Analysis of HER2 by chromogenic in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in lymph node-negative breast carcinoma: Prognostic relevance

In patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma (LNNBC), the prevalence of HER2 overexpression and gene amplification and their prognostic value have not been extensively evaluated. We examined 162 patients with LNNBC with complete follow-up. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HER2, Ki67, and p53 was performed. HER2 gene status was analyzed by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and discordant cases by fluorescence in situ hybridization. HER2 overexpression was seen in 24.7% of cases (40/162) and amplification by CISH in 17.6% (28/159). Agreement between IHC and CISH was achieved in 147 (92.5%) cases. Amplification was seen in 21 (100%) of 21 (3+), 6 (35.3%) of 17 (2+), and 1 (0.6%) of 121 (0-1+) tumors. Fluorescence in situ hybridization detected 3 (1.8%) additional cases. HER2 overexpression and amplification were present in tumors of high grade, with necrosis and lymph-vascular invasion (LVI) (all P < .027). In addition, amplified tumors showed Ki67 of more than 20% and p53 overexpression (P < .05). By univariate analysis, shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were seen for patients with tumors showing HER2 amplification, LVI, and Ki67 of more than 20% (P < .05) (Kaplan-Meier). However, the multivariate analysis (Cox regression) demonstrated only Ki67 as an independent prognostic factor for both DFS (P = .017) and OS (P = .010), and as a trend for HER2 gene status (OS, P = .087) and LVI (DFS, P = .11; OS, P = .063). We conclude that IHC is a reliable method for detecting HER2 expression that can be complemented by CISH in nondefinitive cases (2+). Moreover, CISH is a valuable tool for the assessment of HER2 gene status with potential prognostic value and, therefore, in clinical decision making for treatment of high-risk LNNBC.     

Assessment of the HER2 status in breast cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization: a technical review with interpretive guidelines

Diagnostic assays for HER2 in breast cancer provide important prognostic information and independently help guide management by identifying patients who are the most likely to benefit from Herceptin-targeted therapy. The biological events underlying HER2 -driven breast cancer that can be assessed in routine clinical specimens include the evaluation of gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), enhanced messenger RNA expression by real-time polymerase chain reaction, and the assessment of protein overexpression at the tumor cell membrane by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Immunohistochemistry and FISH methodologies have the advantage of being morphologically driven, allowing for correlations between HER2 expression and morphologic features. However, each has important advantages and disadvantages, which are discussed in detail. Although immunohistochemistry is familiar and readily accommodated in most surgical pathology laboratories, increasing demands for FISH testing in the clinical setting will require greater familiarity with the technical aspects of FISH assays and their interpretation by the greater laboratory community. In this review, we provide an overview of FISH testing for HER2 in breast cancer, with an emphasis on technical considerations, interpretive guidelines, scoring criteria, and quality control. The development of automated platforms for hybridization, image analysis for signal enumeration, and experience with FISH interpretation should broaden the availability of this technology for clinical diagnostic testing.     

Comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridisation with fluorescence in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry for the assessment of her-2/neu oncogene in archival material of breast carcinoma

The successful treatment of breast cancer is dependent upon a number of complex factors. Her-2/neu gene amplification is known to be one of the most common genetic alterations associated with breast cancer and its accurate determination has become necessary for the selection of patients for trastuzumab therapy.The aim of this study was to prove the consistency of chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) technique after analyzing the overexpression of the Her-2/neu proto-oncogene in 100 invasive breast carcinomas and by comparing CISH results with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Moreover, it was done to evaluate the possible correlation of estrogen (ERs) and progesterone receptors (PRs), the proliferation marker Ki67 and the tumour suppressor gene p53 with HER-2/neu status of these breast carcinomas.Of the 100 breast carcinomas that were analysed, 22 cases showed HER-2/neu amplification, 66 cases showed no amplification, whereas 12 cases were non-interpretable in both assays (FISH and CISH). Consequently, the overall concordance between FISH and CISH was 100%. Additionally, it was observed that when HER-2/neu gene was overexpressed, there was an association with negative PRs and ERs status, negative p53 protein expression and high Ki67 labelling index.It is concluded that patients with tumours scoring 2+ with the CBE356 antibody (borderline immunohistochemistry-tested cases) would also benefit from CISH as it is shown to be highly accurate, practical and can be easily integrated into routine testing in any histopathology laboratory. Finally, CISH represents an important addition to the HER2 testing algorithm.     

