Impact of HIV Counseling and Testing on HIV-Infected Men Who Have Sex with Men: The South Beach Health Survey

The impact of HIV counseling and testing on sexual risk-taking and related behaviors reported by HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) was examined in a cross-sectional study conducted among a representative sample of residents living in a resort area. Participants provided specimens of oral mucosal transudate for HIV-antibody testing, were interviewed in their homes, and completed a self-administered questionnaire. Specimens were tested by modified ELISA and, if repeatedly positive, confirmed by Western blot. Of 205 men enrolled, 51 (24.9%) tested positive for antibody to HIV. All 51 had been counseled and tested for antibody to HIV-1 (median = 4 tests); 37 (74%) of 50 reported that their most recent test was positive. Twenty (39.2%) said they had engaged in unprotected insertive anal intercourse in the past year; 15 (29.4%) engaged in unprotected insertive anal intercourse with partners who may have been susceptible to HIV infection. Men who reported that their last HIV-antibody test was positive were three times more likely to have engaged in unprotected insertive anal intercourse in the past year (45.9%) as those who did not know they were infected with HIV (15.4%). Counseling and testing is ineffective as a measure for promoting behavior change among HIV-positive MSM in South Beach. More effective social and behavioral interventions must be developed, implemented, and evaluated.     

Maintenance of behavioral change in a cohort of homosexually active men.

OBJECTIVES: To assess associations of perceptions of sexual behavior change with actual risk behaviors and psychosocial variables, and to determine whether perceptions of behavior change predict subsequent behavior. DESIGN: Cohort study of homosexually active men. SETTING: Community health center in Boston, Massachusetts, USA. PATIENTS, PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and sixty-two cohort members who participated in follow-up in 1989 and who had at least one subsequent visit. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Composite risk behavior variable, based on unprotected anogenital contact and number of partners. RESULTS: Of the 96% who had effected behavior change, 47% perceived that they were able to maintain those changes consistently and 58% wanted to make more changes. Perceptions of consistent maintenance were associated with lower risk behavior, lower perceived riskiness of behaviors and susceptibility to AIDS, and fewer barriers to behavior change. Desire for more change was associated with increased behavioral effort, fewer barriers to condom use, and greater perceived riskiness of current behavior. Among those with lower risk behaviors, perceived inconsistent maintenance predicted relapse to more risky behavior at the following visit. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived maintenance of behavior change is potentially useful in identifying individuals at risk of relapse from safer sex.     

Sexual behaviors and sexual risk in a prospective cohort of HIV-positive men and women in New York City, 1994-2002: implications for prevention.

As an ever-increasing number of people infected with HIV are living longer, healthier lives, concerns about continued transmission are growing along with an awareness of the need to develop "prevention for positives." This study of HIV-positive adults in New York City is the first examination of patterns of sexual behavior in a large, representative cohort of HIV-infected individuals followed over an extended time period. A total of 968 HIV-positive adults were interviewed every 6-12 months between 1994 and 2002 and reported considerable variability in sexual behaviors over time. Many persons were not sexually active at all for months at a time; some continued to have multiple partners. Over one third of the cohort had one or more periods when they had engaged in unprotected sex with a partner who was HIV-negative or status unknown (unsafe sex) and one in five reported exchanging sex. Periods of unsafe sex alternated with periods of safer sex. Predictors of sexual risk varied by gender, and among men who had sex with men, and men sexually active with women only. Contextual factors such as partner relations, housing status, and receipt of HIV services were as important as individual attributes as predictors of unsafe sex and sex exchange. The variability observed in sexual risk behavior reported over time provides new insight into the importance of engaging persons living with HIV in ongoing prevention programs.     

Condom use and perceived risk of HIV transmission among sexually active HIV-positive men who have sex with men.

This study examined the association between HIV transmission risk perception and the sexual risk behaviors of HIV-positive men who have sex with men. Respondents rated the degree of risk of transmitting HIV through insertive anal intercourse and insertive oral sex. We examined (a) the perceived level of HIV transmission risk assigned to each sexual behavior and (b) the association between perceived risk for HIV transmission and condom use during insertive anal intercourse and insertive oral sex. We found for behaviors that have achieved less risk consensus that as transmission risk perception increases, so too does the likelihood of condom use. This study highlights the need for more research in understanding how perceived health risk to others influences protective behaviors.     

