Results of a multicenter randomized phase II trial of thalidomide and prednisone maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma after autologous stem cell transplant.

We report a multicenter, randomized phase II trial conducted to assess the tolerability of combined thalidomide and prednisone maintenance in multiple myeloma. Eligibility required administration of melphalan (200 mg/m2) with blood stem cell support within 1 year of treatment onset and initiation of maintenance within 60 to 100 days after stem cell infusion. All patients received 50 mg of prednisone by mouth on alternate days and thalidomide at a starting dose of either 200 or 400 mg daily by mouth. The primary end point was the incidence of dropout or dose reduction due to treatment toxicity within 6 months. Sixty-seven patients were enrolled. Median follow-up is 36.8 months. The primary end point was reached by 31% of patients on the 200 mg of thalidomide arm and 64% of patients on the 400 mg of thalidomide arm. Allowing for dose reduction, 76% of patients assigned to the 200 mg of thalidomide arm and 41% of patients assigned to the 400 mg of thalidomide arm remained on any maintenance therapy 18 months after registration. Eighty-eight percent of all patients dose-reduced thalidomide and 72% of all patients dose-reduced prednisone within 2 years of beginning maintenance. The median progression-free survival post-transplant is 32.3 months, or 42.2 months from diagnosis. Only the 200 mg of thalidomide arm of this trial met our definition of a tolerable maintenance therapy, defined as no dose reductions or discontinuation due to toxicity in at least 65% of patients for a minimum of 6 months, thus establishing a dosing schedule for phase III trials.     

Lenalidomide versus bortezomib maintenance after frontline autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

Lenalidomide (LEN) maintenance (MT) post autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is standard of care in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) but has not been compared to other agents in clinical trials. We retrospectively compared bortezomib (BTZ; n = 138) or LEN (n = 183) MT from two subsequent GMMG phase III trials. All patients received three cycles of BTZ-based triplet induction and post-ASCT MT. BTZ MT (1.3 mg/m² i.v.) was administered every 2 weeks for 2 years. LEN MT included two consolidation cycles (25 mg p.o., days 1–21 of 28 day cycles) followed by 10–15 mg/day for 2 years. The BTZ cohort more frequently received tandem ASCT (91% vs. 33%) due to different tandem ASCT strategies. In the LEN and BTZ cohort, 43% and 46% of patients completed 2 years of MT as intended (p = 0.57). Progression-free survival (PFS; HR = 0.83, p = 0.18) and overall survival (OS; HR = 0.70, p = 0.15) did not differ significantly with LEN vs. BTZ MT. Patients with <nCR after first ASCT were assigned tandem ASCT in both trials. In patients with <nCR and tandem ASCT (LEN: n = 54 vs. BTZ: n = 84), LEN MT significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.61, p = 0.04) but not OS (HR = 0.46, p = 0.09). In conclusion, the significant PFS benefit after eliminating the impact of different tandem ASCT rates supports the current standard of LEN MT after ASCT.Subject terms: Myeloma, Medical research     

Lenalidomide and low‐dose dexamethasone in Japanese patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A phase II study

In the FIRST trial (MM‐020), lenalidomide plus low‐dose dexamethasone (Rd) reduced the risk of disease progression or death compared with combination melphalan–prednisone–thalidomide. As the FIRST trial did not include any Japanese patients, the efficacy and safety of continuous treatment with Rd was evaluated in 26 Japanese patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in a single‐arm, multicenter, open‐label phase II trial (MM‐025). Patients received lenalidomide on days 1–21 of each 28‐day cycle, with a starting dose of 25 mg/day (dose adjusted for renal impairment), and 40 mg/day dexamethasone (dose adjusted for age) on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of each 28‐day cycle until disease progression or discontinuation for any reason. In the efficacy evaluable population, overall response rate was 87.5%, including 29.2% of patients who achieved a complete response/very good partial response. Median durations of response, progression‐free survival and overall survival have not been reached. The most common grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (23%) and anemia (19%). The efficacy and safety of Rd were consistent with data from larger studies, including the FIRST trial, thereby supporting the use of Rd continuous in Japanese patients with NDMM who are ineligible for stem cell transplantation.     

