Racial/Ethnic Differences in Spontaneous HCV Clearance in HIV Infected and Uninfected Women

Background/Aims

Among individuals without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), African Americans have lower spontaneous clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) than Caucasians, and women have higher clearance than men. Few studies report racial/ethnic differences in acute HCV in HIV infected, or Hispanic women. We examined racial/ethnic differences in spontaneous HCV clearance in a population of HCV mono- and co-infected women.

Methods

We conducted a cross sectional study of HCV seropositive women (897 HIV infected and 168 HIV uninfected) followed in the US multicenter, NIH-funded Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS), to determine the association of race/ethnicity with spontaneous HCV clearance, as defined by undetectable HCV RNA at study entry.

Results

Among HIV and HCV seropositive women, 18.7 % were HCV RNA negative, 60.9 % were African American, 19.3 % Hispanic and 17.7 % Caucasian. HIV infected African American women were less likely to spontaneously clear HCV than Hispanic (OR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.38–0.93, p = 0.022) or Caucasian women (OR 0.57, 95 % CI 0.36–0.93, p = 0.023). Among HIV uninfected women, African Americans had less HCV clearance than Hispanics (OR 0.18, 95 % CI 0.07–0.48, p = 0.001) or Caucasians (OR 0.26, 95 % CI 0.09–0.79, p = 0.017). There were no significant differences in HCV clearance between Hispanics and Caucasians, among either HIV infected (OR 0.97, 95 % CI 0.57–1.66, p = 0.91) or uninfected (OR 1.45, 95 % CI 0.56–3.8, p = 0.45) women.

Conclusions

African Americans were less likely to spontaneously clear HCV than Hispanics or Caucasians, regardless of HIV status. No significant differences in spontaneous HCV clearance were observed between Caucasian and Hispanic women. Future studies incorporating IL28B genotype may further explain these observed racial/ethnic differences in spontaneous HCV clearance.     

Absence of liver steatosis in HIV–HCV co-infected patients receiving regimens containing tenofovir or abacavir

Background

In human immunodeficiency virus–hepatitis C virus (HIV–HCV) co-infected patients, steatosis has been independently associated with a number of antiretroviral drugs, including stavudine, especially in patients with non-3 HCV genotypes. We retrospectively investigated the presence of steatosis among HIV–HCV co-infected and HCV mono-infected patients, and the role of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or abacavir (ABC) in determining hepatic steatosis.

Methods

Liver steatosis was retrospectively evaluated in all consecutive biopsies performed in the period 2000–2008 in HCV mono-infected and HIV–HCV co-infected patients. A steatosis rate of >5 % was considered to be significant, and a multivariate logistic analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with steatosis.

Results

In total, 393 HCV-infected patients underwent liver biopsy during the study period, of whom 205 (52.2 %) were co-infected with HIV. A steatosis rate of >5 % was diagnosed in 33.0 % of HCV mono-infected and in 47.8 % of HIV–HCV co-infected patients (P = 0.003). The rate of steatosis was higher in patients resuming antiretroviral therapy (54.7 %) than in naïve patients (33.3 %; P = 0.006). When the overall population was considered, steatosis was associated to HCV genotype 3 [odds ratio (OR) 4.53, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.71–7.58; P < 0.001]. In terms of the use of nucleos(t)ide drugs in HIV co-infected patients, multivariate analysis showed that only in patients with HCV genotypes other than genotype 3 was steatosis related to the use of stavudine (OR 5.38, 95 % CI 1.18-24.53; P = 0.03). The use of TDF (OR 1.07, 95 % CI 0.39–2.88; P = 0.898) or ABC (OR 0.592, 95 % CI 0.09–4.07; P = 0.594) was not associated with steatosis.

Conclusion

In HCV mono-infected and HIV–HCV co-infected patients, steatosis appears to be a virus-mediated effect of HCV genotype 3. In HIV patients infected with HCV genotypes other than genotype 3, the risk of developing steatosis was higher in those patients resuming antiretroviral regimens containing old drugs rather than the new antiretrovirals.     

Analysis of the complete open reading frame of hepatitis C virus in genotype 2a infection reveals critical sites influencing the response to peginterferon and ribavirin therapy

Purpose

A proportion of patients infected with genotype 2a hepatitis C virus (HCV) cannot achieve a sustained virological response (SVR) to pegylated-interferon plus ribavirin therapy (PEG-IFN/RBV) but the reason remains unclear. The present study aimed to clarify the possible correlation between viral sequence variations and final outcome.

