Reflex Responses of Neck,Back, and Limb Muscles to High-Velocity,Low-Amplitude Manual Cervical and Upper Thoracic Spinal Manipulation of Asymptomatic Individuals—A Descriptive Study

ObjectiveThe purpose of this research was to determine the extent of reflex responses after spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) of the cervical and upper thoracic spine.MethodsEleven asymptomatic participants received 6 commonly used SMTs to the cervical and upper thoracic spine. Bipolar surface electromyography electrodes were used to measure reflex responses of 16 neck, back, and proximal limb muscles bilaterally. The percentage of occurrence and the extent of reflex responses of these muscles were determined.ResultsReflex responses after cervical SMT were typically present in all neck and most back muscles, whereas responses in the outlets to the arm and leg were less frequent. This trend was similar, although decreased in magnitude, after thoracic SMT.ConclusionReflex responses were greatest after upper cervical SMT and lowest with thoracic SMT.     

Relationship between neck acceleration and muscle activation in people with chronic neck pain: Implications for functional disability

BackgroundPrevious study has found that people with chronic neck pain moved with a consistently compromised acceleration/deceleration at their cervical and thoracic spines. This study examined the strength of the association between the electromyographic activities and the acceleration/deceleration of the cervical and thoracic spine, and its correlation with the functional disabilities in individuals with neck pain.MethodsTime history of the cervical and thoracic acceleration/deceleration and EMG activity was acquired in thirty-four subjects with chronic neck pain and thirty-four age- and gender-matched asymptomatic subjects during active neck movements. The strength of the association between the electromyographic activity of spinal muscles and the cervical and thoracic acceleration/deceleration was determined using cross-correlation method. Relationship between the strength of this association and the severity of the functional disabilities in neck pain group was examined using correlation analysis.FindingsThe strength of the association between cervical and thoracic acceleration/deceleration and electromyographic activities was significantly lower in neck pain group. Significant negative correlations were found between the functional disability level and the strength of this defined association in the symptomatic group.InterpretationThe compromised capability of the spinal muscles to produce acceleration/deceleration in the neck pain group may imply an impaired electromechanical coupling of these spinal muscles when performing neck movements. Significant negative correlation of the degree of functional disabilities suggests that the present approach can be used as an objective and specific evaluation of the dynamic performance of the spinal muscles and its relationship with the functional disabilities in neck pain subjects.     

Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation in patients with neck pain: a randomized clinical trial

Mechanical neck pain is a common occurrence in the general population resulting in a considerable economic burden. Often physical therapists will incorporate manual therapies directed at the cervical spine including joint mobilization and manipulation into the management of patients with cervical pain. Although the effectiveness of mobilization and manipulation of the cervical spine has been well documented, the small inherent risks associated with these techniques has led clinicians to frequently utilize manipulation directed at the thoracic spine in this patient population. It is hypothesized that thoracic spine manipulation may elicit similar therapeutic benefits as cervical spine manipulation while minimizing the magnitude of risk associated with the cervical technique. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to investigate the immediate effects of thoracic spine manipulation on perceived pain levels in patients presenting with neck pain. The results suggest that thoracic spine manipulation results in immediate analgesic effects in patients with mechanical neck pain. Further studies are needed to determine the effects of thoracic spine manipulation in patients with neck pain on long-term outcomes including function and disability.     

Patient positioning and spinal locking for lumbar spine rotation manipulation

High velocity low amplitude (HVLA) thrust techniques are widely used by many manual therapists to treat low back pain. There is increasing evidence that spinal manipulation produces positive patient outcomes for acute low back pain. HVLA thrust techniques are associated with an audible release in the form of a pop or cracking sound that is widely accepted to represent cavitation of a spinal zygapophyseal joint. This audible release distinguishes these techniques from other manual therapy interventions. When using long lever HVLA thrust techniques spinal locking is necessary to localize forces and achieve cavitation at a specific vertebral segment. A critical factor in applying lumbar spine manipulation with minimal force is patient positioning and spinal locking. A knowledge of coupled movements of the lumbar spine aids an understanding of the patient positioning required to achieve spinal locking consistent with maximal patient comfort and cooperation. Excessive rotation can result in pain, patient resistance and failed technique. This masterclass presents a model of patient positioning for the lumbar spine that minimizes excessive use of rotation to achieve spinal locking prior to the application of the thrust.     

