Treatment outcomes of transoral robotic and non-robotic surgeries to treat oropharyngeal,hypopharyngeal, and supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma: A multi-center retrospective observational study in Japan

ObjectivesThe aim of this multicenter retrospective cohort study was to compare efficacy and subsequent postoperative treatment between transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and any non-robotic transoral surgery in Japanese patients with early oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), hypopharyngeal SCC (HPSCC), or supraglottic SCC (SGSCC).Materials and methodsClinical information and surgical outcomes were compared between patients with early-stage OPSCC, HPSCC, and SGSCC who underwent TORS (TORS cohort) and those who underwent non-robotic transoral surgery, including transoral videolaryngoscopic surgery (TOVS), endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery (ELPS), and transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) (non-robotic cohort). The data of the Head and Neck Cancer Registry of Japan (registry cohort) were used to validate the comparison. The main outcomes were the presence of positive margins under pathology and the requirement for postoperative therapy, including radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy.ResultsSixty-eight patients in the TORS cohort, 236 patients in the non-robotic cohort, and 1,228 patients in the registry cohort were eligible for this study. Patients in the TORS cohort were more likely to have oropharyngeal tumor disease and T2/3 disease than those in the other cohorts (P<0.001 and P=0.052, respectively). The TORS cohort had significantly fewer patients with positive surgical margins than the non-robotic cohort (P=0.018), as well as fewer patients who underwent postoperative treatment, although the difference was not significant (P=0.069). In the subgroup analysis of patients with OPSCC, a total of 57 patients in the TORS cohort, 73 in the non-robotic cohort, and 171 in the registry cohort were eligible for the present study. Patients with OPSCC who underwent TORS were more likely to have lateral wall lesions than those in the other cohorts (P=0.003). The TORS cohort also had significantly fewer patients with positive surgical margins than the non-robotic cohort (P=0.026), and no patients in the TORS cohort underwent any postoperative treatment for OPSCC, although the difference was not significant (P=0.177).ConclusionsOur results suggest that TORS leads to fewer positive surgical margins than non-robotic transoral surgeries. The clinical significance of TORS may be further validated through the results of all-case surveillance for patients who underwent TORS running in Japan in the future.     

Outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

ObjectiveTransoral robotic surgery (TORS) has evolved to a standard therapy modality for oropharyngeal carcinoma, especially in T1/ T2 tumors involving the base of the tongue due to its advantages compared with open surgery. However, knowledge about its benefits compared with transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) are scarce. This study compares oncological and functional results of TLM or TORS in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).MethodsThis retrospective analysis comprises all patients with OPSCC treated with TLM (n = 30) or TORS (n = 24) between April 2003 and May 2018 (follow-up 43 ± 38.3 months). Both treatment groups (TLM and TORS) were comparable in terms of the stage of the disease, prognosis-determining factors, and adjuvant therapy modalities.ResultsThere were no significant differences regarding to the resection status (p = 0.272), the rate of local- (p = 0.834) and distant- recurrence (p = 0.416), with a disease-free survival of 86.7 % and 87.5 %, respectively (p = 0.892). In addition, we could not confirm any differences regarding to operating time (p = 0.860), intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.660), inpatient stay (p = 0.585) and postoperative bleeding rate (p = 0.245). The frequency of tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy between both groups is comparable, with a longer duration of tube feeding in patients who have received TLM (p = 0.030).ConclusionIn conclusion, TORS allows for similar oncological outcomes compared with TLM at comparable perioperative risks. The postoperative swallowing function may benefit from TORS.     

Risk factors for gastrostomy tube dependence in transoral robotic surgery patients

ObjectivesTo determine the rate of gastrostomy tube dependence after transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and to determine which patient or surgical factors increase the likelihood of gastrostomy tube dependence.MethodsRetrospective chart review of all patients who underwent TORS for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) at a single institution from January 2011 through July 2016. Patients who underwent TORS for recurrent OPSCC were excluded. Primary outcome was gastrostomy tube (g-tube) dependence. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify risk factors for g-tube dependence at 3-months and 1-year.ResultsA total of 231 patients underwent TORS during the study period. At 3-month follow-up, 58/226 patients (25.7%) required g-tube. At 1-year and 2-year follow-up, 8/203 (3.9%) and 5/176 (2.8%), remained dependent on g-tube, respectively. Advanced T stage (T3) (OR = 6.07; 95% CI, 1.28–28.9) and discharge from the hospital with enteral access (OR = 7.50; 95% CI, 1.37–41.1) were independently associated with increased risk of postoperative gastrostomy tube dependence at 1 year on multivariable analysis.ConclusionsLong-term gastrostomy tube dependence following TORS is rare, particularly in patients that receive surgery alone. Patients with advanced T stage tumors have poorer functional outcomes. Early functional outcomes, as early as discharge from the hospital, are a strong predictor for long-term functional outcomes.     

