Interhemispheric transfer of paired associative stimulation-induced plasticity in the human motor cortex

To evaluate the interhemispheric interaction of paired associative stimulation (PAS)-induced plasticity, we performed a transcranial magnetic stimulation study on nine healthy volunteers after PAS, motor evoked potentials were significantly enhanced in both the nonstimulated and stimulated primary motor cortex (M1). Short-interval intracortical inhibition and intracortical facilitation were not changed in the nonstimulated M1, but interhemispheric inhibition was significantly reduced after PAS. Motor evoked potential enhancement in the nonstimulated M1 was significantly correlated to that in the stimulated M1 and tended to correlate with the degree of pre-PAS interhemispheric inhibition. These results show that PAS-induced plasticity in the dominant M1 can transfer to contralateral M1 depending on the amount of plastic change induced in the stimulated M1 and, also probably, on the amount of transcallosal connection.     

Age dependence of primary motor cortex plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: The increase of elderly population prompted growing research for the understanding of cerebral phenomena sustaining learning abilities, with inclusion of long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity phenomena. Aim of the present study was to characterize LTP-like plasticity dependence on age and gender. METHODS: A LTP-like primary motor cortex plasticity inducing a potentiation of the motor evoked potential (MEP) to focal transcranial magnetic stimulation as a consequence of a paired associative stimulation (PAS) was induced in a 50 healthy subject cohort, equally distributed for gender and age groups (25 young subjects, mean age+/-SD=29.8+/-4.5 years; elderly 61.1+/-4.1 years). RESULTS: Resting motor thresholds' excitability level increased in the elderly group, the basal MEP did not depend on gender or age. The PAS-induced primary motor cortex (M1) plastic excitability modulation was similar in young females and males, while it decreased with age in females only. CONCLUSIONS: A reduction of the PAS-induced M1 plasticity in females after menopause was documented, possibly due to an impairment of intracortical excitatory network activity. SIGNIFICANCE: A LTP-like plasticity dependence on age was found in female only, suggesting caution in interpreting behavioural studies on learning abilities in dependence on age.     

Evidence for associative plasticity in the human visual cortex

Background

Repetitive convergent inputs to a single post-synaptic neuron can induce long-term potentiation (LTP) or depression (LTD) of synaptic activity in a spike timing-dependent manner.

Short-term and long-term plasticity interaction in human primary motor cortex

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over primary motor cortex (M1) elicits changes in motor evoked potential (MEP) size thought to reflect short‐ and long‐term forms of synaptic plasticity, resembling short‐term potentiation (STP) and long‐term potentiation/depression (LTP/LTD) observed in animal experiments. We designed this study in healthy humans to investigate whether STP as elicited by 5‐Hz rTMS interferes with LTP/LTD‐like plasticity induced by intermittent and continuous theta‐burst stimulation (iTBS and cTBS). The effects induced by 5‐Hz rTMS and iTBS/cTBS were indexed as changes in MEP size. We separately evaluated changes induced by 5‐Hz rTMS, iTBS and cTBS applied alone and those induced by iTBS and cTBS delivered after priming 5‐Hz rTMS. Interactions between 5‐Hz rTMS and iTBS/cTBS were investigated under several experimental conditions by delivering 5‐Hz rTMS at suprathreshold and subthreshold intensity, allowing 1 and 5 min intervals to elapse between 5‐Hz rTMS and TBS, and delivering one and ten 5‐Hz rTMS trains. We also investigated whether 5‐Hz rTMS induces changes in intracortical excitability tested with paired‐pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. When given alone, 5‐Hz rTMS induced short‐lasting and iTBS/cTBS induced long‐lasting changes in MEP amplitudes. When M1 was primed with 10 suprathreshold 5‐Hz rTMS trains at 1 min before iTBS or cTBS, the iTBS/cTBS‐induced after‐effects disappeared. The 5‐Hz rTMS left intracortical excitability unchanged. We suggest that STP elicited by suprathreshold 5‐Hz rTMS abolishes iTBS/cTBS‐induced LTP/LTD‐like plasticity through non‐homeostatic metaplasticity mechanisms. Our study provides new information on interactions between short‐term and long‐term rTMS‐induced plasticity in human M1.     

