetuximab the incidence of infusion reactions is more frequent compared to panitumumab which is a pure human monoclonal antibody.     

贝伐珠单抗联合化疗一二线治疗不可手术转移性结直肠癌临床观察

目的：评估现实治疗环境中贝伐珠单抗与化疗联合治疗转移性结直肠癌（mCRC）的疗效和毒性。方法：收集2010年10月至2013年4月间接受贝伐珠单抗联合化疗治疗的mCRC患者资料,近期疗效评估采用实体瘤疗效评价标准1.1版;Kaplan-Meier法估计生存时间;毒性评估采用国立癌症研究所不良事件标准3.0版。结果：74例患者入组,男性40例,女性34例;年龄31~74岁,中位年龄55.5岁;结肠癌44例,直肠癌30例;一线和二线治疗各37例;63例患者有可测量病灶,一线、二线治疗的客观有效率（ORR）分别为62.8%、28.6%;一线、二线治疗患者的中位无进展生存时间（PFS）和中位总生存时间（OS）分别为8.7个月、4.4个月和25.3个月、14.6个月;奥沙利铂及伊立替康为基础的化疗方案的中位PFS、中位OS分别为8.1个月、5.8个月和21.9个月、17.1个月,组间无统计学差异（P值分别为0.592和0.506）。全组各级高血压的发生率为9.5%、蛋白尿8.1%、静脉血栓形成2.7%、胃肠穿孔2.7%,伤口愈合综合症4.1%,出血17.6%。结论：贝伐珠单抗联合化疗治疗mCRC有效,贝伐珠单抗相关毒性的总体发生率较低。     

Efficacy and safety of doublet versus single agent as salvage treatment for metastatic breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines and taxanes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the efficacy and safety of doublet versus single agent as salvage treatment for pretreated metastatic breast cancer.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). All clinical studies were independently identified by two authors for inclusion. Demographic data, treatment regimens, objective response rate (ORR), and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were extracted and analyzed using Comprehensive MetaAnalysis software (Version 2.0).

Results: Thirteen RCTs involving 4878 pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients were ultimately identified. The pooled results demonstrated that doublet combination therapy significantly improved ORR (RR 1.13, 95% CI: 1.01–1.27, p?<?.001) and PFS (hazard ration [HR] 0.83, 95% CI: 0.73–0.96, p?=?.011), but not OS (HR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.86–1.01, p?=?.065). Similar results were observed in sub-group analysis according to treatment regimens. Additionally, more incidences of grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression toxicities nausea and fatigue were observed in doublet combination therapy.

Conclusions: In comparison with a single agent alone, doublet combination therapy as salvage treatment for pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients significantly improves ORR and PFS, but not OS. Further studies are recommended to identify patients who will most likely benefit from the appropriate doublet combination therapy.     

Bevacizumab for salvage treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Although various new agents have been developed for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), overall survival rates have changed little in the last half century. We conducted meta-analysis to verify the clinical efficacy of bevacizumab for the salvage treatment of MBC. Event-based hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were derived, and a test of heterogeneity was applied. Four studies, with a total of 2,860 patients, met the inclusion criteria for analysis. The pooled results of clinical efficacies were: HR for progression free survival 0.69 (95% CI, 0.58–0.81, z = 4.54, P <0.001); HR for overall survival 0.92 (95% CI, 0.82–1.03, z =1.44, P = 0.15); and HR for the clinical objective response rate 1.53 (95% CI, 1.37–1.71, z = 7.37, P < 0.001). In terms of overall survival, subgroup analysis demonstrated statistically significant improvement for the bevacizumab combination in the initial therapy subgroup (HR, 0.878; 95% CI, 0.771–0.999, z = 1.98, P = 0.048). Hypertension and proteinura were more common in the bevacizumab combination arm; however, these toxicities were managed with therapy. In conclusion, meta-analysis suggested benefits of a carefully managed bevacizumab-containing salvage regimen for patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed Her-2 negative MBC who have not received previous cytotoxic therapy. This treatment could improve both progression free survival and overall survival rates.     

