Soft-tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty: cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilised,and measured-resection versus gap technique

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to prove the hypothesis that soft tissues are well balanced using the gap technique with a navigation system in cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilised (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA), leading to better clinical outcomes compared with the measured-resection technique.

Methods

One hundred and thirty-five TKAs (90 CR and 45 PS) were performed in patients with varus-type osteoarthritis using the gap technique guided by the offset-type tensor and a navigation system. Soft-tissue balance (joint-component gap and ligament balance) were intraoperatively assessed with the tensor under 40 lb of joint-distraction force. The achievement in the equalised rectangular gap at extension and flexion was assessed and retrospectively compared with the previous series in which the measured-resection technique was used (20 CR and 100 PS TKAs). In addition, clinical outcomes, including range of motion and Knee Society Score were assessed at a minimum two year follow-up.

Results

In achieving equalised rectangular gaps at extension and flexion, CR TKAs met criteria in more cases [66.7 % (64/90) vs. 44.4 % (20/45) of PS TKA] with the gap technique, which was superior to that with the measured-resection technique [50.0 % (10/20) of CR TKA and 28.0 % (28/100) of PS TKA]. However, clinical outcomes showed no significant differences among groups at minimum two year follow-up.

Conclusions

The superiority of CR TKA with the gap technique in achieving equalised rectangular gaps at extension and flexion does not directly reflect two year postoperative clinical outcomes.     

Outcomes of long retrograde intramedullary nailing for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty

Background

The treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is challenging because of osteopenia and the limited bone available for distal fixation. The purpose of this study was to report the outcomes of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures treated with long retrograde intramedullary nailing.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of 25 patients who were treated with a long retrograde intramedullary nail for periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following TKA. Clinical evaluation included range of motion of knee, Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) score, and radiologic evaluation including time to union, coronal and sagittal alignment of femoral component, lower limb alignment, and implant loosening. The mean duration of follow-up after the fracture repair was 39 months (range 12–47).

Results

All 25 fractures were united with a mean time of 12 weeks (range 8–20). At the last follow-up, the mean knee flexion was 111° (range 60°–130°), the mean KSS was 81.5 (range 50–100), and the mean WOMAC score was 30.2 (range 5–55). Four (16 %) of the 25 patients developed malalignment according to Rorabeck and Taylor criteria, but all patients had a knee flexion of more than 90°. Coronal and sagittal alignments of femoral component and lower limb alignment did not differ significantly between before and after the fracture repair. Complications included the loosening or breakage of distal interlocking screws in three patients. No deep infection or prosthesis loosening was detected at the last follow-up.

Conclusions

Surgical treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures following TKA with long retrograde intramedullary nailing resulted in high union rates and encouraging functional outcomes.     

Comparing navigation-based in vivo knee kinematics pre- and postoperatively between a cruciate-retaining and a cruciate-substituting implant

Purpose

Individual physiological knee kinematics are highly variable in normal knees and are altered following cruciate-substituting (PS) and cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We wanted to know whether knee kinematics are different choosing two different knee designs, CR and PS TKA, during surgery using computer navigation.

Methods

For this purpose, 60 consecutive TKA were randomised, receiving either CR (37 patients) or PS TKA (23 patients). All patients underwent computer navigation, and kinematics were assessed prior to making any cuts or releases and after implantation. Outcome measures were relative rotation between femur and tibia, measured medial and lateral gaps and medial and lateral condylar lift-off.

Results

We were not able to demonstrate a significant difference in femoral external rotation between either group prior to implantation (7.9° CR vs. 7.4° PS) or after implantation (9.0° CR vs. 11.3° PS), both groups showed femoral roll-back. It significantly increased pre- to postoperatively in PS TKA. In the CR group both gaps increased, the change of the medial gap was significantly attributable to medial release. In the PS group both gaps increased and the change of the medial and of the lateral gap was significant. Condylar lift-off was observed in the CR group during 20° and 60° of flexion.

Conclusion

This study did not reveal significant differences in navigation-based knee kinematics between CR and PS implants. Femoral roll-back was observed in both implant designs, but significantly increased pre- to postoperatively in PS TKA. A slight midflexion instability was observed in CR TKA. Intra-operative computer navigation can measure knee kinematics during surgery before and after TKR implantation and may assist surgeons to optimise knee kinematics or identify abnormal knee kinematics that could be corrected with ligament releases to improve the functional result of a TKR, whether it is a CR or PS design. Our intra-operative finding needs to be confirmed using fluoroscopic or radiographic 3D matching after complete recovery from surgery.     

