Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a narrow QRS complex.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients with narrow QRS complex (<120 ms) and evidence of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony on tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is beneficial in selected heart failure patients with wide QRS complex (> or =120 ms). Patients with narrow QRS complex are currently not eligible for CRT, and the potential effects of CRT are not well studied. METHODS: Thirty-three consecutive patients with narrow QRS complex and 33 consecutive patients with wide QRS complex (control group) were prospectively included. All patients needed to have LV dyssynchrony > or =65 ms on TDI, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III/IV heart failure, and LV ejection fraction < or =35%. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, particularly LV dyssynchrony, were comparable between patients with narrow and wide QRS complex (110 +/- 8 ms vs. 175 +/- 22 ms; p = NS). No significant relationship was observed between baseline QRS duration and LV dyssynchrony (r = 0.21; p = NS). The improvement in clinical symptoms and LV reverse remodeling was comparable between patients with narrow and wide QRS complex (mean NYHA functional class reduction 0.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 1.1 +/- 0.6 [p = NS] and mean LV end-systolic volume reduction 39 +/- 34 ml vs. 44 +/- 46 ml [p = NS]). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy appears to be beneficial in patients with narrow QRS complex and severe LV dyssynchrony on TDI, with similar improvement in symptoms and comparable LV reverse remodeling to patients with wide QRS complex. The current results need confirmation in larger patient cohorts.     

Transseptal endocardial left ventricular pacing: an alternative technique for coronary sinus lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: Coronary sinus (CS) lead placement for transvenous left ventricular (LV) pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has a failure rate at implant and short-term follow-up between 10% and 15%. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of transseptal endocardial LV pacing in patients in whom transvenous CS lead placement had failed. METHODS: An atrial transseptal LV lead placement was attempted in 10 patients (six females, age 69.4 +/- 9.6 years), in whom CS lead placement for CRT had failed. After transseptal puncture and septal dilatation from the femoral route, the left atrium was cannulated with a combination of catheters and guide wires from the left or right subclavian vein. After advancement of this guide catheter into the LV, a standard bipolar screw-in lead could be implanted in the posterolateral wall. All patients were maintained on anticoagulant therapy with warfarin after implant. RESULTS: An LV lead could be successfully implanted in nine of the 10 patients. The stimulation threshold was 0.78 +/- 0.24 V, and the R-wave amplitude was 14.2 +/- 9.7 mV. At 2 months' follow-up, the stimulation threshold was 1.48 +/- 0.35 V with a 0.064 +/- 0.027 ms pulse width. There was no phrenic nerve stimulation observed in any of the patients. There were no thromboembolic complications at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: LV transseptal endocardial lead implantation from the pectoral area is a feasible approach in patients with a failed CS approach and in whom epicardial surgical lead placement is not an option. Longer follow-up is warranted to determine the risk of thromboembolic complications.     

Effect of concordance between sites of left ventricular pacing and dyssynchrony on acute electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters in patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND: Wide QRS complexes are associated with left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony, but an optimal site of LV pacing has not been established. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that concordance between the sites of LV pacing and of latest LV mechanical activation during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is associated with more favorable acute echocardiographic changes. METHODS: An analysis of 28 consecutive patients (64+/-15 years, 46% male, 52% ischemic heart disease, LV ejection fraction 0.24+/-0.07, QRS 163+/-22 ms, New York Heart Association > or = 3 93%) implanted with biventricular (BIV) defibrillators was performed. Sites of latest LV activation were determined by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and speckle tracking (ST). The site of LV pacing was determined by fluoroscopy in two views. A concordance score (0-5) was created to describe the proximity of the pacing site to the site of the latest mechanical activation. RESULTS: Compared with the worst concordance score, a perfect score was associated with shorter QRS width with LV (187+/-40 vs. 246+/-8 ms, p= 0.048) and BIV (134+/-19 ms vs. 179+/-39 ms, p = 0.05) but not with right ventricular pacing. A perfect concordance score was also associated with a greater acute reduction in LV volumes in systole (42+/-36 ms 16+/-22 ms, p = 0.068) and diastole (47+/-37 vs. 8+/-31 ml, p = 0.043) 24 h after CRT device implantation. CONCLUSIONS: A high concordance is associated with shorter QRS width with LV and BIV pacing and greater acute reduction in LV volumes. The effect of concordance on the intermediate and long-term response to BIV pacing deserves further evaluation.     

