Recombinant zoster vaccine coverage in the United States: An analysis of claims-based data

Recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) is recommended for individuals ≥ 50 years of age for protection against herpes zoster (HZ). This study quantifies RZV coverage and assesses predictors for RZV vaccination using a U.S. claims database. Univariate linear regression provided annual prevalence of RZV vaccination and multivariable logistic regression provided ORs and 95% CIs for associations between predictors and RZV vaccination. A total of 4,124,315 individuals (19,080,914 person-years) were included in this study. Since receiving FDA approval for the prevention of HZ, RZV coverage (of at least one dose) has reached approximately 17% within the eligible U.S. population by January 2021, although significant disparities between demographic groups were noted. Our findings suggest that HZ vaccine coverage may be reduced below goal in the U.S. and highlights the importance of continuing to monitor RZV vaccination. Additionally, as our study found disparities in vaccine coverage, attention towards marginalized and medically underserved populations is needed.     

Predictors of herpes zoster vaccination among Australian adults aged 65 and over

Objective(s)To estimate HZ vaccine coverage in Australia among older Australians and to identify potential barriers to vaccination.DesignAnalysis of data from three cross-sectional surveys administered online between 2019 and 2020.Setting and participantsAdults aged 65 and over residing in Australia.Main outcome measuresSelf-reported herpes zoster vaccination.ResultsAmong the 744 adults aged 65 and over in this sample, 32% reported being vaccinated for HZ, including 23% of participants aged 65–74, 55% of participants aged 75–84, and 0% for participants aged 85 and above. Those who are vaccinated with other immunisations are more likely to have received HZ vaccine, including seasonal influenza (OR = 4.41, 95 % CI: 2.44–7.98) and pneumococcal vaccines (OR = 4.43, 95 % CI: 2.92 – 6.75). Participants with a history of certain conditions, such as stroke (OR = 2.26, 95 % CI: 1.13–4.49), were more likely to be vaccinated against HZ. Participants that reported smoking tobacco daily were less likely to be vaccinated against HZ (OR = 0.48, 95 % CI: 0.26–0.89). Participants were less likely to be vaccinated against HZ if they preferred to develop immunity ‘naturally’ (OR = 0.29, 95 % CI: 0.15 – 0.57) or expressed distrust of vaccines (OR = 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.13–0.91).Conclusion(s)Further research is required to understand the barriers to HZ vaccine uptake. Increasing the funding eligibility for those who are at risk of complications from shingles, or lowering the age of eligibility, may increase vaccine coverage.     

Shingles vaccination uptake in Massachusetts adults aged 50 years and older

BackgroundShingles (herpes zoster), a medical condition caused by reactivation of latent varicella zoster virus and characterized by painful rash, will affect almost one third of Americans during their lifetime. A licensed vaccine (zoster vaccine live [ZVL]) was recommended for individuals ≥ 60 years old in 2008 to reduce shingles incidence. The Healthy People (HP) 2020 target for shingles vaccination in ≥ 60 year-olds was 30%; in 2014, it stood at 31.8% and in 2017 at 34.9%. While the national coverage target is met, variability remains across age, gender and ethnicity. Understanding factors influencing patient acceptance of the shingles vaccination is needed to help guide program activities and improve vaccination coverage in the adult population.PurposeTo understand Massachusetts consumers’ knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and barriers to obtaining a shingles vaccination.MethodsWe performed a telephone survey using a stratified sample of Massachusetts residents ≥ 50 years-old who i) responded to the 2012 Massachusetts Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n = 10,822), ii) agreed to a follow-up survey (n = 6,873), and iii) reported awareness of the shingles vaccination (n = 1,000; n = 529 vaccinated respondents (VR) and n = 471 non-vaccinated respondents (NVR)). Multivariable logistic regression identified factors independently associated with receiving shingles vaccination.ResultsAcross both groups, most respondents (n = 989, 99%) were aware of shingles, perceived shingles as painful, and knew of others who had had shingles. Multivariable logistic regression indicated an association between shingles vaccination and physician recommendation, influenza vaccination, and perception of shingles risk.ConclusionsMore than half of the sub-sample reported not knowing about shingles vaccine, therefore, opportunities to increase awareness should be prioritized. Since provider recommendation and flu vaccination receipt had the greatest odds of increasing shingles vaccination, standard practice should include adding shingles to flu vaccine recommendations for age-eligible patients.     