Phase II trial of syncopated thalidomide, lenalidomide, and weekly dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

IntroductionOver the past decade, the novel agents thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib have emerged as effective treatment in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Initially used in the relapse setting, these agents have been incorporated into frontline treatment algorithms. They have been combined in doublets with corticosteroids, in triplets with alkylators, or with each other. Because thalidomide and lenalidomide have different clinical activity and toxicity profiles, we designed a trial to evaluate a syncopated schedule of thalidomide and lenalidomide with weekly dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed MM to determine response and toxicity.Patients and MethodsTwenty-two patients with newly diagnosed MM were treated with syncopated thalidomide (200 mg on days 1-7 and 15-21), lenalidomide (25 mg on days 8-14 and 22-28 for the first cycle and 50 mg on the same schedule for subsequent cycles) with weekly dexamethasone (40 mg). Each cycle lasted 28 days. MM parameters were assessed at the end of each cycle. It was intended that the patients proceed to stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation after 4 cycles of therapy.ResultsThe median number of cycles administered was 3.5. The overall response was 68%. The regimen was well tolerated by the majority of the patients; only patient discontinued treatment because of toxicity.ConclusionWe conclude that a syncopated schedule of thalidomide and lenalidomide with weekly dexamethasone was tolerated well, with no unexpected toxicities. However the response rate, even using lenalidomide at 50 mg, was not superior to standard dosing of thalidomide or lenalidomide plus dexamethasone.     

Induction therapy prior to autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an update

The current standard of care model for newly diagnosed fit multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients is the sequential treatment of induction, high dose melphalan, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and maintenance. Adequate induction is required to achieve good disease control and induce deep response rates while minimizing toxicity as a bridge to transplant. Doublet induction regimens have greatly fallen out of favor, with current international guidelines favoring triplet or quadruplet induction regimens built around the backbone of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and dexamethasone (Vd). In fact, the updated 2021 European Haematology Association (EHA) and European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) clinical practice guidelines recommend the use of either lenalidomide-Vd (VRd), or daratumumab-thalidomide-Vd (Dara-VTd) as first-line options for transplant-eligible NDMM patients, and when not available, thalidomide-Vd (VTd) or cyclophosphamide-Vd (VCd) as acceptable alternatives. Quadruplet regimens featuring anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies are extremely promising and remain heavily investigated, as is the incorporation of more recent proteasome inhibitors such as carfilzomib. This review will focus on induction therapies prior to ASCT examining the latest data and guidelines on triplet and quadruplet regimens.Subject terms: Myeloma, Targeted therapies     

Symptom burden after autologous stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is the most common indication for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in the U.S. and can be associated with substantial morbidity. Thorough assessment and understanding of symptoms and risk factors for symptom development after ASCT are logical first steps toward developing strategies aimed at reducing the symptom burden associated with this procedure. METHODS: The authors performed a prospective evaluation of symptom burden among 64 patients with myeloma who underwent ASCT. Symptom data were collected using the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) at 4 time points: baseline, the day of stem cell infusion (Day 0), nadir of counts, and Day 30. Univariate analysis was performed to correlate pretransplantation variables with post-transplantation symptom burden at these time points. RESULTS: MDASI scores increased significantly throughout transplantation, with most patients returning to baseline by Day 30 after the procedure. Patients with the highest MDASI scores at baseline had the highest MDASI scores at nadir (P= .02). Patients with prolonged time to transplantation and women had a trend toward higher nadir global symptom severity scores. These groups, as well as patients aged >60 years, had a trend toward higher nadir interference scores. CONCLUSIONS: ASCT for MM was associated with significant but reversible symptom burden during the first 30 days, and the baseline symptom burden was the most important predictor of symptom burden after transplantation. The MDASI was useful as a tool for following the symptom burden associated with ASCT and may be used to evaluate interventions aimed at reducing transplantation-related morbidity in these patients.     

Early versus delayed autologous transplantation after immunomodulatory agents-based induction therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND:

Early versus delayed autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) results in comparable overall survival in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who receive alkylator‐based therapies. It is not clear whether this paradigm holds true in the context of new therapies, such as immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs).

METHODS:

The authors studied 290 patients with untreated MM who received IMiD‐based initial therapy, including 123 patients who received thalidomide‐dexamethasone (TD) and 167 patients who received lenalidomide‐dexamethasone (LD) induction before SCT. Patients who underwent a stem cell harvest attempt were considered transplantation‐eligible and were included. SCT within 12 months of diagnosis and within 2 months of harvest were considered early SCT (n = 173; 60%). SCT >12 months after diagnosis was considered delayed SCT (n = 112; 40%).

