Oral low-dose dexamethasone for androgen-independent prostate cancer patients

We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of oral low-dose dexamethasone (DXM) therapy for androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). Between January 1999 and April 2006, 99 consecutive patients with AIPC were enrolled in this study. The median patient age was 70 years (range 46-86), and the median pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 243 ng/ml (range 8.2-29600). Median follow-up was 41.9 months (range 11.4-170.4). Upon biochemical failure, patients were treated with oral low-dose DXM. A total of 40 of the 99 cases (40.4%) showed a ≥50% decrease in serum PSA levels (PSA responders). Twenty-five cases (25.2%) showed a <50% decrease in PSA, and the remaining 34 cases (34.3%) had increased PSA levels (PSA non-responders). The median PSA progression-free survival was 3.0 (range 0-27) and 8.0 months (range 2-27) for the entire cohort and PSA responders, respectively. The PSA responders had a significantly increased survival (median 30.1 months) compared to the non-responders (median 8.8 months, P<0.001). Of the 34 patients who were under pain control for bone metastases before the administration of DXM, 23 (67.6%) were able to discontinue the regular use of analgesics. The PSA responders also showed an increase in hemoglobin levels. The change in serum interleukin-6 levels was significantly associated with a response to DXM (P=0.0065). Severe adverse events of DXM were rare. Clinicopathological factors predicting the PSA response to DXM were age, time from initial androgen deprivation therapy to DXM and PSA velocity prior to DXM. In conclusion, oral low-dose DXM led to an acceptable PSA response in patients with AIPC. Thus, this therapy may be an effective and safe alternative for the treatment of AIPC, particularly for patients who are not favourable candidates for chemotherapy.     

Progress in oral anti-cancer drug therapy for urological cancer

We describe the progress in oral anti-cancer drug therapy for urological cancer. Pure antiandrogen (e.g., flutamide) is widely used as a means of maximal androgen blockade (MAB) in the treatment of prostate cancer. However, all series reported in the past several years did not show positive effects on prolongation of the patient's survival. Evaluations by meta-analysis are in progress. As the mechanism of antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome has been recognized, it was widely accepted that antiandrogen should be discontinued when disease progression or PSA elevation becomes evident. Estramustine was recently clarified as an effective therapeutic agent in the treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer in combination with oral etoposide. Oral etoposide therapy has been tried as a maintenance or a palliative chemotherapy for non-curative or high-risk germ cell tumor. UFT (a compound of tegafur and uracil) is said to be effective for bladder cancer. It has been also suggested that UFT was partly effective as a means of first-line endocrine chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer and was a promising agent in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma in combination with Interferon-alpha. Usually the age of the patient with urological malignancy, excluding testicular cancer, is high and complicated. For such patients, an aggressive intravenous chemotherapy can not always be used. Therefore, a less aggressive, less toxic chemotherapy with oral drug is often planned to maintain QOL.     

Chemo-endocrine therapy with low-dose cisplatin, UFT, and dexamethasone for hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients

Since September 2005, twenty-two patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (aged 55-81 years) were treated with LH-RH agonist and low-dose cisplatin, UFT, and dexamethasone after proving resistant to estramustine phosphate therapy. The regimen of this therapy consists of 5 mg/body of cisplatin intravenously once a week, 300 mg/day of UFT and 1 mg/day of dexamethasone orally, every day. All patients suffered from clinical progression such as local recurrence in 11 patients who had already received radiation therapy, lymph node metastasis in 7 patients, and bone metastasis in 15 patients. Initial PSA value ranged from 1.7 ng/mL to 215.1 ng/mL. The PSA response rate, which decreased more than 50% in PSA values was 72. 7% (16/22). The follow-up term ranged from 2 to 43 months, and nine patients died of cancer progression. The median time to progression was 11 months, and median overall survival was 19 months. There were no severe adverse effects, and stoppages of the therapy for 13 patients were all due to disease progression. Following this therapy, 9 patients received best supportive care and 4 patients received docetaxel chemotherapy. We considered this therapy to be effective for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer because it maintained their good QOL.     

