Reliability of visual inspection and palpation to assess relative flexibility of the shoulder

IntroductionMovement compensations during internal rotation of the shoulder can provoke pain. Reliably observing and measuring compensations in the shoulder using visual and palpatory methods can result in more efficacious treatments of shoulder pathology. Despite this, the reliability of these measures and the relationship between them is unknown.MethodsBilateral shoulders of 33 Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students were measured. Two third-year DPT student examiners used visual inspection and physical palpation to identify the first signs of internal rotation (IR) passive stiffness. Measurements were taken and recorded by a third examiner using the GetMyROM (Version 1.1) iPhone application.ResultsGood intra-rater reliability for both examiners was identified for physical palpation (ICC = 0.896, 95% CI = 0.830, 0.936, ICC = 0.901, 95% CI = 0.839, 0.939) and visual inspection (ICC = 0.813, 95% CI = 0.699, 0.884, ICC = 0.782, 95% CI = 0.667, 0.880). Moderate interrater reliability was found between the examiners for physical palpation (ICC = 0.681, 95% CI = 0.479, 0.797) while poor interrater reliability was found between examiners for visual inspection (ICC = 0.481, 95% CI = 0.234, 0.648). The correlation between physical palpation and visual inspection indicated moderate reliability for both examiners (r = 0.815, p = 0.01, r = 0.832, p = 0.01).ConclusionThe findings of this research study indicate that both physical palpation and visual inspection are reliable methods for measuring relative flexibility of shoulder IR when performed by the same examiner. However, the reliability for both methods decreases when performed by different examiners. Additionally, a strong correlation was found between both measures.     

Craniocervical Posture Assessed With Photogrammetry and the Accuracy of Palpation Methods for Locating the Seventh Cervical Spinous Process: A Cross-sectional Study

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare craniocervical posture assessed by photogrammetry using 2 distinct palpation methods for locating the spinous process of the seventh cervical vertebra (C7SP).MethodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted in 2 phases. In phase I (n = 42), the assessor's accuracy in locating the C7SP using the flexion-extension and the modified thorax-rib static methods was compared to radiography. In phase II (n = 68), the craniocervical posture was analyzed with photogrammetry after palpation using the 2 methods. Neck pain intensity and disability were also determined.ResultsThe accuracy in locating the C7SP was higher using the modified thorax-rib static method (67%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 55-79) compared to the flexion-extension method (38%, 95% CI, 26-50, P = .016). Lower values of the craniocervical angle were obtained with the flexion-extension method than the modified thorax-rib static method (mean difference = ?1.1°, 95% CI, ?1.6 to ?0.6, P < .001). However, both palpation methods resulted in similar classifications of participants as with or without forward head posture (P = .096). Weak correlations were observed between the craniocervical angle and neck pain intensity (ρ = ?0.088 and ?0.099, respectively) and disability (ρ = ?0.231 and ?0.249, respectively).ConclusionCraniocervical angles obtained using palpation methods with different accuracies were different, although the magnitude of the difference was insufficient to lead to different classifications of a forward head posture in adults with mild neck pain and disability. Craniocervical posture was weakly correlated with neck-pain intensity and disability.     

Intraexaminer and Interexaminer Reliability of Manual Palpation and Pressure Algometry of the Lower Limb Nerves in Asymptomatic Subjects

Objective

Nerve palpation is a method of clinically identifying mechanosensitivity of neural tissue by means of pressure algometry and manual palpation. There are few investigations of the reliability of lower limb nerve palpation, and femoral nerve palpation has never been previously reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of nerve palpation of the femoral, sciatic, tibial, and common peroneal nerves and to report normative values for the femoral nerve.

Methods

The 4 lower limb nerves were palpated in 39 healthy volunteers using pressure algometry and manual digital palpation. Measurements were taken twice by 1 rater (intrarater reliability) and once by a second rater (interrater reliability).

