髋臼横韧带定位髋臼假体前倾校正骨盆旋转

目的通过观察后外侧入路全髋关节置换术中骨盆的旋转变化，探讨术中骨盆旋转对髋臼假体前倾角植入的影响，评估使用髋臼横韧带作髋臼假体前倾定位的准确性以及对骨盆旋转角度变化的校正作用。 方法2015年1月至2016年1月河池市第三人民医院关节外科收治的行初次THA的40例44髋的髋关节疾病患者纳入本研究。纳入标准为：初次THA术的患者，术前、术后CT扫描质量符合标准、能确定髋臼解剖前倾角、髋臼假体前倾角的患者。排除标准：髋臼发育不良、强直性脊柱炎、既往有髋关节严重创伤手术史以及翻修术等，术前、术后双髋关节CT扫描，CT横断面上骨盆明显倾斜、两侧髋关节的中心显示明显不在同一层面、难以确定水平线测量前倾角的患者，予以排除。手术均采用侧卧位后外侧入路，切皮前将1枚施氏针以垂直于地面方向打入髂骨嵴，术中髋臼假体的前倾角，以髋臼横韧带为参照标志，通过直接参照或间接参照髋臼横韧带进行髋臼挫磨及安装臼杯，使髋臼假体开口平行韧带进行安放，在此过程中用摄像机记录施氏针相对于地面的角度变化，确定手术过程中骨盆旋转度数，同时测量并记录挫磨髋臼及安放假体时，相对于身体长轴髋臼手术前倾角的数值。术后通过CT测量髋臼假体前倾角，对术中手术前倾角和术后髋臼假体的前倾角、术前髋臼解剖前倾角数据进行t检验分析。 结果术中骨盆旋转发生在本研究中的平均度数为(18±4)°。44个髋关节中，所有的病例都能对髋臼横韧带进行辨认，术中手术前倾角平均为(33±5)°，有93%(41髋)的病例大于Lewinnek提出的"安全区"的前倾角上限25°，余下的7%(3个髋)也全部大于24°。术后CT测量髋臼假体的解剖前倾角为(21±10)°，与术前髋臼解剖前倾角度(19±7)°比较，差异无统计学意义(t＝1.264，P >0.05)。 结论在后外侧入路THA术中，体位改变骨盆前旋转会影响髋臼假体植入的准确性，使用髋臼横韧带作为解剖标志指导髋臼假体前倾角度的植入，可以排除患者体位改变骨盆旋转对前倾角的影响，提高髋臼假体放置的准确性。     

The area method for measuring acetabular cup anteversion: An accurate and autonomous solution

Several radiological methods of measuring anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty have been described, all time-consuming and with varying reproducibility. This study aimed to compare the recently proposed Area method to true cup anteversion as determined by an accelerometer. This study further applied this method programmatically to autonomously determine radiographic cup orientation using two computer programs, then compared these results to hand and accelerometer measurements. 160 anteroposterior pelvis radiographs were taken of a standard Sawbones® pelvis fitted with a total hip arthroplasty system. The acetabular cup was re-oriented between each radiograph, with anteversion ranging from 0° to 90°. An accelerometer was mounted to the cup to measure true cup anteversion. Radiographic anteversion was independently measured via three methods: by hand, linear image processing, and machine learning. Measurements were compared to triaxial accelerometer recordings. Coefficient of determination (R2) was found to be 0.997, 0.991, and 0.989 for hand measurements, the machine learning, and linear image processing, respectively. The machine learning program and hand measurements overestimated anteversion by 0.70° and 0.02° respectively. The program using linear techniques underestimated anteversion by 5.02°. Average runtime was 0.03 and 0.59 s for the machine learning and linear image processing program, respectively. The machine learning program averaged within 1° of cup orientation given a true cup anteversion less than 51°, and within 2° given an anteversion less than 85°. The Area method showed great accuracy and reliability with hand measurements compared to true anteversion. The results of this study support the use of machine learning for accurate, timely, autonomous assessment of cup orientation.     