Methods

The pretreatment complete open reading frame (ORF) sequences of genotype 2a HCV were determined by direct sequencing for two independent groups of patients (43 patients as test; group 1 and 35 as validation; group 2), and the correlation with the final outcome was explored.

Results

Patients with SVR (n = 58) and with non-SVR (n = 20) differed significantly in pretreatment HCV RNA level (p = 0.002), fibrosis score (p = 0.047), and cumulative RBV dosage (p = 0.003). By comparison of all amino acid positions in the complete HCV ORFs, threonine at amino acid (aa) 110 in the core region was remarkably frequent in SVR (p = 0.01 for group 1, p = 0.004 for group 2, and p = 5E?05 for combined). A sliding window analysis revealed that the total number of amino acid variations within the NS5A aa 2258–2306 region were significantly high in SVR compared to non-SVR patients (p = 0.01 for group 1, p = 0.006 for group 2, and p = 0.0006 for combined). Multivariate analyses revealed that core aa 110 (p = 0.02), NS5A aa 2258–2306 (p = 0.03), and cumulative RBV dosage (p = 0.02) were identified as independent variables associated with the final outcome.

Conclusions

The outcome of PEG-IFN/RBV therapy is significantly influenced by variation in the core and NS5A regions in genotype 2a HCV infection.     

Comparison of cognitive performance in HIV or HCV mono-infected and HIV–HCV co-infected patients

Purpose

Our aim was to explore the interplay between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in the expression of cognitive disorders.

Methods

We performed a multi-centre cross-sectional study, enrolling three groups of asymptomatic outpatients matched for age and education: (1) HIV mono-infected; (2) HCV mono-infected; (3) HIV–HCV co-infected. All subjects were subjected to the Zung depression scale and a comprehensive neuropsychological battery.

Results

A total of 50 patients for each group were enrolled. Patients in the three groups did not significantly differ in the main common demographic and clinical characteristics, except for a lower proportion of past injecting drug use (IDU) in group 1 (4 %) in comparison to groups 2 (38 %, p < 0.001) and 3 (78 %, p < 0.001), a longer duration of HIV infection in group 3 in comparison to group 1 (p < 0.001) and a longer duration of HCV infection in group 3 in comparison to group 2 (p = 0.028). Overall, 39.3 % of patients showed minor cognitive impairment, with a higher proportion in group 3 (54 %) when compared to groups 1 (28 %, p = 0.015) or 2 (36 %, p = 0.108). Patients in group 3 [odds ratio (OR) 3.35, p = 0.038 when compared to group 1] and those with higher depression scores (OR 1.05, p = 0.017) showed an increased risk of cognitive impairment after adjusting for education and past injection drug use. In particular, group 3 showed worse performance in psychomotor speed tasks when compared to group 1 (p = 0.033).

Conclusions

A worse cognitive performance in HIV–HCV co-infected patients was observed, suggesting an additive role of the two viruses in the pathogenesis of cognitive disorders.     

Response-Guided Therapy for Hepatitis C Genotype 2 and 3 in Those with HIV Coinfection

Background

Current guidelines recommend that interferon-based treatment of hepatitis C (HCV) genotype 2 or 3 in those with HIV coinfection should be for 48 weeks, especially if HCV PCR remains positive after 4 weeks of treatment.

Aim

To examine a single-center experience using response-guided therapy (RGT) using pegylated interferon (PegIFN) and weight-based ribavirin (RBV) for treating HCV genotype 2 or 3 in those with HIV coinfection.

Methods

Electronic medical records were used to identify patients with HCV genotype 2 or 3 HIV coinfection seen at the Toronto General Hospital Immunodeficiency Clinic from February 2003 to December 2012. HCV PCR was tested after every 4 weeks of treatment until it was negative (<50 IU/mL). RGT protocol was as follows: Those with HCV PCR first negative after 4 weeks (VR4) were treated 24 weeks; first negative after 8 weeks (VR8) treated 36 weeks and VR12 treated 48 weeks.

Result

Database search identified 35 individuals with HCV genotype 2 or 3. Twelve were excluded. Total 23 patients completed the treatment and were included for data analysis. Eleven of 23 (48 %) achieved VR4 and eleven of 23 (48 %) achieved VR8. Only one individual had detectable viremia to week 12 and required 48 weeks of treatment. The majority (96 %) were successfully treated with <48 weeks of PegIFN–RBV therapy. One hundred percent achieved SVR with a response-guided HCV therapy.