Results

Intraclass correlation coefficients for pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) via pressure algometry of the femoral, common peroneal, tibial, and sciatic nerves were 0.69, 0.84, 0.64, and 0.9 for intrarater reliability, respectively, and 0.82, 0.7, 0.56, and 0.75 for interrater reliability. κ Values for manual palpation were 0.59, 0.55, 0.42, and 0.60 for intrarater reliability and 0.30, 0.49, 0.37, and 0.60 for interrater reliability. Males demonstrated significantly higher PPTs than females for the femoral, sciatic, and tibial nerves, and differences in PPTs were present between right and left sides.

Conclusion

Nerve palpation of the femoral, common peroneal, and sciatic nerves using pressure algometry demonstrated good to excellent reliability, whereas the tibial nerve PPTs showed moderate to good reliability. Manual palpation measurements demonstrated fair to moderate reliability.     

Accuracy of Palpation Procedures for Locating the C1 Transverse Process and Masseter Muscle as Confirmed by Computed Tomography Images

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to examine the accuracy of palpation methods for locating the transverse processes of the first cervical vertebra and masseter muscle using radiographic images as the gold-standard method and the association between personal characteristics with the observed accuracy.MethodsThis was a single-blinded, diagnostic accuracy study. Ninety-five participants (49 women, 58 ± 16 years of age) were enrolled in this study. A single examiner palpated the neck and face region of all participants to identify the transverse processes of the first cervical vertebra and masseter muscles bilaterally. In sequence, participants underwent a multislice computed tomography scan for assessment of the superimposed inner body structure. Two radiologists assessed the computed tomography images using the same criteria and were blinded regarding each other's assessment and the anatomic landmarks under investigation. The palpation accuracy was calculated as the proportion of the correctly identified landmarks in the studied sample. The correlation of the palpation outcome (correct = 1; incorrect = 0) with age, sex (male = 1; female = 0), and body mass index was investigated using the point-biserial correlation coefficient.ResultsThe right and left transverse processes were correctly located in 76 (80%) and 81 (85%) participants, respectively, and bilaterally in 157 events (83%), as evaluated by the consensus of the 2 radiologists. The masseter muscles were correctly localized bilaterally in 95 of 95 (100%) participants. Body mass showed statistical evidence of a weak, positive correlation with the correct location of the transverse processes of the first cervical vertebra at the right body side (r = .219; 95% confidence interval, 0.018-0.403; P = .033).ConclusionPalpation methods used in this study accurately identified the location of the first cervical vertebra spinous processes and the masseter muscles.     

Intrarater and interrater reliability of the modified Thomas Test

IntroductionThe modified Thomas Test (MTT) is a method of assessing flexibility of the iliopsoas, rectus femoris and tensor fascia Latae. The aim of this study is to identify the intra and inter-rater reliability of the pass/fail scoring for the Modified Thomas Test (MTT) using digital photographs.MethodsSix raters varying between 1 and 13years of clinical experience were used to review digital photographs of 20 semi-professional rugby players performing the /MTT. Raters were asked to score each muscle of the MTT either with 0 (fail) or 1 (pass). Digital photographs were allocated in a randomized order. Each rater reviewed each photograph three times at two week intervals.ResultsCronbach's alpha (Cα) revealed a mean result of high reliability for both iliopsoas (Cα = 0.95) and rectus femoris (Cα = 1.00) flexibility. TFL flexibility values ranged from 0.64 to 0.95, demonstrating some inconsistencies within some of the 6 raters. Fleiss kappa (Fк) revealed a high mean reliability result across the 3 testing sessions for both iliopsoas (Fк = 0.78) and rectus femoris (Fк = 0.80) flexibility, along with a moderate reliability mean result for TFL (Fк = 0.56).ConclusionHigh intra and inter rater reliability was found for iliopsoas and rectus femoris flexibility with those for TFL found to be moderately reliable.     

Locating the Seventh Cervical Spinous Process: Development and Validation of a Multivariate Model Using Palpation and Personal Information

Objective

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a multivariate prediction model, guided by palpation and personal information, for locating the seventh cervical spinous process (C7SP).