Emerging VEGF-receptor inhibitors for colorectal cancer

Introduction: Targeted agents have dramatically improved and enriched the therapeutical choices for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). By better understanding the role of the angiogenic pathway in colorectal cancer (CRC), new therapies have been developed. Bevacizumab, the first anti-angiogenetic agent approved for the treatment of mCRC provide a proof of concept since it has improved the progression-free survival and overall survival when combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Areas covered: This review is focused on the most recent findings on the VEGF signaling pathway and new therapeutic drugs explored in clinical trials.

Expert opinion: Despite the advantage offered by bevacizumab, the median overall survival of mCRC patient exceeds 21 months; thus, investigational efforts are needed. Several antiangiogenic agents for the treatment of mCRC are being tested in preclinical and clinical Phase I/II trials. Unfortunately a discrete number of Phase III trials produced negative results. Recently aflibercept and regorafenib, two new antiangiogenic drugs, have been approved as the new-targeted agents for the treatment of mCRC, according to the positive findings from the VELOUR and the CORRECT studies. In order to maximize clinical impact it will be important to validate predictive biomarkers and best combination treatments to offer for mCRC patients; further research and intense investigation is still required.     

First-line bevacizumab,cisplatin and vinorelbine plus maintenance bevacizumab in advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer chemo-naïve patients

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of first-line treatment with bevacizumab, cisplatin and vinorelbine and bevacizumab maintenance in non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Research design and methods: Forty-nine patients with stage IIIB plus pleural effusion or stage IV NSCLC were included in a Phase II clinical trial. Treatment consisted of 3-week cycles of bevacizumab (15 mg/kg on day 1), cisplatin (80 mg/m² on day 1) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m² on days 1 and 8). After 6 cycles, non-progressing patients received bevacizumab maintenance therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results: Thirteen (29%) of 45 evaluable patients presented a partial response. PFS and overall survival were 6.0 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.5 – 7.5) and 14.7 months (95% CI 8.4 – 21), respectively. Fourteen patients (28%) experienced grade 3 – 4 neutropenia and 7 (14%) experienced febrile neutropenia during the combination treatment. During the maintenance phase, the most frequent grade 3 – 4 adverse event was hypertension. Neither grade 3 – 4 thrombocytopenia nor toxic death was observed.

Conclusions: The studied regimen achieved a similar efficacy to other regimens containing platinum doublets. The data provide further evidence that bevacizumab may be used in combination with multiple standard platinum-based doublets in this setting.     

Bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI-3 in chemotherapy-refractory patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in the era of biotherapies

Background: The optimal chemotherapeutic regimen suitable for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients previously treated with 5-fluorouracil (5FU), oxaliplatin, irinotecan and biotherapies remains an unresolved issue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity of bevacizumab combined with FOLFIRI-3 in mCRC after failure of prior chemotherapy including fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and oxaliplatin. Methods: Patients were treated with bevacizumab in combination with FOLFIRI-3 every 14 days. The association between treatment efficacy and visceral fat area as measured by CT scan or Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) change after 2 months was also studied. Results: Forty-nine consecutive patients were treated. Four hundred and twenty four cycles of chemotherapy were delivered. Median follow-up was 11 months. Eleven patients (22.4%) had an objective partial response and 26 (53.1%) were stabilized. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 7 and 13 months respectively. Four grade 4 adverse events occurred (1 digestive perforation, 1 rectal ulcer, 1 pulmonary embolism, and 1 febrile aplasia) but no toxic death was observed. Grade 3 adverse events occurred in 18 patients (38%) including asthenia in 15 patients (30%), nausea and vomiting in 4 patients (8%), diarrhea in 11 patients (22%), anemia in 4 patients (8%), neutropenia in 10 patients (20%) and thrombopenia in 4 patients (8%). Visceral Fat area was significantly lower in responder patients. CEA change at 2 months predicted improved overall survival. Conclusion: This study suggests that bevacizumab combined with FOLFIRI3 may be active in mCRC patients after failure of all classical lines of chemotherapy.     