Conclusion

The use of response-guided therapy allows therapy to be shortened in the majority of individuals. HCV PCR testing should be performed every 4 weeks during the first 12 weeks of therapy until HCV PCR is negative.     

Favorable adverse event profile of sofosbuvir/ribavirin compared to boceprevir/interferon/ribavirin for treatment of hepatitis C

Background

Triple therapy for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with first-generation directly acting antiviral agents, the non-structural serine protease inhibitors boceprevir (BOC) and telaprevir have resulted in improved sustained virologic response (SVR) rates. However, a high incidence of adverse events (AEs), high pill burdens and drug interactions remain significant barriers to successful completion of therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the AEs observed with BOC triple therapy in comparison to IFN-free sofosbuvir/ribavirin (SOF/RBV) therapy in HCV monoinfected, genotype-1 (GT-1) individuals.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated HCV monoinfected, treatment-naïve or -experienced, GT-1 individuals treated with either BOC/IFN/RBV at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore (n = 97) or SOF/RBV in the NIAID SPARE clinical trial (n = 60). AEs, namely hematologic (hemoglobin, neutrophil and platelet counts), hepatic (alanine transaminase or bilirubin) and renal (eGFR), were measured according to the DAIDS toxicity table (version 1.0).

Results

BOC/IFN/RBV was associated with significantly more AEs, most commonly neutropenia, anemia and thrombocytopenia. In the SOF/RBV cohort, five (8 %) patients discontinued treatment early, but none (0 %) were because of AEs, while 60 (62 %) patients on triple therapy discontinued treatment early, 34 (57 %) because of AEs. SVR24 rates were 68 versus 34 % with SOF/RBV versus BOC/IFN/RBV.

Conclusions

SOF/RBV treatment was associated with fewer side effects than BOC-based triple therapy, appearing to be a safer and more tolerable alternative for HCV GT-1 subjects. These results show that emerging IFN-free therapies may enhance patient adherence, allowing treatment of larger number of patients with improved efficacy.     

Factors influencing liver fibrosis and necroinflammation in HIV/HCV coinfection and HCV monoinfection

Objectives

To define differences in liver histology between HIV/HCV coinfection and HCV monoinfection, and to investigate possible causative factors.

Methods

Liver biopsies (LBs) from 440 consecutive HIV/HCV-coinfected patients (Group HIV/HCV) and 374 consecutive HCV-monoinfected patients (Group HCV) were evaluated for necroinflammation and fibrosis (Ishak) by a pathologist unaware of the clinical and laboratory data. All patients were HBsAg-negative, with no history of alcohol abuse and naïve to anti-HCV treatment. At LB, 78.4 % of patients in Group HIV/HCV were on an antiretroviral regimen.

Results

HIV/HCV-coinfected patients compared to the HCV-monoinfected patients were younger (p < 0.0001), more frequently males (p < 0.0001), and had HCV genotype 3 (p < 0.0001); they showed a good immunological condition (CD4+ cell count: 518 ± 166 cells/mm³). Patients in Group HIV/HCV more frequently showed a fibrosis score ≥4 (27.5 vs. 20.6 %, p < 0.05) and a necroinflammation score ≥9 (25.9 vs. 13.4 %; p < 0.0001). The prevalence of patients with fibrosis score ≥4 was significantly higher in older age classes in both Group HIV/HCV (p < 0.005) and Group HCV (p < 0.05). A necroinflammation score ≥9 was significantly higher in older age classes only in Group HIV/HCV (p < 0.05). A multivariate analysis for Group HIV/HCV revealed that the patient age and nadir of CD4+ cell count were independently associated to higher degrees of fibrosis, the patient age and antiretroviral treatment were associated to higher degrees of necroinflammation, and HCV genotype 3 was associated to higher degrees of steatosis.

Conclusion

The data suggest a need for early anti-HCV treatment in both HCV-monoinfected and HIV/HCV-coinfected patients.     

Dual treatment of acute HCV infection in HIV co-infection: influence of HCV genotype upon treatment outcome

Purpose

With DAAs still only being licensed for chronic HCV infection, the ongoing epidemic of acute hepatitis C (AHC) infection among MSM highlights the need to identify factors allowing for optimal HCV treatment outcome.

