A Phase I Study of Paclitaxel and Cyclophosphamide in Recurrent Adenocarcinoma of the Ovary

We have conducted a disease specific phase I study of paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide in recurrent adenocarcinoma of the ovary. This was done to take advantage of the cellular and molecular synergism between paclitaxel and DNA-damaging agents, with the hope of avoiding paclitaxel–cisplatin toxicities. Paclitaxel was given as a 24-hr CIVI, after which cyclophosphamide was given as a 60-min infusion. Cycles of therapy were repeated every 3 weeks; and granulocyte colony-simulating factor (G-CSF) was given in a “flexible” dosing fashion. Starting doses were 170 mg/m²paclitaxel and 750 mg/m²cyclophosphamide. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was seen at the doses of 250 mg/m²paclitaxel and 1250 mg/m²cyclophosphamide. DLT was cumulative thrombocytopenia. There were six nonhematologic grade 3 or 4 toxicities experienced in the study. Eleven of 20 evaluable patients (55%) have achieved an objective response (4 CCR;7 PR). Three of four CCRs were confirmed by negative findings at peritoneoscopy. The median number of prior therapies was 2 (range 1–4) and 17 individuals had platinum-refractory disease. We conclude that paclitaxel followed by cyclophosphamide is an active combination in recurrent ovarian cancer and that further study is needed to determine if this combination is truly better than paclitaxel alone.     

Phase I feasibility study of intraperitoneal cisplatin and intravenous paclitaxel followed by intraperitoneal paclitaxel in untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma: a gynecologic oncology group study

Purpose

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has shown a survival advantage over intravenous chemotherapy for women with newly diagnosed optimally debulked epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma. However, significant toxicity has limited its acceptance. In an effort to reduce toxicity, the Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a Phase I study to evaluate the feasibility of day 1 intravenous (IV) paclitaxel and intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin followed by day 8 IP paclitaxel on an every 21-day cycle.

Methods

Patients with Stage IIB-IV epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal carcinomas or carcinosarcoma received paclitaxel 135 mg/m² IV over 3 h followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m² IP on day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² IP on day 8 of a 21 day cycle with 6 cycles planned. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as febrile neutropenia or dose-delay of greater than 2 weeks due to failure to recover counts, or Grade 3–5 non-hematologic toxicity occurring within the first 4 cycles of treatment.

Results

Twenty of 23 patients enrolled were evaluable and nineteen (95%) completed all six cycles of therapy. Three patients experienced a DLT consisting of infection with normal absolute neutrophil count, grade 3 hyperglycemia, and grade 4 abdominal pain.

Conclusions

This modified IP regimen which administers both IV paclitaxel and IP cisplatin on day one, followed by IP paclitaxel on day eight, of a twenty-one day cycle appears feasible and is an attractive alternative to the intraperitoneal treatment regimen administered in GOG-0172.     

Phase I trial of escalating doses of topotecan in combination with a fixed dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in women with müllerian malignancies

Background. Topotecan and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) interact with topoisomerase I and II (topo I and II), respectively, with schedule dependent, and potentially synergistic cytotoxicity.Objectives. Define dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan delivered by 72-h infusion administered immediately after Doxil delivered at a fixed dose (30 mg/m²) in a cohort of women with recurrent müllerian malignancies.Methods. Topotecan dose was escalated from 0.5 mg/m²/day for 3 days in 0.2 mg/m²/day increments with treatment repeated every 21 days. Eligibility criteria required ECOG ≤2 and no more than four prior lines of chemotherapy. No dose reductions were allowed in the first two cycles to allow evaluation of cutaneous toxicity.Results. Between November 2000 and August 2002, 18 patients were enrolled. Median age 59 (40–71) years. Patients received a median 1 (1–6) cycles of chemotherapy, with 39 cycles of treatment delivered at DL 1. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 12 for response. At dose level 2, dose-limiting toxicity consisted of nausea and vomiting, mucositis, cutaneous toxicity, and neutropenia. There was no clinically significant cardiac toxicity. There were no radiologically confirmed partial responses.Conclusions. Doxil 30 mg/m² and topotecan 0.5 mg/m²/day by 72-h infusion (total dose 1.5 mg/m²), although a rational combination of cytotoxic therapies, have limited clinical activity.     

