中文版SRS-22问卷在中国青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者评价中的应用（跨文化修订和可信度分析）

[目的]将脊柱侧凸研究会问卷（SRS-22Questionnaire）引入中国，评价该问卷在中国青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者中的测量特性。[方法]依据国际生活质量评价（the international quality of life assessment，IQOLA）计划规则，将SRS-22患者问卷翻译改编为中文，由专家组研究确定最终版本。使用该问卷对86例（男11例，女75例）正规支具治疗的青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者进行初次测评，患儿年龄在10～18岁，平均13．9岁；侧凸角度在25°～45°，平均35．6°。初测3～4周后，对其中30例患者进行重测。[结果]SRS-22问卷总体α系数为0．88，重测信度为0．97。问卷中的五个因素的α系数分别为：功能活动0．70，疼痛0．80，自我形象0．80，心理状况0．88，对治疗的满意程度0．81．重测信度分别为：功能活动0．85，疼痛0．96，自我形象0．96，心理状况0．95，对治疗的满意程度0．91。因素分析产生6个公共因素，结果累积解释方差贡献为72．29％。[结论]SRS-22问卷翻译改编成中文后具备合格的信度和效度，可以应用该问卷测量中国青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者的生活质量。     

成人特发性脊柱侧凸患者SRS-22简体中文版问卷评分的影响因素分析

目的:探讨临床及影像学参数对成人特发性脊柱侧凸患者脊柱侧凸研究协会22项(SRS-22)量表简体中文版问卷评分的影响.方法:2008年1月～2012年12月109例无支具及手术治疗史的成人特发性脊柱侧凸患者接受SRS-22简体中文版的问卷调查.男17例,女92例;年龄19～40岁,平均24.8岁.冠状面主弯Cobb角16°～102°,平均37.3°.分析SRS-22各维度得分及亚总分与年龄、体重指数、主弯Cobb角及矢状面平衡间的相关性,并分别比较年轻(＜30岁)与年长(≥30岁)、小角度(Cobb角＜40°)与大角度(Cobb角≥40°)、胸弯与胸腰/腰弯以及男性与女性患者间SRS-22评分差异.结果:年龄与SRS-22亚总分、疼痛、心理状况及功能维度得分负相关(r分别为-0.35、-0.50、-0.31、-0.21,P＜0.05);体重指数与疼痛得分负相关(r=-0.23,P＜0.05);主弯Cobb角与SRS-22亚总分、自我形象及功能维度得分负相关(r分别为-0.31、-0.49、-0.30,P＜0.05);矢状面平衡与功能维度得分负相关(r=-0.26,P＜0.05).年长患者SRS-22亚总分、疼痛及心理得分低于年轻患者(P＜0.05).大角度患者SRS-22亚总分、自我形象及功能维度得分低于小角度患者(P＜0.05).胸弯患者自我形象及心理维度得分低于胸腰/腰弯患者(P＜0.05).女性患者的疼痛维度得分明显低于男性(P＜0.05),其余参数及得分无统计学差异.结论:年龄、侧凸Cobb角、体重指数、躯干矢状面平衡可影响成人特发性脊柱侧凸患者SRS-22简体中文版问卷不同维度得分.胸弯患者自我形象及心理受侧凸的影响较腰弯患者更大,女性患者对疼痛的耐受性低于男性.     

特发性脊柱侧凸测评量表的研究现状

特发性脊柱侧凸(idiopathic scoliosis,IS)是一种严重影响患者身心健康的慢性进展性疾病,国内外学者应用各种工具、仪器等对其做了许多测评研究,其中,量表在测评患者对疾病的认知、健康相关生活质量(health-relatedquality of life,HRQOL)及其他影响生理、心理、疗效的主观因素中有不可替代的作用。目前,国内外针对IS已有很多特异性量表,笔者综述了用于IS不同研究目的的量表,报告如下。     