Role of local flaps in the prevention of soft tissue necrosis after transoral robotic surgery for tonsillar cancer

ObjectiveSoft tissue necrosis (STN) can occur after transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with radiation therapy (RT). We investigated the usefulness of local flap reconstruction for preventing STN after TORS in patients with tonsillar cancer.MethodsThis case-control study retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological data of patients who underwent TORS for tonsillar cancer at a tertiary referral center. The incidence of STN was compared in patients who underwent secondary intention healing or local flap reconstruction, and factors predicting STN were identified.ResultsSTN occurred in 20 (25%) of 80 patients in the study. The incidence of STN was higher in the secondary intention healing than the flap reconstruction group. Mucositis grade (odds ratio [OR] 3.694, p = 0.02), RT dose (OR 4.667, p = 0.001), and secondary intention healing (OR 14.985, p = 0.035) were predictive factors for STN.ConclusionFlap reconstruction can prevent STN after TORS with RT in patients with tonsillar cancer. The use of local flaps preserves the minimally invasive nature of TORS.     

Transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer in the era of chemoradiation therapy

Over time, the primary treatment modality of oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (OPSCC) is intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), eventually associated with chemotherapy (CHT). This treatment modality is preferred for reduced impact on the quality of life rather than aggressive open surgical approaches. The advent of TransOral Robotic Surgery (TORS) has rediscovered the role of surgery in the treatment of OPSCC. Although the primary chemoradiation therapy (CRT) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) are competing for similar oncologic results, CRT may result in significant functional complaints such as severe dysphagia and feeding tube dependence and, on the other hand, TORS might result in surgical defects depending on the size of the resection and anatomic location. Nevertheless, TORS may intercept the locoregionally advanced population through pathologic downstaging as well as the potential for improvement in oncologic outcomes. The available reconstructive options allow an expanding role of this minimally invasive surgery, even in locally advanced tumours. Finally, the surgical management of OPSCC with TORS identifies areas of opportunity in shortening the overall treatment package time compared to traditional surgery.     

Transoral robotic surgery of the tongue base for obstructive sleep apnea: Preliminary results

IntroductionObstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) is a major public health issue. Robotic tongue-base reduction surgery is being developed, but needs assessment. The present study reports clinical and polygraphic results at 6 months’ follow-up.MethodSingle-center prospective study of 8 patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for severe OSAS.ResultsMean age was 47 years. M/F sex ratio was 5:3. Initial body-mass index ranged from 18 to 35 kg/m². Mean Epworth score was 12. Mean preoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 47 (range, 36–60). At 6 months, only 1 patient did not meet usual success criteria (AHI < 20 with > 50% decrease); 2 patients had residual AHI between 10 and 20; the other 5 had non-significant event rates.ConclusionTORS tongue-base reduction showed promising results, which need confirmation on long-term multicenter studies.     

National analysis of positive surgical margins in oropharyngeal salivary gland malignancies

ObjectivePositive surgical margins (PSM) are associated with worse survival in oropharyngeal salivary gland malignancies (OPSGM), but existing literature is limited to small series. Our objective was to identify risk factors for PSM using the national cancer database (NCDB), including a transoral robotic surgical (TORS) approach.MethodsNCDB was queried for patients with T1-T4a OPSGM undergoing resection between 2010 and 2017. Risk factors for PSM were determined using logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models.ResultsOf 785 patients, 165 (21.0 %) had PSM. Age, stage T4a tumors (OR 2.00, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.03–3.88), adenoid cystic carcinoma (OR 2.02, 95 % CI: 1.29–3.18), and treatment at lower volume institutions (OR 1.68, 95 % CI: 1.09–2.59) were all independently associated with PSM. TORS versus a non-robotic approach was not associated with PSM (23.9 % vs 20.4 %, p 0.358), respectively. Positive margins were independently associated with a worse OS than negative margins (HR 1.63, 95 % CI: 1.03–2.59). Adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with improved survival in high grade tumors with positive margins.ConclusionThis study represents the largest review assessing risk factors for positive margins in OPSGM. Histologic type (adenoid cystic carcinoma), age, T4a tumor stage and treatment at a lower volume institution were all predictive of positive margins. With increasing use of TORS over the last decade, there does not appear to be a greater risk of positive margins using this modality in select patients.Level of evidence: N/A.     