Dry needling for the management of thoracic spine pain

Abstract

Thoracic spine pain is as disabling as neck and low back pain; however, it has not received as much attention as the cervical and lumbar spine in the scientific literature. Among the different structures that can refer pain to the thoracic spine, muscles often play a relevant role. In fact, myofascial trigger points (TrPs) from several neck, shoulder and spinal muscles can induce pain in the region of the thoracic spine. There is a lack of evidence reporting the presence of myofascial TrPs in the thoracic spine, but clinical evidence suggests that TrPs can be a potential source of thoracic spine pain. The current paper discusses the role of myofascial TrPs in the thoracic spine and summarises the proper and safe application of dry needling (DN) for the management of myofascial TrPs in two main spinal muscles involved in thoracic spine pain: the thoracic multifidi and longissimus thoracis. In addition, this paper discusses the application of DN in other tissues such as tendons, ligaments and scars.     

Spinal manipulation: Indications,risks and benefits

High velocity low amplitude (HVLA) thrust techniques are widely used by many manual medicine disciplines to treat spinal dysfunction. Techniques of this type are associated with an audible release in the form of a pop or cracking sound that is widely accepted to represent cavitation of a spinal zygapophyseal joint. This audible release distinguishes HVLA thrust techniques from other manual medicine interventions. Common indications for the use of HVLA thrust techniques are ‘joint fixation’, ‘joint locking’ and somatic dysfunction but various authors have also described other indications for the therapeutic use of these techniques. Despite a wide range of indications, there has been a decline in the use of HVLA thrust techniques. Concern regarding patient safety and the difficulty associated with gaining mastery of HVLA thrust techniques may be reasons for the decline in their use. While there are potential serious sequelae from the use of HVLA thrust techniques, the risks are low provided patients are thoroughly assessed and treated by appropriately trained practitioners. With increasing evidence that spinal manipulation produces positive patient outcomes for acute low back pain and some categories of neck pain and headache, there is a need to look critically at the indications for the use of HVLA thrust techniques as well as the actual risks and potential benefits of this therapeutic modality.     

Regional interdependence and manual therapy directed at the thoracic spine

Abstract

Thoracic spine manipulation is commonly used by physical therapists for the management of patients with upper quarter pain syndromes. The theoretical construct for using thoracic manipulation for upper quarter conditions is a mainstay of a regional interdependence (RI) approach. The RI concept is likely much more complex and is perhaps driven by a neurophysiological response including those related to peripheral, spinal cord and supraspinal mechanisms. Recent evidence suggests that thoracic spine manipulation results in neurophysiological changes, which may lead to improved pain and outcomes in individuals with musculoskeletal disorders. The intent of this narrative review is to describe the research supporting the RI concept and its application to the treatment of individuals with neck and/or shoulder pain. Treatment utilizing both thrust and non-thrust thoracic manipulation has been shown to result in improvements in pain, range of motion and disability in patients with upper quarter conditions. Research has yet to determine optimal dosage, techniques or patient populations to which the RI approach should be applied; however, emerging evidence supporting a neurophysiological effect for thoracic spine manipulation may negate the need to fully answer this question. Certainly, there is a need for further research examining both the clinical efficacy and effectiveness of manual therapy interventions utilized in the RI model as well as the neurophysiological effects resulting from this intervention.     

Evidence-Based Approach to the Physical Therapy Diagnosis and Management of Neck and Upper Extremity Pain using Cervical and Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation: A Case Report

Abstract

Neck and upper extremity pain are common medical diagnoses for patients seeking physical therapy care. The purpose of this case report is to describe an evidence-based approach to the physical therapy diagnosis and management of a 46-year-old female reporting insidious onset neck pain and bilateral upper extremity paraesthesiae of two years duration. Evaluation of examination data, based on research data with regard to diagnostic accuracy of the tests and measures used, indicated a diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. Management was based on a treatment-based classification approach and focused on restoring mobility by way of thrust manipulations directed at the thoracic and cervical spine. At the completion of the physical therapy plan of care (8 visits), the patient rated her perceived improvement on the Global Rating of Change Scale as "a very great deal better." The Numerical Pain Rating Score improved from 6/10 to 0/10. Patient-perceived disability, as measured by the Neck Disability Index, improved from 26% to 0%, and the patient's score on the modified Oswestry Disability Index improved from 30% to 0%. Bilateral upper extremity paraesthesiae also had completely resolved. These clinically meaningful improvements in pain and perceived disability were maintained six weeks after discharge. While a cause-and-effect relationship cannot be inferred from a case report, it is plausible that an orthopaedic manual physical therapy approach in the management of patients with both neck and upper extremity pain may result in decreased pain and improved function. Further clinical trials are needed to test this hypothesis.     