Comparison of chronic biventricular pacing between epicardial and endocardial left ventricular stimulation using Doppler tissue imaging in patients with heart failure.

In patients with a wide QRS, drug-resistant heart failure, and a coronary sinus that is unsuitable for transvenous biventricular pacing (BVP), a transseptal approach from the right to left atrium can allow endocardial left ventricular (LV) pacing (with permanent anticoagulant therapy) instead of epicardial pacing via the coronary sinus branches. We sought to compare the effects of endocardial pacing with those of epicardial LV pacing on regional LV electromechanical delay (EMD) and contractility. Twenty-three patients (68 +/- 8 years) with severe heart failure and QRS > or =130 ms received a pacemaker for BVP. Fifteen patients underwent epicardial LV pacing, and 8 underwent endocardial LV pacing because of an unsuitable coronary sinus. All LV leads were placed at the anterolateral LV wall. Six months after implant, echocardiography and Doppler tissue imaging were performed. LV wall velocities and regional EMDs (time interval between the onset of the QRS and local ventricular systolic motion) were calculated for the 4 LV walls and compared for each patient between right ventricular (RV) and BVP. The amplitude of regional LV contractility was also assessed. Epicardial BVP reduced the septal wall EMD by 11% versus RV pacing (p = 0.05) and the lateral wall EMD by 41% versus RV pacing (p <0.01). With endocardial BVP, the septal and lateral EMDs were 21.3% and 54%, respectively (p <0.01, compared with epicardial BVP). The mitral time-velocity integral increased by 40% with endocardial BVP versus 2% with epicardial BVP (p <0.01). The amplitude of the lateral LV wall systolic motion increased by 14% with epicardial BVP versus 31% with endocardial BVP (p = 0.01). This resulted in a LV shortening fraction increase of 25% in patients with endocardial BVP (p = 0.05). However, all patients were clinically improved at the end of follow-up. Thus, in heart failure patients with BVP, endocardial BVP provides more homogenous intraventricular resynchronization than epicardial BVP and is associated with better LV filling and systolic performance.     

Ventricular pacing lead location alters systemic hemodynamics and left ventricular function in patients with and without reduced ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVES: We compared left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function during right ventricular (RV), LV, and biventricular (BiV) pacing in patients with narrow QRS duration with and without LV dysfunction. BACKGROUND: The optimal RV pacing lead location for patients with a standard indication for ventricular pacing remains controversial. METHODS: Left ventricular pressure and volume data were determined via conductance catheter during electrophysiology study in 31 patients divided into groups with ejection fraction (EF) > or =40% (n = 17) or EF <40% (n = 14). QRS duration was 91 +/- 18 versus 106 +/- 25 ms, respectively (p = NS). Hemodynamic data were recorded during atrial and dual chamber pacing from the RV apex, RV free wall, RV septum, LV free wall, and BiV. RESULTS: In patients with EF > or =40%, RV pacing at 1 or more sites, but not LV free wall or BiV pacing, significantly (p < 0.05) impaired cardiac output (CO), stroke work (SW), EF, and LV relaxation compared with atrial overdrive pacing. Right ventricular pacing also impaired hemodynamics and LV function in patients with EF <40%. However, LV and BiV pacing increased CO, SW, EF, and LV +dP/dt(MAX) in patients with LV dysfunction. Left ventricular and BiV pacing enhanced an index of global LV cycle efficiency in patients with depressed EF. The detrimental hemodynamic effects of RV pacing were attenuated by selecting the optimal RV pacing site. CONCLUSIONS: Right ventricular pacing worsens LV function in patients with and without LV dysfunction unless the RV pacing site is optimized. Left ventricular and BiV pacing preserve LV function in patients with EF >40% and improve function in patients with EF <40% despite no clinical indication for BiV pacing.     