Erlotinib-based targeted dual agent versus erlotinib alone in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials

Objectives: To compare the effects of an erlotinib-based targeted dual agent with erlotinib alone in previously treated patients with advanced non-small lung cancer (NSCLC).

Patients and methods: The PubMed and Embase databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for publications between January 2005 and March 2016. Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), or data for calculating HRs with 95% CIs were derived. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and toxicity were assessed.

Results: Thirteen trials with a total of 4509 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with erlotinib alone, combination therapy showed no improvement in OS (HR?=?0.95; 95% CI, 0.89–1.02; P?=?.132) though significantly prolonged PFS (HR?=?0.82; 95% CI, 0.75–0.90; P?<?.001). Combination therapy significantly increased ORR (RR?=?1.32; 95% CI, 1.09–1.60; P?=?.005) and DCR (RR?=?1.26; 95% CI, 1.17–1.36, P?<?.001). Sub-analysis assessment failed to identify any sub-groups which could benefit from combination therapy in terms of OS. Combination therapy was associated with more grade 3 or higher toxic effects (RR?=?1.54; 95% CI, 1.22–1.95; P?<?.001). Patients treated with combination therapy had more grade 3 or greater fatigue (RR?=?1.49; 95% CI, 1.16–1.91; P?=?.002), but did not develop more diarrhea (RR?=?2.02; 95% CI, 0.86–4.77; P?=?.107) or rash (RR?=?1.29, 95% CI, 0.90–1.85; P?=?.172). This study had limitations about heterogeneities among the included trials, and the analysis was not based on individual patient data.

Conclusions: Compared with erlotinib alone, the erlotinib-based targeted dual agent showed a minimal magnitude of improvement in PFS but did not improve OS. The role of erlotinib-based combinations in previously treated patients with NSCLC seemed insignificant.     

Emerging drugs for non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80% of all lung cancer cases and is the leading cause of cancer mortality. Despite the optimization of chemotherapy regimens, treatment outcomes for advanced disease are still disappointing. The EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib, and the recombinant monoclonal antibody against the VEGF, bevacizumab, have proven active in NSCLC. In the BR.21 trial, a 2-month benefit in overall survival was observed for previously treated NSCLC patients who received erlotinib versus placebo. The combination of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab yielded superior overall survival or progression-free survival in one randomized trial in advanced non-squamous NSCLC patients. However, despite the introduction of more effective agents, new treatment strategies are clearly needed in lung cancer management.

The review focuses on a number of new targeted agents/chemotherapy drugs now in clinical trials directed at improving NSCLC management. Mature results regarding their activity and usefulness can be expected in the near future.     

Use of bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: report from the Mexican opinion and analysis forum on colorectal cancer treatment with bevacizumab (September 2009)

Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and although associated mortality rates in South American countries are generally among the lowest in the world, they are on the rise. The prognosis of patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer has improved markedly over the last 12 years, increasing from 5 months with best supportive care to almost 2 years with combination chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. New prognostic and predictive biomarkers have been identified to guide therapy. Prognostic markers indicate patient survival independent of therapy and include disease stage, mutational status, and carcinoembryonic antigen. More recently, predictive markers of treatment outcomes have been identified. The most studied are mutations of the KRAS and BRAF genes, which are associated with resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy. Tumor blood vessels have a number of structural and functional abnormalities that result in increased tumor vascularity and growth driven by angiogenesis. The anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody bevacizumab, which binds to and neutralizes VEGF-A, has become a central part of the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The addition of bevacizumab to fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin, irinotecan plus bolus 5-FU/leucovorin, or irinotecan plus infusional 5-FU/leucovorin significantly improves the overall survival of patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. In addition, a significant increase in overall survival is seen when bevacizumab is added to oxaliplatin plus infusional 5-FU/leucovorin (FOLFOX) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who progressed on a non-bevacizumab-containing regimen. Although the majority of studies were performed prior to the identification of KRAS and BRAF as predictive biomarkers, subsequent analysis has shown the benefits of bevacizumab occur independently of the mutational status of these genes. In patients who have progressed on a bevacizumab-containing regimen, continuation of bevacizumab is significantly associated with an improved survival based on observational cohort studies. Surgical resection is recommended in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer where complete removal of tumors can be achieved. Perioperative chemotherapy using FOLFOX for 3 months before and 3 months after surgery is associated with a 9% improvement in 3-year survival. The use of chemotherapy in patients initially deemed unresectable has produced resection rates approaching 40%, and the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in this setting is feasible, safe, and effective. In a study of 219 patients, the addition of bevacizumab to FOLFOX was associated with a significant increase in major or complete pathologic response compared with FOLFOX alone. Improvements in patient survival have changed the treatment paradigm for metastatic colorectal cancer. Newer approaches view treatment not as distinct lines of therapy but as a continuum that includes personalized treatment plans offering maintenance therapy and even drug holidays between aggressive treatment periods. This approach achieves similar efficacy outcomes with reduced toxicity, and investigation of the role of bevacizumab as maintenance therapy is ongoing.     

Lessons from the other side of the Atlantic

In the United States, bevacizumab was approved for use in combination with paclitaxel for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer on the basis of a single trial showing a beneficial impact on progression-free survival, a surrogate endpoint. The indication in breast cancer was withdrawn in 2011 when a new review of the data showed no increase in overall survival. In the European Union, bevacizumab was approved for use in combination with paclitaxel or docetaxel, again based on an improvement in progression-free survival. Following a review of clinical trials using this same endpoint, the indication for combination with paclitaxel was maintained while the indication for combination with docetaxel was withdrawn in 2011. Furthermore, bevacizumab was approved for use in combination with capecitabine on the basis of progression-free survival data.     

XELOX方案与FOLFOX方案治疗转移性结直肠癌的系统评价

目的:评价XELOX方案与FOLFOX方案治疗转移性结直肠癌的有效性和安全性。方法:采用计算机检索Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、维普中文科技期刊全文数据库(VIP)、万方数据库,对符合纳入标准的随机对照试验(RCT)进行质量评价和Meta分析。结果:共纳入9个RCT,包括2120例患者。2种方案在总体应答率、完全应答率、部分应答率、总体生存率、无病进展存活率、中位生存期、中位疾病进展时间上差异均无统计学意义;Ⅰ/Ⅱ级不良反应中XELOX方案的手足综合征(RR=1.99,95%CI(1.07,3.70),P=0.03)、白细胞减少(RR=1.42,95%CI(1.09,1.85),P=0.009)的发生率高于FOLFOX方案,Ⅲ/Ⅳ级不良反应中XELOX方案的腹泻(RR=1.67,95%CI(1.34,2.08),P<0.0001)、手足综合征(RR=4.19,95%C(I2.51,6.98),P<0.0001)、血小板减少(RR=1.80,95%CI(1.26,2.56),P=0.001)的发生率高于FOLFOX方案。结论:XELOX方案治疗转移性结直肠癌的疗效与FOLFOX方案相似,但需密切关注XELOX方案更易发生手足综合征、血小板减少、腹泻的风险。     

Phase II study of bevacizumab in combination with capecitabine as first-line treatment in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