Chromogenic in situ hybridisation testing for HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer produces highly reproducible results concordant with fluorescence in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry

AIMS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy, ease of use and reproducibility of chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) for HER2 testing by studying its inter-laboratory concordance in five Australian pathology laboratories. METHODS: The HER2 status of 49 breast cancers was determined by CISH twice in two different laboratories. Each sample had previously been tested by immunohistochemistry (IHC; 2+ and 3+ cases selected) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Participating laboratories were blinded to these test results. Oestrogen receptor (ER) status was also evaluated for each cancer. RESULTS: High correlation was observed between FISH and CISH results. No cases showing high gene amplification by FISH were scored as non-amplified by CISH (kappa coefficient = 1). High correlation was observed between IHC and CISH, all IHC 3+ samples showing amplification by CISH. Inter-laboratory CISH concordance was also good (kappa coefficient = 0.67). Fifty-six per cent of HER2-amplified samples tested ER positive, while 42% of ER-positive cases showed HER2 gene amplification, confirming that HER2 testing should not be confined to ER-negative breast cancers. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that CISH is a robust test to assess HER2 status in breast cancer and therefore is an important addition to the HER2 testing algorithm.     

Determination of the HER2 amplification status by in situ fluorescent hybridization and concordance with immunohistochemistry for breast cancer samples in Colombia

Objectives:

To determine the status of the HER2 amplification in Breast cancer performed in peripheral laboratories in Colombia by immunohistochemistry and its comparison with central laboratories and the FISH status.

Methods:

Four thousand one hundred and five cases referred for the determination of the HER2 status by FISH and/or IHQ to the Department of Pathology of the Fundacion Santa Fe were studied. The analysis included correlation between the IHQ HER2 score submitted by the peripheral laboratory (PL), the HER2 score emitted in the CL and the FISH studies performed in the central laboratory (CL).

Results:

Two thousand five hundred and eight HER2 IHQ studies were performed in the (CL), using the Dako Herceptest. With the following results: 68.2 % negative (0-1+); 16,4% indeterminate (2+); 15.3% 3+ and 2.3 % not adequate. 1360/ 1719 cases studied by FISH came from the (PL), and 329 (19.1%) from the (CL). Comparing the IHQ score emitted by the PL and the positive FISH status showed: 6/28 0+ were positive (21. 4%); 7/31 1+ (22. 5%); 397/1240 2+ (32.8%) and 74/91 3+ (81. 3%). In the CL the results were 1/9 0+ (11.1%); 3/18 1+ (16.7%); 154/292 2+ (53%); and 9/9 3+ (100%). Only 1/4 negative cases (0/1+) was in house.

Conclusion:

The false negative rate (22%), and false positive results (18.7%), of the HER2 status performed by IHQ in peripheral laboratories in Colombia is unacceptable high as well as the inadequacy of tissue indicating that pre-analytical factors have to be improved in Colombia in order to get optimal results.     

Weekly Paclitaxel and Trastuzumab as a First-Line Therapy in Patients with HER2-Overexpressing Metastatic Breast Cancer: Magnitude of HER2/neu Amplification as a Predictive Factor for Efficacy

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab as firs-tline chemotherapy in women with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer (MBC), and we investigated the prognostic factors including magnitude of HER2/neu amplification in this population. We analyzed 54 patients with HER2-overexpressing MBC that were treated with weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab as first-line chemotherapy from February 2004 to December 2006. At a median follow-up of 28 months, median time to progression (TTP) was 16.6 months (95% CI, 9.4 to 23.7 months) and median overall survival was 25.6 months (95% CI, 21.8 to 27.3 months). Therapy was generally well tolerated, although three patients (5.5%) experienced reversible, symptomatic heart failure. Of the 27 patients evaluable for the HER2 FISH, patients with a HER2/CEP17 ratio of ≤4.0 had significantly shorter TTP than those with a HER2/CEP17 ratio of >4.0 (10.8 vs. 23.2 months, P=0.034). A HER2/CEP17 ratio of >4.0 was identified as significant predictive factor of TTP by multivariate analysis (P=0.032). The combination of weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab as first-line chemotherapy is an effective regimen in patients with HER2-FISH-positive MBC. Furthermore, the magnitude of HER2 amplification is an independent predictive factor of TTP.     