Tailored echocardiographic interventricular delay programming further optimizes left ventricular performance after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of cardiac resynchronization therapy is correction of left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. However, little is known about the optimal timing of LV and right ventricular (RV) stimulation. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acute hemodynamic effects of biventricular pacing, using a range of interventricular delays in patients with advanced heart failure. METHODS: Twenty patients with dilated ischemic (n = 12) and idiopathic (n = 8) cardiomyopathy (age 66 +/- 6 years, New York Heart Association class III-IV, LV end-diastolic diameter >55 mm, ejection fraction 22% +/- 18%, and QRS 200 +/- 32 ms) were implanted with a biventricular resynchronization device with sequential RV and LV timing (VV) capabilities. Tissue Doppler echocardiographic parameters were measured during sinus rhythm before implantation and following an optimal AV interval with both simultaneous and sequential biventricular pacing. The interventricular interval was modified by advancing the LV stimulus (LV first) or RV stimulus (RV first) up to 60 ms. For each stimulation protocol, standard echocardiographic Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) echo were used to measure the LV outflow tract velocity-time integral, LV filling time, intraventricular delay, and interventricular delay. RESULTS: The highest velocity-time integral was found in 12 patients with LV first stimulation, 5 patients with RV first stimulation, and 3 patients with simultaneous biventricular activation. Compared with simultaneous biventricular pacing, the optimized sequential biventricular pacing significantly increased the velocity-time integral (P <.001) and LV filling time (P = .001) and decreased interventricular delay (P = .013) and intraventricular delay (P = .010). The optimal VV interval could not be predicted by any clinical nor echocardiographic parameter. At 6-month follow-up, the incidence of nonresponders was 10%. CONCLUSION: Optimal timing of the interventricular interval results in prolongation of the LV filling time, reduction of interventricular asynchrony, and an increase in stroke volume. In patients with advanced heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy, LV hemodynamics may be further improved by optimizing LV-RV delay.     

Dispersion of repolarization in cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND: Proarrhythmic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as a result of increased transmural dispersion of repolarization (TDR) induced by left ventricular (LV) epicardial pacing in a subset of vulnerable patients have been reported. The possibility of identifying these patients by ECG repolarization indices has been suggested. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test whether repolarization indices on the ECG can be used to measure dispersion of repolarization during pacing. METHODS: CRT devices of 28 heart failure patients were switched among biventricular, LV, and right ventricular (RV) pacing. ECG indices proposed to measure dispersion of repolarization were calculated. The effects of CRT on repolarization were simulated in ECGSIM, a mathematical model of electrocardiogram genesis. TDR was calculated as the difference in repolarization time between the epicardial and endocardial nodes of the heart model. RESULTS: Patients: The interval from the apex to the end of the T wave was shorter during biventricular pacing (102 +/- 18 ms) and LV pacing (106 +/- 21 ms) than during RV pacing (117 +/- 22 ms, P < or =.005). T-wave amplitude and area were low during biventricular pacing (287 +/- 125 microV and 56 +/- 22 microV.s, respectively, P = .0006 vs RV pacing). T-wave complexity was high during biventricular pacing (0.42 +/- 0.26, P = .004 vs RV pacing). Simulations: Repolarization patterns were highly similar to the preceding depolarization patterns. The repolarization patterns of different pacing modes explained the observed magnitudes of the ECG repolarization indices. Average and local TDR were not different between pacing modes. CONCLUSION: In patients treated with CRT, ECG repolarization indices are related to pacing-induced activation sequences rather than transmural dispersion. TDR during biventricular and LV pacing is not larger than TDR during conventional RV endocardial pacing.     

心力衰竭再同步治疗中小切口心外膜左心室电极置入的补救技术

目的 探讨小切口心外膜左心室电极置入行心脏再同步化治疗.方法 6例心力衰竭患者拟行心脏再同步化治疗,冠状窦途径失败后采用小切口心外膜置入左心室电极,同时经静脉置入右心房、右心室电极.术后随访1年,评价心功能和左心室电极参数.结果 经小切口心外膜途径,所有患者均成功将左心室电极置入到理想部位.无术中并发症,无住院期间死亡,无膈肌刺激征.术中,左心室起搏阈值为(1.2±0.5)V;术后12个月,左心室起搏阈值为(1.1±0.4)V.12个月随访时,6 min步行[(327±77)m比(267±68)m,P=0.001]明显增加,纽约心功能分级明显改善,左室射血分数明显增加[(26.1±6.0)%比(38.2±4.7)%,P:0.004],左心室舒张末期内径明显减少[(72.2±6.8)mnl比(84.1±7.2)mm,P=0.001].结论 小切口心外膜置入左心室电极安全、有效,可以作为经冠状窦途径置人失败患者的替代治疗.     

