CA125阴性卵巢上皮癌的肿瘤标志物监测

目的：探讨卵巢上皮癌术前CA125检测阴性的原因及其术后肿瘤标志物监测的策略。方法：采用放射免疫法检测卵巢癌患者血清CA124，CA19－9，AFP，HCG－β含量，采用酶联免疫法检测血清CEA水平。结果：40例术前CA125阴性卵巢上皮癌中，浆液性癌的比例明显下降，恶化及复发病例中，CA125，CA19－9，CEA检测阳性率分别为60．0％（3／5），60．0％（3／5），40．0％（2／5）及42．9％（6／14），64．3％（9／14），57．1％（8／14），AFP，HCG－β阳性率很低。结论：卵巢上皮癌患者血清CA125水平与其病理类型，肿瘤负荷等因素有关，术前CA125阴性患者术后必须联合检测CA125，CA19－9，CEA。     

肿瘤标记物联合检测对CA125阴性卵巢癌预后判断的价值

目的探讨肿瘤标记物联合检测对CA125阴性上皮性卵巢癌预后判断的价值。方法采用放射免疫法,检测68例CA125阴性卵巢癌患者中血清CA125、CA199、CA724、AFP、HCG-β、TAM含量,采用酶联免疫法,检测血清CEA水平。免疫组织化学法检测肿瘤组织中CA125表达水平。结果在CA125免疫组织化学CA125阴性卵巢癌中,Ⅱ型(P=0.04)及Ⅲ-Ⅳ期(P<0.01)患者比例降低。复发病例中,CA125敏感性为66.7%(12/18),曲线下面积为0.81。CA199、CEA联合检测能够提高CA125对肿瘤复发的预测效率。联合检测CA724、AFP、β-HCG、TAM不能提高预测价值。结论血清CA125阴性卵巢上皮癌的随访,应结合CA125免疫组织化学结果,免疫组织化学CA125阳性患者可联合检测CA125、CA199、CEA等肿瘤标记物。     

血清CA19—9联合CA125检测在卵巢肿瘤中的应用价值

目的：探讨单独检测血清CA19－9值及结合CA125检测值在卵巢肿瘤中的应用价值。方法：采用ELISA法,检测206例卵巢包块（其中恶性肿瘤48例,良性包块158例）手术前血清CA19－9及CA125值,并对部分恶性肿瘤患者术后进行连续动态监测、随访。结果：恶性肿瘤组血清CA19－9及CA125检测的敏感性、特殊性分别为83．3％、71．5％;而联合CA19－9与CA125,对卵巢恶性肿瘤的敏感性可达91．6％。恶性肿瘤患者术后连续监测CA19－9及CA125值显示,两者升高则预后极差;两者维持在正常范围则预后好。结论：CA19－9的检测可作为CA125的补充,提高诊断的敏感性;同时对术后病情监测也有较大意义。     

多种肿瘤标记物联合检测肺癌的价值

[目的]探讨癌胚抗原（CEA）、大分子糖蛋白抗原（CA125）、血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）、细胞角蛋白19片段（CYFRA21-1）、CA19-9在老年肺癌诊断中的价值。[方法]测定74例老年肺癌（腺癌51例、鳞癌15例、小细胞癌8例）患者5项肿瘤标记物的水平，并与32例肺部良性病变患者比较。[结果]肺癌组5项血清肿瘤标记物浓度均高于良性病变组（P〈0．01），CEA、CA125、NSE、CA19．9、CYFRA21-1的特异性分别为84．3％、87．5％、81．3％、81．3％、90．6％，敏感性分别为60．8％、51．4％、27．0％、24．3％、17．6％。[结论]CEA、CA125对非小细胞肺癌有较大的辅助诊断价值。NSE对小细胞肺癌诊断意义较大。5项肿瘤标记物联合检测可提高肺癌检测的敏感性和特异性。     

