Pallidal surgery for the treatment of primary generalized dystonia: long-term follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To describe the results and long-term follow-up after functional surgery of the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) in 10 patients with primary generalized dystonia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine of the 10 patients were positive for the DYT1 gene mutation. Bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the GPi was performed in three cases, bilateral pallidotomy in two, and combined surgery (unilateral GPi lesion with contralateral stimulation) in the remaining five. All patients were evaluated with the Burke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia scale (BFMDS) before, immediately after surgery, at 3 weeks, 3 and 6 months and then yearly. Follow up time ranged from 15 to 105 months (mean: 66.1 months) with six patients having more than 6 years follow up. RESULTS: All patients improved after surgery. All patients with unilateral or bilateral DBS experienced an immediate improvement before starting stimulation. The magnitude of this initial micro lesion effect did not predict the magnitude of the long-term benefit of DBS. The mean decrease in the in the BFMDS was 34%, 55%, and 65% in the movement scale; and 32%, 48%, and 49% in the disability scale for patients with bilateral pallidal DBS, combined unilateral DBS and contralateral pallidotomy, and bilateral pallidotomy, respectively. Worsening of dystonia after a plateau of sustained benefit was observed in three patients. Two patients required multiple pallidal surgeries. Adverse events included: permanent anarthria (1), misplacement of the electrode requiring further surgery (2), scalp infection (1), and hardware related problems (3). CONCLUSIONS: This long-term follow up study confirms the beneficial effect of pallidal DBS or pallidotomy in primary generalized dystonia. In addition, our results extent previous observations by showing that, in these patients, (1) the microlesion effect of DBS is not predictive of long-term benefit; (2) combined DBS with contralateral pallidotomy appears to be more effective than bilateral pallidal DBS; and (3) dystonia can reappear after an initial good response during long term follow up.     

Thalamic, pallidal, or subthalamic surgery for Parkinson's disease?

Levodopa is a highly effective treatment of all motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. However, long-term treatment with levodopa can lead to motor fluctuations and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Motor side effects can become so disabling as to warrant surgical treatment. Both ablative surgery and deep brain stimulation (DBS) for Parkinson's disease (PD) can be performed in different target areas. Thalamic surgery mainly improves tremor, and to a lesser extent also rigidity and dyskinesias, whereas pallidal and subthalamic nucleus surgery improves all motor symptoms and levodopa-induced dyskinesias. The efficacy and safety of unilateral pallidotomy is well established. DBS has a lower morbidity and is safe enough to be performed bilaterally. The subthalamic nucleus (STN) presently seems to be the most promising target for DBS in advanced stage PD.     

刺激术和毁损术在双侧立体定向手术治疗帕金森病中的比较

目的比较脑深部刺激术和毁损术在双侧立体定向手术治疗帕金森病中的优缺点。方法69例帕金森病病人进行了双侧手术治疗,其中同期双侧丘脑底核(STN)脑深部刺激术(DBS)11例,同期一侧苍白球腹后部毁损术(PVP),另一侧STNDBS3例,分期一侧PVP或腹中间核(Vim)毁损术、另一侧STN或VimDBS9例;分期双侧PVP或Vim毁损术41例,同期双侧PVP5例。平均随访9.3个月。结果UPDRS评分显示刺激术和毁损术均能显著改善对侧肢体震颤、僵硬和运动迟缓症状,双侧刺激术还能改善步态和姿势症状,但双侧毁损术可加重语言、吞咽及流涎等症状,并发症较高。结论双侧DBS是具有双侧症状的帕金森病病人手术治疗的最佳术式,双侧毁损术并发症较高,应严格慎重采用。     

Staged lesions through implanted deep brain stimulating electrodes: a new surgical procedure for treating tremor or dyskinesias.