RESULTS:

In the delayed SCT group, 42 patients had undergone SCT at the time of the current report, and the median estimated time to SCT was 5.3 months and 44.5 months in the early SCT and delayed SCT groups, respectively. The 4‐year overall survival rate from diagnosis was 73% in both groups (P = .3) and was comparable in those who received TD (68% vs 64%, respectively) and those who received LD (82% vs 86%, respectively) as initial therapy. The time to progression after SCT was similar between the early and delayed SCT groups (20 months vs 16 months; P value nonsignificant).

CONCLUSIONS:

The current results indicated that, in transplantation‐eligible patients who receive IMiDs as initial therapy followed by early stem cell mobilization, delayed SCT results in similar overall survival compared with early SCT. It is noteworthy that an excellent 4‐year survival rate of >80% was observed among transplantation‐eligible patients who received initial therapy with LD regardless of the timing of transplantation. Cancer 2011;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Bortezomib (Velcade) for progressive myeloma after autologous stem cell transplantation and thalidomide

Twenty-one patients with multiple myeloma, all relapsed after frontline autologous stem cell transplantation and all relapsed again after or resistant to thalidomide (employed as second line treatment) received bortezomib (1.3 mg/m(2) body surface twice weekly for 2 weeks followed by an interval of 10-12 days) without adjunct of steroids as third line therapy. Three patients died of progressive disease during the first 2 cycles with bortezomib. Eighteen patients received at least 2 cycles and were evaluated for response. According to EBMT criteria, two complete (negative immunofixation) and seven partial (reduction of M-component > 50-75%) remissions were achieved (ITT response rate 42.8%). Duration of response lasted from 2 to 14+ months. Grades 3-4 toxicities (thrombocytopenia, leucopenia, peripheral neuropathy and vasculitis) were observed in seven patients, but no patient interrupted the treatment due to side effects. We conclude that bortezomib alone may induce high quality responses as third line salvage therapy with acceptable toxicity in a significant proportion of homogeneously pre-treated myeloma patients with progressive disease after autologous transplantation and thalidomide.     

The evolving role of maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Maintenance therapy after autologous transplantation is a standard of care in newly diagnosed myeloma. However, there is no universal answer to the question of which maintenance strategy should be pursued after ASCT?

Areas covered: We conducted a MEDLINE search using the medical subject headings ‘multiple myeloma’, ‘autologous transplantation’ and ‘maintenance’ to identify available data from clinical trials on the role of different maintenance strategies after autologous transplantation for the newly diagnosed disease.

Expert opinion: A large meta-analysis demonstrated that lenalidomide prolongs progression-free and overall survival after autologous transplantation compared to observation/placebo. Further trials confirmed that lenalidomide maintenance increases rates of high-quality responses and one study demonstrated that lenalidomide maintenance improves outcomes regardless of cytogenetic risk. Although lenalidomide can cause side effects and is associated with an increased risk of second primary malignancies, its benefits outweigh the mentioned risks. The proteasome inhibitors ixazomib and bortezomib may partially overcome the negative effects of high-risk cytogenetics. Future trials will combine different agents and monoclonal antibodies during maintenance and will investigate whether minimal residual disease status can guide maintenance duration.     

Role of autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has been shown to improve survival in patients with multiple myeloma in randomized trials and is the standard of care for eligible patients. Recent randomized trials suggest a survival benefit with tandem ASCT, notably for patients failing to achieve a very good response to initial transplantation. Other randomized trials, as well as smaller phase II trials and retrospective studies, have allowed us to improve the process of ASCT in terms of the stem cell collection, conditioning regimens, and extension of the therapy to a wider patient population. The introduction of thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bortezomib have changed the paradigm for treatment of myeloma and significantly improved the outcome for these patients. The role of ASCT will clearly be redefined in the coming years with improvements in other therapies.     

大剂量地塞米松联合硼替佐米及沙利度胺治疗多发性骨髓瘤合并肾衰竭的临床研究

 【摘要】　目的　观察以大剂量地塞米松为基础的常规化疗加用硼替佐米及沙利度胺治疗后对多发性骨髓瘤合并急性肾衰竭患者的影响。方法　对23例伴肾衰竭的新发骨髓瘤患者均采用大剂量地塞米松加用硼替佐米和沙利度胺治疗,观察患者在用药前后肾损害的改善情况。结果　严重肾衰竭的12例患者中逆转1例,好转6例,总有效率58.3 %;肾衰竭的11例患者中逆转4例,好转5例,总有效率81.8 %。全部病例总有效率69.5 %（16／23）。对原发病骨髓瘤治疗总有效率60.9 %（14／23）。中位显效时间为2个月（1～5个月）。3年总体生存率为56.5 %,中位生存期34.4个月。结论　大剂量地塞米松联合硼替佐米和沙利度胺对新发骨髓瘤患者的肾衰竭逆转率高,对原发病治疗效果较好,不良反应少、安全可靠、见效快,可作为一线治疗用药。     