联合检测血清CEA、CA125、CA19-9和CA72-4对大肠癌临床价值的探讨

目的:探讨血清CEA、CA125、CA19-9和CA72-4联合检测对大肠癌的临床价值.方法:采用电化学发光法对44例大肠癌患者手术前后、28例大肠息肉患者、30例健康体检者血清CEA、CA125、CA19-9和CA72-4水平进行检测.结果:大肠癌患者血清中四种肿瘤标志物水平明显高于大肠息肉患者和健康体健者(P＜0.05).大肠癌Dukes C-D期患者血清中四种肿瘤标志物水平明显高于Dukes A-B期患者(P＜0.05).同时大肠癌高、中分化患者血清中四种肿瘤标志物水平和低分化患者血清中四种肿瘤标志物水平相比较,差异有统计学意义(P＜0.05).四种肿瘤标志物联合检查结肠癌的诊断敏感性和准确性明显高于单一标志物.大肠癌患者作根治性切除术后1个月血清中四种肿瘤标志物含量较术前明显降低(P＜0.05),而作姑息性切除术后1个月血清中四种肿瘤标志物含量与术前相比,下降不明显(P＞0.05).结论:联合检测血清CEA、CA125、CA19-9和CA72-4水平可作为大肠癌的早期诊断、手术方法的选择、疗效评价及预后监测有意义的参考指标.     

多种肿瘤标记物联合检测肺癌的价值

[目的]探讨癌胚抗原（CEA）、大分子糖蛋白抗原（CA125）、血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）、细胞角蛋白19片段（CYFRA21-1）、CA19-9在老年肺癌诊断中的价值。[方法]测定74例老年肺癌（腺癌51例、鳞癌15例、小细胞癌8例）患者5项肿瘤标记物的水平，并与32例肺部良性病变患者比较。[结果]肺癌组5项血清肿瘤标记物浓度均高于良性病变组（P〈0．01），CEA、CA125、NSE、CA19．9、CYFRA21-1的特异性分别为84．3％、87．5％、81．3％、81．3％、90．6％，敏感性分别为60．8％、51．4％、27．0％、24．3％、17．6％。[结论]CEA、CA125对非小细胞肺癌有较大的辅助诊断价值。NSE对小细胞肺癌诊断意义较大。5项肿瘤标记物联合检测可提高肺癌检测的敏感性和特异性。     

卵巢癌血清HE4、CA72-4、CA125水平测定

目的 探讨卵巢癌血清人附睾分泌蛋白4（HE4）、CA72-4、CA125水平及临床意义.方法 入组我院收治的卵巢癌患者45例、卵巢良性病变30例,并纳入同期女性健康体检者30例作为对照,采用电化学发光法分别检测各组血清中HE4、CA72-4、CA125水平.结果 卵巢癌组血清HE4、CA72-4、CA125水平均高于卵巢良性病变组和健康对照组（P〈0.05）.HE4以〉150 pmol·L-1,CA72-4以5.3 u·mL-1,CA125以35 u·mL-1为阳性参考值,三者联合检测的敏感性为93.3%,特异性为73.3%.结论 卵巢癌患者血清中HE4、CA72-4、CA125处于高水平,联合检测可提高卵巢癌的诊断率.     

血清Mesothelin和CA125联合检测在上皮性卵巢癌诊断中的意义

目的：研究联合检测血清Mesothelin和CA125在上皮性卵巢癌诊断中的临床意义。方法：采用定量酶联免疫吸附试验（ELISA）检测上皮性卵巢癌患者31例,良性卵巢肿瘤32例和正常妇女30例血清中的Me-sothelin和CA125水平。结果：上皮性卵巢癌患者的Mesothelin水平明显高于良性卵巢肿瘤患者和正常对照组（P〈0.01）,良性卵巢肿瘤组患者与正常对照组的差异无显著性（P〉0.05）。不同类型的上皮性卵巢癌的Mesothelin的差异无显著性（P〉0.05）。Mesothelin和CA125联合检测对上皮性卵巢癌诊断的灵敏度和正确率明显高于单项检测CA125或Mesothelin（P值均〈0.05）。结论：血清Mesothelin和CA125联合检测可提高上皮性卵巢癌的早期诊断率。     

