Contemporary Trends of Clinical Outcomes in Primary Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Postprocedure High-Risk Categories

ObjectiveWe aimed to analyze trends of 30-day readmission and find high-risk patients associated with increased risk of mortality, resource use, and readmission after primary left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Limited data exist on the contemporary trends of readmission rates and patients at a higher risk of worse outcomes after LVAD implantation.Methods and ResultsThis is a retrospective study of adults from the Nationwide Readmission Database who underwent primary durable LVAD implantation from 2010 to 2018. The main outcomes were 30-day readmission rates and their trends in patients with primary durable LVAD implantation from 2010 to 2018. This study also sought to identify patients at the highest risk for readmission, in-hospital mortality, and resource use. A total of 31,002 adults with primary durable LVAD implantation were included in the present analysis. Overall, 3808 patients (12.3%) died and 27,168 (87.6%) were discharged alive. Of those discharged alive, 8303 patients (30.6%) were readmitted within 30 days. The trend of 30-day all-cause readmission among LVAD implantation patients remained similar from 2010 to 2018 (P = .809). The in-hospital mortality rate during the index hospitalization decreased significantly (P = .014), and the mean cost of an index hospitalization increased (P = .031) during the study period. The patients with post-LVAD in-hospital cardiac, vascular, and thromboembolic complications (ie, high-risk patients) had the highest mortality, resource use, and readmission rates compared with patients without major complications.ConclusionsThis study found that the readmission rates associated with LVAD implantation did not change from 2010 to 2018 and identified high-risk patients who may benefit from closer monitoring after primary LVAD implantation.     

Percutaneous Versus Surgical Pulmonic Valve Implantation for Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Dysfunction

Background/purposePercutaneous pulmonic valve implantation (PPVI) is an alternative treatment strategy to surgical pulmonic valve implantation (SPVI) for right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) dysfunction. This study sought to compare outcomes of both treatment strategies.MethodsThe study population was extracted from the 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD) using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for PPVI and SPVI. Study outcomes included all-cause in-hospital mortality, length of index hospital stay (LOS), post-procedural bleeding, mechanical complications of heart valve prosthesis, vascular complications (VC), infective endocarditis (IE), total hospitalization charges, and 30-day readmission rates.ResultsA total of 975 patient discharges (176 in PPVI and 799 in SPVI group) were identified (average age 25.7 years; 57.5% male). PPVI was associated with significantly shorter median LOS (1 versus 5 days, p < 0.01), lower risk of bleeding (4.6% versus 26.4%, p < 0.01), and lower total hospitalization charges ($169,551.7 versus $210,681.8, p = 0.02). There was no significant difference between both groups in terms of all-cause in-hospital mortality (0% versus 1.4%, p = 0.12), mechanical complications of heart valve prosthesis (1.7% versus 2.0%, p = 0.78), VC (2.3% versus 2.0%, p = 0.82), IE (1.7% versus 3.1%, p = 0.31), or 30-day readmission rates (4.4% versus 7.6%, p = 0.16).ConclusionCompared with SPVI, PPVI was associated with shorter LOS, lower bleeding, and lower total charges. There was no significant difference between the two strategies in terms of all-cause in-hospital mortality, mechanical complications of heart valve prosthesis, VC, IE, or 30-day readmission rates.     

Burden of 30-Day Readmissions Associated With Discharge Against Medical Advice Among Inpatients in the United States