HER2-testing in 538 consecutive breast cancer cases using FISH and immunohistochemistry

HER2 is amplified and overexpressed in up to 20% of all breast carcinomas, and accurate assessment of the HER2-status is essential for the appropriate use of anti-HER2 therapies, including trastuzumab. Here, we have evaluated the accuracy of two commercially available and commonly used HER2 antibodies (antibody A0485 and HercepTest), followed by FISH-test, in 538 consecutive breast cancers, to identify a reliable procedure for the determination of HER2-status. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis revealed that 282 cases (52.2%) were positive (2+/3+) for antibody A0485, while only 179 cases (33.3%) were positive (2+/3+) for HercepTest (81.2% concordance between A0485 and HercepTest). FISH-analysis of the 103 IHC discordant cases revealed 89.3% concordance with HercepTest. The results of the present study, which is the largest in Scandinavia, revealed a significantly higher concordance rate between HercepTest and HER2 copy number status than between antibody A0485 and HER2 copy number status. Eleven cases (11% of 103 discordant cases) with HER2-amplification were positive for antibody A0485 and false negative for HercepTest. Our findings indicate that HercepTest is a reliable and accurate IHC-assay and that in the absence of clinical outcome data for IHC-positive/FISH-negative and IHC-negative/FISH-positive patients, FISH-analysis should be performed on all IHC 2+ and 3+ cases.     

Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens

García‐Caballero T, Grabau D, Green A R, Gregory J, Schad A, Kohlwes E, Ellis I O, Watts S & Mollerup J
(2010) Histopathology 56, 472–480
Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens Aims: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used to reveal several genomic imbalances relevant to proper cancer diagnosis and to the correct treatment regime. However, FISH requires expensive and advanced fluorescence microscopes in addition to expertise in fluorescence microscopy. To determine whether a newly developed dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) method is a suitable alternative to FISH, we analysed the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (HER2) amplification level of 168 breast cancer specimens using dual‐colour CISH and FISH and compared the results. Methods and results: We found 100% agreement between HER2 status determined by FISH and dual‐colour CISH. Furthermore, we observed that the time used to score slides was significantly reduced by 28% in dual‐colour CISH compared with the FISH protocol. Concordance between HER2 protein status and dual‐colour CISH or FISH was equally good with an overall agreement of 96.8%. Correlation between the HER2/centromere 17 gene ratios obtained with dual‐colour CISH and FISH was highly significant with an overall correlation coefficient (ρ) of 0.96. Conclusions: We conclude that dual‐colour CISH and bright field microscopy are excellent alternatives to FISH when analysing the HER2 status of primary breast cancer.     

Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) to detect HER2 gene amplification in breast and gastric cancer: Comparison with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

The chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assay, designed to detect the amplification of the HER2 gene in formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) breast cancer (BC) and gastric cancer (GC) tissue specimens, was evaluated in 125 FFPE BC cases and 198 FFPE GC cases for which the HER2 status had been predetermined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In the 125 BC cases and the 198 gastric cases, we found a very good concordance (98.4% and 99.0%, respectively) between CISH and FISH. In particular, we evaluated the polysomy cases, as these cases often have ambiguous treatment options in clinical practice. The polysomy of chromosome 17 was defined as the presence of three or more CEP17 signals in at least 10% of the tumor cells. In the 50 BC cases and 54 GC cases displaying chromosome 17 polysomy, the concordance between FISH and CISH was 98.0% and 98.1%, respectively. These results indicate that CISH could provide an accurate and practical alternative to FISH for the clinical diagnosis of HER2 gene amplification in FFPE BC and FFPE GC samples.     

Comparison of dual-color dual-hapten brightfield in situ hybridization (DDISH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast cancer HER2 assessment

The most optimal method for assessing HER2 status is still subject to controversy as far as the type of assay used, the optimal method to perform, and the costs of each assay are concerned. The current study was done as a validation study prior to setting up a clinical HER2 testing service using the new commercial dual-color dual-hapten brightfield in situ hybridization (DDISH), but it was felt that our experience may be of interest to other laboratories considering setting up HER2 diagnostic facilities.     