血清糖类抗原125、人附睾蛋白4、癌胚抗原对上皮性卵巢癌患者术前临床分期的评估价值

目的 探讨血清糖类抗原125(CA125)、人附睾蛋白4(HE4)、癌胚抗原（CEA）对上皮性卵巢癌患者术前临床分期的评估价值。方法 收集284例上皮性卵巢癌患者的病历资料,所有患者均于初诊入院时采用酶联免疫吸附试验（ELISA）检测血清CA125、HE4、CEA水平。所有患者均接受手术治疗并明确临床分期。比较不同临床特征上皮性卵巢癌患者的血清CA125、HE4、CEA水平。采用受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析血清CA125、HE4、CEA单独及联合检测对上皮性卵巢癌患者术前临床分期的评估价值。结果 肿瘤扩散、淋巴结转移、远处转移、Ⅲ～Ⅳ期上皮性卵巢癌患者的血清CA125、HE4、CEA水平分别明显高于无肿瘤扩散、无淋巴结转移、无远处转移、Ⅰ～Ⅱ期的患者,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.01）。血清CA125、HE4、CEA联合检测评估上皮性卵巢癌患者术前Ⅲ～Ⅳ期的曲线下面积（AUC）高于各指标单独检测,差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 肿瘤扩散、淋巴结转移、远处转移、Ⅲ～Ⅳ期上皮性卵巢癌患者的血清CA125、HE4、CEA水平均较高,三者联合检测可评估上皮性卵巢癌患者...     

血清AFP、β-HCG、CA-125、CEA、SA联合检测对卵巢恶性肿瘤诊断意义的探讨

目的：探讨AFP、β－HCG、CA－125、CEA、SA单项及联合检测对卵巢恶性肿瘤的诊断价值。方法：182例卵巢恶性肿瘤患者RIA、IRMA、分光光度计比色测出AFP、β－HCG、CA-125、CEA、SA血清中的含量。结果：恶性生殖细胞瘤AFP、β－HCG血清含量高于恶性上皮细胞瘤及性索－间质细胞瘤（P＜0．01）；恶性上皮细胞瘤CA－125高于恶性生殖细胞瘤及性索－间质细胞瘤（P＜0．01）；恶性卵巢肿瘤各细胞类型CEA、SA无显著性（P＞0．05）；CA－125Ⅲ、Ⅳ期阳性率（97．7％）高于Ⅰ期、Ⅱ期（63．5％）；5项指标联合检测阳性率87．6％，AFP、β－HCG、CA－125联合检测阳性率84．9％；CA－125对浆液性囊腺癌、低分化腺癌敏感性接近100％。结论：AFP、β－HCG、CA－125联合检测卵巢恶性肿瘤有较高敏感性、特异性和准确性。CEA、SA阳性率、特异性较低。     

血清CEA、CA72-4及CA125联合诊断胃癌术后腹膜转移

目的:探讨血清CEA、CA72-4及CA125联合诊断胃癌术后腹膜转移的价值,为临床诊治提供参考。方法:以我院于2015年11月至2016年11月因胃癌术后在本院复查且相关临床资料齐全患者120例作为研究对象并进行回顾性分析,按照有无腹膜转移分为转移组（38例）和无转移组（82例）。对比两组患者的血清CEA、CA72-4及CA125变化及单项诊断效能,并采用ROC曲线法对比三种肿瘤标志物的诊断效能。结果:转移组患者的血清CEA、CA72-4及CA125水平均高于无转移组,差异有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。三个单项指标比较,CA125灵敏度为73.3%,特异度为81.8%,均为三者最高,差异均有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。联合诊断比较,CEA+CA72-4+CA125联合检测的灵敏度最高（91.7%）,但特异度最低（41.7%）,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05)。结论:胃癌术后腹膜转移患者血清CEA、CA72-4及CA125均升高,且单项诊断CA125的灵敏度及特异度最高,而三项联合诊断的灵敏度最高,但特异度最低,值得临床参考。     

血清肿瘤标志物CEA、CA19-9和CA72-4在胃癌术后监测中的意义

目的研究血清肿瘤标志物CEA、CA19—9和CA72—4在胃癌术后复发、转移监测中的意义。方法采用电化学发光法检测228例手术后胃癌患者血清CEA、CA19—9和CA72—4含量;并结合临床及随访资料进行分析。结果胃癌术后复发、转移患者CEA、CA19—9和CA72—4的含量和阳性率均显著高于未发生复发、转移患者。术后复发、转移的胃癌患者血清CEA、CA19—9和CA72—4检测灵敏度和特异度分别为46．2％和94．7％,52．3％和97．4％,47．1％和90．6％。结论血清CEA、CA19—9和CA72-4升高与胃癌复发、转移密切相关,在术后随访过程中检测血清肿瘤标志物有助于早期诊断胃癌复发、转移。     