Immediate Effects of a Single Session of Cervical Spine Manipulation on Cervical Movement Patterns in People With Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveThe aim of the present study was to assess the immediate effects of a single session of cervical spine manipulation on cervical movement patterns, disability, and the patient's perceived improvement in people with nonspecific neck pain.MethodsA single-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial was carried out at a biomechanics institute. Fifty participants diagnosed with acute and chronic nonspecific neck pain (minimum duration of the symptoms being 1 month) were randomized to an experimental group (EG, n = 25) or a sham-control group (CG, n = 25, 23 of whom completed the study). EG received a single cervical spine manipulation session; CG received a single placebo intervention. Both groups received manipulation or sham from the same physiotherapist. Main outcome measures were neck kinematics (ie, range of motion and movement harmony) during cyclic movements, self-reported neck disability, and impression of change assessed before and 5 minutes after treatment.ResultsThe EG showed no significant improvements (P > .05) in any of the studied biomechanical variables, except for right-side bending and left rotation, in which we found a range of motion significant mean difference of 1.97° and 1.95°, respectively (P < .05). The CG showed enhanced harmonic motion during flexion (P < .05). Both groups showed a significant decrease in self-reported neck disability after treatment (P < .05), and EG participants perceived a significantly larger improvement after manipulation compared with the CG (P < .05).ConclusionsA single session of cervical manipulation provided by a physiotherapist had no impact on cervical motion during cyclic movements, but rather induced self-reported perceived improvement in neck disability and impression of change after treatment in people with nonspecific neck pain.     

Repeated measures of recent headache, neck and upper back pain in Australian adolescents

The epidemiological and clinical literature identifies strong associations between adult headache, cervical and thoracic spine dysfunction and spinal posture. This paper reports on the prevalence and incidence of headache, neck and upper back pain which occurred in the previous week, in urban Australians aged 13-17 years. Commencing in 1999, we followed a cohort of South Australian students through 5 years of secondary schooling. Of our commencing cohort of students, 132 (30%) provided data on bodily pain every year. For both girls and boys, there was a significantly decreasing prevalence of headache over the study period, while neck pain and upper back pain increased. There was a significantly increasing trend over time for boys with upper back pain. Twenty percent of girls and boys consistently reported headache, neck pain or upper back pain over 5 years. The progression of early adolescent headaches to mid-adolescent neck and upper back pain potentially reflects the adolescents' biomechanical responses to intrinsic and extrinsic imposts. This requires further investigation to understand the causes of adolescent headache, neck and upper thoracic pain.     

Spinal high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation with exercise in women with chronic temporomandibular disorders

Background

Evidence indicates that manual therapy alone or in combination with exercise can be beneficial for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). However, there is still insufficient information demonstrating the effectiveness of treatment directed to the cervical spine for the management of TMD.

Objective

To investigate the effects of spinal high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) manipulation with exercise compared to patient education in patients with chronic TMD. Another objective was to assess the effects of adding spinal HVLA manipulation to exercise.

Patients and methods

Sixty female patients with TMD were randomized to three groups: cervical spinal manipulation plus neck exercise (CSM?+?NE), sham manipulation plus neck exercise (SM?+?NE), and patient education only (PE). Scores on a numeric rating scale (NRS), pressure pain thresholds (PPT), pain-free maximum mouth opening (MMO), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) were evaluated at baseline, posttreatment, and 1?month follow-up after randomization. No further treatment of TMD (like dental correction) was applied during the study period.

Results

In terms of pain, significant differences were observed in the CSM?+?NE group vs. the SM?+?NE and PE groups posttreatment. Although PPT increased significantly in the CSM?+?NE group, no significant changes in any PPT were found in either the SM?+?NE or PE group. Regarding pain-free MMO and SF-36 scores, there were significant increases posttreatment in the CSM?+?NE and SM?+?NE groups compared to the PE group.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that HVLA manipulation of the upper cervical spine with neck exercise can be effective for treatment of pain and dysfunction in patients with chronic TMD, it is not the TMD treatment itself. Therefore, it seems reasonable to add cervical manipulation to the rehabilitation program.