The relative survival of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is generally worse than that of younger patients because of more advanced stage at presentation, comorbidity and reduced use of optimal therapy. We conducted a prospective phase II trial of the combination of bevacizumab and capecitabine in elderly patients with mCRC. In total 41 patients aged more than or equal to 70 years with mCRC, who had not received chemotherapy earlier for metastatic disease, were enroled. Patients received capecitabine (1000 mg/m twice daily on days 1-14) and bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg of body weight on day 1). The treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. The overall response rate was 65%, including 13% of patients with a complete response and 53% of patients with a partial response. A further 13% of patients maintained stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 11.5 months and the median overall survival was 21.2 months. Despite the advanced age of participants, the rate of bevacizumab-related and capecitabine-related adverse events was consistent with that reported earlier in the general mCRC population. The combination of bevacizumab and capecitabine is effective and has a favourable tolerability profile and should be considered as an option for the initial treatment of mCRC in elderly patients.     

Role of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab in the treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Although major progress has been achieved in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer with the employment of biological antiangiogenic agents, several questions remain open for discussion regarding the use of this therapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. In Western countries, the total number of elderly patients with colorectal cancer is expected to increase in the future. As adverse physical or socioeconomic conditions are more common in the elderly, an assessment of the patient's suitability for this therapy should be performed before a treatment decision is made. Most patients in clinical trials of the antiangiogenic drug bevacizumab were aged <65 years and thus the efficacy and tolerability of this agent in older patients has been less well explored. However, this article shows that older and younger patients with metastatic colorectal cancer appeared to derive similar survival benefit from bevacizumab treatment. Elderly patients were also found to have significant prolongation of median progression-free survival with the addition of bevacizumab to their treatment, with a similar magnitude of improvement in this outcome being observed in younger and older patients. It should be emphasized that the patients included in the studies discussed in this article were eligible for clinical trials and therefore may not be representative of a more general elderly population. Careful selection of patients and monitoring of treatment effects are required to optimize use of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab in older patients.     

Angiogenesis inhibitors for patients with ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials

Objectives:

To investigate the effects of angiogenesis inhibitors in the treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent ovarian cancer, a meta-analysis was performed and overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity were assessed.

Patients and methods:

The PubMed and Embase databases, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for publications between January 2000 and June 2015. Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), or data for calculating HRs with 95% CIs were derived.

Results:

The 12 trials in this meta-analysis were divided into three groups: four trials with a VEGF inhibitor (the bevacizumab group), six trials with VEGFR inhibitors (the VEGFRIs group), and two trials with an angiopoietin inhibitor (the trebananib group). PFS improvement was seen in all groups (HR?=?0.61, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.79, P?<?0.001 for bevacizumab; HR?=?0.71, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.87, P?=?0.001 for VEGFRIs; and HR?=?0.67, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.72, P?<?0.001 for trebananib). Regarding OS, bevacizumab showed a trend of improvement (HR?=?0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.01, P?=?0.079), VEGFRIs showed no improvement (HR?=?0.92, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.11, P?=?0.368), and trebananib demonstrated a significant prolongation (HR?=?0.81, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.99, P?=?0.036). Bevacizumab was associated with more class-specific adverse events (RR?=?4.05, 95% CI 1.99 to 8.27, P?<?0.001). Although the toxicity profiles differed, VEGFRIs developed common higher incidences of hypertension, diarrhea, and fatigue. A higher incidence of edema was reported in the trebananib group (RR?=?2.60, 95% CI 0.84 to 8.00, P?=?0.097).

Conclusions:

Anti-angiogenic therapy showed clear PFS benefit with increased toxicity, but its role in OS was undefined for ovarian cancer which emphasized the need for patient selection.     

Small molecule dipeptidylpeptidase IV inhibitors under investigation for diabetes mellitus therapy

Importance of the field: Fluoropyrimidines with oxaliplatin or irinotecan, bevacizumab, cetuximab and panitumumab constitute the drugs currently approved by the FDA for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients who have progressed on the approved drugs pose a major challenge for medical oncologists, as the therapeutic choices outside the context of a clinical trial are limited.