Primary treatment for stage D2 prostate cancer: a randomized study of combined androgen blockade alone versus combined with UFT]

To evaluate the efficacy of chemoendocrine therapy for the initial treatment of stage D2 prostate cancer, we conducted a prospective randomized study which compared combined androgen blockade alone to that combined with UFT. Twenty-one patients received LH-RH agonist and flutamide (Group-A), and 23 patients received LH-RH agonist, flutamide and UFT (Group-B). The overall response rate and the PSA response rate of Group-A was 71.4% and 100% respectively, against 65.2% and 90%, respectively in Group-B. The median follow-up period was 24 months. The 2-year progression-free survival rate of Group-A was 7.4% and that of Group-B was 15.9%. The response rate and progression-free survival rate did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Liver dysfunction due to flutamide was common in both groups, and a total of 4 patients did not continue the treatment because of this adverse effect. We conclude that in patients with stage D2 prostate cancer, treatment with combined androgen blockade and UFT is not superior to treatment with combined androgen blockade alone.     

Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer

Based on the results of combined data from three North American Phase II studies, a randomised Phase II study in the same patient population was performed, using combination chemotherapy with estramustine phosphate (EMP) and vinblastine (VBL) in hormone refractory prostate cancer patients. In all, 92 patients were randomised into a Phase II study of oral EMP (10 mg kg day continuously) or oral EMP in combination with intravenous VBL (4 mg m(2) week for 6 weeks, followed by 2 weeks rest). The end points were toxicity and PSA response in both groups, with the option to continue the trial as a Phase III study with time to progression and survival as end points, if sufficient responses were observed. Toxicity was unexpectedly high in both treatment arms and led to treatment withdrawal or refusal in 49% of all patients, predominantly already during the first treatment cycle. The mean treatment duration was 10 and 14 weeks, median time to PSA progression was 27.2 and 30.8 weeks, median survival time was 44 and 50.9 weeks, and PSA response rate was only 24.6 and 28.9% in the EMP/VBL and EMP arms, respectively. There was no correlation between PSA response and survival. While the PSA response in the patients tested was less than half that recorded in the North American studies, the toxicity of EMP monotherapy or in combination with VBL was much higher than expected. Further research on more effective and less toxic treatment strategies for hormone refractory prostate cancer is mandatory.     

Chlorambucil and lomustine (CL56) in absolute hormone refractory prostate cancer: re-induction of endocrine sensitivity an unexpected finding

The management of androgen independent prostate cancer is increasingly disputed. Diethylstilbestrol and steroids have useful second-line activity in its management. The value of chemotherapy still remains contentious. This paper reports a phase 2 study of two orally active chemotherapy drugs in patients who are absolutely hormone refractory having failed primary androgen blockade and combined oestrogens and corticosteroids. In total, 37 patients who were biochemically castrate with absolute hormone refractory prostate cancer and performance status of 0-3 were enrolled. Therapy consisted of chlorambucil 1 mg kg(-1) given as 6 mg a day until the total dose was reached and lomustine 2 mg kg(-1) given every 56 days (CL56). During this time all hormone therapy was stopped. One patient normalised his PSA with a further two having a greater than 50% decline leading to an objective response rate of 10%. The median time to progression was 3.6 months with an overall survival of 7.1 months. The median survival of this group of patients from first becoming androgen independent was 23.5 months. Eight of 17 (47%) patients who were subsequently re-challenged with hormonal therapy following failure of chemotherapy had a further PSA reduction, three (17%) of which were >50%. The median progression-free interval for the eight patients was 4 months. In conclusion, CL56 has a low objective response rate in the management of absolute hormone refractory prostate cancer. Toxicity was mild. Re-induction of hormone sensitivity following failure of chemotherapy was an unexpected finding that requires further study.     