Prospective treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma with cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide

Both single-agent cisplatin and the combination of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide demonstrated moderate activity against endometrial carcinoma in earlier salvage trials. Since January 1979, 102 patients with advanced primary (n = 42) or recurrent (n = 60) endometrial carcinoma were prospectively treated with cisplatin (50 mg/m²), doxorubicin (50 mg/m²), and cyclophos-phamide (500 mg/m²) (PAC). PAC was administered monthly until disease progression or toxicity precluded additional therapy. Patients received a median of five treatment cycles (range 1–13). Of the 87 patients with measurable disease, 12 had a complete clinical response, while 27 had a partial clinical response, for an overall objective response rate of 45%. No differences in response rates between primary and recurrent disease patients were noted. Median time to response was 2.5 months with a median response duration of 4.8 months. Nonresponders included 33 patients with stable disease and 15 with progression. Median progression-free survival for all patients was 6 months. Dose escalation was possible in 25% of patients; however, 52% of patients required dose reductions during treatment. Clinically significant toxicities included neutropenia (65%), anemia (47%), emesis (21%), nephrotoxicity (17%), and neurotoxicity (4%). Our study indicates that endometrial cancer is significantly responsive to PAC. Enthusiasm for this regimen should be tempered by the limited duration of response and substantial treatment toxicity.     

A phase I study of concurrent weekly topotecan and cisplatin chemotherapy with whole pelvic radiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study

Purpose

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and acute dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) of intravenous topotecan administered with weekly cisplatin during pelvic radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Methods

Patients were treated at one of two dose levels receiving intravenous topotecan at 0.5 mg/m² and cisplatin at either 30 or 40 mg/m² given weekly for 6 weeks concurrently with pelvic radiation and intracavitary brachytherapy. The primary endpoint for the escalation study was acute dose-limiting toxicities occurring within 30 days of completing radiation therapy.

Results

Eleven patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicity consisting of Grade 3 nausea and vomiting lasting > 24 h in one patient and grade 3 febrile neutropenia in another patient occurred at the first dose level of weekly topotecan 0.5 mg/m² and cisplatin 40 mg/m². This necessitated de-escalation to weekly cisplatin 30 mg/m² in combination with topotecan 0.5 mg/m² and pelvic radiation. This dose level was tolerable in 6 evaluable patients with only one DLT consisting of grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 3 abdominal pain and grade 3 elevated gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT).

Conclusions

In women with locally advanced cervical cancer, intravenous topotecan 0.5 mg/m² and cisplatin 30 mg/m² given weekly for 6 weeks with concurrent pelvic radiation and intracavitary brachytherapy were tolerable. Further expansion of the feasibility cohort of this study was suspended based on the results of a phase 3 trial comparing the efficacy of platinum combinations in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer.     

A phase I trial of a 3-day topotecan Q 21 days for recurrent epithelial cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum

OBJECTIVE: This trial was undertaken to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan that can be administered for 3 days q 21 days. A 3-day schedule is more convenient and less expensive than standard 5-day dosing. METHODS: Patients with recurrent epithelial ovary, tubal, or peritoneal carcinoma were treated with escalating doses of topotecan beginning at 2.50 mg/m(2) as an outpatient days 1-3 q 21 days. Colony stimulating factors were not employed prophylactically, but could be added for grade 4 marrow toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty patients with a median age of 61 (range 46-80) and performance status of 0 or 1 were entered. All patients had received at least one prior paclitaxel/platinum regimen; 6 had received two. Ninety-one cycles were delivered (median = 6) and 98.9% were on schedule. Grade 4 neutropenia was seen in 17 of 20 patients (85%) in cycle 1 and in 38 of 91 (41.8%) total cycles. Sixteen of 20 patients (80%) started G-CSF on cycle 2. Two of 91 (2.2%) cycles had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Four cycles (4.4%) were associated with febrile neutropenia. Two patients experienced grade 4 neurotoxicity (DLT) at 4.25 mg/m(2). Other nonhematologic toxicity was mild. CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan can be safely administered on schedule as an outpatient days 1-3 q 21 days. Neurotoxicity was the DLT when G-CSF was added; the MTD was 3.75 mg/m(2). There was minimal other nonhematologic toxicity. Neutropenia was predictable and easily managed with G-CSF. Febrile neutropenia was uncommon and thrombocytopenia was rare at the doses evaluated.     