Chromogenic in situ hybridization for Her‐2/neu‐oncogene in breast cancer: comparison of a new dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization

Aims: Her‐2/neu testing is used as a marker for Herceptin^® therapy. The aim was to investigate new dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), in a large number of breast carcinomas (n = 205) with DNA‐specific dual‐colour probes (ZytoVision, Bremerhaven, Germany) and to compare the results with immunohistochemistry (n = 205) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (n = 129). Methods and results: Paraffin‐embedded tissue of 205 patients was used. After immunohistochemistry with a focus on immunohistochemically uncertain cases, Her‐2/neu amplification using dual‐colour CISH (ZytoVision^®) was analysed. Validation by FISH was performed. The results were: immunohistochemistry, 27.8% with strong expression, 53.7% with uncertain overexpression and 18.5% with no expression; FISH, 25.6% amplified and 74.4% negative; CISH, 35.6% amplified, 62.9% negative and 1.5% not evaluable. Comparison of immunohistochemistry with CISH: CISH negative in 100% with immunohistochemistry 0/1+, amplified in 82.5% with immunohistochemistry 3+; 5.9% contradictory results: 4.4% immunohistochemistry 3+ and negative by CISH, 1.5% negative in immunohistochemistry but amplified by CISH; FISH (129 cases), 8.5% contradictory results to immunohistochemistry, 6.2% immunohistochemistry 3+ and negative by FISH, 2.3% negative by immunohistochemistry and amplified by FISH; comparison of CISH and FISH, 94.6% same results, 3.9% different ones, 1.6% CISH not analysable. Conclusions: CISH, using dual‐colour probes (ZytoVision^®) is as good as FISH for Her‐2/neu analysis. The few discrepant results are likely to be caused by polysomy or tumour heterogeneity.     

Diagnosis of HER2 gene amplification in breast carcinoma

Amplification of the HER2 gene, mapping to 17q21.1, is present in about 20 % of breast carcinomas. Amplification leads to an overexpression of the protein that made it possible to develop a targeted therapy by the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin). A good response to the treatment requires a stringent assessment of the gene status in tumours; only patients whose tumour shows a high expression of the protein or an amplification of the gene are eligible. Cases with intermediate level expression are checked by in situ hybridization, mainly by FISH, to identify amplifications in this subset of tumours. Results are sometimes difficult to interpret due to the frequent aneuploidy of the tumours. Moreover, copy number cut-offs of the gene for defining an amplification are variable according to the studies. A tumour is considered now as amplified when showing more than six HER2 copies per nucleus, or a ratio HER2 to centromere 17 greater than 2.2. The phenomenon of HER2 amplification in breast cancers is discussed in this paper, and distinguished from gene overrepresentation. It is recommended that tumours showing six to seven copies of HER2 are assessed with a kit including the centromere 17. Clusters of signals are characteristic of amplifications. The process designed for the assessment of HER2 is a model of strategies that will be used for the evaluation of markers involved in future targeted therapies.     

Correlation of HER2 overexpression with gene amplification and its relation to chromosome 17 aneuploidy: a 5-year experience with invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas

The HER2 oncogene shows expression or amplification, or both, in approximately 15% to 20% of breast cancers and has been associated with poor prognosis and a response to trastuzumab therapy. HER2 gene status determines the eligibility of breast cancer patients for trastuzumab therapy and a large fraction (41-56%) of these patients respond to targeted therapy. Several studies have related the increased expression of HER2 to an increased copy number of chromosome 17, rather than amplification of the HER2 gene. We compared the results of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in both invasive ductal and invasive lobular carcinomas, to determine the frequency of chromosome 17 aneuploidy associated with discordant results. In total, 390 invasive ductal carcinomas and 180 invasive lobular carcinomas diagnosed from January 2000 to December 2005 were included in the study only if results were available for immunohistochemistry (HercepTest; DAKO, Carpinteria, California) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (PathVysion HER2 DNA Probe Kit; Abbott Laboratories, Des Plaines, Illinois). Tumors classified as invasive ductal carcinomas were graded according to the Bloom-Richardson grading system. Correlation between the results of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed for all categories. Among invasive ductal carcinomas, 29% (115/390) showed chromosome 17 aneuploidy, mostly associated with grade 3/HER2 2+ (45%) or grade 2/HER2 3+ (55%) that were not amplified. Also, 34% (12/35) of invasive lobular carcinomas showed chromosome 17 aneuploidy; approximately one-third of these cases were HER2 2+ (33%) and HER2 3+ (37%) that were not amplified. Discordance between the results of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization in both ductal and lobular carcinomas is largely associated with chromosome 17 aneuploidy.     