Is There a Gold Standard for TKA Tibial Component Rotational Alignment?

Background

Joint function and durability after TKA depends on many factors, but component alignment is particularly important. Although the transepicondylar axis is regarded as the gold standard for rotationally aligning the femoral component, various techniques exist for tibial component rotational alignment. The impact of this variability on joint kinematics and stability is unknown.

Questions/purposes

We determined how rotationally aligning the tibial component to four different axes changes knee stability and passive tibiofemoral kinematics in a knee after TKA.

Methods

Using a custom surgical navigation system and stability device to measure stability and passive tibiofemoral motion, we tested 10 cadaveric knees from five hemicorpses before TKA and then with the tibial component aligned to four axes using a modified tibial tray.

Results

No changes in knee stability or passive kinematics occurred as a result of the four techniques of tibial rotational alignment. TKA produces a ‘looser’ knee over the native condition by increasing mean laxity by 5.2°, decreasing mean maximum stiffness by 4.5 N·m/°, increasing mean anterior femoral translation during passive flexion by 5.4 mm, and increasing mean internal-external tibial rotation during passive flexion by 4.8°. However, no statistically or clinically important differences occurred between the four TKA conditions.

Conclusions

For all tibial rotations, TKA increased laxity, decreased stiffness, and increased tibiofemoral motion during passive flexion but showed little change based on the tibial alignment.

Clinical Relevance

Our observations suggest surgeons who align the tibial component to any of the axes we examined are expected to have results consistent with those who may use a different axis.     

Do High-Flexion Total Knee Designs Increase the Risk of Femoral Component Loosening?

Background

The purpose of our prospective, randomized, long-term investigation is to compare the aseptic loosening rate of the femoral component of the total knee prosthesis and clinical and radiographic results of high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting knee prosthesis or standard posterior cruciate-substituting knee prosthesis in the same patients.

The effects of femoral component design on the patello-femoral joint in a PS total knee arthroplasty

Introduction

Anterior knee pain following TKA performed utilizing the PFC Sigma system still represents a cause of failure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether or not a recent change in the femoral design (PFC Sigma PS) had a positive impact on the patello-femoral complication rate.

Materials and methods

A consecutive series of 100 TKA using the PFC Sigma PS system was followed prospectively for a minimum of 3 years. All patellae were replaced and a standard lateral release was never performed. Radiographic analysis following the Knee Society Score (KSS) included antero-posterior weight-bearing, lateral and bilateral axial radiographs. TKA rotational alignment was recorded at the final follow-up in 30 consecutive knees by performing a CT evaluation.

Results

Good to excellent clinical results according to the KSS were achieved in 94 % of the knees. Survival without need of reoperation for any reason was 98 % at 3 years minimum follow-up; two reoperations were done for removal of fibromatous intra-articular tissue (“Clunk syndrome”). There were no revisions for septic or aseptic loosening of the components. The mean ROM improved from 104° preoperatively to 115° (97°–132°) postoperatively: postoperative flexion was 120° or more in 58 % of the knees. Severe anterior knee pain was present in 9 % of patients. Radiographic evaluation showed 90 knees with a tibio-femoral anatomical axis between 8° and 2° of valgus (±3° from the intraoperative goal). CT evaluation of 30 consecutive knees showed that the femoral component positioning in relationship to the trans-epicondylar axis had only 2.80° of external rotation (±2.10°) with respect to a planned external rotation of 3°. This difference was statistically significant.

Conclusions

Although the PFC Sigma PS system provides good and predictable results for tricompartmental arthritis of the knee, anterior mechanism complications still represent a reason for dissatisfaction in a substantial group of patients.     

Quadriceps force in relation of intrinsic anteroposterior stability of TKA design

Purpose

Decreased quadriceps strength and fatigue is suspected to be one of the contributing factors for anterior knee pain and malfunction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the amount of quadriceps force required to extend the knee isokinetically after TKA in dependence of different prosthesis designs and the state of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL).

Materials and methods

Eight fresh frozen human knee specimens underwent testing in a kinematic device simulating an isokinetic knee extension cycle from 120° of flexion to full extension. The quadriceps force was measured after implantation of a cruciate retaining (CR) TKA (Genesis II, Smith&Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) applying a conventional CR (11 mm) and a highly conforming (deep dished, DD) polyethylene (PE) inlay consecutively before and after resection of the PCL. Finally, tests were repeated with a posterior-stabilized (PS) design.