血清肿瘤标志物CEA、CA19-9和CA72-4在胃癌术后监测中的意义

目的 研究血清肿瘤标志物CEA、CA19-9和CA72-4在胃癌术后复发、转移监测中的意义.方法 采用电化学发光法检测228例手术后胃癌患者血清CEA、CA19-9和CA72-4含量;并结合临床及随访资料进行分析.结果 胃癌术后复发、转移患者CEA、CA19-9和CA72-4的含量和阳性率均显著高于未发生复发、转移患者.术后复发、转移的胃癌患者血清CEA、CA19-9和CA72-4检测灵敏度和特异度分别为46.2%和94.7%,52.3%和97.4%,47.1%和90.6%.结论 血清CEA、CA19-9和CA72-4升高与胃癌复发、转移密切相关,在术后随访过程中检测血清肿瘤标志物有助于早期诊断胃癌复发、转移.     

Applicative Value of Serum CA19-9, CEA,CA125 and CA242 in Diagnosis and Prognosis for Patients with Pancreatic Cancer Treated by Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Objective: To evaluate the application value of serum CA19-9, CEA, CA125 and CA242 in diagnosis andprognosis of pancreatic cancer cases treated with concurrent chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: 52patients with pancreatic cancer, 40 with benign pancreatic diseases and 40 healthy people were selected. Theelectrochemiluminescence immunoassay method was used for detecting levels of CA19-9, CEA and CA125, anda CanAg CA242 enzyme linked immunoassay kit for assessing the level of CA242. The Kaplan-Meier methodwas used for analyzing the prognostic factors of patients with pancreatic cancer. The Cox proportional hazardmodel was applied for analyzing the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidential interval (CI) for survival timeof patients with pancreatic cancer. Results: The levels of serum CA19-9, CEA, CA125 and CA242 in patientswith pancreatic cancer were significantly higher than those in patients with benign pancreatic diseases andhealthy people (P<0.001). The sensitivity of CA19-9 was the highest among these, followed by CA242, CA125and CEA. The specificity of CA242 is the highest, followed by CA125, CEA and CA19-9. The sensitivity andspecificity of joint detection of serum CA19-9, CEA, CA125and CA242 were 90.4% and 93.8%, obviouslyhigher than single detection of those markers in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. The median survival time of52 patients with pancreatic cancer was 10 months (95% CI7.389~12.611).. Patients with the increasing level ofserum CA19-9, CEA, CA125, CA242 had shorter survival times (P=0.047. 0.043, 0.0041, 0.029). COX regressionanalysis showed that CA19-9 was an independent prognostic factor for patients with pancreatic cancer (P=0.001,95%CI 2.591~38.243). Conclusions: The detection of serum tumor markers (CA19.9, CEA, CA125 and CA242)is conducive to the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and joint detection of tumor markers helps improve thediagnostic efficiency. Moreover, CA19-9 is an independent prognostic factor for patients with pancreatic cancer.     

Value of Combined Detection of Serum CEA,CA72-4, CA19-9 and TSGF in the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer

Background: To explore whether combined detection of serum tumor markers (CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9 andTSGF) improve the sensitivity and accuracy in the diagnosis of gastric cancer (GC). Materials and Methods: Anautomatic chemiluminescence immune analyzer with matched kits were used to determine the levels of serumCEA, CA72-4, CA19-9 and TSGF in 45 patients with gastric cancer (GC group), 40 patients with gastric benigndiseases (GBD group) hospitalized in the same period and 30 healthy people undergoing a physical examination.The values of those 4 tumor markers in the diagnosis of gastric cancer was analyzed. Results: The levels ofserum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9 and TSGF of the GC group were higher than those of the GBD group and healthyexamined people and the differences were significant (P<0.001). The area under receiver operating characteristic(ROC) curves for single detection of CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9 and TSGF in the diagnosis of GC was 0.833, 0.805,0.810 and 0.839, respectively. The optimal cutoff values for these 4 indices were 2.36 ng/mL, 3.06 U/mL, 5.72 U/mL and 60.7 U/mL, respectively. With combined detection of tumor markers, the diagnostic power of those 4indices was best, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.913 (95%CI 0.866~0.985), a sensitivity of 88.9% anda diagnostic accuracy of 90.4%. Conclusions: Combined detection of serum CEA, CA72-4, CA19-9 and TSGFincreases the sensitivity and accuracy in diagnosis of GC, so it can be regarded as the important means for earlydiagnosis.     