Evaluation of the incidence of herpes zoster after concomitant administration of zoster vaccine and polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine

In 2009, a revision to the zoster vaccine package insert was approved stating that the zoster vaccine and the pneumococcal vaccine should not be given concurrently because concomitant use resulted in reduced immunogenicity of the zoster vaccine. We conducted an observational study to evaluate if concomitant vaccination reduces the protective effect of the zoster vaccine. The study was conducted in Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Incidence of herpes zoster (HZ) after vaccination with a zoster vaccine in the population receiving both vaccines on the same day was compared to that in the population receiving a pneumococcal vaccine within one year to 30 days prior to zoster vaccine. Vaccinations and incident HZ cases were identified by electronic health records. The hazard ratio for incident HZ associated with concomitant vs. nonconcomitant vaccination was estimated using the Cox proportional hazard model. There were 56 incident HZ cases in the concomitant vaccination cohort and 58 in the nonconcomitant vaccination cohort, yielding a HZ incidence of 4.54 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.43-5.89) and 4.51 (95% CI, 3.42-5.83) per 1000 person-years, respectively. The hazard ratio comparing the incidence rate of HZ in the two cohorts was 1.19 (95% CI, 0.81-1.74) in the adjusted analysis. In this study, we found no evidence of an increased risk of HZ in the population receiving zoster vaccine and pneumococcal vaccine concomitantly. The revision of the product information needs to be carefully assessed to avoid introducing barriers to patients and providers who are interested in these two important vaccines.     

Review of the United States universal varicella vaccination program: Herpes zoster incidence rates,cost-effectiveness,and vaccine efficacy based primarily on the Antelope Valley Varicella Active Surveillance Project data

In a cooperative agreement starting January 1995, prior to the FDA's licensure of the varicella vaccine on March 17, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded the Los Angeles Department of Health Services’ Antelope Valley Varicella Active Surveillance Project (AV-VASP). Since only varicella case reports were gathered, baseline incidence data for herpes zoster (HZ) or shingles was lacking. Varicella case reports decreased 72%, from 2834 in 1995 to 836 in 2000 at which time approximately 50% of children under 10 years of age had been vaccinated. Starting in 2000, HZ surveillance was added to the project. By 2002, notable increases in HZ incidence rates were reported among both children and adults with a prior history of natural varicella. However, CDC authorities still claimed that no increase in HZ had occurred in any US surveillance site. The basic assumptions inherent to the varicella cost–benefit analysis ignored the significance of exogenous boosting caused by those shedding wild-type VZV. Also ignored was the morbidity associated with even rare serious events following varicella vaccination as well as the morbidity from increasing cases of HZ among adults. Vaccine efficacy declined below 80% in 2001. By 2006, because 20% of vaccinees were experiencing breakthrough varicella and vaccine-induced protection was waning, the CDC recommended a booster dose for children and, in 2007, a shingles vaccination was approved for adults aged 60 years and older. In the prelicensure era, 95% of adults experienced natural chickenpox (usually as children)—these cases were usually benign and resulted in long-term immunity. Varicella vaccination is less effective than the natural immunity that existed in prevaccine communities. Universal varicella vaccination has not proven to be cost-effective as increased HZ morbidity has disproportionately offset cost savings associated with reductions in varicella disease. Universal varicella vaccination has failed to provide long-term protection from VZV disease.     

Effectiveness of the recombinant zoster vaccine among Kaiser Permanente Hawaii enrollees aged 50 and older: A retrospective cohort study

