Maxillary distraction in cleft lip palate patients: a review of six cases.

Cleft lip and palate patients can present with a maxillary retrusion with tendency to Class III malocclusion after cleft repair. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis is a technique that provides simultaneous skeletal advancement and expansion of the soft tissues. Six nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate patients, ages 12 to 16 years (mean, 13.8 years), underwent maxillary distraction; four had a unilateral and two a bilateral cleft lip and palate. After an incomplete LeFort I osteotomy; a latency period of 3 days was respected. On Postoperative Day 4, distraction was initiated through anterior traction on a Delaire facial mask using distraction forces of 900 gm. Photographs and lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained preoperatively and 4 months after distraction. A cephalometric analysis was performed to compare the sagittal dentocraniofacial morphology before and after distraction. The aesthetic improvement obtained by maxillary distraction osteogenesis during the permanent dentition to correct maxillary retrusion in our cleft lip and palate patients was impressive. Skeletal advancement varying from 1 to 3.5 mm (mean, 1.7 mm) was found. However, significant dentoalveolar compensations occurred in three patients. This was due to the dental anchorage of the distraction device and can be avoided only by the use of skeletal fixation.     

Maxillary advancement with internal distraction device in cleft palate patients

This study aimed to evaluate the results of maxillary advancement by using internal Le Fort 1 distractors on six patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate who had maxillary hypoplasia.The retrognathic maxilla of five patients were protracted with distractor bilaterally, and asymmetric advancement was performed in one patients. A removable intraoral acrylic appliance was used as an anchorage appliance in two patients, and Ragno fan-type expander appliance was used in the others to prevent maxillary collapse during the distraction period. The maxilla of one patient was not distracted successfully due to the maxillary collapse in result of breaking the removable anchorage appliance away. Lateral cephalograms were evaluated before 3 and 12 months after distraction.A desired level of advancement was attained in five patients. In one patient distraction was not performed due to the maxillary collapse. In one of the five patients with a wide oronasal fistula, the size of the fistula was decreased with asymmetric advancement of right and left maxillary segments. Following the retention period of 12 months, the results were stable.It was concluded that effective and easy distraction is possible with internal Le Fort 1 distractors in cleft lip and palate patients who requires maxillary advancement.     

Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft patients: Maxillary advancement and velopharyngeal function

BackgroundMaxillary advancement may affect speech in cleft patients.AimsTo evaluate whether the amount of maxillary advancement in Le Fort I osteotomy affects velopharyngeal function (VPF) in cleft patients.MethodsNinety-three non-syndromic cleft patients (51 females, 42 males) were evaluated retrospectively. All patients had undergone a Le Fort I or bimaxillary (n = 24) osteotomy at Helsinki Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Center.Preoperative and postoperative lateral cephalometric radiographs were digitized to measure the amount of maxillary advancement. Pre- and postoperative speech was assessed perceptually and instrumentally by experienced speech therapists. Student's t-test and Mann–Whitney's U-test were used in the statistical analyses. Kappa statistics were calculated to assess reliability.ResultsThe mean advancement of A point was 4.0 mm horizontally (range: −2.8–11.3) and 3.9 mm vertically (range −14.2–3.9). Although there was a negative change in VPF, the amount of maxillary horizontal or vertical movement did not significantly influence the VPF. There was no difference between the patients with maxillary and bimaxillary osteotomy.ConclusionsThe amount of maxillary advancement does not affect the velopharyngeal function in cleft patients.     

Maxillary advancement and transpalatal expansion using internal distraction in a patient with cleft lip and palate

Correction of sagittal and transverse maxillary discrepancies in patients with cleft lip or palate remains a challenge for craniofacial surgeons. Distraction osteogenesis has revolutionized the conceptualization and approach to the craniofacial malformations and has become a reliable and irreplaceable part of the surgical armamentarium. We are reporting a case of sequential maxillary advancement and transpalatal expansion using internal distraction in a patient with unilateral cleft lip and palate presenting with severe maxillary sagittal and transverse deficiencies.     

Stability after Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft lip and palate patients

Le Fort I osteotomies were performed in 20 patients with cleft lip and palate as a one-segment movement, and the fragments were fixed with miniplates without bone grafting. Tracings of preoperative and serial postoperative lateral cephalograms were used to determine changes in maxillary position. The posterior nasal spine, not subjected to extensive changes during surgical procedures and remodeling, was found to be the most reliable landmark for measuring maxillary advancement and stability. The mean maxillary advancement was 5.96 mm. Analysis did not reveal significant changes in linear and angular measurements from immediately postoperative to 6 months postoperative. A modest maxillary advancement by Le Fort I osteotomy, along with alleviation of palatal scar tissue tension and miniplate fixation, is a stable surgical method in patients with cleft lip and palate.     

