Laparoscopic rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: a single-institution retrospective study evaluating surgical outcome

Background The laparoscopic approach promises to become the gold standard for the transabdominal management of full-thickness rectal prolapse. The aim of this study was to review our experience and to highlight the functional results achieved with this new technique.Methods Forty-eight patients with full-thickness external prolapse underwent laparoscopic repair between February 1997 and February 2003. All patients underwent preoperative evaluation of their rectal function. Patients with isolated rectal ulcer without prolapse or with internal prolapse and patients deemed by the anesthesiologist to be unfit for general anesthesia were excluded from the study. The laparoscopic technique was either a mesh rectopexy without resection (n = 35) or a suture rectopexy with sigmoid resection (n = 13). Patients with intractable constipation preceding the development of the rectal prolapse were advised to have a resection–rectopexy. In the postoperative follow-up, attention was paid to mortality, morbidity, recurrent prolapse, incontinence, and constipation. Follow-up was done by clinical review and postal questionnaire.Results There were no deaths and no septic or anastomotic complications. The postoperative morbidity rate was 5%. Oral intake was started on postoperative day 1. Discharge from the hospital was on postoperative day 4 in patients without sigmoid resection and on postoperative day 7 in patients with sigmoid resection. Two patients (4%) developed recurrent total prolapse during a median follow-up period of 36 ± 15 months (range, 7–77). The functional results were good or excellent in 72% of the cases, without digitations or dyschesia. Continence was improved in 31% of the patients and remains unchanged in 64% of them. In 11 patients (23%), constipation was worsened by the procedure.Conclusion Laparoscopic rectopexy with or without resection is both safe and effective. Advantages include low-morbidity, improved cosmesis, the rapid return of intestinal function, early discharge from hospital, and a low recurrence rate. The fecal continence score is improved; however, constipation is frequently worsened.This work is dedicated to the memory of Gerard Trebuchet, a highly influential French surgeon remembered for his implementation of several techniques for laparoscopic colon resection. Gerard Trebuchet died in Rennes, Frence, on 1 September 2003, at the age of 59 years.     

Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse: surgical technique

Technical features of laparoscopic rectopexy include complete rectal mobilization without division of the lateral stalks to avoid parasympathetic denervation and postoperative problems with defecation. Suture rectopexy is equally effective as posterior mesh rectopexy in preventing recurrences and eliminates the use of foreign material which is sometimes associated with intense fibrosis, sepsis and increased constipation. According to two randomised studies constipation seems to be less after resection rectopexy than suture or posterior mesh rectopexy alone perhaps by eliminating possible kinking at the rectosigmoid region by falling of the redundant sigmoid colon in the pouch of Douglas. Randomized studies are, however, needed to validate the need for colonic resection and to determine its optimal extent in patients who suffer from rectal prolapse, constipation and slow transit.     

Successful treatment of rectal prolapse by laparoscopic suture rectopexy

BACKGROUND: A wide variety of procedures are used for management of rectal prolapse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of laparoscopic suture rectopexy in the treatment of this condition. METHODS: From May 1991 to May 1998, 32 consecutive patients were treated by laparoscopic suture rectopexy. In four of them, an additional sigmoid colectomy was performed for refractory constipation or redundant large bowels. The clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: Of our 32 patients, 27 were female and five were male. The median age was 51.5 years (range, 20-87). The median operative time was 150 min (range, 90-300), and the median hospital stay was 5 days (range, 2-20). There were no operative mortalities. Three postoperative complications required reoperations for bowel obstructions. At a median follow-up of 33 months (range 3-78), there were two complete recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience indicates that laparoscopic suture rectopexy, with and without sigmoid colectomy, is safe, feasible, and effective for the treatment of rectal prolapse.     