Homeostatic plasticity in human motor cortex demonstrated by two consecutive sessions of paired associative stimulation

Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) underlie most models of learning and memory, but neural activity would grow or shrink in an uncontrolled manner, if not guarded by stabilizing mechanisms. The Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro (BCM) rule proposes a sliding threshold for LTP/LTD induction: LTP induction becomes more difficult if neural activity was high previously. Here we tested if this form of homeostatic plasticity applies to the human motor cortex (M1) in vivo by examining the interactions between two consecutive sessions of paired associative stimulation (PAS). PAS consisted of repeated pairs of electrical stimulation of the right median nerve followed by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left M1. The first PAS session employed an interstimulus interval equalling the individual N20-latency of the median nerve somatosensory-evoked cortical potential plus 2 ms, N20-latency minus 5 ms, or a random alternation between these intervals, to induce an LTP-like increase in motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes in the right abductor pollicis brevis muscle (PAS(LTP)), an LTD-like decrease (PAS(LTD)), or no change (PAS(Control)), respectively. The second PAS session 30 min later was always PAS(LTP). It induced an moderate LTP-like effect if conditioned by PAS(Control), which increased if conditioned by PAS(LTD), but decreased if conditioned by PAS(LTP). Effects on MEP amplitude induced by the second PAS session exhibited a negative linear correlation with those in the first PAS session. Because the two PAS sessions activate identical neuronal circuits, we conclude that 'homosynaptic-like' homeostatic mechanisms in accord with the BCM rule contribute to regulating plasticity in human M1.     

Modulation of excitability in human primary somatosensory and motor cortex by paired associative stimulation targeting the primary somatosensory cortex

Input from primary somatosensory cortex (S1) to primary motor cortex (M1) is important for high-level motor performance, motor skill learning and motor recovery after brain lesion. This study tested the effects of manipulating S1 excitability with paired associative transcranial stimulation (S1-PAS) on M1 excitability. Given the important role of S1 in sensorimotor integration, we hypothesized that changes in S1 excitability would be directly paralleled by changes in M1 excitability. We applied two established protocols (S1-PAS(LTP) and S1-PAS(LTD) ) to the left S1 to induce long-term potentiation (LTP)-like or long-term depression (LTD)-like plasticity. S1 excitability was assessed by the early cortical components (N20-P25) of the median nerve somatosensory-evoked potential. M1 excitability was assessed by motor-evoked potential amplitude and short-interval intracortical inhibition. Effects of S1-PAS(LTP) were compared with those of a PAS(LTP) protocol targeting the left M1 (M1-PAS(LTP) ). S1-PAS(LTP) and S1-PAS(LTD) did not result in significant modifications of S1 or M1 excitability at the group level due to substantial interindividual variability. The individual S1-PAS-induced changes in S1 and M1 excitability showed no correlation. Furthermore, the individual changes in S1 and M1 excitability induced by S1-PAS(LTP) did not correlate with changes in M1 excitability induced by M1-PAS(LTP) . This demonstrates that the effects of S1-PAS in S1 are variable across individuals and, within a given individual, unrelated to those induced by S1-PAS or M1-PAS in M1. Potentially, this extends the opportunities of therapeutic PAS applications because M1-PAS 'non-responders' may well respond to S1-PAS.     

Pharmacological modulation of plasticity in the human motor cortex

Ischemic cerebral stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability among adults in industrialized countries. One fundamental but still not sufficiently solved question is how to improve disability after stroke. Here, evidence will be reviewed on how pharmacological treatment modulates plasticity and learning in the intact human motor cortex. It will be argued that these data may be useful for advancing the concepts of pharmacotherapy for recovery after stroke.     