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis in cleft lip and palate patients with skeletal anchorage.

OBJECTIVE: Maxillary distraction osteogenesis with the rigid external distraction (RED) system has been used to treat cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients with severe maxillary hypoplasia. We introduce maxillary distraction osteogenesis for CLP patients with skeletal anchorage adapted on a stereolithographic model. PATIENTS: Six maxillary deficiency CLP patients treated according to our CLP treatment protocol had undergone maxillary distraction osteogenesis. METHOD: In all patients, computed tomography (CT) images were recorded preoperatively, and the data were transferred to a workstation. Three-dimensional skeletal structures were reconstructed with CT data sets, and a stereolithographic model was produced. On the stereolithographic model, miniplates were adapted to the surface of maxilla beside aperture piriforms. The operation performed involved a high Le Fort I osteotomy with pterygomaxillary disjunction. Miniplates were fixed to the maxillary segment with three or four screws and used for anchorage of the RED system. Retraction of the maxillary segment was initiated after 1 week. RESULTS: The accuracy of the stereolithographic models was enough to adapt the miniplates so that there was no need to readjust the plates during surgery. Postoperative cephalometric analysis showed that the direction of the retraction was almost parallel to the palatal plane, and dental compensation did not occur. CONCLUSIONS: We performed maxillary distraction osteogenesis with skeletal anchorage adapted on the stereolithographic models. Excellent esthetic outcome and skeletal advancement were achieved without dentoalveolar compensations.     

Factors related to relapse after Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with relapse after maxillary advancement in cleft lip and palate patient. SUBJECTS: Seventy-one cleft lip and palate patients underwent Le Fort I maxillary advancement osteotomy between 1988 and 1998, and 58 patients (42 unilateral cleft and 16 bilateral cleft) with complete data were investigated for relapse by clinical and cephalometric analysis. The clinical follow-up period ranged from 1.5 to 8.5 years (mean 2.5 years). RESULTS: Horizontal advancement averaged 6.9 mm. There was a significant correlation between surgical movement and postoperative relapse in both the horizontal and vertical planes. In vertical repositioning, 15 patients had maxillary intrusion and 31 had inferior repositioning. There was a significant difference between the intrusion group and the inferior repositioning group. There was a significant correlation between surgical and postoperative rotation regardless of the direction. Other factors were evaluated by the horizontal relapse rate. Type of cleft and the rate of relapse were statistically associated. A relapse was more likely to occur in patients with bilateral cleft. There were no significant associations with the rate of relapse in type of operations or previous alveolar bone grafting. There was no significant correlation between the rate of relapse and the number of missing anterior teeth, postoperative overbite and overjet, and age at operation. Four of 71 patients experienced major relapse, and 3 of them underwent jaw surgery again. CONCLUSIONS: Based on clinical and cephalometric analysis, two-jaw surgery should be performed in cases of severe maxillary hypoplasia, and overcorrection may be useful in inferior repositioning or surgical rotation. Special attention should be paid to the patient with bilateral cleft, multiple missing teeth, or shallow postoperative overbite.     

Unilateral advancement of the maxillary minor segment by distraction osteogenesis in patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: report of two cases.

OBJECTIVE: Collapse of the maxillary minor segment with lateral crossbite is a common feature in patients with repaired unilateral cleft lip/palate because of maxillary alveolar bony defect and palatal scar tissue. Distraction osteogenesis (DOG) is an effective technique of lengthening and augmentation for bone and gingiva. This case report describes the effects of unilateral advancement of the maxillary minor segment by DOG in two patients with the repaired unilateral cleft lip/palate.     

Skeletal stability of Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with isolated cleft palate and bilateral cleft lip and palate

The skeletal stability of Le Fort I osteotomy was evaluated retrospectively in 14 patients with isolated cleft palate (CP, mean age 27.2 years) and 11 patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP, mean age 23.7 years). The osteotomy was fixed with titanium plates and the osteotomy gap was grafted with autologous bone. Neither intermaxillary fixation nor occlusal splints were used postoperatively. Skeletal stability was analysed both horizontally and vertically by cephalograms taken shortly before operation, immediately afterwards, and at six months and at one year postoperatively. In the CP group the mean maxillary horizontal advancement (point A) was 4.7 mm (range 0.3-7.8) and the mean vertical lengthening 3.6 mm (range 0.7-6.1). One year postoperatively the mean relapse was 8.5% (0.4 mm) horizontally and 16.7% (0.6 mm) vertically. In the BCLP group the mean horizontal advancement was 5.3 mm (range 0.2-10.7) and the mean vertical lengthening 7.3 mm (range 0.6-11.8). The mean postoperative relapse was 9.4% (0.5 mm) horizontally and 17.8% (1.3 mm) vertically. The skeletal stability and relapse were similar in both cleft types although BCLP patients had more residual cleft problems and their mean surgical advancement was greater. There was great individual variation.     