Recent sexual behaviors among homosexual men seeking primary medical care

We studied the sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge, and beliefs about acquired immunodeficiency syndrome transmission and sexual practices of 823 gay or bisexual men seeking primary care. During the previous 2 months, 64% had engaged in at least one sexual behavior considered unsafe. These patients compared with those having safer sex, were younger, of lower socioeconomic status, and from a racial minority, especially Latino. The unsafe group also had more sexual partners, engaged in sexual acts more often, felt less in control over their sexual behavior, used recreational drugs more frequently, and were less likely to talk about safe sex with partners. The unsafe group had less adequate knowledge about human immunodeficiency virus transmission but felt safer from the risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome even when engaging in unsafe sex. Educational programs dealing more directly with belief systems and the potential addiction to recreational drugs and sexual behaviors need to be developed for primary care settings.     

Correlates of sexual risk behaviors among HIV-positive men who have sex with men.

This study examines correlates of unprotected sexual risk practices of an ethnically diverse sample of HIV-seropositive men who have sex with men (MSM) from the New York City and San Francisco metropolitan areas. Participants completed a self-report survey that assessed sexual risk behaviors and potential correlates. A total of 367 men reported sex with a casual male partner in the previous 3 months. Participants were divided into three groups based on level of HIV-transmission risk with HIV negative or unknown-status partners: no unprotected anal sex (58.9%), unprotected receptive anal sex only (14.2%), and unprotected insertive anal sex (22.6%). Multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that men reporting unprotected anal insertive sex perceived less responsibility to protect their partners from HIV. Men reporting no unprotected anal sex also reported less use of nitrate inhalants, lower temptation for unsafe sex, and fewer HIV-negative and unknown-status partners. Men reporting unprotected receptive anal sex were less anxious than the other two groups but also reported greater depression than those not reporting unprotected anal sex and greater loneliness than those reporting unprotected anal insertive sex. Implications for interventions with HIV-positive MSM are presented.     

Sexual Behaviors and Risks Among Bisexually- and Gay-Identified Young Latino Men

This research compares patterns of sexual behavior and sexual risk of bisexually- and gay-identified Latino young men who have sex with men (YMSM). Four hundred forty-one Latino YMSM were surveyed at community venues in New York City. Twenty-two percent of the sample identified as bisexual, and 78% identified as gay. Bisexually-identified men were more likely to report having had multiple male sex partners in the last 3 months and less likely to report being exclusively involved with a main male partner. They were also approximately 3 1/2 times more likely to report unprotected insertive anal intercourse at last sexual contact with a nonmain male partner and more likely to report being high at last contact with both main and nonmain male partners. Findings suggest that prevention programs need to address the particular sexual risk patterns of bisexually-identified Latino YMSM that place them at risk of both HIV infection and transmission.     

Predictors of Unprotected Anal Intercourse Among HIV-Positive Latino Gay and Bisexual Men

This study examined sexual behaviors in a sample of 155 HIV-positive Latino gay and bisexual men. Nearly half the sample had engaged in unprotected anal intercourse in the past 12 months; unprotected anal intercourse was more likely when the partner was also HIV-positive. Separate regression models predicted the number of receptive and insertive partners for unprotected anal intercourse. Participants reported both more unprotected insertive and receptive partners if they had sex under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Older participants and those with lower levels of Latino acculturation reported having more partners with whom they took the receptive role during unprotected anal intercourse, whereas those with higher levels of depression reported having more partners with whom they took the insertive role. Hierarchical set logistic regression revealed that the dyadic variable of seroconcordance added to the prediction of unprotected anal sex with the most recent male partner, beyond the individual characteristics. Results show the importance of examining both individual and dyadic characteristics in the study of sexual behavior.     

Relapse in sexual behavior among homosexual men: a 2-year follow-up from the Chicago MACS/CCS

Serial biannual cross-sectional assessments of HIV sexual risk indicated a consistent increase in safer sexual practices among homosexual men participating in the Chicago-Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS)/Coping and Change Study (CCS) in 1986-1988. Safer sexual practices were achieved by avoidance of anal sex and less often by consistent use of condoms. Longitudinal patterns of variability in individual behavior were also assessed. After 1 year of follow-up, 53% of the participants maintained safer practices in receptive anal sex, 6% maintained unsafe practices, while 31% relapsed at least once. After 2 years, 45% maintained safer practices, 3% maintained unsafe practices and 47% relapsed at least once. Similar trends were observed in insertive anal sex.     