BackgroundDischarges against medical advice are common among inpatients in the United States. The impact of discharge against medical advice on readmission rates and subsequent hospitalization outcomes is uncertain. We sought to ascertain the effect of discharge against medical advice on 30-day readmission rates and outcomes of readmission.MethodsWe used the 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database to identify index hospitalizations among patients older than 18 years of age. The primary exposure variable was discharge against medical advice, and the primary outcome measure was all-cause unplanned 30-day readmission. We used multivariate hierarchical logistic regression modeling to ascertain the effect of discharge against medical advice on 30-day readmission rates.ResultsThere were an estimated 23,110,641 index hospitalizations nationwide with an overall unplanned 30-day readmission rate of 10.2%. 1.3% of index admissions resulted in a discharge against medical advice. Patients who were discharged against medical advice were younger (mean age 47.1 years vs 56.5 years, P < 0.001) with a higher proportion of males (61.1% vs 39.5%, P < 0.001) compared with patients with a routine discharge. Discharge against medical advice was associated with significantly higher odds of 30-day readmission (risk-adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-2.09, P < 0.001). Discharge against medical advice was associated with higher odds of readmission to a different hospital (OR 2.35, 95% CI 2.22-2.49, P < 0.001) and repeat discharge against medical advice after readmission (OR 18.41, 95% CI 17.46-19.41, P < 0.001). The most common cause of readmission after discharge against medical advice was alcohol-related disorders (9%). Hospital-level rates of discharge against medical advice ranged from 0% to 12.5%.ConclusionsDischarge against medical advice is associated with over twice the odds of all-cause unplanned 30-day readmission compared with routine discharge. There is large hospital-level variation in rates of discharge against medical advice. Interventions to reduce discharges against medical advice, particularly at hospitals with high rates of such discharges, may reduce the overall readmission burden in this challenging and high-risk patient population.     

Mortality and 30-Day Readmission Rates After Inpatient Leadless Pacemaker Implantation: Insights From a Nationwide Readmissions Database

BackgroundThis study aimed to provide real-world data on the rates, trends, and predictors of in-hospital complications and 30-day readmission following leadless pacemaker (LP) implantation.MethodsWe analysed leadless and conventional pacemaker implantations with the use of the all-payer, nationally representative Nationwide Readmissions Database from 2017 to 2019. The national trends of in-hospital mortality, in-hospital complications, and 30-day readmission rates after pacemaker implantation were analysed. Mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with in-hospital death and 30-day readmission in LP patients.ResultsA total of 137,732 admissions (age 78 years, IQR 70-85 years, 5986 LP implantations) were analysed. The in-hospital mortality, overall in-hospital complication, and 30-day readmission rates after LP implantations were 5.0%, 16%, and 16%, respectively. In LP recipients, the national estimate of in-hospital mortality declined from 10.9% in the second quarter of 2017 to 4.3% in the fourth quarter of 2019 (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the national estimate of overall complications declined from 20.6% in the second quarter of 2017 to 13.0% in the fourth quarter of 2019 (P < 0.001). In LP recipients, female sex, history of chronic kidney disease, heart failure, and malnutrition were factors associated with in-hospital death.ConclusionsAnalysis of the nationally representative claims database from the United States showed in-hospital mortality and complication rates (for LP implantation performed during hospitalisation) of 5.0% and 16%, respectively. Although these rates showed a decreasing trend over time, ongoing surveillance is needed for the safety of LP implantation.     

Association of early acute-phase rehabilitation initiation on outcomes among patients aged ≥90 years with acute heart failure

Background

Data on the potential benefit of acute-phase rehabilitation initiation in very old (aged ≥90) patients with acute heart failure (AHF) have been scarce.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, which is a nationwide inpatient database. This study included patients hospitalized for heart failure (HF) from January 2010 to March 2018, those aged ≥90 years, who had a length of stay of ≥3 days, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class of ≥II, and had not undergone major procedures under general anesthesia. Propensity score matching and generalized linear models were used to compare in-hospital mortality, length of stay, 30-day readmission rate due to HF, all-cause 30-day readmission, and improvement in activities of daily living (ADL) between patients with and without an acute-phase rehabilitation initiation, which is defined as the rehabilitation initiation within 2 days after hospital admission.

Results

Acute-phase rehabilitation was initiated in 8588 of 41,896 eligible patients. Propensity score matching created 8587 pairs. Patients with acute-phase rehabilitation initiation have lower in-hospital mortality (9.0% vs. 11.2%, p < 0.001). Acute-phase rehabilitation initiation was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.778; 95% confidence interval, 0.704–0.860). Patients with acute-phase rehabilitation initiation have a shorter median length of stay (17 days vs. 18 days, p < 0.001), lower 30-day readmission rate due to HF (5.5% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.011) and all-cause 30-day readmission (10.2% vs. 11.2%, p = 0.036), and better ADL improvement (49.7% vs. 46.9%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis revealed consistent results (sex, body mass index, NYHA class, and Barthel Index).

Conclusions

The acute-phase rehabilitation initiation was associated with improved short-term clinical outcomes in patients aged ≥90 years with AHF.     

