Central corneal thickness in congenital glaucoma

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare central corneal thickness between eyes with congenital glaucoma and normal fellow eyes in unilateral glaucoma or less affected fellow eyes in bilateral glaucoma. METHODS: Eyes of consecutive phakic children with congenital glaucoma and previous glaucoma surgery were examined under chloral hydrate. Complete ophthalmologic examination, central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length, and corneal diameter measurements were performed. Patients were included in the study if presented with intraocular pressure (IOP) less than 21 mm Hg and no biomicroscopic signs of corneal edema. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in the study. The mean CCT in the more affected eye/glaucomatous eye was 522.3 +/- 65.2 microm and in the less affected eye/healthy eye was 579.7 +/- 44.5 microm. This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.0013). CONCLUSION: CCT was significantly thinner in glaucomatous eyes than in normal fellow eyes in phakic children with congenital glaucoma. This finding may be another confounding factor when measuring IOP in these patients.     

Glaucoma in Children: Are We Making Progress?

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma in children presents difficult clinical challenges. Even when appropriately treated, blindness can occur. DESIGN: Retrospective interventional case series and literature review. METHODS: All clinical records of children seen by the author with a diagnosis of glaucoma established before 16 years of age were reviewed from 1977 to 2003. Glaucoma was classified as primary infantile, aphakic, syndrome-related, and secondary. The best-corrected visual acuity, refractive error, configuration of the optic nerve cup, and perimetry were recorded. The intraocular pressure (IOP) for each visit was recorded. IOP measurements of 19 mm Hg or less were considered "good." The percentage of "good" readings was calculated for each eye. Representative visual acuities, refractive errors, IOP, disk configuration, and perimetry were recorded at 6, 12, 18, and 24 years of age for each patient. The admitting ophthalmologic diagnosis for each child at the Western Pennsylvania School for Blind Children was recorded from 1887 to 2003. Results: One hundred twenty-six children (204 eyes) were studied: infantile glaucoma, 52 eyes; aphakic glaucoma, 40 eyes; syndrome associated, 69 eyes; and secondary glaucoma, 43 eyes. The mean follow-up was 11.6 years (1 to 30 years). Overall, 60 (29.4%) of 204 eyes had a 6/12 (20/40) or better corrected visual acuity at the most recent visit. The percentage with this acuity remained stable throughout the follow-up period. Eyes with infantile glaucoma had the best acuity, and 40% had 6/12 (20/40) or better. Amblyopia was common and responded to treatment. Eyes with aphakic glaucoma had the worst acuity with only 10% achieving 6/12 or better. These eyes had a bimodal onset of glaucoma; eyes with an early onset had an angle closure configuration and eyes with a delayed onset had an open angle. Early cataract removal and microcornea were risk factors for glaucoma. If the IOP was maintained at 19 mm Hg or less (good) on 80% of the determinations over time, the optic nerve cup compared with the diameter of the optic nerve (C/D ratios) were stable. Eight patients had multiple, good quality, visual fields performed over 3 to 15 years. If the patients had "good" IOP on 70% of the measurements, the visual fields remained stable. A historical perspective of glaucoma control was gained by looking at the admitting diagnosis at the Western Pennsylvania School for Blind Children. From 1910 to 1970, an average of 9.2 children blind due to glaucoma were admitted each decade. From 1971 to 2003, there were only three children with glaucoma admitted over 30 years. CONCLUSION: Removal of congenital cataracts should be delayed until 3 to 4 weeks of age. Consideration should be given for using 19 mm Hg or less to measure the success of glaucoma treatment in children. Treatment of amblyopia is as important as IOP control in children. Imaging technology such as optical coherence tomography and measurement of central corneal thickness may play an important future role in the assessment of children with suspected or known glaucoma.     