三维超声影像技术用于青少年特发性脊柱侧弯评估的信度与效度研究

目的 探讨三维超声影像技术在站立位评估和测量青少年特发性脊柱侧弯(Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, AIS)患者椎体侧弯角度的可行性，并评价三维超声影像技术针对AIS患者测量结果的信度和效度。方法 15例AIS患者在相同时间段内进行三维超声和传统X线的脊柱全长扫描。三维超声成像在冠状面上采用棘突角(spanous process angle, SPA)测量椎体侧弯角度，而传统X线采用Cobb角法测量椎体侧凸角度；通过计算相关系数(ICC[2,k]),评价三维超声测量方法的可靠性，并采用Pearson相关系数评价SPA角测量方法的有效性。结果 在站立位冠状面上，采用三维超声技术SPA角法对AIS患者脊柱侧凸角度进行测量具有较高的可靠性(ICC[2,k]>0.9,P<0.05)。三维超声成像SPA角测量方法和传统X线Cobb角测量方法无显著性差异(P>0.05);两种测量方法具有很高的相关性(r>0.9)。结论 三维超声可用于AIS患者脊柱侧凸角度的评估，且具有较高的信度和效度。     

中文版斜弱视患者生存质量量表的信度和效度检测

目的检测中文版斜弱视患者生存质量量表(Amblyopia and Strabismus Questionnaire,ASQE)的信度和效度。方法通过系统的前译-回译形成中文版ASQE,并对119例斜弱视患者进行测定,对结果进行信度和效度分析。结果中文版ASQE共5个维度26个条目,总量表的Cronbach′sα系数为0.906,重测信度为0.725～1.000,折半信度为0.893。各维度得分和量表总分相关(r=0.576～0.857,均P<0.01),因子分析提取了6个特征根大于1的因子,各条目载荷0.387～0.889,6个因子累积解释了66.697%的变异。结论中文版ASQE具有良好的信度和效度,适合中国斜弱视患者生存质量的测量。     

青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者术后放射学参数和SRS-22评测结果的相关性研究

目的 探讨青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)术后患者放射学参数与SRS-22量表各维度得分的相关性.方法 95例术后患者(13男,82女)分为2组:胸弯组64例,胸腰弯/腰弯组31例,平均随访时问为2.8年.所有患者行脊柱全长正侧位检查,并填写一份SRS-22量表.在脊柱全长正侧位片上测量放射学参数,计算AIS患者放射学参数与SRS一22四个维度得分间的Spearman等级相关系数(rs).结果 脊柱力线偏移、胸椎后凸角和腰椎前凸角这三个参数与SRS-22各维度得分不存在相关性.胸腰弯/腰弯组的主侧凸残余Cobb角与SRS-22各维度得分同样不存在相关性.胸弯组主侧凸残余Cobb角与自我形象维度得分呈负相关(rs=-0.411,P=0.001).结论 主侧凸为胸弯的AIS术后患者残余Cobb角越大,其SRS-22量表自我形象维度的得分越低.应当尽可能多地矫正胸弯的畸形以改善患者的外观.     

中文版便秘患者症状自评量表的信度与效度研究

目的评价中文版便秘患者症状自评量表(PAC-SYM)的信度、效度和反应度。方法采用中文版PAC-SYM量表、便秘患者生活质量自评量表(PAC-QOL)、简明健康调查问卷(SF-36)和ZUNG焦虑、抑郁自评量表(SAS/SDS)对155例功能性便秘患者进行问卷调查,其中20例患者1周后重测,39例患者接受生物反馈治疗后再次采用PAC-SYM量表评估,对测量结果进行信效度分析。结果中文版PAC-SYM量表内部一致性信度Cronbach′sα系数为0.81～0.91,重测信度组内相关系数(ICC)为0.79～0.91;该量表内容效度指数(CVI)为0.82;中文版PAC-SYM量表总分及各维度得分与SF-36、PAC-QOL、SAS/SDS总分均显著相关(均P<0.01);生物反馈治疗后,PAC-SYM量表总分及各维度得分均较治疗前显著降低(均P<0.01)。结论中文版PAC-SYM量表具有较好的信度、效度和反应度,可用于中国功能性便秘患者症状评估及疗效评价。     

青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者与家属对治疗前SRS-22量表评分认知的一致性及影响因素