Thalamotomy and pallidotomy have been shown to have some efficacy for treating some movement disorders such as disabling tremor or parkinsonian levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID). Compared to continuous deep brain stimulation (DBS), this surgical procedure has the disadvantage of irreversibility and a lack of adaptability. Making a lesion involves a risk of inducing permanent side effects, especially if the lesion is large, or of observing a resurgence of the symptoms if the lesion is too small. We performed unilateral pallidotomy in one patient suffering from LID and unilateral thalamotomy in two patients suffering from tremor through the lead classically used for DBS. The technique of lead implantation was similar to that used for DBS treatment but, instead of connecting the lead to a pulse generator, it was left in place and used to make a radiofrequency lesion. This technique allowed the lesion to be kept as small as possible, thereby minimizing the risk of permanent side effects and made possible to extend the lesion if the symptoms reappeared. One lesioning session was enough to relieve tremor in the two patients treated by thalamotomy; three lesioning sessions over a 7-month period were required to relieve drug-induced dyskinesias in the patient treated by pallidotomy. In all 3 patients, disabling symptoms were still relieved without any permanent side effects 6 months after the last lesion was performed.     

Long term outcome of unilateral pallidotomy: follow up of 15 patients for 3 years

OBJECTIVES: With the advent of new antiparkinsonian drug therapy and promising results from subthalamic and pallidal stimulation, this study evaluated the long term efficacy of unilateral pallidotomy, a technique which has gained popularity over the past decade for the management of advanced Parkinson's disease. METHODS: The 15 patients reported here are part of the original cohort of 24 patients who underwent posteroventral pallidotomy for motor fluctuations and disabling dyskinesias 3 years ago as part of a prospective study. Evaluation scales included the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale, the Goetz dyskinesia scale, and the Purdue pegboard test. RESULTS: When compared with the prepallidotomy scores, the reduction in the limb dyskinesias and off state tremor scores persisted on the side contralateral to pallidotomy at the end of 3 years (dyskinesias were reduced by 64% (p<0.01) and tremor by 63% (p<0.05). Other measures tended to deteriorate. The dosage of antiparkinsonian medications did not change significantly from 3 months prepallidotomy to 3 years postpallidotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although unilateral pallidotomy is useful in controlling the contralateral dyskinesias and tremor 3 years after surgery, all other early benefits disappear and activities of daily living continue to worsen.     

Unilateral pallidotomy in advanced Parkinson's disease: a retrospective study of 26 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of unilateral pallidotomy in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients with PD and disabling dyskinesias, painful and/or disabling dystonia, and/or pain as part of PD despite optimal pharmacotherapy underwent unilateral pallidotomy. For assessment, the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS; part II and III), Hoehn and Yahr staging, the Schwab and England scale, a Dyskinesia Rating Scale, and timed tests were used. Assessment was performed in defined "off' and "on," and on average 2 months before and 7.5 months after the unilateral pallidotomy. Adverse effects were classified as transient or permanent and as major or minor. RESULTS: In the "off' phase, the median UPDRS II score improved from 26.5 to 20.5 (23%) and the median UPDRS III score improved from 47.5 to 33.0 (31%). In the "on" phase, dyskinesias contralateral to the side of the procedure improved with 88% ipsilateral dyskinesias improved only temporarily, and the total UPDRS II and III scores remained unchanged. Thirteen patients had transient adverse effects, three patients had permanent, and two patients had a combination of transient and permanent adverse effects. The transient adverse effects in two patients were classified as major. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic unilateral pallidotomy can improve symptoms and disability in the "off' phase. In the "on" phase, dyskinesias disappeared at the side contralateral to the procedure. Permanent minor complications of pallidotomy occurred in 19% of the patients.     

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation for parkinson's disease after successful pallidotomy: clinical and electrophysiological observations.