     

Unilateral and Multiple Cavitation Sounds During Lumbosacral Spinal Manipulation

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine from which side of the spine the popping sound (PS) emanates during side-lying, rotatory high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust manipulation directed to the L5-S1 articulation using a time-frequency analysis. Secondary aims were to calculate the average number of PSs, the duration of lumbar thrust manipulation, and the duration of a single PS.MethodsThirty-four asymptomatic participants received 2 lumbar HVLA thrust manipulations targeting the right and left L5-S1 articulations. Two high sampling rate accelerometers were secured bilaterally 25 mm lateral to the midline of the L5-S1 interspace. For each manipulation, 2 audio signals were extracted and singularly processed via spectrogram calculation to obtain the release of energy over time on each side of the lumbosacral junction.ResultsDuring 60 HVLA thrust manipulations, it was measured a total of 320 PSs. Of those PSs, 176 occurred ipsilateral and 144 occurred contralateral to the targeted L5-S1 articulation; that is, the PS was no more likely to occur on the upside than the downside facet after right or left rotatory L5-S1 HVLA thrust manipulation. Moreover, PSs occurring on both sides at the same time were detected very rarely (ie, 2% of cases) with the lumbar HVLA thrust manipulations. The mean number of audible PSs per lumbosacral HVLA thrust manipulation was 5.27 (range 2-9). The mean duration of a single manipulation was 139.13 milliseconds (95% confidence interval: 5.61-493.79), and the mean duration of a single PS was 2.69 milliseconds (95% confidence interval: 0.95-4.59).ConclusionBased on our findings, spinal manipulative therapy practitioners should expect multiple PSs that most often occur on the upside or the downside facet articulations when performing HVLA thrust manipulation to the lumbosacral junction (ie, L5-S1). However, whether the multiple PSs found in this study emanated from the same joint or adjacent ipsilateral or contralateral facet joints remains unknown. A single model may not necessarily be able to explain all of the audible sounds during HVLA thrust manipulation.     

Effectiveness of manual physical therapy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review

Abstract

Study design: Systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

Objective: Review of current literature regarding the effectiveness of manual therapy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy.

Background: Cervical radiculopathy (CR) is a clinical condition frequently encountered in the physical therapy clinic. Cervical radiculopathy is a result of space occupying lesions in the cervical spine: either cervical disc herniations, spondylosis, or osteophytosis. These affect the pain generators of bony and ligamentous tissues, producing radicular symptoms (i.e. pain, numbness, weakness, paresthesia) observed in the upper extremity of patients with cervical nerve root pathology. Cervical radiculopathy has a reported annual incidence of 83·2 per 100?000 and an increased prevalence in the fifth decade of life among the general population.

Results: Medline and CINAHL via EBSCO, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were used to retrieve the randomized clinical trial studies for this review between the years of 1995 and February of 2011. Four studies met inclusion criteria and were considered to be high quality (PEDro scores of ?5). Manual therapy techniques included muscle energy techniques, non-thrust/thrust manipulation/mobilization of the cervical and/or thoracic spine, soft-tissue mobilization, and neural mobilization. In each study, manual therapy was either a stand-alone intervention or part of a multimodal approach which included therapeutic exercise and often some form of cervical traction. Although no clear cause and effect relationship can be established between improvement in radicular symptoms and manual therapy, results are generally promising.

Conclusion: Although a definitive treatment progression for treating CR has not been developed a general consensus exists within the literature that using manual therapy techniques in conjunction with therapeutic exercise is effective in regard to increasing function, as well as AROM, while decreasing levels of pain and disability. High quality RCTs featuring control groups are necessary to establish clear and effective protocols in the treatment of CR.     

Use of cervical spine manipulation under anesthesia for management of cervical disk herniation, cervical radiculopathy, and associated cervicogenic headache syndrome

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the benefits of cervical spine manipulation with the patient under anesthesia as an approach to treating a patient with chronic cervical disk herniation, associated cervical radiculopathy, and cervicogenic headache syndrome. CLINICAL FEATURES: The patient had neck pain with radiating paresthesia into the right upper extremity and incapacitating headaches and had no response to 6 months of conservative therapy. Treatment included spinal manipulative therapy, physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medication, and acupuncture. Magnetic resonance imaging, electromyography, and somatosensory evoked potential examination all revealed positive diagnostic findings. INTERVENTION AND OUTCOME: Treatment included 3 successive days of cervical spine manipulation with the patient under anesthesia. The patient had immediate relief after the first procedure. Her neck and arm pain were reported to be 50% better after the first trial, and her headaches were better by 80% after the third trial. Four months after the last procedure the patient reported a 95% improvement in her overall condition. CONCLUSION: Cervical spine manipulation with the patient under anesthesia has a place in the chiropractic arena. It is a useful tool for treating chronic discopathic disease complicated by cervical radiculopathy and cervicogenic headache syndrome. The beneficial results of this procedure are contingent on careful patient selection and proper training of qualified chiropractic physicians.     

