低剂量新三联疗法根除血透患者幽门螺杆菌的疗效及安全性研究

目的研究以低剂量奥美拉唑为基本药物联合低剂量阿莫西林胶囊和克拉霉素片的7日新三联疗法治疗维持性血液透析患者幽门螺杆菌的疗效及安全性。方法选取22例合并幽门螺杆菌感染的血透患者为研究对象,同时选取30例各脏器功能正常的合并幽门螺杆菌患者为对照组,血透患者和对照组的服药剂量为：奥美拉唑胶囊20mg qd、阿莫西林胶囊500mg bid、克拉霉素片250mg qd,疗程均为1周,停药4周后通过组织学及碳呼气试验检测幽门螺杆菌的感染情况,比较两组的幽门螺杆菌根除率。结果血透患者幽门螺杆菌的清除率为81.8%,而非尿毒症患者为80%（P〉0.05）。所有研究对象均未发生严重的不良反应。结论低剂量新三联疗法对根除血透患者幽门螺杆菌是有效及安全的。     

Seven-day therapy for Helicobacter pylori in the United States

BACKGROUND: The ideal duration of Helicobacter pylori treatment in the United States and whether eradication therapy is as successful in nonulcer dyspepsia as in peptic ulcer disease are controversial topics. AIM: This study compared the efficacy of 3-, 7- and 10-day triple therapies with rabeprazole to a 10-day omeprazole control triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with and without peptic ulcer disease in the United States. METHODS: This was a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group trial. A total of 803 patients with H. pylori infection (determined by [13C]urea breath test and rapid urease test or culture) received either rabeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1000 mg b.d., and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 3, 7, or 10 days, or 10 days of omeprazole 20 mg b.d. with the same antibiotic regimen (control). H. pylori status was assessed by [13C]urea breath test > or =6 weeks after completing treatment. RESULTS: In intent-to-treat patients, the eradication percentages achieved for the rabeprazole-based treatments were: 3-day, 27% (95% confidence interval: 21%-34%); 7-day, 77% (95% confidence interval: 71%-83%); and 10-day, 78% (95% confidence interval: 72%-84%). The eradication percentage with the 10-day omeprazole-based treatment was 73% (95% confidence interval: 67%-79%). There was no statistically significant difference between the 7-day rabeprazole-based regimen and the 10-day rabeprazole- and omeprazole-based regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Seven-day therapy with rabeprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin is similar in efficacy to 10-day therapies and had similar efficacy in patients with and without ulcer disease.     

Safety and efficacy of 7-day rabeprazole- and omeprazole-based triple therapy regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with documented peptic ulcer disease

AIM: A double-blind, randomized study was designed to determine whether rabeprazole- and omeprazole-based triple therapy regimens are therapeutically equivalent in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-five patients with current or previously active peptic ulcer and a positive H. pylori urease test were randomly assigned to receive RCA, OCA, RCM or OCM twice daily for 7 days (R, rabeprazole 20 mg; O, omeprazole 20 mg; C, clarithromycin 500 mg; A, amoxicillin 1000 mg; M, metronidazole 400 mg). H. pylori eradication was documented by negative 13C-urea breath tests at 4 and 12 weeks, and was evaluated using a 2 x 2 factorial design with proton pump inhibitor and antibiotic as factors. RESULTS: Overall eradication rates (per protocol/intention-to-treat) were 87%/77% and 85%/75% with rabeprazole and omeprazole, respectively (not significant). However, a statistical interaction between proton pump inhibitor and antibiotic was identified. RCA produced a somewhat higher eradication rate than OCA (94% vs. 84%; difference, 9.8%; 95% confidence interval, - 0.7% to + 20.4%), whereas RCM produced a lower eradication rate than OCM (79% vs. 86%; difference, 8.1%; 95% confidence interval, - 21.4% to + 5.1%). Ulcer healing rates were > 90% with H. pylori eradication. Each regimen was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Rabeprazole- and omeprazole-based triple therapy regimens are therapeutically equivalent in the eradication of H. pylori and well tolerated. The statistical interaction observed between the proton pump inhibitor and supplementary antibiotic may be due to chance.     

