Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

Purpose

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and ticagrelor or prasugrel is the mainstay of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to systematically perform a head-to-head comparison of ticagrelor vs prasugrel in terms of efficacy and safety.

Methods

We searched PubMed/Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) for relevant published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was adverse cardiovascular events and secondary outcome was bleeding events. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to obtain the pooled estimate of each outcome.

Results

Nine RCTs with a total number of 6990 patients (3550 treated with prasugrel and 3481 treated with ticagrelor) were included. No significant difference between prasugrel and ticagrelor was observed in terms of mortality (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.13, P?=?0.28), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.03, P?=?0.10), non-fatal myocardial infarction (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.06, P?=?0.11), stroke (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.72, P?=?0.95), stent thrombosis (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.21, P?=?0.25), thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) defined major (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.19 to 4.67, P?=?0.94), minor (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.62, P?=?0.18) and minimal (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.19 to 1.18, P?=?0.11) bleeding and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) defined bleeding (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.36, P?=?0.68).

Conclusion

In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, both prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with similar cardiovascular outcomes and adverse bleeding events.

     

Impact of Acquired Thrombocytopenia on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundAcquired thrombocytopenia (aTP) is associated with a high frequency of bleeding and ischemic complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Herein, we report a meta-analysis evaluating the adverse effects of aTP on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality post-PCI.MethodsA literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and, clinicaltrials.gov from the inception of these databases through October 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) No Thrombocytopenia (nTP) and 2) Acquired Thrombocytopenia (aTP) after PCI. Primary endpoints were in-hospital, 30-day and all-cause mortality rates at the longest follow-up. The main summary estimate was random effects Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsSeven studies involving 57,247 participants were included. There was significantly increased in-hospital all-cause mortality (HR 10.73 [6.82–16.88]), MACE (HR 2.96 [2.24–3.94]), major bleeding (HR 4.78 [3.54–6.47]), and target vessel revascularization (TVR) (HR 7.53 [2.8–20.2]), in the aTP group compared to the nTP group. Similarly, aTP group had a statistically significant increased incidence of 30-day all-cause mortality (HR 6.08), MACE (HR 2.77), post-PCI MI (HR 1.98), TVR (HR 5.2), and major bleeding (HR 12.73). Outcomes at longest follow-up showed increased incidence of all-cause mortality (HR 3.98 [1.53–10.33]) and MACE (HR 1.24 [0.99–1.54]) in aTP group, while there was no significant difference for post-PCI MI (HR 0.94 [0.37–2.39]) and TVR (HR 0.96 [0.69–1.32]) between both groups.ConclusionsAcquired Thrombocytopenia after PCI is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, adverse bleeding events and the need for in-hospital and 30-day TVR.     

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Prasugrel Versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose

To assess the efficacy and safety of low-dose prasugrel compared to clopidogrel based on the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and major bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were systematically searched up to May 2020 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model to estimate relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The primary efficacy and safety endpoints were MACE and major bleeding, respectively.

Results

Three RCTs (n?=?2884) and five observational studies (n?=?30,117) were included. A meta-analysis of RCTs revealed no significant differences in terms of MACE (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.16) or major bleeding (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.65) between low-dose prasugrel and clopidogrel. A meta-analysis of observational studies revealed no significant difference in terms of MACE (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.55) between the two groups, but low-dose prasugrel was associated with a significantly increased risk of major bleeding (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.72).

Conclusions

We found that low-dose prasugrel was not associated with changes in MACE or major bleeding compared with clopidogrel in RCTs. However, analysis of data from observational studies revealed that low-dose prasugrel was associated with an increased risk of major bleeding compared with clopidogrel.

     

养心氏片在冠状动脉介入治疗中应用的系统评价

目的系统评价养心氏片在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中的应用情况。方法计算机结合人工检索中国知网、万方、维普(VIP)、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、EMbase、Web of Science及Cochrane图书馆等数据库,检索时间为建库至2021年6月,文献类型包括临床研究、基础研究、病例报告等,临床研究质量评价参照改良的Jadad量表。应用中国知网数据库对文献进行可视化分析。结果共检索出养心氏片在PCI中应用的文献17篇,其中临床研究9篇,病例报告3篇,基础研究5篇。对9篇临床研究质量评价,5篇4分,4篇3分。养心氏片在PCI中应用涉及改善PCI再灌注损伤、术后焦虑抑郁、术后胸痛、术后生活质量等,其可能的机制包括抗氧化应激损伤、抑制炎症反应、促血管生成、影响心肌代谢等。可视化分析显示养心氏片在PCI中应用的研究逐年增加,正受到研究机构的重视。结论养心氏片在PCI病人中应用具有前景,但需进一步开展高质量的研究加以验证及阐释机制。     