Unilateral pallidotomy is an effective treatment for contralateral parkinsonism and dyskinesia, yet symptoms progress in many patients. Little is known about whether such patients obtain a useful response to subsequent bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS). Changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Motor and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scores, medication requirements, and dyskinesias were measured. Clinical outcomes were compared to patients with de novo STN DBS. Neuronal recordings were performed. STN DBS resulted in a significant reduction in UPDRS Motor scores (42.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 26.9-57.4; P = 0.03), comparable with de novo STN DBS surgery (41%; 95% CI, 26-46%; P < 0.001). There was also less change in dyskinesia duration and disability scores (P = 0.017, 0.005). There were no side-to-side differences clinically or in the STN neuronal firing rates and patterns. Bilateral STN DBS is safe and efficacious in improving motor symptoms in patients with prior pallidotomy.     

Comparison of Contralateral Pallidotomy vs. Pallidal Stimulation After Prior Unilateral Pallidotomy for Parkinson’s Disease

Objectives: Pallidal stimulation and pallidotomy are known to improve the symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, it is not known which modality produces greater benefit in patients who have already undergone unilateral pallidotomy. It is also suggested that the original pallidal surgery provides a greater benefit than subsequent pallidal surgery. The aim of this study was to analyze which modality produced greater PD symptom improvement in patients with a prior pallidotomy and whether the chronological order of the pallidal surgery influenced the size of the improvement. Methods: Five patients who had undergone a prior unilateral pallidotomy for PD were studied. Because of ongoing Parkinsonian symptoms, all patients subsequently underwent contralateral pallidal surgery, either a further pallidotomy or pallidal stimulation. All surgeries were performed by a single functional neurosurgeon and the patients prospectively assessed and scored at routine follow‐ups. Paired‐sample t‐tests were used to detect differences in outcomes after first and second surgeries. Results: Two patients underwent pallidal stimulation and three underwent a second pallidotomy. Mean follow‐up was 13.5 months and 12.3 months, respectively. Greater percentage improvements in the majority of scores were found after pallidal stimulation compared with a second pallidotomy, namely Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II off (25.22% vs. −3.27%), UPDRS III off (36.15% vs. 5.21%), rigidity (58.34% vs. 11.54%), tremor (5.56% vs. −30.48%), bradykinesia (48.55% vs. −2.23%), gait composite (16.52% vs. −51.79%), dyskinesia duration (83.33% vs. 66.67%), dyskinesia disability (100% vs. 66.67%), speech (10% vs. −50%), and the proportion of the day spent in the “off” state (50% vs. 25%). Comparing outcomes after the first surgery to those after the second surgery, statistical differences were found in dyskinesia duration improvement and ipsilateral dyskinesia improvement after the second surgery (p < 0.004 and p = 0.021, respectively). Conclusions: Pallidal stimulation produced greater symptom improvement than a second pallidotomy and subsequent surgery did not produce inferior results to the original pallidal surgery.     

Comparative effects of unilateral and bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of unilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) with bilateral STN DBS in advanced PD. METHODS: Our initial 10 consecutive patients with medication-refractory motor fluctuations and levodopa-induced dyskinesias undergoing chronic bilateral STN DBS underwent a standardized evaluation of unilateral and bilateral STN DBS in the medication-off state 6 to 18 months after electrode implantation. RESULTS: Bilateral STN DBS improved the mean total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score by 54%, whereas unilateral stimulation improved motor scores only 23%. Unilateral STN DBS improved postural stability and gait 14%, other axial motor features 19%, and overall parkinsonism in limbs contralateral to stimulation by 46%, including an 86% improvement in contralateral tremor. However, bilateral STN DBS resulted in greater improvement in each of these domains, including limb function, i.e., the reduction in scores from the limbs on one side was greater with bilateral than with unilateral stimulation of the contralateral STN. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral STN DBS improves parkinsonism considerably more than unilateral STN DBS; bilateral simultaneous electrode implantation may be the most appropriate surgical option for patients with significant bilateral disability. Unilateral STN DBS results in moderate improvement in all aspects of off-period parkinsonism and improves tremor as much as is typically reported with DBS of the ventral intermedius nucleus of the thalamus (Vim). For this reason, STN DBS may be a more appropriate choice than Vim DBS or thalamotomy for parkinsonian tremor. Some patients with highly asymmetric tremor-dominant PD might be appropriately treated with unilateral instead of bilateral STN DBS.     