B-Mode Ultrasonography Is a Reliable and Valid Alternative to Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Measuring Patellar Tendon Cross-Sectional Area

This study investigated the validity and reliability of measuring patellar tendon (PT) cross-sectional area (CSA) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) imaging. Nineteen healthy participants (10 women, 9 men) participated in three imaging sessions of the PT, once via MRI and twice via US, with image acquisition conducted by two raters, one experienced (rater 2) and one inexperienced (rater 1). All PT segmentations were analyzed by both raters. The validity of US-derived estimates of PT CSA against MRI estimates was analyzed using linear regression. Within-day reliability of US and MRI measurements and between-day reliability of US measurements were quantified using typical error (TE) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC_3,1). There was good agreement between US- and MRI-derived estimations of PT CSA (standard errors of the estimate of 3.3 mm² for rater 1 and 2.6 mm² for rater 2; Pearson's r = 0.97 and 0.98 for raters 1 and 2, respectively). Within-session reliability for estimations of total PT CSA from US and MRI were excellent (ICC_3,1 >0.95, coefficient of variation [CV] <4.1%, TE = 1.3–3.6 mm². Between-day reliability for US was excellent (ICC_3,1 >0.97, CV <2.7%, TE = 1.6–2.3 mm²), with little difference between raters. These findings suggest that MRI and US both provide reliable estimates of PT CSA and that US can provide a valid measure of PT CSA.     

Spinal Motion Palpation: A Review of Reliability Studies

Abstract

Spinal motion palpation is a diagnostic tool used by a number of professions. Research studies available on the reliability of motion palpation studies have statistical and methodological flaws affecting their statistical conclusion validity, external validity, and construct validity. Further research is necessary to determine the reliability of motion palpation techniques bearing in mind these statistical and methodological flaws.     

Assessment of bimanual performance in 3-D movement analysis: Validation of a new clinical protocol in children with unilateral cerebral palsy

BackgroundThe “Be an Airplane Pilot” (BE-API) protocol is a novel 3-D movement analysis (3DMA) protocol assessing the bimanual performance of children during a game.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the reliability and validity of this protocol in children with unilateral cerebral palsy (uCP).MethodsAngular waveforms (WAVE), maximum angles (MAX) and range of motion (ROM) of the trunk, shoulder, elbow and wrist joints were collected in children with uCP and in typically developing children (TDC) during 4 tasks of the BE-API protocol designed to explore specific degrees of freedom (DoF). The inter-trial reliability for children with uCP was assessed with the coefficient of multiple correlation (CMC) for WAVE and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and standard error of measurement (SEM) for MAX and ROM. Clinical performance-based measures, including the Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA) and ABILHAND-Kids scores, were used to explore correlations between clinical measures and kinematic parameters in children with uCP.Results20 children with uCP (13 boys; mean age 12.0 [SD 3.2] years) and 20 TDC (11 boys; mean age 11.9 [SD 3.4] years) were included. In children with uCP, most kinematic parameters showed high reliability (WAVE: CMC ≥ 0.82; MAX and ROM: ICC ≥ 0.85, SEM ≤ 4.7°). Elbow extension, forearm supination, and wrist adduction were reduced and wrist flexion was increased for children with uCP versus TDC (P < 0.01). In children with uCP, MAX and ROM values were moderately correlated with clinical assessments (AHA score: r = 0.48–0.65; ABILHAND-Kids score: r = 0.48–0.49).ConclusionsThe BE-API protocol is a 3DMA-bimanual performance-based assessment that is highly reliable in children with uCP. Children with uCP and TDC significantly differed in some clinically relevant kinematic parameters. The BE-API is a promising playful tool, helpful for better understanding upper-limb motor movement abnormalities in bimanual conditions and for tailoring treatments to individual deficits.     