Left ventricular dyssynchrony predicts right ventricular remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to evaluate right ventricular (RV) remodeling after six months of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is beneficial in patients with end-stage heart failure. The effect of CRT on RV size is currently unknown. Accordingly, the effects of CRT on RV size, severity of tricuspid regurgitation, and pulmonary artery pressure were evaluated. METHODS: Fifty-six consecutive patients with end-stage heart failure (52% ischemic cardiomyopathy), left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) < or =35%, QRS duration >120 ms, and left bundle branch block were included. Clinical parameters, LV volumes, LVEF, LV dyssynchrony, and RV chamber size were assessed at baseline and after six months of CRT; LV dyssynchrony was assessed using tissue Doppler imaging. RESULTS: Clinical parameters improved significantly; LV dyssynchrony was acutely reduced after CRT and remained unchanged at six-month follow-up. Left ventricular EF improved significantly from 19 +/- 6% to 26 +/- 8% (p < 0.001), and LV end-diastolic volume decreased from 257 +/- 98 ml to 227 +/- 86 ml (p < 0.001). Right ventricular annulus decreased significantly from 37 +/- 9 mm to 32 +/- 10 mm, RV short-axis from 29 +/- 11 mm to 26 +/- 7 mm, and RV long-axis from 89 +/- 11 mm to 82 +/- 10 mm (all p < 0.001). Left ventricular and RV reverse remodeling were only observed in patients with substantial LV dyssynchrony at baseline. Finally, significant reductions in severity of tricuspid regurgitation and pulmonary artery pressure were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy results in significant reverse LV and RV remodeling after six months of CRT in patients with LV dyssynchrony. Moreover, CRT leads to a reduction of the severity of tricuspid regurgitation and a decrease in pulmonary artery pressure.     

Benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure patients with narrow QRS complexes and coexisting systolic asynchrony by echocardiography.

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the role of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure (HF) patients with narrow QRS complexes (<120 ms) and echocardiographic evidence of mechanical asynchrony. BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy is currently recommended to advanced HF patients with prolonged QRS duration. Echocardiographic assessment of systolic mechanical asynchrony has been proven useful to predict a favorable response after CRT. METHODS: A total of 102 HF patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV were enrolled. Among them, 51 had wide QRS (>120 ms) and 51 had narrow QRS (<120 ms). Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was employed to select patients with systolic asynchrony (increased asynchrony index) in the narrow-QRS group. Clinical and echocardiographic assessments were performed at baseline and 3 months after CRT. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction of left ventricular (LV) end-systolic volume in both narrow (122 +/- 42 cc vs. 103 +/- 47 cc, p < 0.001) and wide (148 +/- 74 cc vs. 112 +/- 64 cc, p < 0.001) QRS groups. Improvement of NYHA functional class (both p < 0.001), maximal exercise capacity (both p < 0.05), 6-min hall-walk distance (both p < 0.01), ejection fraction (both p < 0.001), and mitral regurgitation (both p < 0.005) was also observed. In both groups, the degree of baseline mechanical asynchrony determined LV reverse remodeling to a similar extent, as shown by the superimposed regression lines. Withholding CRT for 4 weeks resulted in loss of echocardiographic benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy for HF patients with narrow QRS complexes and coexisting mechanical asynchrony by TDI results in LV reverse remodeling and improvement of clinical status. The amplitude of benefit is similar to the wide-QRS group provided that similar extent of systolic asynchrony is selected.     