The low rate of HIV infection in Japanese homosexual and bisexual men: an analysis of HIV seroprevalence and behavioural risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the seroprevalence of HIV-1 infection in homosexual and bisexual men in Nagoya City, Japan. DESIGN: A prospective study ongoing since April 1986. METHODS: Nine hundred and thirty-eight serum samples were collected from 531 participants in August 1990 in an anonymous, confidential testing programme. A self-administered questionnaire was completed and all participants anonymized by a code number. Interviews were conducted and HIV-antibody test results given by telephone, except for the positive test results, which were given in person and counselling offered. RESULTS: Two out of the 531 participants (0.38%) were found to be seropositive for HIV-1, although the seroprevalences of sexually transmitted diseases, including hepatitis B, syphilis, chlamydia infection and amoebiasis, were remarkably high. A small number of participants had had sexual contact with individuals from countries where HIV infection rates are high. No patient had had a recent episode of intravenous drug use. Numbers of male sexual partners were decreasing and unsafe sexual practices, such as anal intercourse without condom use, were also decreasing. CONCLUSIONS: The apparent low-risk behaviour of the men studied here (low levels of sexual contact with foreigners, absence of intravenous drug use, decreasing numbers of sexual partners and unsafe sexual practices) may explain the low prevalence of HIV infection.     

Partner Awareness of the Serostatus of HIV-Seropositive Men Who Have Sex With Men: Impact on Unprotected Sexual Behavior

Prior research has provided conflicting evidence about the association between partner awareness of an HIV-seropositive persons serostatus and HIV transmission behavior via unprotected intercourse. The current study examined partner awareness of participant HIV-seropositive status and sexual behavior in a multiethnic sample of HIV-seropositive men who have sex with men. Most HIV-seropositive men reported that their primary partners are aware, and most reported that at least some non-primary partners are aware the participant was HIV-seropositive before first having sex. Partner awareness of participant HIV-serostatus was related to unprotected sexual behavior during the past 3 months in a non-linear fashion, as men with partners who were inconsistently aware had higher rates of unprotected receptive anal intercourse than men with partners who were consistently aware or consistently unaware. Men with partners who were inconsistently aware also had higher rates of insertive oral intercourse than men with partners who were consistently aware. However, there were no differences in HIV transmission risk behavior between men with partners who were consistently aware and men with partners who were consistently unaware a participant was HIV-seropositive.     

Risk factors for HIV infection among men who have sex with men

OBJECTIVES: Risk factors for HIV acquisition were examined in a recent cohort of men who have sex with men (MSM). DESIGN: A longitudinal analysis of 4295 HIV-negative MSM enrolled in a randomized behavioral intervention trial conducted in six US cities. METHODS: MSM were enrolled and assessed for HIV infection and risk behaviors semi-annually, up to 48 months. RESULTS: In multivariate analysis, men reporting four or more male sex partners, unprotected receptive anal intercourse with any HIV serostatus partners and unprotected insertive anal intercourse with HIV-positive partners were at increased risk of HIV infection, as were those reporting amphetamine or heavy alcohol use and alcohol or drug use before sex. Some depression symptoms and occurrence of gonorrhea also were independently associated with HIV infection. The attributable fractions of high number of male partners, use of alcohol or drugs before sex, and unprotected receptive anal intercourse with unknown status partners and the same with presumed negative partners accounted for 32.3, 29.0, 28.4 and 21.6% of infections, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The challenge is to develop strategies to identify men in need. Interventions are needed to help men reduce their number of sexual partners, occurrences of unprotected anal intercourse, alcohol or drug use before sex and address other mental health issues.     

Sexual Risk and Substance Use Behaviors Among African American Men Who Have Sex with Men and Women

African American men who have sex with men and women (MSMW), but who do not form a sexual identity around same-sex behavior, may experience risk for HIV infection and transmission. This paper reports cross-sectional survey findings on sexual behaviors and substance use of urban non-gay- or non-bisexual-identified African American MSMW (n = 68), who completed behavior assessment surveys using audio-computer assisted self-interviewing technology. Overall, 17.6% reported being HIV-positive. In the past 3 months, 70.6% had unprotected insertive sex with a female, 51.5% had unprotected insertive anal sex (UIAS) with a male, 33.8% had unprotected receptive anal sex (URAS) with a male, 25% had UIAS with a transgender female, and 10.3% had URAS with a transgender female. Findings indicated a bridging potential for HIV and sexually transmitted infections across groups, such that 38.2% reported concurrent unprotected sex with female and male partners and 17.6% reported concurrent unprotected sex with female and transgender female partners. In the past 3 months, 70.6% used alcohol before sex and 85% used drugs before sex. Men who used drugs before sex had a tenfold increased likelihood for unprotected sex with male partners, and men who injected drugs had a nearly fivefold increased likelihood for unprotected sex with a transgender female. Interventions to address sexual risk behaviors, especially partner concurrency, and substance use behavior for these men are warranted.     