Development of an oral assessment tool to evaluate appetite in patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy

PurposeThe objective of this study was to develop an oral assessment tool for evaluating the appetite of patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy, who had dysgeusia, xerostomia, and oral mucositis, as well as to verify its validity and reliability.Methods and sampleA draft oral assessment tool, which included a 5-point scale and 19 items, was prepared based on an interview survey of 30 patients. The resultant questionnaire survey was provided to 209 subjects.ResultsOn the basis of factor analysis of construct validity, 3 factors (dysgeusia and loss of favors), (salivation abnormality and loss of moisture in the oral cavity), and (pain in the oral cavity and lack of motivation) comprising 14 items were adopted for the final survey. During a review of criteria validity, a correlation was found between the scores of the three factors and overall oral assessment tool, and the scores of taste sensitivity, xerostomia, oral mucositis, and appetite with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.41–0.89 (p < 0.01). With regard to reliability, stability was determined as 0.87 (p < 0.01) according to test–retest study results. Internal consistency was confirmed by a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.83 (p < 0.01) and an interclass correlation coefficient of 0.80 (p < 0.01).ConclusionsOn the basis of the validity and reliability of the oral assessment tool developed, it has been found to be practical for use in the assessment of appetite of patients with head and neck cancer.     

Accuracy of rib palpation for dry needling of deep periscapular musculature,measured with ultrasound

IntroductionDry needling of the periscapular musculature is a procedure commonly performed by physical therapists. Needling of the deep musculature may be challenging, and use of a thoracic rib as a “backstop” is often applied to prevent inadvertent puncture of the pleura. The aim of this study was to: 1) To examine the accuracy rate of experienced physical therapists in identifying a mid-scapular thoracic rib using palpation, 2) to understand patient characteristics that affect the accuracy rate, and 3) to examine if therapist confidence levels were associated with palpatory accuracy.MethodsTwo experienced physical therapists attempted to palpate a thoracic rib in the mid-scapular region of healthy participants (n = 101 subjects, 202 ribs), and self-reported their level of confidence in an accurate palpation. Their accuracy was verified with ultrasonography.ResultsThe two physical therapists were accurate on 73.3% of palpations and did not differ in accuracy (72.0% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.747). The only ultrasonographic or subject characteristic measurement that correlated with improved accuracy was a reduced muscle thickness (p = 0.032). Therapists’ self-reported confidence levels did not correlate to actual accuracy (p = 0.153).DiscussionPhysical therapists should be aware that palpation of a thoracic rib may not be as accurate as it may seem. The greater thickness of muscle in the area reduces the accuracy of accurate palpation.ConclusionDry needling of the periscapular muscles should be done with caution if using a rib as a “blocking” technique.     

Standardized simulated palpation training – Development of a Palpation Trainer and assessment of palpatory skills in experienced and inexperienced clinicians

Specific palpation skills are required to identify and treat myofascial pain. The aim of this study was to develop a device that reflects absolute pressure values during simulated palpation, and to test the hypothesis that training through standardized manual palpation results in improved skills for experienced and inexperienced examiners. Experienced (n = 30) and inexperienced (n = 30) examiners were randomly divided into either training or control. A device (Palpation Trainer) was constructed to measure pressure intensity (P_peak) and rate of pressure development (RPD). Training consisted of 8–10 min standardized simulated palpation, during which examiners followed a standardized pressure–time curve (visualized in real-time on a pc-monitor). Controls received no training. Tests were performed at baseline, immediately post training and again after 48 h and analyzed for P_peak and RPD. After simulated palpation training, experienced examiners improved palpatory skills related to P_peak and RPD (i.e. performed closer to predetermined guidelines and with reduced inter-examiner variation), while inexperienced examiners only improved RPD (p < 0.05). Thus, standardized training resulted in acute and temporary (48 h) changes in selected analysis variables during simulated palpation in experienced and to some extent also in inexperienced clinicians. Whether this can be transferred to clinical in vivo setting requires further study.     