Resection rectopexy for external rectal prolapse reduces constipation and anal incontinence.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The main aim was to examine constipation and anal incontinence in patients before and after resection for external rectal prolapse. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients had ligament preserving suture rectopexy and sigmoid resection (resection rectopexy) for external rectal prolapse by laparoscopic (n = 15) or open (n = 5) technique during 2001-2005. They were prospectively evaluated for constipation and anal incontinence using validated incontinence and KESS-constipation scores. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Constipation score was significantly reduced from mean 7.7 (5.4-9.9) to 4.5 (2.5-6.4) after median 4 months (1-19) and to 4.3 (2.2-6.3) after median 17 months (4-51). Six and four patients were constipated preoperatively and 17 months postoperatively, respectively. The four symptoms feeling incomplete evacuation of stool, minutes in lavatory per attempt, use of enemas/digitation and painful evacuation effort were significantly reduced, whilst stool consistency increased. Fourteen patients (70%) had anal incontinence. Corresponding and significant reduction in their scores were from mean 12.5 (9.4-15.5) to 5.1 (2.1-8.1) and to 3.6 (1.3-5.9). Incontinence was improved in 13 and unaltered in one patient(s). Two patients with worse outcome had increased stool consistency and constipation scores. Resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse reduced anal incontinence and constipation.     

Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse

Background: There have been few large series that have focused on the feasibility of the laparoscopic approach for rectal prolapse. This single-institution study prospectively examines the surgical outcome and changes in symptoms and bowel function following the laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse. Methods: In a selected group of 34 patients (total prolapse, 28; intussusception, six), 17 patients underwent laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy and 17 patients received a laparoscopic sutured rectopexy. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation at 3, 6, and 12 months included assessment of the severity of anal incontinence, constipation, changes in constipation-related symptoms, and colonic transit time. Results: Median operation time was 255 min (range, 180–360) in the resection rectopexy group and 150 min (range, 90–295) in the rectopexy alone group. Median postoperative hospital stay was 5 days (range, 3–15) and median time off work was 14 days (range, 12–21) in both groups. There were no deaths. Postoperative morbidity was 24%. Incontinence improved significantly regardless of which method was used. The main determinant of constipation was excessive straining at defecation. Constipation was cured in 70% of the patients in the rectopexy group and 64% in the resection rectopexy group. Symptoms of difficult evacuation improved, but the changes were significant only after resection rectopexy. Two patients (7%) developed recurrent total prolapse during a median follow-up of 2 years (range 12–60 months). Conclusions: Laparoscopic-sutured rectopexy and laparoscopic-assisted resection rectopexy are feasible and carry an acceptable morbidity rate. They eliminate prolapse and cure incontinence in the great majority of patients. Constipation and symptoms of difficult evacuation are alleviated. Received: 30 April 1999/Accepted: 8 July 1999/Online publication: 22 May 2000     

Prosthetic rectopexy to the pelvic floor and sigmoidectomy for rectal prolapse.

BACKGROUND: Full thickness rectal prolapse in young adults with normal pelvic floor is a disease in which the rectum is exceedingly long and mobile. Surgical treatment should correct both anatomical defects by combined rectopexy and colonic resection, which is expected to be less constipating than rectopexy alone. The aim of this study was to describe an original procedure of rectopexy to the pelvic floor with prosthetic material combined with sigmoid resection, and to evaluate prospectively anatomical and functional results. METHODS: Thirty-five patients (30 women) of median age 44 years (range 18 to 74) were operated on for full thickness rectal prolapse with normal pelvic floor. The rectum was mobilized posteriorly without division of the lateral ligaments and attached to the pelvic floor previously repaired with a nonabsorbable mesh. The sigmoid colon was resected with hand-sewn anastomosis. Clinical results were assessed by a questionnaire. RESULTS: There were no deaths or any septic or anastomotic complications. Small bowel obstruction was corrected laparoscopically in 1 patient. Mean hospital stay was 8 days (range 6 to 14). Mean follow-up was 34 months (range 10 to 93). No recurrence was seen. Preoperatively, 33 patients (94%) complained of constipation mainly with emptying problems (21 patients) and 25 patients (71.5%) were incontinent. Postoperatively, no constipated or incontinent patient's condition worsened. Rectal emptying was restored in 17 patients (81%). Eighteen incontinent patients (72%) regained full continence. On the other hand, 2 patients with normal bowel function worsened and 1 patient with an altered rectal compliance after Delorme's operation became incontinent. CONCLUSIONS: In young adults with rectal prolapse and normal pelvic floor undergoing prosthetic rectopexy and sigmoid resection (a) morbidity was low, (b) anatomical control was obtained in all cases, (c) emptying problems were corrected, and (d) deleterious effects are likely to occur if they had no constipation before operation or if rectal compliance was previously altered.     