目的 :比较青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,AIS)患者与家属对脊柱侧凸研究学会-22(Scoliosis Research Society-22,SRS-22)量表认知一致性的差异,明确影响SRS-22量表各维度得分的临床及影像学参数。方法:2019年1月～2020年1月于我院就诊的46例AIS患者及其家属在治疗前分别填写SRS-22量表,患者中女性37例,男性9例,年龄11～19岁(13.6±1.8岁)。比较AIS患者与家属在SRS-22量表各维度得分的一致性,分析患者性别、年龄、身体质量指数(BMI)、病程、侧凸主弯部位、主弯Cobb角、轴向躯干旋转角(ATR)与SRS-22量表各维度的相关性。结果:AIS患者自评SRS-22量表疼痛、心理状况、功能状况、自我形象得分和总分分别为4.6±0.5、4.0±0.8、4.4±0.6、3.6±0.6和4.2±0.5分,家属评价各维度得分分别为4.6±0.5、4.1±0.7、4.2±0.7、3.2±0.6和4.1±0.5分,患者疼痛、心理状况得分与家属无显著性差异(P=0.868、0.195),功能状况、自我形象得分和总分高于家属,差异有统计学意义(P=0.048、0.001和0.038)。患者自评年龄与心理状况得分呈显著性负相关(r=-0.343,P=0.020),主弯Cobb角度数与功能状况得分呈显著性负相关(r=-0.366,P=0.012),病程、BMI、ATR与各维度得分无显著相关性(P0.05);家属评价各维度得分与患者年龄、主弯Cobb角度数、病程、BMI、ATR均无显著相关性。女性患者的家属在疼痛亚维度平均得分低于男性患者的家属,差异有统计学意义(4.5±0.6分vs 5.0±0.1,P=0.017);其他维度得分无统计学差异(P0.05)。结论:AIS患者对功能状况和自我形象维度的满意度高于其家属,双方在疼痛和心理状况方面具有较好的认知一致性,年龄、主弯Cobb角分别是影响AIS患者SRS-22量表疼痛、功能状况维度得分的因素。     

各国应用脊柱侧凸研究学会22项问卷(SRS-22)评价特发性脊柱侧凸患者健康相关生存质量的现状

特发性脊柱侧凸（idiopathic scoliosis,IS）是指原因不明的脊柱侧凸,其中以青少年特发性脊柱侧凸（adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,AIS）最为常见[1]。近年来随着三维矫形理论和内固定器械的发展,IS的治疗取得了长足的进步。同时,     

青少年特发性脊柱侧凸患者心脏结构和功能的研究

目的 总结AIS患者心脏结构和功能的特点.探讨其影响因紊.方法 回顾分析2003年1月～2005年7月北京协和医院收治的104例主弯为胸弯的患者经全脊柱X线片、CT三维重建以及术中确诊的AIS患者的术前心脏彩色超声资料,其中男性21名,女性83例,年龄10～20岁,平均14.63岁.根据顶椎旋转度、侧弯方向、冠状面角、矢状面角以及侧弯分型分组,对反映AIS患者心脏结构和功能的各项指标进行比较.结果 左侧弯患者与右侧弯患者之间舒张末期左室内径(45.36±3.23 vs 42.02±3.74)、收缩末期左室内径(29.21±3.12 vs 26.49±2.85)以及主肺动脉径(19.71±1.49 vs 18.67±1.80)存在显著性差异(P＜0.05);冠状面角＜45.组与冠状面角＞80°组患者之间的右室内径(17.34±3.71 vs 20.55±4.74)以及冠状面角介于45.一80.组患者与冠状面角＞80.组患者之间的收缩末期左室内径(26.42±3.22 vs 28.73±4.03)存在显著差异(P＜0.05);矢状面角＜20°组与矢状面角＞40°组患者之间的舒张末期左房内径(27.00±3.47 vs 30.30±3.81)以及矢状面角＜20°组患者与其他两组患者之间的主动脉根径(23.89±2.06 vs 25.70±2.60,25.85±2.11)存在显著差异(P＜0.05);冠状面角＞80°组患者与其他两组患者之间的左室射血分数(62.62±5.79 vs 66.30±4.05,67.96±5.12)以及冠状面角＞80°组患者与冠状面角介于45°～80°组患者之间的左室短轴缩短率(33.82±4.17 vs 37.67±4.08)存在显著性差异(P＜0.05).顶椎旋转度、侧弯方向、矢状面角以及侧弯分型不同的患者之间,心脏射血分数及左室短轴缩短率没有显著性差异.结论 虽然AIS患者心脏结构和功能参数整体处于正常范围,但侧弯方向、冠状面角以及矢状面角仍然对AIS患者的心脏结构和功能产生影响.     