Intra- and Interrater Reliability of Remote Assessment of Transfers by Wheelchair Users Using the Transfer Assessment Instrument (Version 4.0)

ObjectiveTo evaluate the reliability, standard error of measurement, minimum detectable change, and item-level consistency of the Transfer Assessment Instrument (TAI) version 4.0 when used to evaluate transfer quality remotely.DesignParticipants transferred from their wheelchair to a mat table (transfer 1), repeated this after a 10-minute delay to assess intrarater reliability (transfer 2), and repeated this 1-2 days later to assess test-retest reliability (transfer 3). Each transfer was scored in person by 4 raters and asynchronously by a remote clinician rater.Setting2017 National Veterans Wheelchair Games.ParticipantsConvenience sample of 44 full-time wheelchair users (N=44).InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresTAI total score, subscores (wheelchair setup, body setup, flight/landing), and item scores (15 items).ResultsModerate to excellent reliability was found when scoring remotely for TAI total and subscores for intrarater (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC(3,1)=0.687-0.854), test-retest (ICC(3,1)=0.695-0.836), and interrater reliability (ICC(3,5)=0.746-0.962). Remote rater total score and flight/landing subscore were greater (indicating higher transfer quality) compared to the average in-person raters (P=.021 and P=.005, respectively). There were no differences between transfers 1-3 in remote rater scores. Item-level percentage agreement between the remote rater and in-person exceeded the 75% cutoff for clinical utility for all items.ConclusionsThe TAI is a reliable outcome measure for assessing transfer technique remotely.     

A simulated passive intervertebral motion task: observations of performance in a cross-sectional study

Abstract

Introduction: Passive motion palpation is an integral component in examination, diagnosis or classification, and treatment of persons with mechanical disorders of the cervical spine. If the magnitude of force application during passive movement assessment is associated with greater palpatory accuracy has not been established.

Methods: This investigation used a novel mechanical model as a basis for assessing the palpatory force of students and clinicians. The model included multiple palpable resistance and displacement levels similar to that observed in humans. The ability of the subjects to discriminate the various levels of resistance and displacement offered by the model was concurrently measured.

Results: Large variability occurred in the amount of force applied by the subjects in completing the palpatory examination. The data indicated no major differences in palpatory accuracy across the student and clinician groups with different training and experience levels beyond basic competency. Those subjects applying less force in the palpatory exam demonstrated greater accuracy of palpatory assessment with one measure.

Discussion: The data indicate training and experience had minimal relationship to palpatory interpretation precision beyond the basic level and individual natural discriminatory ability may be a factor in accuracy of palpatory skill. The results demonstrate remarkable inconsistency in palpatory force among examiners and suggest that palpatory accuracy may be related to less force application.     

A Novel and Accurate Palpation Method for Identification of the L4 Spinous Process: A Preliminary Study of Accuracy

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess a novel method of lumbar spinous process (SP) palpation by using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) high-signal marker reference standards for verification.MethodsClinicians (doctors of chiropractic) in this study used either: (1) the standard/traditional method of identifying the L4 SP using the supracristal plane (n = 14) or (2) a novel method that manually induced sacral motion to identify the L5 and then the L4 SP (n = 54). The clinicians, blinded to the results of each other, used a grease pencil to mark the location identified as the L4 SP. An MRI high-signal marker then was taped across this location. The MRI scans were assessed by a radiologist, blinded to the palpation method, who extended a line posteriorly from the superior and inferior extent of the L4 SP and determined whether the high-signal marker was within the lines bordering the L4 SP (ie, “on-target”).ResultsPalpation using the traditional method showed a 35.7% accuracy, with 5 of 14 “on target” and all “off target” being too superior. Palpation using the novel method showed 77.8% accuracy, with 42 of 54 “on target” and 3 “off target” being too superior and 9 “off target” too inferior.ConclusionsThe novel method performed better than the traditional method. The novel method shows promise. Additional prospective research should be conducted to fully assess the accuracy of the novel method compared with traditional methods of palpation.     