Trends and Outcomes of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Renal and Liver Transplant Recipients: Insights From the United States National Inpatient and Readmission Database

Left atrial appendage occlusion using the Watchman device has emerged as an alternative treatment strategy for preventing strokes in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, there is no data on its safety and clinical outcomes in prior renal or liver transplant recipients. We included a total of 61,995 patients from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS, in-hospital outcomes) and 55,048 patients from the National Readmission Database (NRD, 30-day outcomes) who underwent percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO). From this group, 0.65% (n=405) and 0.62% (n=339) were renal and liver transplant recipients in NIS and NRD respectively. Transplant recipients were younger compared with non-transplant recipients (mean age 69 vs 77 years, P=<0.01). There was little difference in terms of in-hospital mortality (0% vs 0.2%, P=0.43), major complications (6.2% vs 5.6%, P=0.61), cardiovascular complications (2.5% vs 2.8%, P=0.73), neurological complications (1.2% vs 0.7%, P=0.21) or bleeding complications (1.2% vs 0.7%, P=0.99) between transplant vs. non-transplant patients. Based on the NRD database, 30-day readmission rate was not meaningfully different for transplant recipients undergoing LAAO (9.44%) when compared to non-transplant patients (8.12%, [log-rank, P=0.56]). There was no difference between 30-day major or cardiovascular complications, however vascular complication rates were significantly higher for transplant recipients (OR 2.56, 95% CI [(1.66-3.47]). Our study findings suggest that LAAO may be safe for patients with a prior renal or liver transplant in terms of major complications, cardiovascular complications, and all-cause readmission rates. However vascular complications may be higher in transplant recipients. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.     

Trends for Readmission and Mortality After Heart Failure Hospitalisation in Malaysia, 2007 to 2016

Background and objectives:Data on population-level outcomes after heart failure (HF) hospitalisation in Asia is sparse. This study aimed to estimate readmission and mortality after hospitalisation among HF patients and examine temporal variation by sex and ethnicity.Methods:Data for 105,399 patients who had incident HF hospitalisations from 2007 to 2016 were identified from a national discharge database and linked to death registration records. The outcomes assessed here were 30-day readmission, in-hospital, 30-day and one-year all-cause mortality.Results:Eighteen percent of patients (n = 16786) were readmitted within 30 days. Mortality rates were 5.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.1–5.4%), 11.2% (11.0–11.4%) and 33.1% (32.9–33.4%) for in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year mortality after the index admission. Age, sex and ethnicity-adjusted 30-day readmissions increased by 2% per calendar year while in-hospital and 30-day mortality declined by 7% and 4% per year respectively. One-year mortality rates remained constant during the study period. Men were at higher risk of 30-day readmission (adjusted rate ratio (RR) 1.16, 1.13–1.20) and one-year mortality (RR 1.17, 1.15–1.19) than women. Ethnic differences in outcomes were evident. Readmission rates were equally high in Chinese and Indians relative to Malays whereas Others, which mainly comprised Indigenous groups, fared worst for in-hospital and 30-day mortality with RR 1.84 (1.64–2.07) and 1.3 (1.21–1.41) relative to Malays.Conclusions:Short-term survival was improving across sex and ethnic groups but prognosis at one year after incident HF hospitalisation remained poor. The steady increase in 30-day readmission rates deserves further investigation.     

Plasma Volume Status and Its Association With In-Hospital and Postdischarge Outcomes in Decompensated Heart Failure

BackgroundPrior analyses suggest an association between formula-based plasma volume (PV) estimates and outcomes in heart failure (HF). We assessed the association between estimated PV status by the Duarte-ePV and Kaplan Hakim (KH-ePVS) formulas, and in-hospital and postdischarge clinical outcomes, in the ASCEND-HF trial.Methods and ResultsThe KH-ePVS and Duarte-ePV were calculated on admission. We assessed associations with in-hospital worsening HF, 30-day composite cardiovascular mortality or HF rehospitalization and 180-day all-cause mortality. There were 6373 (89.2%), and 6354 (89.0%) patients who had necessary characteristics to calculate KH-ePVS and Duarte-ePV, respectively. There was no association between PV by either formula with in-hospital worsening HF. KH-ePVS showed a weak correlation with N-terminal prohormone BNP, and with measures of decongestion such as body weight change and urine output (r < 0.3 for all). Duarte-ePV was trending toward an association with worse 30-day (adjusted odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00–1.15, P = .058), but not 180-day outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio 1.03, 95% CI 0.97–1.09, P = .289). A continuous KH-ePVS of >0 (per 10-unit increase) was associated with improved 30-day outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.62–0.91, P = .004). The continuous KH-ePVS was not associated with 180-day outcomes (adjusted hazard ratio 1.05, 95% CI 0.98–1.12, P = .139).ConclusionsBaseline PV estimates had a weak association with in-hospital measures of decongestion. The Duarte-ePV trended toward an association with early clinical outcomes in decompensated HF, and may improve risk stratification in HF.     