Tissue Doppler imaging predicts improved systolic performance and reversed left ventricular remodeling during long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the long-term impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on left ventricular (LV) performance and remodeling using three-dimensional echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging (TDI). BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional echocardiography and TDI allow rapid and accurate evaluation of LV volumes and performance. METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients with severe heart failure and bundle branch block who underwent biventricular pacemaker implantation were included. Before and after implantation of the pacemaker, three-dimensional echocardiography and TDI were performed. These examinations were repeated at outpatient visits every six months. RESULTS: Five patients (20%) died during one-year follow-up. In the remaining 20 patients, significant reductions in LV end-diastolic volume and LV end-systolic volume of 9.6 +/- 14% and 16.5 +/- 15%, respectively (p < 0.01), could be demonstrated during long-term follow-up. Accordingly, LV ejection fraction increased by 21.7 +/- 18% (p < 0.01). According to a newly developed TDI technique-tissue tracking-all regional myocardial segments improved their longitudinal systolic shortening (p < 0.01). The extent of the LV base displaying delayed longitudinal contraction, as detected by TDI before pacemaker implantation, predicted long-term efficacy of CRT. The QRS duration failed to predict resynchronization efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac resynchronization significantly improved LV function and reversed LV remodeling during long-term follow-up. Patients likely to benefit from CRT can be identified by TDI before implantation of a biventricular pacemaker.     

Importance of contractile reserve for CRT.

AIMS: To assess whether response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is related to myocardial viability in the paced left ventricular (LV) region, evaluated by contractile reserve (CR). Non-response to CRT may partly be due to inefficient pacing by the LV lead located in a fibrotic area. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nineteen patients (64 +/- 13 years, 14 men, 9 ischaemic) with severe heart failure (EF = 27 +/- 8%, QRS = 154 +/- 25 ms) were included in the week after device implantation. Stroke volume (SV) and LV dyssynchrony (by Tissue Doppler Imaging) were successively assessed with CRT on and CRT off. Afterwards, CRT device was maintained off during dobutamine infusion to assess CR in the LV-pacing region. LV end-systolic volume (ESV) was assessed after 6 months to quantify reverse remodelling. CR in the paced LV region (n = 10, 5/9 ischaemic and 5/10 non-ischaemic) was correlated to a reduction in LV dyssynchrony under CRT (120 +/- 76 vs. 78 +/- 64 ms, P = 0.02). Conversely, LV dyssynchrony was unchanged (161 +/- 100 vs. 163 +/- 80 ms) without CR. In desynchronized patients (>65 ms, n = 15), increase in SV under CRT and changes in ESV at 6 months were +22 and -18%, respectively, when CR was present and 0% and +9%, respectively, when absent. CONCLUSION: Acute haemodynamic response and reverse remodelling under CRT require viability in the target region of LV lead.     

Right atrial pacing impairs cardiac function during resynchronization therapy: acute effects of DDD pacing compared to VDD pacing

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the hemodynamic effects of right-atrial-paced (DDD) and right-atrial-sensed (VDD) biventricular paced rhythm on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves hemodynamics in patients with severe heart failure and left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony. However, the impact of active right atrial pacing on resynchronization therapy is unknown. METHODS: Seventeen CRT patients were studied 10 months (range: 1 to 46 months) after implantation. At baseline, the programmed atrioventricular delay was optimized by timing LV contraction properly at the end of atrial contraction. In both modes the acute hemodynamic effects were assessed by multiple Doppler echocardiographic parameters. RESULTS: Compared to DDD pacing, VDD pacing resulted in much better improvement of intraventricular dyssynchrony assessed by the septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (VDD 106 +/- 83 ms vs. DDD 145 +/- 95 ms; p = 0.001), whereas the interventricular mechanical delay (difference between onset of pulmonary and aortic outflow) did not differ (VDD 20 +/- 21 ms vs. DDD 18 +/- 17 ms; p = NS). Furthermore, VDD pacing significantly prolonged the rate-corrected LV filling period (VDD 458 +/- 123 ms vs. DDD 371 +/- 94 ms; p = 0.0001) and improved the myocardial performance index (VDD 0.60 +/- 0.18 vs. DDD 0.71 +/- 0.23; p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that avoidance of right atrial pacing results in a higher degree of LV resynchronization, in a substantial prolongation of the LV filling period, and in an improved myocardial performance. Thus, the VDD mode seems to be superior to the DDD mode in CRT patients.     