Phase II trial of oral uracil/tegafur plus leucovorin in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The current study evaluated the efficacy of oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with hormone-refractory metastatic carcinoma of the prostate who had undergone antiandrogen withdrawal and no more than 1 prior chemotherapy treatment were enrolled on a single-institution Phase II trial. Patients were treated with oral UFT at a dose of 300 mg/m2/d and oral LV at a dose of 90 mg/day for 28 days followed by 7 days off therapy on a 35-day cycle regimen. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. There was no response by objective criteria in 9 patients with measurable disease. Four responses by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) criteria (i.e., PSA decrease by > 50%) were noted (15%) lasting a mean of 20.5 weeks. Therapy was generally well tolerated, with 2 patients developing Grade 4 toxicity (1 patient each with diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome) and 4 patients having significant Grade 3 toxicity (anemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and vomiting) (Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). Six patients had stable disease by clinical, laboratory, and radiologic criteria for an average of 5 cycles of treatment (25 wks). CONCLUSIONS: Although UFT and LV are generally well tolerated in the setting of hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma, the combination has a low level of activity. Its toxicity and activity is similar to that observed when intravenous 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine are given alone. It may be an option for further investigations in combination regimens.     

A case of hormone/docetaxel-refractory prostate cancer in which PSA level decreased after docetaxel+zoledronic acid treatment

The patient was a 63-year-old man who had a recurrence and bone metastasis of prostate cancer after total prostatectomy. He was diagnosed with prostate cancer refractory to hormones. Subsequently, the PSA level decreased after docetaxel therapy, but then gradually increased. Thus, he was diagnosed with bone metastasis of prostate cancer refractory to therapy with hormones or docetaxel. The PSA level decreased after the start of therapy with docetaxel+ zoledronic acid. Zoledronic acid seems to be effective not only for the prevention but also for the treatment of skeletal related events(SRE)in patients with prostate cancer with bone metastases.     

Oral combination of cyclophosphamide, uracil plus tegafur and estramustine for hormone-refractory prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of an oral combination of cyclophosphamide, uracil plus tegafur (UFT) and estramustine in the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: Twenty-one patients were treated with oral administration of cyclophosphamide (100 mg/day), UFT (400 mg/day) and estramustine phosphate (560 mg/day). The median age of the patients was 70 years. Twelve patients had symptomatic bone metastasis, 6 had asymptomatic bone metastasis, 5 had lymph node metastasis, while 2 had only biochemical progression evaluated by prostate-specific antigen (PSA). RESULTS: Twelve (57%) out of 21 patients showed a PSA decline of 50% or greater. The median response duration was 7 months (range 2-15 months). Among the 20 patients assessable for bone pain, 2 (10%) improved, 12 (60%) remained stable and 6 (30%) progressed. Among the 10 patients assessable for bone metastasis, 1 (10%) improved, 5 (50%) were stable and 4 (40%) progressed on bone scan. Among 3 patients assessable for measurable disease (lymph node metastasis), 2 (67%) showed partial response and 1 (33%) progression. Most toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cyclophosphamide, UFT and estramustine is an active and well-tolerated regimen for HRPC. To evaluate the survival benefit, further randomized studies are required.     

健择加顺铂全身化疗治疗激素非依赖性晚期前列腺癌的近期疗效

背景与目的:迄今为止,临床上仍需探索有效的治疗措施治疗激素非依赖性晚期前列腺癌。本研究拟探讨健择加顺铂治疗激素非依赖性晚期前列腺癌的临床效果及不良反应。方法:15例激素非依赖性晚期前列腺癌患者,全部经手术去势及不同程度的抗雄激素药物治疗后病情缓解,之后病情再进展,经全身骨扫描证实12例有多发性骨转移灶,其中并有肝脏、双侧肾上腺和颅内转移各1例,血PSA进行性升高。用健择1000mg/m2加生理盐水(NS)100ml静脉滴注,第1、8天各一秦自科,等.健择加顺铂全身化疗治次;DDP100mg/m2加NS500ml静脉滴注第1天,或者DDP30mg+NS250ml静脉滴注第1～5天;每28天为一个疗程。结果:10例患者的血PSA值降至正常水平(<4ng/L),4例PSA值下降超过50%,1例PSA值变化不明显。化疗前12例有骨转移灶疼痛(按VRS分级Ⅰ级4例、Ⅱ级5例、Ⅲ级3例),化疗后9例疼痛消失,另3例仍有疼痛(Ⅰ级2例、Ⅱ级1例)。多发性颅内转移灶中最大转移瘤直径由化疗前的3.0cm缩小至0.5cm,化疗后面瘫症状消失。肝脏转移瘤由原先的10.2cm缩小至3.3cm。双侧肾上腺多发性转移瘤化疗后总的肿瘤体积缩小1/3以上。随访3～29个月,平均15.2个月,2例患者死亡,中位生存期14.7个月。平均疼痛缓解期为13.6个月。PSA值降低的平均稳定期为12.3个月。本组病例最常见     