Early vs Late Discharge in Low-Risk ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Treated With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundFor low-risk patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) the recommended optimal discharge timing is inconsistent in guidelines. The European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend early discharge within 48–72 h, while the American College of Cardiology guidelines do not recommend a specific discharge strategy. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we compared outcomes with early discharge (≤3 days) versus late discharge (>3 days).MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were selected after searching MEDLINE and EMBASE database. Meta-analysis was stratified according to study design. Outcomes were reported as random effects risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals.ResultsSeven RCTs comprising 1780 patients and 4 observational studies comprising 39,288 patients were selected. The RCT-restricted analysis did not demonstrate significant differences in terms of all-cause mortality (RR, 0.97 [0.23–4.05]) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (RR, 0.84 [0.56–1.26]). Conversely, observational study restricted analysis showed that early vs late discharge strategy was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality (RR, 0.40 [0.23–0.71]) and MACE (RR, 0.45 [0.26–0.78]). There were no significant differences in hospital readmissions between early vs late discharge in both RCT or observational study analyses.ConclusionsEarly discharge strategy in appropriately selected low-risk patients with STEMI undergoing PCI is safe and it has the potential to improve cost of care.     

Blood Transfusion After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Risk of Subsequent Adverse Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ObjectivesThis study sought to define the prevalence and prognostic impact of blood transfusions in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practice.BackgroundAlthough the presence of anemia is associated with adverse outcomes in patients undergoing PCI, the optimal use of blood products in patients undergoing PCI remains controversial.MethodsA search of EMBASE and MEDLINE was conducted to identify PCI studies that evaluated blood transfusions and their association with major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and mortality. Two independent reviewers screened the studies for inclusion, and data were extracted from relevant studies. Random effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the risk of adverse outcomes with blood transfusions. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed by considering the I² statistic.ResultsNineteen studies that included 2,258,711 patients with more than 54,000 transfusion events were identified (prevalence of blood transfusion 2.3%). Crude mortality rate was 6,435 of 50,979 (12.6%, 8 studies) in patients who received a blood transfusion and 27,061 of 2,266,111 (1.2%, 8 studies) in the remaining patients. Crude MACE rates were 17.4% (8,439 of 48,518) in patients who had a blood transfusion and 3.1% (68,062 of 2,212,730) in the remaining cohort. Meta-analysis demonstrated that blood transfusion was independently associated with an increase in mortality (odds ratio: 3.02, 95% confidence interval: 2.16 to 4.21, I² = 91%) and MACE (odds ratio: 3.15, 95% confidence interval: 2.59 to 3.82, I² = 81%). Similar observations were recorded in studies that adjusted for baseline hematocrit, anemia, and bleeding.ConclusionsBlood transfusion is independently associated with increased risk of mortality and MACE events. Clinicians should minimize the risk for periprocedural transfusion by using available bleeding-avoidance strategies and avoiding liberal transfusion practices.     

Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IntroductionPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has emerged as a reasonable alternative to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery in well-selected patients with unprotected left main coronary disease (LMCD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim of assessing the impact of sex on outcomes of PCI in patients with unprotected LMCD.MethodsA systematic search of PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases was performed to identify studies comparing the outcomes of men vs. women among patients undergoing PCI for unprotected LMCD. The primary outcome of interest was study defined major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and secondary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis and stroke. For all outcomes, pooled odds ratios (OR) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird random-effects model.ResultsSix studies with a total of 6515 individuals (4954 men, 1561women) with a mean follow up of 36 months were included in the analysis. MACE and MI were significantly higher in women with OR of 1.17 (95% CI 1.01–1.36; p = 0.03) and 1.42 (95% CI 1.07–1.87; p = 0.01) respectively. All-cause mortality, cardiac mortality, and TLR were similar among men and women.ConclusionOur meta-analysis suggests that women undergoing PCI for unprotected LMCD have higher rates of MACE and MI compared to men.     