Cyclophosphamide plus dexamethasone is an efficient initial treatment before high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of a randomized comparison with vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone

BACKGROUND: Today, intensive therapy that includes high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered standard therapy in younger patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. When the current trial was initiated, combined vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) was the most commonly used induction therapy before ASCT and yielded rapid major responses without interfering with stem cell harvest. However, the administration of VAD demands a central venous access, and well-described toxicities are associated with the therapy. This randomized trial, which was initiated in 2001 by the Nordic Myeloma Study Group, was an attempt to bring a larger portion of patients to ASCT more quickly. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive either 3 cycles of VAD or 2 courses of cyclophosphamide plus dexamethasone (Cy-Dex) (cyclophosphamide at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) on Day 1 and dexamethasone at a dose of 40 mg per day on Days 1-4 and 9-12, repeated on Day 22) as initial therapy followed by stem cell mobilization, harvest, and finally ASCT. RESULTS: No significant difference was observed in the proportion of patients undergoing ASCT (VAD [86%] vs Cy-Dex [87%]). During the first 4 months after the initiation of therapy, the mortality rates were 5.8% for VAD and 1.9% for Cy-Dex (P = .08). The response rates after ASCT were comparable (partial response or better: VAD: 80% vs Cy-Dex: 81%). In both groups, the median event-free survival was 29 months, and the overall survival rate at 3 years was 75%. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that Cy-Dex before ASCT has efficacy comparable to that of VAD. It also demonstrated that a short course of alkylator therapy using cyclophosphamide does not affect stem cell harvest or transplantation.     

Coagulation profiles and thromboembolic events of bortezomib plus thalidomide and dexamethasone therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at relatively high risk of developing thromboembolic event (TEE), especially during treatment with immnomodulatory agents. We characterized coagulation profiles and evaluate the incidence of TEE associated with the combination therapy of bortezomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone (VTD) in Chinese patients with newly diagnosed MM. The results indicated that the platelet count and platelet aggregation induced by the agonists were decreased after a short exposure to bortezomib in vivo. The incidence of TEE was low in VTD therapy for an overall rate of 3%. We do not recommend routine thromboprophylaxis for VTD therapy in Chinese patients with MM.     

Thalidomide in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: influence of thalidomide treatment on peripheral blood stem cell collection yield.

In a phase III randomized, multicenter study, the German-speaking Myeloma-Multicenter Group (GMMG) and the Dutch-Belgian Hemato-Oncology Cooperative Group (HOVON) group investigated the influence of thalidomide (Thal) on the outcome of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection in multiple myeloma (MM) before peripheral autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT). We analyzed the data of 398 myeloma patients after induction with Thal, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (TAD) in comparison with vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone (VAD) followed by mobilization with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, dexamethasone (CAD) and PBSC collection. Within both the study groups, patients treated with TAD showed to collect significantly fewer CD34(+) cells compared with VAD (GMMG, TAD: median 9.8 x 10(6)/kg; range 2.0-33.6; VAD: median 10.9 x 10(6)/kg range 3.0-36.0; P=0.02) (HOVON, TAD: median 7.4 x 10(6)/kg; range 2.0-33.0; VAD: median 9.4 x 10(6)/kg; range 0.0-48.7; P=0.009). However, engraftment after peripheral autologous stem cell transplantation showed no difference between Thal and VAD groups. We conclude that Thal as a part of induction regimen is associated with better response rates (GMMG-HD3: CR/PR 79%, VAD: CR/PR 58%; HOVON-50: TAD: CR/PR 81%, VAD: CR/PR 61%), but significantly affects the yield of PBSC collection. Nevertheless, the number of total CD34(+) cells collected was sufficient for double autologous transplantation in 82% of the Thal patients, with at least 2.5 x 10(6)/kg CD34(+) cells.     