Central corneal thickness in low-tension glaucoma

BACKGROUND: It is possible that the intraocular pressure (IOP) is underestimated in eyes whose central cornea is thinner than normal. The objective of this study was to determine and establish the significance of central corneal thickness in patients with low-tension (normal-tension) glaucoma compared with those with chronic open-angle glaucoma (COAG) or ocular hypertension and healthy eyes. METHODS: The study was carried out from February 1998 to May 1999. Central corneal thickness was measured by ultrasonic pachymetry and IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry in 25 patients with low-tension glaucoma (untreated IOP less than 21 mm Hg with evidence of optic nerve head damage and corresponding visual field loss on automated perimetry), 80 patients with COAG (untreated IOP 21 mm Hg or greater with evidence of optic nerve head damage and corresponding visual field loss on automated perimetry), 16 patients with ocular hypertension (untreated IOP 21 mm Hg or greater, with normal optic nerve head and no history of glaucoma or elevated IOP, and normal visual field on automated perimetry) and 50 control subjects (untreated IOP less than 21 mm Hg with normal optic nerve head and no history of glaucoma or elevated IOP). Analysis with Pearson's product-moment correlation was performed to determine the correlation of IOP and central corneal thickness, and one-way analysis of variance was used to compare corneal thickness between groups. RESULTS: The central cornea was significantly thinner in the low-tension glaucoma group (mean 513.2 mu [standard deviation (SD) 26.1 mu]) than in the COAG group (mean 548.2 mu [SD 35.0 mu]) and the control group (mean 556.7 mu [SD 35.9 mu]) (p < 0.001). No significant difference in corneal thickness was found between the COAG and control groups. The ocular hypertension group had significantly thicker corneas (mean 597.5 mu [SD 23.6 mu]) than the three other groups (p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Patients with low-tension glaucoma may have thinner corneas than patients with COAG and healthy subjects. This results in underestimation of their IOP. Corneal thickness should be taken into account when managing these patients to avoid undertreatment.     

Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma

PURPOSE: To investigate and compare the relationships between glaucomatous visual field loss and intraocular pressure (IOP) as measured by both Pascal dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All primary open-angle glaucoma and normal tension glaucoma patients seen between July 2005 and June 2006 with at least 2 sets of good-quality, bilateral DCT and GAT measurements were retrospectively identified. Additional inclusion criteria required that all subjects had repeatable, asymmetric glaucomatous visual field loss that corresponded with asymmetric glaucomatous optic neuropathy. After mean IOP values were computed and visual fields were scored using Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) criteria, paired-eye comparisons were conducted using right versus left eyes and higher versus lower AGIS-score eyes. RESULTS: Sixty-seven (42 primary open-angle glaucoma, 25 normal tension glaucoma) subjects met all criteria for study inclusion. Per paired t test, mean DCT-IOP was significantly higher in the higher AGIS-score eyes compared with the lower AGIS-score eyes (16.3 vs. 15.5 mm Hg, P=0.004), whereas GAT-IOP was not significantly different in these same eyes (14.5 vs. 14.4 mm Hg, P=0.56). Mean IOP difference between the 2 methods was significantly larger in higher versus lower AGIS-score eyes (P<0.001), and 72% of the subjects demonstrated larger intermethod IOP differences in their higher AGIS-score eye compared with their lower AGIS-score eye (P<0.001; 95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.82). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that AGIS-score differences between eyes were independently associated with both intermethod IOP differences between eyes (P=0.004) and central corneal thickness (CCT) differences between eyes (P=0.04). CCT, however, was not associated with intermethod IOP differences within or between eyes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that DCT-IOP is correlated with glaucomatous damage, and moreover, DCT-IOP is more closely related to extent of glaucoma damage than is GAT-IOP. The most likely explanation for these results is that GAT-IOP systematically underestimates IOP compared with DCT-IOP. Our findings also support the hypothesis that corneal biomechanical factors other than CCT are major confounders of applanation tonometry measurements.     