Reliability and validity of an adapted Thai version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire

Purpose  

The Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire is a widely accepted questionnaire used to assess the health-related quality of life for scoliosis patients in the United States. However, its adaptation in other languages is necessary for its multinational use. A cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate the validity and reliability of an adapted Thai version of the SRS-22 questionnaire.     

Validation of the Korean version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire

Introduction  

We evaluated the reliability and validity of an adapted Korean version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire.     

Reliability and validity of the adapted Dutch version of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item questionnaire

Background contextAs in other fields of medicine, there is an increasing interest among orthopedic surgeons to measure health-related quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients and to evaluate the burden of disease and the effectiveness of different treatment strategies. The development of the revised Scoliosis Research Society 22-item patient questionnaire (SRS-22r) enabled a comprehensive evaluation of health-related quality of life of these patients. Over the years, the SRS-22r gained wide acceptance and has been used in several different countries, languages, and cultures. The SRS-22r has not been translated into Dutch to date.PurposeTo translate the SRS-22r into Dutch and adapt it cross-culturally as outlined by international guidelines and to test its psychometric properties to measure health-related quality of life of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients in the Netherlands.Study design/settingA cross-sectional, multicenter validation study.Patient sampleA total of 135 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients (mean age 15.1 years old) of three major scoliosis centers in the Netherlands were enrolled in this study. Ninety-two (68%) subjects completed the Dutch SRS-22r, Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ)-CF87 (golden standard for adolescents), and Short Form (SF)-36 (golden standard for adults). Two weeks later, 73 (79%) of 92 respondents returned a second SRS-22r. Demographics, curve type, Risser stage, and treatment status were documented.Outcome measuresFloor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, reproducibility, concurrent validity, and discriminative ability of the Dutch version of the SRS-22r questionnaire.MethodsFor content analysis, SRS-22r domain scores (function, pain, self-image, mental health, and satisfaction with management) were explored and floor and ceiling effects were determined. Cronbach's α was calculated for internal consistency of each domain of the questionnaires and reproducibility was assessed by test-retest reliability analysis. Using Pearson's correlation coefficient, comparison of the domains of the Dutch SRS-22r with the domains of the SF-36 and Child Health Questionnaire-CF87 assessed the concurrent validity. Differences in SRS-22r domain scores between untreated patients with different curve severity determined the discriminative ability of the questionnaire.ResultsThe SRS-22r domains as well as the SF-36 and CHQ-CF87 domains demonstrated no floor effects, but the function, pain, and satisfaction with management domains had ceiling effects, indicating the proportion of subjects with the maximum score between 19.6% and 33.0%. Internal consistency was very satisfactory for all SRS-22r domains: Cronbach's α was between 0.718 and 0.852. By omitting question 15, the internal consistency of the function domain increased from 0.746 to 0.827. Test-retest reliability was ≥0.799 for all SRS-22r domains. The function, pain, mental health, and self-image domains correlated under the 0.001 significance level with the corresponding CHQ-CF87 and SF-36 domains. The satisfaction with management domain did not correlate with the other questionnaires. The SRS-22r had the ability to detect differences between groups with different curve severity; patients with a severe scoliotic curvature had significantly lower pain and self-image domain scores than patients with relatively mild scoliosis.ConclusionsThe Dutch SRS-22r had the properties needed for the measurement of patient perceived health-related quality of life of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients in the Netherlands. The Dutch SRS-22r could be used for the longitudinal follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients from adolescence to adulthood and for establishing the effects of conservative or invasive surgical treatment.     