Methods

303 HIV-infected patients from 4 European countries with diagnosed acute HCV infection were treated early with pegylated interferon (pegIFN) and ribavirin (RBV) (n = 273) or pegylated interferon alone (n = 30).

Results

All patients were male, median age was 39 years. Main routes of transmission were MSM (95 %) and IVDU (3 %). 69 % of patients were infected with HCV GT 1, 4.3 % with GT 2, 10.6 % with GT 3, 16.1 % with GT 4. Overall SVR rate was 69.3 % (210/303). RVR (p ≤ 0.001), 48-w treatment duration (p ≤ 0.001) and GT 2/3 (p = 0.024) were significantly associated with SVR. SVR rates were significantly higher in HCV GT 2/3 receiving pegIFN and RBV (33/35) when compared with pegIFN mono-therapy (6/10) (94 % vs. 60 % respectively; p = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, pegIFN/RBV combination therapy (p = 0.017) and rapid virological response (RVR) (p = 0.022) were significantly associated with SVR in HCV GT 2/3. In HCV GT 1/4, RVR (p ≤ 0.001) and 48-w treatment duration (p ≤ 0.001) were significantly associated with SVR.

Conclusions

Treatment of AHC GT 2 and 3 infections with pegIFN/RBV is associated with higher SVR rates suggesting different cure rates depending on HCV genotype similar to the genotype effects seen previously in chronic HCV under pegIFN/RBV. With pegIFN/RBV still being the gold standard of AHC treatment and in light of cost issues around DAAs and very limited licensed interferon-free DAA treatment options for chronic HCV GT 3 infection AHC GT 3 patients might benefit most from early interferon-containing treatment.

     

Immunological dysfunction during or after antiviral therapy for recurrent hepatitis C reduces graft survival

Introduction

Pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) therapy for recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation (LT) is associated with a lower sustained virological response (SVR) rate as well as more frequent side effects compared to non-transplant patients. We aimed to determine the incidence and clinical characteristics of LT recipients with recurrent hepatitis C who developed immunological dysfunction (ID) during or after PEG-IFN/RBV therapy and to assess its impact on patient and graft survival.

Methods

Seventy-four deceased donor LT recipients with histological recurrence of hepatitis C were treated with PEG-IFN/RBV from 1/00 to 12/08. ID was defined as biopsy-proven rejection or moderate plasma cell hepatitis. Patients were followed up until death, re-LT or 30 September 2011.

Results

Twelve patients (16 %) had ID, 8 (10.7 %) had cholestasis without ID, while 54 had no ID/cholestasis during or after discontinuation of PEG-IFN/RBV therapy. Biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection prior to (hazard ratio = 4.87, p = 0.009) and type of immunosuppression at the time of initiation of PEG-IFN/RBV were the only independent predictors of ID. Patients who were on tacrolimus at the time of initiation of PEG-IFN/RBV had a significantly lower risk of ID compared to those who were on cyclosporine (HR 0.254, p = 0.023). Patients with ID had a trend toward a lower SVR rate (25 vs. 54 %, p = 0.18) and a significantly higher rate of graft failure (33 vs. 4 %, p = 0.004) compared to patients with no ID/cholestasis.

Conclusions

ID is common during or after PEG-IFN/RBV therapy for recurrent hepatitis C and frequently associated with decreased graft survival, trending toward low rates of SVR. Careful monitoring of liver biochemistries during or after PEG-IFN/RBV therapy with a low threshold to biopsy patients and particularly those receiving cyclosporine-based immunosuppression may improve outcomes in these patients.     

Hepatitis C viral load predicts tumor recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma regardless of the genotype of hepatitis C virus

Purpose

To clarify the prognostic impact of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype after curative resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

A total of 199 patients who underwent a curative hepatic resection for HCV-related HCC were reviewed. The clinical outcomes were compared between patients infected with HCV genotype 1b (n = 160) and those infected with other genotypes (n = 39).