Motor and cognitive sequelae of unilateral pallidotomy in intractable Parkinson's Disease: electronic measurement of motor steadiness is a useful outcome measure

This study examined the short-term motor and cognitive sequelae of unilateral posterolateral pallidotomy for patients with intractable Parkinson's Disease (PD). Unique to this study was the inclusion of electronic motor steadiness instrumentation among pre- and postsurgical assessment procedures. Fifteen PD patients underwent right-sided surgery and 10 underwent left-sided surgery; patients were evaluated 1 month presurgery and approximately 3 months postsurgery. Motorically, there were no significant changes in grooved pegboard or maze-drawing performances, but patients evidenced significantly improved steadiness, particularly in the hand contralateral to the side of surgery. Cognitively, there were no significant decrements on postsurgery composite variables comprised of well-known tests of attention, executive functioning, delayed memory or recognition memory; these findings were similar for patients with either left- or right-sided surgery. There was, however, a significant change in language abilities among a subset of patients. This change was evident in the decline in verbal fluency in PD patients who underwent left-sided pallidotomy, a finding that has consistently emerged in pallidotomy outcome studies. This decline is discussed in terms of evidence that suggests that the basal ganglia consist of several separate, but parallel circuits, some of which are important for cognition.     

Prior pallidotomy reduces and modifies neuronal activity in the subthalamic nucleus of Parkinson's disease patients

Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with prior radio-frequency lesions in the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi, pallidotomy), whose symptoms have deteriorated, may be candidates for further invasive treatment such as subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS). Six patients with prior pallidotomy (five unilaterally; one bilaterally) underwent bilateral STN DBS. The microelectrode recordings (MERs, used intraoperatively for STN verification), ipsilateral and contralateral to pallidotomy, and MERs from 11 matched PD patients who underwent bilateral STN DBS without prior pallidotomy were compared. For each trajectory, average, variance and mean successive difference (MSD, a measure of irregularity) of the root mean square (RMS) of the STN MER were calculated. The RMS in trajectories ipsilateral to pallidotomy showed significant reduction of the mean average and MSD of STN activity when compared with trajectories from patients without prior pallidotomy. The RMS parameters contralateral to pallidotomy tend to lie between those ipsilateral to pallidotomy and those without prior pallidotomy. The average STN power spectral density of oscillatory activity was notably lower ipsilateral to pallidotomy than contralateral, or without prior pallidotomy. The finding that pallidotomy reduces STN activity and changes firing characteristics, in conjunction with the effectiveness of STN DBS despite prior pallidotomy, calls for reappraisal and modification of the current model of the basal ganglia (BG) cortical network. It highlights the critical role of direct projections from the BG to brain-stem structures and suggests a possible GPi–STN reciprocal positive-feedback mechanism.     

脑深部电刺激术治疗毁损术后帕金森病的疗效

目的 探讨脑深部电刺激术（DBS）治疗苍白球或丘脑毁损术后帕金森病的疗效与安全性。方法 回顾性分析2013年1月至2021年3月毁损术后复发或出现新症状而行DBS治疗的33例帕金森病的临床资料。DBS后6个月,采用统一帕金森病量表（UPDRS）运动功能（UPDRS Ⅲ）评分和生活能力（UPDRS Ⅱ）评分、H-Y分期、简明精神量表评分（MMSE）以及左旋多巴等效日剂量（LEDD）评估疗效以及用药情况;记录刺激频率、脉宽、电压、阻抗,并计算刺激能量。结果 术后随访6个月~8.25年,未出现言语障碍、眼球活动障碍、偏瘫、颅内出血或梗死、癫痫发作、颅内感染病例,无硬件故障;5例因电池耗竭行脉冲发生器置换术。DBS后6个月,UPDRS Ⅲ评分、UPDRS Ⅱ评分、H-Y分期、LEDD均较术前明显降低（P<0.05）,而MMSE评分较术前无明显变化（P>0.05）;和非毁损侧相比,毁损侧肢体震颤评分改善率明显增高（P<0.05）,但僵硬评分改善率、运动迟缓评分改善率均无明显变化（P>0.05）;和非毁损侧相比,毁损侧刺激电压和刺激能量明显降低（P<0.05）,但刺激频率、脉宽和阻抗无明显变化（P>0.05）。结论 PD病人神经核团毁损术后复发或出现新症状,DBS是安全、有效的,毁损侧DBS后电刺激所需能量及电压更低。     