Resultados intrahospitalarios tras tratamiento percutáneo frente a quirúrgico en pacientes con estenosis aórtica y enfermedad arterial coronaria concomitante

Introduction and objectivesConcomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is prevalent among aortic stenosis patients; however the optimal therapeutic strategy remains debated. We investigated periprocedural outcomes among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with percutaneous coronary intervention (TAVI/PCI) vs surgical aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass grafting (SAVR/CABG) for aortic stenosis with CAD.MethodsUsing discharge data from the Spanish National Health System, we identified 6194 patients (5217 SAVR/CABG and 977 TAVI/PCI) between 2016 and 2019. Propensity score matching was adjusted for baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital complications and 30-day cardiovascular readmission.ResultsMatching resulted in 774 pairs. In-hospital all-cause mortality was more common in the SAVR/CABG group (3.4% vs 9.4%, P < .001) as was periprocedural stroke (0.9% vs 2.2%; P = .004), acute kidney injury (4.3% vs 16.0%, P < .001), blood transfusion (9.6% vs 21.1%, P < .001), and hospital-acquired pneumonia (0.1% vs 1.7%, P = .001). Permanent pacemaker implantation was higher for matched TAVI/PCI (12.0% vs 5.7%, P < .001). Lower volume centers (< 130 procedures/y) had higher in-hospital all-cause mortality for both procedures: TAVI/PCI (3.6% vs 2.9%, P < .001) and SAVR/CABG (8.3 vs 6.8%, P < .001). Thirty-day cardiovascular readmission did not differ between groups.ConclusionsIn this large contemporary nationwide study, percutaneous management of aortic stenosis and CAD with TAVI/PCI had lower in-hospital mortality and morbidity than surgical intervention. Higher volume centers had less in-hospital mortality in both groups. Dedicated national high-volume heart centers warrant further investigation.     

Emergency Department Visits Versus Hospital Readmissions Among Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure

BackgroundWorsening heart failure (HF) often requires hospitalization but in some cases may be managed in the outpatient or emergency department (ED) settings. The predictors and clinical significance of ED visits without admission vs hospitalization are unclear.MethodsThe ASCEND-HF trial included 2661 US patients hospitalized for HF with reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with a subsequent all-cause ED visit (with ED discharge) within 30 days vs all-cause readmission within 30 days. Factors associated with each type of care were assessed in multivariable models. Multivariable models landmarked at 30 days evaluated associations between each type of care and subsequent 150-day mortality.ResultsThrough 30-day follow-up, 193 patients (7%) had ED discharge, 459 (17%) had readmission, and 2009 (76%) had neither urgent visit. Patients with ED discharge vs readmission were similar with respect to age, sex, systolic blood pressure, ejection fraction, and coronary artery disease, whereas ED discharge patients had a modestly lower creatinine (P < .01). Among patients with either event within 30 days, a higher creatinine and prior HF hospitalization were associated with a higher likelihood of readmission, as compared with ED discharge (P < .02). Landmarked at 30 days, rates of death during the subsequent 150 days were 21.0% for patients who were readmitted and 11.4% for patients discharged from the ED. Compared with patients who were readmitted, ED discharge was independently associated with lower 150-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.36–0.92, P = .02).ConclusionsIn this cohort of US patients hospitalized for HF, worse renal function and prior HF hospitalization were associated with a higher likelihood of early postdischarge readmission, as compared with ED discharge. Although subsequent mortality was high after discharge from the ED, this risk of mortality was significantly lower than patients who were readmitted to the hospital.     