雷贝拉唑三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌感染相关性胃溃疡的疗效观察

目的观察雷贝拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌（Hp）感染相关性胃溃疡的有效性和安全性。方法100例Hp感染相关性胃溃疡患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,治疗组采用雷贝拉唑10mg、2次／d,阿莫西林1．0g、2次／d,克拉霉素500mg、2次／d治疗;对照组采用奥美拉唑20mg、2次／d,阿莫西林1．0g、2次／d,克拉霉素500mg,2次／d治疗。两组疗程均为7d。观察两组临床疗效及Hp根除情况。结果治疗组临床症状疗效总有效率96．0％、溃疡愈合率88．0％、胃镜疗效总有效率94．0％、Hp清除率92．0％、Hp根除率为90．0％,均高于对照组,但两组差异均无统计学意义（均P〉0．05）;两组均未发生严重不良反应。结论雷贝拉唑三联疗法治疗Hp感染相关性胃溃疡有较高的临床效果,且不良反应少。     

雷贝拉唑与奥美拉唑三联疗法治疗消化性溃疡疗效比较

目的比较雷贝拉唑三联疗法与奥美拉唑三联疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori,Hp)阳性消化性溃疡的疗效。方法80例经胃镜检查确诊为消化性溃疡并经快速尿素酶实验和病理学检查确定为Hp阳性的患者随机分为两组。观察组40例:口服雷贝拉唑10 mg,克拉霉素0.5 g,阿莫西林1 g,2次/d,治疗1周后单独服用雷贝拉唑10 mg,1次/d,连续1周。对照组40例:口服奥美拉唑20 mg,克拉霉素0.5 g,阿莫西林1 g,2次/d,治疗1周后单独服用奥美拉唑20 mg,1次/d,治疗1周,疗程结束后4周复查胃镜并检测Hp,并记录用药后患者症状的改变程度。结果观察组4周溃疡愈合率为95%,对照组为77.5%,观察组明显高于对照组,两组差异有显著意义(P<0.05);观察组Hp根除率为87.5%,对照组为75%,两组间差异无显著意义(P>0.05);雷贝拉唑组第1、3天症状缓解率分别为82.5%、92.5%,奥美拉唑组为62.5%、72.5%,两组比较差异有显著意义(P<0.05)。结论两组方案均能有效治疗消化性溃疡和缓解临床症状,并能有效地根除幽门螺杆菌。但雷贝拉唑三联疗法在快速改善临床症状和促进溃疡愈合方面优于奥美...     

Five-day proton pump inhibitor-based quadruple therapy regimen is more effective than 7-day triple therapy regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: There have been no reports that describe whether 5-day quadruple therapy (rabeprazole + amoxicillin + clarithromycin + metronidazole; RACM) could substitute for standard 7-day triple therapy as a first-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a randomized prospective single centre study. A total of 160 H. pylori-positive patients who had not received therapy were given either a 5-day RACM regimen (n=80, rabeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxicillin 750 mg b.d., clarithromycin 200 mg b.d. and metronidazole 250 mg b.d.) or a 7-day RAC regimen (n=80, rabeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxicillin 750 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 200 mg b.d.). Cure of the infection was assessed by a (13)C urea breath test 1 month after the completion of therapy. RESULTS: The eradication rates of the 5-day RACM regimen and the 7-day RAC regimen were 93% (95% CI: 84--97%) and 81% (95% CI: 71--89%) by intention-to-treat analysis, 94% (95% CI: 86--98%) and 83% (95% CI: 73--91%) by all-patients-treated analysis analysis and 95% (95% CI: 87--98%; P < 0.05) and 82% (95% CI: 72--90%) by per protocol analysis, respectively. No serious adverse effect was observed, and 99% of the patients reported complete compliance. CONCLUSIONS: The cure rate of the 5-day RACM regimen was more effective than the 7-day RAC regimen, suggesting that this regimen could be preferable as a first-line therapy for H. pylori infection.     

High eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori with a new sequential treatment

BACKGROUND: Eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori with standard triple therapy are disappointing, and studies from several countries confirm this poor performance. AIM: To assess the eradication rate of a new sequential treatment regimen compared with conventional triple therapy for the eradication of H. pylori infection. METHODS: One thousand and forty-nine dyspeptic patients were studied prospectively. H. pylori-infected patients were randomized to receive 10-day sequential therapy [rabeprazole (40 mg daily) plus amoxicillin (1 g twice daily) for the first 5 days, followed by rabeprazole (20 mg), clarithromycin (500 mg) and tinidazole (500 mg) twice daily for the remaining 5 days] or standard 7-day therapy [corrected] [rabeprazole (20 mg), clarithromycin (500 mg) and amoxicillin (1 g) twice daily]. H. pylori status was assessed by histology, rapid urease test and 13C-urea breath test at baseline and 6 weeks or more after completion of treatment. RESULTS: Higher eradication rates were found with the sequential regimen compared to the standard regimen (intention-to-treat: 92% vs. 74%, P < 0.0001; per protocol: 95% vs. 77%, P < 0.0001). Higher eradication rates were also seen in patients with peptic ulcer disease and non-ulcer dyspepsia. In both treatments, compliance was similar (> 90%), as was the rate of side-effects, which were mild. CONCLUSIONS: This 10-day sequential treatment regimen achieves high eradication rates in peptic ulcer disease and non-ulcer dyspepsia.     

Efficacy of low-dose clarithromycin triple therapy and tinidazole-containing triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies are recommended as the first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication. AIM: To evaluate the efficacies of low-dose clarithromycin triple therapy and tinidazole-containing triple therapy in a metronidazole resistance prevalent area and to compare the efficacies with standard triple therapy. METHODS: In a randomized, multicentre, prospective study, a total of 352 patients with duodenal ulcer or non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomly divided into three groups according to the administered regimen: OAC250 group (omeprazole, 20 mg, amoxicillin, 1000 mg, and clarithromycin, 250 mg), OAC500 group (omeprazole, 20 mg, amoxicillin, 1000 mg, and clarithromycin, 500 mg) and OTC group (omeprazole, 20 mg, tinidazole, 500 mg, and clarithromycin, 500 mg). The three groups received each regimen twice daily for 7 days. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed before and 4 weeks after treatment. H. pylori status was determined by rapid urease test and 13C urea breath test. RESULTS: The eradication rates in the OAC250, OAC500 and OTC groups were 76.2%, 65.7% and 64.8% (95% confidence interval: 67.9-84.4%, 56.7-74.8% and 55.7-73.9%), respectively, by intention-to-treat analysis (P=0.149) and 92.8%, 87.2% and 84.1% (95% confidence interval: 84.4-97.3%, 77.9-93.8% and 73.9-91.2%), respectively, by per protocol analysis (P=0.088). All regimens were well tolerated and compliance was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Both low-dose clarithromycin triple therapy and tinidazole-containing triple therapy are effective and safe regimens for H. pylori eradication.     

雷贝拉唑、阿莫西林、加替沙星三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效及安全性

目的:评价由加替沙星(400 mg,qd),雷贝拉唑(20 mg,bid),阿莫西林(1 g,bid),疗程7 d的三联方案根除治疗幽门螺杆菌的疗效及安全性。方法:48名幽门螺杆菌感染的患者参与本次研究,受试者均有一次或一次以上含克拉霉素的常规三联治疗史。治疗后四周通过14 C-呼气试验判定根除治疗效果。根除治疗失败的患者通过体外抑菌试验判断幽门螺杆菌对阿莫西林,克拉霉素及加替沙星的药物敏感性。结果:41名患者根除治疗成功[完成治疗分析(PP)和意向治疗分析(ITT)均为85.4%,95%CI:74%～95%]无显著副作用。体外药敏试验显示在7名治疗失败的患者中未出现对加替沙星和阿莫西林的继发耐药。结论:由加替沙星、阿莫西林和雷贝拉唑组成的7 d短程治疗方案,作为根除治疗失败后的补救治疗方案简单有效,耐受性好,依从性高;而且此方案失败后未引起继发耐药性。     