Four year follow-up study after unilateral pallidotomy in advanced Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND: Pallidotomy is widely accepted as a treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have disabling symptoms that are inadequately controlled with pharmacotherapy. There are, however, only a few studies, with a small number of patients, showing evidence after prolonged periods of time about the clinical outcome after pallidotomy. METHODS: We have conducted a four-year follow-up study of 23 patients with PD who had undergone unilateral pallidotomy. Six patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 17 were evaluated before surgery and at three months, one year, and four years after surgery, following standard protocols. RESULTS: At four years, patients still showed significant amelioration in contralateral and axial dyskinesias and off-period contralateral parkinsonian signs. Total motor UPDRS and Activities of Daily Living scores also remained improved four years after surgery. Ipsilateral and axial parkinsonian symptoms and Hoehn & Yahr and Schwab & England scales were not significantly changed from baseline values. The initial beneficial effects on motor fluctuations were not maintained at last visit. All patients considered themselves to be improved with respect to their clinical condition before surgery in a clinical global impression estimation done at the four-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Unilateral pallidotomy can provide sustained improvement of contralateral parkinsonism and dyskinesias during at least four years. Early benefits observed in axial symptoms and motor fluctuations wane with time. On period akinesia worsened significantly in the limbs contralateral to pallidotomy after four years.     

Motor and Cognitive Sequelae of Unilateral Pallidotomy in Intractable Parkinson's Disease: Electronic Measurement of Motor Steadiness is a Useful Outcome Measure

This study examined the short-term motor and cognitive sequelae of unilateral posterolateral pallidotomy for patients with intractable Parkinson's Disease (PD). Unique to this study was the inclusion of electronic motor steadiness instrumentation among pre- and postsurgical assessment procedures. Fifteen PD patients underwent right-sided surgery and 10 underwent left-sided surgery; patients were evaluated 1 month presurgery and approximately 3 months postsurgery. Motorically, there were no significant changes in grooved pegboard or maze-drawing performances, but patients evidenced significantly improved steadiness, particularly in the hand contralateral to the side of surgery. Cognitively, there were no significant decrements on postsurgery composite variables comprised of well-known tests of attention, executive functioning, delayed memory or recognition memory; these findings were similar for patients with either left- or right-sided surgery. There was, however, a significant change in language abilities among a subset of patients. This change was evident in the decline in verbal fluency in PD patients who underwent left-sided pallidotomy, a finding that has consistently emerged in pallidotomy outcome studies. This decline is discussed in terms of evidence that suggests that the basal ganglia consist of several separate, but parallel circuits, some of which are important for cognition.     

Subthalamic deep brain stimulation in patients with a previous pallidotomy.