Results

With a comparable median HCV viral load (6.0 vs. 5.8 log₁₀ IU/mL, p = 0.17), the 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates (25 vs. 20 %, p = 0.65) and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (72 vs. 65 %, p = 0.73) were similar between the two groups. A multivariate analysis confirmed that HCV viral load of +1.0 log₁₀ IU/mL [hazard ratio (HR), 1.48], major vascular invasion (HR, 3.20), recurrent tumor (HR, 1.77), and preoperative des-gamma carboxyprothrombin level >40 mAu/mL (HR, 1.64) were independent predictors of tumor recurrence, while the HCV genotype was not a significant risk factor. When the population was stratified according to the HCV viral load, a significant difference was observed in the RFS rate for both genotype 1b (p = 0.003) and the other genotypes (p = 0.037) at HCV viral load of 5.3 log₁₀ IU/mL.

Conclusions

The HCV genotype does not affect the surgical outcomes of patients with HCC. A lower HCV viral load is advantageous regardless of the HCV genotype.     

Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for treatment of HIV/HCV co-infected patients

BACKGROUND: Current therapies for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV co-infected patients have a low success rate and are poorly tolerated. We have evaluated the efficacy and safety of interferon alfa-2b (IFN) + ribavirin (RBV) versus pegylated interferon alfa-2b (PEG-INF) + RBV. METHODS: Randomized, single-centre, open-label clinical trial including patients with: detectable HCV-RNA, alanine aminotransferase > 1.5-fold upper limit of normal, abnormal liver histology, CD4 cell count > 250 x 10/l and HIV RNA < 10 000 copies/ml. Patients were assigned to INF (3 x 10 units three times/week) or PEG-IFN (100-150 microg/week) plus RBV (800-1200 mg/day). Duration of treatment was 48 weeks (only 24 weeks for HCV genotypes 2 or 3 and baseline HCV RNA < 800 000 IU/ml). The primary endpoint was a sustained virological response (SVR). RESULTS: Ninety-five patients were randomized (43 INF + RBV, 52 PEG-INF + RBV), 68% males, 82% injecting drug users; 63% genotypes 1 or 4 and 36% genotypes 2 or 3; 62% fibrosis index grade >/=2 and 30% bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis. SVR was significantly higher in the PEG-INF + RBV arm, 44% versus 21% (intent to treat; P = 0.017). Among patients with genotypes 1 or 4, SVR were 38% versus 7% (P = 0.007) and 53% versus 47% (P = 0.730) for genotypes 2 or 3. CD4 cell count but not its percentage dropped in both arms and HIV RNA viral load did not change from baseline. Side effects were very frequent in both arms leading to treatment discontinuation in 14 patients without statistical differences between arms (P = 0.565). CONCLUSION: PEG-INF + RBV was significantly more effective than INF + RBV for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in HIV co-infected patients, mainly of genotype 1 or 4.     

Meta-analysis of patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 6: 48 weeks with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is superior to 24 weeks

Background

Hepatitis C virus genotype 6 (HCV-6) is common in patients from Southeast Asia and the surrounding regions. Optimal treatment duration for HCV-6 is unknown given the inconclusive evidence from studies with varying methodologies and small sample sizes.

Methods

A literature search for ‘genotype 6’ in MEDLINE and EMBASE in October 2013 produced 161 and 251 articles, respectively. Additional abstracts were identified from four major international GI/liver conferences in 2012/2013. Inclusion criteria were original studies with ≥10 HCV-6 treatment-naïve patients treated with pegylated interferon + ribavirin (PEG IFN+RBV). Exclusion criteria were coinfections with HBV, HIV, other HCV genotypes, and/or other liver diseases. Primary outcome was pooled sustained virologic response (SVR). Heterogeneity was defined by Cochrane Q test (p value of 0.10) and I ² statistic (≥50 %).

Results

A total of 13 studies with 641 patients were included. The pooled SVR estimate was 77 % (CI 70–83 %) (Q value = 38.4, p value <0.001, I ² = 68.7 %) overall, 79 % (CI 73–84 %) for the 48-week group and 59 % (CI 46–70 %) for 24-week group, respectively. In studies with direct comparison of the two groups, SVR was superior in patients treated for 48 versus 24 weeks, OR 1.9 (CI 1.08–3.2, p = 0.026). In studies with direct comparison of patients with rapid virologic response (RVR), there was no difference in SVR between 48 versus 24 weeks, OR 1.74 (CI 0.65–4.64, p = 0.27).

Conclusion

Hepatitis C virus genotype 6 patients should be treated for 48 weeks, and those who achieve RVR may receive the shorter 24-week treatment duration. The high SVR (~80 %) with 48 weeks of PEG IFN+RBV therapy may be a cost-effective option for HCV-6 patients from resource-poor regions.     

