Rotigotine vs ropinirole in advanced stage Parkinson's disease: A double-blind study

ObjectiveTo confirm the superiority of transdermal rotigotine up to 16 mg/24 h over placebo, and non-inferiority to ropinirole, in Japanese Parkinson's disease (PD) patients on concomitant levodopa therapy.MethodsThis trial was a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, three-arm parallel group placebo- and ropinirole-controlled trial. Four-hundred and twenty PD patients whose motor symptoms were not well controlled by levodopa treatment were randomized 2:2:1 to receive rotigotine, ropinirole (up to 15 mg/day) or placebo during a 16-week treatment period followed by a 4-week taper period. The primary variable was change in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III (ON state) sum score from baseline to the end of the treatment period.ResultsThe difference in the change in the UPDRS Part III (ON state) sum score from baseline to the end of treatment between rotigotine and placebo groups was −6.4 ± 1.2 (95% CI: −8.7 to −4.1; p < 0.001), indicating superiority of rotigotine over placebo. The difference between rotigotine and ropinirole groups was −1.4 ± 1.0 (95% CI: −3.2 to 0.5), below the non-inferiority margin, indicating the non-inferiority of rotigotine to ropinirole. Application site reaction was seen in 57.7% of the patients in the rotigotine group and in 18.6% in the ropinirole group (P < 0.001). No other safety issue was noted.ConclusionsRotigotine was well tolerated at doses up to 16 mg/24 h and showed similar efficacy to ropinirole except that the application site reaction was much higher in the rotigotine group.     

Clinical evaluation of ropinirole controlled-release formulation at 18–24 mg/day in Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease

IntroductionThere has been no clinical data on Japanese patients with Parkinson's disease with which to examine whether motor symptoms improve and to assess the safety profile after the dose of ropinirole was increased in those who had not achieved an optimal response to the ropinirole immediate-release formulation 15 mg/day or the controlled-release (CR) formulation 16 mg/day.MethodsThis was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind study, followed by an open-label, long-term study. Participants were randomized at a ratio of 3:1 to the high-dose ropinirole CR (18–24 mg/day) group or the maintenance ropinirole CR 16 mg/day group.ResultsIn the high-dose ropinirole CR group (N = 61), the Japanese unified Parkinson's disease rating scale Part III total score at week 12 was significantly decreased compared with the baseline total score (−4.8 ± 5.95, [95% CI, −6.3 to −3.2], p < 0.001). However, a comparable decrease was also observed in the maintenance ropinirole CR 16 mg/day group (N = 20) (−5.7 ± 5.18, [95% CI, −8.1 to −3.3]), with no statistically significant difference in the adjusted mean change between the high-dose and maintenance groups (0.5 [95% CI, −2.4 to 3.4]). Plasma drug concentrations increased at doses higher than 16 mg/day, but did not increase significantly in a dose-dependent manner at doses of 18–24 mg/day. No adverse events were found that would affect the known safety profile of ropinirole.ConclusionThis study did not demonstrate the difference in efficacy between the high-dose ropinirole CR group and the maintenance ropinirole CR group.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01929317.     

Randomized trial of IPX066, carbidopa/levodopa extended release,in early Parkinson's disease

ObjectiveIPX066 is an extended release carbidopa/levodopa formulation designed to rapidly attain and maintain therapeutic plasma concentrations for a prolonged duration, allowing dosing intervals of approximately 6 h. The objective was to assess the efficacy, safety, and impact on quality of life of IPX066 in the treatment of levodopa-naive Parkinson's disease (PD) patients.MethodsThis was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 30-week study of 381 levodopa-naïve patients assigned to placebo or IPX066 containing 145, 245 or 390 mg of levodopa administered three times daily (TID). The primary efficacy measure was change from Baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) activities of daily living (Part II) + motor scores (Part III), at 30 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included UPDRS total and subscores, patient and clinician global impressions (PGI-I, CGI-I), and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39).ResultsAll IPX066 dosages were superior to placebo throughout the study and at 30 weeks (P < 0.0001). The mean improvement in UPDRS Parts II + III at 30 weeks compared to baseline was 11.7, 12.9, and 14.9 points for the three dosages and 0.6 points for placebo (P < 0.0001, all dosages). PDQ-39 total scores improved with IPX066 (P ≤ 0.034, all dosages). The most commonly reported adverse events with IPX066 included nausea, dizziness, and headache. No unexpected drug-related serious adverse events were reported.ConclusionIPX066 provided significant clinical benefits at the three dosages tested compared to placebo and was well tolerated in levodopa-naive PD patients. Of the dosages tested, IPX066 145 mg TID appeared to provide the best overall balance between efficacy and safety.     