The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component anteversion

The combined anteversion technique for acetabular component placement of total hip arthroplasty is beneficial because of the surgeons' limited ability to control the anteversion of a cementless femoral stem. Our data show that the cementless stem anteversion can be 15 degrees different than anticipated. By determining femoral stem anteversion before positioning cup anteversion, the cup anteversion can be adjusted for the stem anteversion. The combined anteversion technique should provide a mean near 35 degrees with a safe zone of 25 degrees to 50 degrees.     

Poor accuracy of freehand cup positioning during total hip arthroplasty

Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between the acetabular cup position and the risk of dislocation, wear and range of motion after total hip arthroplasty. The present study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of the surgeon’s estimated position of the cup after freehand placement in total hip replacement. Peroperative estimated abduction and anteversion of 200 acetabular components (placed by three orthopaedic surgeons and nine residents) were compared with measured outcomes (according to Pradhan) on postoperative radiographs. Cups were placed in 49.7° (SD 6.7) of abduction and 16.0° (SD 8.1) of anteversion. Estimation of placement was 46.3° (SD 4.3) of abduction and 14.6° (SD 5.9) of anteversion. Of more interest is the fact that for the orthopaedic surgeons the mean inaccuracy of estimation was 4.1° (SD 3.9) for abduction and 5.2° (SD 4.5) for anteversion and for their residents this was respectively, 6.3° (SD 4.6) and 5.7° (SD 5.0). Significant differences were found between orthopaedic surgeons and residents for inaccuracy of estimation for abduction, not for anteversion. Body mass index, sex, (un)cemented fixation and surgical approach (anterolateral or posterolateral) were not significant factors. Based upon the inaccuracy of estimation, the group’s chance on future cup placement within Lewinnek’s safe zone (5–25° anteversion and 30–50° abduction) is 82.7 and 85.2% for anteversion and abduction separately. When both parameters are combined, the chance of accurate placement is only 70.5%. The chance of placement of the acetabular component within 5° of an intended position, for both abduction and anteversion is 21.5% this percentage decreases to just 2.9% when the tolerated error is 1°. There is a tendency to underestimate both abduction and anteversion. Orthopaedic surgeons are superior to their residents in estimating abduction of the acetabular component. The results of this study indicate that freehand placement of the acetabular component is not a reliable method. No benefits or funds were received in support of this study.     

Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion.

Impingement between femoral neck and endoprosthetic cup is one of the causes for dislocation in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Choosing a correct combined orientation of both components, the acetabular cup and femoral stem, in manual or computer-assisted implantation will yield a maximized, stable range of motion (ROM) and will reduce the risk for dislocation. A mathematical model of a THA was developed to determine the optimal combination of cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem antetorsion for maximizing ROM and minimizing the risk for cup-neck impingement. Single and combined hip joint motions were tested. A radiographic definition was used for component orientation. Additional parameters, such as stem-neck (CCD) angle, head-neck ratio, and the design of the acetabular opening, were also considered. The model showed that a maximized and safe ROM requires compliant, well-defined combinations of cup inclination, cup anteversion, and stem antetorsion depending on the intended ROM. Radiographic cup anteversion and stem antetorsion were linearly correlated. Additional internal rotation reduced flexion, and additional external rotation reduced extension, abduction and adduction. The articulating hemispheric surface of acetabular cups should be oriented between 40 degrees and 45 degrees of radiographic inclination, between 20 degrees and 28 degrees of radiographic cup anteversion, and should be combined with stem antetorsion so that the sum of cup anteversion plus 0.7 times the stem antetorsion equals 37 degrees. Final component orientation must also consider cup containment, implant impingement with bone and soft tissue, and preoperative skeletal contractures or deformities to achieve the optimal compromise for each patient.     