Determinants of HIV Risk Reduction Behaviors Among Female Partners of Men with Hemophilia and HIV Infection

Determinants of safer sexual behaviors (abstinence or consistent condom use) among female partners of HIV-infected adult men with hemophilia were examined. A model was proposed predicting that emotional adjustment, communication skills, self-efficacy, and perceived advantages of condom use would influence the practice of safer sexual behaviors. Confidential surveys were completed by 119 seronegative female partners of men with hemophilia and HIV infection who received care from one of 27 hemophilia treatment centers across the United States. The proposed model was tested using LISREL, and the model explained 40% of the variance in safer sexual behaviors. Emotional adjustment was a significant predictor of both intimate and emotional communication skills. Intimate and emotional communication skills were related to self-efficacy for communicating about safer sex, which in turn influenced both communication about safer sex and perceived advantages of condom use. Communication about safer sex with a partner and perceived advantages of condom use had direct effects on safer sexual behaviors. HIV prevention interventions with women known to have seropositive partners should be multifaceted. Skill-building interventions emphasizing communication skills, increasing self-efficacy for communication about safer sex with a partner, and promoting positive attitudes about safer sex should be considered.     

Age-related risk for HIV infection in men who have sex with men: examination of behavioral, relationship, and serostatus variables.

The study examined behavioral, relationship, and serostatus variables that potentially contribute to HIV infection risk in three age groups of men who have sex with men (MSM). MSM recruited in West Hollywood, California self-administered a questionnaire measuring unprotected insertive anal intercourse (UIAI) and unprotected receptive anal intercourse (URAI) with primary and nonprimary partners. The following relationship/serostatus variables were also assessed: recency of HIV testing, knowledge of own HIV serostatus, perception of partner's serostatus, seroconcordance (self and partner seronegative), and self-reported monogamy status. The prevalence of UIAI and URAI was higher with primary than nonprimary partners. These sexual risk behaviors with primary partners were substantially more prevalent among men younger than 25 years of age than among men aged 25 to 30 or over age 30. UIAI and URAI with nonprimary partners were uncommon in each age group, and there were no significant age differences on the serostatus and relationship variables. The findings suggest that young MSM may be at elevated risk for contracting HIV by virtue of their sexual risk behavior with primary partners. Targeted interventions for MSM need to address sexual risk in the context of primary relationships.     

Application of an ecological framework to examine barriers to the adoption of safer conception strategies by HIV-affected couples

Safer conception interventions can significantly reduce the risk of horizontal HIV transmission between HIV-serodiscordant partners. However, prior to implementing safer conception interventions, it is essential to understand potential barriers to their adoption so that strategies can be developed to overcome these barriers. This paper examines potential barriers to the adoption of safer conception strategies by HIV-affected couples in Iringa, Tanzania using an ecological framework. We interviewed 30 HIV-positive women, 30 HIV-positive men and 30 health providers engaged in delivering HIV-related services. We also conducted direct observations at five health facilities. Findings suggest that there are multiple barriers to safer conception that operate at the individual, relational, environmental, structural, and super-structural levels. The barriers to safer conception identified are complex and interact across these levels. Barriers at the individual level included antiretroviral adherence, knowledge of HIV status, knowledge and acceptability of safer conception strategies, and poor nutrition. At the relational level, unplanned pregnancies, non-disclosure of status, gendered power dynamics within relationships, and patient–provider interactions posed a threat to safer conception. HIV stigma and distance to health facilities were environmental barriers to safer conception. At the structural level there were multiple barriers to safer conception, including limited safer conception policy guidelines for people living with HIV (PLHIV), lack of health provider training in safer conception strategies and preconception counseling for PLHIV, limited resources, and lack of integration of HIV and sexual and reproductive health services. Poverty and gender norms were super-structural factors that influenced and reinforced barriers to safer conception, which influenced and operated across different levels of the framework. Multi-level interventions are needed to ensure adoption of safer conception strategies and reduce the risk of HIV transmission between partners within HIV-serodiscordant couples.     

Correlates of unprotected anal intercourse in HIV positive men attending an HIV/AIDS clinic in Sydney