Influence of corneal structure, corneal responsiveness, and other ocular parameters on tonometric measurement of intraocular pressure

PURPOSE: To estimate the relationships between ocular parameters and tonometrically measured intraocular pressure (IOP), to determine the influence of ocular parameters on different instrument measurements of IOP, and to evaluate the association of ocular parameters with a parameter called hysteresis. METHODS: Patients presenting at a glaucoma clinic were recruited for this study. Subjects underwent IOP measurement with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), the TonoPen, and the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA), and also measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT), axial length, corneal curvature, corneal astigmatism, central visual acuity, and refractive error. Chart information was reviewed to determine glaucoma treatment history. The ORA instrument provided a measurement called corneal hysteresis. The association between measured IOP and the other ocular characteristics was estimated using generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Among 230 patients, IOP measurements from the TonoPen read lowest, and ORA read highest, and GAT measurements were closest to the mean IOP of the 3 instruments. In a multiple regression model adjusting for age, sex, race, and other ocular characteristics, a 10 microm increase in CCT was associated with an increase of 0.79 mm Hg measured IOP in untreated eyes (P<0.0001). Of the 3 tonometers, GAT was the least affected by CCT (0.66 mm Hg/10 mum, P<0.0001). Hysteresis was significantly correlated with CCT with a modest correlation coefficient (r=0.20, P<0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Among parameters related to measured IOP, features in addition to CCT, such as hysteresis and corneal curvature, may also be important. Tonometric instruments seem to be affected differently by various physiologic characteristics.     

Cataract surgery for congenital cataract: endothelial cell characteristics, corneal thickness, and impact on intraocular pressure.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether central corneal thickness (CCT), endothelial cell characteristics, and intraocular pressure (IOP) are affected in patients with previous congenital cataract surgery and to focus on their clinical significance. METHODS: CCT and IOP measurements and specular microscopy were performed in 31 eyes of 17 cases of extracted congenital cataracts and 40 eyes of 20 age- and sex-matched participants as control group. The mean of three pachymetry measurements of the central cornea was taken as CCT. IOP was checked using an applanation tonometer. RESULTS: The mean corneal thickness of the eyes with extracted congenital cataract (632+/-45 microm) was significantly greater than that of the control eyes (546+/-33 microm; p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the corneal endothelial cell count, coefficient of variation (CV), and mean cell area (AVG) of endothelial cells between operated eyes and the control group. The mean measured IOP in the operated group (22.8+/-3.3 mm Hg) was significantly greater than IOP in controls (14.1+/-1.8 mm Hg, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the corneas were clinically clear and there was no significant difference in endothelial characteristics of eyes with extracted congenital cataract and controls, central corneas of operated eyes were significantly thicker than those of controls. To differentiate the actual glaucoma from ocular hypertension in these patients, the central corneal thickness measurement should strongly be considered.     

Ocular response analyzer versus Goldmann applanation tonometry for intraocular pressure measurements

PURPOSE: To establish correlations between intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the ocular response analyzer (ORA) and the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). The effects of central corneal thickness on the measures obtained were also examined. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. IOP was determined in 48 eyes of 48 patients with glaucoma In all patients, central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by ultrasound pachymetry. RESULTS: ORA readings were consistently higher than GAT measurements (Goldmann-correlated IOP - IOP GAT mean difference, 7.2 +/- 3.5 mm Hg; corneal-compensated IOP - IOP GAT mean difference, 8.3 +/- 4.0 mm Hg) However, differences were not constant and increased with increasing IOP GAT readings, both with respect to Goldmann-correlated IOP (slope = 0.623, P < 0.0001) and corneal-compensated IOP (slope = 0.538, P < 0.0001). Both pressure measurements provided by the ORA showed significant correlation with CCT (CCT versus Goldmann-correlated IOP: r = 0.460, P = 0.001; CCT versus corneal-compensated IOP: r = 0.442, P = 0.001). No significant effects of corneal curvature or refraction on any of the pressures were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The ORA significantly overestimates IOP compared with the GAT. Differences between both sets of measures increase as the GAT-determined IOP increases. ORA readings seem to be affected by central corneal thickness.     