Early outcomes of laparoscopic procedures performed on military personnel with total rectal prolapse and follow-up

Total rectal prolapse is a disorder frequently associated with constipation and anal incontinence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of the complications, pain management, hospital stay, constipation, and anal functions of the patients undergoing 2 types of laparoscopic surgical approaches. In this study, 33 patients underwent either laparoscopic rectopexy or hand-assisted laparoscopic resection rectopexy. Preoperative colonic transit time, defecation, postoperative pain scoring, pre-postoperative evaluation of the anal function, and the changes in constipation and relating symptoms were assessed. Postoperative evaluation had been performed at the sixth week and the twelfth month. Median operation time was 137 minutes for rectopexy and 230 minutes for resection rectopexy group. Median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days for patients with rectopexy and 7 days for patients with resection rectopexy. Patients needed painkillers in short postoperative period for pain management in both groups. Continence was improved in 11 of 13 patients (84.6%) in a year after laparoscopic surgery. In 15 patients (45.5%), preoperative constipation either remained in the same or became worse in 7 (21.1%) in a year after surgery. No patient developed recurrence in the median follow-up period, which was about 15 months. Laparoscopic rectopexy and resection rectopexy in the young aged patients working the Army are carried out with less morbidity rate. We eliminated the total prolapse and cure incontinence in almost all patients. In addition to constipation was reduced by laparoscopic surgical approaches in a short time hospitalization with short time painkiller need.     

Gastroenterological options in faecal incontinence.

Faecal incontinence may be due to a trauma, a rectal prolapse, or a neurological disorder. Obstetric trauma: If the sphincter has been severed, direct repair is indicated. In the case of neurological damage, plication of the levators can provide significant improvement; while the post-anal repair has become popular, anterior sphincter plication and levatorplasty, provide equivalent results. Rectal prolapse: Full thickness rectal prolapse is frequently associated with incontinence. Two categories of operations have been described: local operative procedures (Delorme's plicature, perineal resection) provide poor results in term of restoration of continence and should be reserved to unfit and elderly patients; abdominal operations combine an extensive rectal mobilisation and they differ by the type of fixation. The Ripstein operation (fixation to the promontory by an encircling sling of non absorbable mesh) has long been popular in the United States, but is followed by severe constipation. In the simple suture rectopexy, the rectum is fixed to the pelvic floor and the presacral fascia by non absorbable procedures. In the Ivalon sponge rectoprexy, a polyvinyl alcohol mesh in secured between the sacrum and the rectum, and provides a dense fibrous reaction. In the antero-posterior Marlex rectopexy, a sheet of Marlex mesh is fixed posteriorly to the rectum, and a sling is interposed anteriorly in order to support the anterior wall. In the resection rectopexy, a sigmoid resection in added to the rectal fixation in order to suppress the redundant sigmoid which is responsible for the constipation frequently following rectopexy. Results of abdominal rectopexy are satisfactory in terms of recurrence and restoration of continence.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse

BACKGROUND: Postoperative constipation is a common problem with most mesh suspension techniques used to correct rectal prolapse. Autonomic denervation of the rectum subsequent to its complete mobilization has been suggested as a contributory factor. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of patients who underwent a novel, autonomic nerve-sparing, laparoscopic technique for rectal prolapse. METHODS: Between 1995 and 1999, 42 patients had laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. The long-term results after a median follow-up of 61 (range 29-98) months were analysed. RESULTS: There were no major postoperative complications. Late recurrence occurred in two patients. In 28 of 31 patients with incontinence there was a significant improvement in continence. Symptoms of obstructed defaecation resolved in 16 of 19 patients. During follow-up, new onset of mild obstructed defaecation was noted in only two patients. Symptoms suggestive of slow-transit colonic obstipation were not induced. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is an effective technique for the correction of rectal prolapse and appears to avoid severe postoperative constipation. The ventral position of the prosthesis may explain the beneficial effect on symptoms of obstructed defaecation.     

腹腔镜直肠缝线固定术:一种治疗完全性直肠脱垂的简便有效术式

【摘要】〓目的〓探讨腹腔镜直肠缝线固定术治疗完全性直肠脱垂的临床效果。方法〓对我院2010年1月至2014年1月采用腹腔镜直肠缝线固定术治疗的36例完全性直肠脱垂病例进行观察,并与同期采用腹腔镜直肠补片固定术治疗的16例同病种病例进行对照。结果〓采用直肠缝线固定术的平均手术时间明显短于直肠补片固定术(110±13 min vs 120±9 min,P<0.05),而且住院费用也较低(16227±845元 vs 19143±1163元,P<0.05)。两组在平均术中出血量、平均术后肛门恢复排气时间、平均术后住院时间方面相比均无统计学差异。两组患者均无术后早期并发症。中位随访时间26个月,两组患者在术后1月和术后1年的直肠脱垂复发率、Wexner便秘评分、胃肠生活质量指标GIQLI均无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论〓腹腔镜直肠缝线固定术对治疗完全性直肠脱垂具有手术创伤小、恢复快、住院时间短、费用低等优点,而近期和远期随访均具有满意的效果。     

Laparoscopic therapy of chronic constipation]

Chronic constipation is a common complaint. Clinical presentation varies with each individual. This study reports the results of laparoscopic therapy in 92 patients with chronic constipation. In two patients conversion was necessary. The majority of patients were female (n = 84, 93.3%). Mean age was 60.3 years (+/- 15.7). In three patients with slow-transit constipation a laparoscopic assisted subtotal colectomy was performed. In patients with outlet obstruction a laparoscopic assisted sigmoid resection was carried out, whereas in 79 a rectopexy with reconstruction of the pouch of douglas was added. In 6 of 8 patients with concomitting diverticulitis an anterior resection was necessary. Mean stay on ICU was 0.5 days. OR time ranged from 100 up to 490 minutes. In 21 patients (23.4%) postoperative complications were observed; however only in 7.8% (n = 7) this lead to additional surgical intervention. The postoperative follow-up is 24 months (6-52 mon). In 76.3% of patients with outlet obstruction and rectal prolapse chronic constipation postoperatively improved or patients felt "symptomfree". In patients with outlet obstruction but without rectal prolapse constipation postoperatively was better in 75.8%. After subtotal colectomy 2 of 3 patients (66%) felt cured after surgery. Careful patients selection by thorough preoperative physiologic testing is mandatory for successful outcome in surgery of chronic constipation. Based on this by laparoscopic surgery same functional results as with conventional open technique could be achieved.     

Laparoscopic rectopexy without resection: a worthwhile treatment for rectal prolapse in patients without prior constipation

Anterior resection with rectopexy is considered by many to be the best operation for rectal prolapse. It is feared that if sigmoid redundancy created by rectal mobilization is not resected, colonic motility (specifically constipation) could be disabling. We contend that resection is not necessary in patients without preexisting constipation. We tested this hypothesis using a laparoscopic approach to minimize hospital stay. Twelve patients were treated (eight women); mean age was 45 years (range, 25-82 years). No patient had preexisting constipation; one had irritable bowel syndrome. Three patients had prior prolapse operations. Full rectal mobilization was undertaken down to the levator hiatus; neither the mesenteric vessels nor the lateral ligaments were divided. Rectopexy to the presacral fascia was done with one to two Nurolon sutures on either side of the rectum. There were no complications; mean hospital stay was 4 days. Mean follow up was 32 months (range; 3-75 months); there have been no recurrences. Only the patient with irritable bowel syndrome developed significant constipation. We conclude: 1) rectopexy can be safely done laparoscopically, 2) resection is not required in the absence of prior constipation, and 3) rectal mobilization and rectopexy does not predispose to future constipation in these selected patients.     