Prophylactic Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Allows Escalation of Chemotherapeutic Dose Intensity in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Background: In an effort to discover an effective regimen for use in Phase III evaluation of the efficacy of dose intensification in advanced ovarian cancer, we performed a Phase II trial of dose intensified cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Methods: Thirty patients with primary, FIGO Stage 3 or 4, epithelial ovarian cancer underwent intensified cytoreduction followed by cisplatin 105 mg/m², etoposide 300 mg/m²and ifosfamide/mesna 3 g/m², q 28 days × 6 cycles with G-CSF 5 μg/kg q day for 7 days. The dose of etoposide and ifosfamide was escalated 20% in cohorts of three patients. Results: Intensified cytoreductive surgery was successful in resecting all gross tumor in 24 patients (80%). At the original dose of cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide without G-CSF, 55% of cycles resulted in neutropenia and 38% in thrombocytopenia (dose INTENSITY = 0.8). With the addition of G-CSF, neutropenia developed in 5% of cycles and thrombocytopenia in 38%. At a 20% escalation of etoposide and ifosfamide, neutropenia developed in 17% of cycles and thrombocytopenia in 50% (dose INTENSITY = 1.2). At a 40% escalation of etoposide and ifosfamide, neutropenia developed in 33% of cycles and thrombocytopenia in 83%, which was dose limiting. The remaining 18 patients were treated at a 20% escalation and neutropenia developed in 14% of cycles and thrombocytopenia in 36%. CA125 response was 73%. At a 4.1-year median follow-up, median progression-free survival was 2.6 years and median survival was 3.0 years. Conclusion: In 30 women with primary advanced ovarian cancer, G-CSF allowed a 50% dose escalation of etoposide and ifosfamide from 0.8 to 1.2 dose intensity. The maximum tolerated dose of this regimen is cisplatin 105 mg/m², etoposide 360 mg/m², and ifosfamide 3.6 g/m²with G-CSF.     

Paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma: a phase I study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE: Based on the activity and tolerability of liposomal doxorubicin in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma, we conducted a phase I trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin with paclitaxel and carboplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in chemotherapy naive ovarian, peritoneal and tubal carcinoma patients. METHODS: Three schedules were studied: paclitaxel, carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin every 28 days; paclitaxel and carboplatin every 21 days with liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days; and weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin (AUC=5) every 21 days and liposomal doxorubicin every 42 days. The paclitaxel dose was 175 mg/m(2) over 3 h on an every 3-4 week schedule and 60 mg/m(2) when administered weekly. Based on the frequency of neutropenic sepsis, grade 4 thrombocytopenia and > or =grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity, the starting dose of liposomal doxorubicin of 20 mg/m(2) was escalated to determine the MTD. RESULTS: A total of 210 (21-day) cycles were administered to 37 patients. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred when liposomal doxorubicin was administered at 40 mg/m(2). Because of treatment-related delays resulting in decreased paclitaxel/carboplatin dose intensity, administration was modified to be given every 21 days, with liposomal doxorubicin given every 42 days. Since neutropenia was the DLT of this schedule, the schema was further modified to administer paclitaxel weekly; however, weekly administration was inconsistent because of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2), carboplatin (AUC=5) and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) are tolerable without supportive therapy. The usual dose intensity of paclitaxel/carboplatin was maintained by administering liposomal doxorubicin every other cycle.     

A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intravenous paclitaxel, intraperitoneal carboplatin and intraperitoneal paclitaxel in patients with untreated ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Objective

To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and assess the feasibility of intravenous (IV) paclitaxel, intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin, and IP paclitaxel in women with newly diagnosed Stages II-IV ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal carcinoma.

Methods

Patients received escalating doses of paclitaxel IV and carboplatin IP on day 1 and paclitaxel IP 60 mg/m² on day 8. A standard 3 + 3 design was used in the escalation phase. A two-stage group sequential design with 20 patients at the MTD was used in the feasibility phase. Patient-reported neurotoxicity was assessed pre and post treatment.

Results

Patients were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m² IV and carboplatin IP from AUC 5-7 on day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² IP on day 8. The MTD was estimated at carboplatin AUC 6 IP and 25 patients enrolled at this dose level. Within the first 4 cycles, seven (35%) of twenty evaluable patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) including grade 4 thrombocytopenia (1), grade 3 neutropenic fever (3), > 2 week delay due to ANC recovery (1), grade 3 LFT (1), and grade 3 infection (1). De-escalation to paclitaxel 135 mg/m² IV was given to improve the safety. After six evaluable patients completed 4 cycles without a DLT, bevacizumab was added and six evaluable patients completed 4 cycles with one DLT (grade 3 hyponatremia).