Comparison of radiofrequency and transoral robotic surgery in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome treatment

Introduction: Radiofrequency tissue ablation (RFTA) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) are the methods used in OSAS surgery. We also aimed to compare the advantages and disadvantages of RF and TORS as treatment methods applied in OSAS patients in terms of many parameters, especially apnea hypopnea index (AHI).

Materials and methods: Patients were classified by performing a detailed examination and evaluation before surgery. 20 patients treated with anterior palatoplasty and uvulectomy ?/+ tonsillectomy?+?RFTA (17 males, 3 females) and 20 patients treated with anterior palatoplasty and uvulectomy ?/+ tonsillectomy?+?TORS (16 males, 4 females) were included in the study. PSG was performed preoperatively and postoperatively in all patients and Epworth sleepiness questionnaire was applied. All operations were performed by the same surgeon and these surgical methods -RF and TORS- were compared in terms of many parameters.

Results: When the patients treated with RF and TORS were compared in operation time, length of hospitalization and duration of transition to oral feeding; all parameters were significantly greater in the patients treated with TORS.

Conclusions: TORS technique was found to be more successful than RF in terms of reduction of AHI value, correcting minimum arterial oxygen saturation value and decreasing Epworth Sleepiness Scale score.     

Transoral robotic surgery for head and neck carcinomas

The objective of this study was prospectively to assess the feasibility and safety of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in head and neck carcinomas and to report our learning curve and 2-year outcomes. Patients with oropharyngeal, hypopharyngeal and laryngeal tumors treated with TORS were prospectively included. We evaluated: the feasibility of TORS, robotic set-up time, transoral robotic surgery time, blood loss, surgical margins, tracheotomy, feeding tube, time to oral feeding and surgery-related complications. Twenty-three patients were treated for 25 carcinomas. Twenty-two patients underwent successful robotic resection for 24 carcinomas (96%). One patient required conversion to open surgery due to massive bleeding. The mean robotic set-up time was 25?min (range: 15–100?min) and mean TORS operating time was 70?min (range: 20–150?min). Positive margin of resection was observed in one patient (classified pT3) out of the 24 cancers and was managed by postoperative chemoradiation. No tracheotomy was performed. Three patients required prolonged intubation for a mean of 22?h. Two patients required a temporary gastrostomy (for 2 and 3.5?months, respectively). All other patients resumed oral feeding between the first and third postoperative day. The mean hospital stay was 6.4?days (range: 4–19?days). No postoperative complication occurred. Mean follow-up was 20?months (median: 19, range: 14–26). No death and no case of local or metastatic failure were observed. TORS is feasible and safe for the resection of selected head and neck carcinomas. The occurrence of intraoperative bleeding emphasizes the need for surgeons to be skilled in both transoral and open approaches.     

Comparative cost of transoral robotic surgery and radiotherapy (IMRT) in early stage tonsil cancer

PurposeTo compare treatment costs and cost-effectiveness for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in managing early stage tonsil cancer.Materials and methodsDirect treatment costs for surgery and IMRT were calculated from SEER-Medicare data for a cohort with clinically early stage (cT1/2N0) p16+ tonsillar squamous cell carcinoma from Kaiser Permanente Southern California Health Plan between 2012 and 2017. A Markov decision tree model with a 5-year time horizon was then applied to the cohort which incorporated costs associated with treatment, surveillance, and recurrence.ResultsIMRT cost up to $19,000 more (35%) than TORS in direct treatment costs. When input into the Markov model, TORS dominated IMRT with lower cost and better effectiveness over a range of values.ConclusionTORS is a more cost-effective treatment method than IMRT in early stage (cT1/2N0) tonsil cancer.     

Assessment of intraoperative safety in transoral robotic surgery

INTRODUCTION: Robotic technology has been safely integrated into thoracic and abdominopelvic surgery, and the early experience has been very promising with very rare complications related to robotic device failure. Recently, several reports have documented the technical feasibility of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with the daVinci Surgical System. Proposed pharyngeal and laryngeal applications include radical tonsillectomy, base-of-tongue resection, supraglottic laryngectomy, and phonomicrosurgery. The safety of transoral placement of the robotic endoscope and instruments has not been established. Potential risks specific to the transoral use of the surgical robot include facial skin laceration, tooth injury, mucosal laceration, mandible fracture, cervical spine fracture, and ocular injury. We hypothesize that these particular risks of transoral surgery are similar with robotic assistance compared with conventional transoral surgery. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, we attempted to intentionally injure a human cadaver with the daVinci Surgical System by impaling the facial skin and pharyngeal and laryngeal mucosa with the robotic instruments and endoscope. We also attempted to extract or fracture teeth and fracture the cadaver's mandible and cervical spine by applying maximal pressure and torque with the robotic arms. Experiments were documented with still and video photography. RESULTS: Impaling the cadaver's skin and mucosa resulted in only superficial lacerations. Tooth, mandible, and cervical spine fracture could not be achieved. CONCLUSIONS: Initial experiments performing TORS on a human cadaver with the daVinci Surgical System demonstrate a safety profile similar to conventional transoral surgery. Additionally, we discuss several strategies to increase patient safety in TORS.     