Areas covered in this review: Mitomycin C is an old drug that acts synergistically with capecitabine and irinotecan. Relevant studies were identified in PubMed (years 1950 – 2009), Ovid, Cochrane database and the American Society of Clinical Oncology abstracts (years 1995 – 2009) using the following search terms: mitomycin C, fluorouracil, capecitabine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and colorectal cancer. Only studies using the combination of mitomycin C with one of the aforementioned agents were selected.

What the reader will gain: An overview of the clinical trials where mitomycin has been used in combination with modern compounds in the various settings of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Take home message: Mitomycin C combinations are less efficacious than modern drugs in the first-line treatment of colorectal cancer. However, they are acceptable alternatives for best supportive care in colorectal cancer that is refractory to standard regimens, as they show some modest efficacy at low cost.     

Hypertension as a predictive factor of effect of bevacizumab in treatment of colorectal cancer

Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody that targets vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) for treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Recently, much evidence has suggested that bevacizumab-induced hypertension might be predictive of the effect of bevacizumab. The aim of our study is to retrospectively assess the relationship between the onset of hypertension and the activity of bevacizumab in Japanese metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Between July 2007 and December 2010, 36 patients (median age 66 years; 36-81 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer were assigned to receive bevacizumab in combination with either mFOLFOX6 (5-FU, levofolinate and oxaliplatin) or FOLFIRI (5-FU, levofolinate and irinotecan) at the Tokushima University Hospital. A patient who had increase by >20 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure or had increase to >150/100 mmHg or received antihypertensive treatment was defined as hypertensive. The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the hypertensive group (n=10) and non-hypertensive group (n=26). ORR and DCR were 60.0% and 100%, respectively, in the hypertensive group and ORR and DCR were 23.1% and 80.8%, respectively, in the non-hypertensive group. These differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). The median PFS tended to be longer in the hypertensive group (65.0 weeks) than in the non-hypertensive group (40.0 weeks). Our data suggested that bevacizumab-induced hypertension may be predictive of the effect of bevacizumab in Japanese metastatic colorectal cancer patients.     

Patient-reported outcomes in RELAY,a phase 3 trial of ramucirumab plus erlotinib versus placebo plus erlotinib in untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

Abstract

Objective

In the phase 3 RELAY trial, ramucirumab/erlotinib demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) over placebo/erlotinib in patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC (median PFS 19.4 versus 12.4?months; HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46–0.76; p?<?.0001). Safety was consistent with established profiles for ramucirumab and erlotinib in NSCLC. Here, we present patient-reported outcomes.     

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ramucirumab in the treatment of colorectal cancer

Introduction: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide. The prognosis of colorectal cancer patients still remains dismal and half of them will develop metastatic disease. Angiogenesis plays an essential role in colorectal tumorigenesis, and the VEGF pathway is one of the targets that has been validated up to now. The use of antiangiogenics along with chemotherapy has become an accepted standard for colorectal cancer.

Areas covered: This review discusses the efficacy and safety profile of ramucirumab, a fully human immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody against the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2), for the treatment of second-line metastatic colorectal cancer upon progression to first-line chemotherapy including anti-angiogenics.

Expert opinion: Ramucirumab in combination with chemotherapy represents a valid option in second-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer patients, who progressed on previous bevacizumab-based combinations. This agent demonstrates a similar benefit in terms of overall survival to other angiogenesis inhibitors (bevacizumab and ziv-aflibercept) used in this setting.     

转移性结肠癌药物治疗的研究进展

已有转移灶的转移性结肠癌(CRC)病人的5年生存率小于10%。接受氟尿嘧啶(FU)/亚叶酸(LV)治疗的中位生存期大约为12 mo。以FU/LV为基础制剂,联合不同抗肿瘤药物(奥沙利铂、伊立替康、卡培他滨、贝伐单珠抗)的新联合疗法对晚期结肠癌的疗效、中位生存期、生活质量等在不同程度上有所改善和提高。本文就转移结肠癌的治疗进展作一综述。