High rate of Helicobacter pylori eradication with sequential therapy in elderly patients with peptic ulcer: a prospective controlled study

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates with triple therapies are decreasing, and few data in elderly patients are available. A 10-day sequential regimen succeeded in curing such H. pylori infection in unselected patients. AIM: To compare this sequential regimen and the standard triple therapy for H. pylori eradication in geriatric patients with peptic ulcer. METHODS: Overall, 179 H. pylori-infected patients with peptic ulcer were enrolled (mean age: 69.5 years; range: 65-83). Patients were randomized to 10-day sequential therapy (rabeprazole 20 mg b.d. plus amoxicillin 1 g b.d. for the first 5 days, followed by rabeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and tinidazole 500 mg, all b.d., for the remaining 5 days) or standard 7-day triple regimen (rabeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxicillin 1 g, all b.d.). Helicobacter pylori status was assessed by histology and rapid urease test at baseline and 4-6 weeks after completion of treatment. RESULTS: The sequential regimen achieved eradication rates significantly higher in comparison with the standard regimen at both intention-to-treat (94% vs. 80%; P = 0.008) and per-protocol (97% vs. 83%; P = 0.006) analyses. In both treatment groups, compliance to the therapy was high (> 95%), and the rate of mild side-effects was similarly low (< 12%). At repeated upper endoscopy, peptic ulcer lesions were healed in 97% patients, without a statistically significant difference between the sequential regimen and the standard triple therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In elderly patients with peptic ulcer disease, the 10-day sequential treatment regimen achieved significantly higher eradication rates in comparison with standard triple therapy.     

Levofloxacin-based triple therapy vs. quadruple therapy in second-line Helicobacter pylori treatment: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Levofloxacin has been shown to be effective in Helicobacter pylori eradication. Two 10-day levofloxacin-based triple therapies were compared with standard 7- and 14-day quadruple regimens in second-line treatment. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty consecutive patients who failed to respond to standard triple therapy (clarithromycin, amoxicillin, rabeprazole) were randomly assigned to four groups: (1) levofloxacin 500 mg o.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d., rabeprazole 20 mg b.d. for 10 days (LAR, n = 70); (2) levofloxacin 500 mg o.d., tinidazole 500 mg b.d., rabeprazole 20 mg b.d. for 10 days (LTR, n = 70); (3) tetracycline 500 mg q.d.s., metronidazole 500 mg t.d.s., bismuth salt 120 mg q.d.s., rabeprazole 20 mg b.d. for 7 days (7TMBR, n = 70); and (4) for 14 days (14TMBR, n = 70). Helicobacter pylori status and side-effects were assessed 6 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: The eradication rate was 94% in the LAR group and 90% in the LTR group in both intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses. Helicobacter pylori eradication was achieved in 63 and 69% of the 7TMBR group and in 69 and 80% of the 14TMBR group in intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, respectively. Side-effects were significantly lower in the LAR and LTR groups than in the 14TMBR group. CONCLUSION: Ten-day levofloxacin-based therapies are better than standard quadruple regimens as second-line option for H. pylori eradication.     