BackgroundThe incidence of herpes zoster (HZ) has been on the rise for decades in the United States. Clinical trials for the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) demonstrated vaccine efficacy of over 90% in preventing herpes zoster. However, there is limited information on its effectiveness outside of a clinical trial setting, as well as its effectiveness against herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO).MethodsA de-identified electronic health records database from Kaiser Permanente Hawaii (KPH) was used to conduct this retrospective cohort study to assess the effectiveness of the recombinant zoster vaccine against HZ and HZO in immunocompetent, vaccine age-eligible individuals without a prior history of HZ, who were continuously enrolled in KPH for ≥365 days prior to becoming age-eligible for RZV between January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2019.ResultsA total of 78 356 adults were included in this study, with 11 864 (15.1%) adults receiving two valid doses of the recombinant zoster vaccine. The incidence rate of HZ was 325.6 (95% CI: 217.7 to 464.4) cases per 100 000 person-years in vaccinated persons compared to 1063.3 cases per 100 000 person-years (95% CI: 1006.0 to 1122.8) in the unvaccinated group. The incidence rate of HZO was 11.9 (95% CI: 0.7 to 52.3) cases per 100 000 person-years in the vaccinated group compared to 72.1 (95% CI: 58.0 to 88.3) in the unvaccinated group. RZV was 83.5% (95% CI: 74.9% to 89.2%) effective against HZ and 93.3% (95% CI: 48.7% to 99.1%) effective against HZO.ConclusionsRZV has demonstrated high effectiveness against both HZ and HZO outside of a clinical trial setting in the United States. Vaccine coverage is low, emphasizing the need for public health efforts to increase vaccination to reduce morbidity from HZ and HZO.     

Herpes zoster vaccine coverage in Australia before and after introduction of a national vaccination program

BackgroundIn Australia, a herpes zoster (HZ) vaccination program targeting adults aged 70 years old with catch-up for those 71-79 years began in November 2016 but there is limited information on vaccine uptake and coverage achieved since commencement.MethodsWe used a national de-identified electronic primary care dataset, MedicineInsight, and extracted records from patients turning 50–90 years old during 2016–2018. Among patients considered regular attenders, with at least one visit per year in the two years prior, we estimated the crude and adjusted average monthly HZ vaccine uptake in the target population (70–79 years old) for each year since program implementation as well as cumulative vaccine coverage until December 2018. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyse characteristics associated with higher coverage.ResultsAmong 52,229, 55,034, and 57,316 regular attenders turning 70–79 years old in 2016, 2017 and 2018 respectively, the average monthly vaccine uptake rate was 5.5%, 3.3%, and 1.6% respectively. Up to 31st December 2018, the estimated cumulative vaccine coverage in regularly attending adults was 46.9% (25,791/55,034). It was substantially lower at 41.6% (27,040/65,010) using an alternate definition of a regular attender. Vaccine coverage differed by sex (women: 48.5% versus men: 45.1%, adjusted OR = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.1–1.2); by jurisdiction (compared to New South Wales: 43.7%, South Australia: 55.6%, aOR = 1.6, 95% CI (1.5–1.8); Northern Territory: 27.6%, aOR = 0.6, (0.5–0.7)); by remoteness status (compared to major cities: 47.6%, remote/very remote areas: 38.2%, aOR = 0.7, (0.6–0.8)); and by socioeconomic disadvantage (compared to most disadvantaged: 41.8%, most advantaged: 48.6%, aOR = 1.6 (1.2–2.1)).ConclusionsOur estimates of HZ vaccine coverage are substantially higher than the only other reports based on the Australian Immunisation Register however they still suggest that uptake is suboptimal. The use of electronic medical records can complement other data for estimating vaccine coverage in Australian adults.     

Hepatitis B vaccination coverage among high-risk adults 18-49 years, U.S., 2009

Background

Approximately 43,000 new hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections occurred in 2007. Although hepB vaccination has been recommended for adults at high-risk for incident HBV infection for many years, coverage remains low.

Methods

We used the 2009 National Health Interview Survey to assess self-reported HepB vaccine uptake (≥1 dose), series completion (≥3 dose), and independent predictors of vaccination among high-risk adults aged 18-49 years. High-risk adults were defined as those reporting male sex with men; injection drug use; hemophilia with receipt of clotting factors; sexually transmitted disease in prior five years; sex for money or drugs; HIV positive; sex with persons having any above risk factors; or who “felt they were at high risk for HIV”. Persons with none of the aforementioned risk factors were considered non-high risk. Bivariate analysis was conducted to assess vaccination coverage. Independent predictors of vaccine uptake and series completion were determined using a logistic regression.