Effects of lamotrigine on human motor cortex plasticity

ObjectiveBesides its use in epilepsy, lamotrigine (LTG) is also effective as mood stabilizer. The pathophysiology of mood disorders may incorporate a dysfunction of neuronal plasticity and animal experiments suggest that mood stabilizers influence induction of long-term potentiation (LTP) and –depression (LTD), two major forms of synaptic plasticity. However, the exact modes of action of LTG and its impact on neuronal plasticity in humans remain unclear.MethodsHere, we tested the effects of a single oral dose of LTG (300 mg) on motor cortical plasticity induced by paired associative stimulation (PAS₂₅), a protocol that typically induces LTP-like plasticity, in 26 young healthy adults in a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind crossover design. We stratified analysis of the LTG effects according to the individual PAS₂₅ response in the placebo session (14 LTP-responders vs. 12 LTD-responders). Plasticity was indexed by motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitudes recorded before and for 60 min after PAS₂₅.ResultsLTG resulted in a significant reduction of the LTP-like MEP increase in the LTP-responders and a reduction of the LTD-like MEP decrease in the LTD-responders, with the majority of LTD-responders even showing an MEP increase.ConclusionsIn summary, LTG differentially modulated cortical plasticity induced by non-invasive brain stimulation in human subjects depending on their individual intrinsic propensity for expressing LTP-like or LTD-like plasticity.SignificanceFindings contribute to our understanding of the anticonvulsant and antidepressant clinical effects of LTG, which have been suggested to occur, at least in part, through downregulation of LTP (epilepsy) and LTD (depressive disorders).     

Lack of LTP-like plasticity in primary motor cortex in Parkinson's disease

In this study in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), off and on dopaminergic therapy, with and without L-dopa-induced dyskinesias (LIDs), we tested intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), a technique currently used for non-invasively inducing long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity in primary motor cortex (M1). The study group comprised 20 PD patients on and off dopaminergic therapy (11 patients without and 9 patients with LIDs), and 14 age-matched healthy subjects. Patients had mild-to-moderate PD, and no additional neuropsychiatric disorders. We clinically evaluated patients using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale (UDysRS). The left M1 was conditioned with iTBS at 80% active motor threshold intensity. Twenty motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from right first interosseous muscle before and at 5, 15 and 30 min after iTBS. Between-group analysis of variance (ANOVA) testing healthy subjects versus patients with and without LIDs, on and off therapy showed a significant interaction between factors “Group” and “Time”. After iTBS, MEP amplitudes in healthy subjects increased significantly at 5, 15 and 30 min (p < 0.01 at all time-points) but in PD patients with and without LIDs, on and off therapy, remained unchanged. In PD patients with and without LIDs, on and off therapy iTBS fails to increase MEP responses. This finding suggests lack of iTBS-induced LTP-like plasticity in M1 in PD regardless of patients' clinical features.     

LTD-like plasticity of the human primary motor cortex can be reversed by γ-tACS

BackgroundCortical oscillatory activities play a role in regulating several brain functions in humans. However, whether motor resonant oscillations (i.e. β and γ) modulate long-term depression (LTD)-like plasticity of the primary motor cortex (M1) is still unclear.ObjectiveTo address this issue, we combined transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), a technique able to entrain cortical oscillations, with continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), a transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) protocol commonly used to induce LTD-like plasticity in M1.MethodsMotor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by single-pulse TMS, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were evaluated before and 5, 15 and 30 min after cTBS alone or cTBS delivered during β-tACS (cTBS-β) or γ-tACS (cTBS-γ). Moreover, we tested the effects of β-tACS (alone) on short-latency afferent inhibition (SAI) and γ-tACS on SICI in order to verify whether tACS-related interneuronal modulation contributes to the effects of tACS-cTBS co-stimulation.ResultscTBS-γ turned the expected after-effects of cTBS from inhibition to facilitation. By contrast, responses to cTBS-β were similar to those induced by cTBS alone. β- and γ-tACS did not change MEPs evoked by single-pulse TMS. β-tACS reduced SAI and γ-tACS reduced SICI. However, the degree of γ-tACS-induced modulation of SICI did not correlate with the effects of cTBS-γ.Conclusionγ-tACS reverses cTBS-induced plasticity of the human M1. γ-oscillations may therefore regulate LTD-like plasticity mechanisms.     