三维定向监测装置的研制及其对提高髋关节臼杯假体置放精确度的验证研究

目的探讨新型三维定向监测装置通过螺杆与骨盆刚性连接，达到避免体位改变的干扰，从而提高髋关节假体臼杯置放精确的有效性。方法分别应用传统机械定位器及所研制的三维定向监测装置对尸体标本进行预设角度的臼杯置人、角度测定仪及CT三维重建测量臼杯外展角及前倾角真实值以行验证。结果三维定向监测装置引导臼杯置入，角度偏差在5°范围内，作臼杯置人的重复行试验，两次间臼杯外展角（t=1．383，P〉0．05）、前倾角（t=1．918，P〉0．05）间的差异均无统计学意义。结论在不同的设定角度下，三维定向监测装置能较精确地引导臼杯置入，较传统机械定位器精确，定位操作的可重复性较传统机械定位器优胜。     

Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system

Positioning the acetabular component is one of the most important steps in total hip arthroplasty; malpositioned components can result in dislocations, impingement, limited range of motion, and increased polyethylene wear. Conventional surgery makes use of specialized alignment guides provided by the manufacturers of the implants. The use of mechanical guides has been shown to result in large variations of cup inclination and version. We investigated acetabular cup alignment with the nonimage-based hip navigation system compared with a conventional mechanically guided procedure in 12 human cadavers. Postoperative cup position relative to the pelvic reference plane was assessed in both groups with the use of a three-dimensional digitizing arm. In the navigated group, a median inclination of 45.5 degrees and a median anteversion of 21.9 degrees (goals, 45 degrees and 20 degrees) were reached. In the control group, the median inclination was 41.8 degrees and the median anteversion was 24.6 degrees. The ninetieth percentile showed a much wider range for the control group (36.1 degrees-51.8 degrees inclination, 15 degrees-33.5 degrees anteversion) than for the navigated group (43.9 degrees-48.2 degrees inclination, 18.3 degrees-25.4 degrees anteversion). This cadaver study shows that computer-assisted cup positioning using a nonimage-based hip navigation system allowed for more consistent placement of the acetabular component.     

The acetabulum: The elusive home run of THR

The objective is to describe the current factors for optimizing positioning of the acetabular component in THR. The emphasis in cup placement today is personalizing the component position for each patientʼs anatomy rather than a “one size fits all” (always put the cup in the same position such as 45° inclination and 15° anteversion). To individualize, the arthroplasty requires remembering the operation is on both sides of the joint (combined anteversion) and implanting the cup in the functional plane of that patient, which requires knowledge of the pelvic tilt at surgery and the changes in the spine−pelvic−hip construct between standing and sitting for that patient. To individualize, the cup position will demand higher precision than has been accepted in the past, such as computer navigation, to augment the experience and instinct of the surgeon in performing total hip replacement. In conclusion, acetabular cup placement is an elusive home run because the complexity of its positioning for each patient requires new preoperative planning, and more precise intraoperative positioning.     

Comparison of fluoroscopic and imageless registration in surgical navigation of the acetabular component.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the repeatability and reproducibility of acetabular component positioning using imageless and fluoroscopic-referenced navigation methods. METHODS: A single cadaveric pelvis had a modular acetabular component securely fixed. Cup position was evaluated using imageless and fluoroscopic registration techniques. These were compared to measurements of a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) and a validated CT scan protocol. RESULTS: The CMM-determined anatomical acetabular inclination measurement was 46.02 degrees (SD = 1.07), while the CMM-determined anatomical anteversion (pubic symphysis) was 15.79 degrees (SD = 0.41). Computed tomography revealed inclination of 42.2 degrees (SD = 0.65); anteversion with pubic tubercle referencing of 12.1 degrees (SD = 0.14); and anteversion with pubic symphysis referencing of 14.3 degrees (SD = 0.89). Evaluation of repeatability (one surgeon; n = 8) with the imageless system (pubic tubercle) revealed inclination of 41.8 degrees (SD = 0.46) and anteversion of 11.2 degrees (SD = 0.8). For the fluoroscopic system (pubic symphysis), inclination was 42.8 degrees (SD = 1.6) and anteversion was 17.6 degrees (SD = 3.1). Evaluation of reproducibility (three surgeons; n = 24) with the imageless system revealed inclination of 41.8 degrees (SD = 0.82) and anteversion of 15.2 degrees (SD = 1.06). For the fluoroscopic system, inclination was 48.5 degrees (SD = 0.9) and anteversion was 17.8 degrees (SD = 2.5). Imageless referencing of cup inclination and anteversion were found to be process capable using the Six Sigma Cp and Cpk capability indices. Fluoroscopic referencing was process capable for cup inclination but not for cup anteversion (Cp - 1.1; Cpk - 1.0). An F-test revealed significantly greater variance with fluoroscopic referenced anteversion (p < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Imageless referencing was process capable for computer navigation of cup placement in the ex-vivo setting. Fluoroscopic referencing for pelvic landmarks is problematic as locating points from radiographic images is difficult, especially for cup anteversion.     