The ECG in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: Influence of Left and Right Ventricular Preactivation and Relation to Acute Response

Influence of Preactivation on the ECG in CRT. Introduction: The aims of this study were to compare ECG signs of biventricular electrical resynchronization during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with various interventricular (VV) delays and to correlate these and other ECG characteristics with the acute hemodynamic benefit of CRT. Methods and Results: Thirty‐four patients with heart failure and a left bundle branch block (LBBB) pattern were prospectively enrolled. A 12‐lead surface ECG and the relative improvement in left ventricular (LV) dP/dt_max (the maximum rate of pressure rise) were recorded at baseline and during CRT with VV delays varying from 80 ms LV preactivation to 40 ms right ventricular (RV) preactivation. Rightward QRS‐axis shift occurred in 71–80% among all VV delays. Activation reversal to dominant negative in leads I/aVL was progressively observed at increasing LV preactivation (53–65%) and less (18–22%) during RV preactivation. Activation reversal to dominant positive in leads V1/V2 was observed in 21–27% during LV preactivation and in 6–15% during RV preactivation. Higher acute response to CRT was independently predicted by a complete LBBB at baseline (regression coefficient B = 7.7 [0.3–15.0], P = 0.042), later timing of LV depolarization within the QRS at baseline (Q‐LVsense: B = 0.2 [0.1–0.3], P = 0.002), and biventricular electrical resynchronization during CRT as evidenced by activation reversal in leads I/aVL (B = 9.9 [3.2–16.6], P = 0.005). Conclusion: ECG signs of biventricular electrical resynchronization are present over a wide range of LV preactivated VV delays but to a lesser extent during RV preactivation. The presence of complete LBBB and longer Q‐LVsense at baseline and signs of biventricular electrical resynchronization during CRT predict higher acute hemodynamic response. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 23, pp. 1237–1245, November 2012)     

Combined longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony predicts ventricular response after resynchronization therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a combined echocardiographic assessment of longitudinal dyssynchrony by tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and radial dyssynchrony by speckle-tracking strain may predict left ventricular (LV) functional response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). BACKGROUND: Mechanical LV dyssynchrony is associated with response to CRT; however, complex patterns may exist. METHODS: We studied 190 heart failure patients (ejection fraction [EF] 23 +/- 6%, QRS duration 168 +/- 27 ms) before and after CRT. Longitudinal dyssynchrony was assessed by color TDI for time to peak velocity (2 sites in all and 12 sites in a subgroup of 67). Radial dyssynchrony was assessed by speckle-tracking radial strain. The LV response was defined as > or =15% increase in EF. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six patients (93%) had technically sufficient baseline and follow-up data available. Overall, 34% were EF nonresponders at 6 +/- 3 months after CRT. When both longitudinal dyssynchrony by 2-site TDI (> or =60 ms) and radial dyssynchrony (> or =130 ms) were positive, 95% of patients had an EF response; when both were negative, 21% had an EF response (p < 0.001 vs. both positive). The EF response rate was lowest (10%) when dyssynchrony was negative using 12-site TDI and radial strain (p < 0.001 vs. both positive). When either longitudinal or radial dyssynchrony was positive (but not both), 59% had an EF response. Combined longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony predicted EF response with 88% sensitivity and 80% specificity, which was significantly better than either technique alone (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Combined patterns of longitudinal and radial dyssynchrony can be predictive of LV functional response after CRT.     