Robotics and telesurgery in otolaryngology

This article reviews the use of robotic technology for otolaryngologic surgery. The authors discuss the development of the technology and its current uses in the operating room. They address procedures such as oropharyngeal transoral robotic surgery (TORS), laryngeal TORS, and thyroidectomy, and also note the role of robotics in teaching.     

Análisis crítico de la cirugía robótica laríngea

In recent years, transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with the Da Vinci robot has been used for the removal of laryngeal cancers with the objective to improve functional and aesthetic outcomes without worsening survival. The advantages of TORS are described in this article. However, its disadvantages, mainly high cost amongst others, do not make robotic surgery the current treatment of choice for laryngeal tumours; transoral laser surgery is superior in most cases. Major technical improvements are expected. Smaller, more ergonomic, new-generation robots better adapted to the head and neck will probably be available in the near future.     

Transoral robotic surgery for the management of head and neck tumors: learning curve

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is an emerging technique for the treatment of head and neck tumors. The objective of this study is to describe our first steps and present our experience on the technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of TORS for the treatment of selected malignant lesions. From April 2008 to September 2009, 24 patients were enrolled in this prospective trial. Inclusion criteria were: adults with T1, T2 and selected T3 tumors involving the oral cavity, pharynx, and supraglottic larynx and a signed informed consent was obtained from the patient. Exclusion criteria were: tumors not accessible to TORS after unsuccessful attempts to expose properly the lesion to operate. The ethical committee’s approval was obtained to perform this study. Twenty-four patients were included in this study: 10 supraglottic tumors, 10 pharyngeal tumors and 4 oral cavity tumors. Nine patients had T1 tumors, 12 had T2 tumors, and 1 patient had a T3 tumor. In all cases, tumor resection could be performed by robotic surgery exclusively and negative resection margins were achieved with control by frozen section. None of them received intraoperative reconstruction. None of the patients required tracheotomy. There was no intraoperative complication related to the use of the robot. The average setup time was 24 ± 14 min (range 10–60 min). The average surgical time was 67 ± 46 min (range 12–180 min). Surgical and setup time decreased after the first cases. The mean hospital stay was 9 days. Oral feeding was resumed at 3 days. TORS seems to be a safe, feasible, minimally invasive treatment modality for malignant head and neck tumors with a short learning curve for surgeons already experienced in endoscopic surgery.     

Transoral robotic surgery: supraglottic partial laryngectomy

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the feasibility of performing transoral supraglottic partial laryngectomy with robotic instrumentation. METHODS: Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) was performed on 3 human patients with supraglottic carcinoma in a prospective human trial. The study was approved by our institutional review board and involved the da Vinci Surgical Robot (Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunnyvale, California). RESULTS: All procedures were completed robotically. The median overall operation time to perform the robotic procedure was 120 minutes (range, 1:32:48 to 2:58:18), including 18 minutes (range, 00:6:07 to 00:30:39) for exposure and robotic positioning. There were no intraoperative or postoperative complications or surgical mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary results of our series suggest that application of the da Vinci robotic surgical system for TORS to supraglottic partial laryngectomy is technically feasible and relatively safe. Furthermore, TORS provides excellent surgical exposure that allows complete tumor resection. Most importantly, TORS provides an alternative to open approaches and "conventional" transoral supraglottic partial laryngectomy.     

Time course of subacute pain after transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma versus traditional bilateral tonsillectomy in adults – a case–control study

Objective: To examine pain after Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) versus traditional bilateral tonsillectomy in adults.

Methods: Pain evolvement was assessed in a prospective case–control design of 16 consecutive patients treated with TORS for early stage OPSCC versus 12 patients, who underwent bilateral tonsillectomy on suspicion of malignant disease. The TORS group received an optimized analgesia regime of preoperative oral celecoxib and gabapentin, intra- and postoperative high-dose intravenous dexamethasone, and regular postoperative oral contalgin, gabapentin, celecoxib, paracetamol and rescue morphine. The tonsillectomy group received the departmental standard analgesia regime with low-dose preoperative oral dexamethasone, celecoxib and paracetamol. Postoperative regular analgesia consisted of oral NSAID and paracetamol with weak opioids prescribed as required. Pain intensity was recorded at rest and during swallowing twice a day.