Risk of Bleeding on Triple Antithrombotic Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

There are no reported randomized controlled trials of triple antithrombotic therapy (TT; aspirin plus a thienopyridine plus vitamin K antagonist) vs dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT; aspirin plus a thienopyridine) among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting (PCI-S). A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to assess the risk of bleeding among patients receiving TT after PCI-S.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched for studies reporting bleeding among patients receiving TT after PCI-S. Of the 4108 articles screened, 18 met study inclusion criteria and underwent detailed data extraction: of these, 6 reported in-hospital outcomes, 14 reported 30-day outcomes, and 9 reported 6-month outcomes. At each time point, pooled estimates of bleeding with TT were ascertained and where possible summary odds ratios (ORs) for comparative risks vs DAPT were calculated.

Results

The pooled estimate of major bleeding rate with TT post PCI-S was 2.38% by 30 days postprocedure (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-3.77%) and 4.55% by 6 months postdischarge (95% CI, 0.56-8.53%). At 30 days and 6 months the rates of major bleeding with TT were significantly higher than those observed with DAPT: OR, 2.38 at 30 days (95% CI, 1.05-5.38) and OR, 2.87 at 6 months (95% CI, 1.47-5.62).

Conclusions

This systematic review and meta-analysis of reports of triple therapy with a vitamin K antagonist, aspirin, and clopidogrel after PCI-S provides precise and valid bleeding risk data. Based on existing observational studies the rates of major and any bleeding associated with TT are clinically important and significantly greater than those reported with DAPT.     

Systematic Review of Hirudin in Acute Coronary Syndromes and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Thrombin plays a key role in the pathogenesis of acute coronary syndromes because it is a potent platelet agonist and converts fibrinogen to fibrin. Hirudin is a powerful, direct, and specific antithrombin agent that can be used in many therapeutic scenarios in which heparin is routinely used. In this systemic review, we summarize evidence from randomized clinical trials evaluating the benefits and risks of recombinant hirudin for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes and patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.     

Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Coronary Atherosclerosis and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IntroductionThe role of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in atherosclerosis progression and neointimal growth after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on EPCs in patients who had PCI.MethodsWe searched Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane databases and reviewed cited references up to August 31, 2021. Overall, we selected 9 studies, including 4612 patients.ResultsLower baseline EPC count was associated with a significantly greater occurrence of in-stent restenosis (HR 1.33; 95% CI 0.97–1.82, P = 0.045). As for EPC coating, there was no significant difference in the 1-year occurrence of cardiac death between EPCs-capturing drug-eluting stents (DES) and standard DES (Relative Risk [RR] 1.146; 95% CI 0.666–1.974, P = 0.98), but target lesion revascularization (RR 1.727; 95% CI: 1.199–2.487, P = 0.025), and target vessel failure (RR 1.591; 95% CI 1.213–2.088, P = 0.04) were significantly more common with EPCs-capturing DES than with standard DES.ConclusionCirculating EPC count might improve risk stratification after PCI, as it is correlated with the occurrence of in-stent restenosis. Currently available EPCs-capturing DES use was associated with an increased risk of 1-year adverse events, mainly driven by an increase in target lesion revascularization and target vessel failure, not cardiac death.     

Outcomes with Drug-Coated Balloons in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Diabetic Patients

BackgroundPercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) remains associated with inferior clinical outcomes and an increased risk of restenosis compared with non-diabetics even in the era of drug-eluting stents (DES). The outcomes with drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in diabetic patients have received limited study.MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis of all studies published between January 2000 and January 2019 reporting the outcomes with DCB vs. DES after PCI of de-novo coronary lesions in diabetic patients. Outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target lesion revascularization (TLR), binary restenosis by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), and late lumen loss (LLL).ResultsThree studies with 378 patients (440 lesions) were included in the meta-analysis. During 17.3 ± 11.3 months follow-up, DCB were associated with a similar risk of MACE (OR: 0.63, 95% CI [0.36, 1.12], p = 0.11), TLR (OR: 0.51, 95% CI [0.25, 1.06] p = 0.07), binary restenosis (OR: 0.42, 95% CI [0.09, 1.92], p = 0.26), and LLL (mean difference: −0.13 mm, 95% CI [−0.41, 0.14], p = 0.34) compared with DES.ConclusionIn diabetic patients with de-novo coronary lesions undergoing PCI, DCBs are associated with similar outcomes compared with first-generation DES, with a signal toward potential benefit in lowering target lesion revascularization. Further randomized studies are needed to compare the newer-generation DCBs and DES in this setting.     