Anteversion of the acetabular component aligned with the transverse acetabular ligament in total hip arthroplasty

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), accurately positioning the cup is crucial for achieving an adequate postoperative range of motion and stability. For 47 THA cases in which the inferomedial rim of the cup had been positioned parallel to the transverse acetabular ligament, we retrospectively performed the measurements of the radiographic cup anteversion angle relative to the anterior pelvic plane using 3-dimensional reconstruction computed tomography. The mean anteversion angle was 21.2°, with no significant difference detected in mean cup anteversion between the dysplastic hip group (15 hips) and the control group (15 hips). We suggest that the transverse acetabular ligament is a practical anatomical landmark for determining cup anteversion in THA for both dysplastic and nondysplastic hip cases.     

Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion

This retrospective study compared the efficacy of computer navigation and conventional freehand techniques to place acetabular component orientation in the target position of acetabular cup inclination of 45 degrees and anteversion of 20 degrees . We selected 69 patients who had undergone total hip arthroplasty with freehand cup insertion who had computed tomography (CT) to plan for acetabular cup placement of the contralateral side. This group was compared with 98 patients who underwent CT-based cup insertion, and all had postoperative CT. After CT-based cup placement, average cup position was 43 degrees inclination (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.97; range, 30 degrees -58 degrees ) and 22.2 degrees anteversion (95% CI, 1.72; range, 5 degrees -38 degrees ). For freehand, average cup position was 45.7 degrees inclination (95% CI, 2.63 degrees ; range, 26 degrees -64 degrees ) and 28.5 degrees anteversion (95% CI, 3.80 degrees ; range, 9 degrees -53 degrees ). F ratio was 5.56 for inclination and 3.67 for anteversion (P < .0001). This study demonstrated substantial statistical improvement in accuracy of cup placement using CT-based navigation compared with freehand methods.     

液晶数字显示角度仪在全髋关节置换术中的应用价值

目的:探讨在全髋关节置换术中使用液晶数字显示角度仪控制前倾角的应用价值。方法:回顾分析自2018年1月至2019年12月83例行初次全髋关节置换术的患者,其中男28例,女55例;年龄42~81(70.4±7.9)岁。股骨颈骨折63例,股骨头缺血性坏死20例。所有患者术中使用液晶数显角度仪控制髋臼杯假体的前倾角,术后采用CT扫描,测量髋臼杯的前倾角,两者进行比较,了解使用液晶数显角度仪的准确性。结果:术后CT测量提示患者的髋臼前倾角均位于Lewinnek提倡的安全区内,术中使用液晶数显角度仪测量髋臼杯的前倾角度中位数为14.20°(12.80~15.40)°,术后CT扫描测量的髋臼杯的前倾角中位数为14.20°(13.40~15.50)°,两者比较差异无统计学意义(Z=-1.725,P=0.085)。结论:应用液晶数显角仪器对术中控制髋臼杯的前倾角是一种准确可靠的方法,具有良好的辅助参考价值。     