Alcoholism worsens the survival of patients with hepatitis B virus and C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma

Background/Aims

Chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus (HBV, HCV) infection and alcoholism are common etiologies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The characteristics and impact of alcoholism and/or HCV/HBV infection on HBV- and HCV-related HCC, respectively, are investigated in this study.

Methods

A total of 1,888 patients were retrospectively investigated and categorized into six groups, HBV only (n = 977), HBV with alcoholism (n = 197), HCV only (n = 544), HCV with alcoholism (n = 67), dual HBV and HCV (n = 82), and dual virus with alcoholism (n = 21), to examine their interactions on the outcome.

Results

Compared to their counterparts, alcoholic patients coinfected with HBV and/or HCV tended to be younger, had higher male-to-female ratios, worse performance status, more severe liver cirrhosis, advanced cancer staging, and tumor burden than patients without alcoholism. In survival analysis, patients with HBV with alcoholism had a significantly decreased survival than the HBV-only group (p = 0.001). A shortened survival was also observed in HCV with alcoholism group compared to the HCV-only group (p = 0.011). Dual virus infection with alcoholism did not significantly worsen the survival compared to the dual virus infection group. In the Cox proportional hazards model, HBV with alcoholism group [risk ratio (RR) 1.299, p = 0.032] and HCV with alcoholism (RR 1.523, p = 0.025) group were independent predictors associated with decreased survival compared to their counterpart of HBV- and HCV-only groups.

Conclusions

Alcoholism in patients with HBV or HCV infection is characterized by early development of HCC with advanced cirrhosis and cancer staging at diagnosis. Alcoholism independently predicts an increased risk of mortality in patients with HBV- and HCV-related HCC.     

Relevance of the Core 70 and IL-28B polymorphism and response-guided therapy of peginterferon alfa-2a ± ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C of Genotype 1b: a multicenter randomized trial,ReGIT-J study

Background

We conducted a multicenter randomized clinical trial to determine the optimal treatment strategy against chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) with genotype 1b and a high viral load (G1b/high).

Methods

The study subjects included 153 patients with G1b/high. Patients were initially treated with PEG-IFNα-2a alone and then randomly assigned to receive different treatment regimens. Ribavirin (RBV) was administered to all patients with HCV RNA at week 4. Patients negative for HCV RNA at week 4 were randomly assigned to receive PEG-IFNα-2a (group A) or PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV (group B). Patients who showed HCV RNA at week 4 but were negative at week 12 were randomly assigned to receive weekly PEG-IFNα-2a (group C) or biweekly therapy (group D). Patients who showed HCV RNA at week 12 but were negative at week 24 were randomly assigned to receive PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV (group E) or PEG-IFNα-2a/RBV/fluvastatin (group F).

Results

Overall, the rate of sustained virological response (SVR) was 46 % (70/153). The total SVR rate in the group (A, D, and F) of response-guided therapy was significantly higher than that in the group (B, C, and E) of conventional therapy [70 % (38/54) versus 52 % (32/61), p = 0.049]. Although IL28-B polymorphism and Core 70 mutation were significantly associated with efficacy, patients with rapid virological response (RVR) and complete early virological response (cEVR) achieved high SVR rates regardless of their status of IL-28B polymorphism and Core 70 mutation.

Conclusion

In addition to knowing the IL-28B polymorphism and Core 70 mutation status, understanding the likelihood of virological response during treatment is critical in determining the appropriate treatment strategy.     

Impact of Anti-Thymocyte Globulin During Immunosuppression Induction in Patients with Hepatitis C After Liver Transplantation

Background

Induction immunosuppression with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) provides potential benefits after liver transplantation (LT). However, its use in patients with LT and hepatitis C (HCV) is controversial.

Aim

To evaluate the 1- and 2-year patient survival and HCV recurrence rate in patients receiving ATG during the induction phase of immunosuppression (IPI) after LT.

Methods

A total of 49 patients undergoing their first LT for HCV were randomized to receive ATG during IPI. Patient survival and HCV recurrence were determined at 1 and 2 years. The frequency of acute cellular rejection (ACR), infections, and neoplasms was also evaluated.