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Hospital Volume and the Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Previous reviews have suggested that hospital volume is inversely related to in-hospital mortality. However, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) practices have changed substantially in recent years, and whether this relationship persists remains controversial.A systematic search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies that describe the effect of hospital volume on the outcomes of PCI. Critical appraisals of the methodological quality and the risk of bias were conducted independently by 2 authors. Fourteen of 96 potentiality relevant articles were included in the analysis. Twelve of the articles described the relationship between hospital volume and mortality and included data regarding odds ratios (ORs); 3 studies described the relationship between hospital volume and long-term survival, and only 1 study included data regarding hazard ratios (HRs). A meta-analysis of postoperative mortality was performed using a random effects model, and the pooled effect estimate was significantly in favor of high volume providers (OR: 0.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72–0.86; P < 0.001). A systematic review of long-term survival was performed, and a trend toward better long-term survival in high volume hospitals was observed.This meta-analysis only included studies published after 2006 and revealed that postoperative mortality following PCI correlates significantly and inversely with hospital volume. However, the magnitude of the effect of volume on long-term survival is difficult to assess. Additional research is necessary to confirm our findings and to elucidate the mechanism underlying the volume–outcome relationship.     

Impact of Diabetes Mellitus on Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Total Occlusions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundPatients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have a high prevalence of coronary chronic total occlusions (CTOs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to characterize outcomes after CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients without or with DM.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar were queried for studies comparing non-DM vs. DM patients undergoing attempted CTO PCI. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at longest follow-up (at least 6 months). Secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) which is a composite endpoint including myocardial infarction, cardiac or all-cause mortality and any revascularization in patients after CTO PCI, target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), Japanese chronic total occlusion (J-CTO) score and prevalence of multivessel (MV) CTO disease. We used a random effects model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsSixteen studies, including 2 randomized control trials and 14 observational studies, met inclusion criteria. At longest follow-up, all-cause mortality (OR 0.54 [95% CI 0.37–0.80], p < 0.0001) and MACE (OR 0.82 [95% CI 0.72–0.93], p < 0.00001) were significantly lower in non-DM CTO patients. MV CTO disease was less prevalent in patients without DM (OR 0.80 [95% CI 0.69–0.93], p = 0.004). However, there were no differences in MI, TVR and J-CTO score.ConclusionsNon-diabetics undergoing CTO PCI have lower all-cause mortality and MACE than diabetics. Future research may determine if DM control improves diabetics' CTO PCI outcomes.     

Reduced Oxidative Stress in STEMI Patients Treated by Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and with Antioxidant Therapy: A Systematic Review

Purpose

Coronary reperfusion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been established as an essential therapy of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although the coronary intervention is undoubtedly beneficial, reperfusion itself can induce processes resulting in additional myocardial damage—a phenomenon known as ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). Oxidative stress is one of the major factors contributing to IRI. This systematic review focuses on the effect of antioxidant therapy on reperfusion triggered oxidative stress and myocardial IRI in patients with STEMI.

Methods

We performed a systematic search in EMBASE and Pubmed and included eight randomised clinical trials evaluating edaravone, allopurinol, vitamin c, nicorandil, N-acetylcysteine, glucose-insulin-potassium, atorvastatin and deferoxamine.

Results

Administration of edaravone, allopurinol, atorvastatin and nicorandil as a supplement to primary PCI significantly reduced oxidative stress and myocardial damage as well as improved cardiac function and clinical outcomes. Treatment with deferoxamine and N-acetylcysteine reduced the oxidative stress but an effect on the clinical outcome parameters could not be shown.

Conclusions

Preliminary studies of edaravone, allopurinol, atorvastatin and nicorandil seems promising though larger clinical trials with a wider range of clinical outcome parameters and trials of higher methodological quality should confirm the clinical benefits before a general recommendation can be given. Moreover, the included studies revealed a complex link between oxidative stress and cardiac function and/or cardiac adverse events and in order to further elucidate the detrimental role of oxidative stress in IRI in relation to primary PCI the assessment of oxidative stress and the clinical outcome parameters should be standardized.     