Electrocardiographic Follow‐Up of Biventricular Pacemakers

Multisite pacing for the treatment of heart failure has added a new dimension to the electrocardiographic evaluation of device function. During left ventricular (LV) pacing from the appropriate site in the coronary venous system, a correctly positioned lead V1 registers a right bundle branch block pattern with few exceptions. During biventricular stimulation associated with right ventricular (RV) apical pacing, the QRS is often positive in lead V1. The frontal plane QRS axis is usually in the right superior quadrant and occasionally in the left superior quadrant. Barring incorrect placement of lead V1 (too high on the chest), lack of LV capture, LV lead displacement or marked latency (exit block or delay from the stimulation site), ventricular fusion with the spontaneous QRS complex, a negative QRS complex in lead V1 during biventricular pacing involving the RV apex probably reflects different activation of an heterogeneous biventricular substrate (ischemia, scar, His‐Purkinje participation in view of the varying patterns of LV activation in spontaneous left bundle branch block) and does not necessarily indicate a poor (electrical or mechanical) contribution from LV stimulation. In this situation, it is imperative to rule out the presence of coronary venous pacing via the middle cardiac vein or even unintended placement of two leads in the RV. During biventricular pacing with the RV lead in the outflow tract, the paced QRS in lead V1 is often negative and the frontal plane paced QRS axis is often directed to the right inferior quadrant (right axis deviation). In patients with sinus rhythm and a relatively short PR interval, ventricular fusion with competing native conduction during biventricular pacing may cause misinterpretation of the ECG because narrowing of the paced QRS complex simulates appropriate biventricular capture. This represents a common pitfall in device follow‐up. Elimination of ventricular fusion by shortening the AV delay, is often associated with clinical improvement. Anodal stimulation may complicate threshold testing and should not be misinterpreted as pacemaker malfunction. One must be cognizant of the various disturbances that can disrupt 1:1 atrial tracking and cause loss of ventricular resynchronization. (1) Upper rate response. The upper rate response of biventricular pacemakers differs from the traditional Wenckebach upper rate response of conventional antibradycardia pacemakers because heart failure patients generally do not have sinus bradycardia or AV junctional conduction delay. The programmed upper rate should be sufficiently fast to avoid loss of resynchronization in situations associated with sinus tachycardia. (2) Below the programmed upper rate. This may be caused by a variety of events (especially ventricular premature complexes and favored by the presence of first‐degree AV block) that alter the timing of sensed and paced events. In such cases, atrial events become trapped into the postventricular atrial refractory period at atrial rates below the programmed upper rate in the presence of spontaneous AV conduction. Algorithms are available to restore resynchronization by automatic temporary abbreviation of the postventricular atrial refractory period.     

Evidence of left ventricular dyssynchrony resulting from right ventricular pacing in patients with severely depressed left ventricular ejection fraction.

AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has recently emerged as an effective treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe systolic heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB). Right ventricular pacing (RVP) leads to an LBBB-like pattern in the electrocardiogram. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency of ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony in patients induced by RVP. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study included 33 patients with a conventional single or dual chamber pacemaker, 18 with ejection fraction (EF) > 35% and 15 with EF < or = 35%. In all patients, an intrinsic rhythm without intraventricular conduction delay (QRS < or = 120 ms) was present without RVP. Two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic criteria for mechanical dyssynchrony [aortic pre-ejection delay (APE), interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD), delayed activation of the posterior left ventricular wall (PD), septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (SPWMD)] were evaluated in all patients with and without RVP. QRS duration showed no difference between the two EF-groups without RVP (93 +/- 10 vs. 96 +/- 9 ms), but was significantly longer in patients with low EF with RVP (152 +/- 18 vs. 181 +/- 18 ms; P < 0.001). In patients with EF > 35%, only APE was slightly prolonged by RVP (111 +/- 20 vs. 129 +/- 17 ms; P = 0.03), whereas in patients with EF < or = 35% marked pathological differences in APE (118 +/- 29 vs. 169 +/- 24 ms; P < 0.001), IVMD (22 +/- 17 vs. 58 +/- 14 ms; P < 0.001), SPWMD (103 +/- 28 vs. 125 +/- 29 ms; P = 0.004), and PD (-21 +/- 25 vs. - 39 +/- 25 ms; P = 0.005) were found. A significant correlation between QRS duration and mechanical ventricular dyssynchrony was only found for two echocardiographic parameters (IVMD, APE) with RVP. CONCLUSION: In patients with a conventional pacemaker, mechanical dyssynchrony with RVP was shown exceptionally in patients with preserved or moderately depressed systolic left ventricular (LV) function, but in nearly all patients with severely depressed systolic LV function. These patients might benefit from CRT when frequent RVP is required.     

Mechanical dyssynchrony by 3D echo correlates with acute haemodynamic response to biventricular pacing in heart failure patients.