Results

Twenty-six patients were randomized to receive ATG (Arm-1) and 23 to standard induction therapy (Arm-2). Those given ATG had lower HCV recurrence (26.9 vs 73.9 %, p = 0.001). The 1- and 2-year patient survival rates were similar for both arms (p = 0.33). Infections occurred in 46.1 % subjects in Arm-1 and 34.7 % in Arm-2 (p = 0.562). There was a greater proportion of fungal infections in Arm-1 (19.2 vs 0 %, p = 0.032).

Conclusions

ATG during the IPI was associated with lower frequency of recurrence of HCV in patients undergoing LT. This, however, did not affect the 1- and 2-year survival and the frequency of ACR, infections, or neoplasms.     

Hepatitis C viremia interferes with serum hepatitis B virus surface antigen and DNA levels in hepatitis B uremics

Purpose

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HCV might cause reciprocal interference. We aimed to elucidate the influence of HCV and interleukin-28B (IL-28B) genetic variants in the HBV DNA and HBsAg levels in uremic HBV carriers.

Methods

Assessment of HCV and HBV viral loads, HBsAg levels and IL-28B genotype were performed in 229 HBsAg-positive patients from a cohort of 1,681 uremics.

Results

Patients with HCV viremia had significantly lower HBV DNA (2.58 ± 0.80 vs. 3.16 ± 1.48 log IU/mL, p = 0.005) and HBsAg levels (1.33 ± 1.35 vs. 2.23 ± 1.31 log IU/mL, p = 0.002) compared with those without. IL-28B rs8099917 genotype had no impact on HBsAg and HBV DNA levels. In multivariate regression analysis, HCV RNA levels had a more significant negative correlation with HBsAg levels [β ?0.905; 95 % confidence interval (CI) ?1.477, ?0.334; p = 0.002] than with HBV DNA levels (β ?0.586; 95 % CI ?1.206, 0.034; p = 0.06). The serum HBV DNA and HBsAg levels had a positive correlation (r = 0.43, p < 0.001) among the 215 HBeAg-negative patients. However, the correlation was not observed in patients with HCV viremia (r = 0.23, p = 0.29). Linear regression analysis revealed that age (β ?0.286; 95 % CI ?0.043, ?0.014; p < 0.001) and the HBV DNA level (β 0.373; 95 % CI 0.239, 0.549; p < 0.001) correlated independently with the HBsAg level among HBeAg-negative patients without HCV viremia, but not among those with concomitant HCV viremia.

Conclusions

HCV viremia suppressed both HBsAg and HBV DNA levels. The HBsAg levels correlated with the HBV DNA levels only in patients without concomitant HCV viremia.     

IL28B polymorphisms predict the virological response to standard therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 4 infection

Background

Genome-wide association studies have recently revealed that several single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the interleukin (IL) 28B genes can predict the sustained virological response (SVR) to pegylated interferon-α2a/b plus ribavirin in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-genotype 1 patients. However, data for patients infected with HCV genotype 4 (HCV-G4) are limited.

Aim

We analyzed the association of IL28B SNPs (hematological, biochemical, virological, and pathological factors) with SVR in the HCV-G4 monoinfected cohort of patients.

Patients and methods

One hundred twenty-nine treatment-naïve HCV-G4 patients undergoing treatment were recruited from three tertiary care centers in Saudi Arabia. Five IL28B SNPs (rs12979860, rs12980275, rs8105790, rs8099917, and rs72486680) were identified by polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing. SVR was statistically correlated with various clinical, histopathological, virological, and genetic parameters.

Results

SVR was significantly associated with the CC and AA alleles of rs12979860 (p = 0.008) and rs12980275 (p = 0.004), respectively. Moreover, albumin levels (p = 0.002) and platelet count (p = 0.039) showed significant differences in the SVR and No SVR groups. On multivariate analysis, the CC allele of rs12979860 (OR, 2.89; 95 % CI 1.6–6.2, p = 0.006) and albumin levels (OR, 1.2; 95 % CI 1.1–1.4, p = 0.001) independently predicted SVR.

Conclusions

IL28B polymorphism (CC allele of rs12979860) predicts the sustained response to antiviral therapy in HCV-G4.     

The safety and efficacy of peginterferon plus ribavirin in hepatitis C patients concomitant with malignancy other than hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study

Purpose

Cancer patients were generally excluded from the therapeutic guidelines of antiviral therapy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiviral therapy in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection concomitant with malignancy other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Twenty-five HCV patients with curative malignancy other than HCC (group A) and 75 sex- and age-matched controls (group B) were recruited into a prospective and case–control analysis. All patients received peginterferon-alpha-2a (PegIFN-alpha-2a) and weight-based ribavirin according to the current treatment recommendations. The primary outcome measurement was sustained virological response (SVR). The safety issue between groups was also compared.