Frequency of Le Fort I osteotomy after repaired cleft lip and palate or cleft palate.

OBJECTIVE: Diminished maxillary growth is a consequence of labiopalatal repair, and many patients with cleft lip and palate require Le Fort I advancement. The goal of this study was to determine the frequency of maxillary hypoplasia as measured by need for Le Fort I. SUBJECTS: Retrospective cohort study of males born before 1987 and females before 1989. Records of 173 patients with cleft lip and palate and 34 with cleft palate were reviewed. METHODS: Documented age, gender, cleft type, and need for Le Fort I. Pearson chi-square and Fischer's exact analyses were performed to evaluate the frequency of Le Fort I. RESULTS: Of 217 patients with cleft lip and palate or cleft palate, 40 were syndromic; of the remaining 177 patients, 69 had cleft lip, 78 had cleft lip and palate, and 30 had cleft palate. Thirty-seven of 177 patients (20.9%) required Le Fort I, subcategorized by cleft type: 0/69 for cleft lip, 37/78 for cleft lip and palate, and 0/35 for cleft palate (p<.0001). Of the 37/78 (47.4%) cleft lip and palate patients, the frequency of Le Fort I correlated with severity: 5/22 unilateral incomplete cleft lip and palate; 16/33 unilateral complete cleft lip and palate; 1/2 bilateral incomplete cleft lip and palate; 2/4 bilateral asymmetric complete/incomplete cleft lip and palate; 13/17 bilateral complete cleft lip and palate (p<.05). CONCLUSION: Overall frequency of Le Fort I was 20.9% in patients with cleft lip and palate and cleft palate. Of those with cleft lip and palate, 47.7% required maxillary advancement, but none with isolated cleft lip or cleft palate required correction. Frequency of Le Fort I osteotomy correlated with the spectrum of severity of labiopalatal clefting.     

Cephalometric pharyngeal changes after Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

Pharyngeal changes after Le Fort I osteotomy were evaluated cephalometrically in 37 patients (27 M, 10 F; mean age 23.8 years) with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Seven patients had previously undergone velopharyngeal (VPP) flap surgery to improve speech. One year postoperatively the patients without previous VPP showed a significant change (55%-85% of the surgical change) in the upper and lower sagittal depth of the nasopharyngeal airway, but not in the depth of oropharyngeal airway, length of soft palate, or position of hyoid bone. No significant changes were observed between 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Mean surgical horizontal advancement was 4.7 mm and the mean vertical lengthening 4.7 mm anteriorly and 1 mm posteriorly. There was a correlation between the amount of horizontal advancement and the amount of change in the nasopharyngeal airway. The patients with previous VPP showed significant postoperative change (85% of the surgical change) only in the lower nasopharyngeal airway, although their surgical advancement was similar to that without previous VPP. Patients with previous VPP showed significantly smaller depths of upper nasopharyngeal airway postoperatively than the patients without previous VPP. Five patients (13%) needed VPP after the osteotomy. There was no difference in the nasopharyngeal airway in the patients with VPP after the osteotomy when compared to those without, but they seemed to have shortest maxillary lengths and largest mean surgical changes vertically both anteriorly (5.5 mm) and posteriorly (2.3 mm). Moderate maxillary advancement in UCLP patients results in significant changes in the nasopharyngeal airway.     

Cephalometric pharyngeal changes after Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

Pharyngeal changes after Le Fort I osteotomy were evaluated cephalometrically in 37 patients (27 M, 10 F; mean age 23.8 years) with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP). Seven patients had previously undergone velopharyngeal (VPP) flap surgery to improve speech. One year postoperatively the patients without previous VPP showed a significant change (55%-85% of the surgical change) in the upper and lower sagittal depth of the nasopharyngeal airway, but not in the depth of oropharyngeal airway, length of soft palate, or position of hyoid bone. No significant changes were observed between 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. Mean surgical horizontal advancement was 4.7 mm and the mean vertical lengthening 4.7 mm anteriorly and 1 mm posteriorly. There was a correlation between the amount of horizontal advancement and the amount of change in the nasopharyngeal airway. The patients with previous VPP showed significant postoperative change (85% of the surgical change) only in the lower nasopharyngeal airway, although their surgical advancement was similar to that without previous VPP. Patients with previous VPP showed significantly smaller depths of upper nasopharyngeal airway postoperatively than the patients without previous VPP. Five patients (13%) needed VPP after the osteotomy. There was no difference in the nasopharyngeal airway in the patients with VPP after the osteotomy when compared to those without, but they seemed to have shortest maxillary lengths and largest mean surgical changes vertically both anteriorly (5.5 mm) and posteriorly (2.3 mm). Moderate maxillary advancement in UCLP patients results in significant changes in the nasopharyngeal airway.     