腹腔镜直肠悬吊固定术治疗直肠重度脱垂

目的探讨腹腔镜直肠悬吊固定术治疗直肠脱垂的临床应用价值。方法1998年3月至2007年2月,对4例完全性直肠脱垂患者进行了腹腔镜直肠悬吊固定术。1例采用缝合固定法,将直肠后壁分离、提高,用丝线缝闭直肠前陷凹,并将直肠后壁悬吊固定于骶骨岬前筋膜上,再将乙状结肠缝合固定在左侧腰大肌筋膜。3例采用网片固定法,将直肠游离到肛提肌水平,用1张6cm×9cm的T字型聚丙烯网片置于直肠后方,网片下缘在肛提肌水平环绕直肠,在直肠前方用丝线缝合网片和直肠浆肌层,再将网片上端在直肠后用疝修补钉夹固定于骶骨岬前筋膜,缝合关闭盆底腹膜。再将乙状结肠缝合固定在左侧腰大肌筋膜。结果4例患者手术均顺利,无中转开腹者。手术时间92.5(80-100)min,出血量6.5(5～10)ml。无并发症发生。术后尿失禁和肛门失禁的症状缓解,术后随访2个月至3年均未见复发与便秘出现。结论腹腔镜下行腹腔镜直肠悬吊固定术创伤小、恢复快和安全有效。     

Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for complex rectocele

Aim Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, previously described for external rectal prolapse, was evaluated for symptomatic complex rectocoele. Method From January 2004 to December 2008, 84 (50.9%) patients (mean age 64 ± 5 years) underwent laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for symptomatic complex rectocoele, confirmed preoperatively on dynamic defaecography, with 26 (31%) patients having a concurrent cystocoele. The operative technique was standardized, and those with cystocoele underwent bladder mesh suspension during the same procedure. Prospectively collected data were analysed for preoperative symptoms, operative and functional results [constipation, faecal incontinence (FI), dyspareunia and satisfaction score]. Results The conversion rate was 3.6% and perioperative morbidity 4.8% with no mortality. At a median follow up of 29 (4–59) months, there was a significant decrease in vaginal discomfort (86–20%) and obstructed defaecation symptoms (83–46%), P < 0.001. There was no significant change in FI (20–16%), no worsening of preoperative symptoms or new complaints of constipation, dyspareunia or FI. Overall, 88% of patients reported an improvement in overall well‐being. Conclusion Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy is a safe and effective method for treating symptomatic complex rectocoele.     

Laparoscopic management of persistent complete rectal prolapse in children

Background

Rectal prolapse is a relatively common condition in children. The multiplicity of surgical approaches used for rectal prolapse indicates that there is no single approach universally accepted and applicable to all cases. The laparoscopic approach promises to become the criterion standard for the management of full-thickness rectal prolapse in children. The aim of this study was to review our experience over the last 5 years and to evaluate the results that can be achieved by using laparoscopy in management of complete rectal prolapse in children.

Patients and Methods

Forty patients presented with complete rectal prolapse and fecal incontinence grades (3-4) according to Rintala scale (37 secondary to prolapse and 3 neuropathic) had been operated upon laparoscopically from August 2003 to August 2008. They were subjected to clinical examination, investigations, pre- and postoperative electromyogram activities for external sphincter, puborectalis, and pelvic floor muscles. The pathophysiologic changes for each case was identified and dealt with laparoscopically (laparoscopic suture rectopexy, laparoscopic mesh rectopexy, laparoscopic resection rectopexy, and laparoscopic levatorplasty).