含铋剂序贯疗法治疗幽门螺杆菌感染的疗效观察

目的:评价10 d含铋剂序贯疗法与常规序贯疗法及四联疗法对初次根除幽门螺杆菌(H.pylori)失败后补救治疗的疗效。方法:经胃镜下快速尿素酶试验或14C-尿素呼气试验确诊为H.pylori阳性的患者,用标准一线治疗方案进行H.pylori根除治疗,停药4周后行14C-尿素呼气试验,结果仍为阳性者判定为H.pylori根除失败。将初次根除失败的患者随机分为3组,A组:前5 d,雷贝拉唑10 mg、阿莫西林1 g、果胶铋300 mg;后5 d,雷贝拉唑10 mg、克拉霉素0.5 g、奥硝唑0.5 g、果胶铋300 mg。B组:前5 d,雷贝拉唑10 mg、阿莫西林1 g;后5 d,雷贝拉唑10 mg、克拉霉素0.5 g、奥硝唑0.5 g。C组:雷贝拉唑10 mg、果胶铋300 mg、阿莫西林1 g、呋喃唑酮0.1 g,疗程10 d,所有药物均口服,bid。治疗结束4周后复查14C-尿素呼气试验。结果:采用按意向性治疗(intention-to-treat,ITT)分析和按符合方案(per protocol,PP)分析对H.pylori根除率进行评价。A、B、C 3组H.pylori ITT根除率分别为92.3%、74.4%、75.0%,PP根除率分别为94.7%、78.4%、78.9%,2种分析方法均显示A组H.pylori根除率明显高于B、C 2组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而B组与C组间根除率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组和B组不良反应发生率(5.3%、5.4%)低于C组(21.1%),但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:10 d含铋剂序贯疗法可作为H.pylori一线根除治疗失败后安全有效的补救治疗方案。     

Lansoprazole, levofloxacin and amoxicillin triple therapy vs. quadruple therapy as second-line treatment of resistant Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To test the efficacy of levofloxacin-based second-line therapy for resistant Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: One hundred and six patients who failed H. pylori eradication were randomized to receive (i) lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, levofloxacin 500 mg, all given twice daily for 7 days (LAL); or (ii) lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, metronidazole 400 mg thrice daily, bismuth subcitrate 120 mg and tetracycline 500 mg four times daily for 7 days (quadruple). Post-treatment H. pylori status was determined by (13)C-urea breath test. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat and per-protocol H. pylori eradication rates were 57/60% for the LAL group and 71/76% for the quadruple group respectively. Metronidazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin and levofloxacin resistance were found in 76%, 71%, 0% and 18% of patients, respectively. Levofloxacin resistance led to treatment failure in the LAL group. For patients with dual resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin, the eradication rates were 79% in the LAL group (levofloxacin-sensitive) and 65% in the quadruple group (P=0.34). CONCLUSION: Lansoprazole, amoxicillin plus levofloxacin second-line therapy is comparable with quadruple therapy in efficacy. Subjects, especially those with dual resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin, may consider levofloxacin-based therapy for levofloxacin-sensitive strains.     

One-week ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Hong Kong with high prevalence of metronidazole resistance

AIM: To compare 1-week ranitidine bismuth citrate-based (RBC) triple therapy vs. omeprazole-based (O) triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in Hong Kong with high prevalence of metronidazole resistance. METHODS: Patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive either: (i) RBCCM: ranitidine bismuth citrate (pylorid) 400 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and metronidazole 400 mg; or (ii) OCM: omeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and metronidazole 400 mg, each given twice daily for 1 week. Endoscopy (CLO test, histology and culture) and 13C-urea breath test were performed before randomization and 6 weeks after drug treatment. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients were randomized. H. pylori eradication rates (intention-to-treat, n=180/per protocol, n=166) were 83%/92% for RBCCM and 66%/70% for OCM (P=0.01, intention-to-treat and P=0.001, per protocol, respectively). RBCCM treatment was unaffected by metronidazole susceptibility and achieved a significantly higher eradication rate in metronidazole-resistant cases (89%) than the OCM group (45%, P=0.0064). CONCLUSION: One-week ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy is significantly better than omeprazole-based triple therapy for the eradication of H. pylori infection, especially in metronidazole-resistant cases. It is an effective regimen for the eradication of H. pylori infection in regions with a high prevalence of metronidazole resistance.     