Results

Simulating a physiological knee extension, no significant differences in the average quadriceps force were detected between the cruciate preserving inlays (CR 1,146.57 ± 88.04 N, DD 1,150.19 ± 97.54 N, P = 0.86) as long as the PCL was intact. After resection of the PCL, the required quadriceps force increased significantly for both designs (CR 1,203.17 ± 91.51 N, P < 0.01 and DD 1,191.88 ± 80.07 N, P < 0.03). After implantation of the posterior stabilized femoral component quad force decreased to its initial levels with forces significantly lower compared to the PCL deficient knees provided with a CR or DD (PS 1,130.91 ± 107.88 N, P < 0.01) inlay. With a deficient PCL there were no statistical differences for the DD design in comparison with CR in mean quad forces (CR 1,203.17 ± 91.51 N vs. DD 1,191.88 ± 80.07 N, P = 0.50) nor in peak forces (CR 1,729.44 ± 161.86 N, DD 1,688.66 ± 123.18 N, P = 0.17).

Discussion

At intact PCL peak quad forces and mean forces beyond 70° of flexion could be shown to be significantly lower with a PS TKA design in comparison with cruciate preserving designs such as CR and DD. In the PCL deficient knee quad forces with a highly conforming implant (DD) and CR were significantly higher than with a PS TKA. The use of PS implants in all PCL deficient knees seems to be advisable.     

The effect of femoral component design on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty: Genesis II prosthesis versus Vanguard prosthesis

Introduction

The Genesis II knee system incorporates 3° of external rotation into the femoral component and the femoral component is implanted in neutral rotation to the femur. The purpose of this study was to compare patellar tracking of the Genesis II knee system with that of the Vanguard knee system, in which the femoral component is routinely implanted in a 3° externally rotated position to the posterior condylar axis (PCA) of the femur.

Materials and methods

One hundred consecutive knees scheduled to undergo total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were enrolled. Fifty knees underwent TKA with the posterior-stabilized (PS) Genesis II prosthesis and 50 knees underwent TKA with the PS Vanguard prosthesis. Rotation of the femoral component was calculated by measuring the acute angle between the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and the PCA on axial computed tomography (CT) images. The postoperative patellar tilt and displacement were compared between groups. The range of motion and Knee Society scores were also compared.

Results

Forty-eight knees in each group were followed up for 2 years. There was no difference in the angle between the PCA and the TEA on postoperative CT scans between the two designs. There was also no difference in patellar tracking between groups. Both the Genesis II and Vanguard knee systems showed good clinical results at 2 years postoperatively.

Conclusion

The patellar tracking of the Genesis II prosthesis was comparable to that of the Vanguard prosthesis.

Level of evidence

Prospective cohort study, Level II.     

Improved kinematics of total knee replacement following partially navigated modified gap-balancing technique

Purpose

Navigation-based total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has proven its value for restoration of the limb axis. However, patient-orientated results after TKA show a wide variation from the correct implantation technique. Nonphysiological kinematics without posterior femoral rollback and tibial internal rotation in flexion could be one reason for this. We postulated that a modified gap-balancing technique with navigation of the tibia alone, in comparison to a conventional navigated technique, would: (1) obtain lateral femoral rollback, (2) alter condylar liftoff without midflexion instability, (3) significantly differ in femoral and tibial cuts, (4) not be inferior in leg-axis restoration and (5) be comparable in clinical short-term scores.

Methods

In this prospective study, we compared in vivo navigation-based kinematics pre- and postoperatively of 40 consecutive TKA comprising 21 conventional navigation-based TKA and 19 TKA with the modified gap-balancing technique and a reduced navigation workflow. All cuts were double checked and compared with cuts proposed by the navigation system. Clinical results were assessed preoperatively and six months postoperatively.

Results

The modified gap-balancing technique resulted in significantly increased lateral femoral rollback (mean 16.3 mm) and lateral condylar liftoff (mean 1.3 mm) compared to the conventional group. The modified technique comprised an average of 2.1 mm less distal femoral resection and an average of 4° less external rotation and 3.5° more flexion of the femoral component compared with the control group. Average tibial resection height was 1.1 mm greater and average tibial slope was 0.5° elevated compared to the control group. A neutral leg axis was achieved in all cases. Results showed no significant differences in clinical scores between groups.

Conclusion

A partial navigation solely of the tibial cut can securely restore the leg axis. Modification of the surgical technique can possibly reproduce more physiological knee kinematics with higher lateral femoral rollback in flexion without midflexion instability. This might help reduce postoperative problems with the new implant and thus reduce the amount of unsatisfactory results. Despite equal short-term results, mid- to long-term results are needed to prove whether or not this correlates with better clinical results and at least equal implant longevity.