Central corneal thickness and corneal diameter in patients with childhood glaucoma

PURPOSE: To determine and compare the central corneal thickness (CCT) and corneal diameter among groups of patients with childhood glaucomas and assess the relationship between CCT and corneal diameter in these patients. DESIGN: A multicenter observational case series using prospective and retrospective data. METHODS: Patients from the Scheie Eye Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, and Emory and Vanderbilt Medical Centers with childhood glaucomas were eligible to participate. Retrospective data on CCT and corneal diameter of these patients were collected when available; otherwise, patients were asked to return to the ophthalmology clinics for measurements. Patients with corneal edema or central corneal scarring were excluded. One hundred eighty four glaucomatous eyes from 109 patients (median age = 9.0 y; age range = 0 to 60 y) were included. RESULTS: The mean CCT (+/-SE) was 651.1+/-63.5 microm for aphakic, 528.7+/-38.5 microm for Axenfeld-Rieger, and 563.4+/-67.9 microm for 1 degrees infantile eyes. The mean corneal diameter in aphakic, Axenfeld-Rieger, and 1 degrees infantile glaucoma eyes were 11.2+/-1.0, 12.5+/-0.9, and 13.2+/-1.2 mm, respectively. There was a significant difference in CCT and in corneal diameter between aphakic and 1 degrees infantile glaucoma eyes, and between aphakic and Axenfeld-Rieger eyes (P < 0.0001). There was a negative correlation between CCT and corneal diameter in all eyes (r = -0.41, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with aphakic glaucoma are different from those with congenital glaucoma or Axenfeld-Rieger in CCT and corneal diameter. A patient with pediatric glaucoma and a larger corneal diameter was more likely to have a thinner CCT. Attention should be paid to the CCT of patients with childhood glaucomas for interpretation of intraocular pressure.     

Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy: a comparison of three different tonometers

PURPOSE: To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) with three different instruments, Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), noncontact tonometer, and Tono-Pen after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia. METHODS: A prospective case series study to evaluate preoperative and postoperative IOP measurements of 149 eyes at 12 months. We performed GAT, noncontact tonometry, Tono-Pen central, and Tono-Pen temporal periphery measurements. We also performed measurements of the central corneal thickness (CCT) by ultrasonic pachymetry and keratometry. Pre-operative IOP reading served as control for all studies. RESULTS: After PRK, IOP reading was significantly reduced in the treated eyes when compared with the control measurements (11.87+/-1.73 vs. 13.37+/-1.52 mm Hg, p<0.0001 with GAT; 12.07+/-1.6 vs. 13.51+/-1.59 mm Hg, p<0.0001 with noncontact tonometer; 12.18+/-1.6 vs. 13.48+/-1.55 mm Hg, p<0.0001 with Tono-Pen central; 13.48+/-1.65 vs. 13.71+/-1.56 Hg, p<0.0104 with Tono-Pen temporal periphery). There was also a significant correlation between IOP reading changes measured by GAT, noncontact tonometer, Tono-Pen central, and change of CCT and between reduction of IOP reading and keratometry (r2>0.39, p<0.0001 for each). The correlation between IOP reading change by Tono-Pen temporal periphery and CCT was also significant but r2 value was only 0.034. Tono-Pen temporal periphery postoperative IOP measurements had the best correlation with preoperative GAT IOP (r2 = 0.57, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: PRK reduced IOP reading as measured by GAT, noncontact tonometer, and Tono-Pen central; less so when measured by Tono-Pen temporal periphery. Early detection of glaucoma and IOP follow-up in glaucoma patients may be done best by peripheral Tono-Pen measurements over the nonablated cornea.     

Central corneal thickness in children: Racial differences (black vs. white) and correlation with measured intraocular pressure

PURPOSE: To test the hypotheses that the mean central corneal thickness (CCT) of healthy black children is thinner than that of healthy white children and to confirm the relationship between increased CCT and measured intraocular pressure (IOP) in children. METHODS: This prospective observational case series included 178 eyes of 92 children aged 9 months to 17 years without anterior segment abnormalities or a clinical diagnosis of glaucoma. CCT was measured by ultrasonic pachymetry and IOP was measured by Goldmann or Tono-pen technique. RESULTS: The mean CCT for the 102 eyes of 52 white children was 562+/-35 microm versus 543+/-37 microm for the 66 eyes of 35 black children (P = 0.02). There was a positive relationship between CCT and IOP (P = 0.0002). For every 100 mum increase in CCT, the IOP increased by 2.2+/-0.6 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: The mean CCT of black children is thinner than that of white children. There is a positive relationship between increasing measured IOP and CCT among children with normal corneas and anterior segments. The interpretation of elevated IOP in eyes with abnormal anterior segment anatomy and thickened corneas awaits further study.     