Results

Overall, 7.0% adults aged 18-49 years had high-risk behaviors. Unadjusted coverage with ≥1 dose was 50.5% among high-risk compared to 40.5% among non-high-risk adults (p-values <0.001) while series completion (≥3 doses) was 41.8% and 34.2%, respectively (p-values <0.001). On multivariable analysis, ≥1 dose coverage, but not series completion, was higher (Risk Ratio 1.1, 95% CI = 1.0-1.2, p-value = 0.021) among high-risk compared to non-high risk adults. Other characteristics independently associated with a higher likelihood of HepB vaccination among persons 18-49 years included younger age groups, females, higher education, ≥2 physician contacts in the past year, ever tested for HIV, health care personnel, received influenza vaccination in the previous year, and ever received hepatitis A vaccination. Vaccine uptake with ≥1 dose increased by 5.1% (p = 0.047) among high-risk adults between 2004 and 2009.

Conclusions

A small increase in ≥1 dose HepB vaccination coverage among high-risk adults compared with non-high risk adults was documented for the first time in 2009. Higher coverage among persons 18-30 years may reflect aging of persons vaccinated when they were children and adolescents. To improve protection against hepatitis B among high-risk adults, healthcare providers should offer hepatitis B vaccination to persons at high risk and those who seek vaccination to protect themselves and facilitate timely completion of the three (3) dose HepB series.     

Safety of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine in adults aged 50 years or older. A phase IIIB,non-randomized,multinational, open-label study in previous ZOE-50 and ZOE-70 placebo recipients

BackgroundEfficacy of the adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) against herpes zoster (HZ) was demonstrated in pivotal trials ZOE-50 (NCT01165177) and ZOE-70 (NCT01165229). This study was designed to offer RZV to placebo recipients of these parent studies.MethodsVaccine safety and suspected HZ episode occurrence were assessed for 12 months following vaccination.ResultsOf the 14,550 eligible participants, 8687 received RZV and 97.8% completed the 2-dose schedule. During the 30-day post-vaccination period, 5175 (59.6%) participants experienced ≥ 1 unsolicited adverse event (AE), 4422 (50.9%) were vaccination-related. The most common AEs were injection-site reactions, pyrexia, and headache. During the study, 734 (8.4%) participants reported ≥ 1 serious AE (SAE) and 62 (0.7%) reported ≥ 1 potential immune-mediated disease (pIMD); 2 of each were assessed as vaccination-related. Suspected HZ episodes were reported by 30 participants (0.3%).ConclusionsNature and incidence of AEs, SAEs, and pIMDs were as expected and in line with the parent studies.     

Adherence with and completion of recommended hepatitis vaccination schedules among adults in the United States

IntroductionAdult vaccination coverage rates in the US are well below national targets, leaving many adults at increased risk. Additionally, typical vaccination coverage calculations do not adequately approximate population immunity as they do not consider whether multidose vaccines were administered within the recommended schedules. As timely administration of each dose optimizes overall vaccine effectiveness, we sought to document adherence to and completion of the hepatitis A (HepA), hepatitis B (HepB), and combined hepatitis A and hepatitis B (HepA-HepB) multidose vaccine schedule in an insured adult population in the US.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective database study of administrative claims from 2008 to 2015 (analyzed in 2017). Completion of 2 (HepA) and 3 doses (HepB and HepA-HepB), and adherence to the 2- and 3-dose recommended schedules were measured among individuals aged 19 years and older at first dose. The proportion of patients who completed 2 and 3 doses and were adherent to the recommended schedule were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.ResultsFor HepA, 27.14% of initiating adults were adherent to the recommended schedule, and 32.05% had received a second dose by 42 months. Approximately one-third of adults who initiated the HepB or HepA-HepB series completed all 3 doses within 2 years of the minimum spacing (31.17% and 32.27%, respectively). Generally, completion and adherence were highest in individuals aged 60–64 years at the time of initiation.ConclusionsHepatitis vaccine adherence and completion in adults is suboptimal. As a result, the majority of adults initiating each series may not be receiving the full protective benefit of these multidose vaccines.     