Results

Among the 40 children with complete rectal prolapse, 22 were males and 18 females. Their median age was 9 years (range, 4-14 years). All cases (n = 40) showed a redundant rectosigmoid junction. Additional laxity of the pelvic floor was present in 32, rectoanal intussusception in 27, anterior wall rectoanal intussusception in 3, and rectosacral hernia in 5 cases. All procedures were completed laparoscopically. The median duration of surgery was 60 minutes (range, 50-70 minutes) for suture rectopexy, 90 minutes (range, 60-110 minutes) for mesh rectopexy, 110 minutes (range, 95-160 minutes) for resection rectopexy, and 120 minutes (range, 100-150 minutes) for laparoscopic levatorplasty. No intraoperative complications occurred in this study. Median postoperative hospitalization was 3 days (range, 2-5 days). Electromyogram studies showed statistically significant improvement during rest, minimal volition, and squeezing in all cases except those children with spina bifida and meningomyelocele. The only complications were postoperative constipation and external colonic fistula. Significant improvement of the continence score was achieved in all cases. The average follow-up time was 36 months. There were no recurrences.

Conclusion

The use of laparoscopy in the management of complete rectal prolapse is safe, effective, and associated with improved functional outcome. It saved the patients multiple operations and is associated with minimal postoperative pain and short hospital stay.     

Rectal prolapse in adults--causes, diagnostic, treatment

Despite progress in modern surgery, the choice of the surgical procedure of rectal prolapse is regarded with controversy. Selection criteria between the abdominal or perineal approach or between rectopexy and resection rectopexy are not yet proven. This article gives a review of the literature about rectal prolapse and an analysis of the outcome of posterior rectopexy and resection rectopexy--partly conventionally and partly laparoscopically--in 25 patients with rectal prolapse III degrees and IV degrees. All except for one patient were examined during a mean follow-up of 5.5 (3.1) years for the rectopexy group and 2.1 (0.7) years for the resection rectopexy group. Recurrence occurred in one patient in each group respectively. There was no significant difference concerning the continence function (p = 0.32) and constipation (p = 0.36) between both groups. No mesh-related complications such as infection, fistula or rectum stenosis were observed. According to the review of the literature and our data, we believe that the choice of the operative procedure for rectal prolapse should be based on individual criteria. Fit patients should be offered laparoscopic procedures such as resection rectopexy and rectopexy without colonic resection.     

Robotic assisted rectopexy

BACKGROUND: During the last 3 years, robotic surgery has had a considerable impact on minimally invasive surgery in a wide range of specialties. This study describes the surgical technique and preliminary results of our first 6 cases of robotic assisted suture rectopexy. METHODS: During a period of 13 months 6 patients with full thickness rectal prolapse were operated on with the da Vinci surgical system. All patients were considered suitable for a suture rectopexy. Setting-up time, procedure time, patient recovery, and hospital stay were recorded and compared with the current literature. RESULTS: All operations were completed successfully using the robotic system. There were no major complications and no deaths. Mean setting-up time was 28 minutes, mean operation time was 127 minutes, and mean hospital stay was 6 days. At 3 to 6 months of follow-up all patients are in good health, with no signs of recurrence and no reports of constipation. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic assisted suture rectopexy is feasible and safe and apparently meets accepted standards of laparoscopic surgery.     

Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques.

