Diagnosis,treatment and long-term outcomes of autoimmune pancreatitis in Spain based on the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria: A multi-centre study

ObjectivesAutoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a form of chronic pancreatitis that has been reported worldwide for the last two decades. The aim of this study is to analyse the clinical profile of patients from Spain with AIP, as well as treatments, relapses and long-term outcomes.MethodsData from 59 patients with suspected AIP that had been diagnosed in 15 institutions are retrospectively analysed. Subjects are classified according to the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria (ICDC). Patients with type 1 AIP (AIP1) and type 2 AIP (AIP2) are compared. Kaplan–Meier methodology is used to estimate the overall survival without relapses.ResultsFifty-two patients met ICDC, 45 patients were AIP1 (86.5%). Common manifestations included abdominal pain (65.4%) and obstructive jaundice (51.9%). Diffuse enlargement of pancreas was present in 51.0%; other organ involvement was present in 61.5%. Serum IgG4 increased in 76.7% of AIP1 patients vs. 20.0% in AIP2 (p = 0.028). Tissue specimens were obtained in 76.9%. Initial successful treatment with steroids or surgery was achieved in 79.8% and 17.3%, respectively. Maintenance treatment was given in 59.6%. Relapses were present in 40.4% of AIP1, with a median of 483 days. Successful long-term remission was achieved in 86.4%.ConclusionsAIP1 is the most frequent form of AIP in Spain in our dataset. Regularly, ICDC allows AIP diagnosis without the need for surgery. Steroid and chirurgic treatments were effective and safe in most patients with AIP, although maintenance was required many times because of their tendency to relapse. Long-term serious consequences were uncommon.     

Diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis in Japan

Autoimmune pancreatitis （AIP） is a particular type of pancreatitis of presumed autoimmune etiology. Currently, AIP should be diagnosed based on combination of clinical, serological, morphological, and histopathological features. When diagnosing AIP, it is most important to differentiate it from pancreatic cancer. Diagnostic criteria for AIP, proposed by the Japan Pancreas Society in 2002 first in the world, were revised in 2006. The criteria are based on the minimum consensus of AIP and aim to avoid misdiagnosing pancreatic cancer as far as possible, but not for screening AIR The criteria consist of the following radiological, serological, and histopathological items： （1） radiological imaging showing narrowing of the main pancreatic duct and enlargement of the pancreas, which are characteristic of the disease; （2） laboratory data showing abnormally elevated levels of serum y-globulin, IgG or IgG4, or the presence of autoantibodies; （3） histopathological examination of the pancreas demonstrating marked fibrosis and prominent infiltration of lymphocytes and plasma cells, which is called lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis （LPSP）. For a diagnosis of AIP, criterion 1 must be present, together with criterion 2 and/ or criterion 3. However, it is necessary to exclude malignant diseases such as pancreatic or biliary cancer.     

Malignancy in chronic pancreatitis: Analysis of diagnostic procedures and proposal of a clinical algorithm

BackgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by its poor prognosis, and some benign conditions and syndromes, including chronic pancreatitis (CP), are risk factors for pancreatic carcinoma. However, the differential diagnosis of CP from PDAC is difficult for clinicians because PDAC frequently causes inflammation within the pancreas. Therefore, patients with CP exhibit not only an elevated risk of cancer, but they are also in danger of underdiagnosis.MethodsThe present study retrospectively analyzed 29 patients with pancreatic cancer who fulfilled our definition of “chronic pancreatitis” to identify characteristics to aid in the differential diagnosis between chronic pancreatitis with and without pancreatic cancer. All parameters were subjected to univariate analysis.ResultsWe identified several factors that differed significantly between the CP patients and patients with CP and synchronous PDAC, and these characteristics were used to develop a diagnostic algorithm. The performance of the algorithm was externally validated in a different panel of patients from the Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim.ConclusionThe present study succeeded in identifying characteristics that significantly differed in patients with and without PDAC in CP. These characteristics were integrated in a diagnostic algorithm that might help to improve diagnostic of PDAC in CP.     

Diagnostic utility of biopsy specimens for autoimmune pancreatitis

Background and aims  Infiltration of IgG4-positive plasma cells in the pancreas and other organs is characteristic of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP). However, it is undetermined whether needle or forceps biopsy of pancreas or other organs is indeed useful for the diagnosis of AIP. We aimed to clarify this point. Methods  Among 39 AIP patients, tissue sampling without laparotomy was performed in 27. Biopsy of pancreas, gastric mucosa, liver, bile duct, and duodenal papilla was performed in 15, 17, 11, 5 and 7, respectively. The obtained specimens were examined for IgG4-positive plasma cells. We also examined gastric mucosa of 18 patients with pancreatic cancer as controls. When the number of IgG4-positive plasma cells was more than 10 per high-power field, we regarded it as diagnostic. Results  Diagnostic sensitivity in pancreas, gastric mucosa, liver, bile duct, and duodenal papilla was 47% (7/15), 47% (8/17), 36% (4/11), 0% (0/5), and 57% (4/7), respectively. Conclusions  Sensitivity of IgG4 immunostaining was unsatisfactory when tissue sampling was performed by needle or forceps biopsy. Biopsy of gastric mucosa might be a good subsidiary diagnostic tool.     