Results: The median pain intensity on postoperative day (POD) 1–4 was 2 in the TORS group versus 4.5 in the tonsillectomy group. From POD 5-10 median pain intensity was 3.5 and 4, respectively. The median length of stay was 5 days in the TORS group and less than 24?hours in the tonsillectomy group.

Conclusion: With an optimized analgesia regime TORS for OPSCC can be performed with postoperative pain levels comparable to bilateral tonsillectomy in adults.     

Transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Principles and technique

ObjectiveThe present study is a review of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).MethodsThe review presents the experience of the robotic center that developed the technique with regards to patient selection, surgical method, and post-operative care. In addition, the review provides results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the complications and clinical outcomes of TORS when applied in the management of OSAHS.ResultsThe rate of success, defined as 50% reduction of pre-operative AHI and an overall AHI <20 events/h, is achieved in up to 76.6% of patients with a range between 53.8% and 83.3%. The safety of this approach is reasonable as the main complication (bleeding) affected 4.2% of patients (range 4.2%–5.3%). However, transient dysphagia (7.2%; range 5%–14%) does compromise the quality of life and must be discussed with patients preoperatively.ConclusionsTORS for the treatment of OSAHS appears to be a promising and safe procedure for patients seeking an alternative to traditional therapy. Appropriate patient selection remains an important consideration for successful implementation of this novel surgical approach requiring further research.     

Transoral robotic surgery vs. endoscopic partial midline glossectomy for obstructive sleep apnea

ObjectiveTo compare sleep-related outcomes in obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) patients following base of tongue resection via robotic surgery and endoscopic midline glossectomy.MethodsThis was a retrospective study. A total of 114 robotic and 37 endoscopic midline glossectomy surgeries were performed between July 2010 and April 2015 as part of single or multilevel surgery. Patients were excluded for indications other than sleep apnea or if complete sleep studies were not obtained. Thus, 45 robotic and 16 endoscopic surgeries were included in the analysis.ResultsIn the robotic surgery group there were statistically significant improvements in AHI [(44.4 ± 22.6) events/h–(14.0 ± 3.0) events/h, P < 0.001] Epworth Sleepiness Scale (12.3 ± 4.6 to 4.5 ± 2.9, P < 0.001), and O₂ nadir (82.0% ± 6.1% to 85.0% ± 5.4%, P < 0.001). In the endoscopic group there were also improvements in AHI (48.7 ± 30.2 to 27.4 ± 31.9, P = 0.06), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (12.6 ± 5.5 to 8.3 ± 4.5, P = 0.08), and O₂ nadir (80.2% ± 8.6% to 82.7% ± 6.5%, P = 0.4). Surgical success rate was 75.6% and 56.3% in the robotic and endoscopic groups, respectively. Greater volume of tissue removed was predictive of surgical success in the robotic cases (10.3 vs. 8.6 ml, P = 0.02).ConclusionsBoth robotic surgery and endoscopic techniques for tongue base reduction improve objective measures of sleep apnea. Greater success rates may be achieved with robotic surgery compared to traditional methods.     

Clinical predictors of revision surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis within 5-year follow-up

BackgroundChronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) remains a difficult-to-cure disease. The aim of this study was to determine the potential long-term predictors of revision sinus surgery for CRSwNP.MethodsProspectively gathered patients with bilateral CRSwNP who received primary endoscopic sinus surgery were enrolled. Clinical variables, including the preoperative Lund-Mackay score (LMS), were collected to clarify possible risk factors for revision surgery within a 5-year follow-up. The symptomatic burden was measured using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) before and 1 year after surgery. Further survival analysis was performed to present the revision-free survival in Kaplan−Meier plotting.ResultsEighty four qualified patients were identified and all of them experienced significant improvement in VAS after primary surgery. The 5-year revision rate was 19.05%, and the mean time of revision surgery was 25.31 ± 17.11 months postoperatively. Nasal allergy (OR = 9.287; p = 0.011) and LMS (OR = 1.29; p = 0.06) were found to be the independent risk factors for revision surgery. The discriminatory power of LMS for revision surgery was acceptable (AUC = 0.79) with the best cutoff point located at LMS > 13.5. Patients with both nasal allergy and LMS≧14 had only half of revision-free survival in comparison to overall survival (38.1% vs. 80.95%, p < 0.001).ConclusionsIn patients with CRSwNP who have concurrent nasal allergy and higher preoperative LMS may indicate an advanced disease status and eventually be in a high risk of revision surgery after a long-term follow-up. An outcome-based staging system will be helpful in the future to improve the prognosis for CRSwNP.