Readmission and Mortality After Hospitalization for Myocardial Infarction and Heart Failure

BackgroundReadmission rates after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations have decreased in the United States since the implementation of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program.ObjectivesThis study was designed to examine the temporal trends of readmission and mortality after AMI and HF in Ontario, Canada, where reducing hospital readmissions has not had a policy incentive.MethodsThe cohort was comprised of AMI or HF patients 65 years of age or older who had been hospitalized from 2006 to 2017. Primary outcomes were 30-day readmission and post-discharge mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality from admission, and in-hospital mortality or 30-day mortality post-discharge. Adjusted monthly trends for each outcome were examined over the study period.ResultsOur cohorts included 152,808 AMI and 223,283 HF patients. Age- and sex-standardized AMI hospitalization rates in Ontario declined 32% from 2006 to 2017 while HF hospitalization rates declined slightly (9.1%). For AMI, risk-adjusted 30-day readmission rates declined from 17.4% in 2006 to 14.7% in 2017. All AMI risk-adjusted mortality rates also declined from 2006 to 2017 with 30-day post-discharge mortality from 5.1% to 4.4%. For HF, overall risk-adjusted 30-day readmission was largely unchanged from 2006 to 2014 at 21.9%, followed by a decline to 20.8% in 2017. Risk-adjusted 30-day post-discharge mortality declined from 7.1% in 2006 to 6.6% in 2017.ConclusionsThe patterns of outcomes in Ontario are consistent with the United States for AMI, but diverge for HF. For AMI and HF, admissions, readmissions, and mortality rates declined over this period. The reasons for the country-specific patterns for HF need further exploration.     

Comparison of scoring systems used in acute pancreatitis for predicting major adverse events

ObjectivesTimely identification of patients with acute pancreatitis who are likely to have a severe disease course is critical. Based on that, many scoring systems have been developed throughout the years. Although many of them are currently in use, none of them has been proven to be ideal. In this study, we aimed to compare the discriminatory power of relatively newer risk scores with the historical ones for predicting in-hospital major adverse events, 30-day mortality and 30-day readmission rate.Patients and methodsPatients who had been admitted due to acute pancreatitis were retrospectively investigated. Five risk scoring systems including HAPS, Ranson, BISAP, Glasgow, and JSS were calculated using the data of the first 24 h of admission. Predictive accuracy of each scoring system was calculated using the area under the receiver-operating curve method.ResultsOverall 690 patients were included in the study. In-hospital major adverse events were observed in 139 (20.1%) patients of whom, 19 (2.5%) died during hospitalization. 30-day all-cause mortality and 30-day readmission were observed in 22 (3.2%) and 27 (3.9%) patients respectively. Negative predictive value of each score was markedly higher compared to positive predictive values. Among all, JSS scoring system showed the highest AUC values across all end-points (0.80 for in-hospital major adverse events; 0.94 for in-hospital mortality; 0.91 for 30-day mortality). However, all five scoring systems failed to predict 30-day readmission.DiscussionJSS was the best classifier among all five risk scoring systems particularly owing to its high sensitivity and negative predictive value.     

Right Heart Catheterization Timing and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock: Analysis from the National Readmission Database

Recent studies showed significant mortality benefit with right heart catheterization (RHC) use in cardiogenic (CS). The optimal timing of RHC in those patients is unknown owing to the lack of available data. The Nationwide Readmission Database 2016-2018 was queried for hospitalizations with CS. We excluded patients presented with cardiac arrest or with a history of ventricular assist devices or heart transplantation. Complex samples multivariable logistic, cox, and linear regression models were used to determine the association between RHC timing in the index admission (<2 days [early RHC] vs ≥ 2 days [late RHC]) and in-hospital outcomes (mortality, acute kidney injury [AKI], mechanical circulatory device use [MCD], index length of stay [LOS], hospital charges), and all-cause 30-day readmissions. A total of 46,963 hospitalizations [18,632 in the early group and 28,332 in the late group] were included in this analysis. RHC was more likely to happen in large teaching hospitals. Although there was no difference in mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.05; Confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.14; P= 0.233). Patients in the early RHC group had a lower incidence of AKI (aOR: 0.69; CI: 0.64-0.74; P < 0.01), higher rate of MCS use (aOR:1.67; CI:1.54-1.81; P < 0.001), shorter LOS (aβ :-6.2; CI -6.62 to -5.77; P <.001), lower hospital charges, and lower readmission rates (adjusted hazards ratio [aHR]: 0.91; CI: 0.84- 0.98; P = 0.01) compared to the late RHC group. Early RHC was associated with decreased incidence of AKI, decreased LOS, total charges, and readmission rates with no difference in survival. Subgroup analysis of patients who did not receive MCS during the index admission showed similar outcomes albeit with increased mortality. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to validate these results.     