Rotigotine and specific non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease: Post hoc analysis of RECOVER

BackgroundNon-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) represent major causes of morbidity. RECOVER, a randomized controlled trial of rotigotine transdermal system, was the first prospective controlled trial to use the Non-Motor Symptoms Scale (NMSS) as an exploratory outcome for assessment of treatment effects on non-motor symptoms in PD. Rotigotine improved NMSS total score compared with placebo, and the “Sleep/fatigue” and “Mood/apathy” domains. This post hoc analysis further characterizes the effects of rotigotine on sleep/fatigue and mood/apathy.MethodsPatients with PD and unsatisfactory early-morning motor impairment were randomized to transdermal patches of rotigotine (2–16 mg/24 h) or placebo. Treatment was titrated to optimal dose over 1–8 weeks, maintained for 4 weeks. The NMSS was assessed at baseline and end of treatment. Post hoc analyses are presented for individual items of the “Sleep/fatigue” and “Mood/apathy” domains. The interpretation of p-values is considered exploratory in nature.ResultsOf 287 patients randomized, NMSS data were available for 267 patients (178 rotigotine, 89 placebo). Within the “Sleep/fatigue” domain there was a significant difference, in favor of rotigotine, in change from baseline score in 1 of 5 items: “fatigue (tiredness) or lack of energy” (ANCOVA, p < 0.0001). Within the “Mood/apathy” domain, there were significant differences in favor of rotigotine in 4 of 7 items: “lost interest in surroundings” (p < 0.0001), “lost interest in doing things” (p < 0.0001), “seems sad or depressed” (p < 0.01), and “difficulty experiencing pleasure” (p < 0.05).ConclusionsRotigotine transdermal system may improve non-motor symptoms such as fatigue, symptoms of depression, anhedonia, and apathy in patients with PD; further prospective controlled studies are required to confirm this post hoc analysis.     

Long-term study of ropinirole patch in Parkinson's disease patients with/without basal l-dopa

IntroductionA dopamine agonist patch could be an important treatment option for Parkinson's disease. This study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of the ropinirole hydrochloride patch. The steady state plasma ropinirole concentration was also assessed.MethodsIn a multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled study, Parkinson's disease patients with/without basal levodopa and with/without prior dopamine agonist therapy (any of these four regimens) received application of a ropinirole patch once daily for up to 52 weeks with unforced titration from 8 to 64 mg. For patients with prior dopamine agonist therapy, the initial dose of ropinirole patch was determined from the prior dopamine agonist dose by using a conversion table.ResultsMost adverse events were mild or moderate. All application site adverse events were mild, except for moderate application site erythema in one patient. In patients with prior dopamine agonist therapy, switching to ropinirole patch did not lead to a significant early increase of adverse events. A change from baseline in the UPDRS Part III total score, the primary efficacy endpoint, showed improvement until Week 16 compared with baseline, followed by little subsequent change until Week 52, indicating maintenance of efficacy. The plasma ropinirole concentration was at steady state throughout the study period and showed a dose-proportional increase.ConclusionOnce-daily application of ropinirole patch showed long-term efficacy and safety (52 weeks) for Parkinson's disease. Switching from other dopamine agonists to ropinirole patch was effective and safe. The plasma ropinirole concentration was at steady state throughout the study period and showed a dose-proportional increase.     

Randomized,placebo-controlled trial of trimethobenzamide to control nausea and vomiting during initiation and continued treatment with subcutaneous apomorphine injection