Maxillary distraction versus orthognathic surgery in cleft lip and palate patients: effects on speech and velopharyngeal function

This clinical randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the effects of distraction osteogenesis (DO) and conventional orthognathic surgery (CO) on velopharyngeal function and speech outcomes in cleft lip and palate (CLP) patients. Twenty-one CLP patients who required maxillary advancement ranging from 4 to 10 mm were recruited and randomly assigned to either CO or DO. Evaluation of resonance and nasal emission, nasoendoscopic velopharyngeal assessment and nasometry were performed preoperatively and at a minimum of two postoperative times: 3–8 months (mean 4 months) and 12–29 months (mean 17 months). Results showed no significant differences in speech and velopharyngeal function changes between the two groups. No correlation was found between the amount of advancement and the outcome measures. It was concluded that DO has no advantage over CO for the purpose of preventing velopharyngeal incompetence and speech disturbance in moderate cleft maxillary advancement.     

Maxillary protraction in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie - The aim of this study was to evaluate the hard and soft tissue effects and differences of the Alt-RAMEC protocol to the...     

Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术在唇腭裂正颌外科中的应用与评价

目的:观察分析Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术在唇腭裂正颌外科中的应用效果.方法:回顾2004年3月至2006年12月武汉大学口腔医学院口腔颌面外科收治的唇腭裂患者的临床资料,并进行总结与分析,所有患者均进行了以Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术为主的正颌外科治疗.结果:共收集相关病例16例,其中男9例,女7例,平均年龄22.4岁.术前∠SNA平均73.2°,术后LSNA平均79.5°;上颌前移距离平均8.13mm.平均随访时间7.3个月.所有患者术后面容改善明显,经正畸治疗后咬合关系满意.结论:以Le Fort Ⅰ型截骨术为主的正颌外科治疗,可以显著改善唇腭裂患者的颌骨与面容畸形.     

Relapse-related factors of Le Fort I osteotomy in cleft lip and palate patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A systematic review search was based on the PICOS approach, as follows: population: cleft lip and palate patients; intervention: Le Fort I osteotomy; comparator: different surgical protocols; outcome: stability, recurrence or surgical complications; study designs: only case reports were excluded from the review. No restrictions were placed on language or year of publication. Risk of bias was analyzed, heterogeneity was assessed, and subgroup analysis was performed using a level of significance of 1% (p = 0.01).The search identified 248 citations, from which 29 studies were selected and a total of 797 patients enrolled. The level of agreement between the authors was considered excellent (k = 0.810 for study selection and k = 0.941 for study eligibility). Our results reported a mean maxillary advancement of 5.69 mm, a mean vertical downward/upward of 2.85/−2.02 mm and a mean clockwise rotation of 4.15°. Greater surgical relapse rates were reported for vertical downward movement (−1.13 mm, 39.6%), followed by clockwise rotation (−1.41°, 33.9%), sagittal (−0.99 mm, 17.4%) and vertical upward (0.11 mm, 5.4%) movements. No relevance was found regarding the type of cleft, the type of Le Fort I osteotomy, concomitant bone grafting, surgical overcorrection, postoperative rigid or elastic intermaxillary fixation, or retention splint.Study limitations were heterogeneity and the low number of high-quality studies. In spite of reported high relapse rates, Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary reposition is the first-choice procedure for selected cleft lip and palate patients in whom extensive maxillary movements are not required, because of its safety and its three-dimensional movement versatility in one-step surgery. Otherwise, distraction osteogenesis should be considered as the gold standard treatment.     

Selective angiographic studies prior to Le Fort I osteotomy in patients with cleft lip and palate.

In 12 adult patients with cleft lip and palate, external carotid arteriograms were performed. The arterial blood supply to the maxilla, before forward movement by Le Fort I osteotomy was demonstrated. In 14 instances the descending palatine artery and its branches were found to be free from pathological changes. In 10 instances the calibre of the palatine artery was considerably diminished. Clinical experience shows, that after multiple operations for cleft palate, osteotomy of the maxilla with forward movement, can cause circulatory disturbance in the mobilized segments. Such complications can be avoided by the proper choice of procedure. The selective carotid angiogram demonstrates the arterial blood supply to the maxilla and aids in planning correction of the hypoplastic mid-face.