Rabeprazole-based eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori: a large-scale study in Japan

BACKGROUND: Large-scale studies of rabeprazole-based Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy have not been reported in Japan. AIMS: To evaluate H. pylori eradication by rabeprazole-based therapy with reference to antibiotic susceptibility, CYP2C19 genotype, and rabeprazole and clarithromycin dosages. METHODS: From 35 centres 479 H. pylori-positive patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer were randomized to four treatment groups: Group 1 (10 mg rabeprazole + 750 mg amoxicillin + 200 mg clarithromycin twice daily for 7 days); Group 2 (10 mg, 750 mg, 400 mg); Group 3 (20 mg, 750 mg, 200 mg) and Group 4 (20 mg, 750 mg, 400 mg). RESULTS: Eradication rates were 86% (102 of 119), 89% (97 of 109), 91% (106 of 116) and 90% (104 of 115) for Groups 1-4, respectively. The eradication rate was 95% (360 of 379) for clarithromycin-susceptible strains, and 50% (30 of 60) for clarithromycin-resistant strains. The eradication rates were 88% (332 of 379) and 96% (77 of 80) in extensive metabolizers and poor metabolizers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Rabeprazole-based therapies achieved 50% eradication of clarithromycin-resistant H. pylori, and even achieved good rates in extensive metabolizers. Accordingly, rabeprazole can be recommended as part of a first-line proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy for H. pylori.     

Triple therapy with clarithromycin, omeprazole, and amoxicillin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori in duodenal ulcer patients in Asia and Africa

BACKGROUND: Studies assessing the efficacy of triple therapy containing clarithromycin and amoxicillin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection and healing of duodenal ulcers in Asian and African countries are limited. AIM: To determine the efficacy and safety of 1-week triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin for eradicating H. pylori infection in patients with active duodenal ulcer living in Asian and African regions. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicentre study in 11 centres in Asia and Africa. Patients with endoscopy-proven duodenal ulcer and who were H. pylori-positive were treated with clarithromycin 500 mg, omeprazole 20 mg, and amoxicillin 1000 mg, all given twice daily for 7 days. Upper endoscopy was repeated at week 6 to check for ulcer healing and H. pylori status. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were recruited. H. pylori eradication rates were 85% by per protocol analysis and 80% by intention-to-treat analysis. Ulcer healing was found in 94% of subjects (per protocol analysis). Clinical success, measured by change of pre-treatment ulcer symptoms, was strongly supported by complete resolution or improvement in 100% of the evaluable patients (per protocol analysis). Since treatment-related adverse events, when present, were largely mild or moderate, the triple therapy regimen was considered safe. CONCLUSION: Seven-day triple therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin was efficacious for treating Asian and African patients with duodenal ulcer disease associated with H. pylori infection, and the treatment regimen was well-tolerated.     

Randomised clinical trial: the efficacy of a 10-day sequential therapy vs. a 14-day standard proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori in Korea

Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 34: 1098–1105

Summary

Background The eradication rates of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) using a proton pump inhibitor (PPI)‐based triple therapy have declined due to antibiotic resistance worldwide. Aim To compare the eradication rate of the 10‐day sequential therapy for H. pylori infection with that of the 14‐day standard PPI‐based triple therapy. Methods This was a prospective, randomised, controlled study. A total of 409 patients with H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to receive either the 10‐day sequential therapy regimen, which consisted of pantoprazole (40 mg) plus amoxicillin (1000 mg) twice a day for 5 days, then pantoprazole (40 mg) with clarithromycin (500 mg) and metronidazole (500 mg) twice a day for another five consecutive days or the 14‐day PPI‐based triple therapy regimen, which consisted of pantoprazole (40 mg) with amoxicillin (1000 mg) and clarithromycin (500 mg) twice a day for 14 days. The pre‐ and post‐treatment H. pylori status were assessed by rapid urease test, urea breath test, or histology. Successful eradication was confirmed at least 4 weeks after finishing the treatment. Results In the intention‐to‐treat analysis, the eradication rates of the 10‐day sequential therapy and of the 14‐day PPI‐based triple therapy were 85.9% (176/205) and 75.0% (153/205), respectively (P = 0.006). In the per‐protocol analysis, the eradication rates were 92.6% (175/205) and 85% (153/204), respectively (P = 0.019). There was no statistically significant difference between the two investigated groups regarding the occurrence of adverse event rates (18.9% vs. 13.3%, P = 0.143). Conclusion The 10‐day sequential therapy achieved significantly higher eradication rates than the 14‐day standard PPI‐based triple therapy in Korea.     