BackgroundNausea and vomiting can occur in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients initiated on apomorphine subcutaneous injections and antiemetic prophylaxis is recommended per product labeling. Data suggest long-term antiemetic prophylaxis may not be needed, although this has not been systematically studied.MethodsWe evaluated coadministered trimethobenzamide with apomorphine in 182 PD subjects using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, with phased withdrawal of subjects from trimethobenzamide to placebo. Evaluations included presence/absence of nausea and vomiting; Index of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching (INVR); subject evaluation of medication; Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score; “on” response post-injection; and safety assessments.ResultsIncidence of nausea and/or vomiting on Day 1 of apomorphine initiation (primary endpoint) was not significantly different between trimethobenzamide and placebo. Over a longer period, a significantly lower incidence was found for trimethobenzamide during Period 1 (Days 1–28, p = 0.025) and Period 2 (Days 29–56, p = 0.005), with no difference during Period 3 (Days 57–84). INVR results were generally more favorable with trimethobenzamide than placebo in Period 1 and significantly more favorable in Period 2. The majority of subjects in both groups achieved an “on” response after apomorphine injection at all assessments. No significant differences were found between groups for UPDRS motor scores. No added safety risk with concomitant use of trimethobenzamide and apomorphine was found.ConclusionOur data suggest that trimethobenzamide helps reduce nausea/vomiting during the first 8 weeks of apomorphine therapy, but is generally not needed thereafter. Trimethobenzamide did not worsen parkinsonism nor affect “on” response after apomorphine injection.     

Dose optimization of apomorphine sublingual film for treating “OFF” episodes in Parkinson's disease

IntroductionApomorphine sublingual film is approved for the “on-demand” treatment of “OFF” episodes in Parkinson's disease (PD). Patients must undergo dose titration to determine their most effective and tolerable dose. We assessed whether higher doses than those that provide an initial “ON” response could yield more effective treatment.MethodsPatients with PD were assessed in the “OFF” state and the apomorphine sublingual film dose was titrated to a level that provided a tolerable “ON” response. The dose was then increased by up to two dose levels, if tolerated. A comparison in the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III scores was made following administration of the dose that provided the initial “ON” response and following the higher dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events were also reported.ResultsThirty-five patients were titrated to higher apomorphine sublingual film doses than those that provided an initial “ON” response. A mean improvement in MDS-UPDRS Part III score was observed compared with the initial dose of 5.6 points (P = 0.034), 4.4 points (P = 0.009), and 3.7 points (P = 0.018) at 30, 60, and 90 min postdose, respectively. Adverse events were mild or moderate and resolved with dose reduction without concomitant treatment.ConclusionHigher doses of apomorphine sublingual film than those initially perceived to provide an “ON” response can be tolerated and provide additional improvement in motor function in many patients.     

Comparison of IPX066 with carbidopa–levodopa plus entacapone in advanced PD patients

BackgroundIPX066, an investigational extended-release carbidopa–levodopa (CD-LD) preparation, has demonstrated a rapid attainment and prolonged maintenance of therapeutic LD plasma concentrations in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). This phase-3 crossover study assessed its efficacy and safety vs. CD-LD plus entacapone (CL + E).MethodsAt baseline, all patients had motor fluctuations despite a stable regimen of CL + E or CD-LD-entacapone combination tablets (CLE). The study included a 6-week conversion from CL + E or CLE to IPX066, followed by two 2-week, double-blind crossover treatment periods in randomized order, one on IPX066 (and placebo CL + E), the other on CL + E (and placebo IPX066), separated by 1-week open-label IPX066 treatment. The primary efficacy measure was mean percent daily “off” time during waking hours (from patient diaries).ResultsOf 91 randomized patients, 84 completed the study. Their median daily LD dosage was 1495 mg from IPX066 and 600 mg from CL + E, corresponding, after correction for bioavailability, to an approximately 22% higher LD exposure on IPX066. Compared with CL + E, IPX066 demonstrated a lower percent “off” time (24.0% vs. 32.5%; p < 0.0001), lower “off” time (3.8 vs. 5.2 h/day; p < 0.0001), and higher “on” time without troublesome dyskinesia (11.4 vs. 10.0 h/day; p < 0.0001). Other endpoints, including patient-reported treatment preference, also favored IPX066 (p < 0.05). During double-blind treatment, 20.2% and 13.6% of patients reported adverse events on IPX066 and CL + E, respectively. The most common were dyskinesia (4 patients), insomnia (3), and confusional state (3) for IPX066, and fall (2) for CL + E.ConclusionsIn advanced PD, IPX066 showed improved efficacy, compared with CL + E, and appeared to be well tolerated.     

Levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel in advanced Parkinson's: Final results of the GLORIA registry

IntroductionThis registry evaluated the 24-month safety and efficacy of levodopa-carbidopa intestinal gel (LCIG) treatment in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients under routine clinical care.MethodsMotor fluctuations, dyskinesia, non-motor symptoms, quality of life, and safety were evaluated. Observations were fully prospective for treatment-naïve patients (60% of patients) and partially retrospective for patients with ≤12 months of pre-treatment with LCIG (40% of patients). Hours of “On” and “Off” time were assessed with a modified version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part IV items 32 and 39.ResultsOverall, 375 patients were enrolled by 75 movement disorder centers in 18 countries and 258 patients completed the registry. At 24 months LCIG treatment led to significant reductions from baseline in “Off” time (hours/day) (mean ± SD = −4.1 ± 3.5, P < 0.001), “On” time with dyskinesia (hours/day) (−1.1 ± 4.8, P = 0.006), Non-Motor Symptom Scale total (−16.7 ± 43.2, P < 0.001) and individual domains scores, and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-8 item total score (−7.1 ± 21.0, P < 0.001). Adverse events deemed to have a possible/probable causal relationship to treatment drug/device were reported in 194 (54%) patients; the most frequently reported were decreased weight (6.7%), device related infections (5.9%), device dislocations (4.8%), device issues (4.8%), and polyneuropathy (4.5%).ConclusionsLCIG treatment led to sustained improvements in motor fluctuations, non-motor symptoms particularly sleep/fatigue, mood/cognition and gastrointestinal domains, as well as quality of life in advanced PD patients over 24 months. Safety events were consistent with the established safety profile of LCIG.     

Mavoglurant (AFQ056) in combination with increased levodopa dosages in Parkinson's disease patients

Long-term use of levodopa (L-dopa) in patients with Parkinson's disease is associated with development of dyskinesia. This study explored whether Parkinson's disease patients with L-dopa-induced dyskinesia experience improved OFF-time from higher L-dopa doses without worsening of dyskinesias when receiving adjunctive mavoglurant. Patients with moderate-to-severe L-dopa-induced dyskinesia were randomized to receive mavoglurant or placebo. Mavoglurant (AFQ056) was up-titrated over two weeks from 25 mg twice daily (bid) to 100 mg bid (L-dopa kept stable), followed by three weeks during which the daily L-dopa dosage was increased by up to 300 mg/day. A sample size of 30 was initially planned; however, the study was terminated prematurely due to enrollment challenges. OFF-time showed greater improvements in the mavoglurant group (n = 7) compared with the placebo group (n = 7); difference at week 5 was –2.77 h (90% confidence interval –5.44, –0.09 h; p = 0.09). ON-time without troublesome dyskinesia increased more from baseline to week 5 in the mavoglurant group (4.38 h) versus the placebo group (0.63 h). Clinician-rated measures were conflicting. The Modified Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale scores showed a slight improvement with mavoglurant compared with placebo, while the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale parts III and IV worsened slightly with mavoglurant compared with placebo. Due to the low patient numbers and conflicting clinician-rated outcomes data, our findings are not conclusive. However, our results suggest that mavoglurant combined with higher doses of L-dopa may be effective in treating patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing L-dopa-related motor fluctuations and dyskinesias.     

Rasagiline adjunct therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease: Post hoc analyses of the PRESTO and LARGO trials

BackgroundRasagiline was safe and effective when used as adjunct therapy with levodopa in patients with moderate-to-advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) in the phase III PRESTO and LARGO studies.ObjectiveTo assess clinical effects of rasagiline 1 mg/day on cardinal PD symptoms and motor fluctuations in defined patient subgroups using pooled data from PRESTO and LARGO.MethodsBoth double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled studies included PD patients with motor fluctuations despite optimized therapy with levodopa, with or without concomitant dopamine agonists (DA) or catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor (COMT-I) treatment. These post hoc analyses measured effects of rasagiline 1 mg vs placebo on individual cardinal PD symptoms during ON time and mean change from baseline in daily OFF time in subgroups of patients who at baseline were receiving only levodopa, were considered “mild fluctuators” (daily OFF time ≤ 4 h), and who were or were not receiving concomitant DA or COMT-I therapy.ResultsCompared with placebo, rasagiline significantly improved all cardinal PD symptoms and significantly reduced adjusted mean daily OFF time when used as first adjunct therapy in levodopa-treated patients and in patients with mild motor fluctuations. Significant improvement in motor fluctuations was reported with rasagiline regardless of concomitant DA or COMT-I use. Overall incidence of dopaminergic adverse events did not increase with concomitant DA or COMT-I use.ConclusionRasagiline was an effective first adjunct therapy in levodopa-treated patients; benefited patients with signs of early “wearing off”; improved all cardinal PD symptoms; and further improved symptoms in patients already receiving other adjunctive dopaminergic treatment.     