Corneal thickness in congenital glaucoma

PURPOSE: To compare central corneal thickness between eyes with congenital glaucoma and normal controls and to correlate this parameter with corneal diameter and axial length. METHODS: Eyes of consecutive children with congenital glaucoma with previous glaucoma surgery and eyes of children with inadequacy of lacrimal drainage system with age less than 3 years old were examined under inhalatory general anesthesia. Complete ophthalmologic examination, central corneal thickness, axial length, and corneal diameter measurements were performed. All patients presented with intraocular pressure (IOP) less than 21 mm Hg and no clinical sign of corneal edema. RESULTS: Fifty-five eyes of 55 patients (30 congenital glaucoma and 25 controls) were examined (mean age = 16.6 +/- 10.6 months; 20 female/ 35 males). There was no significant difference in age and gender between glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Mean IOP was higher in glaucomatous eyes (P = 0.02). Corneal diameter and axial length between glaucomatous eyes and controls were significantly different (P < 0.0001 for both). Central corneal thickness was significantly thinner in glaucomatous eyes (P = 0.01). There was a significant correlation between corneal diameter and central corneal thickness and also between central corneal thickness and axial length (r2 = 0.32 and r2 = 0.18, respectively; P < 0.0001 for both). CONCLUSION: Central corneal thickness was significantly thinner in children with congenital glaucoma. This finding may be another confounding factor when measuring IOP in those patients. Pachymetry should be considered during their examination.     

Central corneal thickness: congenital cataracts and aphakia

PURPOSE: To evaluate central corneal thickness (CCT) in normal children (controls) and in those with cataracts, pseudophakia, and aphakia. DESIGN: Prospective, observational case series. METHODS: CCT was measured in 369 eyes of 223 children. Subjects with glaucoma, anterior segment abnormalities, or intraocular pressure of more than 30 mm Hg were excluded. Group means were compared for controls and for eyes with pediatric cataracts, pseudophakia, and aphakia. RESULTS: The mean CCT of eyes with cataracts was more than that of controls (574 +/- 54 microm [n = 46] and 552 +/- 38 microm [n = 230], respectively; P = .001). After excluding from the cataract group those eyes with aniridia, Down syndrome, Marfan syndrome, or glaucoma surgery, the mean CCT (564 +/- 34 microm [n = 36]) was no longer greater than that of controls (P = .07). The mean CCT of pseudophakic eyes (598 +/- 56 microm [n = 29]) was greater than the mean CCT of controls (P < .001) and was similar to the mean CCT of eyes with cataracts (P = .06). The mean CCT of aphakic eyes (642 +/- 88 microm [n = 64]) was greater than the mean CCT of controls (P < .001), eyes with cataracts (P < .001), and eyes with pseudophakia (P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of factors known to affect CCT (Down syndrome, Marfan syndrome, and aniridia), CCT is similar in eyes with pediatric cataracts and normal controls and increases after cataract surgery.     