Association Between Beta-Blockers and Mortality and Readmission in Older Patients with Heart Failure: an Instrumental Variable Analysis

BackgroundThe demographics of heart failure are changing. The rate of growth of the “older” heart failure population, specifically those ≥ 75, has outpaced that of any other age group. These older patients were underrepresented in the early beta-blocker trials. There are several reasons, including a decreased potential for mortality benefit and increased risk of side effects, why the risk/benefit tradeoff may be different in this population.ObjectiveWe aimed to determine the association between receipt of a beta-blocker after heart failure discharge and early mortality and readmission rates among patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), specifically patients aged 75+.Design and ParticipantsWe used 100% Medicare Parts A and B and a random 40% sample of Part D to create a cohort of beneficiaries with ≥ 1 hospitalization for HFrEF between 2008 and 2016 to run an instrumental variable analysis.Main MeasureThe primary measure was 90-day, all-cause mortality; the secondary measure was 90-day, all-cause readmission.Key ResultsUsing the two-stage least squared methodology, among all HFrEF patients, receipt of a beta-blocker within 30-day of discharge was associated with a − 4.35% (95% CI − 6.27 to − 2.42%, p < 0.001) decrease in 90-day mortality and a − 4.66% (95% CI − 7.40 to − 1.91%, p = 0.001) decrease in 90-day readmission rates. Even among patients ≥ 75 years old, receipt of a beta-blocker at discharge was also associated with a significant decrease in 90-day mortality, − 4.78% (95% CI − 7.19 to − 2.40%, p < 0.001) and 90-day readmissions, − 4.67% (95% CI − 7.89 to − 1.45%, p < 0.001).ConclusionPatients aged ≥ 75 years who receive a beta-blocker after HFrEF hospitalization have significantly lower 90-day mortality and readmission rates. The magnitude of benefit does not appear to wane with age. Absent a strong contraindication, all patients with HFrEF should attempt beta-blocker therapy at/after hospital discharge, regardless of age.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-06901-7KEY WORDS: heart failure, beta-blockers, geriatrics, cardiology, instrumental variable analysis     

Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Trends and Outcomes 2010-2019

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) optimize percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by characterizing lesion morphology, accurately measuring vessel dimensions, and optimizing stent characteristics. We sought to compare the utilization of OCT and IVUS to guide inpatient PCI and their relative association with in-hospital mortality and readmission rates. We queried the National Readmission Database to identify patients undergoing intracoronary imaging-guided PCI from 2010 to 2019 and compared outcomes and readmission rates between patients undergoing OCT-guided PCI and IVUS-guided PCI. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to generate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of adverse outcomes between the 2 groups. Of 3,71,450 intracoronary imaging-guided PCI admissions, OCT (n = 12,808) was used less frequently than IVUS (n = 358,642). The use of OCT-guided PCI increased from 0.1% in 2010 to 0.6% in 2019 while the rate of IVUS-guided PCI increased from 7.2% in 2010 to 9.4% in 2019 (both ptrend <0.001). Patients undergoing OCT compared to IVUS had lower in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.69, P = 0.015) and 30-day readmission rate (aOR 0.91, P = 0.040) with no statistical difference in 90-day readmission rate (aOR 0.93, P = 0.065). Heart failure was the most common cause of 30-day and 90-day readmissions in both cohorts. There was no difference in the rate of acute kidney injury between the 2 modalities. In this in-patient admission database of intracoronary imaging-guided PCI, OCT-guided PCI during index hospitalization appears to be associated with lower in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission rates compared to IVUS-guided PCI with no difference in terms of the 90-day readmission rates.     

Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction During Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the United States

BackgroundType 2 myocardial infarction (MI) is increasingly diagnosed in patients with heart failure (HF). A paucity of data exists pertinent to the contemporary prevalence and impact of type 2 MI in patients with HF. We studied the patient profiles and the prognostic impact of type 2 MI on outcomes of HF hospitalizations.MethodsThe Nationwide Readmission Database 2018 was queried for patients with HF hospitalizations with and without type 2 MI. Baseline characteristics, inpatient outcomes, and 30-day all-cause readmissions between both cohorts were compared.ResultsOf 1,072,674 primary HF hospitalizations included in the study, 28,813 (2.7%) had type 2 MI. Patients with type 2 MI were more likely to be males (56.5% vs 51.6%; P < .001) and had a higher prevalence of hypertension (94% vs 92.2%; P < .001), prior myocardial infarction (17.1% vs 14.9%; P < .001), anemia (9.1% vs 8.1%; P < .001), chronic kidney disease (55.7% vs 49.4%; P < .001), neurological disorders (9.4% vs 7.3%; P < .001), and weight loss (7.3% vs 5.6%; P < .001). Compared with their counterparts without type 2 MI, patients with HF with type 2 MI had significantly higher in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-1.72), hospital costs (adjusted parameter estimate, $1785; 95% CI, 1388-2182), discharge to nursing facility (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.15-1.29), longer length of stay (adjusted parameter estimate, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42-0.64), and rate of 30-day all-cause readmissions (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12).ConclusionType 2 MI in patients hospitalized with HF is associated with higher mortality and resource utilization in the United States.     

Digoxin Reduces 30-day All-cause Hospital Admission in Older Patients with Chronic Systolic Heart Failure

Background

Heart failure is a leading cause of hospital admission and readmission in older adults. The new United States healthcare reform law has created provisions for financial penalties for hospitals with higher than expected 30-day all-cause readmission rates for hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with heart failure. We examined the effect of digoxin on 30-day all-cause hospital admission in older patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.

Methods

In the main Digitalis Investigation Group trial, 6800 ambulatory patients with chronic heart failure (ejection fraction ≤45%) were randomly assigned to digoxin or placebo. Of these, 3405 were aged ≥65 years (mean age, 72 years; 25% were women; 11% were nonwhite). The main outcome in the current analysis was 30-day all-cause hospital admission.

Results

In the first 30 days after randomization, all-cause hospitalization occurred in 5.4% (92/1693) and 8.1% (139/1712) of patients in the digoxin and placebo groups, respectively, (hazard ratio {HR} when digoxin was compared with placebo, 0.66; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.51-0.86; P = .002). Digoxin also reduced both 30-day cardiovascular (3.5% vs 6.5%; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.38-0.72; P < .001) and heart failure (1.7 vs 4.2%; HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.26-0.62; P < .001) hospitalizations, with similar trends for 30-day all-cause mortality (0.7% vs 1.3%; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.27-1.11; P = .096). Younger patients were at lower risk of events but obtained similar benefits from digoxin.

Conclusions

Digoxin reduces 30-day all-cause hospital admission in ambulatory older patients with chronic systolic heart failure. Future studies need to examine its effect on 30-day all-cause hospital readmission in hospitalized patients with acute heart failure.     

Geographical Differences in Comorbidity Burden and Outcomes in Adults With Syncope Hospitalizations in Canada

A recent study found that rates of hospitalization for syncope vary across provinces; however, it is unknown whether differences in comorbidity burden and outcomes also exist. The Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstract Database was used to identify primary syncope hospitalizations (ICD-10 code R55) from 2004 to 2013 for all provinces (except Quebec). Charlson comorbidity score was calculated from comorbidities at the time of hospitalization. Outcomes were defined as in-hospital mortality, 30-day readmission for any cause, and syncope. Logistic regression models were constructed for odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to estimate interprovincial differences in outcomes. The interprovincial range (IPR) for mean age was 61.1 ± 17.5 to 73.7 ± 16.3 years, and at least half were male patients. There were significant differences in comorbidity burden across provinces (P < 0.01); however, the majority of patients had a Charlson comorbidity score = 0 (IPR, 53.9%- 71.9%). In multivariable analysis, compared with Ontario, in-hospital mortality was higher for British Columbia (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.22-2.06), Nova Scotia (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.05-2.65), and Newfoundland (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.29-4.00); 30-day readmission for any cause was higher for British Columbia (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26), Alberta (OR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.07-1.31), Manitoba (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.18-1.56), and Prince Edward Island (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.0-1.89), and all outcomes were higher in Saskatchewan. There is significant interprovincial heterogeneity in comorbidity burden and outcomes for hospitalizations for syncope. Future research evaluating whether standardized practices for management of syncope reduce variability and improve healthcare utilization and costs is needed.     