血清CEA、CA125及CA72-4在胃癌腹膜转移中的临床意义

背景与目的:胃癌腹膜转移多处于疾病终末期,但每种肿瘤标志物在胃癌腹膜转移中的临床意义仍不是很明确.该研究探讨血清肿瘤标志物CEA、CA125及CA72-4在胃癌腹膜转移中的诊断价值及其临床意义.方法:收集延边大学附属医院肿瘤科2008年1月—2013年12月间经影像学、手术和病理学等检查确诊、并接受静脉及腹腔灌注化疗的108例胃癌腹膜转移患者为研究对象,分别于确诊时、每次化疗前检测血清CEA、CA125及CA72-4,分析单独、2或3种肿瘤标志物同时检测在胃癌腹膜转移的诊断敏感性,并分析其与临床病理因素、化疗疗效及生存期之间的相关性.结果:在胃癌腹膜转移患者CEA、CA125和CA72-4的阳性率各为20.4%、46.3%和45.4%,联合CEA/CA125、CEA/CA72-4、CA125/CA72-4及CEA/CA125/CA72-4的阳性率分别为54.7%、52.8%、69.5%和79.6%,3种标志物联合检测明显优于单独检测(P<0.05).CEA、CA125和CA72-4水平均与ECOG分级存在相关性(P<0.05).CA125阳性与腹水有关(P<0.001).CA72-4阳性与卵巢转移相关(P<0.05).确诊时血清CEA、CA125和CA72-4阳性患者中位生存期短于CEA、CA125和CA72-4阴性的患者(P<0.05).在3周期化疗后3种肿瘤标志物较治疗前均下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).化疗后CA125下降与腹水量的减少有明显相关性(P<0.05).确诊时肿瘤标志物阳性患者经化疗3个周期后转为阴性的患者生存期明显延长(P<0.001).结论:联合检测血清CEA、CA125和CA72-4可明显提高胃癌腹膜转移的诊断率.     

Application of Joint Detection of AFP,CA19-9, CA125 and CEA in Identification and Diagnosis of Cholangiocarcinoma

Objective: To explore the application of joint detection of serum AFP, CA19-9, CA125 and CEA in identificationand diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma (CC). Materials and Methods: The levels of serum AFP, CA19-9, CA125and CEA of both 30 patients with CC and 30 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were assessed.Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic effects of single and jointdetection of those 4 kinds of tumor markers for CC. Results: The levels of serum CA19-9, CA125 and CEAin CC patients were higher than that in HCC patients,whereas that of serum AFP was significantly lower s.The area under ROC curve of single detection of serum AFP, CA19-9, CA125 and CEA were 0.05, 0.86, 0.84and 0.83, with the optimal cutoff values of 15.4 ng/ml, 125.1 U/ml, 95.7 U/ml and 25.9 ng/ml, correspondingly,and the percentage correct single diagnosis was <79%. With joint detection, the diagnostic effect of combinedAFP, CA19-9, CA125 and CEA was the highest, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.94 (95%CI 0.88~0.99).Conclusions: Single detection of serum CA19-9, CA125 and EA is not meaningful. The sensitivity, specificity,the rate of correct diagnosis and the area under ROC curve of joint detection of AFP, CA19-9, CA125 and CEAare highest, indicating that the joint detection of these 4 tumor markers is of great importance in the diagnosisof CC.     