Randomized controlled study of rabeprazole,levofloxacin and rifabutin triple therapy vs. quadruple therapy as second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To test the efficacy of rabeprazole, levofloxacin and rifabutin triple therapy vs. quadruple therapy for the second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: One hundred and nine patients who had failed previous H. pylori eradication were randomized to receive: (i) rabeprazole, 20 mg b.d., rifabutin, 300 mg once daily, and levofloxacin, 500 mg once daily, for 7 days (triple therapy); or (ii) rabeprazole, 20 mg b.d., metronidazole, 400 mg t.d.s., bismuth subcitrate, 120 mg q.d.s., and tetracycline, 500 mg q.d.s., for 7 days (quadruple therapy). Endoscopy and culture were performed before treatment. RESULTS: The clarithromycin (79% vs. 21%, P < 0.001) and metronidazole (89% vs. 40%, P < 0.001) resistance rates were significantly higher in patients with previous exposure than in those with no previous exposure. The intention-to-treat and per protocol eradication rates were 91%/91% for the triple therapy group and 91%/92% for the quadruple therapy group. For patients with double resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin, the eradication rates were 85% (17/20) in the triple therapy group and 87% (13/15) in the quadruple therapy group. Compliance was greater than 95% for both regimens. CONCLUSION: Rabeprazole, levofloxacin and rifabutin-based triple therapy and quadruple therapy were equally effective as second-line treatments for H. pylori infection.     

Low-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus metronidazole vs. full-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus amoxicillin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the efficacy and tolerability of two 1-week triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive lansoprazole 30 mg once daily, clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily (LCM group), or lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, and amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily (LCA group). H. pylori status was assessed by rapid urease test, histology and 13C-urea breath test before and after therapy. RESULTS: At 3 months, H. pylori eradication (intention- to-treat/per protocol analysis) was 92.4%/93.8% in the LCM group and 83.1%/85.7% in the LCA group (P=N.S.). Side-effects were more frequently reported in the LCA group (37.9%) than in the LCM group (19.7%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this open, randomized controlled trial, eradication of H. pylori by low-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus metronidazole was higher with significantly less side-effects than by full-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. This finding may be related to the stronger synergism of clarithromycin plus metronidazole, even at lower doses, than of clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. Considering the lower cost as well, LCM should be preferred to LCA in the eradication of H. pylori.     

Low and high doses of rabeprazole vs. omeprazole for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Low-dose rabeprazole-based triple therapy was effective for Helicobacter pylori eradication in a few Japanese studies. AIM: To compare the effectiveness of 1-week low-dose and high-dose rabeprazole-based triple therapy with those of omeprazole. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-two H. pylori-infected dyspeptic patients were randomized to receive twice daily for 1 week either rabeprazole 10 mg (R10), rabeprazole 20 mg (R20) or omeprazole 20 mg (O) in combination with amoxicillin 1,000 mg (A) and clarithromycin 500 mg (C). H. pylori status assessment was by the CLO test and histology at entry and by the 13C-urea breath test at 4-6 weeks after cessation of therapy. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication rates in intention-to-treat groups were 85%, 96% and 83% for R10AC, R20AC and OAC, respectively. Eradication rates in per protocol groups were 86%, 96% and 90% for R10AC, R20AC and OAC, respectively. On an intention-to-treat analysis, the R20AC group had a significantly higher eradication rate than did R10AC or OAC (P < 0.05). However, the higher eradication rate with R20AC did not reach statistical significance in the per protocol analysis. Drug intolerance was found in three OAC patients. CONCLUSION: High-dose rabeprazole-based triple therapy is more effective than its low-dose equivalent or omeprazole in eradicating H. pylori infection.