To compare the methods of abdominal rectopexy and to elucidate the mechanism by which rectopexy restores continence in patients with rectal prolapse, the role of sphincter recovery, rectal morphological changes and improved rectal sensation were assessed in 68 patients (eight men, 60 women) of median age 63 (range 18-83) years undergoing resection rectopexy (n = 29), anterior and posterior Marlex rectopexy (n = 20), posterior Ivalon rectopexy (n = 9) or suture rectopexy (n = 10). Preoperative and postoperative manometry, radiology and electrosensitivity measurements were made. Age and duration of follow-up were similar in all groups and the prolapse was controlled in all patients. Significantly improved continence was seen in all but the Ivalon group. There was no evidence of increasing postoperative constipation. Sphincter length and voluntary contraction were unaltered, but improved resting tone was seen in the resection and suture groups. This was not seen in the prosthetic groups. Improved continence correlated with recovery of resting pressure. Upper and sensation was improved in all groups. Radiological changes did not correlate with improved continence. We conclude that continence is improved by all rectopexy procedures but seems better without prosthetic material. Sphincter recovery seems to be the most important factor.     

Traitement du prolapsus rectal complet par rectopexie au plancher pelvien avec prothèse et résection du sigmoïde. Résultats anatomocliniques d'une étude prospective

Background, aim of the studyFull thickness rectal prolapse in young adults with normal perineal structures is a disease of the rectum which is exceedingly long and mobile. Surgical treatment should correct both anatomical defects by combined rectopexy and colonic resection, expected to be less constipating than rectopexy alone. The aim of this study was to describe an original procedure of rectopexy to the pelvic floor with prosthetic material combined with sigmoid resection, and to evaluate prospectively anatomical and functional results.Patients and methodsTwenty patients (16 women and four men) of median age 41 years were operated on for full thickness rectal prolapse with normal perineal structures. The rectum was mobilised posteriorly without division of the lateral ligaments and attached to the pelvic floor previously repaired, with a semi-absorbable prosthesis. The sigmoid colon was resected with hand-sewn anastomosis. Clinical results were assessed by a questionnaire.ResultsThere were no deaths or any septic or anastomotic complications. Small bowel obstruction was corrected laparoscopically in one patient. Mean hospital stay was 8.7 days. Mean follow up was 30 (range 9–75) months. No recurrence was seen. Pre-operatively, 18 patients (90%) complained of constipation mainly with emptying problems (15 patients) and 13 patients (65%) were incontinent. Post-operatively, no constipated or incontinent patient's condition worsened. Rectal emptying was restored in 13 patients (86.5%). Eight incontinent patients (61.5%) regained full continence. On the other hand, two patients with normal bowel function worsened and one patient with an altered rectal compliance after Delorme's operation became incontinent.ConclusionsIn young adults with rectal prolapse and normal perineal structures undergoing prosthetic rectopexy and sigmoid resection: a) morbidity was low, b) anatomical control was obtained in all cases, c) emptying problems were corrected, d) deleterious effects are likely to occur if they had no constipation before operation or if rectal compliance was previously altered.     

Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Total Rectal Prolapse

Purpose Total rectal prolapse is a devastating disorder causing constipation and anal incontinence. We compared open and laparoscopic surgical approaches in a limited series.Methods The subjects of this study were 23 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures (LP group) and 17 patients who underwent open procedures (OP group) for rectal prolapse. We assessed the preoperative colonic transit time, postoperative pain scoring, pre- and postoperative anal functions, and changes in constipation and related symptoms.Results The median operation time was 140.8min for the LP group and 113.1min for the OP group (P = 0.037). The median postoperative hospital stay was 4.8 days after the LPs and 9.6 days after the OPs (P = 0.001). Less analgesia was needed in the early postoperative period after the LPs (P = 0.007). While more than 70% improvement in continence was seen in the patients who underwent OPs, it was about 85% in those who underwent LPs. Improvement in constipation and related symptoms were similar in both groups. More than 30% of patients still suffered from hard stools and other symptoms of constipation. The colonic transit times were reduced in about 50% of patients who had suffered constipation in both groups. There was no incidence of recurrence in the median follow-up period.Conclusion Although transabdominal rectopexy has been performed conventionally for rectal prolapse for many years, laparoscopic rectopexy and laparoscopic resection rectopexy are associated with lower morbidity and less postoperative pain. We eliminated the total prolapse and cured incontinence in almost all patients, with a short hospital stay.