The AKT inhibitor perifosine in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: a phase II California/Pittsburgh cancer consortium trial

BACKGROUND: Perifosine is an oral alkylphospholipid that inhibits cancer cell growth through decreased Akt phosphorylation. We conducted a phase II trial of perifosine in patients with biochemically recurrent, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed prostate cancer, previous prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy, and rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) without radiographic evidence of metastasis. Previous androgen deprivation therapy < 9 months in duration (completed >or= 1 year before registration) was allowed. The primary endpoint was PSA response, defined as a decrease by >or= 50% from the pretreatment value. Treatment was composed of a loading dose of perifosine 900 mg orally on day 1, then 100 mg daily starting 24 hours later. RESULTS: Of 25 patients, 24 were evaluable for response. After a median follow-up of 8 months, 5 patients (20%) had a reduction in serum PSA levels, but none met criteria for PSA response. Three patients immediately progressed with no response to therapy. Median progression-free survival was 6.64 months (range, 4.53-12.81 months). No change in the PSA doubling time (7 months) was observed before and after treatment initiation. Dose-limiting toxicities (all grade 3) included hyponatremia, arthritis, hyperuricemia, and photophobia. CONCLUSION: Although well tolerated, perifosine did not meet prespecified PSA criteria for response as a single agent in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. However, 20% of patients had evidence of PSA reduction, suggesting modest single-agent clinical activity. The role of perifosine in combination with androgen deprivation or chemotherapy is currently under investigation.     

Low-dose cisplatin and UFT for hormone refractory prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: Biochemical modulation (BM) was initially used to enhance the effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by modulating its pharmacological action with the addition of other drugs. BM with low-dose cisplatin and 5-FU or UFT has been examined in cases of advanced gastric or pancreas cancer and 30 to 40% response rates have been reported. In the present study, the effect of BM on hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients was examined. METHODS: BM consisting of 5 mg/body of cisplatin 3 times per week and 300-450 mg of UFT/day was given to 30 HRPC patients (median and range of age: 66 and 52-72, respectively). The ECOG performance status was 0 to 1. Gleason score was 7 in 8 patients, 8 in 10 patients and 9 in 12 patients, respectively. The metastatic site was bone in 29 patients (extent of disease on bone scan [EOD] grade 1: 10, 2: 10, 3: 8, 4: 1), lymph node in 8 and liver in 1. RESULTS: Among the 29 patients assessable for bone metastasis, 5 (17%) obtained marked improvement on bone scan. One was EOD grade 4 (super bone scan) and 4 were EOD grade 1-3. Eight (28%) were stable and 16 (55%) progressed on bone scan. Among 8 patients with lymph node metastasis, 4 (50%) showed partial response and 4 (50%) progression. One patient with liver metastasis showed complete response. Fourteen (47%) out of 30 patients showed a PSA decline of 50% or greater. Their median response duration was 8 months (range; 2 to 44 months). Among the 25 patients assessable for bone pain, 7 (28%) improved, 12 (48%) remained stable and 6 (24%) progressed. A side effect of Grade II anemia was seen in one patient. CONCLUSION: BM is effective in almost half of hormone refractory prostate cancer patients.     

Phase II trial of UFT in advanced colorectal and gastric cancer

A phase II trial of continuous oral therapy with UFT, a combination of uracil and the 5-fluorouracil analogue 1-(2-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil (Futraful, Ftorafur), was conducted in 40 patients with advanced colorectal cancer and 18 patients with advanced gastric cancer. Six partial responses were seen in the 36 evaluable patients with colorectal cancer (response rate 16.6%; 95% confidence limits 6.4-32.8%), and one partial response was seen in the 16 evaluable patients with gastric cancer (response rate 6%; 95% confidence limits 0.27-30.2%). The overall toxicity of the treatment was low, and all patients were treated as outpatients. The results suggest that oral UFT has comparable activity to standard regimes of 5-fluorouracil, and because of the convenience of oral administration is a useful therapy in the management of patients with advanced colorectal cancer.     