The safety and efficacy of subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients who have had a previous unilateral pallidotomy is not clear. We identified 10 patients (9 male) at the Baylor College of Medicine Parkinson's Disease Center who underwent STN DBS after prior unilateral pallidotomy. Demographics, efficacy as determined by off Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part III scores, and levodopa equivalent dosing were analyzed. We then compared these to an age- and sex-matched group of 25 DBS patients who had no prior pallidotomy. After their initial pallidotomy (mean age, 51.8 +/- 10.8 years), the mean UPDRS motor off medicine scores improved from 51.3 +/- 14.3 to 34.9 +/- 12.8, and the UPDRS dyskinesia score improved from 1.8 +/- 1.0 to 0.8 +/- 0.7. Their STN DBS off UPDRS motor scores (mean age, 56.0 +/- 10.2 years) improved by 16.0% from 53.1 +/- 9.7 (range, 42-68) to 44.6 +/- 11.1 (range, 25-67). In contrast, the UPDRS off motor scores in a control group of 25 DBS patients improved by 49.9%, from 49.7 +/- 11.1 to 25.7 +/- 18.9, (16.0% vs. 49.9%; P < 0.001). Changes in UPDRS dyskinesia scores were similar in both groups. AE thought to be related to the STN DBS following pallidotomy included worse dysarthria (three) and worse balance (two). STN DBS patients with prior pallidotomy had less improvement in UPDRS off motor score compared to other STN DBS patients, despite relatively good outcomes immediately after their pallidotomy. This may be partially due to a selection bias, but it may also indicate that prior pallidotomy is a negative predictor of outcome of STN DBS and should be considered in patient selection.     

Unilateral pallidotomy in PD: a controlled study of cognitive and behavioral effects. The Netherlands Pallidotomy Study (NEPAS) group

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether unilateral pallidotomy affects cognitive and behavioral functioning. METHODS: At baseline and after 6 months we assessed neuropsychological functioning in 35 patients with advanced PD. After baseline examination, patients were randomized to pallidotomy within 1 month (6 left-sided, 13 right-sided) or to pallidotomy after follow-up assessment 6 months later (n = 16; control group). We performed neuropsychological tests of language, visuospatial function, memory, attention, and executive functions. Self ratings and proxy ratings of memory problems and dysexecutive symptoms were also collected. RESULTS: No significant differences over time were found between pallidotomy and control groups, with the exception of a decrease of verbal fluency in the left-sided pallidotomy group. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral pallidotomy is relatively safe with respect to cognition and behavior. Left-sided pallidotomy may lead to minor deterioration in verbal fluency. The sample size of this study is too small, however, to rule out the possibility of infrequent but clinically important side effects.     

脑深部电刺激对帕金森病二次手术的临床应用价值

目的探讨帕金森病(Parkinson'sdisease,PD)毁损术后再行脑深部电刺激术(deepbrainstimulation,DBS)的可行性、靶点选择、术中电生理学特点和治疗结果。方法应用MRI和微电极记录技术进行靶点定位,对13例毁损术后的PD患者行DBS手术,其中7例曾行单侧苍白球毁损术(posteroventralpallidotomy,PVP),5例曾行单侧丘脑毁损术,1例曾行双侧丘脑及左侧苍白球毁损术。DBS的靶点包括单侧丘脑底核(subthalamicnucleus,STN)6例,单侧丘脑腹中间核(ventralintermediatnucleus,Vim)1例,双侧STN4例,一侧STN及对侧苍白球(globuspallidusinternus,Gpi)2例。结果DBS对毁损术后的PD患者症状有不同程度的改善,其中单侧毁损术后行双侧DBS效果最明显。术后3个月的UPDRS运动及ADL评分较术前明显减少(P<0.05或0.01),美多巴的用量明显减少(P<0.05),无新的手术合并症。结论曾行毁损术的PD患者如面临二次手术,可以选择DBS手术,以双侧STN的DBS效果最好,并可减少药物用量,不加重原有的术后并发症。     

Thalamic deep brain stimulation: comparison between unilateral and bilateral placement