Ten years of experience with herpes zoster vaccine in primary care- how attitudes and practices have changed and what it may mean for a new zoster vaccine

Zoster vaccine live (ZVL [Zostavax]) has been recommended for the prevention of herpes zoster (HZ) among immunocompetent adults ≥60 years in the United States since 2008. To examine changes in healthcare providers’ perceptions and practices related to HZ disease and vaccination, we administered surveys to national networks of primary care physicians in 2005, 2008, and 2016. Ten years after ZVL was first licensed, physicians were more likely to respond that they perceived HZ as a serious disease and more strongly recommended ZVL, and were less likely to report less likely to report several major barriers to HZ vaccination such as patient cost, vaccine effectiveness and competing medical concerns. Overall, physician attitudes appear to be more favorable towards zoster vaccination after a decade of availability of a HZ vaccine. The new recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV [Shingrix]) may benefit from physician’s increased perception of the importance of HZ and HZ vaccination.     

Completion of the two-dose recombinant zoster vaccine series in adults 50 years and older

BackgroundIn 2017, a new adjuvanted recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) was recommended for adults ≥50 years as two-dose series 2–6 months apart. We evaluated two-dose RZV completion and factors associated with completion.MethodsThe study included Kaiser Permanente Southern California members ≥50 years who received an RZV dose during April-November 2018 and had continuous membership 12 months before to 9 months after the first RZV dose. Completion was defined as receipt of the second dose ≥4 weeks to 9 months after the first dose (allowing 3-month grace period). Characteristics including age, sex, race/ethnicity, Medicaid status, neighborhood level income and education, comorbidities, history of zoster, health care utilization before and after the first dose, receipt of influenza vaccine, vaccination month (supply shortage proxy), concomitant vaccine, medical center, and medically attended reactions, pain, or gout after the first dose were compared between completers and non-completers. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for factors associated with completion were estimated by multivariable logistic regression.ResultsAmong 31,120 first dose recipients, 67.2% completed the series within 9 months. In adjusted analyses, higher completion was associated with White compared with Black or Hispanic race/ethnicity, higher neighborhood income and education, no chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes, or dementia, more outpatient visits and fewer emergency department visits before or after the first dose, no hospitalizations after the first dose, receipt of influenza vaccine, receipt of the first dose in June-November rather than April-May 2018, and no concomitant vaccine with the first dose. Systemic reactions or pain after the first dose was not associated with completion.ConclusionCompletion of RZV series appears suboptimal in the early phase of implementation. Despite similar accessibility in a health care system, completion varied by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, health status, and care seeking behavior, suggesting areas to target for improvement.     

我国部分地区城市居民带状疱疹疫苗的认知、态度和接种行为研究

目的了解我国≥25岁的城市居民对带状疱疹及其疫苗的认知、态度以及接种现状。方法 2022年8-10月采用方便抽样的方法调查9个城市36家社区卫生服务中心≥25岁的就诊居民。采用问卷调查法收集居民基本信息、对带状疱疹及其疫苗的认知和态度以及接种情况和未接种原因。结果共有2 864名城市居民纳入研究。调查对象对带状疱疹及其疫苗的认知总得分为(3.01±2.08)分, 态度总得分为(18.25±2.76)分。其中男性(β=-0.45, P<0.001)、年龄40～59岁(β=-0.34, P=0.023)或≥60岁(β=-0.68, P<0.001)、已婚(β=-0.69, P=0.002)与认知得分负相关;文化程度为高中/中专(β=0.44, P=0.036)、大专(β=0.65, P=0.006)、本科及以上(β=1.20, P<0.001)、2021年家庭年收入≥120 000元(β=0.42, P=0.020)、拥有城镇职工医保(β=0.62, P=0.030)、公费医疗或商业医保(β=0.65, P=0.033)、有过水痘患病史(β=0.29, P=0.025)与...     

带状疱疹疫苗的研究成果及其在老年人中的使用

带状疱疹（HZ）是由水痘-带状疱疹病毒（varicella-zoster virus,VZV）复发感染所致,患者多见于老年人以及免疫低下人群。疫苗在控制HZ方面有着重要作用。该文对近年来国内外有关HZ疫苗的研究成果及使用情况进行综述,为疫苗的使用及带状疱疹的预防提供参考。     

Herpes zoster burden of illness and health care resource utilisation in the Australian population aged 50 years and older

Incidence of zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN) and associated health care resource utilisation were investigated in the Australian population aged ≥50 years, using general practice data from 2000 to 2006, and pharmaceutical prescribing, hospital morbidity and emergency department data from 1998 to 2005. Zoster and PHN incidence rates were estimated as ∼10/1000 and 1.45/1000 persons, respectively, with antivirals prescribed for 73.5% of zoster cases. Estimated hospitalisation and emergency department visit rates were 0.67/1000 and 0.38/1000 persons, respectively. Management of zoster (including PHN) involved ∼2.4 general practitioner consultations. Total costs to the health care system were estimated as ∼32.8 million per year. The substantial burden of zoster and PHN highlights the potential benefit of zoster vaccination.     