Conclusions

Paclitaxel at 175 mg/m² IV, carboplatin AUC 6 IP day 1 and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² IP day 8 yield 18-56% patients with DLTs. The tolerability of the regimen in combination with bevacizumab was indicated in a small cohort.     

A phase I study with an expanded cohort to assess the feasibility of intraperitoneal carboplatin and intravenous paclitaxel in untreated ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Objective

This study aimed to determine the first-cycle maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intraperitoneal carboplatin in combination with intravenous paclitaxel and then assess the feasibility of this dose over multiple cycles.

Methods

Beginning at an intraperitoneal (IP) carboplatin dose area under the curve (AUC) of 5 and a fixed intravenous dose of 175 mg/m² paclitaxel, patients were entered on a dose-escalating phase evaluating first-cycle dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). After estimating the MTD, cohorts of 20 patients were then entered in an expanded phase to evaluate DLT over four cycles.

Results

Twenty-one patients were entered on the dose-escalating phase. A first-cycle MTD of carboplatin at AUC 8 was tolerated although thrombocytopenia was dose-limiting over multiple cycles. An additional 69 patients were treated in expanded cohorts. Only 5/90 (5.6%) patients discontinued treatment because of a port problem. Four-cycle DLT required de-escalation to a carboplatin AUC of 6, and even at that dose, there were 14 dose-limiting toxic effects in 40 patients (35%). Seven dose-limiting toxicities were due to neutropenia, and 6 were due to grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. Six cycles of therapy were completed in 75% of eligible patients, but dose adjustments were required.

Conclusions

The first-cycle MTD did not predict the tolerability of this regimen over multiple cycles. Using an IP carboplatin dose of AUC 6 in combination with paclitaxel, the regimen can be administered with a high completion rate over multiple cycles. Because neutropenia is a frequent DLT, the addition of hematopoietic growth factors may permit a high completion rate while maintaining this dose.     

Phase I study of alternating doublets of topotecan/carboplatin and paclitaxel/carboplatin in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate topotecan with carboplatin in an alternating doublet with carboplatin and paclitaxel in first-line ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed stage III/IV ovarian cancer were studied. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan (cycles 1, 3, 5, 7) in an alternating doublet regimen was determined through standard dose escalation in cohorts of three; doses of carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 4 to 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2), cycles 2, 4, 6, 8) were fixed. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined only for cycle 1 as febrile neutropenia, prolonged grade 4 granulocytopenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, > or =grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity, or failure to recover in < or =7 days. The use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was also studied. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received 142 cycles of topotecan/carboplatin. Hematologic DLTs included grade 4 neutropenia (59 events, 42% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia (32 events, 23% of cycles). Granulocytopenia was generally short-lived, and only 2 cases of febrile neutropenia occurred. The MTD was 1.0 mg/m(2)/day topotecan and carboplatin AUC 4, alternating with 175 mg/m(2) paclitaxel and carboplatin AUC 4. Although G-CSF effectively managed myelosuppression, thrombocytopenia developed in later cycles, limiting further topotecan dose escalation. The median progression-free survival was 20.5 months, and elevated pretreatment CA-125 levels normalized in 29 of 34 (85%) patients. CONCLUSION: The establishment of a reasonably well-tolerated alternating doublet regimen, coupled with evidence of antitumor activity, provides the basis for further investigation of topotecan in first-line therapy of ovarian cancer. Topotecan (1.0 mg/m(2) daily for 3 days) was chosen for further evaluation in a phase II study.     