Differences between the effects of three plasticity inducing protocols on the organization of the human motor cortex

Several experimental protocols induce lasting changes in the excitability of motor cortex. Some involve direct cortical stimulation, others activate the somatosensory system and some combine motor and sensory stimulation. The effects usually are measured as changes in amplitude of the motor-evoked-potential (MEP) or short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) elicited by a single or paired pulses of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Recent work has also tested sensorimotor organization within the motor cortex by recording MEPs and SICI during short periods of vibration applied to single intrinsic hand muscles. Here sensorimotor organization is focal: MEPs increase and SICI decreases in the vibrated muscle, whilst the opposite occurs in neighbouring muscles. In six volunteers we compared the after effects of three protocols that lead to lasting changes in cortical excitability: (i) paired associative stimulation (PAS) between a TMS pulse and an electrical stimulus to the median nerve; (ii) motor practice of rapid thumb abduction; and (iii) sensory input produced by semicontinuous muscle vibration, on MEPs and SICI at rest and on the sensorimotor organization. PAS increased MEP amplitudes, whereas vibration changed sensorimotor organization. Motor practice had a dual effect and increased MEPs as well as affecting sensorimotor organization. The implication is that different protocols target different sets of cortical circuits. We speculate that protocols that involve repeated activation of motor cortical output lead to lasting changes in efficacy of synaptic connections in output circuits, whereas protocols that emphasize sensory inputs affect the strength of sensory inputs to motor circuits.     

Associative plasticity in surround inhibition circuits in human motor cortex

Surround inhibition is a physiological mechanism that is hypothesised to improve contrast between signals in the central nervous system. In the human motor system, motor surround inhibition (mSI) can be assessed using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). We evaluated whether it is possible to modulate mSI, using a paradigm able to induce plastic effects in primary motor cortex (M1). Fifteen healthy volunteers participated in the experiments. To assess mSI, we delivered single pulses at rest and at the onset of a right thumb abduction. TMS pulses over abductor digiti minimi (ADM; surround muscle) hotspot were delivered when EMG activity in right abductor pollicis brevis (APB; active muscle) > 100 μV was detected. Paired associative stimulation (PAS) was delivered using peripheral median nerve electric stimulation and TMS over APB M1 area at an interstimulus interval of 21.5 ms for the real PAS (PAS21.5) and 100 ms for the sham PAS (PAS100). To verify the effect of PAS21.5 on mSI we collected 20 MEPs from ADM at rest and during APB movements before (T0) and 5 (T1), 15 (T2) and 30 (T3) minutes after PAS21.5. mSI from APB to ADM was present at baseline. PAS21.5 increased the amount of mSI compared with baseline whereas there was no effect after PAS100. Our results suggest that mSI is an adaptable phenomenon depending on prior experience.     

Increasing motor cortex plasticity with spaced paired associative stimulation at different intervals in older adults

The ability of priming non‐invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to modulate neuroplasticity induction (i.e. metaplasticity) within primary motor cortex (M1) may be altered in older adults. Previous studies in young subjects suggest that consecutive NIBS protocols interact in a time‐dependent manner and involve homoeostatic metaplasticity mechanisms. This was investigated in older adults by assessing the response to consecutive blocks of paired‐associative stimulation (PAS) separated by different inter‐PAS intervals (IPIs). Fifteen older (62–82 years) subjects participated in four sessions, with each session involving two PAS blocks separated by IPIs of 10 (IPI₁₀) or 30 (IPI₃₀) mins. For each IPI, the first (priming) PAS block was either PAS_LTP (N20 latency + 2 ms) or PAS_LTD (N20 latency ? 10 ms), while the second (test) PAS block was always PAS_LTP. Changes in M1 excitability were assessed by recording motor evoked potentials from a muscle of the right hand. For both IPIs, the response produced by PAS_LTD‐primed PAS_LTP was significantly greater than the response produced by PAS_LTP‐primed PAS_LTP. Furthermore, the effects of PAS_LTD priming on PAS_LTP were significantly greater for IPI₃₀. These findings suggest that priming PAS can increase plasticity induction in older adults, and this occurs through mechanisms involving homoeostatic metaplasticity. They also demonstrate that the timing between priming and test NIBS is a crucial determinant of this effect, with a 30‐min interval being most effective. Providing a 30‐min delay between priming NIBS and motor training may improve the efficacy of NIBS in augmenting motor performance and learning in the elderly.     