BACKGROUND: Unilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) is accepted as an effective treatment for essential tremor (ET) and the tremor of Parkinson disease (PD). There are, however, relatively little data concerning bilateral thalamic DBS and no thorough comparisons between the 2 methods. METHODS: To assess the relative benefit of a staged second contralateral DBS placement in patients with PD and ET, we compared preoperative baseline assessments with those at 3 months after the initial implantation, and again at 3 months after the second contralateral implantation. The assessments included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale for patients with PD (n = 8) and a modified Unified Tremor Rating Assessment for patients with ET (n = 13). The design included open and blinded (unknown activation status) assessments. RESULTS: Overall, after the second implantation, all specific measures assessing tremor contralateral to that side improved in patients with PD and ET, generally without sacrificing those contralateral to the first side implantation. Midline tremors (face and head) improved only after the second side implantation. In patients with ET, functional and subjective scores tended to further improve after the second placement; however, patients with PD had less subjective improvement. Hand tremor scores in patients with ET randomized to "on" stimulation improved from 6.7 +/- 0.9 to 1.3 +/- 1.2 (P<.005). The scores of patients with PD randomized to on stimulation improved from 9.3 +/- 1.0 to 1.0 +/- 0.5. (Data are given as mean +/- SD.) Tremor scores did not change from baseline in those patients randomized to "off" stimulation in either group. Adverse events related to stimulation increased after the second implantation in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral thalamic DBS is more effective than unilateral DBS at controlling bilateral appendicular and midline tremors of ET and PD. Despite this, overall functional disability only improved in patients with ET, possibly secondary to more problematic adverse events in patients with PD, especially balance problems. Bilateral DBS should be considered when unilateral DBS does not offer satisfactory benefit, especially in patients with ET.     

Pallidal deep brain stimulation in patients with cervical dystonia and severe cervical dyskinesias with cervical myelopathy

OBJECTIVES: Surgical treatment of complex cervical dystonia and of cervical dyskinesias associated with cervical myelopathy is challenging. In this prospective study, the long term effect of chronic pallidal stimulation in cervical dystonia and on combining the technique with spinal surgery in patients with severe cervical dyskinesias and secondary cervical myelopathy is described. METHODS: Eight patients with a history of chronic dystonia who did not achieve adequate benefit from medical treatment or botulinum toxin injection participated in the study. Five patients had complex cervical dystonia with tonic postures and phasic movements. Three patients had rapidly progressive cervical myelopathy secondary to severe cervical dyskinesias and dystonia in the context of a generalised movement disorder. Quadripolar electrodes were implanted in the posteroventral lateral globus pallidus internus with stereotactic CT and microelectrode guidance. In the three patients with secondary cervical myelopathy, spinal surgery was performed within a few weeks and included multilevel laminectomies and a four level cervical corporectomy with spinal stabilisation. RESULTS: Improvement of the movement disorder was noted early after pallidal surgery, but the full benefit could be appreciated only with a delay of several months during chronic stimulation. Three months after surgery, patients with cervical dystonia had improved by 38% in the severity score, by 54% in the disability score, and by 38% in the pain score of a modified version of the Toronto western spasmodic torticollis rating scale. At a mean follow up of 20 months, the severity score had improved by 63%, the disability score by 69%, and the pain score by 50% compared with preoperatively. There was also sustained amelioration of cervical dyskinesias in the three patients who underwent spinal surgery. Lead fractures occurred in two patients. The mean amplitude needed for chronic deep brain stimulation was 3.8 V at a mean pulse width of 210 micros, which is higher than that used for pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic pallidal stimulation is effective for complex cervical dystonia and it is a useful adjunct in patients with cervical dyskinesias and secondary cervical myelopathy who undergo spinal surgery.     

Long-term follow-up of thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential and parkinsonian tremor

Thirteen consecutive patients with thalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) were examined serially for 3 to 5 years. Initially, all demonstrated at least 50% improvement in contralateral tremor. At last follow-up, three of eight patients with Parkinson disease no longer used DBS because tremor had markedly improved, and for two, motor fluctuations and levodopa-induced dyskinesias became the major disability, with tremor less troublesome. Two of five patients with essential tremor had contralateral tremor improvement after ongoing stimulation for 2 years; two developed marked tolerance to DBS.