We examined the impact of cognitive and biomedical variables on unprotected anal intercourse between HIV-1 infected men and casual sexual partners in a Sydney-based cohort. Participants answered questionnaires examining insertive and receptive intercourse with and without ejaculation. They completed a modified optimism-scepticism scale, a sexual beliefs scale and a clinical/demographics questionnaire. CD4 count, blood and semen VL were assessed. 43 of 109 reported anal intercourse with HIV+ partners, 33 with HIV- partners and 38 with partners of unknown status. With HIV+ partners past sexually transmittable infections were associated with receptive intercourse without ejaculation (p = 0.03) and insertive intercourse without ejaculation (p = 0.06) while sexual beliefs were associated with insertive intercourse without ejaculation (p = 0.038), receptive intercourse with ejaculation (p = 0.016) and insertive intercourse with ejaculation (p = 0.077). Sexual beliefs were found to have some association with unprotected receptive intercourse without ejaculation with HIV- partners (p = 0.071). With unknown serostatus partners, treatment-optimism (p = 0.026) had association with insertive intercourse with ejaculation while optimism (p = 0.002), sexual beliefs (p = 0.039) and recent VL (p = 0.059) had associations with insertive intercourse without ejaculation. Current STI had association with receptive intercourse with ejaculation with unknown status partners (p = 0.014). We found between-group differences in variables associated with different types of unprotected anal intercourse that may guide the development of prevention strategies.     

In a minority of gay men,sexual risk practice indicates strategic positioning for perceived risk reduction rather than unbridled sex

The aim of this analysis was to examine gay men's sexual risk practice to determine patterns of risk management. Ten cross-sectional surveys of gay men were conducted six-monthly from February 1996 to August 2000 at Sydney gay community social, sex-on-premises and sexual health sites (average n = 827). Every February during this period, five identical surveys were conducted at the annual Gay and Lesbian Mardi Gras Fair Day (average n = 1178). Among the minority of men who had unprotected anal intercourse which involved ejaculation inside with a serodiscordant regular partner, there was a clear pattern of sexual positioning. Few regular couples were both receptive and insertive. Most HIV-positive men were receptive and most HIV-negative men were insertive. Among the minority of men who had unprotected anal intercourse which involved ejaculation inside with casual partners, there was also a pattern of sexual positioning. Whereas many casual couples were both receptive and insertive (especially those involving HIV-positive respondents), among the remainder HIV-positive men tended to be receptive and HIV-negative men tended to be insertive. These patterns of HIV-positive/receptive and HIV-negative/insertive suggest strategic risk reduction positionings rather than mere sexual preferences among a minority of gay men. If so, they point not to complacency but to an ever more complex domain of HIV prevention.     

Comparison of sexual behaviors, unprotected sex, and substance use between two independent cohorts of gay and bisexual men

OBJECTIVE: To compare demographic characteristics, sexual practices, unprotected receptive and insertive anal intercourse, substance use and rates of HIV-1 seroconversion between two prospective cohorts of HIV-negative men who have sex with men. DESIGN: Comparative analysis of two independent cohorts. METHODS: Between May 1995 and April 1996, 235 HIV-negative Vanguard Project (VP) participants were enrolled and between January and December 1985, 263 HIV-negative participants in the Vancouver Lymphadenopathy AIDS Study (VLAS) completed a follow-up visit. The VP participants were compared with VLAS participants with respect to self-reported demographic variables, sexual behaviors, unprotected sex, substance use and rates of HIV-1 seroconversion during follow-up. RESULTS: In comparison with the VLAS participants the VP participants were younger (median age, 26 versus 34 years; P< 0.001), more likely to be non-Caucasian (75 versus 97%; P< 0.001), and were less likely to have attended university/college (35 versus 46%; P = 0.014). The VP participants reported a higher mean number of male sex partners in the previous year (15 versus 12; P= 0.026) and a higher mean number of regular partners (1.7 versus 0.6; P < 0.001). The VP participants were more likely to report engaging in receptive (92 versus 60%; P< 0.001) and insertive (90 versus 69%; P < 0.001) anal intercourse with regular partners and receptive anal intercourse with casual partners (62 versus 38%; P< 0.001). The VLAS participants were more likely to report never using condoms during insertive and receptive anal intercourse with both regular and casual partners. The VP participants were less likely to report using nitrite inhalants (34 versus 43%; P= 0.033), but more likely to report the use of cocaine (30 versus 8%; P< 0.001), LSD (21 versus 3%; P < 0.001), amphetamine (11 versus 1%; P< 0.001), heroin (3 versus 0%; P= 0.010) and methyldiamphetamine (17 versus 10%; P= 0.034). The VLAS participants were nine times more likely to report high-risk sexual behavior, after controlling for differences in age, ethnicity, substance use, and method of recruitment between cohort members. After adjustment for differences in demographics, sexual behaviors, and level of substance use, the risk ratio for seroconversion among VLAS participants remained significantly elevated compared with VP participants. CONCLUSION: These data provide evidence that men who have sex with men who were enrolled in the VP were more sexually active than their VLAS counterparts were 10 years ago as measured by self-reported numbers of regular and casual partners and frequency of anal intercourse with these partners. However, condom use appears to be significantly higher among VP participants, which has contributed to a lower rate of HIV-1 infection.