Assessment of functional outcomes in head and neck cancer

The goals of the present publication are (a) to identify standardised methods and tools applied in clinical trials and cohort studies to assess key functional aspects in HNC, using the Brief ICF Core Set for head and neck cancer (ICF-HNC) as a reference and (b) to propose a set of sound standardised methods and tools suitable to assess functional problems in HNC. This work contributed to the development of practical ICF-HNC based guidelines targeting the standardised measurement of functional outcomes in HNC follow-up and clinical research in Germany. A systematic review of randomised and clinical controlled trials, and observational studies in HNC were carried out to identify standardised methods and tools. Suitable methods and tools were then selected based on pre-defined criteria. 210 assessment methods and tools were identified in 136 studies: 146 patients reported outcomes (PRO) and 64 tools rated by health professionals. Altogether 59 tools were considered suitable to be included in guidelines: four side effects classifications, two performance status scales, 31 PROs, 10 assessment criteria for clinical examinations, seven assessment methods and tools for the evaluation of technical, equipment-based procedures and five technical, equipment-based procedures. It was possible to identify and select sound and standardised assessment methods and tools for almost all functioning areas defined in the ICF-HNC. Since no tool sufficiently covers support provision by immediate family and by health professionals as well as economic self-sufficiency, we recommend a corresponding update of existing tools.     

Treatment outcomes in veterans with HPV-positive head and neck cancer

Objectives

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) caused by the human papilloma virus (HPV) has an improved prognosis relative to HPV-negative tumors. Patients with HPV-positive disease may benefit from different treatment modalities in order to optimize survival and quality of life. We sought to investigate HPV-positive HNSCC within the military veteran population, and analyze the role of treatment modality in outcomes of patients with HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumors.

FDG-PET prediction of head and neck squamous cell cancer outcomes

OBJECTIVE: To confirm that high pretreatment uptake of 2-deoxy-2[(18)F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG) detected by positron emission tomography (PET) measured at the primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and at metastatic nodal disease predicts poor outcomes for HNSCC. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: We enrolled 63 consecutive patients with a histological diagnosis of HNSCC (including tumors of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, and hypopharynx) from September 2000 through June 2003, into a prospective institutional imaging trial. Fifty-four patients (86%) underwent a baseline FDG-PET scan before curative treatment and were eligible for analysis. RESULTS: A primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) of greater than 9.0 predicted inferior local recurrence-free survival (P = .02) and disease-free survival (P = .03). Nodal SUV dichotomized according to the cohort median of 6.1 did not predict for either disease outcome (P = .71 and P = .98, respectively). On proportional hazards analysis, local recurrence and disease event hazard ratios for a primary tumor SUV of 9.0 or greater remained significant or at borderline significance when adjusted for nodal SUV or other clinical covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support an association between baseline primary tumor FDG SUV and HNSCC outcomes. In contrast, nodal FDG SUV was not predictive. Primary tumor FDG SUV is a promising prognostic factor and may establish the need for intensified locoregional therapy in individual patients. Multi-institutional imaging trials and further characterization of the biology responsible for elevated FDG uptake in HNSCC will be necessary to confirm the prognostic utility of FDG-labeled PET.     

Quality-of-life outcomes in the evaluation of head and neck cancer treatments

OBJECTIVES: To review the published literature to evaluate the design, use of terminology, and interpretation of results in studies using quality-of-life (QOL) instruments to measure differences between head and neck cancer treatments at a point in time or to report changes over time in one or more treatment groups. DATA SOURCE: MEDLINE search for subject headings "head and neck neoplasms" (as a main topic) and "quality of life" or "health status" restricted to English-language sources and a 10-year period from 1989 to 1999. STUDY SELECTION: Four hundred forty-five abstracts were reviewed to find articles using an instrument to compare head and neck cancer therapy groups with a QOL outcome (13.7% included). DATA EXTRACTION: Two readers reviewed each article to determine how terminology was used, if a scientific study design was used, and if differences or changes in scores were clinically interpreted. RESULTS: Sixty-one articles were reviewed. Forty different instruments were used. Terminology was used inconsistently in 21 (34.4%) of the 61 articles. A scientific study design was used in only 11 (18.0%) of the 61 articles (P<.001). A clinical interpretation of results was given in 16 (26.2%) of the 61 articles (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: While QOL outcomes show promise for assisting with treatment decisions in head and neck cancer therapy, few studies using instruments to measure QOL outcomes are hypothesis driven and clinical interpretations of results are not commonly provided. We recommend that future studies identify the construct to be measured, specify comparator groups and hypotheses a priori, and provide clinical interpretations of results.     