Early treatment benefits of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations

We performed a retrospective analysis of the Efficacy And Safety Evaluation in Parkinson's Disease (EASE‐PD) Adjunct Study, assessing the minimum time to symptom improvement after initiation of ropinirole prolonged release (2–24 mg/day) versus placebo in patients with moderate‐to‐advanced PD not optimally controlled with levodopa. Ropinirole prolonged release was superior to placebo at Week 2 for change from baseline in “off” time (adjusted mean treatment difference [AMTD] – 0.7 hours; 95% confidence interval [CI], –1.1, –0.2; P = 0.0029), and “on” time without troublesome dyskinesia (0.4 hours; 95%CI, 0.01, 0.88; P = 0.0444). At Week 4, improvements were seen in change from baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale total motor score (AMTD, –3.1; 95%CI, –4.4, –1.8; P < 0.0001), activities of daily living score (AMTD, –1.1; 95%CI, –1.7, –0.5; P = 0.0004), and the cardinal symptoms of PD compared with placebo. These analyses indicate that once‐daily, adjunctive ropinirole prolonged release can offer PD symptom control 2 weeks after treatment initiation. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Long-term,open-label,safety study of once-daily ropinirole extended/prolonged release in early and advanced Parkinson's disease

Long-term safety of once-daily ropinirole extended/prolonged release (ropinirole XL/PR) was evaluated in subjects with early and advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) in this study, 101468/248. Subjects (n = 419) who completed one of three prior studies evaluating ropinirole XL/PR for the treatment of PD were enrolled in this open-label, multicenter, extension study, and were to be followed for up to 73 months. Ropinirole XL/PR was titrated/continued, and adjusted as appropriate during the maintenance phase (maximum 24 mg/d). Levodopa (L-dopa) and other nondopamine agonist PD medications were permitted. Safety outcomes that were investigated included frequency of adverse events (AEs). Subjects’ preference regarding once daily versus three times daily study medication regimens was also investigated in a subset of the study population. The median duration of ropinirole XL/PR exposure was 1275 d. Most subjects (87%) reported at least one AE, with the most common (≥ 10%) AEs being, back pain (14%), hallucinations (13%), somnolence (11%) and peripheral edema (11%). Twenty-five percent of subjects discontinued the study prematurely due to an AE during the treatment period. Long-term treatment with ropinirole XL/PR was not associated with any new or unexpected safety concerns in patients with early and advanced PD, and a majority of subjects preferred the once-daily dosing regimen.     

Efficacy and safety of tolcapone in levodopa-treated Parkinson's disease patients with “wearing-off” phenomenon: a multicentre,double-blind,randomized, placebo-controlled trial

To assess the effect of tolcapone added to levodopa plus benserazide or carbidopa on the “wearing-off” phenomenon in patients with Parkinson's disease, we undertook a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of tolcapone 50, 200, or 400 mg three times daily (t.i.d.) for 6 weeks in addition to levodopa therapy. We studied 154 parkinsonian patients, aged 40 years or more, who presented with the “wearing-off” phenomenon despite “optimal” antiparkinsonian therapy. The main outcome measures were “on”- and “off”-time, Investigator's Global Assessments, Subscales of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, changes in levodopa dosage, and safety and tolerability. Tolcapone was more effective than placebo in reducing the “wearing-off” phenomenon between baseline and week 6 at all three dosages. Tolcapone 200 mg t.i.d. increased “on”-time from 37.9% of the waking day to 50.8% (p < 0.01) and reduced “off”-time from 26.7% of the waking day to 16.4% (p < 0.05). Tolcapone treatment was generally well tolerated at all dosages. Initial exacerbation of adverse dopaminergic effects was controlled by levodopa dosage adjustment; at week 6, the mean total daily levodopa dosage had decreased by 80 mg, from 694 mg at baseline, in the tolcapone 200 mg t.i.d. group (p < 0.01). We conclude that the addition of tolcapone to levodopa plus a decarboxylase inhibitor effectively and safely reduces the “wearing-off” phenomenon in parkinsonian patients.     