Surgical rheumatic mitral valve repair compared with percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty in mitral stenosis in current era: a propensity score matching study

BackgroundMany comparative studies of percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty (PBMV) and surgical mitral commissurotomy (SMC) in rheumatic mitral stenosis (MS) were done in the last few decades. With the development of valve repair techniques, various surgical rheumatic valve repair techniques have been applied in clinic, but there is a lack of comparison with PBMV. Our study was designed to compare the perioperative and mid-term outcomes of PBMV and mitral valve repair with “four-step” procedure in the treatment of rheumatic MS.MethodsPatients with MS were treated with PBMV or rheumatic mitral valve repair (rMVP) at Beijing Anzhen Hospital between January 1, 2013 and September 30, 2018 were selected. By using propensity score matching (PSM) method, we compared the changes in post-operation clinical outcomes between the two matched groups. Kaplan-Meier analyses was used for survival analysis and drawing the curve, and log-rank test were used to compare intergroup differences.ResultsA total of 252 cases were enrolled after selection, 74 cases in PBMV and 178 cases in rMVP. Seventy-four pairs were matched successfully after PSM. There were 53 females in PBMV and 54 in rMVP. The mean age of two groups was 46.95±12.50 and 47.55±11.91 years respectively. There was no significantly differences in mitral valve orifice area (MVOA) (1.05±0.32 vs. 0.97±0.24 cm², P=0.12) and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) (62.36%±5.17% vs. 62.52%±4.94%, P=0.76) between two groups preoperatively. Baseline characteristics were basically balanced after PSM. In each group, there was one case transferred to surgical mitral valve replacement due to the failure of valvuloplasty before discharge. All patients survived the interventions and no severe complications were found. MVOA were significantly increased in rMVP compared with PBMV postoperatively, as well as grading of MS and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) were significantly improved in rMVP. Three cases in PBMV were lost during the follow-up. Mitral replacement was performed in 11 patients and one of them died in PBMV, while none of patients underwent re-intervention in rMVP, but one patient died of pneumonia.ConclusionsFor selected patients with rheumatic MS in China, our study shows that there are comparable clinical outcomes in terms of operative, mid-term mortality and complications between PBMV and surgical rMVP with “four-step” procedure. Surgical rMVP shows more advantageous in the correction of valve stenosis and the management of concomitant tricuspid valve lesions and atrial fibrillation (AF).     

Quality of Life Assessment for Acute Heart Failure Patients From Emergency Department Presentation Through 30 Days After Discharge: A Pilot Study With the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire

BackgroundThere are no well validated patient-reported disease status instruments for acute heart failure (HF). We assessed the feasibility of using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) during acute heart failure hospitalization, and the association of acute changes with 30-day readmission.Methods and ResultsA convenience sample of acute HF patients were administered the KCCQ on presentation, discharge, and 30 days after discharge. We examined mean differences in KCCQ scores over time, and we stratified by readmission status to examine differences in hospital-based changes with the use of t test and logistic regression. Among 52 patients (mean age 63 ± 35 years, 56.9% male, 46.2% white), discharge and 30-day assessments were each completed by 90%. Scores were lowest at presentation, improved during hospitalization, and were highest at 30 days. The mean change was +11.9 ± 97.0 (P = .007) between presentation and discharge and +19.8 ± 87.8 (P < .001) between discharge and 30 days. Within the 30-day follow-up, 10 patients were readmitted, and there were no significant differences in score changes during hospitalization between patients with and without readmission (readmitted patients: +4.8 ± 81.5 vs no readmission +16.2 ± 27.4; P = .32).ConclusionsIn this pilot study, the KCCQ is feasible to use during acute HF hospitalizations and demonstrates sensitivity to acute changes, but score changes during hospitalization did not predict 30-day readmission.