The cost-effectiveness of varicella and combined varicella and herpes zoster vaccination programmes in the United Kingdom

Background

Despite the existence of varicella vaccine, many developed countries have not introduced it into their national schedules, partly because of concerns about whether herpes zoster (HZ, shingles) will increase due to a lack of exogenous boosting. The magnitude of any increase in zoster that might occur is dependent on rates at which adults and children mix - something that has only recently been quantified - and could be reduced by simultaneously vaccinating older individuals against shingles. This study is the first to assess the cost-effectiveness of combined varicella and zoster vaccination options and compare this to alternative programmes.

Methods and findings

The cost-effectiveness of various options for the use of varicella-zoster virus (VZV) containing vaccines was explored using a transmission dynamic model. Underlying contact rates are estimated from a contemporary survey of social mixing patterns, and uncertainty in these derived from bootstrapping the original sample. The model was calibrated to UK data on varicella and zoster incidence. Other parameters were taken from the literature. UK guidance on perspective and discount rates were followed. The results of the incremental cost-effectiveness analysis suggest that a combined policy is cost-effective. However, the cost-effectiveness of this policy (and indeed the childhood two-dose policy) is influenced by projected benefits that accrue many decades (80-100 years or more) after the start of vaccination. If the programme is evaluated over shorter time frames, then it would be unlikely to be deemed cost-effective, and may result in declines in population health, due to a projected rise in the incidence of HZ. The findings are also sensitive to a number of parameters that are inaccurately quantified, such as the risk of HZ in varicella vaccine responders.

Conclusions

Policy makers should be aware of the potential negative benefits in the first 30-50 years after introduction of a childhood varicella vaccine. This can only be partly mitigated by the introduction of a herpes zoster vaccine. They have to decide how they value the potential benefits beyond this time to consider childhood vaccination cost effective.     

Effectiveness of the live-attenuated herpes zoster vaccine 2 years after its introduction in Australia

BackgroundThe Australian National Herpes Zoster Immunisation Program commenced in November 2016 for people aged 70–79 years old in Australia but vaccine effectiveness (VE) in this setting has not previously been assessed.MethodsWe extracted records from two cohorts of patients aged 70–79 years in 2017 and 2018 respectively who were regular attenders in a nationwide general practice dataset, MedicineInsight. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate VE. Models were adjusted for potential confounders including age, sex, and other covariates. Analyses were also stratified by sex, presence of comorbid conditions and number of general practitioner (GP) visits in the previous year.ResultsThe 2017 cohort included 40,275 regular attenders and the 2018 cohort 41,735. Both cohorts had a mean age of 73.9 years and 52% were women. In 2017, among vaccinated people, over 9,688 person-years of follow-up, 35 cases of zoster were diagnosed giving an incidence of 3.6 per 1000 person-years compared to 8.7 per 1000 person-years (264 cases/30,317 person-years) among unvaccinated people. For 2018, among vaccinated people there were 66 incident zoster cases over 16,716 person-years giving an incidence of 3.9 per 1000 person-years compared to 6.3 per 1000 person-years (156 cases/24,782 person-years) among the unvaccinated. Overall, in the first year of the program, when the average time since vaccination was about 8 months, VE was 63.5% (95% CI: 47.5, 74.6) but this fell to 48.2% (95% CI: 30.0, 61.7) in the second year when the average time since vaccination was about 18 months. We found no difference in VE across age, sex, presence of comorbid conditions, and prior GP visit frequency (P-interaction > 0.05).ConclusionsVE was consistent with that estimated in other countries and international settings. However, our findings suggest waning effectiveness after the first year of the program. Further program evaluation is necessary.     