Limited use of complementary and alternative medicine in Israeli head and neck cancer patients

HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE: The use of complementary or alternative medicine (CAM) is growing among cancer patients. A Medline search failed to reveal any dedicated report of CAM use specifically in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). STUDY DESIGN: Use of CAM was evaluated in a cohort of treated HNC patients. METHODS: Patients treated for HNC were asked if they had used CAM since their diagnosis. Demographic data and data pertaining to mode of CAM, duration of treatment and effects were obtained. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three patients (mean age 61 years) were included. Only nine patients (6.3%) reported using disease related CAM. This included acupuncture (4), Reiki (2), naturopathy (2), hypnosis (1), shiatsu (1), chiropractic treatment (1), homeopathy (1), and selenium (1). CONCLUSION: Contrary to the reported use, few of our HNC patients used CAM. Although this could be related to good caregiver-patient relationship, further studies in comparable populations are warranted to evaluate if this is a local or a pervading finding in head and neck cancer patients.     

Effect of body mass index on chemoradiation outcomes in head and neck cancer

Objective: To investigate the association between initial body mass index (BMI) and chemoradiation therapy (CRT) outcomes in head and neck cancer patients. Methods: Retrospective study of 72 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx treated with primary concurrent CRT with curative intent over a 5 year period. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the association between initial BMI and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube dependence, tumor recurrence, disease‐free survival, and overall survival while controlling for the independent variables of age, sex, race, site, stage, and smoking and alcohol use. Results: Patients with normal or low BMI (BMI ≤25 kg/m²) were significantly more likely to be percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy dependent at last follow‐up (odds ratio 4.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–12.9; P = .014). This group also had significantly earlier recurrence (hazard ratio 4.4; 95% CI 1.2–15.9; P = .026) and shorter overall survival (hazard ratio 3.6; 95% CI 1.04–12.6, P = .043). Conclusions: The present study suggests that CRT patients with BMI greater than 25 have improved swallowing outcomes, longer time to disease recurrence, and improved survival when compared with similar patients with lower BMI. BMI at presentation may be an important clinical factor to consider when determining the optimal treatment modality for a head and neck cancer patient. Further investigation is required to determine whether primary surgery should be the preferred treatment in normal or low BMI patients.     

Papillomavirus and head and neck cancer

Tobacco and alcohol consumption are the main risk factors for head and neck cancers. Papillomavirus (HPV) infection was recently associated with the development of malignant tumors of the oropharynx, according to molecular and biological arguments. We describe the oncogenic mechanisms of HPV infections, the epidemiological and clinical aspects of associated head and neck cancers, their prognosis, and issues of specific therapeutic strategies.     

HPV and head and neck cancer

Head and neck cancer is frequent worldwide and oropharyngeal locations are presently sharply on the increase, in relation with an increasing incidence of oropharyngeal infection by oncogenic type-16 human papillomavirus (HPV). The clinical and biologic profile of these patients is distinct from that of other oropharyngeal carcinoma patients, with earlier onset, cystic cervical nodes and basaloid carcinoma histopathology. Detection of intratumoral viral DNA is essential to confirm the role of HPV, and E6/E7 mRNA expression is the most relevant indicator for stratification. Several methods can reveal intratumoral oncogenic HPV DNA, but PCR with hybridization is the most sensitive and most widely used. According to several reports, prognosis in terms of survival and locoregional control is better in HPV-positive oropharyngeal carcinoma than in oropharyngeal carcinoma associated with smoking and alcohol consumption. The future lies in vaccination, but further studies will determine whether the rate of oropharyngeal carcinoma falls in women vaccinated against cervical cancer.     

Chemotherapy for head and neck cancer

This overview of the role of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer is based on clinical trials conducted at The Princess Margaret Hospital and on a critical review of the literature. For recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma, no drug or combination has been found superior to methotrexate, which in large series gives transient responses in about 25% of patients. Reports of higher rates of response have not correlated with increased survival, and response rates from many series have been inflated by the use of poor and variable criteria of response or by inappropriate exclusion of patients. Chemotherapy may lead to high rates of response when used initially as part of combined modality treatment with radiation and/or surgery, but longterm benefit has not yet been demonstrated. Chemotherapy should not be considered part of standard management for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer, and should be used as part of primary treatment for loco-regional disease only in the context of large, well designed clinical trials.