Phase II trial of oral cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and diethylstilbestrol for androgen-independent prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The authors evaluated the combination of oral cyclophosphamide, oral prednisone, and diethylstilbestrol (DES) in patients with androgen-independent prostate carcinoma (AIPC). METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with prostate carcinoma refractory to androgen ablation who had undergone antiandrogen withdrawal (if previously treated with an antiandrogen) were enrolled in the current study. They were treated with oral cyclophosphamide 100 mg per day on Days 1-20, prednisone 10 mg per day continuously, and DES 1 mg continuously, on a 30-day cycle. Warfarin 1 mg per day was given as prophylaxis for thrombosis. Patient levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) were monitored on a monthly basis, with imaging studies every 3 months. Patients continued to receive therapy until disease progression or the occurrence of significant toxicity. The effect of therapy on the patient's quality of life was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were evaluable for response. Of the 36 patients, 15 (42%) had a 50% or greater decline in PSA levels from pretreatment levels and 1 patient (6%) with measurable disease had a partial response to therapy. The median duration of response was 4.5 months (range, 4-18 months). The overall median survival period was 16.4 months. The treatment was well tolerated, with only three patients removed from the study for toxicities associated with treatment. One patient, who had been treated for more than 24 months, developed acute leukemia. Quality of life evaluation in 17 patients showed a significant improvement in responders, whereas nonresponders had no deterioration while receiving therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclophosphamide, prednisone, and DES represent a well tolerated, low-cost combination therapy with significant activity in the treatment of patients with AIPC.     

激素抵抗性前列腺癌化疗15例报告

目的：探讨多西紫杉醇联合泼尼松治疗内分泌治疗失败前列腺癌的应用价值。方法：入选15例非激素依赖性前列腺癌患者,给予多西紫杉醇75 mg/m^2,第1天;泼尼松5 mg bid,第1-21天,21天为1个周期,每例接受化疗6-10个周期不等。结果：本组病例随访6-87周,中位61周。其中26.7%（4/15）完全缓解,46.7%（7/15）部分缓解,20.0%（3/15）稳定,6.66%（1/15）进展。缓解和稳定患者的PSA进展中位时间是40.3周（13-67周）。8例骨痛患者中5例疼痛缓解。 中位生存期大于12个月。不良反应可耐受。结论：多西紫杉醇联合泼尼松治疗激素抵抗性前列腺癌有较好疗效,不良反应轻。     

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of radiation therapy-induced microcirculation changes in rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To examine the impact of various patient, disease, and treatment characteristics on outcome in patients treated with neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NAHT) and external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for clinically localized, high-risk prostate adenocarcinoma (initial prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level >20, Gleason score 8-10 or Stage > or = T3). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 407 patients treated between 1991 and 2001 with NAHT and EBRT for high-risk prostate cancer. The effect of tumor (PSA level, Gleason score, and T stage) and treatment (NAHT duration, total-hormone duration, preradiation PSA) characteristics on rates of biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS), prostate cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were examined. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 78 months (range: 5-140 months). Actuarial bDFS at 5 years was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46% to 57%) for the entire group. On multivariate analysis, initial PSA level (p = 0.004), Gleason score (p = 0.005), and preradiation PSA level (p < 0.001) were predictive of bDFS, whereas age, T stage, duration of NAHT, and duration of total hormone therapy were not predictive of outcomes. Gleason score and preradiation PSA level were also predictive of prostate cancer-specific survival rates. CONCLUSION: Improved bDFS in patients with high-risk prostate cancer was associated with lower initial PSA level, lower Gleason score, and lower preradiation PSA level. The duration of NAHT did not have an impact on outcomes, but the preradiation PSA was an important predictor of bDFS in high-risk patients.     