Endoscopic diode laser cyclophotocoagulation in the management of aphakic and pseudophakic glaucoma in children.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ECP) has been shown to be a useful adjunct in the management of a variety of difficult pediatric and adult glaucomas. This study reports the efficacy and safety of this procedure for pediatric aphakic and pseudophakic glaucoma. METHODS: ECP was performed on 34 eyes of 25 patients under 16 years of age with aphakic or pseudophakic glaucoma between April 1994 and November 2004. Patients were followed for a minimum of 12 months or until a treatment failure had been declared. Treatment failure was defined as postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) of >24 mm Hg and IOP lowering of less than 15% despite the addition of glaucoma medications or the occurrence of any visually significant complications. Aphakic eyes of patients with congenital glaucoma or an anterior segment dysgenesis were not included in the study group. RESULTS: Pretreatment IOP averaged 32.6 mm Hg in the 34 eyes, compared with a final postoperative average of 22.9 mm Hg. Mean follow-up period for study eyes was 44.4 months, and the average number of procedures per eye was 1.5. Overall success rate was 53% (18/34). Thirteen of the 34 eyes (38%) received one treatment only and were deemed a success. Retinal detachments developed in two eyes within the first postoperative month. CONCLUSIONS: ECP is a useful tool in the treatment of aphakic and pseudophakic glaucoma, with a low rate of visually significant complications. Retreatment of eyes improved the overall success rate, although experience with cases beyond two treatment sessions is limited. Hypotony was not encountered despite 8 of the 34 eyes receiving 360 degrees of total endocyclophotoablation to the ciliary processes.     

The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology

BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken by the Goldmann applanation tonometer, the Tono-Pen and the ocular blood flow pneumotonometer in eyes with varying central corneal thickness (CCT) due to penetrating keratoplasty (PK), keratoconus (KC), and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED). METHODS: IOP was measured with the Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen XL, and OBF pneumotonometer in 127 eyes with the following corneal abnormalities. There were 56 eyes that had undergone PK, 37 eyes with KC, and 34 eyes with FED. CCT was measured using an ultrasound pachymeter after IOP determinations had been made. RESULTS: Mean IOP measurements in all three patient groups were significantly higher when measured by OBF pneumotonometer. Linear regression analysis showed that patients with FED had a significant increase in IOP with increasing CCT of 0.18 mm Hg/10 microm using the Goldmann tonometer, 0.15 mm Hg/10 microm with the Tono-Pen, and 0.26 mm Hg/10 microm with the OBF pneumotonometer. In patients with KC and after PK, linear regression analysis did not show a significant effect of CCT on IOP. A multivariate linear regression model controlling for age, sex, graft size, and patient group, showed that the effect of CCT on IOP for Tono-Pen (0.13 mm Hg/10 microm CCT) and Goldmann (0.14 mm Hg/10 microm CCT) were significantly lower than for the OBF pneumotonometer (0.26 mm Hg/10 microm CCT). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that mean IOP measurements using the OBF pneumotonometer were significantly higher than those made using the Goldmann applanation tonometer or Tono-Pen in eyes with a variety of cornel pathologies. The OBF pneumotonometer was found to be most affected by variation in CCT. For all three instruments, the relation between IOP and CCT depended on the corneal pathology and was greatest for FED.     

Novel pressure-to-cornea index in glaucoma

BACKGROUND: Several conversion tables and formulas have been suggested to correct applanation intraocular pressure (IOP) for central corneal thickness (CCT). CCT is also thought to represent an independent glaucoma risk factor. In an attempt to integrate IOP and CCT into a unified risk factor and avoid uncertain correction for tonometric inaccuracy, a new pressure-to-cornea index (PCI) is proposed. METHODS: PCI (IOP/CCT(3)) was defined as the ratio between untreated IOP and CCT(3) in mm (ultrasound pachymetry). PCI distribution in 220 normal controls, 53 patients with normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), 76 with ocular hypertension (OHT), and 89 with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) was investigated. PCI's ability to discriminate between glaucoma (NTG+POAG) and non-glaucoma (controls+OHT) was compared with that of three published formulae for correcting IOP for CCT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built. RESULTS: Mean PCI values were: Controls 92.0 (SD 24.8), NTG 129.1 (SD 25.8), OHT 134.0 (SD 26.5), POAG 173.6 (SD 40.9). To minimise IOP bias, eyes within the same 2 mm Hg range between 16 and 29 mm Hg (16-17, 18-19, etc) were separately compared: control and NTG eyes as well as OHT and POAG eyes differed significantly. PCI demonstrated a larger area under the ROC curve (AUC) and significantly higher sensitivity at fixed 80% and 90% specificities compared with each of the correction formulas; optimum PCI cut-off value 133.8. CONCLUSIONS: A PCI range of 120-140 is proposed as the upper limit of "normality", 120 being the cut-off value for eyes with untreated pressures or=22 mm Hg. PCI may reflect individual susceptibility to a given IOP level, and thus represent a glaucoma risk factor. Longitudinal studies are needed to prove its prognostic value.     