HER2 assessment on core biopsy specimens using monoclonal antibody CB11 accurately determines HER2 status in breast carcinoma

Purdie C A, Jordan L B, McCullough J B, Edwards S L, Cunningham J, Walsh M, Grant A, Pratt N & Thompson A M
(2010) Histopathology 56, 702–707
HER2 assessment on core biopsy specimens using monoclonal antibody CB11 accurately determines HER2 status in breast carcinoma Aims: HER2 status is a prognostic factor in breast carcinoma and predicts response to trastuzumab therapy. Trastuzumab is effective in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant and advanced disease settings. Knowledge of HER2 status early in the diagnostic and therapeutic process is vital for treatment planning. HER2 analysis is usually carried out by immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The aim of this study was to establish whether HER2 immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibody CB11 and carried out on the initial diagnostic core biopsy specimen accurately predicts HER2 amplification status. Methods and results:  This is the largest study to date in which HER2 protein expression has been assessed by CB11 immunohistochemistry on the diagnostic core biopsy specimen and correlated with the result of FISH. Using FISH as the definitive HER2 status, we studied 568 invasive breast cancers using CB11 immunohistochemistry on core biopsy. This analysis had a sensitivity of 99.4%, specificity of 93.9%, false‐positive frequency of 3.9% and false‐negative frequency of 1.1%. These data are as good as those obtained from analysing resection specimens alone in UK national reference centres. Conclusions:  CB11 immunohistochemistry accurately predicts HER2 amplification status and can be reliably carried out on core biopsy specimens of breast carcinoma.     

Single nucleotide polymorphisms of HER2 related to osteosarcoma susceptibility

Aims: The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between single necleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) gene with osteosarcoma susceptibility in Chinese Han population. Methods: 90 patients with osteosarcoma and 100 healthy controls who were frequency-matched with the former by age and gender were enrolled for a case-control study. 5 SNPs of HER2, namely rs2952155, rs1810132, rs2952156, rs1136201 and rs1058808, were tested by Sequenom time of flight mass spectrometry technique. The linkage disequilibrium and haplotype were analyzed using haploview software. The risk intensity of osteosarcoma was expressed by odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) which was calculated by chi-squared text. Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) was also evaluated by chi-squared text. Results: HER2 gene rs1136201 and rs1058808 polymorphisms were associated with the increased risk of osteosarcoma (P=0.04 and 0.02, respectively). Allele G in rs1136201 was 1.67 higher risk for osteosarcoma in cases than the control group (OR=1.67, 95% CI=1.11-2.51) and G allele of rs1058808 polymorphism also significantly increased osteosarcoma susceptibility (OR=2.06, 95% CI=1.27-3.22). The haplotype analysis showed that haplotype C-T-G-G might be a susceptible haplotype to osteosarcoma (OR=1.74, 95% CI=1.01-3.00). HWE test was eligible in controls (P>0.05). Conclusion: HER2 gene rs1136201 and rs1058808 polymorphisms and haplotype C-T-G-G may be related to osteosarcoma susceptibility in Chinese Han population, indicating that the interaction of gene polrmorphism plays an role in osteosarcoma risk.     

Metronomic chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting: results of two parallel feasibility trials (TraQme and TAME) in patients with HER2+ and HER2? locally advanced breast cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has practical and theoretical advantages over adjuvant chemotherapy strategy in breast cancer (BC) management. Moreover, metronomic delivery has a more favorable toxicity profile. The present study examined the feasibility of neoadjuvant metronomic chemotherapy in two cohorts [HER2+ (TraQme) and HER2− (TAME)] of locally advanced BC. Twenty patients were prospectively enrolled (TraQme, n=9; TAME, n=11). Both cohorts received weekly paclitaxel at 100 mg/m² during 8 weeks followed by weekly doxorubicin at 24 mg/m² for 9 weeks in combination with oral cyclophosphamide at 100 mg/day (fixed dose). The HER2+ cohort received weekly trastuzumab. The study was interrupted because of safety issues. Thirty-six percent of patients in the TAME cohort and all patients from the TraQme cohort had stage III BC. Of note, 33% from the TraQme cohort and 66% from the TAME cohort displayed hormone receptor positivity in tumor tissue. The pathological complete response rates were 55% and 18% among patients enrolled in the TraQme and TAME cohorts, respectively. Patients in the TraQme cohort had more advanced BC stages at diagnosis, higher-grade pathological classification, and more tumors lacking hormone receptor expression, compared to the TAME cohort. The toxicity profile was also different. Two patients in the TraQme cohort developed pneumonitis, and in the TAME cohort we observed more hematological toxicity and hand-foot syndrome. The neoadjuvant metronomic chemotherapy regimen evaluated in this trial was highly effective in achieving a tumor response, especially in the HER2+ cohort. Pneumonitis was a serious, unexpected adverse event observed in this group. Further larger and randomized trials are warranted to evaluate the association between metronomic chemotherapy and trastuzumab treatment.     