Phase 2 Trial of Liposomal Doxorubicin (40 mg/m) in Platinum/Paclitaxel-Refractory Ovarian and Fallopian Tube Cancers and Primary Carcinoma of the Peritoneum

Background. Several studies have demonstrated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) to be an active antineoplastic agent in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, with dose limiting toxicity of the standard dosing regimen (50 mg/m² q 4 weeks) being severe erythrodysesthesia (“hand–foot syndrome”) and stomatitis. We wished to develop a more tolerable liposomal doxorubicin treatment regimen and document its level of activity in a well-defined patient population with platinum/paclitaxel-refractory disease.Methods and Materials. Patients with ovarian or fallopian tube cancers or primary peritoneal carcinoma with platinum/paclitaxel-refractory disease (stable or progressive disease following treatment with these agents or previous objective response <3 months in duration) were treated with liposomal doxorubicin at a dose of 40 mg/m² q 4 weeks.Results. A total of 49 patients (median age: 60; range 41–81) entered this phase 2 trial. The median number of prior regimens was 2 (range: 1–6). Six (12%) and 4 (8%) patients experienced grade 2 hand–foot syndrome and stomatitis, respectively (no episodes of grade 3). One patient developed grade 3 diarrhea requiring hospitalization for hydration. Six (12%) individuals required dose reductions. The median number of courses of liposomal doxorubicin administered on this protocol was 2 (range: 1–12). Four of 44 patients (9%) evaluable for response exhibited objective and subjective evidence of an antineoplastic effect of therapy.Conclusion. This modified liposomal doxorubicin regimen results in less toxicity (stomatitis, hand–foot syndrome) than the standard FDA-approved dose schedule. Definite, although limited, antineoplastic activity is observed in patients with well-defined platinum- and paclitaxel-refractory ovarian cancer.     

Cycles of Dose-Intensive Chemotherapy with Peripheral Stem Cell Support in Persistent or Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer

Objective.The objective was to determine the toxicity and surgically documented response rate of sequential high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell support in patients with persistent or recurrent cisplatin-sensitive ovarian cancer.Methods.Fourteen patients (average age, 45 years) were treated with cyclophosphamide (4.5 g/m²), followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-stimulated peripheral stem cell harvests. The subsequent regimen prescribed three courses of carboplatin (1 g/m²) and cyclophosphamide (1.5 g/m²with 2-mercaptoethanesulfonate) every 2 weeks with stem cell support. This was followed by three courses of paclitaxel at 250 mg/m²every 2 weeks with G-CSF support only. Six patients were entered on the basis of a positive second-look laparotomy and 8 patients had a first recurrence after at least a 6-month disease-free interval.Results.Fourteen patients were entered and 12 patients completed all planned courses of therapy (mean time, 13 weeks). Normal hematopoiesis was reestablished after each cycle. Hospitalization for neutropenic fever occurred in 11/93 cycles (11.8%). Thirteen patients required blood transfusions and in 12 patients platelet transfusions were given. One patient had grade 3 neurotoxicity. An initial elevated CA 125 returned to normal in 7/8 patients (88%) and 71% of patients with measurable disease responded to therapy. There were 2 pathologic complete responders (PCR), making the PCR rate 2/14 or 14% (0–35%).Conclusion.Although this regimen was well tolerated and clinical response rates were high, the surgically documented response rate was not clearly superior to conventional salvage regimens in platinum-sensitive patients.     

First-Line Chemotherapy with Paclitaxel and Platinum for Advanced and Recurrent Cancer of the Cervix—A Phase II Study

Objective. The aim of this study was to assess the role of first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum in the treatment of advanced or recurrent cervix cancer.Methods. Twenty patients with advanced or recurrent cancer of the cervix with no prior chemotherapy and measurable disease were entered in a phase II trial from September 1995 to September 1998. Seventeen patients were treated with paclitaxel at 135 mg/m² over 24 h followed by cisplatin at 75 mg/m² every 4 weeks. Three patients with impaired renal function were treated with paclitaxel at 135 mg/m² over 3 h with carboplatin at 300 mg/m².Results. A clinical response rate of 45% was noted (two complete responses and seven partial responses) with a median duration of 6 months (range: 1.5–9). The median progression-free interval and overall survival in patients with a clinical response was 10.5 and 13 months, respectively, compared to 4 (P = 0.015) and 6 months in the nonresponders (P = 0.14). Seven of nine patients (77.8%) with a clinical response are alive. Patients with recurrences outside the radiation field had twice the response rate (60%) than that of those within the radiated field. The chemotherapy was well tolerated; the most significant toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenia (55%). No patient had discontinuation of chemotherapy due to toxicity.Conclusions. First-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and platinum for advanced and recurrent cervix cancer is promising and deserves consideration for large phase III trials.     