Using intraoperative pelvic landmarks for acetabular component placement in total hip arthroplasty

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty is frequently due to acetabular malpositioning. Positioning of the acetabular component using anatomical landmarks may reduce the incidence of dislocation from improper acetabular orientation. The pelvis provides 3 bony landmarks (ilium, superior pubic ramus, and superior acetabulum), which, when used to define a plane, allows cup orientation in abduction and version. Landmarks evaluated in 24 cadaveric acetabuli allowed slightly increased abduction and anteversion of the cup, compared with native acetabuli. Six hundred seventeen primary total hip arthroplasties were performed between 1996 and 2003 using this technique. Mean cup abduction was 44.4 degrees with 13.2 degrees of anteversion. This technique allows satisfactory reproducible cup orientation based on individual pelvic morphology. Review of patient outcome data suggest high patient satisfaction and lower dislocation rate without additional equipment, time, or cost.     

Computer-assisted navigated cup placement of different cup types in hip arthroplasty--a randomised controlled trial]

AIM:The position of the acetabular implant has a great influence on the outcome of total hip arthroplasty. The acetabular implants differ in their characteristics during insertion. In order to control the influence of the implant in different axes, 80 implantations of acetabular component were performed under computer-assisted control by a surogate navigation system. METHOD: Within a prospective randomised study, 70 total hip replacements were performed by one surgeon using two different uncemented implants (PPF screw cup/Hedrocel pressfit cup). The position of the cup was measured at different times during surgery and was compared to 10 cemented PE cup placements. RESULTS: During the milling procedure the anteversion of the two uncemented cups differed significantly (p = 0.026). The standard deviation of anteversion during implantation different significantly relating to the cup type: press-fit cup 3.86 degrees, screw cup 2.1 degrees and cemented PE cups 0,84 degrees. The inclination was less susceptible. CONCLUSION: The cup design of uncemented acetabular implants influences the outcome of surgery. In our trial a spherical press-fit cup showed a greater variability than the screw-cup. The CAS system can be used as a tool to minimise these effects.     

A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs

Plain radiographs are the most important diagnostic means for determining the indication and following up on total hip arthroplasty. The acetabular cup position can be easily determined by applying trigonometric functions. This report presents an even simpler method. The short axis of the projected ellipse is measured and related to the total cross-section of the projected cup along the short axis. This relationship correlates with acetabular cup anteversion angles and represents an inverse sinus function. A close linear correlation is seen within the most common interval from 10 degrees to 30 degrees. Anteversion is between 23 degrees to 24 degrees when the ellipse bisects the total acetabular cross-section. This means that simply measuring the length of the short ellipse axis and the total length of the projected cross-section along the short axis provides the radiographic acetabular anteversion. Nonorthogonal projected radiographs should be corrected first.     

Anteversion of the acetabular cup. Measurement of angle after total hip replacement

We describe a new method for the accurate measurement of the angle of anteversion of an acetabular cup from standard anteroposterior radiographs, and provide the conversion tables required. The effect of the centering of the radiograph is discussed and a method of distinguishing between anteversion and retroversion by using a caudally directed x-ray beam is described.     

Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement

Malposition of the acetabular component during hip arthroplasty increases the occurrence of impingement, reduces range of motion, and increases the risk of dislocation and long-term wear. To prevent malpositioned hip implants, an increasing number of computer-assisted orthopaedic systems have been described, but their accuracy is not well established. The purpose of this study was to determine the reproducibility and accuracy of conventional versus computer-assisted techniques for positioning the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Using a lateral approach, 150 cups were placed by 10 surgeons in 10 identical plastic pelvis models (freehand, with a mechanical guide, using computer assistance). Conditions for cup implantations were made to mimic the operating room situation. Preoperative planning was done from a computed tomography scan. The accuracy of cup abduction and anteversion was assessed with an electromagnetic system. Freehand placement revealed a mean accuracy of cup anteversion and abduction of 10 degrees and 3.5 degrees, respectively (maximum error, 35 degrees). With the cup positioner, these angles measured 8 degrees and 4 degrees (maximum error, 29.8 degrees), respectively, and using computer assistance, 1.5 degrees and 2.5 degrees degrees (maximum error, 8 degrees), respectively. Computer-assisted cup placement was an accurate and reproducible technique for total hip arthroplasty. It was more accurate than traditional methods of cup positioning.     