Correlations between corneal hysteresis, intraocular pressure, and corneal central pachymetry

PURPOSE: To analyze the correlation between corneal hysteresis (CH) measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA, Reichert) and ultrasonic corneal central thickness (CCT US) and intraocular pressure measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry (IOP GA). SETTING: Bordeaux 2 University, Ophthalmology Department, Bordeaux, France. METHODS: This study comprised 498 eyes of 258 patients. Corneal hysteresis, corneal resistance factor (CRF), and IOP corneal-compensated (IOPcc) were provided by the ORA device; CCT US and IOP GA were also measured in each eye. The study population was divided into 5 groups: normal (n = 122), glaucoma (n = 159), keratoconus (n = 88), laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (n = 78), and photorefractive keratectomy (n = 39). The Pearson correlation was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Corneal hysteresis was not strongly correlated with IOP or CCT US. The mean CH in the LASIK (8.87 mm Hg) and keratoconus (8.34 mm Hg) groups was lower than in the glaucoma (9.48 mm Hg) and normal (10.26 mm Hg) groups. The lower the CH, the lower its correlation with IOPcc and IOP GA. A CH higher than the CRF was significantly associated with the keratoconus and post-LASIK groups. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal hysteresis, a new corneal parameter, had a moderate dependence on IOP and CCT US. Weaker corneas could be screened with ORA parameters, and low CH could be considered a risk factor for underestimation of IOP. The CCT US should continue to be considered a useful parameter.     

Glaucoma and increased central corneal thickness in aphakic and pseudophakic patients after congenital cataract surgery

AIM: To compare the mean central corneal thickness (CCT) among aphakic and pseudophakic patients following congenital cataract surgery with age matched controls. METHODS: This study included 43 eyes of 43 aphakic and pseudophakic patients following congenital cataract surgery. 44 healthy, age and sex matched volunteers were recruited for comparison with the patients. After a complete eye examination, corneal thickness and intraocular pressure were measured. RESULTS: In the study group, 33 eyes were aphakic, and the remaining 10 eyes were pseudophakic. The median CCT was 556.0 microm (range 490-640 microm) in the control group and 626 microm (range 523-870 microm) in the study group (p<0.05). There was a significant difference in CCT between aphakic and pseudophakic eyes in which an intraocular lens (IOL) had been implanted at the time of congenital cataract surgery (p = 0.011). The same difference was not observed between aphakic and pseudophakic eyes in which an IOL had been implanted secondarily (p = 0.835). The median age of the patients at the time of lensectomy was 24 months (range 1 week to 120 months). There was a negative correlation between the age at lensectomy and CCT (r = -0.485, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Aphakic and pseudophakic patients have significantly thicker corneas than age matched controls. This difference can have an important effect on interpreting intraocular pressures in these patients. It is also important to assess the effects of early surgery for congenital cataracts, as well as those of primary and secondary IOL implantation, on CCT.     

Changes in corneal hysteresis after clear corneal cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To assess the changes in corneal hysteresis (CH) as measured by the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA; Reichert Ophthalmic Instruments, Buffalo, New York, USA) to describe the influence of clear corneal cataract surgery on corneal viscoelastic properties and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by noncontact tonometry (NCT) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional, comparative study. METHODS: One hundred and one eyes of 101 consecutive patients who underwent routine clear corneal cataract surgery were evaluated. CH, NCT, and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured by ORA before surgery and at postoperative day 1. A control group of 48 pseudophakic eyes (surgery >3 months previously) was included. RESULTS: CCT increased from 556.82 +/- 32.5 microm before surgery to 580.26 +/- 45.5 microm after surgery (P < .001; control, 555.16 +/- 42.33 microm). Mean CH decreased from 10.35 +/- 2.5 mm Hg before surgery to 9.20 +/- 1.9 mm Hg after surgery (P < .001; control, 10.47 +/- 1.63 mm Hg). NCT values rose from 17.85 +/- 3.8 mm Hg before surgery to 20.10 +/- 6.3 mm Hg after surgery. GAT values were 14.85 +/- 2.8 mm Hg before surgery and 15.24 +/- 4.1 mm Hg after surgery (P = .52). There was no significant difference of CCT or CH between the preoperative values and the values of the control group (CCT, P = .986; CH, P = .166), in contrast to the difference between postoperative values and the values of the control group (CCT, P = .005; CH, P = .031). CONCLUSIONS: At day 1 after clear corneal cataract surgery, CH is diminished, whereas CCT is increased significantly. Postoperative corneal edema leads to a change of corneal viscoelastic properties, resulting in a lower damping capacity of the cornea. It is supposed that GAT and NCT measurements are significantly different because of postoperative changes in viscoelastic properties of the cornea.     