Autologous stem cell transplantation for elderly patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the era of novel agents

BackgroundHigh-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is considered the standard of care for multiple myeloma (MM) patients <65 years. Safety and outcome of ASCT for patients >65 years is currently uncertain, especially since the introduction of novel agents for induction and maintenance therapy. Furthermore, there are no conclusive data available on risk assessment in elderly patients treated with HDT.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 202 patients ≥60 years with newly diagnosed MM who underwent ASCT at our institution. Patients were stratified by age into three groups (60–64, 65–69 and 70–75 years). For safety assessment, we compared data about hospitalization, hematopoetic reconstitution and early mortality. Remission before and after ASCT was analyzed according to age and application of novel agents. Event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed to identify impact of age, remission before/after ASCT and maintenance therapy as well as ISS score and cytogenetic aberrations on outcome in elderly patients.ResultsThe assessment of safety, remission before/after ASCT as well as EFS and OS showed no significant differences between the three groups (median EFS: 60–64 years: 27 months; 65–69 years: 23 months; 70–75 years: 23 months; median OS: not reached). Patients receiving novel agents as part of induction therapy achieved significantly higher nCR + CR rates than patients treated without novel agents. In Cox regression analysis, ISS and cytogenetics as well as remission after ASCT had the highest prognostic impact on EFS and OS. Maintenance therapy was associated with longer EFS in uni- and multivariate analyses.ConclusionASCT is feasible for selected patients >65 and >70 years without increased mortality. Age at transplantation has no prognostic significance on outcome after ASCT. Novel agents during induction therapy and maintenance therapy improves outcome of older patients eligible for ASCT. ISS and cytogenetic analysis should be carried out routinely for risk assessment.     

Sustained molecular remission by non-myeloablative stem cell transplantation after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a patient with multiple myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) is refractory to conventional chemotherapy. To achieve a sustained complete remission, we performed planned non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation (NST) after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in a patient with stage III MM. Autologous HSCT was performed using high-dose melphalan after conventional chemotherapy, followed by NST from an HLA-identical sibling using low-dose total body irradiation (200 cGy) for conditioning. Cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil were used for graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. Acute GVHD was transiently seen in the skin and intestine, while, in addition, mild chronic GVHD was seen in the oral mucosa and skin. Complete donor chimerism was achieved and the disappearance of tumor-derived monoclonal B cells was confirmed based on an analysis of immunoglobulin light chain messenger signals on day 156 when chronic GVHD occurred. The clinical course in this case strongly suggested the existence of a graft-vs-myeloma effect.     

自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性骨髓瘤

 自体造血干细胞移植（ASCT）治疗多发性骨髓瘤进展较大。与常规方案相比，ASCT提高了患者的完全缓解（CR）、无事件生存（EFS）和总生存率（OS）。高龄、肾衰竭并非ASCT的禁忌证。双次ASCT可提高CR率，对长期EFS率、OS率影响仍需观察。改进预处理方案、选择移植时机、改进移植后巩固治疗可以提高疗效。     

新药诱导后自体造血干细胞移植对以荧光原位杂交分层的多发性骨髓瘤患者的价值

 　目的　评价新药诱导后自体造血干细胞移植（ASCT）对荧光原位杂交（FISH）标危及高危多发性骨髓瘤患者生存的影响。方法　回顾性分析74例多发性骨髓瘤患者,均接受以硼替佐米和（或）沙利度胺为主的诱导化疗,按FISH检测结果及诱导后是否接受ASCT分为标危移植组、标危化疗组、高危移植组及高危化疗组4组,通过生存分析分别评价ASCT对标危及高危患者生存的影响。结果　74例患者经新药诱导后总缓解率为91.9 %（68／74）,接近完全缓解（nCR）+ 完全缓解（CR）率为62.2 %（46／74）。FISH标危的患者与高危的患者诱导后缓解率分别为93.2 %（41／44）与86.7 %（26／30）（P＝0.592）,nCR+CR率分别为56.8 %（25／44）与70.0 %（21／30）（P＝0.251）。FISH标危的患者中,接受移植的患者与接受化疗巩固的患者无进展生存（PFS）及总生存（OS）差异均无统计学意义（P值分别为0.642和0.652）,而FISH高危的患者中,接受移植的患者比接受化疗巩固的患者PFS延长19.7个月（P＝0.028）,OS延长12.5个月（P＝0.542）。结论　在以硼替佐米和（或）沙利度胺为主的方案诱导后,ASCT对 FISH标危多发性骨髓瘤患者的PFS和OS均没有影响,但可使FISH高危患者的PFS延长。