Efficacy and safety of safinamide as an add-on therapy to L-DOPA for patients with Parkinson's disease: A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled,phase II/III study

IntroductionSafinamide is a reversible and selective monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) and sodium channel inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy in mid-to late-stage Parkinson's disease (PD) as an adjunct to l-DOPA. This study aimed to confirm the efficacy and safety of safinamide in PD patients with wearing-off.MethodsThis 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study included Japanese PD patients with wearing-off on l-DOPA treatment. Patients were randomized to receive placebo (P), safinamide 50 mg/day (S50), or safinamide 100 mg/day (S100). The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in mean daily ON-time without troublesome dyskinesias (ON-time). Other measures included the changes in mean daily OFF-time, the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) score, and the PDQ-39 summary index.ResultsA total of 406 subjects were randomized, of whom 349 completed the study. Baseline characteristics were balanced. Differences in the change of mean daily ON-time at Week 24 compared with the P group were 1.39 h (p = 0.0002) in the S50 group and 1.66 h (p < 0.0001) in the S100 group. Changes from baseline in mean daily OFF-time, UPDRS Part II total score (OFF phase), UPDRS Part III total score (ON phase), and UPDRS Part I also showed significant improvements. Adverse events occurred in 58.9%, 60.2%, and 61.4% of the P, S50, and S100 groups, respectively. The most common adverse drug reactions were dyskinesias (2.1%, 8.3%, and 10.6%) and visual hallucinations (1.4%, 3.0%, and 4.5%).ConclusionAs an adjunct to l-DOPA, safinamide safely increased ON-time and improved PD symptoms/signs in PD patients with wearing-off.     

An open‐label conversion study of pramipexole to ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease

Ropinirole prolonged release (PR) is a once daily oral dopamine agonist approved for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). The goal of this 4 week, open‐label study was to determine the most effective conversion ratio with the fewest adverse effects (AEs) when switching from pramipexole to ropinirole PR. Sixty patients with PD taking pramipexole were converted overnight to ropinirole PR at ratios of 1:3, 1:4, or 1:5 such that 20 consecutive subjects were enrolled in each group. Ropinirole PR dose adjustments were allowed to maintain efficacy or to reduce AEs. An overnight switch from pramipexole to ropinirole PR was found to be well tolerated and AEs were typical for a dopamine agonist. The most common AEs were worsening of PD symptoms, dizziness, somnolence, and nausea, the majority of which resolved after dose adjustments. Thirteen subjects discontinued ropinirole PR before 4 weeks. These subjects were taking a significantly greater dose of pramipexole, the majority greater than 4 mg/day, and tended to have longer disease durations. A conversion ratio of 1 mg of pramipexole to 4 mg of ropinirole PR resulted in the fewest discontinuations of ropinirole PR, the fewest dose adjustments and the largest percentage of subjects that preferred ropinirole PR. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society     

Randomized clinical trial of topiramate for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease

BackgroundThe antiepileptic drug topiramate reduces levodopa-induced dyskinesia without exacerbating parkinsonism in animal models. We report a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in patients with Parkinson's disease and levodopa-induced dyskinesia.MethodsFifteen patients with Parkinson's disease and stable levodopa-induced dyskinesia were enrolled into the study, of whom 13 were randomized to topiramate or placebo. The study medication was titrated to 100 mg/day over four weeks, and assessments were carried out after a further two weeks. Dyskinesia severity assessed by a blinded rater from video recordings was the primary outcome measure.ResultsSeven patients (mean age 58.9 ± 12.8 years) completed the study. Patients taking topiramate vs. placebo showed a significant increase in dyskinesia severity compared to baseline (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.043). Five patients withdrew from the study whilst taking topiramate due to adverse effects.ConclusionsTopiramate tended to worsen dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease, and was poorly tolerated.     

Sustained efficacy of apomorphine in Japanese patients with advanced Parkinson's disease

BackgroundThis report presents data from one of the first trials of apomorphine rescue treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) conducted in Japan. This 3 month trial aimed to evaluate the sustainability of efficacy of intermittent apomorphine rescue treatment.MethodsA phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in PD patients (n = 31) with motor fluctuations in spite of individually titrated treatment with levodopa and other anti PD. Intermittent treatment was titrated to the maintenance dose with a subsequent unblind 12-week outpatient phase. At the week-12 visit, response to apomorphine or placebo was assessed as primary efficacy endpoint using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III (Motor Examination) under double-blind crossover conditions.ResultsIn the crossover phase (n = 28), least squares mean changes in the UPDRS part III score from pre-dose were −24.5 points with apomorphine and −2.3 points with placebo, showing that apomorphine, compared with placebo, provided a significantly greater improvement in the UPDRS part III score change (difference between treatments: –22.1 [95% confidence interval, –27.8, –16.4]; P < 0.001). The most frequently reported adverse events during the study were increased eosinophil count (8 patients), nausea (7), somnolence (6), dyskinesia (5), yawning (5), and decreased blood pressure (3).ConclusionsOur results indicate that a 3-month use of intermittent apomorphine is an effective rescue therapy for “off” episodes in advanced PD patients.     