中文版Hawkins全身麻醉患者满意度问卷的信效度研究

目的分析中文版Hawkins全身麻醉患者满意度问卷的信效度。方法采用专家评价法、条目区分度对问卷条目进行删减;对378例全身麻醉患者进行大样本测试,并进行信度、重测信度及结构效度检验。结果将Hawkins全身麻醉患者满意度问卷中文版修订为9个维度22个条目,条目平均内容效度(I-CVI)为0.87(0.80～1.00),总问卷内容效度(S-CVI/UA)为0.87;条目间差异有统计学意义(P0.05);探索性因子分析提取8个公因子解释累计方差贡献率为80.194%;验证性因子分析显示数据与模型拟合良好;问卷总Cronbachα系数为0.865(0.730～0.946),维度间重测信度Pearson相关系数为0.723～1.000。结论中文版Hawkins全身麻醉患者满意度问卷信效度良好。     

简体中文版King健康问卷在膀胱过度活动症患者中应用的信度和效度分析

目的 评价简体中文版King健康问卷(KHQ)在膀胱过度活动症(OAB)患者中应用的信度和效度.方法 采用"WHO-QOL跨文化生活质量研究问卷翻译法"将英文版KHQ翻译成简体中文,随机抽取就诊于泌尿外科门诊的OAB患者,在第0周和第2周对其进行2次简体中文版KHQ问卷调查.通过Cronbach's α系数评价问卷的内部一致性;用组内相关系数(ICC)评价重测信度;计算各问题得分与所属领域得分的Spearman等级相关系数(rs)评价内容效度;用因子分析评价结构效度.结果 48例符合纳入标准的OAB患者参与本研究,40例完成2次调查,男7例,女33例,年龄(49.6±14.3)岁.KHQ各亚量表和各领域均具有较好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α:0.7l8～0.924)、中到高的重测信度(ICC:0.567～0.995,P<0.01)以及中到高的内容效度(r:0.462～0.964,P<0.01).因子分析法显示简体中文版KHQ具有可接受的结构效度.结论简体中文版KHQ具有较好的信度和效度,可作为评估OAB患者生活质量的专用量表.     

The Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire adapted for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients in China: reliability and validity analysis

Study design Outcome investigation to verify the internal consistency, reproducibility and validity of the adapted Chinese version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in children with idiopathic scoliosis. Objective To develop this questionnaire for the outcome measurement in treating Chinese adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis and evaluate its metric qualities. Summary of background data The SRS-22 questionnaire has proven to be a valid instrument for clinical assessment of patients with idiopathic scoliosis and has been successfully translated into Spanish and Turkish. In most developing countries, however, quality of life and psychological health have been poorly described when treating children with idiopathic scoliosis. Methods Trans-cultural adaptation of the SRS-22 questionnaire was carried out according to the International Quality of Life Assessment Project guidelines. The final version was approved by a committee of experts. The questionnaire was completed by 86 adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis who had been treated with a brace; this included 11 males and 75 females, aged from 10 to 18 years (mean 13.9 years). Curve magnitude ranged from 25° to 45° (mean 35.6°). A subgroup of 30 patients completed the questionnaire again in 3 or 4 weeks. Results Five common factors were acquired from factorial analysis, and the cumulative contribution ratio was 67.66%. The overall alpha coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.88. Coefficients for individual domains were as follows: function/activity, 0.70; pain, 0.80; self-image, 0.80; mental health, 0.88; and satisfaction, 0.81. The questionnaire as a whole had a test–retest correlation coefficient of 0.97. Test–retest correlation coefficients for individual domains were as follows: function, 0.85; pain, 0.96; self-image, 0.96; mental health, 0.95; and satisfaction, 0.91. Conclusion The Chinese version of the SRS-22 questionnaire is eligible in terms of reliability and validity, and can be used to measure HRQoL for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients in Mainland China. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.