Standardized fluoroscopy‐based technique to measure intraoperative cup anteversion

Direct anterior approach (DAA) with the patient lying supine has facilitated the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy and allows for standardized positioning of the patient. The current study presents a new technique to measure acetabular component anteversion using intraoperative fluoroscopy. The current paper describes a mathematical formula to calculate true acetabular component anteversion based on the acetabular component abduction angle and the c‐arm tilt angle (CaT). The CaT is determined by tilting the c‐arm until an external pelvic oblique radiograph with the equatorial plane of the acetabular component perpendicular to the fluoroscopy receptor is obtained. CaT is determined by direct reading on the C‐arm device. The technique was validated using a radiopaque synbone model comparing the described technique to computed tomography anteversion measurement. The experiment was repeated 25 times. The difference in anteversion between the two measuring techniques was on average 0.2° (range −3.0–3.1). The linear regression coefficients evaluating the agreement between the experimental and control methods were 0.99 (95%CI 0.88–1.10, p < 0.001) and 0.33 (95%CI −1.53–2.20, p = 0.713) for the slope and intercept, respectively. The current study confirms that the described three‐step c‐arm acetabular cup measuring technique can reproducibly and reliably assess acetabular component anteversion in the supine position, as compared to CT‐imaging. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:2307–2312, 2017.

     

Reliability of cup position in navigated THA in the lateral decubitus position using the 'flip technique'

Malpositioning of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty (THA) increases the risk of dislocation, reduces the range of motion and may contribute to bearing surface wear. During computer assisted navigation, the anterior pelvic plane is registered intraoperatively by percutaneous palpation, but this may be unreliable. The aim of our study was to evaluate the reliability of imageless navigation in acetabular positioning employing data acquisition in the supine position and surgery in the lateral position ('flip technique'). We report 24 patients affected by primary osteoarthritis undergoing THA in which implants were placed with a conventional free-hand technique using the acetabular transverse ligament for cup orientation. For imageless navigation we used Orthopilot-Aesculap software. All patients had a postoperative computed tomography (CT) scan at three months, using previously validated dedicated software for cup orientation. Data collected using navigation software were compared with CT measurements. The mean acetabular inclination and anteversion recorded intra-operatively using navigation software were respectively 41°5' (SD: 9.61) and 9°5' (SD: 4.01) respectively. The mean inclination and anteversion calculated post-operatively by the CT based image software were 44°2' (SD 5.83) and 14°4' (SD 6.42) respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the anteversion values (p=0.04). Therefore, the acquisition of parameters in the supine position with surgery performed in the lateral decubitus position creates unreliable data concerning cup anteversion using an imageless navigation system, and therefore the 'flip technique' cannot be recommended.     

Quantification and visualization of the influence of pelvic tilt upon measurement of acetabular inclination and anteversion

AIM: The indication of acetabular inclination and anteversion not only depends on definition but also on a correctly aligned patient. Determination of anteversion and inclination according to Sven-Johannsson and Visser were simulated with 3D calculations. The influence of pelvic tilt in relation to the frontal plane was evaluated and visualized. METHOD: With 3D calculations of planar X-ray photographs for artificial hip cups the normal vector of the acetabular cup was used to calculate anteversion and inclination. RESULTS: The main axis of the projected acetabular rim is equally suited to determine the cup orientation as the normal vector of the cup plane. Pelvic tilt of about 10 degrees causes measuring errors of about 8 degrees when measured with conventionally used techniques. CONCLUSION: For the correct determination of cup orientation pelvic tilt in relation to the frontal plane has to be accounted for.