Cost-effectiveness of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (RZV) and Varicella Vaccine Live (VVL) against herpes zoster and post-herpetic neuralgia among adults aged 65 and over in Japan

BackgroundThe approval of the extended use of 1-dose varicella vaccine (VVL) in adults aged 50 and older against herpes zoster (HZ) in 2016 and the 2-dose recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) in 2018 raised the need to evaluate the value for money between these two vaccines.MethodsWe conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis with Markov modelling to evaluate the efficiency of the immunisation programmes from payer’s perspective. Eight strategies with different ages to receive VVL or RZV were set, namely: 65–84 year old (y.o.), 70–84 y.o., 75–84 y.o., and 80–84 y.o. VVL- or RZV-strategy. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) compared with curative care scenario were calculated. The health statuses following the target cohort were as follows: acute HZ followed by recovery, post-herpetic neuralgia followed by recovery, post HZ/PHN, recurrence of HZ, and general death.ResultsAt the vaccination cost ¥8000 (US$73) for 1-dose ZVL and ¥30,000 (US$273) for 2-dose RZV, ICERs ranged from ¥2,633,587/US$23,942 (age 80–84 y.o.) to ¥3,434,267 or US$31,221 (age 65–84 y.o.)/QALY gained for VVL-strategies; from ¥5,262,227 or US$47,838 (age 80–84 y.o.) to ¥6,278,557 or US$57,078/QALY gained (age 65–84 y.o.) for RZV-strategies. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves derived from probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that if the cost-effective threshold was at ¥3,000,000 or US$27,273/QALY, the acceptability was 90.7% and 8.8% for 65–84 VVL-strategy and 65–84 RZV-strategy, respectively; if at ¥5,000,000 or US$45,455/QALY, 56.2% and 43.8%, and if at ¥10,000,000 or US$90,909/QALY 11.9% and 88.1%, respectively.ConclusionVaccinating individuals aged 65–84 y.o., 70–84 y.o., 75–84 y.o., 80–84 y.o. with VVL or RZV to prevent HZ-associated disease in Japan can be cost-effective from payer’s perspective, with vaccination costs at ¥8,000 per shot for VVL, ¥30,000 for 2-dose RZV. While the results suggesting that only 65–84 VVL-strategy and 65–84 RZV strategy should be considered when introducing HZ immunisation programme. The optimal strategy varies depending on the willingness-to-pay threshold.     

Effectiveness of herpes zoster vaccination in an older United Kingdom population

BackgroundVaccination against herpes zoster was introduced in the United Kingdom in 2013 for individuals aged 70 years, with a phased catch-up campaign for 71–79 year olds. Vaccine introduction has resulted in a marked fall in incident herpes zoster and in post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), but formal evaluation of vaccine effectiveness is needed.MethodsIn a population-based cohort study of older individuals born between 1933 and 1946, we used linked UK anonymised primary care health records for the first three years of the vaccination programme (01/09/2013–31/08/2016) and multivariable Poisson regression to obtain incidence rates and vaccine effectiveness (VE) against zoster and PHN.ResultsAmong 516,547 individuals, 21% were vaccinated. Incidence of zoster was 3.15/1000 person-years in vaccinees and 8.80/1000 person-years in unvaccinated individuals. After adjustment, VE was 64% (95%CI = 60–68%) against incident zoster and 81% (95%CI = 61–91%) against PHN, with very similar VE estimates in the routine and catch-up cohorts. VE against zoster was lower in those with a previous history of zoster: 47% (95%CI = 31–58%) versus 64% (95%CI = 60–68%) in those without previous zoster. There was evidence of waning VE over time, from 69% (95%CI = 65–74%) in the first year after vaccination to 45% (95%CI = 29–57%) by the third year.ConclusionThis first formal assessment of VE in the UK zoster vaccination programme demonstrates good effectiveness of zoster vaccine, and very good protection against PHN. The findings provide evidence that VE is similar across the age groups targeted for vaccination in the UK, and on duration of protection of the vaccine in public health use. The study provides key information for decision-makers about the future direction of UK zoster vaccination programme, indicating that the live zoster vaccine may be more cost-effective than estimated previously. It also supports efforts to communicate the benefits of zoster vaccination to address the declining coverage observed across the UK.