Inter-instrument agreement and influence of central corneal thickness on measurements with Goldmann, pneumotonometer and noncontact tonometer in glaucomatous eyes

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by the Goldman applanation tonometer (GAT), non contact tonometer (NCT) and the ocular blood flow (OBF) pneumotonometer in different IOP ranges in glaucomatous eyes. The effect of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurement in chronic glaucomatous eyes using the three different tonometers was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: IOP measurements of 130 eyes of primary glaucoma patients were performed using GAT by an ophthalmologist while NCT and OBF-pneumotonometer measurements were performed by an experienced optometrist. The IOP values were compared amongst the three instruments in the three different IOP ranges (0-18 mmHg, > 18 to 25 mmHg, > 25 mmHg). CCT was also measured in all patients. RESULTS: The mean of paired difference between GAT and NCT was 0.9 +/- 3.1 mmHg while that between GAT and OBF-pneumotonometer was 0.3 +/- 3.4 mmHg. The OBF-pneumotonometer and NCT were more affected by corneal thickness (0.41 mmHg and 0.4 mmHg / 10 micro corneal thickness respectively) while GAT was the least affected by corneal thickness (0.3 mmHg / 10 micro corneal thickness) though the difference was not statistically significant ( P =0.42). CONCLUSION: With appropriate correction for corneal thickness the NCT and OBF-pneumotonometer can be used as reliably as GAT in following up glaucomatous patients.     

中央角膜厚度、角膜曲率对Goldmann压平眼压计和非接触眼压计测量结果的影响

目的 探讨中央角膜厚度和角膜曲率对Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)和非接触眼压计(NCT)测量结果 的影响.方法 比较性研究.选择120例门诊患者作为研究对象.应用超声角膜测厚仪测量患者中央角膜厚度,采用多功能验光仪测量角膜曲率,应用GAT和NCT测量受检者双眼眼压.应用SPSS 12.0统计学软件进行数据处理.采用直线回归法比较两种眼压计的测量结果 ,采用多重线性同归法分析中央角膜厚度、角膜曲率与两种眼压计所测眼压值的关系,应用Bland-Altman法比较NCT和GAT两种方法 对眼压测最结果 的影响.结果 GAT与NCT测量的平均眼压值分别为(18.4±4.0)mm Hg(1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa)和(17.0±4.6)mm Hg,差异有统计学意义(r=0.835,P=0.000).GAT和NCT测量的眼压值均受中央角膜厚度和角膜曲率的影响.中央角膜厚度每增加1μm,GAT测量眼压值增加0.039 mm Hg,而NCT测量眼压值增加0.064 mm Hg.角膜曲率半径每增加1 mm,GAT测最眼压值减少2.648 mm Hg,NCT测量眼压值减少3.190 nun Hg.中央角膜厚度对NCT测量眼压值的影响较其对于GAT测量眼压值的影响大.随着眼压的升高,NCT测最眼压值呈现出由低于GAT测量值到高于GAT测量值的逐渐变化趋势.结论 中央角膜厚度和角膜曲率均会影响NCT和GAT测量眼压值,而且中央角膜厚度对NCT测量眼压值的影响较其对GAT测量眼压值的影响大.