Results

There were 22 (88.0 %) patients of group A and 59 (78.7 %) patients of group B who achieved an SVR (p = 0.39). The SVR rate was comparable between groups both in genotype-1 (HCV-1) (81.8 vs. 72.7 %, p = 0.70) and in genotype-2 (HCV-2) (92.9 vs. 83.3 %, p = 0.66) patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the achievement of a RVR (viral clearance during first 4 weeks of treatment) was the strongest predictor of an SVR (odds ratio/95 % confidence intervals [OR/CI]: 6.357/1.50 ? 26.99, p = 0.01), followed by lower baseline viral loads (OR/CI: 0.403/0.174 ? 0.936, p = 0.034) and higher dose of ribavirin exposure (OR/CI: 1.287/1.092 ? 1.517, p = 0.003), whilst previous occurrence of cancer was not associated with SVR. Treatment adherence (76.0 vs. 72.0 %, p = 0.70) and the incidences of grade 3 or more adverse events (28.0 vs. 20.0 %, p = 0.40) were comparable between two groups.

Conclusions

Chronic hepatitis C patients with non-HCC malignancies receiving peginterferon/ribavirin combination therapy carried favorable efficacy and safety outcomes.     

Clinical Outcomes of Hepatitis C Treated with Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin via Telemedicine Consultation in Northern California

Background

Patients in rural communities are less likely to receive treatment for their hepatitis C (HCV) infection. Telemedicine (TM) consultation can close the gap of access to specialists in remote and under-served areas.

Aim

To determine treatment response and side-effect profiles among HCV patients treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin via TM consultation in different rural locations in Northern California compared with patients treated in traditional hepatology office visits.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 80 HCV patients treated at different TM sites (TM, n = 40) and at the University of California Davis Hepatology Clinic (HC, n = 40) between 2006 and 2010, comparing baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes.

Results

At baseline, response to therapy was similar for patients in both groups. Sustained virological response (SVR) was similar in both groups (TM: 55 vs. HC: 43 %; p = 0.36), and a higher proportion of patients treated via telemedicine completed treatment (TM: 78 vs. HC: 53 %; p = 0.03). TM patients had many more visits per week of therapy (TM: 0.61 vs. HC: 0.07; p < 0.001). Neutropenia, GI side effects, fatigue, depression, weight loss, insomnia, and skin rash were similar in both groups. For HC patients incidence of anemia was significantly higher (53 %) than for the TM group (25 %; p = 0.02).

Conclusions

The two groups had equivalent SVR. For the TM group therapy completion was superior and incidence of anemia was lower. This initial study suggests that, as a group, patients with HCV, can be safely and effectively treated via telemedicine.     

Extended treatment with pegylated interferon alfa/ribavirin in patients with genotype 2/3 chronic hepatitis C who do not achieve a rapid virological response: final analysis of the randomised N-CORE trial

Background and aims

The combination of pegylated interferon alfa/ribavirin will likely remain the treatment of choice for HCV genotype 2/3 patients in financially constrained countries for the foreseeable future. Patients with poor on-treatment response may benefit from treatment extension. This study examined the effect of 48 versus 24 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin on the sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with HCV genotype 2/3 who did not achieve rapid virological response (RVR).

Methods

N-CORE was a multicentre, randomised, phase III study. HCV genotype 2/3 patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin without a rapid but with an early virological response were randomised at week 24 to stop treatment (Arm A) or continue to 48 weeks (Arm B). The primary efficacy endpoint was SVR.

Results

Two hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled. End of treatment response was similar in both treatment arms. SVR24 rates were not significantly greater in the extended treatment arm compared with the standard 24-week treatment in either the intention-to-treat or the per-protocol populations (61 vs. 52 %, p = 0.1934 and 63 vs. 52 %, p = 0.1461, respectively). Serious adverse events occurred more frequently in patients receiving extended treatment duration (12 %) versus 24-week therapy (4 %).

Conclusions

It is unclear whether the extension of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin treatment may benefit HCV genotype 2/3 patients who do not achieve RVR. The study was stopped early because recruitment was slower than anticipated, and this may have limited the statistical impact of these findings.