Pharmacologic treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease: A meta-analysis of COMT inhibitors and MAO-B inhibitors

ObjectiveTo perform a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors or monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitors in addition to levodopa versus levodopa alone for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD).MethodsA systematic literature search was performed between 1990 and October 2007. The primary outcome measures assessed were the reduction in scores of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total, activities of daily living (ADL) and motor scores from baseline. Other efficacy and safety endpoints were also evaluated.ResultsA total of 13 trials (n = 3775 subjects) were included in the meta-analysis. As compared to placebo, COMT and MAO-B inhibitor use resulted in greater improvement in UPDRS total score (weighted mean difference [WMD] ?2.13, 95%CI ?0.46 to ?0.20; and WMD ?5.03, 95%CI ?7.38 to ?2.68) ADL scores (WMD ?0.99, 95%CI ?1.56 to ?0.43; and WMD ?1.48, 95%CI ?2.13 to ?0.83) and motor scores (WMD ?1.50, 95%CI ?2.70 to ?0.30; and WMD ?3.19, 95%CI ?4.57 to ?1.80) as well as increase in “on” time, reduction in “off” time and decreased need in levodopa dose compared to placebo. Incidences of dyskinesia were significantly higher with the COMT and MAO-B inhibitors compared to placebo.ConclusionThe use of COMT or MAO-B inhibitors plus levodopa is superior to levodopa alone at reducing PD symptoms in patients with advanced PD. While combination therapies with COMT or MAO-B inhibitor plus levodopa seem especially useful amongst PD patients with wearing-off phenomenon, they are associated with more adverse events.     

Open-label titration of apomorphine sublingual film in patients with Parkinson's disease and “OFF” episodes

IntroductionThe efficacy and safety of apomorphine sublingual film (APL-130277; APL) for the on-demand treatment of “OFF” episodes associated with Parkinson's disease (PD) was demonstrated in a double-blind trial. Herein we describe the ability of patients to receive effective and tolerable APL dose titration during the open-label titration phase.MethodsAdult patients with levodopa-responsive PD and “OFF” episodes were enrolled. In practically defined “OFF,” patients were observed for a FULL “ON” after their usual morning carbidopa/levodopa (CD/LD) dose and then after titration with APL following each increasing dose (10–35 mg). Antiemetic medication was administered for 3 days before initiation of titration and was continued throughout titration. Motor responses were evaluated predose and postdose using Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III score. Safety outcomes were evaluated.ResultsAmong 141 patients who enrolled in the study and received APL during open-label titration, 109 (77.3%) achieved a FULL “ON” (66.1% at 10–20 mg) and 10 did not. Patients who successfully completed APL dose titration tended to be younger, had a longer mean time since PD diagnosis, and had lower levodopa requirements than those who discontinued during titration for any reason. Change in MDS-UPDRS Part III scores from predose to 30 min postdose after titration with the effective dose of APL (n = 109) was similar across all dose groups. In a post hoc analysis, the magnitude of motor response with APL was ~2-fold higher than with CD/LD 15 min postdose, and the observed peak response occurred earlier with APL than with the trend seen for CD/LD (45 vs 90 min, respectively). Overall, the most common (≥10%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) during APL dose titration were nausea (20.6%), yawning (12.1%), dizziness (11.3%), and somnolence (11.3%). Twelve patients discontinued due to TEAEs during APL dose titration, most commonly (≥2%) because of dizziness (2.8%), nausea (2.1%), and somnolence (2.1%).ConclusionAmong eligible patients with PD and “OFF” episodes who had their APL dose successfully titrated to an effective and tolerable level, most were able to do so within the first 3 titrated doses but some required further dose escalations. The use of APL can provide benefit for the treatment of “OFF” episodes.