炎性介质ＣＲＰ和ＳＡＡ与肿瘤标记物ＣＥＡ、ＣＡ１９-９和ＣＡ７２-４术前联合评估结直肠癌

目的：探讨运用炎性介质Ｃ反应蛋白（ＣＲＰ）、血清淀粉样蛋白Ａ（ＳＡＡ）与肿瘤标记物ＣＥＡ、ＣＡ１９-９、ＣＡ７２-４术前联合评估结直肠肿瘤分期的价值。方法：纳入１３０例结直肠癌患者,于术前３天测定血清ＣＥＡ、ＣＡ１９-９、ＣＡ７２-４、ＣＲＰ和ＳＡＡ的水平,并与术后病理分期进行比较。结果：术前ＳＡＡ与ＣＲＰ、ＣＥＡ有相关性,相关系数分别为ｒ＝０.６４７（Ｐ＝０.０００）和ｒ＝０.２９５（Ｐ＝０.００１）;ＣＲＰ（Ｐ＝０.０２１）、ＳＡＡ（Ｐ＝０.０３６）、ＣＡ１９-９（Ｐ＝０.０１７）在不同的ＴＮＭ分期之间差异有统计学意义;建立ＣＲＰ、ＳＡＡ和ＣＡ１９. ９诊断Ⅱ ～Ⅳ期结直肠癌的ＲＯＣ曲线,ＳＡＡ的曲线下面积（ＡＵＣ）为０.６７４（Ｐ＝０００５）,ＣＡ１９.９的ＡＵＣ为０.６６４（Ｐ＝０００８）,ＣＲＰ的ＡＵＣ没有统计学意义;以血清ＳＡＡ值≥２.６６５ｍｇ／Ｌ为阳性,或ＣＡ１９-９值≥８.７０５Ｕ／ｍｌ为阳性联合诊断Ⅱ ～Ⅳ期结直肠癌的准确度为７５.６％,敏感度为８８.３％,特异度为３４.５％。结论：炎性介质和肿瘤标记物具有相关性,联合检测ＳＡＡ和ＣＡ１９-９筛选Ⅱ ～Ⅳ期结直肠癌患者具有较高价值。     

血清脂联素、CEA、CA19-9、CA72-4联合检测在胃癌早期筛查中的临床价值分析

目的:探讨血清脂联素、CEA、CA19-9、CA72-4联合检测在胃癌早期筛查中的临床价值。方法:选取首次确诊的早期胃癌患者60例,胃癌患者再根据幽门螺杆菌是否感染分为感染组32例与未感染组28例;胃良性疾病组患者100例;健康对照组110例。采用化学发光法检测CEA、CA19-9、CA72-4水平,ELISA检测血清脂联素水平,幽门螺杆菌检测采用C14呼气试验,比较不同分组间各指标的差异。结果:胃癌组血清CEA、CA19-9、CA72-4水平均高于胃良性疾病组和健康对照组(P<0.01),血清脂联素水平显著低于胃良性疾病组和健康对照组(P<0.01);胃癌患者幽门螺杆菌感染时,血清CEA、CA19-9、CA72-4水平明显高于未感染组(P<0.01),感染组患者血清脂联素水平与未感染组比较,无显著性差异(P>0.05);四项联合检测胃癌灵敏度最高,达96.67,特异度为98.10%,阳性预测值为93.55%,阴性预测值为99.04%,阳性似然比为50.75、阴性似然比为0.03,约登指数达0.95,ROC曲线下面积为0.955。结论:胃癌早期患者血清脂联素水平不受幽门螺杆菌感染的影响,四项联合检测可明显提高检测的灵敏度和特异度,对胃癌患者早期筛查具有较高的临床应用价值。     

联合检测CA125 CA199和CEA对卵巢癌诊断价值的Meta分析

  目的  评价联合检测血清CA125、CA199、CEA在卵巢癌诊断中的价值。  方法  计算机检索Pubmed、CBMdisc、CNKI、维普等数据库, 收集关于卵巢癌诊断中联合检测CA125、CA199、CEA的文献。采用Meta-DiSc 14.0、Stata10.0进行Meta分析。  结果  按照统一的纳入标准和排除标准获得12篇文献。结果显示在卵巢癌诊断中, 联合检测CA 125、CA199、CEA的灵敏度(SE)、特异度(SP)、诊断比值比(DOR)、SROC曲线下面积(AUC)、Q指数分别为0.90(0.88~0.93)、0.83(0.80~0.86)、39.75(22.58~69.97)、0.953、0.895。单独检测CA125的SE、SP、DOR、AUC、Q指数分别为0.73(0.69~0.77)、0.88(0.86~0.91)、17.45(9.95~30.48)、0.804、0.739。两种检测方式的诊断效能比较差异有统计学意义(Z=4.859, P < 0.05)。  结论  卵巢癌的临床辅助诊断中, 与单独检测CA125比较, 联合检测CA125、CA199、CEA的判别能力较强、准确率较高, 可提高诊断效能。