The Italian Consensus Conference on Diagnostic Criteria for Myelofibrosis with Myeloid Metaplasia

The purpose of this work was to develop a definition of myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) using diagnostic criteria that would remain valid within the set of patients with chronic myeloproliferative disorders or myelodysplastic syndromes. A list of 12 names for the disease and 37 diagnostic criteria were proposed to a Consensus Panel of 12 Italian experts who ranked them in order so as to identify a core set of criteria. The Panel was then asked to score the diagnosis of 46 patient profiles as appropriate or not appropriate for MMM. Using the experts' consensus as the gold standard, the performance of 90 possible definitions of the disease obtained through the core set was evaluated. 'Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia' ranked as the preferred name of the disease. Necessary criteria consisted of 'diffuse bone marrow fibrosis' and 'absence of Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL rearrangement in peripheral blood cells'. The six optional criteria in the core set consisted of: splenomegaly of any grade; anisopoikilocytosis with tear-drop erythrocytes; the presence of circulating immature myeloid cells; the presence of circulating erythroblasts: the presence of clusters of megakaryoblasts and anomalous megakaryocytes in bone marrow sections; myeloid metaplasia. The definition of the disease with the highest final score was as follows: necessary criteria plus any other two criteria when splenomegaly is present or any four when splenomegaly is absent. The use of this definition will help to standardize the conduct and reporting of clinical studies and should help practitioners in clinical practice.     

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography findings in early chronic pancreatitis diagnosed according to the Japanese Diagnostic Criteria

ObjectivesIt is important for diagnosing early chronic pancreatitis (CP), which may be improved by therapeutic intervention. We aimed to examine the pancreatic ductal changes on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in patients with early CP defined by the Japanese Diagnostic Criteria.MethodsThis retrospective study included patients suspected early CP and performed both endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and MRCP from January 2010 to August 2018. We assessed the diameter of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) and the number of irregularly dilated duct branches using MRCP imaging in early CP.ResultsWe enrolled 165 patients and 25 patients (15%) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for early CP. Irregular dilatation of ≥ 3 duct branches on MRCP was more often observed in early CP compared to non-early CP (P = 0.004), although MPD diameter was comparable (2.06 mm in early CP vs. 1.96 in non-early CP, P = 0.698). The sensitivity and specificity were 45% and 74%, respectively. The prevalence of positive MRCP findings in patients with ≥ 2 positive EUS findings was higher than that in patients with 1 positive EUS finding (P = 0.08) and in patients without an EUS finding (P < 0.001). There was no difference in the average diameter of MPD.ConclusionPatients with early CP often exhibit alteration in duct branches and not in MPD in addition to parenchymal alteration. Both pancreatic parenchyma and duct branches might need to be evaluated by EUS and MRCP.     

Amendment of the Japanese Consensus Guidelines for Autoimmune Pancreatitis, 2013 III. Treatment and prognosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

The standard treatment for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is steroid therapy, although some patients improve spontaneously. Indications for steroid therapy in AIP patients are symptoms such as obstructive jaundice, abdominal pain, back pain, and the presence of symptomatic extrapancreatic lesions. Prior to steroid therapy, obstructive jaundice should be managed by biliary drainage, and blood glucose levels should be controlled in patients with diabetes mellitus. The recommended initial oral prednisolone dose for induction of remission is 0.6 mg/kg/day, which is administered for 2–4 weeks. The dose is then tapered by 5 mg every 1–2 weeks, based on changes in clinical manifestations, biochemical blood tests (such as liver enzymes and IgG or IgG4 levels), and repeated imaging findings (US, CT, MRCP, ERCP, etc.). The dose is tapered to a maintenance dose (2.5–5 mg/day) over a period of 2–3 months. Cessation of steroid therapy should be based on the disease activity in each case. Termination of maintenance therapy should be planned within 3 years in cases with radiological and serological improvement. Re-administration or dose-up of steroid is effective for treating AIP relapse. Application of immunomodulatory drugs is considered for AIP patients who prove resistant to steroid therapy. The prognosis of AIP appears to be good over the short-term with steroid therapy. The long-term outcome is less clear, as there are many unknown factors, such as relapse, pancreatic exocrine or endocrine dysfunction, and associated malignancy.     

Amendment of the Japanese Consensus Guidelines for Autoimmune Pancreatitis, 2013 I. Concept and diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

Background

In response to the proposal of the international consensus diagnostic criteria (ICDC) for autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) and the Japanese diagnostic criteria in 2011, the 2009 Japanese consensus guidelines for managing AIP required revision.