Experience with docetaxel in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) at three Australian cancer centers: A retrospective study

Background: Hormone‐refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) is associated with a poor prognosis and has historically been considered relatively chemoresistant. Emerging data demonstrate clinical benefit with the use of docetaxel in HRPC, culminating in two recent published phase III studies demonstrating survival benefit. Currently, docetaxel is registered but not reimbursed for HRPC in Australia. Aim: To retrospectively review prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) response rate, and survival following the use of docetaxel for metastatic HRPC. Methods: Retrospective audit of the use of docetaxel for HRPC from 1 January 2001 to 1 April 2004 in three medical oncology practices. Demographic data, baseline PSA, ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Performance Status, sites of disease, number of cycles received and PSA response rates were collected. Results: Thirty five patients (median age, 71 years; range, 50–88) had an ECOG status of 0 (eight), 1 (20) and 2 (seven). The mean duration from initial prostate cancer diagnosis to start of docetaxel was 5.4 years (range, 0.2–13.5 years). The mean baseline PSA doubling time, available for 29/35 patients, was 1.9 months (range, 0.4–4.9). The median number of metastatic sites was 1 (range, 1–4): bone (34 patients), lymph nodes (10), liver (seven) and lung (seven). Twelve patients were chemotherapy naive; 23 had received prior chemotherapy (21/23 received mitoxantrone). Twenty patients received docetaxel three times weekly; 15 were on weekly schedules. Their mean dose density was 23 mg/m²/week. Patients received an average of 3.2 months of treatment (range, 0.2–11.8). There were 170 recorded toxicities, 13 of which were grade 3–4, and two likely treatment‐related deaths (sepsis). Twelve patients (34%) had >50% PSA response (four were chemotherapy naive); of these 12 responders, seven patients had a >75% PSA response (four chemotherapy naive). Median survival from start of docetaxel was 8 months with 37% alive at 12 months and 23% alive at 24 months. Conclusion: Docetaxel is active in HRPC (in both chemotherapy naive and exposed patients) with a predictable toxicity profile. More research is warranted to identify predictors of response and toxicity.     

Outcome analysis of 300 prostate cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and hypofractionated radiotherapy

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and radical radiotherapy is an established treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. This study sought to analyze the outcomes of patients treated with relatively low-dose hypofractionated radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three hundred patients with T1-T3 prostate cancer were treated between 1996 and 2001. Patients were prescribed 3 months of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation before receiving 5250 cGy in 20 fractions. Patients' case notes and the oncology database were used to retrospectively assess outcomes. Median follow-up was 58 months. RESULTS: Patients presented with prostate cancer with poorer prognostic indicators than that reported in other series. At 5 years, the actuarial cause-specific survival rate was 83.2% and the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse rate was 57.3%. Metastatic disease had developed in 23.4% of patients. PSA relapse continued to occur 5 years from treatment in all prognostic groups. Independent prognostic factors for relapse included treatment near the start of the study period, neoadjuvant oral anti-androgen monotherapy rather than neoadjuvant luteinizing hormone releasing hormone therapy, and diagnosis through transurethral resection of the prostate rather than transrectal ultrasound. CONCLUSION: This is the largest reported series of patients treated with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation and hypofractionated radiotherapy in the United Kingdom. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy did not appear to adequately compensate for the relatively low effective radiation dose used.     

Oral uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy and salvage therapy with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus oral leucovorin (LV) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and salvage chemotherapy with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/LV 24 h infusion. METHODS: Adult patients with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic diseases were enrolled to receive oral UFT 300 mg/m(2)/d plus LV 90 mg/d for 28 days. Treatment was given continuously for 28 days followed by a 7 day rest period from all treatment. For UFT failed patients, weekly 24 h infusion of 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2) plus LV 100 mg/m(2) was used as salvage therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled in the study. The objective response rate was 29.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.8-45.2%] among the 44 evaluable patients and 25.5% in the intent-to-treat population. The median survival for all 51 patients was 16.6 months. The median time to progression was 5.9 months. Diarrhea was the major adverse effect of UFT/LV that made patients reduce dosage. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea developed in 13.7% of patients. Twenty-six patients were treated with weekly 24 h infusional 5-FU/LV as salvage therapy and only two patients responded. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that this 28 day schedule of UFT/LV regimen may offer a well-tolerated, full oral treatment option with efficacy that appears comparable to that of intravenous 5-FU/LV regimens. Parenteral 5-FU/LV as salvage therapy for UFT refractory patients is not recommended.