Evaluation of the Reliability and Validity of the Behavioral Indicators of Infant Pain Scale in Chinese Neonates

BackgroundBehavioral Indicators of Infant Pain scale (BIIP) has been shown to be a good tool to assess pain in infants.AimsThis paper aimed to translate BIIP into Chinese and evaluate its reliability and validity for neonates in China.DesignA prospective observational study.Setting and ParticipantsA convenience sample of 396 neonates (preterm and term infants) were recruited from neonatal intensive care units in China from July to October 2016.MethodsThe BIIP was translated and adjusted for semantic adaption.396 neonates were assessed during 3 phases of blood collection from an artery/vein. A video camera was positioned for a close-up view of the face and body. The neonates’ pain was rated independently by 2 nurses who were trained and familiar with the Chinese version of BIIP (C-BIIP)and FLACC (Facial expression, Legs, Activity, Crying and Consolability).ResultsThe internal consistency were 0.904 (preterm) and 0.895 (term). The test-retest reliability were 0.947 (preterm) and 0.938 (term) and the interclass correlation coefficients were 0.921 to 0.959 (preterm) and 0.921 to 0.959 (term). The correlations between the C-BIIP and FLACC were high (preterm: r = 0.948, term: r = 0.896). Using the C-BIIP, the 3 phases of blood collection were found to be statistically different (preterm: F = 635.76, term: F = 675.54; P < 0.001), which showed that the construct validity of C-BIIP was good.ConclusionThe BIIP is a reliable and valid tool to assess pain in term and preterm neonates in China.     

Development and Validation of the ACP-CAT for Assessing the Quality of Advance Care Planning Communication

ContextHigh-quality advance care planning (ACP) discussions are important to ensure patient receipt of goal-concordant care; however, there is no existing tool for assessing ACP communication quality.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to develop and validate a novel instrument that can be used to assess ACP communication skills of clinicians and trainees.MethodsWe developed a 20-item ACP Communication Assessment Tool (ACP-CAT) plus two summative items. Randomized rater pairs assessed residents' performances in video-recorded standardized patient encounters before and after an ACP training program using the ACP-CAT. We tested the tool for its 1) discriminating ability, 2) interrater reliability, 3) concurrent validity, 4) feasibility, and 5) raters' satisfaction.ResultsFifty-eight pre/post-training video recordings from 29 first-year internal medicine residents at Mount Sinai Hospital were evaluated. ACP-CAT reliably discriminated performance before and after training (median score 6 vs. 11, P < 0.001). For both pre/post-training encounters, interrater reliability was high for ACP-CAT total scores (intraclass correlation coefficient or ICC = 0.83 and 0.82) and the summative items Overall impression of ACP communication skills (ICC = 0.73 and 0.80) and Overall ability to respond to emotion (ICC = 0.83 and 0.82). Concurrent validity was shown by the strong correlation between ACP-CAT total score and both summative items. Raters spent an average of 4.8 minutes to complete the ACP-CAT, found it feasible, and were satisfied with its use.ConclusionACP-CAT provides a validated measure of ACP communication quality for assessing video-recorded encounters and can be further studied for its applicability with clinicians in different clinical contexts.     

Reliability of the Modified CKCUEST and correlation with shoulder strength in adolescent basketball and volleyball players

BackgroundPhysical performance tests provide a more complete picture of the functional status of the athlete's upper extremity.ObjectivesThe primary purpose was to evaluate the reliability of the Modified Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (MCKCUEST) in adolescent volleyball and basketball players. The secondary objective was to evaluate the relationship between the MCKCUEST and shoulder rotation isometric strength in this population.MethodsSeventy-three healthy basketball (n = 39) and volleyball (n = 34) players participated to establish the reliability and correlations of the MCKCUEST. We used a two-session measurement design to evaluate the reliability of the MCKCUEST. Shoulder rotation isometric strength was performed to determine relationships with the MCKCUEST.ResultsThe intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC_2,1) for intra-session reliability of the MCKCUEST ranged from 0.86 to 0.89, and the between days test–retest reliability (ICC_3,1) was 0.93. The standard error of measurement (1 touch) and the minimal detectable change (3 touches) showed clinically acceptable absolute reliability values. A weak correlation was found between the MCKCUEST power score and shoulder rotation isometric strength (r values between 0.3 and 0.4).ConclusionsResults demonstrated good to excellent relative reliability and clinically acceptable absolute reliability values for the MCKCUEST on adolescent basketball and volleyball athletes. Performances on the MCKCUEST were weakly associated with shoulder rotation strength.     