AIMS: One-third of dilated cardiomyopathy patients receiving a biventricular pacing-device do not respond to this form of therapy. Therefore, the utility of mechanical dyssynchrony by real-time 3D echocardiography (RT3DE) for predicting systolic response to biventricular pacing, of which maximal rate of pressure rise (dP/dt(max)) served as the gold-standard, was evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventeen consecutive heart failure patients (aged 64 +/- 10 years, 8 male, 6 ischaemic cardiomyopathy, mean QRS duration 136 +/- 32 ms) underwent RT3DE and biventricular pacing. Post-processing software provided data of global left ventricular (LV) function and the systolic dyssynchrony index of 17 LV segments (SDI(17), %) for mechanical dyssynchrony. During biventricular pacing, percentual change in dP/dt(max) compared to the non-pacing mode, DeltadP/dt(max) was measured invasively with conductance catheters. LV ejection fraction was 31 +/- 10%, SDI(17) was 10.2 +/- 4.2% and percentual DeltadP/dt(max) during biventricular pacing was 14.5 +/- 12.4. A significant correlation (r = 0.729, P = 0.001) was found between SDI(17) and percentual DeltadP/dt(max), and between QRS duration and percentual DeltadP/dt(max) (r = 0.721, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The present study suggests that mechanical dyssynchrony measured by RT3DE shows a good correlation with invasively determined acute haemodynamic response to biventricular pacing in patients with symptomatic dilated cardiomyopathy. Future studies are needed to further define the clinical utility of RT3DE in identifying patients who are most likely to respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy.     

Impact of acute biventricular pacing on left ventricular performance and volumes in patients with severe heart failure. A tissue doppler and three-dimensional echocardiographic study

OBJECTIVES: We used tissue velocity imaging (TVI) and three-dimensional echocardiography to evaluate the effect of acute biventricular pacing on left ventricular (LV) performance and volumes in patients with severe heart failure and bundle branch block. BACKGROUND: Biventricular pacing causes acute hemodynamic improvement in patients with severe heart failure, and QRS duration has been used as a predictor of improved resynchronization. Tissue velocity has the potential of demonstrating the degree of LV resynchronization and three-dimensional echocardiography enables accurate quantitation of LV volumes and function. METHODS: TVI and three-dimensional echocardiography were performed during sinus rhythm and biventricular pacing in 25 consecutive patients with severe heart failure. RESULTS: Biventricular pacing significantly improved the extent of contracting myocardium in synchrony by 15.4% and the duration of contraction synchrony by 17% (p < 0.05 for both). Furthermore, end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes decreased by 7 +/- 4.5% and 13 +/- 6% (p < 0.01) and ejection fraction increased by 22.8 +/- 9% (p < 0.01). Baseline duration of QRS and the preejection period as well as the extent of myocardium with asynchronous contraction measured by TVI predicted pacing efficacy. In multivariate analysis, only the extent of myocardium with asynchronous contraction at the LV base predicted biventricular pacing efficacy. CONCLUSION: Biventricular pacing improves LV systolic performance and reduces LV volumes during short-term treatment. TVI provides important pathophysiological information on the degree of LV resynchronization and may contribute to improved patient selection.     

Assessment of left ventricular dyssynchrony in patients with conduction delay and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy: head-to-head comparison between tissue doppler imaging and velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) with velocity-encoded (VE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony assessment. BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is proposed for patients with heart failure, depressed LV function, and a wide QRS complex. Selection is based mainly on electrocardiogram criteria, but recent data suggest that intraventricular dyssynchrony may be preferred for selection. An LV dyssynchrony can adequately be assessed with TDI, but this has not been compared directly with other imaging modalities. A VE MRI potentially allows direct myocardial wall motion measurements similar to TDI. METHODS: Twenty patients with heart failure, systolic LV dysfunction, and a wide QRS complex were included, as well as 10 normal individuals with normal QRS duration and LV function. The TDI and VE MRI data were acquired to study intraventricular dyssynchrony. RESULTS: Left ventricular dyssynchrony was not observed in normal individuals (mean dyssynchrony -2 +/- 15 ms on TDI; mean -5 +/- 17 ms on MRI, p = NS). In patients, mean LV dyssynchrony was 55 +/- 37 ms on TDI; 49 +/- 38 ms on MRI (p = NS). Good correlation between both modalities was observed (linear regression TDI = 0.99 x MRI - 5, n = 30, r = 0.98, p < 0.01). The MRI showed a small, nonsignificant underestimation of 5 +/- 8 ms compared with TDI. Agreement between MRI and TDI for classification according to severity of LV dyssynchrony (minimal, intermediate, and extensive) was excellent (kappa +/- SE = 0.96 +/- 0.07, p < 0.01) with 95% of patients classified identical. CONCLUSIONS: Both MRI and TDI yield comparable information on LV dyssynchrony; MRI is useful in the selection of patients for CRT.