Combined Cisplatin and Carboplatin Chemotherapy for Treatment of Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

Purpose. The primary goal of this trial was to evaluate the clinical activity and the toxicity of a combination of cisplatin and carboplatin for women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients and methods. Fifty-one consecutive evaluable patients with untreated stage III and IV epithelial ovarian cancer received 360 mg/m² carboplatin on Day 1 and 50 mg/m² cisplatin on Day 2 administered intravenously every 28 days for six cycles. Drug doses were adjusted for hematologic toxicity based on nadir counts during the prior therapy course. Dose levels included 300-400 mg/m² carboplatin and 50-75 mg/m² cisplatin. Second-look surgery was optional. Endpoints were clinical response, surgical response, progression-free survival, and survival. Results. Of 8 patients with measurable disease, 3 (37.5%) had a clinical compete response, and 3 (37.5%) had a clinical partial response, for an overall clinical response rate of 75%. Of 39 patients who began chemotherapy with abnormal serum levels of CA 125, 31 (79%) achieved normalization of CA 125 at the completion of chemotherapy. Thirteen patients underwent second-look laparotomy. Of these, 7 (54%) had a pathological compete response, and 2 (15%) had a partial response. The median progression-free survival was 14 months, and the overall median survival was 32.5 months. Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the main dose-limiting toxicities. In addition, 9 patients developed grade 2 and 3 developed grade 3 ototoxicity. Conclusion. This regimen is very active against advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer. The degree of ototoxicity observed is worrisome, but such toxicity may be ameliorated by limiting the dose of cisplatin and increasing the dose of carboplatin.     

Progression-free and overall survival of a modified outpatient regimen of primary intravenous/intraperitoneal paclitaxel and intraperitoneal cisplatin in ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer

Objective

GOG study 172 demonstrated improved progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival for patients with stage III optimally debulked ovarian and peritoneal carcinoma treated with IV/IP paclitaxel and IP cisplatin compared to standard IV therapy. The inpatient administration, toxicity profile, and limited completion rate have been blamed for the lack of acceptance and widespread use of this regimen. We sought to evaluate the PFS, OS, toxicity, and completion rate of a modified outpatient IP regimen.

Methods

Using a prospectively maintained database, we evaluated the outcomes of patients who underwent primary optimal cytoreduction for stage III ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal carcinoma followed by IV/IP chemotherapy from 1/05-3/09. Our modified regimen was as follows: IV paclitaxel (135 mg/m²) over 3 h on day 1, IP cisplatin (75 mg/m²) on day 2, and IP paclitaxel (60 mg/m²) on day 8, given every 21 days for 6 cycles.

Results

We identified 102 patients who initiated the modified IV/IP regimen and completed chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 43 months. The median age at diagnosis was 57 years (range, 23-76). Primary disease site was: ovary, 77 (75%); fallopian tube, 13 (13%); peritoneum, 12 (12%). FIGO stage was: IIIA, 8 (8%); IIIB, 4 (4%); IIIC, 90 (88%). Residual disease after cytoreduction was: none, 58 (57%); ≤ 1 cm, 44 (43%). The most frequent grade 3/4 toxicities were: neutropenia, 12 (12%); gastrointestinal, 8 (8%); neurologic, 6 (6%). Eighty-two (80%) of 102 patients completed 4 or more cycles of IV/IP therapy; 56 (55%) completed all 6 cycles. The median PFS and OS were 29 and 67 months, respectively.

Conclusions

By modifying the GOG 172 treatment regimen, convenience, toxicity, and tolerability appear improved, with survival outcomes similar to those of GOG 172. This modified IV/IP regimen warrants further study.     

Paclitaxel, topotecan, and carboplatin in metastatic endometrial cancinoma: a Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study

ObjectiveTaxanes, and platinum compounds represent the chemotherapeutic agents with the greatest activity in metastatic endometrial carcinoma. We administered the combination of paclitaxel, topotecan and carboplatin to patients with metastatic or recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium to evaluate its activity and to define its toxicity.MethodsThirty-nine consecutive patients were treated on an outpatient basis with paclitaxel 150 mg/m², administered intravenously over a 3-h period and followed by carboplatin at AUC of 5 on day 3, with both agents proceding topotecan that was given at 0.75 mg/m²/day on days 1 through 3. The chemotherapy was repeated every 3 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support for a maximum of six courses.ResultsTwenty-one (60%) patients achieved objective clinical response (95% CI, 42.2–75.7%) including 4 (11.4%) complete and 17 (48.6%) partial responses. The median times to progression and survival for all patients were 8.9 and 17.7 months, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 thombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 5 (13%) and 4 (10%) patients, respectively, but only 2 episodes of neutropenic fever were encountered. Grade 2 or 3 neurotoxicity was observed in 23% of patients.ConclusionsThe combination of paclitaxel, topotecan and carboplatin with G-CSF support appears active with acceptable toxicity in patients with metastatic or recurrent carcinoma of the endometrium.     