Biological factors and age-dependence of primary motor cortex experimental plasticity

To evaluate whether the age-dependence of brain plasticity correlates with the levels of proteins involved in hormone and brain functions we executed a paired associative stimulation (PAS) protocol and blood tests. We measured the PAS-induced plasticity in the primary motor cortex. Blood levels of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), estradiol, the insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, the insulin-like growth factor binding protein (IGFBP)-3, progesterone, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), testosterone, and the transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1) were determined in 15 healthy men and 20 healthy women. We observed an age-related reduction of PAS-induced plasticity in females that it is not present in males. In females, PAS-induced plasticity displayed a correlation with testosterone (p = 0.006) that became a trend after the adjustment for the age effect (p = 0.078). In males, IGF-1 showed a nominally significant correlation with the PAS-induced plasticity (p = 0.043). In conclusion, we observed that hormone blood levels (testosterone in females and IGF-1 in males) may be involved in the age-dependence of brain plasticity.     

Associative plasticity in intracortical inhibitory circuits in human motor cortex

ObjectivePaired associative stimulation (PAS) is a transcranial magnetic stimulation technique inducing Hebbian-like synaptic plasticity in the human motor cortex (M1). PAS is produced by repetitive pairing of a peripheral nerve shock and a transcranial magnetic stimulus (TMS). Its effect is assessed by a change in size of a motor evoked response (MEP). MEP size results from excitatory and inhibitory influences exerted on cortical pyramidal cells, but no robust effects on inhibitory networks have been demonstrated so far.MethodIn 38 healthy volunteers, we assessed whether a PAS intervention influences three intracortical inhibitory circuits: short (SICI) and long (LICI) intracortical inhibitions reflecting activity of GABA_A and GABA_B interneurons, respectively, and long afferent inhibition (LAI) reflecting activity of somatosensory inputs.ResultsAfter PAS, MEP sizes, LICI and LAI levels were significantly changed while changes of SICI were inconsistent. The changes in LICI and LAI lasted 45 min after PAS. Their direction depended on the delay between the arrival time of the afferent volley at the cortex and the TMS-induced cortical activation during the PAS.ConclusionsPAS influences inhibitory circuits in M1.SignificancePAS paradigms can demonstrate Hebbian-like plasticity at selected inhibitory networks as well as excitatory networks.     

Visual attentional load influences plasticity in the human motor cortex

Neural plasticity plays a critical role in learning, memory, and recovery from injury to the nervous system. Although much is known about the physical and physiological determinants of plasticity, little is known about the influence of cognitive factors. In this study, we investigated whether selective attention plays a role in modifying changes in neural excitability reflecting long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity. We induced LTP-like effects in the hand area of the human motor cortex using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). During the induction of plasticity, participants engaged in a visual detection task with either low or high attentional demands. Changes in neural excitability were assessed by measuring motor-evoked potentials in a small hand muscle before and after the TMS procedures. In separate experiments plasticity was induced either by paired associative stimulation (PAS) or intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS). Because these procedures induce different forms of LTP-like effects, they allowed us to investigate the generality of any attentional influence on plasticity. In both experiments reliable changes in motor cortex excitability were evident under low-load conditions, but this effect was eliminated under high-attentional load. In a third experiment we investigated whether the attentional task was associated with ongoing changes in the excitability of motor cortex, but found no difference in evoked potentials across the levels of attentional load. Our findings indicate that in addition to their role in modifying sensory processing, mechanisms of attention can also be a potent modulator of cortical plasticity.