The MyotonPRO: A reliable tool for quantifying the viscoelastic properties of a trigger point on the infraspinatus in non-traumatic chronic shoulder pain

IntroductionClinicians rely on palpation for locating and diagnosing trigger points in muscles. Measuring a trigger point with clinical palpation remains a challenge. There are currently no validated tools available in clinical practice to objectively measure a trigger point.MethodThe presence of a trigger point within the infraspinatus muscle was identified on thirty-five individuals with non-traumatic chronic shoulder pain via palpation according to Travell and Simons criteria. Trigger and non-trigger points were marked within the same muscle and the viscoelastic properties of both points were independently measured twice with the MyotonPRO by two evaluators on two days.ResultsSignificant differences were observed when the trigger and non-trigger point (discriminant validity) were compared. The trigger points showed greater tone and stiffness compared to the non-trigger points (tone: 15.30 ± 1.99 Hz vs 13.57 ± 1.76 Hz; stiffness: 270.20 ± 46.96 N/m vs 227.86 ± 43.44 N/m; p < 0.05) and less elasticity (decrement of 1.13 ± 0.21 vs 1.06 ± 0.27; p < 0.05). The reliability of the three viscoelastic properties was found to be excellent for intra- and inter-evaluator reliability (ICC: 0.925–0.984 and 0.918–0.972, respectively) and good to excellent for test-retest reliability (between days) (ICC: 0.770–0.875).ConclusionThe MyotonPRO can differentiate the viscoelastic properties of a trigger point from a non-trigger point. Our findings support the reliability of this myotonometer. This affordable and portable tool can be used to objectively measure viscoelastic properties of trigger points in the infraspinatus.     

Reliability of an Observational Biomechanical Analysis Tool in Adolescent Baseball Pitchers

BackgroundImproper pitching mechanics are a risk factor for arm injuries. While 3-dimensional (3D) motion analysis remains the gold standard for evaluation, most pitchers and clinicians do not have access to this costly technology. Recent advances in 2-dimensional (2D) video technology provide acceptable resolution for clinical analysis. However, no systematic assessment tools for pitching analysis exist.PurposeTo determine the reliability of the Assessment of biomeChanical Efficiency System (ACES) screening tool using 2D video analysis to identify common biomechanical errors in adolescent pitchers.Study DesignCross-sectional.MethodsAdolescent baseball pitchers underwent analysis using 2D video in indoor settings. Observational mechanics were collected using a 20-item scoring tool (ACES) based on 2D video analysis. Fleiss’ kappa, interclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and frequencies were used to examine intra-/interrater reliability based on common pitching errors.ResultsTwenty asymptomatic pitchers ages 12-18 years were included. Total ACES scores ranged from 1 to 13, normally distributed. ACES total score demonstrated excellent intra-rater reliability within each rater (ICC for rater 1 = 0.99 (95% CI; 0.98, 0.99); ICC for rater 2 = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.84, 0.97); ICC for rater 3 = 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 0.99)). There was excellent interrater reliability across the trials and raters (ICC = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.82, 0.96). The ACES tool demonstrated acceptable kappas for individual items and strong ICC 0.91 (95% CI: 0.82, 0.96) for total scores across the trials. Regarding identification of biomechanical errors, “front side position” was rated erroneous in 84/120 ratings (70%), stride length in 52/120 ratings (43.3%) and lead hip position in 53/120 ratings (44.2%).ConclusionsThe 20-item ACES scoring tool with 2D video analysis demonstrated excellent intra- and interrater reliability when utilized by raters of different musculoskeletal disciplines. Future studies validating 2D vs. 3D methodology are warranted before ACES is widely disseminated and utilized for adolescent pitchers. ACES is a practical and reliable clinical assessment tool utilizing 2D video analysis for coaches, instructors, and sports medicine providers to screen adolescent pitchers for common biomechanical errors.Level of Evidence3b