Paclitaxel–Anthracycline Combination Chemotherapy in Relapsing Advanced Ovarian Cancer after Platinum-Based Chemotherapy: A Pilot Study

Despite high response rates with platinum-based front-line chemotherapy, the prognosis for advanced ovarian carcinoma (AOC) is poor. Salvage chemotherapy for recurrent AOC was of little benefit before paclitaxel as single-agent therapy showed appreciable efficacy. Anthracyclines are effective, but are not often part of first-line therapy. In this pilot study, we investigated the feasibility of an anthracycline plus paclitaxel combination therapy for recurrent AOC. Twenty-four patients received 150 mg/m²paclitaxel on day 1, with either 50 mg/m²doxorubicin on day 1 or 75 mg/m²epirubicin on day 1 every 3 weeks. A 27% overall response rate was obtained. Myelosuppression was the major toxicity, but was manageable. No myocardiac toxicity was observed. We conclude that paclitaxel–anthracyclines is a promising salvage combination therapy in AOC that should be investigated further.     

Evaluation of the relation between patient characteristics and the state of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with gynecologic cancer receiving paclitaxel and carboplatin

Purpose

An antiemetic regimen for patients taking paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) includes dexamethasone (20 mg) to protect against hypersensitivity. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), however, is difficult to adequately control in patients receiving TC. In the present study, we retrospectively investigated risk factors for CINV in patients receiving TC with this antiemetic regimen based on a questionnaire.

Methods

Eligible patients were diagnosed with gynecologic cancer and receiving paclitaxel (175 mg/m²) intravenously for 3 h and carboplatin (area under the curve 5 mg/mL per min) on day 1 every 3 weeks in our institution, and treated with granisetron (3 mg) and dexamethasone (20 mg) for antiemesis. Data of nausea and vomiting assessed by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version4.0 were collected from the medical records. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire including items such as age and hyperemesis. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate univariate and independent multivariate associations with items on nausea of grade 2 or greater and vomiting of grade 1 or greater.

Results

On univariate logistic analysis, no item was significantly associated with nausea of grade 2 or greater. Hypertension and hyperemesis gravidarum and adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with delayed vomiting of grade 1 or greater. Multivariate analysis was performed with delayed vomiting of grade 1 or greater as an endpoint, and the resulting independent items were hypertension and hyperemesis gravidarum.

Conclusions

The present study showed that the risk factor for delayed vomiting of grade 1 or higher was a history of hyperemesis gravidarum in patients receiving conventional TC with dexamethasone (20 mg) and granisetron. Therefore, in patients with this risk factor, criteria of major organizations should be followed first.     

Weekly paclitaxel in heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients: does this treatment still provide further advantages?

Objective

To evaluate the disease control rate (DCR) in heavily pretreated and relapsed ovarian cancer patients re-challenged with a weekly paclitaxel schedule and to establish whether a correlation between dose intensity, progression-free interval (PFI) and overall survival (OS) exists.

Methods

Retrospective data were collected from 30 heavily pretreated metastatic ovarian cancer patients who received 80?mg/m²/week paclitaxel regimen.

Results

The treatment was well tolerated and showed a DCR in 70% of the patients, with only one case of grade 3 hematological toxicity. One patient (3%) showed a complete response, 15 patients (50%) a partial response and five patients (17%) a stabilization of their disease. The regimen was mostly used as a fourth-line chemotherapy (range 2?C7). The median dose intensity in responding patients was 57.5?mg/m²/week and in those with progressive disease 49.7?mg/m²/week. (p?=?0.20). PFI and OS were increased in the responder patient groups with a log-rank test of 25.64 (p?<?0.001) and 15.10 (p?=?0.0001), respectively.

Conclusions

Weekly administration of paclitaxel was active and well tolerated as a salvage therapy for heavily pretreated ovarian cancer patients.