Outcomes for Cancer Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background/PurposeThe incidence of cardiovascular disease in cancer patients is rising. The risk of in-hospital complications for cancer patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is not well defined.Methods/MaterialsA retrospective single-center cohort assessing STEMI patients with a history of cancer (n = 58) and without a history of cancer (n = 551) who underwent primary PCI between January 1, 2012 and June 30, 2017 was conducted. The primary outcome was a composite of in-hospital complications including reinfarction, cardiogenic shock, new heart failure, stroke, new atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, cardiac arrest, bleeding, new dialysis requirement, mechanical circulatory support, hospice requirement, and in-hospital mortality.ResultsOverall in-hospital complications occurred in 229 (37.6%) patients. There was no significant difference in overall complications in patients with a history of cancer (39.7%), compared to those without a cancer history (37.4%) (adjusted OR 0.84 [0.46–1.51], p = 0.58; unadjusted OR 1.10 [0.61–1.92], p = 0.73); there were no differences exhibited in any of the individual complications. Patients with a history of cancer were significantly more likely to be readmitted within 30 days (12.7% vs. 5%; p = 0.03) and receive bare metal stents (50% vs. 30.4%; p = 0.004) as compared to patients without a history of cancer.ConclusionsThere was no significant difference for in-hospital complications in patients with a history of cancer and those without a history of cancer undergoing primary PCI for STEMI. Patients with a history of cancer were more likely to readmitted within 30 days and receive bare metal stents.SummaryThe risk of in-hospital complications for cancer patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI is not well defined. In a single-center retrospective cohort, there was no significant difference for in-hospital complications between patients with a history of cancer and those without a history of cancer undergoing primary PCI for STEMI.     

Prevention of Contrast‐Induced Nephropathy in STEMI Patients Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review

Objective

To evaluate the current prophylactic strategies against CIN in patients with STEMI treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Background

Contrast‐induced nephropathy (CIN) is the third leading course of acute renal failure and a recognized complication to cardiac catheterization. CIN is associated with increased risk of cardiac adverse events and mortality, and recent studies point at the risk of developing a transient or persistent renal dysfunction. Patients with ST‐elevation myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention have a markedly increased risk of developing CIN. At present no strategy is universally accepted in the prevention of CIN in the acute setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Method

We performed a systematic search in Pubmed and EMBASE and ended up including nine randomised clinical trials; six studies of N‐acetylcysteine, one study of early and late hydration regimens, one study of recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide and one study comparing a low‐osmolar contrast agent with an iso‐osmolar contrast agent.

Results

Recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide and the regimens of hydration significantly reduced the incidence of CIN and administration of N‐acetylcysteine in one of the six studies significantly reduced the occurrence of CIN. The iso‐osmolar contrast agent was not proven to be superior to the low‐osmolar contrast agent in terms of preventing CIN.

Conclusion

Preliminary studies are promising but further studies are needed before any prevention strategy against CIN can be recommended in routine care of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for STEMI. (J Interven Cardiol 2013;26:97–105)

     

Impact of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is highly prevalent in patients with heart failure (HF) and accounts for nearly two-thirds of cases. The use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in HF patients with CAD has markedly increased and has been suggested to be associated with improved outcomes in numerous observational studies. Randomized data comparing the impact of PCI with that of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) or contemporary guideline-directed medical therapy alone on clinical outcomes and myocardial recovery in patients with HF are lacking. The purpose of this review is to describe the available evidence regarding the impact of PCI in acute HF (in the presence and absence of an acute coronary syndrome), chronic HF with reduced ejection fraction, and HF with preserved ejection fraction. Adequately-powered randomized clinical trials examining the outcomes with PCI in these distinct HF populations are warranted.     

Impact of Stent Types on In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients With Cancer Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Nationwide Analysis

BackgroundCardiovascular disease and cancer frequently coexist, and patients with cancer are at increased risk of cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction and stroke. However, the impact of stent types on in-hospital outcomes of patients with malignancy is largely unknown.MethodsPatients with concomitant diagnosis of cancer undergoing PCI between January 2005 and December 2014 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample. They were then categorized into those who have undergone coronary stenting with bare-metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES). Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and stent thrombosis. Adjusted and unadjusted analysis was employed on appropriate variables of interest.Results8755 patients were included in the BMS group and 11,611 patients in the DES group. Following propensity matching, 4313 patients were randomly selected in both groups using a 1:1 ratio. There was high use of BMS stent in cancer patient (BMS 43.0%, DES 57.0%) compared to general population (BMS 23.2%, DES 76.8%). When comparing BMS to DES group, there was no statistically significant difference in mortality (4.7% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.097), acute kidney injury (11.3% vs. 10.6%, p = 0.425), bleeding complications (3.50% vs. 3.45%, p = 0.914), and length of hospital stay (5.4% vs. 5.2%, p = 0.119). However, an increased incidence of stent thrombosis was observed in the DES group (4.26% vs. 3.01%, p = 0.002).ConclusionA higher incidence of BMS placement was noted in patients with cancer than in the general population. Paradoxically there was a high incidence of stent thrombosis in the DES group without increasing mortality.