Immunohistochemical COX-2 overexpression correlates with HER-2/neu overexpression in invasive breast carcinomas: a pilot study

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is a prostaglandin synthase that catalyzes the synthesis of prostaglandin G2 and H2. It has been shown that COX-2 plays an important role in tumorigenesis of different tumor types and it is thought to take part in breast carcinogenesis. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the relationship of immunohistochemical COX-2 expression with clinicopathological parameters, including HER-2/neu overexpression in invasive breast carcinoma (IBC).Our study population comprised 10 normal breasts, 25 ductal carcinomas in situ (DCIS), and 51 invasive breast carcinomas. Immunohistochemical overexpressions of COX-2 and HER-2/neu were investigated in sections of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks by 3 observers.In normal breast, DCIS and IBC, the COX-2 overexpression rate was 0%, 84%, and 58.8%, respectively. In IBC, COX-2 overexpression had a significant relationship with HER-2/neu overexpression (p = 0.026) and a high histological grade (p = 0.026). COX-2 expression in both DCIS (n = 25) and IBC (n = 51) was significantly higher than in normal breast tissue (p < 0.0001). In addition, the COX-2 expression rate was significantly higher in DCIS than in IBC (p = 0.042).Our results indicated that COX-2 overexpression correlates with aggressive phenotypic features, such as HER-2/neu overexpression and high histological grade in IBC. Increased expression of COX-2 in both DCIS and IBC in comparison to normal breast could indicate a role in breast carcinogenesis. COX-2 overexpression may provide a clinically useful biomarker for estimating tumor aggressiveness.     

Topoisomerase IIalpha gene amplification in gastric carcinomas: correlation with the HER2 gene. An immunohistochemical, immunoblotting, and multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization study

Topoisomerase IIalpha (topoIIalpha) is an enzyme required for DNA replication and a molecular target for drugs called anthracyclines. The topoIIalpha gene (TOP2A) is located close to the HER-2/neu oncogene (HER2). We assessed gastric cancers to (1) clarify the relationship between gene amplification and protein overexpression of topoIIalpha and HER2; (2) evaluate the correlation between gene amplification and protein overexpression of topoIIalpha; and (3) examine the relationship between the results of immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis for topoIIalpha. In a combined analysis of immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization on 552 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded gastric cancer tissues, 38 cases were found to have HER2 amplification. Further examination by fluorescence in situ hybridization revealed amplification of TOP2A in 13 of the 38 cases. No aberrations in the TOP2A gene were observed in cases without HER2 overexpression, except for one containing a gene deletion. The TopoIIalpha protein-labeling index was not correlated with TOP2A amplification. Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed on nuclear imprint specimens obtained from 9 cases using simultaneous probes for TOP2A, HER2, and centromere 17. Of these 9 cases, 3 displayed coamplification of TOP2A and HER2, and only 1 of the 3 cases revealed a high expression of topoIIalpha in Western blot. Although patients having gastric adenocarcinoma with TOP2A amplification could be considered suitable for clinical trials, information involving anthracycline therapy is not firmly understood in regards to the status of TOP2A amplification or protein overexpression. Therefore, results of the current study will provide further insight for the clinical application of anthracycline in gastric cancers.     

Tissue microarray technology in breast cancer HER2 diagnostics

Tissue microarrays (TMAs) as current medical research tools significantly lower the costs of immunohistochemical examinations (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) while enabling high levels of standardization and reliability. Taking HER2 testing of breast cancer into consideration, we assessed the routine applicability of TMAs. A hundred and seventy-four consecutive samples of invasive breast cancer cases were selected. TMAs were constructed in order to conduct double HER2 immunohistochemical analysis and FISH abreast using the conventional slide by slide method. Comparing the immunohistochemical data obtained from TMAs with the routinely processed large sections, we found a 94.5%/92.7%, 85.7%/88.9% and 91.2%/90% concordance at immunohistochemically HER2-negative, HER2 2+ and 3+ cases using the CB11/HercepTest, respectively. FISH performed on TMAs helped to determine Herceptin therapy suitability in all cases, and when discordance was found, we controlled FISH on "large sections". Being able to conduct FISH examinations at a reasonable price with or without prior immunohistochemical analysis, departments confronted with a certain frequency of breast cancer cases might extensively use the type of TMAs applied in our study. This is a relieve not only with regard to diagnostic work using microarrays, but this also allows to take new directions in research by shedding light on certain unusual cases.