Methods

Three committees [the professional committee for making clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists, the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee by moderators] were organized. Fifteen specialists for AIP extracted the specific clinical statements from 1,843 articles published between 1963 and 2012 (obtained from Pub Med and a secondary database, and developed the CQs and statements. The expert panel individually rated the clinical statements using a modified Delphi approach, in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than seven on a nine-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid.

Results

The professional committee created 13 CQs and statements for the current concept and diagnosis of AIP, 6 for extra-pancreatic lesions, 6 for differential diagnosis, and 11 for treatment.

Conclusion

After evaluation by the moderators, amendments to the Japanese consensus guidelines for AIP have been proposed for 2013.     

Japanese consensus guidelines for management of autoimmune pancreatitis: I. Concept and diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis

As the number of patients with autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is increasing in Japan, practical guidelines for managing AIP need to be established. Three committees [the professional committee for developing clinical questions (CQs) and statements by Japanese specialists, the expert panelist committee for rating statements by the modified Delphi method, and the evaluating committee of moderators] were organized. Fifteen AIP specialists extracted specific clinical statements from a total of 871 articles in the literature using a PubMed search (1963–2008) and a secondary database, and developed the CQs and statements. The expert panelists individually rated these clinical statements using a modified Delphi approach in which a clinical statement receiving a median score greater than 7 on a 9-point scale from the panel was regarded as valid. The professional committee developed 13, 6, 6, and 11 CQs and statements for the concept and diagnosis, extra-pancreatic lesions, differential diagnosis and treatment, respectively. The expert panelists regarded them as valid after two-round modified Delphi approaches. After evaluation by the moderators, the Japanese clinical guidelines for AIP were established. The digest versions of the present guidelines have been published in the official journal of the Japan Pancreas Society, “Pancreas.” Full versions divided into three series are scheduled to be published in the present and followings two issues in the Journal of Gastroenterology with approval of Professor Go VLW, the Editor-in-Chief of "Pancreas.”     

A proposal for a new clinical classification of chronic pancreatitis

Background  

The clinical course of chronic pancreatitis is still unpredictable, which relates to the lack of the availability of a clinical classification. Therefore, patient populations cannot be compared, the course and the outcome of the disease remain undetermined in the individual patient, and treatment is not standardized.     

Development and validation of a new simplified diagnostic scoring system for pediatric autoimmune hepatitis

BackgroundChildren with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) often exhibit particular features. Accordingly, seven pediatric-specific criteria have been proposed.AimTo develop a prediction model based on them, transform it into a scoring system and study its accuracy.MethodsA cohort of children under study for liver disease was consecutively selected. AIH diagnosis was based on classical criteria. Already proposed pediatric criteria were recorded. The best possible regression model was selected, and the beta coefficient of each criterion was translated into a whole number (points). Total scores were obtained following the points system and the best cut-off was calculated. Subsequently, accuracy of the diagnostic score was studied in the validation set.ResultsAmong 212 included patients, 100 had AIH. The score included 5 criteria: autoantibodies (0–2 points), hypergammaglobulinemia, exclusion of viral hepatitis, exclusion of Wilson’s disease (1 point each) and liver histology (3 points). In addition, a normal cholangiogram is mandatory. The validation set was formed of 70 patients (24 with AIH). In this subsample, a score of ≥6 renders a sensitivity/specificity of 95.8%/100%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 97.1%.ConclusionPediatric-specific criteria for the diagnosis of AIH can be reliably used as a scoring system.     

Review of diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis; for establishment of international criteria

Along with worldwide expansion of the disease concept of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), the necessity of international diagnostic criteria for the disease is increasing. Since the first diagnostic criteria for AIP by the Japan Pancreas Society was proposed in 2002, certain groups in several countries have reported criteria for AIP. We reviewed the criteria proposed to date. Among three systematic criteria from Japan, the Mayo Clinic and Korea, there is no fundamental difference in the three major diagnostic categories: findings on pancreatic imaging, laboratory and histological studies. Notable differences are that typical imaging findings are essential for the diagnosis in Japanese and Korean criteria, but not in the Mayo criteria, while, the Mayo criteria emphasize the histological findings as a gold standard for the diagnosis. The critical differences between the Japanese and the other two criteria are the use of the diagnostic factors “other organ involvement” and “steroid responsiveness.” Employment of these factors in clinical diagnostic criteria for general physicians possibly confuses the disease concept and definitely increases the risk for treating patients with pancreatic or biliary malignancies with steroids. Even if the sensitivity of criteria goes down, their use might be limited to certain kinds of specific criteria, such as that for epidemiological study, patient selection for research purposes, or use in expert hospitals. The disease entity of AIP postulated in Europe includes two histological types of pancreatitis with different clinical phenotypes, suggesting two syndromic spectra of autoimmune-related chronic pancreatitis.