Changes in Cervicocephalic Kinesthetic Sensibility,Widespread Pressure Pain Sensitivity,and Neck Pain After Cervical Thrust Manipulation in Patients With Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Objective

The purpose of the current randomized clinical trial was to examine the effects of cervical thrust manipulation or sham manipulation on cervicocephalic kinaesthetic sense, pain, pain-related disability, and pressure pain sensitivity in patients with mechanical neck pain.

Is systematic radiography needed before spinal manipulation? Recommendations of the SOFMMOO]

OBJECTIVES: The French National Health Authority recommends systematic radiography before lumbar manipulation. However, current research shows radiography to have more disadvantages than advantages. For the cervical spine, in cases of complication following cervical manipulation, the lack of prior radiography is a fault, even if such x-ray results would have advised manipulation. To establish clear recommendations on this topic, we searched in the literature for complications of spinal manipulations that could have been prevented had preliminary radiography been performed to determine whether these complications were anticipated or not by the international guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Literature search. RESULTS: For the lumbar and thoracic spine, the international guidelines are sufficient, except in cases of aneurysmal bone cyst, which can appear until the age of 25 years. For the cervical spine, despite a lack of data in the literature, prudence and medicolegal issues justify the performance of systematic radiography. CONCLUSION: The SOFMMOO recommends systematic radiography prior to cervical manipulation and in case of back or neck pain in patients of less than 25 years of age. In all other cases, the international guidelines provide sufficient recommendations.     

Decrease in elbow flexor inhibition after cervical spine manipulation in patients with chronic neck pain

OBJECTIVE: This study measured functional capacity and subjective pain in patients with chronic neck pain before and after manipulation of the cervical spine. DESIGN: Outcomes study on 16 patients with chronic neck pain. BACKGROUND: Muscle inhibition, i.e., the inability to fully activate a muscle, has been observed following joint pathologies and in low back pain conditions. Although chronic neck pain has been associated with changes in muscle recruitment and coordination in the shoulder and arms, the possibility of muscle inhibition has not been explored. METHODS: Biceps activation during a maximal voluntary elbow flexor contraction was assessed using the interpolated twitch technique and electromyography. Cervical range of motion and pressure pain thresholds were measured using a goniometer and an algometer. Manipulation of the cervical spine was applied at the level of C5/6/7, and functional assessments were repeated. RESULTS: Patients showed significant inhibition in their biceps muscles. Cervical range of motion was restricted laterally, and increased pressure pain sensitivity was evident. After cervical spine manipulation, a significant reduction in biceps inhibition and an increase in biceps force occurred. Cervical range of motion and pressure pain thresholds increased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Significant dysfunction in biceps activation was evident in patients with chronic neck pain, indicating that this muscle group cannot be used to the full extent. Spinal manipulation decreased muscle inhibition and increased elbow flexor strength at least in the short term. RELEVANCE: Muscle inhibition in the biceps has not been previously documented in patients with chronic neck pain. Further research is needed to establish whether muscle inhibition is related to clinical symptoms and functional outcome. Spinal manipulation improved muscle function, cervical range of motion and pain sensitivity, and might therefore be beneficial for treating patients with chronic neck pain.     

The Acute Effects of Manual and Instrument-Assisted Cervical Spine Manipulation on Pressure Pain Threshold,Pressure Pain Perception,and Muscle-Related Variables in Asymptomatic Subjects: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the immediate effects in asymptomatic participants of manual and instrument-assisted cervical manipulation on pressure pain thresholds, pressure pain perception, and muscle mechanical properties (tone, stiffness, and elasticity) over muscles anatomically related and unrelated to the manipulated level.MethodsFifty-nine asymptomatic participants (34 women and 25 men; age [mean ± standard deviation] = 21.1 ± 1.6 years) were randomly assigned to 4 groups in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Two groups received cervical (C3/C4) manipulation, 1 manual and the other instrument-assisted; the third group received a sham manipulation; and the fourth group served as the control. Bilateral pressure pain threshold, pressure pain perception, muscle tone, stiffness, and elasticity in the upper trapezius and biceps brachii were evaluated before and immediately after the interventions.ResultsAt baseline, there were no differences among the groups on any variable. After the interventions, a significant increase in pressure pain threshold was observed with both manual and instrument-assisted manipulation at local and distal sites (P < .05), whereas no changes were observed in either the control or the placebo group. The perception of pain pressure did not change significantly in any group. The interventions did not promote any statistically significant differences in muscle tone, elasticity, or stiffness at any site (local or distal).ConclusionCervical (C3/C4) manual and instrument-assisted manipulations produced an increase in pressure pain threshold bilaterally and over muscles related and unrelated to the vertebral segment, but had no effect on muscle tone, elasticity, or stiffness.